Search

Next-generation sequencing offers opportunities for targeted cancer therapies and may identify pathogenic germline variants. Adolescents' perception of testing is not well understood. We surveyed 16 adolescents and 59 parents regarding motivations, attitudes, and knowledge related to paired tumor/germline sequencing. Participants generally had a good objective understanding of germline genetics and cancer risk, with parents scoring higher than adolescents. Nearly all participants were motivated by a desire to help other patients and to treat their child/themselves. Most adolescents reported involvement in the decision to enroll in the study. Study findings suggest important similarities and differences between parent and adolescent views.

Many components of decision science are relevant to clinical ethics practice. Decision science encourages thoughtful definition of options, clarification of information needs, and acknowledgement of the heterogeneity of people's experiences and underlying values. Attention to decision-making processes reminds participants in consultations that how decisions are made and how information is provided can change a choice. Decision science also helps reveal affective forecasting errors (errors in predictions about how one will feel in a future situation) that happen when people consider possible future health states and suggests strategies for correcting these and other kinds of biases. Implementation of decision science innovations is not always feasible or appropriate in ethics consultations, but their uses increase the likelihood that an ethics consultation process will generate choices congruent with patients' and families' values.

Purpose To determine whether oncologists intended to change treatment as a result of tumor sequencing, and subsequently, whether patients experienced an alteration of clinical management or derived clinical benefit. Patients and Methods A prospective survey of oncologists referring adult patients with rare, advanced, or refractory cancer to the Michigan Oncology Sequencing program was conducted from June 2014 to March 2015 to assess the use of and intent to disclose sequencing findings. Oncologists’ responses were compared with the referred patients’ self-reported survey responses, and a content analysis of disclosure documented in the medical record was performed. Medical records were reviewed retrospectively to determine if clinical management was informed or changed by sequencing results. Results Oncologists (response rate, 93%) referring 112 consecutive patients were surveyed. Medical records of patients were reviewed for changes in clinical management on the basis of sequencing findings. Oncologists intended to change the treatment of 22% of patients (n = 24) on the basis of sequencing findings. Of these patients, 37.5% (n = 9) had an actual change in clinical management. Thirty-four patients with postsequencing survey data reported that a results disclosure discussion did not occur, despite documentation of disclosure by the physician in the medical record. Conclusions Findings demonstrate that many oncologists view next-generation sequencing results to be potentially valuable in directing subsequent therapy for their patients; however, barriers in communicating results to patients and implementing them in clinical management remain.

OBJECTIVE. The advent of precision oncology complicates how clinicians and participants understand how clinical care and research interface. Here we examine how key stakeholders perceive the utility of, and evaluate the decision to participate in, genomic sequencing head and neck cancer research. The goal of this study was to highlight unique considerations for our community as this type of research proliferates across the country. STUDY DESIGN. Prospective multimethod qualitative and quantitative embedded ethics protocol. SETTING. Single-institution National Cancer Institute–designated academic cancer center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Multimethod study using paired surveys and semistructured interviews among patients and providers involved in a prospective precision head and neck oncology sequencing protocol (116 survey patient-participants, response rate 82%) with 18 interviewees. RESULTS. Participants were generally enthusiastic about enrollment in research, both to help future patients and as a way of giving back to the community. They described reliance on information from and trust in their cancer doctor regarding the decision to participate in research, but paradoxically there was discordance in how doctors and patients reported their respective influence in the decision-making process. Clinicians also stressed the importance in separating clinical and research-informed consent processes, although patients did not describe this tension. CONCLUSION. As we enter an era of increasing personalized medicine and targeted therapies, the relationship between clinicians, scientists, and patients plays a larger role in how we individualize and contextualize cancer research. Our data are another step toward the ultimate goal of respecting and protecting patients as participants in head and neck translational oncology.

PURPOSE We sought to generate informed and considered opinions regarding acceptable secondary uses of deidentified health information and consent models for oncology learning health care systems. METHODS Day-long democratic deliberation sessions included 217 patients with cancer at four geographically and sociodemographically diverse sites. Patients completed three surveys (at baseline, immediately after deliberation, and 1-month follow-up). RESULTS Participants were 67.3% female, 21.7% black, and 6.0% Hispanic. The most notable changes in perceptions after deliberation related to use of deidentified medical-record data by insurance companies. After discussion, 72.3% of participants felt comfortable if the purpose was to make sure patients receive recommended care ( v 79.5% at baseline; P = .03); 24.9% felt comfortable if the purpose was to determine eligibility for coverage or reimbursement ( v 50.9% at baseline; P < .001). The most notable change about secondary research use related to believing it was important that doctors ask patients at least once whether researchers can use deidentified medical-records data for future research. The proportion endorsing high importance decreased from baseline (82.2%) to 68.7% immediately after discussion ( P < .001), and remained decreased at 73.1% ( P = .01) at follow-up. At follow-up, non-Hispanic whites were more likely to consider it highly important to be able to conduct medical research with deidentified electronic health records (96.8% v 87.7%; P = .01) and less likely to consider it highly important for doctors to get a patient’s permission each time deidentified medical record information is used for research (23.2% v 51.6%; P < .001). CONCLUSION This research confirms that most patients wish to be asked before deidentified medical records are used for research. Policies designed to realize the potential benefits of learning health care systems can, and should be, grounded in informed and considered public opinion.

