Search

Background: Migraine is the most common primary headache. It's alone responsible for 1.3% of disability in the world. Migraine both worsen quality of life of individuals and place a significant burden on the society. Despite this, there exists a knowledge gap regarding its repercussions on the Syrian population., Methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled 679 migraine-diagnosed patients from all over Syria through electronic questionnaires disseminated on official social media platforms. Depending on demographic characteristics, physical and mental debility assessed using the Chalder scale, the Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2-item (GAD&#95;2) scale., Results: Our study included 679 participants (mean age: 29.49 years; BMI: 24.55). The sample was predominantly female (74.7%) and mostly single (52%). Females reported higher fatigue (mean = 21.48) than males (mean = 19.22; p < .001). However, Males had better Migraine-Specific Quality of Life (MSQ) scores (mean = 49.90) compared to females (mean = 42.27; p < .001). Females scored higher on anxiety (GAD-2: mean = 2.99 vs. mean = 2.35; p < .001). Moreover, urban residents had higher scores on the Role Preventive (RF-P) subscale of the MSQ than rural residents (mean = 49.93 vs. mean = 44.82; p = .014). Higher fatigue and anxiety levels were associated with lower quality of life scores., Conclusions: This study aimed to elucidate the multifaceted impact of migraines on daily life, considering diverse demographic variables to enhance diagnostic accuracy, treatment efficacy, and disease management strategies., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: To compare pain, quality of life, sleep, anxiety and depression, central sensitization, and functionality between chronic migraine (CM) patients with comorbid fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) and patients with CM alone., Method: Thirty three female patients with CM and thirty three female patients with CM+FMS were enrolled in the study. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were recorded. FM was diagnosed based on the 2016 American College of Rheumatology diagnostic criteria. All participants were evaluated with Allodynia Symptom Checklist, Short Form-36 (SF-36), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) and Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) questionnaires, and Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). FM patients were also evaluated with Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ)., Results: The average number of headache days was significantly higher in patients with CM+FMS (p = 0.006). Among migraine accompanying symptoms, the number of patients with phonophobia was significantly higher in patients with CM+FMS (p = 0.008). While CSI score was 39.0 ± 11.7 in CM patients, it was 52.2 ± 9.2 in CM+FMS patients. CSI scores were higher in CM+FMS patients (p < 0.001). SF-36 sub-cores, including physical function, energy/fatigue, emotional well-being, and general health scores, were lower in CM+FMS patients (p < 0.05). Sleep duration was significantly lower and use of medication to sleep was more common in same group (p < 0.05). FIQ score in CM+FMS patients was associated with quality of life scores, sleep quality, anxiety, and central sensitization scores (p < 0.05)., Conclusion: In patients with chronic migraine, FMS comorbidity negatively affects the quality of life and significantly increases central sensitization., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Migraine is a prevalent neurologic disorder that affects women more than men. Examining health-related quality of life (HRQoL) by gender can aid decision makers in prioritizing future treatment and prevention programs. We aimed to quantify HRQoL by different levels of migraine disability and by gender., Methods: As part of a Canada-wide cross-sectional study, we administered an online survey to employed adults who self-reported a diagnosis of migraine. Migraine disability level was assessed using the Migraine Disability Assessment questionnaire (MIDAS). MIDAS scores were used to categorize respondents as having little to no, mild, moderate, or severe level of migraine-related disability. Physical and mental component summary scores (PCS and MCS) and health utilities were derived from responses to the Veterans Rand 12 Item Health Survey. PCS, MCS, and health utilities were summarized by migraine-related disability levels and gender. Covariate-adjusted linear regressions were used to examine the association between migraine disability level and health utility by gender., Results: A total of 441 participants completed the survey. The sample was predominantly women (60.1%), White race (75.5%), and had a mean age of 37 years. Mean health utility, PCS, and MCS scores were 0.61 (0.22), 45.0 (7.7), and 43.4 (11.0), respectively. All three scores decreased with increased migraine disability level. Gender differences on HRQoL within each migraine disability level were not statistically significant, except in the little to no disability level where women had lower mean MCS scores and health utility relative to men [mean (SD) MCS: women 44.0 (11.3); men 55.1 (8.1), p < 0.001; health utility: women 0.66 (0.18); men 0.81 (0.18), p < 0.001]. Linear regressions showed women with severe migraine-related disability had reduced health utility compared to women with little to no disability [adjusted difference: -0.16 (95%CI -0.24,-0.09)]. Associations among men increased in magnitude with migraine disability level [adjusted differences: mild - 0.16 (95%CI -0.24,-0.09); moderate - 0.18 (95%CI -0.26,-0.10); severe - 0.28 (95%CI -0.37,-0.20)]., Conclusions: Findings contribute to the literature on the association between migraine disability level and HRQoL by examining trends by gender. Model results emphasize the importance of future treatments reducing severe disability due to migraine among both women and men., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Migraine, a condition affecting 12% of the population, is a prevalent cause of disability, significantly impacts individuals during their most productive working years. Several studies have established that a migraine patient's job performance is often limited by absenteeism and presenteeism. The present study aimed to investigate the impact of migraines on occupational burnout, which affects up to 40% of workers., Methods: A subset of participants from the Negev Migraine Cohort, including both migraine patients and non-migraine controls, were asked to complete the study questionnaire. The main exposures of interest were migraine diagnosis and severity. The primary outcome was occupational burnout. Migraine severity and associated disability were evaluated using the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score, psychiatric comorbidities using the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale - 21 Items (DASS-21) scale and occupational burnout using the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI-GS version) scale. Statistical analyses included multivariable quantile regression models to identify associations and adjust for potential confounders., Results: In total, 675 migraine patients and 232 non-migraine participants participated in the study. Migraine patients exhibited higher rates of depression (mean DASS-21: 0.864 vs. 0.664, standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.262), tended to work longer hours (median weekly hours: 40.0 vs. 36.0, SMD = 0.148) and expressed a preference for remote work (20.3% vs. 10.3%, SMD = 0.097). Migraine patients reported significantly higher levels of occupational burnout (mean burnout score: 3.46 vs. 2.82, SMD = 0.469). Controlling for depression, anxiety and stress, migraine diagnosis (25th percentile estimate = 0.67, p = 0.002, 75th percentile estimate = 0.92, p = 0.032) and migraine severity (estimates: 2.2-5.3, p < 0.001 for all) were associated with higher levels of occupational burnout., Conclusions: Migraine diagnosis and severity is associated with an occupational burnout, after controlling for various psychological and work-related factors. The findings underscore the need for workplace adjustments to support migraine patients' participation in the work market., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsGal Ifergane received consulting fees and honorariums from Teva, Novartis, Eli Lilli, Pfizer, and Abbvie. The remaining authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Background: Somatosensory tinnitus (ST) is associated with activation of the auditory pathway by trigeminal or cervical afferents., Objective: This is a cross-sectional observational study that aims to verify the association of ST with TMD, bruxism, migraine and psychosocial aspects., Methods: This study was conducted at the Tinnitus Outpatient Clinic of the Clinical Hospital Complex of the Federal University of Paraná. Specific ST characteristics, were evaluated according to the last consensus for the diagnosis of ST. Two groups with 39 individuals each one were formed, the ST group (STG) and the comparison group (CG). TMD was classified according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders and migraine by the International Classification of Headaches. The presence of probable sleep and awake bruxism was associated with individual's reports and clinical inspections. The applied questionnaires investigated oral behaviours (OB), sleep quality (SQ), psychosocial aspects (PA), central sensitization (CS), tinnitus impact on quality of life (TIQF), and graded chronic pain scale (GCPS)., Results: The STG showed a significant association with modulation manoeuvres and trigger points; myalgias and arthralgia; disc displacement with and without reduction; subluxation; bruxism; and presence of migraine. For the same group, we found a significant association with OB, PA, CS, TIQF and GCPS. There was no significant difference between groups regarding SQ., Conclusion: There is a significant association between the presence of ST and the occurrence of TMD, probable sleep and awake bruxism, and migraine. There is also a greater impairment of OB, PA, CS and TIQF., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Migraine, characterized by recurrent, severe headaches, presents a considerable challenge for patients, health care systems, and employers in the United States. However, there is a lack of recent estimates of the economic and humanistic burden in this population., Objective: To assess the incremental burden of migraine on the total all-cause health care costs and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in the United States, using data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)., Method: This retrospective cross-sectional study included adults (≥18 years) with and without migraine on the 2019-2021 full-year consolidated MEPS Household Component and Medical Provider Component data files. Descriptive analyses were conducted to compare health care expenditures and HRQoL among patients with and without migraine. To estimate the marginal effect of migraine on total health care spending, a two-part model generalized linear models was employed. HRQoL was evaluated using physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores based on the items in the Veterans Rand 12 Health Survey. A multivariate linear regression with log-link was conducted to understanding the factors associated with PCS and MCS scores. All analyses accounted for complex survey design of MEPS., Results: The study included approximately 1.14 million patients with migraine and approximately 184 million patients without migraine. The patients with migraine were majorly female (82.81%), aged 18-45 years (50.24%), and residing in the southern region of the United States (41.45%). A two-part model revealed that marginal total health care expenditures among patients with migraine were $6,078.56 (95% CI = $4,618.45-$8,141.34) higher compared with those without migraine. In terms of HRQoL, average PCS scores in migraine and nonmigraine groups were 39.79 and 42.15, respectively. The average MCS scores were 46.63 and 49.95 for migraine and nonmigraine groups, respectively. After adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, multivariable linear regression models revealed that the PCS score was 2.14 (95% CI = 1.17-4.55) units lower, and the MCS score was 3.19 (95% CI = 2.51-6.07) units lower among patients with migraine compared with those without., Conclusions: Migraine imposes a substantial economic burden on both health care payers and patients in the United States. Notably, prescription drugs make up nearly half of the overall cost. Additionally, patients with migraine experience lower levels of physical and mental HRQoL compared with those without migraine.

