Search

Your search keyword '"Michelle McGowan"' showing total 9 results
Start Over Author "Michelle McGowan"
9 results on '"Michelle McGowan"'

1. Kentucky's abortion landscape, 2010 to 2019: an analysis of pre-Dobbs abortion disparities in a rural, restrictive stateResearch in context

Author

Mikaela H. Smith, Michelle McGowan, Payal Chakraborty, Robert B. Hood, Meredith P. Field, Danielle Bessett, Carolette Norwood, and Alison H. Norris

Subjects
Abortion, Policy, United States, Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270
Abstract

Summary: Background: Since 2010, many US states have passed laws restricting abortion providers’ ability to provide care. Such legislation has no demonstrated health benefits and creates inequitable barriers for patients. Methods: To examine how Kentucky's abortion policies coincided with facility closures and abortion utilisation, we conducted a review of state abortion policies from 2010 to 2019 using newspapers and websites. We calculated abortion rates (abortions per 1000 women ages 15–44) by state of residence and provision for Kentucky, the South, and the US using data from the CDC and Kentucky Department of Health. We calculated percentages leaving and from out-of-state, and analysed abortions by race, pregnancy duration, and method. Findings: Of 17 policies passed between 2010 and 2019, ten were enacted, including 20-week and telemedicine bans. One of Kentucky's two abortion facilities closed in 2017. The pooled average abortion rate in Kentucky (4.1) and for Kentuckians (5.8) was lower than national averages (11.8 and 11.1). An average of 38% of Kentuckians left their state for care, compared to 7% nationally. In 2019, the abortion rate in Kentucky was 5.8 times higher for Black patients than White patients (compared to 4.8 times nationally). The majority (62%) of abortions in Kentucky took place at 7–13 weeks' gestation. Interpretation: Abortions in Kentucky were less frequent than in the South and US. The larger Black-White abortion rate gap reflects race- and class-based structural inequities in healthcare. Without federal protections, abortion access in Kentucky will continue waning. Funding: This study was supported by a philanthropic foundation that makes grants anonymously.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

4. Engaging Adolescents and Young Adults in Decisions About Return of Genomic Research Results: a mixed-methods longitudinal clinical trial protocol

Author

Amy Blumling, Michelle McGowan, Cynthia Prows, Kristin Childers-Buschle, Lisa Martin, John Lynch, Kevin Dufendach, Ellen Lipstein, Melinda Butsch Kovacic, Bill Brinkman, and Melanie Myers

Abstract

Background To protect minors’ future autonomy, professional organizations have historically discouraged returning predictive adult-onset genetic test results and carrier status to children. Recent clinical guidance diverges from this norm, suggesting that when minors have genomic sequencing performed for clinical purposes, parents and children should have the opportunity to learn secondary findings, including for some adult-onset conditions. While parents can currently opt in or out of receiving their child’s secondary findings, the American Society of Human Genetics Workgroup on Pediatric Genetic and Genomic Testing suggests including adolescents in the decision-making process. However, it is not clear what factors young people consider when given the opportunity to learn genetic findings for themselves. We are examining adolescents’, young adults’, and parents’ (if applicable) decisions about learning genomic information for the adolescent. Methods We are enrolling assenting (ages 13–17) adolescents and consenting (ages 18–21) young adults in a prospective genomic screening study to assess the choices they make about receiving individual genomic results. Participants use an online tool to indicate whether they want to learn their personal genetic risk for specific preventable, treatable, and adult-onset conditions, as well as carrier status for autosomal recessive conditions. We are examining 1) how choices differ between adolescent and young adult cohorts (as well as between adolescents/young adults and parents) and 2) decisional conflict and stability across study timepoints. Results are returned based on participants’ choices. Qualitative interviews with a subset of participants explore decisional stability, adolescent/young adult engagement with parents in decision-making, and the impact of learning pathogenic/likely pathogenic and carrier results. Discussion This study explores decision making and decision stability between adolescents and parents (where applicable), as well as the ethical implications and impact of return of clinical-grade genetic research results to adolescents and young adults. The results of this study will contribute empirical evidence to support best practices and guidance on engaging young people in genetic research studies and clinical care that offer return of results. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04481061. Registered 22 July 2020.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