While family history (FH) collection is a core responsibility of pediatric primary care providers (PCPs), few details about this practice are known. We surveyed a random national sample of 1200 pediatricians and family medicine physicians about FH collection practices. A total of 86% of respondents (n = 289 pediatricians; n = 152 family medicine physicians) indicated that they collect a FH “always” or “most of the time” with 77% reporting collection at the first visit, regardless of whether it is a health maintenance or problem-focused visit. Less than half ask about relatives other than parents, siblings, or grandparents (36.3%). Among respondents, 42% routinely update the FH at every health maintenance visit while 6% updated FH at every visit. Pediatric PCPs use a variety of methods to collect a FH that is limited in scope and variably updated. Our results suggest that interventions are needed to help pediatric PCPs collect a systematic, efficient, and updated FH.

While the diagnostic success of genomic sequencing expands, the complexity of this testing should not be overlooked. Numerous laboratory processes are required to support the identification, interpretation, and reporting of clinically significant variants. This study aimed to examine the workflow and reporting procedures among US laboratories to highlight shared practices and identify areas in need of standardization. Surveys and follow-up interviews were conducted with laboratories offering exome and/or genome sequencing to support a research program or for routine clinical services. The 73-item survey elicited multiple choice and free-text responses that were later clarified with phone interviews. Twenty-one laboratories participated. Practices highly concordant across all groups included consent documentation, multiperson case review, and enabling patient opt-out of incidental or secondary findings analysis. Noted divergence included use of phenotypic data to inform case analysis and interpretation and reporting of case-specific quality metrics and methods. Few laboratory policies detailed procedures for data reanalysis, data sharing, or patient access to data. This study provides an overview of practices and policies of experienced exome and genome sequencing laboratories. The results enable broader consideration of which practices are becoming standard approaches, where divergence remains, and areas of development in best practice guidelines that may be helpful.Genet Med advance online publication 03 Novemeber 2016.

Background Implementation of precision oncology interventions poses several challenges to informed consent and patient education. This study assessed cancer patients’ understanding, expectations, and outcomes regarding participation in research examining the impact of matched tumor and germline sequencing on their clinical care. Methods A total of 297 patients (mean age: 59 years; 50% female; 96% white) with refractory, metastatic cancer were surveyed, including 217 who completed surveys both before and after undergoing integrated whole exome and transcriptome sequencing as part of a larger clinical research study. Results At baseline, the vast majority of patients expected to receive several potential direct benefits from study participation, including written reports of sequencing findings (88%), greater understanding of the causes of their cancer (74%), and participation in clinical trials for which sequencing results would make them eligible (84%). In most cases, these benefits were not realized by study completion. Despite explanations from study personnel to the contrary, most participants (67%‐76%) presumed that incidental germline sequencing findings relevant to noncancerous health conditions (eg, diabetes) would automatically be disclosed to them. Patients reported low levels of concern about study risks at baseline and low levels of regret about study participation at follow‐up. Conclusions Findings suggest that cancer patients participating in precision oncology intervention research have largely unfulfilled expectations of direct benefits related to their study participation. Increased focus on patient education to supplement the informed consent process may help manage patients’ expectations regarding the extent and likelihood of benefits received as a result of undergoing genomic sequencing.

Background: Promising disease modifying therapies for Huntington’s disease are now entering pivotal trials, raising questions of what patients and families consider successful outcomes. Consistent with an ongoing movement to incorporate patient preferences into the development of new therapies, we conducted a pilot study to assess Huntington’s disease community views on emerging DMTs to assist in planning large-scale studies of patient preferences. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with members of the Huntington’s community (manifest disease, at-risk, and family/caregivers). Participants were asked which symptoms they believed should be targeted with novel treatments, as well as potential benefits and tradeoffs of delaying symptom onset versus prolonging late-stage disease. Results: Participants (N = 14) emphasized the need for treatments improving cognitive and/or behavioral symptoms. Many wanted treatments that delayed symptom onset up to 5–10 years, though some considered shorter delays acceptable due to potential value in advancing research to help future generations. Concern regarding potential for prolonging later-stage disease was variable, with some participants uncertain if they would want a treatment that delayed onset but prolonged later-stage disease. Others stated that any delay in onset would be desirable, regardless of potential prolongation of later stage disease. Discussion: This study demonstrates a breadth of opinions among the Huntington’s disease community surrounding both the benefits and complex tradeoffs that might occur with disease modifying treatments. These preliminary findings will inform future large-scale studies of attitudes toward disease modifying treatments, which may ultimately guide the design and outcome measure selection for clinical trials. Highlights: In-depth interviews with the Huntington’s disease community were used to explore patient and family preferences regarding potential disease modifying therapies. Many wanted symptom delay of 5–10 years, though some considered shorter delays acceptable for altruistic reasons. Opinions on trade-offs varied, suggesting larger preference studies are needed to inform trial design.