Objectives: This study assessed the impact of migraine and fibromyalgia (FM) in TMD patients, focusing on pain, anxiety, depression, and quality of life (QoL). Additionally, we investigated how these variables relate to the total number of comorbidities to gain insights into their interactions., Methods: A retrospective data collection was conducted during January 2016 to December 2022, involving 409 adult TMD patients. TMD patients were categorised into four groups: those without comorbidity (TMD-only) and those with comorbid migraine and/or fibromyalgia (TMD + MG, TMD + FM and TMD + MG + FM). Quantitative variables were compared among them. Linear regression was used to analyse the associations between these variables., Results: Most of study population were women (79%) with a mean age of 44.43 years. TMD + MG patients reported longer pain duration, higher pain scores and greater pain interference compared with TMD-only patients. Similarly, TMD + FM patients had higher pain intensity than patients with TMD only. Both the TMD + MG and TMD + FM groups had higher levels of anxiety, depression, and health impairment compared with patients with TMD only. Patients with all three pain conditions (TMD + MG + FM) experienced the longest pain duration, highest pain intensity, psychological distress, and impaired QoL. The result showed positive associations between pain outcomes, psychological measures, pain's impact on QoL, and the number of comorbidities and a negative association between overall health states and the number of comorbidities., Conclusions: These findings underscore the importance of considering the presence of comorbidities and addressing physical and psychological aspects in the management of TMD patients., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Oral Rehabilitation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Female sexual dysfunction (FSD) is an underdiagnosed and undertreated problem. Few studies have addressed sexual distress in migraine. We aimed to perform a pilot study to determine if there is an association between migraine and sexual dysfunction/distress in premenopausal women and to identify their respective risk factors., Methods: Retrospective, cross-sectional pilot study, including 71 premenopausal female patients with migraine, from the headache outpatient clinic of a tertiary hospital, and 34 age-matched-controls. Female Sexual Function Index-6 (FSFI-6), Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised (FSDS-R), Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Scale, Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Sleep Health Scale (RU-SATED) were applied., Results: Of the 71 patients [40.0 (IQR = 11.00) years], only 12.7 % (n = 9) were not under migraine prophylactic treatment, and most (n = 33, 62.3 %) reported severe disability (MIDAS-IV). FSD and sexual distress were present in 50.7 % (36) patients with migraine [vs 20.6 % (7) controls]. Migraine patients showed lower FSFI-6 scores [19.0 (9.0) vs 24.0 (6.0), p = 0.005], with significantly lower levels of desire (p = 0.011), lubrication (p = 0.002), and satisfaction (p = 0.013), higher sexual distress [11.2 (25.6) vs 3.2 (9.6), p = 0.001], anxiety (p < 0.001), and depression (p < 0.001) levels, and lower sleep health scores (p = 0.005). Old age of onset, being under preventive medication, anxiety/depression, and dysfunctional sleep, were significantly associated with sexual distress. Certain domains of sexual function were associated with sociodemographic and migraine characteristics, anxiety, depression, and sleep health., Conclusions: This pilot study highlights the possible association between migraine and elevated sexual dysfunction/distress levels among premenopausal women. It underscores the importance of sexual health assessments in these individuals, particularly those with higher levels of anxiety, depression, or poor sleep quality. It is important to exercise caution when interpreting results, as they may not be applicable to a wider context. This research paves the way for a larger study that will include a broader population of women from the community and encompass patients followed in different levels of health care., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Migraine affects one in ten individuals worldwide and is the second leading cause of disability. Studies have shown an association between migraine and the musculoskeletal system, and myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) play an essential role. Additionally, those with myofascial pain have been proven to experience higher levels of depression and anxiety. Understanding the association between MTrPs and migraine is crucial for developing targeted treatment strategies. Additionally, recognizing the link between MTrPs and migraine-related depression and anxiety underscores the importance of a holistic approach to migraine management. By addressing both musculoskeletal and neurological factors, healthcare providers can provide more effective and personalized care for migraine patients. This study aims to determine the association between MTrPs with migraine-related disability, anxiety, depression, and migraine characteristics., Methods: This cross-sectional study included 68 migraine patients from an outpatient neurology clinic. The number of MTrPs was determined through examination by an experienced neurologist during a migraine-free period using the recommended international criteria. We evaluated anxiety and depression with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and disability with the Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS)., Results: We enrolled 68 patients (22 males) with a mean age of 36.23 ± 9.63 years. The mean number of MTrPs was 2.75 ± 2.934. MTrPs were positively correlated with severity (CC: 0.576, P-value < 0.001). There was no association between MTrPs and HADS-D or MIDAS, but migraine patients with abnormal HADS-A scores had more MTrPs than patients with normal HADS-A scores (0.6 ± 0.84 vs 3.56 ± 3.11, P-value:0.013)., Conclusions: The number of MTrPs is associated with higher anxiety levels and headache intensity. Further research could investigate the impact of MTrP-based therapies on anxiety among individuals suffering from migraines., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: To investigate the impact of migraine on the tinnitus-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and psychiatric comorbidities in patients with tinnitus., Methods: This cross-sectional study included 227 consecutive patients with tinnitus as their primary complaint. Patients who were diagnosed as having comorbid migraine were asked whether their tinnitus exacerbated during attacks of migraine. All the patients completed three questionnaires: the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults (HHIA) or its counterpart for the Elderly (HHIE), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)., Results: Among the 227 tinnitus patients, 60 (26.4%) had comorbid migraine. There were no significant differences in the THI or HHIA/HHIE scores between patients with migraine and those without migraine (both p > 0.05). The HADS score was significantly higher in patients with migraine than those without migraine (p < 0.05).Out of the 60 tinnitus patients with comorbid migraine, 27 (45.0%) experienced exacerbation of tinnitus during migraine attacks. Patients whose tinnitus exacerbated during migraine attacks had significantly higher scores in THI, HHIA/HHIE, and HADS compared to those whose tinnitus did not change during migraine attacks (p < 0.05 for THI and HADS, p < 0.01 for HHIA/HHIE)., Conclusion: The presence of migraine did not affect the tinnitus-specific HRQOL in tinnitus patients but had significant impacts on their psychiatric comorbidities. However, in patients who experienced exacerbation of tinnitus during migraine attacks, the presence of migraine had a significant impact on the tinnitus-specific HRQOL, hearing handicap, and psychiatric comorbidities., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024, Otology & Neurotology, Inc.)

Migraine can cause different pain activity patterns. This cross-sectional study examines the relationship between pain activity patterns and physical and psychological aspects and sleep quality in women with migraine. Women diagnosed with migraine ( n  = 129) were reached through social media and announcements. Outcome measures were Pattern of Activity Measure-Pain (POAM-P) (avoidance, overdoing, pacing), Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS), International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF), Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). While there was a negative correlation between the POAMP-avoidance and the IPAQ-SF rho = -0.178), there were positive correlations between the POAMP-avoidance and the MIDAS (rho = 0.454), the DASS-21-depression (rho = 0.413), the DASS-21-anxiety (rho = 0.321), and the DASS-21-stress (rho = 0.446). There were positive correlations between the POAMP-overdoing, and the DASS-21-depression (rho = 0.229), the DASS-21-stress (rho = 0.207), and the PSQI (rho = 0.217). There were also positive correlations between the POAMP-pacing and the MIDAS (rho = 0.283), the DASS-21-depression (rho = 0.250), and the DASS-21-anxiety (rho = 0.213) ( p < .05). Pain activity patterns in women with migraines were associated with their disability, physical activity, psychological state, and sleep quality. Determining treatment based on pain activity patterns can improve migraine treatment outcomes.

