Search

Background: Patients on immunosuppressive drugs have been excluded from COVID-19 vaccines trials, creating concerns regarding their efficacy. Aims: To explore the humoral response to COVID-19 vaccines in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) Methods: Effectiveness and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccine in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Treated with Immunomodulatory or Biological Drugs (ESCAPE-IBD) is a prospective, multicentre study promoted by the Italian Group for the study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. We present data on serological response eight weeks after the second dose of COVID-19 vaccination in IBD patients and healthy controls (HCs). Results: 1076 patients with IBD and 1126 HCs were analyzed. Seropositivity for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG was reported for most IBD patients, even if with a lesser rate compared with HCs (92.1% vs. 97.9%; p

Background Anemia is a common extraintestinal manifestation of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with a 6% to 74% prevalence and a negative impact on patient survival and quality of life, although the prevalence is apparently declining due to improved disease treatment. We aimed to investigate the prevalence, pathogenesis, and clinical correlates of anemia in Italian patients with IBD. Methods A multicenter, prospective, observational study, involving 28 Italian gastroenterology centers, was conducted to investigate the epidemiology and consequences of IBD-associated anemia. Clinical and laboratory data of anemic patients were obtained at study enrolment. Results Anemia was diagnosed in 737 of 5416 adult IBD outpatients (prevalence 13.6%); females were more commonly affected than males (odds ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2–1.7) and had more severe anemia. In the majority of cases, anemia was due to iron deficiency (62.5% of cases; 95% CI, 58.3%–66.6%), either isolated or in association with inflammation and/or vitamin deficiencies; anemia of inflammation accounted for only 8.3% of cases. More severe anemia was associated with increasing fatigue and worse quality of life. Only 68.9% of anemic patients with iron deficiency (95% CI, 63.4%–73.8%) and 34.6% of those with vitamin deficiencies (95% CI, 26.2%–44.2%) were properly treated with supplementation therapy. Conclusions In Italy, the prevalence of IBD-associated anemia is lower than previously reported. Anemia of IBD is most commonly due to iron deficiency and contributes to fatigue and poor quality of life, but remains untreated in a large proportion of patients with iron and/or vitamin deficiencies. This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02872376.

The management of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis has undergone significant changes over the past 15 years due to the regulatory approval of several new drugs. In particular, following the approval of the first biological, i.e. infliximab, a number of further biological drugs, such as adalimumab, golimumab, vedolizumab and ustekinumab, and small molecules, such as tofacitinib, have been approved, thus enriching the therapeutic armamentarium for ulcerative colitis. Choice of therapy must take into consideration not only the need to induce and maintain disease remission according to the patient's profile, but also age, co-morbidities, and prior treatments. To guide these decisions, the Italian Group for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease has developed clinical guidelines that supersede its earlier document from 2011. These new guidelines were developed following the GRADE methodology for rating the quality of the evidence and for determining the strength of the recommendations. This article presents the methodology and results, in the form of 20 statements with commentary on the use of the five biologics and tofacitinib for managing the intestinal manifestations of active ulcerative colitis and for maintaining remission. A separate technical review reports the analyses of the evidence upon which the present recommendations are based.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Restructuring activities have been necessary during the lockdown phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Few data are available on the post-lockdown phase in terms of health-care procedures in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) care, and no data are available specifically from IBD units. We aimed to investigate how IBD management was restructured during the lockdown phase, the impact of the restructuring on standards of care and how Italian IBD units have managed post-lockdown activities. METHODS: A web-based online survey was conducted in two phases (April and June 2020) among the Italian Group for IBD affiliated units within the entire country. We investigated preventive measures, the possibility of continuing scheduled visits/procedures/therapies because of COVID-19 and how units resumed activities in the post-lockdown phase. RESULTS: Forty-two referral centres participated from all over Italy. During the COVID-19 lockdown, 36% of first visits and 7% of follow-up visits were regularly done, while >70% of follow-up scheduled visits and 5% of first visits were done virtually. About 25% of scheduled endoscopies and bowel ultrasound scans were done. More than 80% of biological therapies were done as scheduled. Compared to the pre-lockdown situation, 95% of centres modified management of outpatient activity, 93% of endoscopies, 59% of gastrointestinal ultrasounds and 33% of biological therapies. Resumption of activities after the lockdown phase may take three to six months to normalize. Virtual clinics, implementation of IBD pathways and facilities seem to be the main factors to improve care in the future. CONCLUSION: Italian IBD unit restructuring allowed quality standards of care during the COVID-19 pandemic to be maintained. A return to normal appears to be feasible and achievable relatively quickly. Some approaches, such as virtual clinics and identified IBD pathways, represent a valid starting point to improve IBD care in the post-COVID-19 era.