In genomic medicine, the familiarity and inexactness of the term "actionable" can lead to multiple interpretations and mistaken beliefs about realistic treatment options. As part of a larger study focusing on public attitudes toward policies for the return of secondary genomic results, we looked at how members of the lay public interpret the term "medically actionable" in the context of genetic testing. We also surveyed a convenience sample of oncologists as part of a separate study and asked them to define the term "medically actionable." After being provided with a definition of the term, 21 out of 60 (35%) layperson respondents wrote an additional action not specified in the provided definition (12 mentioned "cure" and 9 mentioned environment or behavioral change) and 17 (28%) indicated "something can be done" with no action specified. In contrast, 52 surveyed oncologists did not mention environment, behavioral change, or cure. Based on our findings, we propose that rather than using the term "actionable" alone, providers should also say "what they mean" to reduce miscommunication and confusion that could negatively impact medical decision-making. Lastly, to guide clinicians during patient- provider discussion about genetic test results, we provide examples of phrasing to facilitate clearer communication and understanding of the term "actionable."

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Our objective was to assess and compare the attitudes of patients with head and neck cancer and their clinicians regarding the commercialization of genetic research data. We explored whether such opinions changed when profits from such transactions were used to fund 1) cancer research, 2) academic research generally, or 3) if patients were given personalized genetic information in return. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This qualitative analysis was nested within a prospective precision oncology genomic sequencing study in an NCI-designated cancer center. We conducted paired, semi-structured interviews with enrolled participants with head & neck cancer and with their doctors (medical oncologists, surgical oncologists, and radiation oncologists). Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded for analysis. Codes were developed through an iterative process until saturation was reached, and all transcripts were double-coded (and discrepancies reconciled) to ensure reliability. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We identified three main themes from the patients and clinicians: (1) Both clinicians and their patients were unclear about how the study protocol and informed consent form authorized patients’ genetic data to be used and commercialized in the future. (2) Patients with cancer were generally more comfortable than their clinician thought they were regarding the ongoing research use of their genetic data and commercialization thereof. (3) There is a strong interest among patients and clinicians in focusing academic medical center profits from commercialization back into the research program from which the data was acquired, rather than being invested into academic research more broadly. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Given patients’ strong feelings about the commercialization of their data, our results highlight the need for greater transparency—both with patients and with their clinicians—about potential future use of research data. Clinicians appear inclined to be particularly cautious regarding access to and commercialization of patients’ data, however patients generally hope that their data may be used to help future cancer patients. Explicit discussions with patients about specific future uses of profits derived from commercialization of research data can ensure both transparency and participation in future primary and secondary precision health research programs.

Background Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) are uncommon diseases and both are associated with marked increased risk of colorectal cancer. Methods We present a patient diagnosed in parallel with ulcerative colitis and FAP. Mutational analysis of the APC germline and somatic DNA was performed by sequencing. Results This patient's phenotype consisted of polyps only on the right side of the colon (cecum and ascending colon) whereas the area affected by ulcerative colitis (descending colon and rectum) was free of polyps on endoscopy and microscopic adenomas on histology. This raises the possibility that mosaicism or inflammation in the presence of active ulcerative colitis modified the phenotypic expression of adenomatous polyposis in the left colon. Mosaicism was excluded by DNA analysis. Discussion This case of a patient diagnosed with both inflammatory bowel disease and familial adenomatous polyposis offers potential insights into the distinct pathogenesis of cancer susceptibility within these syndromes, and suggests that a collision of phenotypes may influence their mutual presentation. Both of these conditions independently increase the risk of colorectal cancer.

Background/Aims: To describe the interests, decision making, and responses of consumers of direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing (DTC-PGT) services. Methods: Prior to 2013 regulatory restrictions on DTC-PGT services, 1,648 consumers from 2 leading companies completed Web surveys before and after receiving test results. Results: Prior to testing, DTC-PGT consumers were as interested in ancestry (74% very interested) and trait information (72%) as they were in disease risks (72%). Among disease risks, heart disease (68% very interested), breast cancer (67%), and Alzheimer disease (66%) were of greatest interest prior to testing. Interest in disease risks was associated with female gender and poorer self-reported health (p < 0.01). Many consumers (38%) did not consider the possibility of unwanted information before purchasing services; this group was more likely to be older, male, and less educated (p < 0.05). After receiving results, 59% of respondents said test information would influence management of their health; 2% reported regret about seeking testing and 1% reported harm from results. Conclusion: DTC-PGT has attracted controversy because of the health-related information it provides, but nonmedical information is of equal or greater interest to consumers. Although many consumers did not fully consider potential risks prior to testing, DTC-PGT was generally perceived as useful in informing future health decisions.