Introduction: Cognitive symptoms are reported commonly throughout all phases of a migraine; however, there is a paucity of objective cognitive profiling. Previous studies have been limited by practice effect, and variable populations., Methods: Participants completed 1 month of daily testing with a computerised cognitive battery involving a simple reaction (SRT), choice reaction (CRT) and a working memory test (WM). Results were correlated with their diary to identify interictal scores, and scores during each phase of a migraine, and non-migraine headache days., Results: A total of 16 patients with episodic migraine participated. During the headache phase of a migraine, responses to SRT, CRT and WM tasks were significantly slower and less accurate than interictally. During the postdrome, WM task performance was slower and less accurate. Non-migraine headache days were not associated with significant change., Conclusion: The headache and postdromal phase of a migraine day was associated with objective evidence of cognitive dysfunction in patients with episodic migraine., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Migraine is a debilitating neurological condition linked to various psychological comorbidities. The aims of our study are: 1) to evaluate potential psychopathological differences between patients in treatment with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (SPECIFIC group) and those with onabotulinumtoxin-A/oral pharmacotherapy (Group NON-SPECIFIC), 2) to compare treatment efficacy over time between groups, and examined whether psychopathological comorbidities can influence it., Methods: This is a post-hoc ambispective study: a retrospective analysis of patient-level real-life data prospectively collected for clinical evaluation. We enrolled 102 patients with chronic migraine (CM), 64 in treatment with erenumab or galcanezumab, and 38 with botulinum toxin or oral pharmacotherapies. Psychopathological variables are assessed at baseline, whereas clinical factors over time., Results: The NON-SPECIFIC group showed more pronounced emotion regulation difficulties (DERS, p = 0.001), alexithymia (TAS-20, p = 0.012), and impulsiveness (BIS-11, p = 0.002) with respect to the SPECIFIC group. Moreover, treatment efficacy overtime was more pronounced in the group with anti-CGRP treatment with a reduction of migraine frequency overtime, pain intensity, and improved quality of life up to six months post-treatment. Psychopathological comorbidity did not influence treatment efficacy., Conclusions: Our study highlighted more pronounced psychopathological comorbidities in patients in treatment with NON-SPECIFIC therapies in terms of impulsivity, alexithymia, and emotion regulation. Moreover, treatment efficacy overtime was more pronounced and stable over time in the SPECIFIC group, and psychopathological comorbidity did not influence it., Competing Interests: Declarations Disclosures Claudia Altamura received travel grants and honoraria from Novartis, Eli Lilly, Allergan, Lusofarmaco, and Laborest, she serves as Associate Editor for Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. Fabrizio Vernieri received travel grants, honoraria for advisory boards, and speaker panels from Allergan, Angelini, Lilly, Lundbeck, Novartis, and Teva. Simone Migliore, Nicoletta Brunelli, Marilena Marcosano and Giuseppe Curcio have nothing to disclose. Informed consent All patients provided informed consent. Ethical approval None. Conflict of interest None., (© 2024. Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia.)

Background: Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are conditions that involve the temporomandibular joints, masticatory muscles, and associated tissues, causing orofacial pain. Central sensitisation (CS) is a relevant part of the TMD pathophysiology. Migraine, psychological aspects, parafunctional oral habits and widespread pain are commonly associated with both TMD and CS and could confound the association between them., Objectives: To investigate the association between painful TMD and the Central Sensitisation Inventory (CSI) score, and to assess the presence of confounders in this association., Methods: Cross-sectional study that assessed women with and without orofacial pain complaints using telehealth. The TMD Pain Screener and an online physical examination determined the presence of painful TMD. The following questionnaires were applied: CSI, Headache Screening Questionnaire, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Oral Behavior Checklist, Jaw Functional Limitation Scale and the Nordic musculoskeletal questionnaire. A single regression investigated the association between the CSI score and TMD, and a multiple regression investigated the effect of the other outcomes as possible confounders. Confounding was considered present when the association between TMD and the CSI score changed more than 10% after adding a possible confounder to the regression model., Results: Forty-two women with painful TMD and 53 without TMD were included. There was a significant association between the CSI score and the presence of painful TMD (R 2  = 0.639; p < 0.001). This association changed when the following outcomes were added to the model: presence of migraine, symptoms of depression, widespread pain and parafunctional oral habits., Conclusion: The positive association between TMD and the CSI score was confounded by migraine, symptoms of depression, widespread pain and parafunctional oral habits., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background and Objectives : Migraine is a leading cause of disability worldwide, with complex pathophysiological mechanisms involving oxidative and nitrosative stress. Recent research suggests that Indole-3-Propionic Acid (IPA) may have a neuroprotective role in reducing nitrosative stress. This study aims to elucidate the roles of IPA and nitrosative stress biomarkers in migraine patients, focusing on their potential as therapeutic targets. Materials and Methods : This cross-sectional, case-control study included 57 migraine patients and 30 healthy controls. Patients were categorized into episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM) groups. Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics were documented through structured interviews. Validated scales such as the Visual Analog Score (VAS), Headache Impact Test 6 (HIT-6), Migraine Disability Assessment Test (MIDAS), Migraine 24 h Quality of Life Scale (24 h QoL), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Migraine Attacks-Subjective Cognitive Impairments Scale (Mig-SCog) were administered. Venous blood samples were collected, and serum levels of IPA, Nitric Oxide (NO), Nitric Oxide Synthase (NOS), and Peroxynitrite (ONOO - ) were measured using ELISA and spectrophotometric methods. Results : Significant differences in serum IPA and NO levels were observed between migraine patients and controls. Specifically, higher serum IPA levels were found in the EM group, while higher serum NO levels were observed in the CM group. Elevated NO levels correlated with increased migraine attack frequency. Conversely, serum IPA levels showed a negative correlation with attack frequency, suggesting a protective role. Specifically, NO levels were positively correlated with the number of painful days, NSAID usage, VAS scores, HIT-6 scores, and MIDAS scores, while negatively correlated with 24 h QoL scores. Conclusions : The study highlights the significant involvement of IPA and nitrosative stress in migraine pathophysiology. Elevated IPA levels, particularly in EM patients, suggest its potential neuroprotective role. These findings underscore the importance of targeting oxidative and nitrosative stress pathways in developing effective migraine therapies.

Introduction: The complex neurological disorder of migraine is prevalent (19%) and burdensome in university students. Qualitative research exploring the lived experience of migraine in students has yet to be conducted., Methods: Students clinically diagnosed with migraine were recruited (purposive sampling) from a sample of Irish third-level institutions for a one-time anonymized Zoom focus group or individual interview. Focus group questions were sent to participants in advance. Interviews were iterative. Participants were also invited to submit a drawing. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and sent to participants for triangulation. Reflexive thematic content analysis was undertaken, data was imported to Microsoft Excel, initial codes were generated, and themes and sub-themes were derived from the codes. The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Studies Checklist (S1 File) ensured study rigour., Results: Twenty students from three Irish universities participated (mean age 23.8 years). The four key themes identified were (i) Migraine Characteristics, (ii) Migraine Self-Management, (iii) Migraine Clinical Management, and (iii) Migraine Impacts. Migraine was described as not just a headache but a debilitating sensory experience. A notable high level of self-management satisfaction indicated hopeful coping strategies. However, many participants said medications were ineffective and had side effects, and clinical management could be improved. Additionally, there was a marked academic and social impact of migraine, psychological issues abounded, and several participants worried about finances., Conclusions: Migraine is impactful in a cohort of students attending Irish third-level institutions, with students carrying a wide range of debilitating migraine burdens. Students demonstrate an attitude of resilience and determination despite these challenges. Migraine awareness and education campaigns on university campuses are warranted., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Flynn et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Objective: Migraine is commonly overlooked by the general population and by professionals in research and clinical practice. Moreover, it is difficult to grasp the neuropsychological profile of migraineurs due to the cyclic nature of the disorder. With this in mind, a scoping review of the literature was conducted with the goal of characterizing cognitive domains associated with deficits in migraine., Methods: PubMed, PsychInfo, Scopus, EMBASE and OpenGrey databases were searched for studies published from 1st January 2006 to 30th November 2022. Following the review process, 52 eligible studies were included in the review., Results: Studies included in this review show mixed and sometimes contradictory findings. Overall, both visual and auditory perception appear to be impaired. Deficits on attention, many memory processes, visuospatial function and spatial navigation and on a wide range of executive functions (set-shifting and cognitive flexibility, decision-making and reasoning, working memory and prospective memory) complete a complex cognitive profile in migraine. Lack of consistency across studies in sample selection and sizes, lack of detailed links between cognitive deficits and specific migraine phases, or length and chronicity, inconsistencies on the role of aura in cognitive function; and heterogeneity and sometimes questionable reliability and validity of some of the cognitive measures used may affect the clarity and consistency of results observed., Conclusion: Further research properly addressing the role of gender and age, migraine stage, length and chronicity of the condition, the effect of aura and comorbidities is needed, alongside increasing consistency across diverse neuropsychological assessment protocols., Significance: This review provides a comprehensive, up-to-date picture of the current status of knowledge in relation to the characterization of the complex cognitive profile of migraine. It offers detailed information of the existing research gaps and challenges to improve the cognitive characterization of migraine across its different stages and leads clinicians to carefully consider the selection of relevant cognitive tasks, in order to grasp more accurately the patient's cognitive profile; an assessment that should be an integral part of any protocol developed for the clinical assessment and subsequent treatment planning for migraine., (© 2024 The Authors. European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation ‐ EFIC ®.)

Migraine is a disease that is difficult to be recognized by those around the patients, even though it causes significant hindrances. In this study, we conducted an exploratory comparison of the perceptions on migraine among patients, family members living with them, and physicians treating migraine patients. Patients and family members shared a common understanding on the pain of migraine, and hoped to spend more/better time together as a family. However, although family members felt compassion for the patients, lack of understanding by and patients' concern for the surroundings led to feelings of resignation and endurance on the side of patients. Regarding physicians' medical care, our results suggested the importance to understand the wishes and obstacles of each patient and to propose treatment accordingly. In order to reduce the burden of migraine, it is necessary to create an environment and raise awareness that allows people around the patients to understand and support the pain and hopes that each patient feels.