5. Returning integrated genomic risk and clinical recommendations: the eMERGE study

Author

Jodell E. Linder, Aimee Allworth, Sarah T. Bland, Pedro J. Caraballo, Rex L. Chisholm, Ellen Wright Clayton, David R. Crosslin, Ozan Dikilitas, Alanna DiVietro, Edward D. Esplin, Sophie Forman, Robert R. Freimuth, Adam S. Gordon, Richard Green, Maegan V. Harden, Ingrid A. Holm, Gail P. Jarvik, Elizabeth W. Karlson, Sofia Labrecque, Niall J. Lennon, Nita A. Limdi, Kathleen F. Mittendorf, Shawn N. Murphy, Lori Orlando, Cynthia A. Prows, Luke V. Rasmussen, Laura Rasmussen-Torvik, Robb Rowley, Konrad Teodor Sawicki, Tara Schmidlen, Shannon Terek, David Veenstra, Digna R. Velez Edwards, Devin Absher, Noura S. Abul-Husn, Jorge Alsip, Hana Bangash, Mark Beasley, Jennifer E. Below, Eta S. Berner, James Booth, Wendy K. Chung, James J. Cimino, John Connolly, Patrick Davis, Beth Devine, Stephanie M. Fullerton, Candace Guiducci, Melissa L. Habrat, Heather Hain, Hakon Hakonarson, Margaret Harr, Eden Haverfield, Valentina Hernandez, Christin Hoell, Martha Horike-Pyne, George Hripcsak, Marguerite R. Irvin, Christopher Kachulis, Dean Karavite, Eimear E. Kenny, Atlas Khan, Krzysztof Kiryluk, Bruce Korf, Leah Kottyan, Iftikhar J. Kullo, Katie Larkin, Cong Liu, Edyta Malolepsza, Teri A. Manolio, Thomas May, Elizabeth M. McNally, Frank Mentch, Alexandra Miller, Sean D. Mooney, Priyanka Murali, Brenda Mutai, Naveen Muthu, Bahram Namjou, Emma F. Perez, Megan J. Puckelwartz, Tejinder Rakhra-Burris, Dan M. Roden, Elisabeth A. Rosenthal, Seyedmohammad Saadatagah, Maya Sabatello, Dan J. Schaid, Baergen Schultz, Lynn Seabolt, Gabriel Q. Shaibi, Richard R. Sharp, Brian Shirts, Maureen E. Smith, Jordan W. Smoller, Rene Sterling, Sabrina A. Suckiel, Jeritt Thayer, Hemant K. Tiwari, Susan B. Trinidad, Theresa Walunas, Wei-Qi Wei, Quinn S. Wells, Chunhua Weng, Georgia L. Wiesner, Ken Wiley, Josh F. Peterson, Adam Gordon, Agboade Sobowale, Akshar Patel, Alanna Strong, Alborz Sherafati, Alborz Sherfati, Alex Bick, Alka Chandel, Alyssa Rosenthal, Amit Khera, Amy Kontorovich, Andrew Beck, Andy Beck, Angelica Espinoza, Anna Lewis, Anya Prince, Ayuko Iverson, Bahram Namjou Khales, Barbara Benoit, Becca Hernan, Ben Kallman, Ben Kerman, Ben Shoemaker, Benjamin Satterfield, Bethany Etheridge, Blake Goff, Bob Freimuth, Bob Grundmeier, Brenae Collier, Brett Harnett, Brian Chang, Brian Piening, Brittney Davis, Candace Patterson, Carmen Demetriou, Casey Ta, Catherine Hammack, Catrina Nelson, Caytie Gascoigne, Chad Dorn, Chad Moretz, Chris Kachulis, Christie Hoell, Christine Cowles, Christoph Lange, Cindy Prows, Cole Brokamp, Courtney Scherr, Crystal Gonzalez, Cynthia Ramirez, Daichi Shimbo, Dan Roden, Daniel Schaid, Dave Kaufman, David Crosslin, David Kochan, Davinder Singh, Debbie Abrams, Digna Velez Edwards, Eduardo Morales, Edward Esplin, Ehsan Alipour, Eimear Kenny, Elisabeth Rosenthal, Eliza Duvall, Elizabeth McNally, Elizabeth Bhoj, Elizabeth Cohn, Elizabeth Hibler, Elizabeth