The therapeutic use of genomic sequencing creates novel and unresolved questions about cost, clinical efficacy, access, and the disclosure of sequencing results. The disclosure of the secondary results of sequencing poses a particularly challenging ethical problem. Experts disagree about which results should be shared and public input – especially important for the creation of disclosure policies – is complicated by the complex nature of genetics. Recognizing the value of deliberative democratic methods for soliciting informed public opinion on matters like these, we recruited participants from a clinical research site for an all-day deliberative democracy (DD) session. Participants were introduced to the clinical and ethical issues associated with genomic sequencing, after which they discussed the tradeoffs and offered their opinions about policies for the return of secondary results. Participants (n = 66; mean age = 57 (SD = 15); 70% female; 76% white) were divided into 10 small groups (5 to 8 participants each) allowing interactive deliberation on policy options for the return of three categories of secondary results: 1) medically actionable results; 2) risks for adult-onset disorders identified in children; and 3) carrier status for autosomal recessive disorders. In our qualitative analysis of the session transcripts, we found that while participants favored choice and had a preference for making information available, they also acknowledged the risks (and benefits) of learning such information. Our research reveals the nuanced reasoning used by members of the public when weighing the pros and cons of receiving genomic information, enriching our understanding of the findings of surveys of attitudes regarding access to secondary results.

Despite rapid technical progress and demonstrable effectiveness for some types of diagnosis and therapy, much remains to be learned about clinical genome and exome sequencing (CGES) and its role within the practice of medicine. The Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) consortium includes 18 extramural research projects, one National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) intramural project, and a coordinating center funded by the NHGRI and National Cancer Institute. The consortium is exploring analytic and clinical validity and utility, as well as the ethical, legal, and social implications of sequencing via multidisciplinary approaches; it has thus far recruited 5,577 participants across a spectrum of symptomatic and healthy children and adults by utilizing both germline and cancer sequencing. The CSER consortium is analyzing data and creating publically available procedures and tools related to participant preferences and consent, variant classification, disclosure and management of primary and secondary findings, health outcomes, and integration with electronic health records. Future research directions will refine measures of clinical utility of CGES in both germline and somatic testing, evaluate the use of CGES for screening in healthy individuals, explore the penetrance of pathogenic variants through extensive phenotyping, reduce discordances in public databases of genes and variants, examine social and ethnic disparities in the provision of genomics services, explore regulatory issues, and estimate the value and downstream costs of sequencing. The CSER consortium has established a shared community of research sites by using diverse approaches to pursue the evidence-based development of best practices in genomic medicine.

Polymorphisms of the dopamine receptor D4 gene DRD4, 11p15.5, have previously been associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) [Bobb et al., 2005; Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 132:109-125; Faraone et al., 2005; Biol Psychiatry 57:1313-1323; Thapar et al., 2005; Hum Mol Genet 14 Spec No. 2:R275-R282]. As a follow up to a pilot study [see Castellanos et al., 1998; Mol Psychiatry 3:431-434] consisting of 41 probands and 56 controls which found no significant association between the DRD4 7-repeat allele in exon 3 and ADHD, a greatly expanded study sample (cases n = 166 and controls n = 282) and long term follow-up (n = 107, baseline mean age n = 9, follow-up mean age of n = 15) prompted reexamination of this gene. The DRD4 7-repeat allele was significantly more frequent in ADHD cases than controls (OR = 1.2; P = 0.028). Further, within the ADHD group, the 7-repeat allele was associated with better cognitive performance (measured by the WISC-III) (P = 0.013-0.07) as well as a trend for association with better long-term outcome. This provides further evidence of the role of the DRD4 7-repeat allele in the etiology of ADHD and suggests that this allele may be associated with a more benign form of the disorder.

The ethical debate surrounding biobanks has focused on protecting donors’ welfare and privacy. However, little attention has been given to the ethical significance of donor interests that go beyond privacy and welfare (non-welfare interests [NWIs]), such as their concerns about the moral or religious implications of researchers using their donated samples. Using an experimental survey design with 1,276 participants recruited via Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk), we studied the potential impact of eight NWI scenarios on people’s attitudes toward research studies being performed on samples donated to biobanks by assessing willingness to donate, attitudes toward disclosure of NWIs, impact of timing and format of disclosure (number of NWIs disclosed on a page), and participant factors associated with willingness to donate. Baseline willingness to donate to biobanks prior to any mention of NWIs was comparable with previous studies, at 85% to 89%. Most participants wanted NWI disclosures prior to donation to biobanks, but far fewer favored specific consent. Overall pattern of responses showed that as participants receive more information about NWIs, willingness to donate decreases in a scenario dependent manner. Specifically, NWI concerns about profit seeking research and insurance risk assessment had the strongest impact, even greater than controversial issues such as reproductive research, regardless of political, religious, and most other characteristics of respondents. Based on the results, a schema of NWI types is proposed that could be used for further research and policy discussions.