Background: To assess the validity and reliability of the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire 2.1 (MSQv.2.1) in a group of Greek migraineurs., Design-Sample-Methods: The Greek version of MSQv.2.1 (MSQv.2.1-GR), a self-report measure with 14 items in 3 domains (Role Restrictive (RR), Role Preventive (RP) and Emotional Function (EF)), was administered during a cross-sectional study to 141 Greek adult migraineurs and 135 controls without migraine or any other primary headache disorder, along with Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) and Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) to assess validity. MSQv.2.1-GR was re-administered in a group of participants with migraine two weeks afterwards to assess reliability. Content and construct validity was assessed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), Spearman rho, McDonald's omega, Cronbach's alpha. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test the latent structure of the MSQv.2.1-GR in migraineurs., Results: A total of 276 adults participated in the study. Internal consistency of the three MSQv.2.1-GR scales RR, RP and EF yielded a range of McDonald's omega from 0.832 to 0.923 (Cronbach's alpha from 0.814 to 0.923). CFA confirmed the proposed three-factor MSQv.2.1-GR latent structure with acceptable goodness of fit indices and factor loadings. Correlations were established between MSQv2.1-GR component and MIDAS scores, showing moderate and statistically significant relationships (from - 0.519 to -0.562, all p < 0.001) for RR, RP and EF. Correlations between MSQv2.1-GR and SF-12 component scores were identified, with values from 0.1 to 0.4, indicating low to moderate associations. ICC was calculated at 0.997, indicating a high level of reliability between the measures. Notably, all MSQv2.1-GR scores (RR, RP, EF) were significantly higher in the controls compared to migraineurs (p < 0.001 for all scales). These findings suggest that MSQv2.1-GR is internally consistent, shows significant correlations with relevant measures, and is effective in discriminating controls from migraineurs., Conclusion: MSQv2.1-GR is a valid and reliable tool to determine the effect migraine has on the quality of life of Greek-speaking migraineurs., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: High-frequency headache/migraine (HFM) and overuse of acute medication (medication overuse [MO]) are associated with increased disability and impact. Experiencing both HFM and MO can potentially compound impacts, including stigma; however, evidence of this is limited. The objective of this report was to evaluate self-reported stigma, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), disability, and migraine symptomology in US adults with HFM + MO from the Harris Poll Migraine Report Card survey., Methods: US adults (≥ 18 yrs., no upper age limit) who screened positive for migraine per the ID Migraine™ screener completed an online survey. Participants were classified into "current HFM + MO" (≥ 8 days/month with headache/migraine and ≥ 10 days/month of acute medication use over last few months) or "previous HFM + MO" (previously experienced HFM + MO, headaches now occur ≤ 7 days/month with ≤ 9 days/month of acute medication use). Stigma, HRQoL, disability, and most bothersome symptom (MBS) were captured. The validated 8-item Stigma Scale for Chronic Illnesses (SSCI-8) assessed internal and external stigma (scores ≥ 60 are clinically significant). Raw data were weighted to the US adult population. Statistically significant differences were determined by a standard t-test of column proportions and means at the 90% (p < 0.1) and 95% (p < 0.05) confidence levels., Results: Participants (N = 550) were categorized as having current (n = 440; mean age 41.1 years; 54% female; 57% White, not Hispanic; 24% Hispanic; 11% Black, not Hispanic) or previous (n = 110; mean age 47.2 years; 49% female; 75% White, not Hispanic; 13% Hispanic; 4% Black, not Hispanic) HFM + MO. Compared to those with previous HFM + MO (21%), adults with current HFM + MO were more likely to experience clinically significant levels of stigma (47%). Men with current HFM + MO (52% compared to men with previous HFM + MO [25%] and women with current [41%] or previous [18%] HFM + MO), non-Hispanic Black (51% compared to White, not Hispanic [45%] and Hispanic [48%] current HFM + MO groups and White, not Hispanic previous HFM + MO [12%]), current HFM + MO aged 18-49 years (50% compared to those with current HFM + MO aged ≥ 50 years [33%] and those with previous HFM + MO aged 18-49 [34%] and ≥ 50 years [4%]), and employed respondents (53% current and 29% previous compared to those not employed [32% current and 12% previous]) reported higher rates of clinically significant stigma. Those with current HFM + MO were more likely to have worse HRQoL and disability due to headache/migraine. Respondents aged ≥ 50 years with current HFM + MO were more likely than respondents aged 18-49 years with current HFM + MO to indicate that their overall quality of life (66% vs. 52%) and their ability to participate in hobbies/activities they enjoy were negatively impacted by headache/migraine (61% vs. 49%). Pain-related symptoms were identified as the MBS., Conclusions: Together these data suggest that current and previous HFM + MO can be associated with undesirable outcomes, including stigma and reduced HRQoL, which were greatest among people with current HFM + MO, but still considerable for people with previous HFM + MO., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Migraine-related stigma (MiRS) and social burden is increasingly recognized. We assessed perspectives and attitudes toward migraine in people with and without migraine in Japan., Methods: OVERCOME (Japan) was a cross-sectional, population-based web survey of people with and without migraine (July-September 2020). People with migraine were individuals who met the modified International Classification of Headache Disorders criteria or had self-reported physician-diagnosed migraine. People without migraine were selected per quota sampling to represent the Japanese adult population. People with migraine reported their experiences on stigma and social burden and answered how frequently they experienced stigma using the MiRS questionnaire. Associations between MiRS and disability and MiRS and interictal burden were examined using the migraine disability assessment and Migraine Interictal Burden Scale-4. People without migraine reported their experiences and attitudes toward people with migraine by answering an 11-item attitudinal migraine questionnaire., Results: A total of 17,071 and 2008 people with and without migraine, respectively, completed the survey. Overall, 11,228 (65.8%) respondents with migraine reported that they have never experienced stigma or burden; however, of the 12,383 employed respondents, 5841 (47.2%) reported that their current employers are not "extremely" or "very" understanding about their conditions. Moreover, ∼30%-40% of respondents "sometimes," "often," or "very often" hid their migraine from others. The proportion of respondents who experienced stigma often or very often, as assessed by MiRS, was 16.5%; this increased with the increasing number of monthly migraine headache days. The proportion of respondents with moderate-to-severe disability and interictal burden increased with increasing stigma. Among respondents without migraine, the proportion holding a stigmatizing attitude toward those with migraine was low (<15%); ∼80% had never experienced work- or family-related stigma or burden., Conclusion: MiRS and burden exist but may be hidden and underrecognized in Japan. Disease awareness and education may be important to prevent and reduce stigma and burden., (© 2024 The Author(s). Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: There is a lack of data on the epidemiology of IBS in pregnant and postpartum patients in the United States., Methods: A retrospective claims analysis was conducted in a cohort of 1,618,379 patients with ≥1 delivery hospitalization between 2013-2019 utilizing ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes after merging inpatient and outpatient claims. Obstetric, psychological, and other medical comorbidities were also examined., Key Results: The prevalence of IBS in our cohort was 1.38%. Pregnant and postpartum patients with IBS were more likely to have psychological comorbidities including depression (OR 2.93, CI 2.83-3.03), postpartum depression (OR 3.00, CI 2.91-3.09), and anxiety (OR 3.74, CI 3.64-3.84). They were also more likely to have migraines (OR 3.04, CI 2.94-3.15) and connective tissue disease or autoimmune disease (OR 3.54, CI 3.22-3.89)., Conclusion: The prevalence of IBS in pregnant and postpartum patients in a large claims database was 1.38%. Pregnant and postpartum patients with IBS have a higher odd of psychological comorbidities in addition to medical comorbidities such as migraines, connective tissue, and autoimmune disease. Future studies should focus on validating and characterizing the impact and directionality of co-existing comorbidities on IBS severity and the development of new-onset IBS during pregnancy and the postpartum period., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Migraine is a disabling primary headache disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of headache. Migraine not only imposes a burden on the sufferer but also imposes a burden on their family members too. A holistic approach is more essential in the management of migraine and family members should also be included in the management of migraine. There are no published studies done in India so far to look for the impact of migraine on partners and adolescent children (IMPAC). This pilot study was done to assess the IMPAC., Objective: The objective of the study was to study the IMPAC., Materials and Methods: In this descriptive study, 130 chronic migraine patients were observed in a row during 9 months. The impact of migraine on family members as well as migraine disability and Migraine-specific Quality of Life (MSQoL) was evaluated using validated questionnaires., Results: One hundred and thirty chronic migraine patients were studied as part of this study. The mean age of the study population was 34.43 ± 9.002 years, and two-third of the participants were female. The majority of the participants had a moderate-to-severe disability due to migraine and had negatively impacted their MSQoL. The impact of migraine on family members was moderate-to-severe grade in most of the participants and affected their family life negatively both with children and spouses. The males were more significantly affected than females in terms of MSQoL, anxiety, depression, and also on migraine's impact on family members., Conclusion: Migraine not only affects the sufferers, it also significantly affects their family members., (Copyright © 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Annals of African Medicine.)