The first infliximab biosimilar for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) was introduced in 2013, and today eight anti-TNF alpha biosimilars (three for infliximab and five for adalimumab) have been approved and licensed by the European Medicines Agency. Biosimilars present great potential in terms of cost saving and possible consequential reinvestment in the health care system. The increasing knowledge about the process of biosimilar development and use in IBD and the publication of many prospective clinical studies and real-life clinical experiences have progressively changed the point of view of IBD physicians. In the present position paper, the Italian Group for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease present and discuss their updated statements and positions on this topic, with emphasis on the concepts of biosimilarity and extrapolation across indications, safety and immunogenicity, interchangeability and switching, automatic substitution, and, finally, patient education about biosimilars.

The two main forms of intestinal bowel disease, namely ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease, are not curable but can be controlled by various medical therapies. The Italian Group for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IG-IBD) has prepared clinical practice guidelines to help physicians prescribe corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs for these patients. The guidelines consider therapies that induce remission in patients with active disease as well as treatment regimens that maintain remission. These guidelines complement already existing guidelines from IG-IBD on the use of biological drugs in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases.

Backgrounds and Aims: Endoscopic outcomes are increasingly used in clinical trials and in routine practice for inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] in order to reach more objective patient evaluations than possible using only clinical features. However, reproducibility of endoscopic scoring systems used to categorize endoscopic activity has been reported to be suboptimal. The aim of this study was to analyse the inter-rated agreement of non-dedicated gastroenterologists on IBD endoscopic scoring systems, and to explore the effects of a dedicated training programme on agreement. Methods: A total of 237 physicians attended training courses on IBD endoscopic scoring systems, and they independently scored a set of IBD endoscopic videos for ulcerative colitis [with Mayo endoscopic subscore], post-operative Crohn’s disease [with Rutgeerts score] and luminal Crohn’s disease (with the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease [SESCD] and Crohn’s Endoscopic Index of Severity [CDEIS]). A second round of scoring was collected after discussion about determinants of discrepancy. Interobserver agreement was measured by means of the Fleiss’ kappa [kappa] or intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] as appropriate. Results: The inter-rater agreement increased from kappa 0.51 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.48–0.55) to 0.76 [95% CI 0.72–0.79] for the Mayo endoscopic subscore, and from 0.45 [95% CI 0.40–0.50] to 0.79 [0.74–0.83] for the Rutgeerts score before and after the training programme, respectively, and both differences were significant [ P < 0.0001]. The ICC was 0.77 [95% CI 0.56–0.96] for SESCD and 0.76 [0.54– 0.96] for CDEIS, respectively, with only one measurement. Discussion: The basal inter-rater agreement of inexperienced gastroenterologists focused on IBD management is moderate; however, a dedicated training programme can significantly impact on inter-rater agreement, increasing it to levels expected among expert central reviewers. * Abbreviations: : SESCD : Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease; CDEIS : Crohn’s Endoscopic Index of Severity; Kappa : kappa statistics; IGIBD : Italian group for inflammatory bowel disease.