Aim: To assess customer comprehension of health-related personal genomic testing (PGT) results. Methods: We presented sample reports of genetic results and examined responses to comprehension questions in 1,030 PGT customers (mean age: 46.7 years; 59.9% female; 79.0% college graduates; 14.9% non-White; 4.7% of Hispanic/Latino ethnicity). Sample reports presented a genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease and type 2 diabetes, carrier screening summary results for >30 conditions, results for phenylketonuria and cystic fibrosis, and drug response results for a statin drug. Logistic regression was used to identify correlates of participant comprehension. Results: Participants exhibited high overall comprehension (mean score: 79.1% correct). The highest comprehension (range: 81.1-97.4% correct) was observed in the statin drug response and carrier screening summary results, and lower comprehension (range: 63.6-74.8% correct) on specific carrier screening results. Higher levels of numeracy, genetic knowledge, and education were significantly associated with greater comprehension. Older age (≥60 years) was associated with lower comprehension scores. Conclusions: Most customers accurately interpreted the health implications of PGT results; however, comprehension varied by demographic characteristics, numeracy and genetic knowledge, and types and format of the genetic information presented. Results suggest a need to tailor the presentation of PGT results by test type and customer characteristics.

Postmortem brain studies have shown deficits in the cortical gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) system in schizophrenic individuals. Expression studies have shown a decrease in the major GABA-synthesizing enzyme (glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD67) mRNA levels in neurons in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in schizophrenics relative to controls. In the present study, SNPs in and around the GAD1 gene, which encodes the protein GAD67, were tested on a rare, severely ill group of children and adolescents with childhood-onset schizophrenia (COS) (n=72), in a family-based association analysis. Compared to adult-onset samples, the COS sample has evidence for more salient familial, and perhaps genetic, risk factors for schizophrenia, as well as evidence for frontal cortical hypofunction, and greater decline in cortical gray matter volume on anatomic brain MRI scans during adolescence. We performed family-based TDT and haplotype association analyses of the clinical phenotype, as well as association analyses with endophenotypes using the QTDT program. Three adjacent SNPs in the 5' upstream region of GAD1 showed a positive pairwise association with illness in these families (P=0.022-0.057). Significant transmission distortion of 4-SNP haplotypes was also observed (P=0.003-0.008). Quantitative trait TDT analyses showed an intriguing association between several SNPs and increased rate of frontal gray matter loss. These observations, when taken together with the positive results reported recently in two independent adult-onset schizophrenia pedigree samples, suggest that the gene encoding GAD67 may be a common risk factor for schizophrenia.

Background Childhood-onset schizophrenia (COS) is a severe form of the adult-onset disorder with a high rate of premorbid developmental abnormalities. Early symptoms of pervasive developmental disorder (PDD) have been reported in five independent studies of COS. In this study, we compared evidence for premorbid PDD as a nonspecific manifestation of impaired neurodevelopment seen in schizophrenia, or as an independent risk factor for COS. Methods Diagnosis of past or current autism or PDD was made according to the DSM-IV criteria. COS patients with and without PDD were compared with respect to neuropsychological, clinical, and neurobiological measures. Several candidate genes for autism were examined in the entire COS sample and the subgroup with PDD using the Transmission Disequilibrium Test (TDT) and Quantitative TDT (QTDT). Results Nineteen (25%) of COS probands had a lifetime diagnosis of PDD: one met criteria for autism, two for Asperger's disorder, and 16 for PDD not otherwise specified. Premorbid social impairment was most common feature for COS-PDD subjects. The PDD group did not differ from the rest of the COS sample with respect to age of onset, IQ, response to medications, and rate of familial schizotypy. Unexpectedly, two siblings of COS-PDD probands met criteria for nuclear autism. There was no difference between PDD and non-PDD groups with respect to initial brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures. However, rate of gray matter loss was greater for PDD ( n = 12) than for the non-PDD ( n = 27) subgroup (−19.5 ± 11.3 mL/year vs. −9.6 ± 15.3 mL/year; p = .05). None of eight candidate genes for autism were associated with COS or COS-PDD. Conclusions Premorbid PDD in COS is more likely to be a nonspecific marker of severe early abnormal neurodevelopment. However, the occurrence of two siblings of COS-PDD probands (17%) with nuclear autism remains to be understood.