As a common neurological disorder (10-15% of the population), migraine is associated with numerous comorbidities, particularly other pain syndromes, mental illnesses and functional disorders. These 'psychosomatic' comorbidities increase with migraine severity. Severely affected, comorbid patients also often have a poorer response to specific migraine therapy. Interestingly, migraine and the comorbidities mentioned have a number of common aetiological or facilitating factors, e.g. genetic factors, and show a higher incidence in women and in people with previous traumatic experiences, as well as (in the case of pain syndromes) signs of central sensitization. Another common feature is the association with current or chronic stress. We propose an extended diathesis-stress model that takes into account interrelated but individually different vulnerabilities and, depending on the stress experience, can depict both the occurrence of individual disorders (e.g. an isolated migraine) and the joint occurrence of migraine with other pain syndromes and other psychosomatic comorbidities. In summary, psychosomatic comorbidities should always be kept in mind in migraine therapy and, if necessary, treated early and multimodally., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Migraine is a common and debilitating neurological disorder characterized by the recurrent attack of pulsating headaches typically localized on one side of the head associated with other disabling symptoms, such as nausea, increased sensitivity to light, sound and smell and mood changes. Various clinical factors, including the excessive use of migraine medication, inadequate acute treatment and stressful events, can contribute to the worsening of the condition, which may evolve to chronic migraine, that is, a headache present on >15 days/month for at least 3 months. Chronic migraine is frequently associated with various comorbidities, including anxiety and mood disorders, particularly depression, which complicate the prognosis, response to treatment and overall clinical outcomes. Emerging research indicates a connection between alterations in the composition of the gut microbiota and mental health conditions, particularly anxiety and depression, which are considered disorders of the gut-brain axis. This underscores the potential of modulating the gut microbiota as a new avenue for managing these conditions. In this context, it is interesting to investigate whether migraine, particularly in its chronic form, exhibits a dysbiosis profile similar to that observed in individuals with anxiety and depression. This could pave the way for interventions aimed at modulating the gut microbiota for treating difficult-to-manage migraines., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Background: Migraine is a disease characterized by headache attacks. The disease is multifactorial in etiology and genetic and environmental factors play role in pathogenesis. Migraine can also be accompanied by psychiatric disorders like neurotism and obsessive compulsive disorder. Stress, hormonal changes and certain food intake can trigger attacks in migraine. Previous studies showed that eating attitudes and disorders are prevalant in patients with migraine. Eating disorders are psychiatric disorders related to abnormal eating habits. Both migraine and eating disorders are common in young women and personality profiles of these patient groups are also similar. A possible relationship which shows that migraine and eating habits are related can lead to a better understanding of disease pathogenesis and subsequently new therapeutic options on both entities. Association of migraine in relation to severity, depression and anxiety and eating habits and disorders were aimed to be investigated in this study., Methods: The study was designed as a prospective, multi-center, case control study. Twenty-one centers from Turkey was involved in the study. The gathered data was collected and evaluated at a single designated center. From a pool of 1200 migraine patients and 958 healthy control group, two groups as patient group and study group was created with PS matching method in relation to age, body-mass index, marital status and employment status. Eating Attitudes Test-26 (EAT-26), Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI) and Beck's Anxiety Inventory (BAI) were applied to both study groups. The data gathered was compared between two groups., Results: EAT-26 scores and the requirement for referral to a psychiatrist due to symptoms related to eating disorder were both statistically significantly higher in patient group compared to control group (p = 0.034 and p = 0.0001 respectively). Patients with migraine had higher scores in both BDI and BAI compared to control group (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0001 respectively). Severity of pain or frequency of attacks were not found to be related to eating attitudes (r:0.09, p = 0.055)., Conclusions: Migraine patients were found to have higher EAT-26, BDI and BAI scores along with a higher rate of referral to a psychiatrist due to symptoms. Results of the study showed that eating habits are altered in migraine patients with higher risk of eating disorders. Depression and anxiety are also found to be common amongst migraine patients., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Chronic headache disorders are disabling. The CHESS trial studied the effects of a short non-pharmacological intervention of education with self-management support for people affected by migraine and/or tension type headache for at least 15 days per month for at least three months. There were no statistically significant effects on the Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) at 12-months. However, we observed improvement in pain self-efficacy questionnaire (PSEQ) and short-term HIT-6. We explored the impact of the CHESS intervention on PSEQ, and subsequently, on the HIT-6 and chronic headache quality of life questionnaire (CH-QLQ) at four, eighth and 12 months., Methods: We included all 736 participants from the CHESS trial. We used simple linear regression models to explore the change of HIT-6 and CH-QLQ with treatment and PSEQ at baseline (predictor analysis), and the interaction between treatment and baseline PSEQ (moderator analysis). We considered the change of PSEQ from baseline to four months as a mediator in the mediation analysis., Results: Baseline PSEQ neither predicted nor moderated outcomes. The prediction effect on change of HIT-6 from baseline to 12 months was 0.01 (95% CI, -0.03 to 0.04) and the interaction (moderation) effect was -0.07 (95% CI, -0.15 to 0.002). However, the change of PSEQ from baseline to 4-month mediated the HIT-6 (baseline to 8-, and 12-month) and all components of CH-QLQ (baseline to 8-, and 12-month). The CHESS intervention improved the mediated variable, PSEQ, by 2.34 (95% CI, 0.484 to 4.187) units and this corresponds to an increase of 0.21 (95% CI, 0.03 to 0.45) units in HIT-6 at 12-months. The largest mediated effect was observed on the CH-QLQ Emotional Function, an increase of 1.12 (95% CI, 0.22 to 2.20)., Conclusions: PSEQ was not an effective predictor of outcome. However, change of short-term PSEQ mediated all outcomes, albeit minimally. Future behavioural therapy for chronic headache may need to consider how to achieve larger, and more sustained increases level of self-efficacy than that achieved within the CHESS trial., Trial Registration: ISRCTN79708100., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: Migraine is considered a chronic health condition that impacts both quality of life and psychological wellbeing. People with migraines use a range of management strategies, which include pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments. The aim of this study was to explore individuals' experiences and perceptions of migraines and its treatment using the Common-Sense Model (CSM) of Illness Representations., Methods: Semi-structured, one-to-one interviews were conducted with eleven individuals with a history of migraine to explore their experiences and perceptions of migraine and its treatment. Participants were recruited from across the United Kingdom via convenience sampling using social media advertisement. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and qualitative data were analysed using theoretical framework analysis using the CSM., Results: The three dimensions of the CSM were mapped on to the qualitative data. These were: (i) Cognitive representations of migraine, within five domains: (a) identity of migraine, (b) perceived causes, (c) perceived timeline, (d) perceived control/cure, and (e) perceived consequences; (ii) Emotional representations of migraine relating to (a) migraine specific emotions and (b) emotional representation of the impact of migraine; and (iii) Coping/self-management behaviours, namely (a) self-medicating behaviours and (b) care-seeking behaviours. No incongruous data were found; therefore, no further thematic analysis was required., Conclusion: This is the first study to apply the CSM to migraine for framework analysis of qualitative data in this way. The findings illustrate the emotional impact of migraine and the range of illness perceptions associated with appropriate self-management. The data will be used to design a questionnaire for quantitative studies to investigate the extent to which these perceptions are generalizable to the wider population of people who experience migraines., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society.)

Migraines constitute a neurological disorder characterized by severe and recurrent headaches, significantly impacting the quality of life especially when unresponsive to treatment. This is particularly pronounced in individuals with difficult-to-treat migraines, leading to heightened physical and psychosocial disability. The study aims to design and implement a psychological intervention protocol (MIDITRA) focused on improving the physical and psychological well-being of those suffering from difficult-to-treat migraines. The efficacy of this intervention will be assessed in a pilot study involving 30 adults with chronic, difficult-to-treat migraines. This is an open study, adopting a longitudinal experimental design, and involving inter-subject comparisons between an experimental group (receiving psychological treatment) and a control group (without treatment), being assessed at two post-treatment time points. Additionally, an intra-subject analysis will be conducted, comparing repeated measures to assess changes within each subject before (with two pre-treatment measurements) and after psychological treatment (with two post-treatment measurements). Treated patients will receive a 10-session group psychological intervention. The analysis will focus on the therapeutic benefits of applying the MIDITRA protocol, specifically aiming to reduce migraine-related disability, diminish the negative impact of headaches, enhance the quality of life, mitigate pain catastrophizing, increase life satisfaction, elevate positive affect, decrease negative affect, lower psychological stress, boost resilience, and reduce anxiety and depression.

