Search

Concentrations of derivatives of benzoic and cinnamic acids and furaldehyde were studied during maturing of a red wine (a mixture of Cabernet Sauvignon and Merlot) in barrique barrels (Quercus robur). Samples were taken at three-week intervals over 6 months. The influence of degree of toasting of the wood on the amount of phenolic compounds in barrique wine was also investigated. The samples were pre-separated using a solid-phase extraction on an RP 105 polymeric sorbent and analysed by high-performance liquid chromatography with UV-DAD detection. Gallic, protocatechuic, p-hydroxybenzoic, vanillic, caffeic, syringic, p-coumaric, ferulic, benzoic and ellagic acids and p-hydroxybenzaldehyde, vanillin, 2-furaldehyde, 5-methoxy-2-furaldehyde and 5-methyl-2-furaldehyde were identified in the extracts of natural and toasted wood chips and in the extracts of the wine. Syringaldehyde was identified only in the extracts of the toasted wood chips. Ellagic acid can be regarded as a characteristic compound of barrique wine ageing and its constant level during some periods could become a marker of maturity of barrique wines. Due to the absence of furaldehydes in natural wines, these compounds can be considered as typical components of barrique wines and so they can serve as a marker of authenticity of barrique wines. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

In the presented project the investigation on discrimination of geographic origin of wine in from border areas is carried out. Authentic wine samples from the border areas of Austria, Czech Republic, Slovakia (and from Serbia) are investigated and compared by applying different physico-chemical methods (e.g. IRMS, NMR, ICP-MS, ICP-OES, EPR, HPLC, UV-VIS, etc.). The comparison of the data sets from the participating countries and the different applied methods will show, to which extent a differentiation can still be achieved in the border areas of the respective countries, which methods prove most efficient and sensitive and if a combination of methods will lead to an increased sensitivity. Furthermore, we also investigate the causes for the potential differentiation, which might be environmentally determined, due to different agricultural and/or enological practices. Results from the first investigated vintage 2016 show a good separation of the respective geographic origins by isotope ratios and element concentrations as well as by other parameters. The relevant parameters for differentiation now have to be critically evaluated to exclude potential lab influences.

Investigation on discrimination of geographic origin in border areas is carried out by investigating and comparing authentic wine samples from the border areas of Austria, Czech Republic, Slovakia (and from Serbia) by applying different physico-chemical methods (e.g. IRMS, NMR, ICP-MS, ICP-OES, EPR, HPLC, UV-VIS, etc…). The comparison of the data sets from the participating countries and the different applied methods demonstrates, to which extent a differentiation can still be achieved in the border areas of the respective countries, which methods prove most efficient and sensitive and if a combination of methods leads to an increased sensitivity. Furthermore, we also investigate the potential causes for the differentiation, as the environment, different agricultural practices or enology. Analysis of two consecutive vintages shows significant variations between the two years, complicating direct comparison of regions beyond individual vintages. Still, several parameters are identified enabling correct and complete differentiation. However, some of them have been found to represent lab effects, whereas others are interpreted as resulting from different agricultural practices or environmentally driven. Only the latter two ones, if consistent, can be used for discrimination of geographic origin.