e13016 Background: Despite increasing use of tumor genomic sequencing in clinical oncology, there is currently limited understanding of how oncologists interpret and apply this information to a patient’s clinical management. Methods: We surveyed oncologists who referred patients with refractory cancers to the Michigan Oncology Sequencing (MI-ONCOSEQ) program which uses integrative clinical sequencing to detect multiple classes of somatic and germline molecular aberrations including point mutations, amplifications, insertions/deletions, gene fusions, and outlier gene expression from June 2014-February 2015. Patients were also surveyed approximately 2 weeks after notification of completion of sequencing. In addition, we conducted chart reviews to ascertain how many patients’ clinical management was changed or derived clinical benefit as a result of sequencing. Results: Forty-three oncologists (37% female, 98% academic medical center practice), referring 112 patients ( M = 2, range: 1-9) completed the survey (response rate = 93%). Oncologists reported an intention to change 22% of patients’ treatment plans on the basis of sequencing results, with referral to a clinical trial (N = 12; 50%) as the most frequently endorsed intended change. However, few patients (N = 9, 38%) had an actual change in clinical management. Barriers identified included patient factors, ineligibility for identified treatment, and loss to follow-up/deceased. Of the 57 patients who completed post-sequencing surveys, 34 (60%) reported that results of sequencing had not been disclosed. However, patient records had documentation that results disclosure had indeed taken place in 41% of cases. Conclusions: Although expectation of enrollment in clinical trials is frequently proposed as the indication for genomic sequencing, practice barriers remain. These include lack of access to studies, severity of patient illness and challenges to effective communication of results.

Decreased levels of circulating adiponectin, a hormone secreted by the adipose tissue, have been found to be directly associated with obesity and hyperinsulinemia (Vona-Davis et al, 2007). The combination of the association of adiponectin with insulin resistance, support for an association of obesity with risk of colorectal cancer, and a previous report which found that adiponectin levels were inversely associated with risk of colorectal cancer suggest that the adiponectin pathway may contribute to colorectal carcinogenesis (Wei et al, 2005; Moghaddam et al, 2007; Vona-Davis et al, 2007; Fenton et al, 2008; Williams et al, 2008). An association between genes of the adiponectin pathway and risk of colorectal cancer was recently reported in a multicenter case–control study (Kaklamani et al, 2008). Kaklamani et al identified a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP, rs266729) in the adiponectin gene (ADIPOQ) that was associated with decreased risk of colorectal cancer. However, subsequent reports did not validate the findings of Kaklamani (Carvajal-Carmona et al, 2009; Pechlivanis et al, 2009). In response to this intriguing hypothesis and inconsistent data, we examined several SNPs in the ADIPOQ gene that were genotyped as part of an ongoing genome-wide association study (GWAS) (Gruber et al, 2007). We also specifically genotyped the variant rs266729 in 1062 colorectal cancer cases and 1062 matched controls.

Context Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most heritable neuropsychiatric disorders, and a polymorphism within the dopamine D 4 receptor ( DRD4 ) gene has been frequently implicated in its pathogenesis. Objective To examine the effects of the 7-repeat microsatellite in the DRD4 gene on clinical outcome and cortical development in ADHD. We drew comparisons with a single nucleotide polymorphism in the dopamine D 1 receptor ( DRD1 ) gene, which was associated with ADHD within our cohort, and a polymorphism within the dopamine transporter ( DAT1 ) gene, reported to have additive effects with the DRD4 7-repeat allele. Design Longitudinal cohort study. Setting National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. Participants One hundred five children (with 222 neuroanatomical magnetic resonance images) with ADHD (mean age at entry, 10.1 years) and 103 healthy controls (total of 220 magnetic resonance images). Sixty-seven subjects with ADHD (64%) had follow-up clinical evaluations (mean follow-up, 6 years). Main Outcome Measures Cortical thickness across the cerebrum and presence of DSM-IV– defined ADHD at follow-up. Results Possession of the DRD4 7-repeat allele was associated with a thinner right orbitofrontal/inferior prefrontal and posterior parietal cortex. This overlapped with regions that were generally thinner in subjects with ADHD compared with controls. Participants with ADHD carrying the DRD4 7-repeat allele had a better clinical outcome and a distinct trajectory of cortical development. This group showed normalization of the right parietal cortical region, a pattern that we have previously linked with better clinical outcome. By contrast, there were no significant effects of the DRD1 or DAT1 polymorphisms on clinical outcome or cortical development. Conclusions The DRD4 7-repeat allele, which is widely associated with a diagnosis of ADHD, and in our cohort with better clinical outcome, is associated with cortical thinning in regions important in attentional control. This regional thinning is most apparent in childhood and largely resolves during adolescence.

e12525 Background: Precision oncology relies on genomic sequencing to inform diagnostic and treatment strategies customized to an individual patient. Yet, as genome sequencing becomes more integrat...