Objective: The aim of this study was to conduct a pilot, randomized controlled trial (RCT) of acceptance-commitment therapy (ACT) among women with episodic migraine, aged 18-65 years, and living in the United States. Background: Biobehavioral treatments have recently been proposed as possible preventive therapies for migraine management. ACT is a third wave biobehavioral therapy focused on acceptance and development of psychological flexibility and is evidence based for use in other chronic pain conditions. However, its use for reducing migraine frequency and disability has been understudied to date. Methods: The authors performed a pilot RCT evaluating ACT versus enhanced usual care (EUC) among adult women with episodic migraine. ACT consisted of eight virtual weekly sessions (for 8 weeks). Primary aims evaluated feasibility, retention, and protocol adherence. Secondary clinical outcomes included changes in migraine days and Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS). Results: We were able to successfully recruit 54 women in 15 months, which surpassed our recruitment goal. However, the completion rates of migraine logs and questionnaires at both outcome assessments were lower than anticipated. Among the 17 individuals randomized to EUC, 12 (71%) completed migraine logs and 12 (71%) completed questionnaires at the end of the intervention. In the postintervention follow-up, 11 (65%) individuals completed logs and 11 (65%) completed questionnaires. We observed slightly larger decreases in migraine days for those assigned to ACT from baseline to the end of the intervention, but these differences did not persist during postintervention follow-up. Both groups reported similar decreases in MIDAS over time. Conclusions: Recruitment for a large-scale trial of ACT is feasible. Challenges with remote data collection as well as participant burden during the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in lower than anticipated completion rates. Future studies should focus on decreasing participant burden and streamlining study procedures. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT05003362.

Objective: Anxiety and depression are psychiatric comorbidities potentially associated with dizziness and migraine, which can influence disease state, prognosis, and clinical outcomes. Vestibular migraine (VM) is a disease that causes repeated vestibular symptoms in people with a history of migraines. We investigated the prevalence and contributing factors of anxiety and depression in patients with VM. Methods: A total of 74 patients with VM were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent pure-tone audiometry, the examination of spontaneous nystagmus, Dix-Hallpike maneuver or supine-roll test, video head impulse test, and caloric testing on the day of the visit. We used the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to assess the symptoms of anxiety and depression. Dizziness Handicap Inventory was used to measure the intensity of vestibular symptoms. The participants were divided into normal and abnormal groups based on their HADS anxiety and depression scores, and demographic and clinical factors were analyzed. To identify factors associated with anxiety and depression, multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: A total of 36 (48.6%) patients demonstrated clinically relevant anxiety levels, and 24 (32.4%) demonstrated depression. Twenty-five (33.8%) patients were diagnosed with peripheral vestibular dysfunction. In the multivariable analyses, peripheral vestibular dysfunction and severe intensity vestibular symptoms were significantly associated with anxiety and depression. None of migraine features were significantly associated with anxiety and depression. Conclusion: The prevalence of anxiety in patients with VM is considerably higher than in the depression. VM patients with peripheral vestibular dysfunction are particularly susceptible to anxiety and depression. Therefore, timely screening for vestibular function and psychiatric disorders in VM patients should be considered., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Importance: It is usually assumed that an individual's classification as a patient or a healthy person is determined by the presence or absence of disease, but little is known about whether the mere awareness of being a patient or a healthy control can play an important role for reporting outcomes., Objective: To investigate whether assignment to the role of a patient or a healthy control has an effect on patient-reported outcomes., Design, Setting, and Participants: This single center, double-blind, 3-group randomized clinical trial included consecutive patients from a tertiary headache clinic based at a single center in Germany who were invited to participate between October 2019 and June 2023. Statistical analysis was performed from January to March 2024., Intervention: Patients with migraine were randomized into 2 groups. The first group was told that this study was centered on migraine symptoms, whereas the second group was told that healthy controls were being sought for a study about patients with vertigo. A third group of age- and sex-matched headache-free participants served as controls. All participants viewed 2 standardized roller coaster videos and provided ratings of their perceived levels of motion sickness and dizziness., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was self-reported vestibular symptoms. Secondary outcomes included differences in motion sickness, headache burden, and migraine disability. Outcomes were assessed using standardized questionnaires., Results: The final sample included 366 participants: 122 patients with migraine assigned the role of patient (MP) (migraine as patient): mean [SD] age, 37.56 [12.93] years; 105 [86.1%] female), 122 patients with migraine assigned the role of healthy participant (MH) (migraine as healthy): mean [SD] age, 37.03 [13.10] years; 107 [87.7%] female), and 122 headache-free controls (HC): mean [SD] age, 37.55 [11.56] years; 100 [82.0%] female). The assigned role of the individuals with migraine (MP vs MH) had a significant effect on self-disclosure of (1) estimation that symptoms (dizziness) will occur under specific conditions (self-reported vestibular symptoms: 79 MP [64.8%]; 29 MH [23.8%]; 9 HC [7.4%]; P < .001), (2) the increase of such symptoms (dizziness) after viewing the roller coaster video, and (3) the reported frequency (median [IQR] self-reported monthly headache days for MP: 7 [4-15] days; for MH: 5 [2-10] days; P = .008) and severity (median [IQR] migraine disability assessment score for MP: 35 [20-64] points; for MH: 25 [11-47] points; P = .005) of migraine symptoms. Statistically significant changes were also found for self-reported headache frequency and disability caused by migraine., Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found an effect of expectations regarding the role of a patient with respect to clinical and study outcomes. These findings suggest that role expectations should be taken into account when, for example, invasive treatments are discussed., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06322550.

Background: While migraine is markedly prevalent in women, gender-related phenotype differences were rarely assessed. For this reason, we investigated, through a multicenter observational cross-sectional study, based on an online questionnaire, gender-related differences in stress factors, emotions, and pain perception in migraine patients and controls and their impact on migraine severity., Methods: The study was designed as an online questionnaire. The link was emailed to healthy subjects (C) and migraine patients (MIG) (age 18-75, education ≥ 13 years) recruited during the first visit in 8 Italian Headache Centers adhering to Italian Society for Headache Study (SISC). The questionnaire included personal/social/work information, the Perceived Stress Scale, the Romance Quality Scale, the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, the Beck Anxiety Inventory, the Body Perception Questionnaire, the pain perception, and a self-assessment of migraine severity in the last 3 months., Results: 202 MIG and 202 C completed the survey. Independently from gender, migraine was characterized by higher pain sensitivity and more severe partner relationships. The female gender, in MIG, exhibited higher anxiety scores, body awareness, and reduced emotional suppression. Body awareness and emotional suppression were discriminating factors between genders in control and migraine groups without relevant influence on disease features. Perceived perception of migraine severity was similar between genders., Conclusion: Gender-related emotional and stress factors did not contribute to delineate a distinct phenotype in migraine men and women. The possible impact of emotional and stress factors characterizing genders could be considered for a single case-tailored therapeutic approach., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Objective and Background: Visual auras in migraine have been extensively studied, but less is known about multisensory hallucinations or other unusual sensory experiences, including whether these should be diagnostically considered as part of aura symptoms. The current study aimed to conduct a systematic review and synthesis to bring together existing empirical evidence on these non-visual perceptual experiences, focusing on their phenomenological descriptions and clinical correlates., Methods: Forty-eight relevant studies were included based on a systematic search across PsycINFO APA and Web of Science, for peer-reviewed publications in the English language, from 1980 to the present. These comprised a mix of case reports/series (n = 19) and group design studies (n = 29)., Results: Reports of complex multisensory hallucinations, beyond typical established aura symptoms, were numerous and varied in nature. Yet there were limited data on how this related to patient distress and functional interference. Other sensory distortions or hypersensitivities across non-visual domains were also evident, and generally more common in those with established aura symptoms., Conclusion: Our findings provide preliminary evidence that multisensory hallucinations and other unusual perceptual experiences in migraine are likely more common than previously believed. Further investigations are needed to appropriately account for these symptoms within current nosological systems. Increased clinician-patient awareness is important for managing distress (where necessary), and potentially for offering a holistic therapeutic approach to migraine management., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: The objective of this study was to explore the longitudinal relationship between anxiety and depressive symptoms and migraine outcomes in children and adolescents., Background: Children and adolescents with migraine experience more anxiety and depressive symptoms than their peers without migraine, but it is unknown if these symptoms are associated with differential migraine outcomes., Methods: In this prospective clinical cohort study, children and adolescents aged 8.0-18.0 years with migraine completed headache questionnaires and validated measures of anxiety and depressive symptoms (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) at an initial consultation and at their first follow-up visit with a neurologist. Changes in monthly headache frequency and changes in migraine-related disability (Pediatric Migraine Disability Assessment) were tracked at each time point. The relationships between these migraine outcomes and anxiety and depressive symptoms were estimated using models controlling for sex, age, headache frequency, and treatment type., Results: There were 123 consenting participants. In models adjusted for age, sex, baseline disability score, and treatment type, baseline anxiety and depressive symptom levels were not significantly associated with change in headache frequency (for anxiety symptoms: β = -0.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.268 to 0.166, p = 0.639; for depressive symptoms: β = 0.14, 95% CI = -0.079 to 0.359, p = 0.209). Similarly, in models adjusted for age, sex, baseline headache frequency, and treatment type, the change in disability was not associated with baseline anxiety (β = -0.45, 95% CI = -1.69 to 0.78, p = 0.470), nor with baseline depressive symptom scores (β = 0.16, 95% CI = -1.07 to 1.40, p = 0.796). In post hoc exploratory analyses (N = 84 with anxiety and N = 82 with depressive symptom data at both visits), there were also no significant associations between change in mental health symptoms and change in headache frequency (for anxiety symptoms: β = -0.084, 95% CI = -0.246 to 0.078, p = 0.306; for depressive symptoms: β = -0.013, 95% CI = -0.164 to 0.138, p = 0.865). Similarly, the change in disability scores between visits was not related to the change in anxiety (β = 0.85, 95% CI = -0.095 to 1.78, p = 0.077) nor depressive symptom scores (β = 0.32, 95% CI = -0.51 to 1.15, p = 0.446)., Conclusion: Baseline anxiety and depressive symptom levels were not associated with longitudinal migraine outcomes and neither were longitudinal changes in anxiety and depressive symptom levels; this contradicts popular clinical belief that mental health symptoms predict or consistently change in tandem with migraine outcomes., (© 2024 The Authors. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Headache Society.)

