Search

Your search keyword '"Michiel Luijten"' showing total 4 results
Start Over Author "Michiel Luijten"
4 results on '"Michiel Luijten"'

1. Implementing Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable (FAIR) Principles in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Research: Mixed Methods Approach

Author

Rowdy de Groot, Frank van der Graaff, Daniël van der Doelen, Michiel Luijten, Ronald De Meyer, Hekmat Alrouh, Hedy van Oers, Jacintha Tieskens, Josjan Zijlmans, Meike Bartels, Arne Popma, Nicolette de Keizer, Ronald Cornet, and Tinca J C Polderman

Subjects
Psychology, BF1-990
Abstract

Abstract BackgroundThe FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) data principles are a guideline to improve the reusability of data. However, properly implementing these principles is challenging due to a wide range of barriers. ObjectivesTo further the field of FAIR data, this study aimed to systematically identify barriers regarding implementing the FAIR principles in the area of child and adolescent mental health research, define the most challenging barriers, and provide recommendations for these barriers. MethodsThree sources were used as input to identify barriers: (1) evaluation of the implementation process of the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model by 3 data managers; (2) interviews with experts on mental health research, reusable health data, and data quality; and (3) a rapid literature review. All barriers were categorized according to type as described previously, the affected FAIR principle, a category to add detail about the origin of the barrier, and whether a barrier was mental health specific. The barriers were assessed and ranked on impact with the data managers using the Delphi method. ResultsThirteen barriers were identified by the data managers, 7 were identified by the experts, and 30 barriers were extracted from the literature. This resulted in 45 unique barriers. The characteristics that were most assigned to the barriers were, respectively, external type (n=32/45; eg, organizational policy preventing the use of required software), tooling category (n=19/45; ie, software and databases), all FAIR principles (n=15/45), and not mental health specific (n=43/45). Consensus on ranking the scores of the barriers was reached after 2 rounds of the Delphi method. The most important recommendations to overcome the barriers are adding a FAIR data steward to the research team, accessible step-by-step guides, and ensuring sustainable funding for the implementation and long-term use of FAIR data. ConclusionsBy systematically listing these barriers and providing recommendations, we intend to enhance the awareness of researchers and grant providers that making data FAIR demands specific expertise, available tooling, and proper investments.

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Linking the RCADS-25 to the PROMIS® pediatric item banks Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms in a general Dutch population sample

Author

Leonie Klaufus, Xiaodan Tang, Eva Verlinden, Marcel van der Wal, Lotte Haverman, Michiel Luijten, Pim Cuijpers, Mai Chinapaw, Benjamin Schalet, Public and occupational health, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development (AR&D), APH - Methodology, APH - Health Behaviors & Chronic Diseases, APH - Mental Health, Paediatric Psychosocial Care, APH - Digital Health, Graduate School, and Paediatric Pulmonology

Subjects
PROMIS, Depression, Linking, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, RCADS-25, Anxiety, Pediatrics, behavioral disciplines and activities
Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to link scores of the Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale short version (RCADS-25) to the metric of the PROMIS pediatric item banks Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms in a general Dutch population sample. Methods: The RCADS-25 and PROMIS pediatric item banks Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms were administered online to 2,893 Dutch children and adolescents aged 8–18. Assumptions for linking methods were checked. Linking was achieved by using three item response theory (IRT) and two equipercentile methods. For each method, the observed PROMIS metric scores were compared to the ones predicted from the RCADS-25 subscale scores using correlations, mean and SD of differences, and RMSD. Results: The assumptions for IRT-based and equipercentile linking were met. The IRT-based method using separate calibration with Stocking-Lord constants was considered the optimal choice for linking both RCADS-25 subscales to the PROMIS metric. Based on this Stocking-Lord approach, we created item parameters for RCADS-25 items and two crosswalk tables. Conclusion: The RCADS-25 item parameters and crosswalk tables presented in this study are sufficiently valid. Researchers can use these products to translate the RCADS-25 anxiety and depression subscales scores to the PROMIS metric in order to ensure comparability with the previous research.

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Linking the RCADS-25 to the PROMIS

Author

Leonie, Klaufus, Xiaodan, Tang, Eva, Verlinden, Marcel, van der Wal, Lotte, Haverman, Michiel, Luijten, Pim, Cuijpers, Mai, Chinapaw, and Benjamin, Schalet

Subjects
Adolescent, Psychometrics, Depression, Surveys and Questionnaires, Ethnicity, Quality of Life, Humans, Anxiety, Child, Anxiety Disorders
Abstract

This study aims to link scores of the Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale short version (RCADS-25) to the metric of the PROMIS pediatric item banks Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms in a general Dutch population sample.The RCADS-25 and PROMIS pediatric item banks Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms were administered online to 2,893 Dutch children and adolescents aged 8-18. Assumptions for linking methods were checked. Linking was achieved by using three item response theory (IRT) and two equipercentile methods. For each method, the observed PROMIS metric scores were compared to the ones predicted from the RCADS-25 subscale scores using correlations, mean and SD of differences, and RMSD.The assumptions for IRT-based and equipercentile linking were met. The IRT-based method using separate calibration with Stocking-Lord constants was considered the optimal choice for linking both RCADS-25 subscales to the PROMIS metric. Based on this Stocking-Lord approach, we created item parameters for RCADS-25 items and two crosswalk tables.The RCADS-25 item parameters and crosswalk tables presented in this study are sufficiently valid. Researchers can use these products to translate the RCADS-25 anxiety and depression subscales scores to the PROMIS metric in order to ensure comparability with the previous research.

Published
2021

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results