Search

Introduction: The World Health Organization's (WHO) scalable psychological interventions, such as Problem Management Plus (PM+) and Step-by-Step (SbS) are designed to be cost-effective non-specialist delivered interventions to reduce symptoms of common mental disorders, such as anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The STRENGTHS consortium aims to evaluate the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and implementation of the individual format of PM+ and?its group version (gPM+), as well as of the digital SbS intervention among Syrian refugees in seven countries in Europe and the Middle East. This is a study protocol for a prospective individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis to evaluate (1) overall effectiveness and cost-effectiveness and (2) treatment moderators of PM+, gPM+ and?SbS with Syrian refugees. Methods and analysis: Five pilot randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and seven fully powered RCTs conducted within STRENGTHS will be combined into one IPD meta-analytic dataset. The RCTs include Syrian refugees of 18 years and above with elevated psychological distress (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10>15)) and impaired daily functioning (WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0>16)). Participants are randomised into the intervention or care as usual control group, and complete follow-up assessments at 1-week, 3-month and 12-month follow-up. Primary outcomes are symptoms of depression and anxiety (25-item Hopkins Symptom Checklist). Secondary outcomes include daily functioning (WHODAS 2.0), PTSD symptoms (PTSD Checklist for DSM-5) and self-identified problems (PSYCHLOPS). We will conduct a one-stage IPD meta-analysis using linear mixed models. Quality of evidence will be assessed using the GRADE approach, and the economic evaluation approach will be assessed using the CHEC-list. Ethics and dissemination: Local ethical approval has been obtained for each RCT. This IPD meta-analysis does not require ethical approval. The results of this study will be published in international peer-reviewed journals., European Union (EU); Horizon 2020; Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014–2020)

Background & aims: The incidence of tube feeding dependency seems to increase worldwide, and these children may remain on prolonged tube feeding for many months to years. The multidisciplinary clinical hunger provocation (CHP) program is an intensive inpatient intervention of usually 2–3 weeks, aimed at weaning children from tube feeding. CHP has been proven highly effective on the short term (80–86%), particularly when applied before the age of two years but long-term data are lacking. The aims of our study were to determine the long-term efficacy of the CHP program and factors associated with success or failure and to assess anthropometrics, feeding behavior, and medical outcomes at long-term follow-up. Methods: All tube-dependent children who underwent CHP at a tertiary hospital in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, between 2001 and 2014, and had a minimum follow-up of 12-months in 2015, were eligible to participate in this retrospective cohort study. During the CHP program, tube feeding is ceased stepwise to create appetite, according to a strict protocol. The program was defined successful if patients achieved oral intake and could be fully weaned from tube feeding following the CHP program. Acute malnourishment was defined as weight for height 1 SD within 3 months, chronic malnourishment as height for age

Background: Children with congenital malformations, mental retardation, and complex early medical history frequently have feeding problems. Although tube feeding is effective in providing the necessary energy and nutrients, it decreases the child’s motivation to eat and may lead to oral aversion. In this study, we sought to confirm our previous results, showing that a multidisciplinary clinical hunger provocation program may lead to quick resumption of oral feeding. Methods: In a crossover study, 22 children of 9 to 24 months of age who were fully dependent on tube feeding were randomly assigned to one of two groups: group A, intervention group (2-week multidisciplinary clinical hunger provocation program); and group B, control group (4-week outpatient treatment by the same multidisciplinary team). Patients failing one treatment were reassigned to the other treatment group. Primary outcome measures were at least 75% orally fed at the conclusion of the intervention and fully orally fed and gaining weight 6 months after the intervention. Results: In group A, 9/11 patients were successfully weaned from tube feeding (2 failures: 1 developed ulcerative colitis, 1 drop-out). In group B, only 1 patient was weaned successfully; 10/11 were reassigned to the clinical hunger provocation program, all being weaned successfully. Six months after the intervention, 1 patient had to resume tube feeding. In total, in the control group, 1/11 (9%) was weaned successfully as compared with 18/21 (86%) in the hunger provocation group (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Multidisciplinary clinical hunger provocation is an effective short-term intervention for weaning young children from tube feeding.

OBJECTIVES: Pathological food refusal (PFR) is not rare in young children with chronic conditions requiring prolonged tube feeding. We investigated whether these children could be weaned from tube feeding with a multidisciplinary hunger provocation program. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included children younger than 2 years with PFR who had been dependent on tube feeding for at least 3 months. They followed a multidisciplinary in-hospital program. During step 1, only 50% of the normal allowance was given by tube. During step 2, oral feeding was offered and completed up to 50% with tube feeding afterwards. During step 3, supplementary tube feeding was given at night. During step 4, only insensible loss (400 mL/m2), was replaced. When the child had started eating, parents took over feeding (step 5). Primary endpoints were eating without tube feeding while gaining weight at 3 and 6 months after discharge. RESULTS: Ten children (age 9-21 months; 7 girls) were exclusively tube fed for 7 to 19 months. Hospital stay lasted 9 to 33 days (mean 17.3 days). All children but 1 remained in clinically stable condition and started to eat within 1 week. Weight loss was 3.7% to 15.6% (mean 9.2%); in 1 child, the program was discontinued because of excessive weight loss. At follow-up after 3 and 6 months, 9 of 10 and 8 of 10 children, respectively, were eating adequately and gaining weight without tube feeding. Two children with recurrent infections resumed partial (25%-50%) tube feeding during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The multidisciplinary hunger provocation program seems to be a promising method to promote discontinuation of tube feeding in young children