Karlson, Ellen Clayton, Emily Chesnut, Emily DeFranco, Emily Gallagher, Emily Soper, Emma Perez, Erin Cash, Eta Berner, Fei Wang, Firas Wehbe, Francisco Ricci, Gabriel Shaibi, Gail Jarvik, George Hahn, Georgia Wiesner, Gillian Belbin, Gio Davogustto, Girish Nadkarni, Haijun Qiu, Hannah Beasley, Hao Liu, Heide Aungst, Hemant Tiwari, Hillary Duckham, Hope Thomas, Iftikhar Kullo, Ingrid Holm, Isabelle Allen, Iuliana Ionita-Laza, Jacklyn Hellwege, Jacob Petrzelka, Jacqueline Odgis, Jahnavi Narula, Jake Petrzelka, Jalpa Patel, James Cimino, James Meigs, James Snyder, Janet Olson, Janet Zahner, Jeff Pennington, Jen Pacheco, Jennifer Allen Pacheco, Jennifer Morse, Jeremy Corsmo, Jim Cimino, Jingheng Chen, Jocelyn Fournier, Jodell Jackson, Joe Glessner, Joel Pacyna, Johanna Smith, John Lynch, John Shelley, Jonathan Mosley, Jordan Nestor, Jordan Smoller, Joseph Kannry, Joseph Sutton, Josh Peterson, Joshua Smith, Julia Galasso, Julia Smith, Julia Wynn, Justin Gundelach, Justin Starren, Karmel Choi, Kate Mittendorf, Katherine Anderson, Katherine Bonini, Kathleen Leppig, Kathleen Muenzen, Kelsey Stuttgen, Kenny Nguyen, Kevin Dufendach, Kiley Atkins, Konrad Sawicki, Kristjan Norland, Laura Beskow, Li Hsu, Lifeng Tian, Lisa Mahanta, Lisa Martin, Lisa Wang, Lizbeth Gomez, Lorenzo Thompson, Lucas Richter, Luke Rasmussen, Lynn Petukhova, Madison O’Brien, Maegan Harden, Malia Fullerton, Marta Guindo, Martha Horike, Marwah Abdalla, Marwan Hamed, Mary Beth Terry, Mary Maradik, Matt Wyatt, Matthew Davis, Matthew Lebo, Maureen Smith, Maya del Rosario, Meckenzie Behr, Meg Roy-Puckelwartz, Mel Habrat, Melanie Myers, Meliha Yetisgen, Merve Iris, Michael DaSilva, Michael Preuss, Michelle McGowan, Mingjian Shi, Minoli Perera, Minta Thomas, Mitch Elkind, Mohammad Abbass, Mohammad Saadatagah, Molly Hess, Molly Maradik, Nataraja 'RJ' Vaitinadin, Nataraja Vaitinadin, Neil Netherly, Niall Lennon, Ning Shang, Nita Limdi, Noah Forrest, Noheli Romero, Nora Robinson, Noura Abul-Husn, Omar Elsekaily, Patricia Kovatch, Paul Appelbaum, Paul Francaviglia, Paul O’Reilly, Paulette Chandler, Pedro Caraballo, Peter Tarczy-Hornoch, Pierre Shum, Priya Marathe, Qiping Feng, Quinn Wells, Rachel Atchley, Radhika Narla, Rene Barton, Rex Chisholm, Richard Sharp, Riki Peters, Rita Kukafka, Robert Freimuth, Robert Green, Robert Winter, Roger Mueller, Ruth Loos, Ryan Irvin, Sabrina Suckiel, Sajjad Hussain, Samer Sharba, Sandy Aronson, Sarah Jones, Sarah Knerr, Scott Nigbur, Scott Weiss, Sean Mooney, Sharon Aufox, Sharon Nirenberg, Shawn Murphy, Sheila O’Byrne, Shing Wang (Sam) Choi, Sienna Aguilar, S.T. Bland, Stefanie Rodrigues, Stephanie Ledbetter, Stephanie Rutledge, Stuart James Booth, Su Xian, Susan Brown Trinidad, Suzanne Bakken, Teri Manolio, Tesfaye Mersha, Thevaa Chandereng, Tian Ge, Todd Edwards, Tom Kaszemacher, Valerie Willis, Vemi Desai, Vimi Desai, Virginia Lorenzi, Vivian Gainer, Wendy Chung, Wu-Chen Su, Xiao Chang, Yiqing Zhao, Yuan Luo, and Yufeng Shen