Objective: To identify factors affecting the quality of life (QOL) of patients with neurological manifestations of post-COVID syndrome (PCS)., Material and Methods: The study included 60 patients undergoing treatment at the A.Ya. Kozhevnikov Clinic of Nervous Diseases for the underlying disease: tension headaches, migraine, musculoskeletal pain in the neck and back, who had recovered from COVID-19. The main group consisted of 40 patients (average age 47.7±11.43 years). In addition to the manifestations of the underlying disease, they complained of fatigue, decreased performance and concentration, anxiety, memory impairment, low mood, apathy, which arose for the first time during, immediately after, or within 2 months after the coronavirus infection (CI), which met the criteria of the PCS. The comparison group included 20 patients (average age 39±14 years). Patients in this group presented complaints only about their underlying diseases and did not note any peculiarities in their course due to the past CI. For objective assessment of emotional state, we used the Spielberger-Khanin scale, the Beck depression scale, MFI-20, SF-36., Results: Factors influencing the QoL of patients with PCS are age over 40 years, high trait anxiety, depressive and asthenic syndromes. For the most part, the psychological domain of QOL was lower in patients with PCS, a decrease in vital activity, physical functioning, mental health has also been identified., Conclusion: The results of the study indicate a deterioration in QoL in patients with PCS. In terms of rehabilitation treatment, it is necessary to pay more attention to the treatment of anxiety, depressive and asthenic manifestations.

The variants of heterotypic comorbidity of anxiety disorders (AD) with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorders, speech and language development disorders, specific learning disabilities (dyslexia, dysgraphia, dyscalculia), migraine, tension type headache in children and adolescents are discussed. In cases of heterotypic comorbidity the patients with AD referrals to specialists may be primarily associated with their emotional problems. Meanwhile, the comorbidity of AD with these diseases leads to a deterioration of their clinical manifestations and a worsening of the prognosis, and anxiety symptoms often not only persist, but also increase with age. It should be borne in mind that AD in children with neurodevelopmental disorders contribute to a decrease in the quality of life, academic failure, have a negative impact on peer relationships and the family environment, and in young adulthood, patients have an increased risk of depression and substance abuse. Therefore, early intervention and a comprehensive therapeutic approach with a dynamic assessment of the patient's condition are becoming important. When choosing pharmacotherapy, it is advisable to choose medictions that have a complex effect on the pathogenetic mechanisms of the underlying disease and concomitant AD, which include Tenoten for children.

Background: Our sense of direction (SOD) ability relies on the sensory integration of both visual information and self-motion cues from the proprioceptive and vestibular systems. Here, we assess how dysfunction of the vestibular system impacts perceived SOD in varying vestibular disorders, and secondly, we explore the effects of dizziness, migraine and psychological symptoms on SOD ability in patient and control groups., Methods: 87 patients with vestibular disorder and 69 control subjects were assessed with validated symptom and SOD questionnaires (Santa Barbara Sense of Direction scale and the Object Perspective test)., Results: While patients with vestibular disorders performed significantly worse than controls at the group level, only central and functional disorders (vestibular migraine and persistent postural perceptual dizziness), not peripheral disorders (benign-paroxysmal positional vertigo, bilateral vestibular failure and Meniere's disease) showed significant differences compared to controls on the level of individual vestibular groups. Additionally, orientational abilities associated strongly with spatial anxiety and showed clear separation from general dizziness and psychological factors in both patient and control groups., Conclusions: SOD appears to be less affected by peripheral vestibular dysfunction than by functional and/or central diagnoses, indicating that higher level disruptions to central vestibular processing networks may impact SOD more than reductions in sensory peripheral inputs. Additionally, spatial anxiety is highly associated with orientational abilities in both patients and control subjects.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary program, including Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), in the treatment of patients with chronic migraine (CM) and concomitant chronic insomnia (CI)., Material and Methods: The study included 96 patients with CM and CI, average age 35.7±8.6. All patients underwent clinical interviews and testing using clinical and psychological techniques. Patients were randomized into two groups: group 1 received study treatment (an multudisciplinary program including CBT for pain and insomnia, combined with standard treatment for migraine), group 2 received standard treatment for migraine (preventive and acute pharmacotherapy for migraine, recommendations about lifestyle and sleep hygiene). All patients were assessed for clinical and psychological parameters before treatment and at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months follow-up., Results: At 3 month follow-up a statistically significant improvement was observed in group 1: a decrease in the frequency of headaches and the use of painkillers, parameters on the Insomnia Severity Index (ITI), the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), the Beck Depression Inventory, and the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) ( p <0.05). At 6, 12 and 18 months follow-up the achieved improvements were maintained. At 3 month follow-up, group 2 showed a statistically significant improvement in only 4 parameters: a decrease in the frequency of headaches and painkiller use, and parameters for ITI and MIDAS. These parameters increased to values that were not statistically significantly different from the parameters before treatment in group 2 at 6 month follow-up. At 3 month follow-up in group 165% of patients achieved clinical effect (CE) according to CM (headache frequency decreased by 50% or more), in group 2 - 40%, which was not statistically significantly different ( p >0.001); in group 1, 76% of patients achieved CE according to CI (ITI decreased by 8 points or more), which is statistically significantly more than in group 2 with 45% of patients with CE ( p <0.001). At 18 month follow-up, in group 1, 81.5% of patients achieved CE according to CM, which is statistically significantly more than in group 2 with 33% of patients with CE ( p <0.001); in group 1, 85% of patients achieved CE according to CI, which is statistically significantly more than in group 2, where 38% of patients had CE ( p <0.001)., Conclusion: High effectiveness of CBT in patients with CM and combined CI was noted.

Purpose of Review: This article provides an overview of the application of CBT in the management of episodic migraine while also providing context and insight into the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms of therapeutic change. It discusses the theoretical foundations of CBT and highlights key components including education, cognitive restructuring, behavioral interventions, relaxation techniques, and lifestyle changes., Recent Findings: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an empirically based treatment that is well suited for the management of episodic migraine. Although first-line treatments of migraine are typically pharmacological, a review of empirical literature suggests growing evidence for the use of CBT as a standard non-pharmacological treatment of headache conditions. In summary, this article explores evidence supporting the efficacy of CBT in reducing the frequency, intensity, and duration of migraine attacks as well as improving the quality of life and psychological well-being of those with episodic migraine., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: The aim of this study was to explore patients' experiences and management of pain in connection with a migraine attack in episodic migraine., Design, Setting and Subjects: This qualitative study used a semi-structured interview format based on functional behavioural analysis as commonly used in cognitive behavioural therapy. We interviewed eight participants and analysed their responses using systematic text condensation., Results: Participants' descriptions of their experiences and management of pain from episodic migraine were sorted into three description First physical sensations, Automatic reactions and Acts according to the interpretation., Conclusion: From a biopsychosocial perspective, a migraine attack is much more complex than just an experience of pain. The purely biological pain prompts a number of automatic reactions leading to strategies for pain management.

The article presents an original method for the automatic assessment of the quality of event-related potentials (ERPs), based on the calculation of the coefficient ε, which describes the compliance of recorded ERPs with some statistically significant parameters. This method was used to analyze the neuropsychological EEG monitoring of patients suffering from migraines. The frequency of migraine attacks was correlated with the spatial distribution of the coefficients ε, calculated for EEG channels. More than 15 migraine attacks per month was accompanied by an increase in calculated values in the occipital region. Patients with infrequent migraines exhibited maximum quality in the frontal areas. The automatic analysis of spatial maps of the coefficient ε demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the two analyzed groups with different means of migraine attack numbers per month., (© 2023. Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.)

