Search

Purpose of review The objective of this study is to answer few key questions in order to establish the best possible available diagnostic strategy for incidentally discovered pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs). Recent findings Advances in EUS-guided sampling techniques, cross-sectional and intracystic confocal imaging, molecular biomarkers analysis, determination of cyst fluid glucose, and artificial intelligence, appear to be associated with an improved diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing mucinous from non-mucinous PCLs. Summary The diagnostic process has the aim of recognizing cysts with malignant potential and identifying those with high-risk stigmata and/or worrisome features. Clinicians should avoid performance of unnecessary tests from one side and misdiagnosis from the other, which can easily result in inadvertent surgery of an otherwise benign lesion or malignant progression of a precancerous cyst. Clinical studies to validate recent reported results utilizing novel diagnostic tests are needed, in order to gradually incorporate and combine them into updated guidelines.

Background It is unknown whether there is an advantage to using the wet-suction or slow-pull technique during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) with new-generation needles. We aimed to compare the performance of each technique in EUS-FNB. Methods This was a multicenter, randomized, single-blind, crossover trial including patients with solid lesions of ≥ 1 cm. Four needle passes with 22 G fork-tip or Franseen-type needles were performed, alternating the wet-suction and slow-pull techniques in a randomized order. The primary outcome was the histological yield (samples containing an intact piece of tissue of at least 550 μm). Secondary end points were sample quality (tissue integrity and blood contamination), diagnostic accuracy, and adequate tumor fraction. Results Overall, 210 patients with 146 pancreatic and 64 nonpancreatic lesions were analyzed. A tissue core was retrieved in 150 (71.4 %) and 129 (61.4 %) cases using the wet-suction and the slow-pull techniques, respectively (P = 0.03). The mean tissue integrity score was higher using wet suction (P = 0.02), as was the blood contamination of samples (P Conclusion Overall, the wet-suction technique in EUS-FNB resulted in a higher tissue core procurement rate compared with the slow-pull method. Diagnostic accuracy and the rate of samples with adequate tumor fraction were similar between the two techniques.

Ablative therapies for locoregional treatment of pancreatic neoplastic lesions developed over the last decade to be applied during surgery are now becoming also available to be utilized under endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance. The advantage of this approach is clear because of the close proximity of the EUS transducer to the target lesion, coupled with developments of specifically designed ablation devices, making the procedure minimally invasive, and potentially sparing patients from the morbidity of this method when performed surgically. EUS-guided ablative techniques that have been applied to pancreatic neoplastic cysts, pancreatic functional and non-functional neuroendocrine neoplasms and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma include ethanol injection, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), a combination of bipolar RFA and cryoablation, laser therapy (LT) and photodynamic therapy (PDT). Up to now, most of these procedures have been applied to patients at high surgical risk or who refused surgery. However, more studies evaluating some of these treatments also in selected patients not at surgical risk are becoming available. These studies will pave the road to apply this therapeutic approach to a more extensive number of patients, alone or in association with other therapies, such as immunomodulating drugs. The present manuscript will critically review the available evidence in the field of EUS-guided local ablative treatment of solid and cystic pancreatic neoplasms.

Malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO) has been traditionally managed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). In the case of ERC failure, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PT-BD) has been widely utilized as a salvage procedure. However, over the last decade, endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has gained increasing popularity, especially after the advent of electrocautery-enhanced lumen apposing metal stent devices (EC-LAMSs) which enable a one-step procedure, granting prevention of biliary leakage and minimizing occurrence of adverse events (AEs). In parallel, increasing evidence suggests a possible role of EUS-BD in the management of DMBO as a primary palliative drainage modality. In the current paper, we aim to review all the available evidence on the role of EUS-BD performed with EC-LAMSs and discuss salient technical aspects of this type of procedure.