Subjects
Genetics (clinical)
Abstract

Assessing the risk of common, complex diseases requires consideration of clinical risk factors as well as monogenic and polygenic risks, which in turn may be reflected in family history. Returning risks to individuals and providers may influence preventive care or use of prophylactic therapies for those individuals at high genetic risk.To enable integrated genetic risk assessment, the eMERGE (electronic MEdical Records and GEnomics) network is enrolling 25,000 diverse individuals in a prospective cohort study across 10 sites. The network developed methods to return cross-ancestry polygenic risk scores (PRS), monogenic risks, family history, and clinical risk assessments via a Genome Informed Risk Assessment (GIRA) report and will assess uptake of care recommendations after return of results.GIRAs include summary care recommendations for 11 conditions, education pages, and clinical laboratory reports. The return of high-risk GIRA to individuals and providers includes guidelines for care and lifestyle recommendations. Assembling the GIRA required infrastructure and workflows for ingesting and presenting content from multiple sources. Recruitment began in February 2022.Return of a novel report for communicating monogenic, polygenic, and family history based risk factors will inform the benefits of integrated genetic risk assessment for routine health care.

Published
2022

6. Seeking abortion care in Ohio and Texas during the COVID-19 pandemic

Author

Emma Carpenter, Hillary Gyuras, Kristen L. Burke, Danielle Czarnecki, Danielle Bessett, Michelle McGowan, and Kari White

Subjects
Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology
Abstract

Political and public health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic changed provision of abortion care and exacerbated existing barriers. We aimed to explore experiences of individuals seeking abortion care in 2 abortion-restrictive states in the United States where state policies and practice changes disrupted abortion provision during the pandemic.We conducted 22 semistructured interviews in Texas (n = 10) and Ohio (n = 12) to assess how state executive orders limiting abortion, along with other public health guidance and pandemic-related service delivery changes, affected individuals seeking abortion care. We included individuals 18 years and older who contacted a facility for abortion care between March and November 2020. We coded and analyzed interview transcripts using both inductive and deductive approaches.Participants reported obstacles to obtaining their preferred timing and method of abortion. These obstacles placed greater demands on those seeking abortion and resulted in delays in obtaining care for as long as 11 weeks, as well as some being unable to obtain an abortion at all.Political and public health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic - exacerbated pre-pandemic barriers and existing restrictions and constrained options for people seeking abortion in Ohio and Texas. Delays were consequential for all participants, regardless of their ultimate ability to obtain an abortion.During the COVID-19 pandemic, state executive orders and clinic practices exacerbated already constrained access to care. Findings highlight the importance of protecting timely care and the full range of abortion methods. Findings also preview barriers individuals seeking abortion may encounter in states that restrict or ban abortion.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

8. Ohio Under COVID : Lessons From America's Heartland in Crisis

Author

Katherine Sorrels, Lora Arduser, Danielle Bessett, Vanessa Carbonell, Michelle McGowan, Edward Wallace, Katherine Sorrels, Lora Arduser, Danielle Bessett, Vanessa Carbonell, Michelle McGowan, and Edward Wallace

Subjects
COVID-19 (Disease)--Political aspects--Ohio, COVID-19 (Disease)--Social aspects--Ohio, COVID-19 (Disease)--Ohio, COVID-19 (Disease)--Moral and ethical aspects--Ohio
Abstract

In early March of 2020, Americans watched with uncertain terror as the novel coronavirus pandemic unfolded. One week later, Ohio announced its first confirmed cases. Just one year later, the state had over a million cases and 18,000 Ohioans had died. What happened in that first pandemic year is not only a story of a public health disaster, but also a story of social disparities and moral dilemmas, of lives and livelihoods turned upside down, and of institutions and safety nets stretched to their limits. Ohio under COVID tells the human story of COVID in Ohio, America's bellwether state. Scholars and practitioners examine the pandemic response from multiple angles, and contributors from numerous walks of life offer moving first-person reflections. Two themes emerge again and again: how the pandemic revealed a deep tension between individual autonomy and the collective good, and how it exacerbated social inequalities in a state divided along social, economic, and political lines. Chapters address topics such as mask mandates, ableism, prisons, food insecurity, access to reproductive health care, and the need for more Black doctors. The book concludes with an interview with Dr. Amy Acton, the state's top public health official at the time COVID hit Ohio. Ohio under COVID captures the devastating impact of the pandemic, both in the public discord it has unearthed and in the unfair burdens it has placed on the groups least equipped to bear them.

Published
2023

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results