Migraine headaches are among the most prevalent and disabling pain conditions worldwide. Best-practice migraine management is multidisciplinary and includes the psychological approaches to address cognitive, behavioral, and affective factors that worsen pain, distress, and disability. The psychological interventions with the strongest research support are relaxation strategies, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and biofeedback, though the quality of clinical trials for all psychological interventions needs continued improvement. The efficacy of psychological interventions may be improved by validating technology-based delivery systems, developing interventions for trauma and life stress, and precision medicine approaches matching treatments to patients based on specific clinical characteristics., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Psychiatric comorbidity is common among migraineurs, such as anxiety and depression. This type of comorbidity contributed to migraine chronicity, management efficacy, and increasing the risk for other comorbidities. This study designed to estimate the prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress (DAS) symptoms among Saudi migraine patients using the validated instrument (DASS-21) and considering socio-demographic factors and individual differences that affect migraine progression and prognosis. Design/methods: Cross-sectional, self-administered, web-based-questionnaire distributed among Saudi Arabia general population. Only migraine patients with clinical diagnosis allowed to complete the survey. Results: A total of 247 migraine patients participated and they are predominantly females, with ages between 16 and 45 years, Saudi nationals, married, non-smokers but do not exercise regularly. About 73.3% met the abnormal score in anxiety on DASS-21, as well as 70.9% in depression and 72.3% in stress. Four statistically significant correlations with DAS were identified. Migraine patients who are smoking have a higher prevalence of depression and stress ( p  < 0.05). Those who do not exercise regularly have a higher prevalence only for depression ( p  = 0.03). A higher prevalence of all emotional states was found in patients with more than one co-morbidity and patients with a clinical diagnosis of depression and anxiety disorders ( p  < 0.02). The sensitivity of DASS-21 for depression and anxiety are 96.9% and 93.3%, respectively. Conclusions: Both smoking cessation and exercise to prevent migraine attacks deserve a clinical trial. A holistic approach is needed to decrease psychiatry-related disability and promote management outcomes in migraineurs. Using DASS-21 for migraine patients as a routine screening instrument is valuable to prevent psychiatric comorbidity.

Objectives: The study aims to determine the relationship of migraine and chronic tension-type headache (TTHs) with alterations in the salivary markers of inflammation ., Methods: The prospective study involved 75 patients . The concentrations of inflammatory markers (CRP, IL-1 β, and IL-6) in migraine and chronic TTH patients were determined in distinct time points: headache-free period (interictal period), during headache (ictal period), day after headache attack. The STAI-Y (State Trait Anxiety Inventory - Y) and BDI (Beck Depression Inventory) questionnaires were used to measure the level of anxiety and depression in the interictal and ictal periods., Results: The interictal levels of CRP, IL1-β, and IL-6 were significantly higher in headache groups compared to healthy controls (p < 0.001). Differences in the ictal concentrations were even stronger. Twenty-four hours after headache attack, patients with migraine and chronic TTH experienced a decrease in CRP, IL1-β, and IL-6 levels; yet, those levels were still higher compared with the interictal ones. The repeated analysis of variance revealed no significant statistical differences in CRP, IL-β, and IL-6 levels between the migraine and TTH groups over time (p > 0.05). Statistically higher levels of anxiety and depression were seen in unhealthy groups (p < 0.01)., Conclusions: The relationship of CRP, IL1-β, and IL-6 concentrations with migraine and chronic TTH has been established. No statistically significant differences were found in the dynamics between migraine and chronic TTH groups. There was a direct correlation of migraine and chronic TTH with anxiety and depression.

Background: Migraine is a neurological disease that has several physical and psychological complications, which is characterized by disability and impaired quality of life., Aims: The aim of this study was to explore the mediating role of pain self-efficacy in the relationship between meaning of life, perceived social support, spiritual well-being and pain catastrophizing with quality of life in migraine sufferers. The relationship between these factors with quality of life (QOL) was not fully explored in migraine patients., Method: This study was a correlational study of structural equations. Therefore, 300 patients with migraine who referred to one of the specialized neurological treatment centers in Zanjan in 2021 were recruited based on the inclusion criteria. Patients also completed the World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale (WHOQOL-BREF), Meaning in Life Questionnaire, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, Spiritual Well-Being Scale, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire. Finally, the hypotheses were then analyzed with correlation coefficient and path analysis method by using SPSS-26 and LISREL-10.2 programs., Results: The results of the present study showed that pain self-efficacy has a mediating role in the relationship between meaning of life and quality of life (B = 0.015), perceived social support with quality of life (B = 0.022), spiritual well-being with quality of life (B = 0.021), as well as pain catastrophizing with quality of life (B = - 0.015)., Conclusion: According to the results of this study, by considering the role of self-efficacy of pain, it is possible to develop the programs to strengthen and improve the meaning of life, perceived social support, spiritual well-being and also reduce pain catastrophizing, in order to improve the quality of life of patients with migraine., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Introduction: We aimed to define the prevalence of objective cognitive impairment in a group of chronic migraineurs, and to define how migraineurs with cognitive impairment differed from those without impairment, and in doing so to compare cognitive impairment in chronic migraine to another chronic headache-related disorder already associated with cognitive impairment (i.e. pseudotumor cerebri syndrome)., Objectives: Cognitive impairment in migraine, especially chronic migraine, has been too little studied. Only a few studies have been done, demonstrating that cognitive impairment exists in chronic migraineurs. It is not known how this compares to other headache-related conditions., Material and Methods: We administered a cognitive battery consisting of the National Adult Reading Test, Mini-Mental Status Examination, Digit Span, Boston Naming Test, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Trail Making Test, Controlled Oral Word Association, and Category Fluency. Cognitive impairment was defined as mild single-domain with one test score, and mild multi- -domain with two scores more than two standard deviations below the mean for age-, gender-, and education-adjusted norms. The data from this study was compared to our previously published population of patients with pseudotumor cerebri syndrome., Results: One hundred prospectively recruited patients with chronic migraine were enrolled. Fifty-seven patients had normal cognitive profiles. Forty-three patients demonstrated mild cognitive impairment, and more than half (n = 24) showed impairment in multiple cognitive domains. Migraineurs with multi-domain impairment had higher pain intensity, shorter duration of disease, were taking narcotics, had more impaired vision-related mental health scores, and worse social health scores. We found an association between objective cognitive impairment and subjective perception of impairment only when controlling for pain. We found no associations with depression and topiramate use. The mean composite cognitive Z score was no different in chronic migraineurs and patients with pseudotumor cerebri., Conclusions and Clinical Implications: Most chronic migraineurs have normal cognitive profiles, but a large proportion of them do experience mild cognitive impairment, especially in multiple domains. The impairment seen in migraine is similar to that in pseudotumor cerebri syndrome, which has already been associated with mild cognitive impairment. Cognitively impaired migraineurs are different from non-impaired/less impaired migraineurs in several ways, which may be an important factor in influencing their migraine treatment.

While a significant proportion of the population suffer from migraine, the existing research literature does not provide a clear indication as to whether migraineurs experience objective cognitive deficits outside of acute migraine attacks. This meta-analysis was conducted to investigate which cognitive domains if any were affected by migraine, by synthesising the existing research quantitatively. The meta-analysis was prospectively registered with the PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews (registration no.: CRD42019134138). A search of the electronic databases PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and PsycINFO was conducted for journal articles published between January 1980 and January 2020. Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria, allowing for the calculation of pooled effect sizes between migraineurs (with and without aura) and healthy controls in the several cognitive domains. During the interictal period, migraineurs demonstrated a moderate, negative effect on complex attention immediate and delayed memory, spatial cognition, and executive functioning. This effect was not attributable to migraine history, attack frequency, or participant age. However, the lack of performance validity testing, and limited data on mood symptomatology and migraine medication use in the included studies may be confounds potentially overestimating the magnitude of effect. Comparison with a clinical control group, which may have accounted for some these extraneous variables, was unable to be conducted. Recommendations for comprehensive future neuropsychological research are provided., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: The objective of this study was to explore patient preference for attributes of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitors for the preventive treatment of migraine and to describe differences in treatment preferences between patients., Background: CGRP inhibitors are a novel class of migraine drugs specifically developed for the preventive treatment of migraine. Clinicians should understand patient preferences for CGRP inhibitors to inform and support prescribing choices., Methods: Patients with migraine in the US and Germany were recruited to participate in an online discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey, which presented hypothetical treatment choices using five attributes: mode of administration, side effects, migraine frequency, migraine severity, and consistency of treatment effectiveness. Attribute selection was informed by a literature review and semi-structured patient interviews (n = 35), and evaluated using patient cognitive debriefing interviews (n = 5)., Results: Of 680 who consented to participate, 506 participants completed the survey and were included in the study (US = 257; Germany = 249). Overall, participants placed highest importance (preference weight, beta = 1.65, p < 0.001) on the treatment's ability to reduce the severity of migraine (mild vs. unchanged severity), followed by consistent treatment effectiveness (beta = 1.13, p < 0.001), and higher chance of reduced migraine frequency (beta = 1.00, p < 0.001). Participants preferred an oral tablet every other day (beta = 1.00, p < 0.001) over quarterly infusion, quarterly injections (p = 0.019), or monthly injection (p < 0.001). Preference for all treatment attributes were heterogeneous, and the subgroup analyses found that participants naïve to CGRP monoclonal antibody treatments had a stronger preference for oral therapy compared to those with such experience (p = 0.006)., Conclusion: In this DCE assessing CGRP inhibitors attributes, the main driver of patient choice was treatment effectiveness, specifically reduced migraine severity, and consistent treatment effectiveness. Further, patients exhibited an overall preference for an oral tablet every other day over injectables. Patients' experience with previous treatments informs the value they place on treatment characteristics., (© 2022 Biohaven Pharmaceuticals Inc. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Headache Society.)