The close proximity of the endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) probe to the pancreas, coupled with the ease with which a needle can be inserted into a pancreatic lesion, have contributed to the development of EUS-guided therapies for both adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine pancreatic neoplasms. EUS-guided fine needle injection of different types of drugs, implantation of fiducial markers to facilitate stereotactic body radiation therapy or of radioactive seeds to perform brachytherapy, and the use of different thermal and nonthermal ablation devices and techniques have all been tested in preliminary human studies. This manuscript will present the available evidence accumulated thus far in the field of EUS-guided oncological treatment of pancreatic solid tumors, along with a look into possible future applications.

Background Training in advanced endoscopic techniques such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) should be driven by key performance measures and standardized competence assessment in order to provide safe and high-quality interventions. We aimed to determine whether the involvement of trainees influences the outcome of the procedure and the incidence of ERCP-related adverse events. Methods This was an international, multicenter, prospective, observational study conducted at six high- and low-volume centers across Europe between October 2016 and October 2018, and included independent operators and their trainees. Standard report forms documenting indication, trainee involvement, technical outcome, and complications over a 30-day follow-up of consecutive ERCP procedures were included in the analysis. Technical success of the procedure and procedure-related adverse events were compared between procedures in the trainee group and the control group using bivariable and multivariable analysis. Results 21 trainees and 16 control endoscopists performed 1843 ERCPs during the study period. Trainee involvement in ERCP procedures did not decrease technical success (92.4 % vs. 93.7 %; P = 0.30) or increase the risk of adverse events (14.7 % vs. 14.6 %; P > 0.99). Conversely, there were significantly more moderate or severe adverse events in the control group compared with the trainee group (6.2 % vs. 3.4 %, P = 0.01). On multivariable analysis, only increased bilirubin levels, time to cannulation, and procedure difficulty level increased the risk of any procedure-related adverse event. Conclusion Trainee involvement in ERCP interventions within a proper teaching setting is safe and does not compromise the success of the procedure.

Interventional endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a rapidly expanding field with a wide variety of indications, including different drainage procedures and delivery of locoregional treatment mainly for pancreatic solid tumors. Transgastric or transduodenal gallbladder drainage in high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis or biliary decompression in patients with unresectable distal biliary malignant obstruction who failed endoscopic retrograde colangiography is one of the newest areas of EUS-guided intervention. The large-caliber lumen apposing metal stents placed during these procedures allow direct endoscopic gallbladder access and the possibility of performing gallstone treatment or resection of mucosal polyps. The current review presents the indications of endoscopic gallbladder interventions and discusses the results of available studies, foreseeing future potential applications.

The paper describes the occurrence of a rare complication - portal and systemic venous air embolism - after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, related to the endoscopic procedure. It can be associated with the more frequently encountered post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography complications pancreatitis or cholangitis. However, it can also be noted with perforation. The presented case suggests that in the clinical context an early abdominal ultrasound examination confirming hepatic portal venous gas and/or systemic venous air embolism could be useful for the diagnosis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography retroduodenal perforation, and thus highlights the need for a high index of suspicion should this occurrence be noted post-procedurally, in order to ensure the best care of patients. The paper describes the occurrence of a rare complication – portal and systemic venous air embolism – after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, related to the endoscopic procedure. It can be associated with the more frequently encountered post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography complications pancreatitis or cholangitis. However, it can also be noted with perforation. The presented case suggests that in the clinical context an early abdominal ultrasound examination confirming hepatic portal venous gas and/or systemic venous air embolism could be useful for the diagnosis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography retroduodenal perforation, and thus highlights the need for a high index of suspicion should this occurrence be noted post-procedurally, in order to ensure the best care of patients.