Childhood-onset schizophrenia (COS), defined as onset of psychosis by the age of 12, is a rare and malignant form of the illness, which may have more salient genetic influence. Since the initial report of association between neuregulin 1 (NRG1) and schizophrenia in 2002, numerous independent replications have been reported. In the current study, we genotyped 56 markers (54 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and two microsatellites) spanning the NRG1 locus on 78 COS patients and their parents. We used family-based association analysis for both diagnostic (extended transmission disequilibrium test) and quantitative phenotypes (quantitative transmission disequilibrium test) and mixed-model regression. Most subjects had prospective anatomic brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans at 2-year intervals. Further, we genotyped a sample of 165 healthy controls in the MRI study to examine genetic risk effects on normal brain development. Individual markers showed overtransmission of alleles to affecteds (P=0.009-0.05). Further, several novel four-marker haplotypes demonstrated significant transmission distortion. There was no evidence of epistasis with SNPs in erbB4. The risk allele (0) at 420M9-1395 was associated with poorer premorbid social functioning. Further, possession of the risk allele was associated with different trajectories of change in lobar volumes. In the COS group, risk allele carriers had greater total gray and white matter volume in childhood and a steeper rate of subsequent decline in volume into adolescence. By contrast, in healthy children, possession of the risk allele was associated with different trajectories in gray matter only and was confined to frontotemporal regions, reflecting epistatic or other illness-specific effects mediating NRG1 influence on brain development in COS. This replication further documents the role of NRG1 in the abnormal brain development in schizophrenia. This is the first demonstration of a disease-specific pattern of gene action in schizophrenia.

Sleep disturbances in psychiatric disease have long been reported. However, research on sleep disturbances in child and adolescent psychiatric disorders is limited. We examined the relationship of sleep disturbance to clinical severity and co-morbid diagnoses (e.g. anxiety), for a population with childhood-onset schizophrenia (COS). Sixty-one COS patients underwent a medication-free inpatient observation period as part of an NIMH study of COS. Sleep quantity during the last 5-7 days of a patient's medication-free period was measured using safety records and daily nursing notes. Subjects were divided into two groups: "good sleepers" (>6 h) and "poor sleepers" (

Straub et al. (2002) recently identified the 6p22.3 gene dysbindin (DTNBP1) through positional cloning as a schizophrenia susceptibility gene. We studied a rare cohort of 102 children with onset of psychosis before age 13. Standardized ratings of early development, medication response, neuropsychological and cognitive performance, premorbid dysfunction and clinical follow-up were obtained. Fourteen SNPs were genotyped in the gene DTNBP1. Family-based pairwise and haplotype transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) analysis with the clinical phenotype, and quantitative transmission disequilibrium test (QTDT) explored endophenotype relationships. One SNP was associated with diagnosis (TDT p=.01). The QTDT analyses showed several significant relationships. Four adjacent SNPs were associated (p values=.0009-.003) with poor premorbid functioning. These findings support the hypothesis that this and other schizophrenia susceptibility genes contribute to early neurodevelopmental impairment.

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)is a common, multifactorial disorder with signifi-cant genetic contribution. Multiple candidategenes have been studied in ADHD, including thenorepinephrine transporter (NET1) and dopa-mine D1 receptor (DRD1). NET1 is implicated inADHD because of the efficacy of atomoxetine, aselective noradrenergic reuptake inhibitor, in thetreatment of ADHD. DRD1 is primarily implicatedthrough mouse models of ADHD. DNA from 163ADHD probands, 192 parents, and 129 healthycontrols was used to investigate possible associa-tions between ADHD and polymorphisms in 12previously studied candidate genes (5-HT1B,5-HT2A,5-HT2C,ADRA2A,CHRNA4,COMT,DAT1,DRD1,DRD4,DRD5,NET1, andSNAP-25). Ana-lyses included case-control and family-basedmethods, and dimensional measures of behavior,cognition, and anatomic brain magnetic reso-nance imaging (MRI). Of the 12 genes examined,two showed a significant association with ADHD.Transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) analysisrevealed significant association of two NET1single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) withADHD (P 0.009); case-control analysis revealedsignificant association of two DRD1 SNPs withADHD (P 0.008). No behavioral, cognitive, orbrain MRI volume measurement significantlydiffered across NET1 or DRD1 genotypes at analpha of 0.01. This study provides support for anassociation between ADHD and polymorphismsin both NET1 and DRD1; polymorphisms in tenother candidate genes were not associated withADHD. Because family-based and case-control methods gave divergent results, both should beused in genetic studies of ADHD. COL0010744 COL0006769

