Search

OBJECTIVE Virtually no clinical trials for smoking cessation have been undertaken in bipolar disorder. Varenicline has shown efficacy for smoking cessation, but warnings about neuropsychiatric adverse events have been issued. We assessed the efficacy and safety of varenicline in euthymic bipolar subjects motivated to quit smoking. METHOD Clinically stable adult patients with DSM-IV bipolar disorder (n = 60) who smoked ≥ 10 cigarettes per day were randomized to a 3-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled varenicline trial and a 3-month follow-up. Study enrollment was completed from February 2010 through March 2013. Varenicline was dosed using standard titration, and smoking cessation counseling was provided to all patients. The primary outcome was defined as a 7-day point prevalence of self-reported no smoking verified by expired carbon monoxide level < 10 ppm at 12 weeks. Psychopathology and side-effects were assessed at each visit. RESULTS At 3 months (end of treatment), significantly more subjects quit smoking with varenicline (n/n = 15/31, 48.4%) than with placebo (n/n = 3/29, 10.3%) (OR = 8.1; 95% CI, 2.03-32.5; P < .002). At 6 months, 6 of 31 varenicline-treated subjects (19.4%) remained abstinent compared to 2 of 29 (6.90%) assigned to placebo (OR = 3.2; 95% CI, 0.60-17.6; P = .17). Psychopathology scores remained stable. Ten serious adverse events occurred (n = 6, varenicline; n = 4, placebo). Abnormal dreams occurred significantly more often in varenicline-treated subjects (n/n = 18/31, 61.3%) than in those receiving placebo (n/n = 9/29, 31%; Fisher exact test, P = .04). Eight varenicline-treated and 5 placebo-assigned subjects expressed fleeting suicidal ideation, a nonsignificant difference. CONCLUSIONS Varenicline shows efficacy for initiating smoking cessation in bipolar patients, but medication trials of longer duration are warranted for maintaining abstinence. Vigilance for neuropsychiatric adverse events is prudent when initiating varenicline for smoking cessation in this patient population. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01010204.

Background Targeting glutamatergic dysfunction provides an exciting opportunity to improve cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. One treatment approach has targeted inadequate antioxidant defenses at glutamatergic synapses. Animal and human data suggest NMDA antagonists worsen executive cognitive controls — e.g. increase perseverative responses and impair set-shifting. We conducted a preliminary study to test the hypothesis that l -carnosine, an antioxidant and anti-glycation agent which is co-localized and released with glutamate would improve executive dysfunction, a cognitive domain associated with glutamate. Methods Seventy-five symptomatically stable adults with chronic schizophrenia were randomly assigned to l -carnosine as adjunctive treatment (2 g/day) or a matched placebo in a double-blind manner for 3 months. Cognitive domains (executive dysfunction, memory, attention and motor speed) were assessed using a computerized battery at baseline, 4 and 12 weeks, along with psychopathology ratings and safety parameters. Results The l -carnosine group performed significantly faster on non-reversal condition trials of the set-shifting test compared with placebo but reversal reaction times and errors were not significantly different between treatments. On the strategic target detection test, the l -carnosine group displayed significantly improved strategic efficiency and made fewer perseverative errors compared with placebo. Other cognitive tests showed no significant differences between treatments. Psychopathology scores remained stable. The carnosine group reported more adverse events (30%) compared with the placebo group (14%). Laboratory indices remained within acceptable ranges. Conclusions These preliminary findings suggest that l -carnosine merits further consideration as adjunctive treatment to improve executive dysfunction in persons with schizophrenia.