Search

Study Design: Retrospective observational study., Objective: To scrutinize screw motion used in semiconstrained rotational plate systems for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF)., Summary of Background Data: Semiconstrained rotational plate systems are supposed to control graft subsidence and facilitate lordosis acquisition and maintenance by toggling the instrumented vertebrae via variable-angle screws. However, their benefits may be unrealized if the screws move within the vertebrae., Methods: We reviewed medical records of 119 patients who underwent 1-level, 2-level, 3-level, or 4-level ACDF, divided them into the short-segment (n=62, 1-level or 2-level ACDF) and long-segment (n=59, 3- level or 4-level ACDF) groups, and investigated their immediate and 1-year postoperative lateral radiographs. We measured the fused segmental angle, screw angles at the upper-instrumented vertebra (UIV) and lower-instrumented vertebra (LIV), distance from the screw base to the endplate of UIV/LIV (SBE), and distance from the screw tip to the endplate of UIV/LIV (STE) to analyze the screw motion used in these plate systems. The differences between the immediate and 1-year postoperative values were statistically analyzed. The nonunion level was also investigated., Results: Screw angle and SBE at the LIV significantly decreased in the long-segment group (-14.5±9.8 degrees and -2.8±1.8 mm, respectively) compared with those in the short-segment group (-4.6±6.0 degrees and -1.0±1.5 mm, respectively). Thus, the long-segment group could not maintain the immediate-postoperative segmental angle. Overall, 27 patients developed nonunion, with 19 (70.4%) in the long-segment group and 21 (77.8%) at the lowest fused level., Conclusions: Semiconstrained rotational plate systems provide only vertical forces to the fused segment rather than toggling the instrumented vertebrae. Postoperatively in multilevel ACDF, LIV screws migrate caudally, suggesting that these plate systems are not always effective in maintaining lordosis. Moreover, LIV screws and the anterior wall of the LIV are subject to overloading, resulting in a high rate of nonunion at the lowest fused level., Level of Evidence: Level III., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

The presence of a thoracolumbar transitional vertebra (TLTV) and/or lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) may cause wrong-site surgery and problems while measuring spinopelvic parameters, including pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis. The Castellvi classification of LSTV addresses coronal images but not sagittal or axial images. Therefore, it is unclear how LSTV differs from the normal lumbosacral anatomy. We aimed to investigate the lumbosacral anatomy and vertebral numbering in patients with TLTV and/or LSTV. We performed computed tomography (CT) to identify TLTV, to number presacral vertebrae accurately, and to analyze morphological differences in each LSTV type., Methods: The medical records of 880 patients who underwent spinopelvic fixation between July 2014 and March 2020 were evaluated for TLTV and LSTV. Castellvi LSTVs (above the promontory on the arcuate line of the ilium) and our newly proposed LSTV ("S6 LSTV," with 6 sacral vertebrae and 5 foramina below the promontory) were analyzed. The anatomical location of the lowest thoracic vertebra was defined, and TLTV with dysplastic ribs was identified. Each LSTV type was examined for its morphological features on sagittal and axial CT images., Results: LSTV was observed in 111 (12.6%) of 880 patients. Castellvi type-III LSTV was the most common (42 [37.8%] of 111), followed by S6 LSTV (37 [33.3%] of 111). TLTV was associated with LSTV (87 [78.4%] of 111) and was commonly identified at T13 (59 [67.8%] of 87). On sagittal CT images, the lumbosacral transitional anatomy of Castellvi LSTVs resembled that of normal L5-S1, and the lumbosacral transitional anatomy of S6 LSTV resembled that of normal S1-S2. When comparing the S1 upper segments on axial CT images, most Castellvi LSTVs exhibited S2-like appearances and most S6 LSTVs exhibited L5-like appearances., Conclusions: Although LSTV possesses L5 and S1 features, Castellvi LSTVs have more L5 elements than S1 elements. The converse is true for S6 LSTV. At least for the Castellvi type-IIIb LSTV, the vertebra below the Castellvi type-IIIb LSTV should be recognized as S1, but clinically it is better to recognize it as S2. Overlooking TLTV may cause problems in vertebral numbering due to coexisting LSTV., Clinical Relevance: Three-dimensional CT images are suitable for detecting transitional vertebrae. This study reveals their morphological features on axial CT images and their lumbosacral anatomy on sagittal CT images., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSOA/A289)., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare that there are no relevant conflicts of interest.