Background and aims Perception of quality of care is important in the management of patients with chronic diseases, particularly inflammatory bowel disease. Aims and methods This longitudinal study aimed to investigate variations of the Quality of Care through the Patients' Eyes (QUOTE-IBD) questionnaire scores one year after the basal evaluation in the Studio Osservazionale quaLita cUre malatTIe crOniche intestiNali (SOLUTION-1) study. Results Of the cohort of 992 patients, 936 were evaluable. The QUOTE-IBD score overcame satisfactory levels of more than the 80%, overall and in all subdomains except for the “Continuity of Care” sub-dimension (mean, 8.3; standard deviation, 1.49), scored satisfactory only by 34% of the patients. No significant changes in satisfaction were recorded overall, or considering patients subgroups. Significant differences were found at the end of the follow-up between physicians’ and patients’ perceptions of quality of care, with the former over-rating their performance in “Continuity of Cares” and under-rating “Costs”, “Competence”, and “Accessibility” sub-domains of the score (p Conclusion Perceived quality of care in a large cohort of Italian patients with inflammatory bowel disease remains unchanged after one-year follow-up and was not significantly affected by disease activity or therapeutic interventions. Differences between physicians’ and patients’ perceptions of quality of care should be taken into account.

a b s t r a c t Background: Endoscopic activity has become a therapeutic endpoint in inflammatory bowel disease. Aim of this study was to evaluate inter-observer agreement for endoscopic scores in a real-life setting. Methods: 14 gastroenterologists with experience in inflammatory bowel disease care and endoscopic sco- ring reviewed videos of ulcerative colitis (n = 13) and postoperative (n = 10) and luminal (n = 8) Crohn's disease. The Mayo subscore for ulcerative colitis, Rutgeerts score for postoperative Crohn's disease, Crohn's disease endoscopic index of severity (CDEIS), and the simple endoscopic score-Crohn's disease (SES-CD) for luminal Crohn's disease were calculated. A subset of five endoscopic clips were assessed by 30 general gastroenterologists without specific experience in endoscopic scores. Kappa statistics and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to measure agreement. Results: Mayo subscore agreement was suboptimal: kappas were 0.53 (95% confidence interval 0.47-0.56) and 0.71 (0.67-0.76) for the two groups. Rutgeerts score agreement was fair: kappas were 0.57 (0.51-0.65) and 0.67 (0.60-0.72). Agreements for CDEIS and SES-CD were good: intraclass correlation coefficients for the two groups were 0.83 (0.54-1.00) and 0.67 (0.36-0.97) for CDEIS and 0.93 (0.76-1.00) and 0.68 (0.35-0.97) for SES-CD, respectively. Conclusion: The reproducibility of endoscopic scores in inflammatory bowel disease remains suboptimal, which could potentially have major effects on therapeutic choices.

Background : Surgical resection of Crohn’s disease is followed by early recurrence in a high percentage of patients. Mesalazine has been shown to be effective in the prevention of post-operative recurrence, but some 50% of patients under treatment recur at 3 years of follow-up. Aim : To establish whether the mucosal concentration of mesalazine might affect the development of post-operative recurrence. Methods : Colon-ileoscopy was performed in 25 consecutive patients resected for Crohn’s disease. The mean time from surgery was 14 months. After the operation, all patients were taking oral mesalazine (Asacol, 2.4 g/day). Ten patients showed signs of endoscopic recurrence (apthae, ulcers, narrowing of the lumen) in the neoterminal ileum, five of whom also showed juxta-anastomotic colonic involvement. Fifteen patients were free of recurrence. At endoscopy, four biopsies were taken from the perianastomotic area (two specimens at the ileal site and two specimens at the colonic site of the anastomosis). The specimens were weighed and immediately frozen at −80 °C. Mesalazine concentration (ng/mg) was measured in tissue homogenates by high- performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. Fisher’s exact test was used for the statistical analysis. Results : The mean value of mucosal mesalazine concentration, expressed as ng/mg of tissue, was significantly lower in patients with recurrence than in those without recurrence both in the ileum (mean ± s.d.: 21.6 ± 28.3 vs. 70.9 ± 47.4; P = 0.007) and in the colon (25.8 ± 26.4 vs. 60.3 ± 32.5; P = 0.010). Conclusions : The mucosal conentration of mesalazine in the juxta-anastomatic area is significantly lower in patients with recurrence than in those free of recurrence. These data could suggest an association between mucosal mesalazine concentrations and the clinical effectiveness of the drug.