In the last decades, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has rapidly evolved from a purely diagnostic procedure into a more interventional/therapeutic one. This transformation has been driven by the availability of echoendoscopes with large working channels, allowing the passage not only of needles for tissue acquisition, but also of bigger accessories needed to perform more advanced procedures. Although most of the tools and some of the techniques are still in development, numerous advancements have been made in different procedures, such as EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections, of bile and pancreatic ducts, and of the gallbladder and in the creation of gastrointestinal (GI) anastomoses and treatment of GI bleeding. Moreover, accessories to perform EUS-guided loco-regional therapies mainly for pancreatic tumors, such as radio-frequency ablation, laser therapy, tumor injection and implantation have been developed and tested in human studies. All these EUS-guided interventions represent potentially the least invasive and most efficacious therapeutic alternatives to more demolitive surgeries. However, one should keep in mind that technological advancements do not automatically mean favourable treatment outcomes, and procedural safety and success mostly depend on proper patient selection, operator’s skills and expertise, organization of the endoscopic unit, and availability of emergency interventional radiological and surgical support.

Gastrointestinal varices are present in about half of patients with portal hypertension (PH). While most patients with PH have liver cirrhosis, it can also develop in the absence of cirrhosis, i.e. ‘non-cirrhotic PH’. Acute variceal bleeding is the most serious complication of PH, occurring in one third of patients with gastrointestinal varices, with an increased mortality of up to 20% at 6 weeks in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis. The present chapter reviews the endoscopic therapeutic options for patients with gastric and ectopic gastrointestinal varices.

Background and study aims We report our experience in endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage performed emergently in 4 prohibitive surgical risk patients with concurrent coagulopathy or on anticoagulant therapy using an electrocautery enhanced lumen apposing self expanding metal stent (LA-SEMS).

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) functions by delivering thermal energy within tissue, the result of a high-frequency alternating current released from an active electrode, leading to coagulative necrosis and cellular death. Recently, a biliary catheter working on a guidewire has been developed and a number of studies have so far been carried out. The present article provides a comprehensive review of the literature on the results of the use of RFA for the clinical management of patients with unresectable malignant biliary strictures, benign biliary strictures, and residual adenomatous tissue in the bile duct after endoscopic papillectomy. Available data show that biliary RFA treatment is a promising adjuvant therapy in patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction. The procedure is safe, well tolerated and improves stent patency and survival, even though more studies are warranted. In patients with residual endobiliary adenomatous tissue after endoscopic papillectomy, a significant rate of neoplasia eradication after a single RFA session has been reported, thus favoring this treatment over surgical intervention. In these patients, as well as in those with benign biliary strictures, dedicated probes with a short electrode able to focus the RF current on the short stenosis are needed to expand RFA treatment for these indications.

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fineneedle aspiration (FNA) is a safe procedure with a low complication rate [1]. To the best of our knowledge, there has only been one previous report of inadvertent fracturing of an FNA needle, which occurred during an attempted EUS-guided rendezvous for an inaccessible main pancreatic duct [2]. We present the case of a 75-year-old woman with an unresectable pancreatic head mass, who was referred to us for EUS-FNA after biliary stent placement. The procedure was performed by an experienced endosonographer from the duodenal bulb using a 22-gauge needle. The needle was inserted into the periphery of the mass to avoid passing through the plastic stent, and the fanning technique was used. At the end of the first pass, an unusual hyperreflecting line was observed, corresponding to the needle tract (●" Fig.1), which suggested that the needle may have broken during the sampling procedure. This was confirmed when the needle was advanced outside the external sheath to collect the specimen. The extremity of the broken needle was further identified protruding from the mucosa of the upper duodenal bulb (●" Fig.2). After various attempts at retrieval, the needle was grasped from the terminal end using a snare and was removed completely, without any consequences to the patient. The needle segment measured 4 cm (●" Fig.3,●" Video 1). There was no obvious cause of this incident. However, it is possible that the plastic stent could have been a relevant factor in the breaking of the needle. This case highlights the importance of ensuring that the correct EUS-FNA procedure is followed. After confirmation of a needle fracture, endoscopic removal can be accomplished with caution using the proper endoscopic accessories, in order to avoid potential damage to both the patient and the echoendoscope.