Background: Exclusive enteral nutrition is an effective method for inducing remission in active pediatric Crohn’s disease. Success appears to depend primarily on exclusion of free diet. Multiple dietary components may alter the microbiome, induce intestinal permeability affect the mucous layer or allow translocation of bacteria in animal models or cell lines. We hypothesized that the effect of EEN is due to exclusion of dietary components that may alter the microbiome or generate an acquired bacterial clearance defect. We developed a diet based on exclusion of these dietary components (Crohn’s Disease Exclusion Diet). Methods: Children and young adults with luminal active disease defined as a pediatric Crohn’s disease activity index (PCDAI) >7.5 and 3 received a 12 week structured diet that allowed free access to specific unprocessed fresh foods and restricted exposure all other foods. Patients received 50% of calories from a polymeric formula. PCDAI, HBI, CRP and ESR were reevaluated at 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was clinical remission at 6 weeks defined as PCDAI

P289 Concordance in IBD endoscopic scoring requires expertise and training: Preliminary results of an ongoing IG-IBD study M. Daperno1 *, M. Comberlato2, F. Bossa3, L. Biancone4, A. Bonanomi5, A. Cassinotti6, R. Cosintino7, G. Lombardi8, R. Mangiarotti7, A. Orlando9, A. Papa10, R. Pica11, F. Rizzello12, R. D’Inca13, on behalf of Italian Group for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IG-IBD). 1A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Gastroenterology Unit, Turin, Italy, 2Ospedale di Bolzano, Gastroenterology Unit, Bolzano, Italy, 3IRCCS Ospedale Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, Gastroenterology Unit, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy, 4A.O. Universitaria Policlinico Tor Vergata Roma, Gastroenterology Unit, Rome, Italy, 5A.O.U. Careggi, Gastroenterology Unit, Florence, Italy, 6L. Sacco University Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology, Milan, Italy, 7San Camillo Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy, 8A.O. Cardarelli, Gastroenterology Unit, Naples, Italy, 9V Cervello Hospital, Istituto di Medicina Generale e Pneumologia Reparto di Medicina Interna, Palermo, Italy, 10Catholic University of Rome, Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology Complesso Integrato Columbus, Rome, Italy, 11Universita La Sapienza, Gastroenterology Unit, Rome, Italy, 12Policlinico S. Orsola Malpigli-Universita Di Bologna, Di Medicina Interna e Gastroenterologia, Bologna, Italy, 13University of Padua, Padua, Italy

The introduction of biological therapies, particularly anti-TNFα agents, has revolutionized the management of inflammatory bowel disease in those cases which are refractory to conventional treatment; however these drugs are not risk-free and their use has substantially increased the cost of treatment. As marketing protection expires for original, first-generation biopharmaceuticals, lower-cost “copies” of these drugs produced by competitor companies—referred to as biosimilars—are already entering the market. In September 2013, the European Medicines Agency approved two infliximab biosimilars for treatment of adult and paediatric inflammatory bowel disease patients, a decision based largely on efficacy and safety data generated in studies of patients with ankylosing spondylitis and rheumatoid arthritis. For many clinicians, extrapolation practices and the general question of interchangeability between biosimilars and reference biologics are cause for concern. In the present paper, the Italian Group for inflammatory bowel disease presents its statements on these issues, with emphasis on the peculiar clinical characteristics of inflammatory bowel disease and the importance of providing physicians and patients with adequate information and guarantees on the safety and efficacy of these new drugs in the specific setting of inflammatory bowel disease.