Background Childhood-onset schizophrenia (COS), defined as onset of psychotic symptoms by age 12 years, is a rare and severe form of the disorder that seems to be clinically and neurobiologically continuous with the adult disorder. Methods We studied a rare cohort consisting of 98 probands; 71 of these probands received a DSM-defined diagnosis of schizophrenia, and the remaining 27 were diagnosed as psychosis not otherwise specified (NOS) (upon 2–6 year follow-up, 13 have subsequently developed bipolar disorder). Two overlapping genes, G72 and G30 on 13q33.2, were identified through linkage-disequilibrium-based positional cloning. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at the G72/G30 locus were independently associated with both bipolar illness and schizophrenia. We analyzed SNPs at this locus with a family-based transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) and haplotype analyses for the discrete trait, as well as quantitative TDT for intermediate phenotypes, using the 88 probands (including COS and psychosis-NOS) with parental participation. Results We observed significant pairwise and haplotype associations between SNPs at the G72/G30 locus and psychotic illness. Furthermore, these markers showed associations with scores on a premorbid phenotype measured by the Autism Screening Questionnaire, and with age of onset. Conclusions These findings, although limited by potential referral bias, confirm and strengthen previous reports that G72/G30 is a susceptibility locus both for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

1515 Background: Rare monogenic disorders are often due to mutations that are highly penetrant, extremely rare, and strongly disrupt normal biology. Hereditary mixed polyposis syndrome (HMPS, OMIM ID %601228), is characterized by a mixture of atypical juvenile polyps, hyperplasic polyps, sessile serrated adenomas and an increased risk of colorectal cancer. Polyps appear to be inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion. The putative susceptibility locus initially mapped to 15q13-14, however, the genetic basis of this syndrome is not well understood, and no mutation or associated variants have been identified. Methods: Germline DNA from four individuals from a family with clinically and pathologically confirmed HMPS was subjected to massively parallel sequencing (Illumina GAII). Affected individuals had an average of 30x coverage of their exome and 10x coverage of their genome. Sequence calls were filtered using the criteria of ≥ 4x coverage, quality score over depth ≤ 50, depth of coverage ≤ 360, allele balance ≤ 0.75, number or MAPQ zero reads at locus < 4. Common variants were filtered out by excluding variants found in dbSNP (build131), 1000 Genomes Project, the Exome Variant Server or 80 unaffected controls sequenced by hybrid capture and whole exome sequencing. Polyphen2 and SIFT were used to predict pathogenicity of the novel, shared variants, and validated by Sanger sequencing. Expression levels of novel variants were examined in available tumor samples using qRT-PCR. Results: From the 32 previously unidentified nonsense, missense or splice site variants shared by the family members whose whole genomes were sequenced, only 5 (4 missense, 1 nonsense) were predicted to be damaging, leading to a small subset of novel candidate genes including ZNF426, which may be responsible for HMPS within this family. Conclusions: HMPS extremely difficult to accurately diagnosis and the genetic basis is unknown. Using next-generation sequencing we were able to detect previously unidentified low frequency allelic variants including a novel candidate locus.

Background: Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in Israel, and a leading cause of death among women regardless of their ethnic origin. However, younger ages at diagnosis, larger primary tumor size, and lower 5-year survival rate have been reported among Arab women compared with the Jewish women. Arabs have a high rate of parental consanguinity, ranging from 25% to 60% in different countries in the Middle East. Consanguinity leads to a higher probability of sharing alleles identical-by-descent and increased risks for autosomal recessive disorders. Methods: Genome-wide analysis of germline DNA from 32 breast cancer patients and 26 first degree relatives was performed using the Affymetrix Human SNP Array 6.0 or the Illumina CytoSNP12 genotyping platform. Probands were screened for mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 to exclude common forms of inherited susceptibility. Genotype data were analyzed using PLINK to screen for runs of homozygosity of at least 500 kilobases. Results: Long runs of homozygosity were observed in five samples, including two consanguineous Arab and 3 Ashkenazi Jewish probands. The largest region of homozygosity was on chromosome 10q23.1-25.3 which harbors several important candidate genes, including the tumor suppressor gene PTEN. Conclusion: Preliminary analysis of breast cancer patients from consanguineous families of Arab or Jewish descent provide suggestive evidence of recessive susceptibility to breast cancer. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 5612. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-5612

identified in patients from families that met the Amsterdam Criteria (AC I/II), whereas 3 mutations were found in patients from families that were AC I/II negative. The modified likelihood for a germline mutation (+LRmod )i n an AC I/II patient was 1.56 (95% CI: 0.47 - 5.18) and the modified negative likelihood ratio (-LRmod )f or ap atient not meeting the AC I/II criteria was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.39 1.69). We quantified the meaning of the AC I/II criteria to guide clinical choices about genetic testing in MSS tumors by multiplying the pretest odds by the +LRmod and the -LRmod. The probability of a mutation was modified from a baseline of 11.4% to 16.7% in AC I/II families, compared to 9.4% in AC I/II-negative families. Conclusions Germline MMR testing in high risk patients with MSS colorectal tumors identifies mutations in a small, but meaningful proportion of patients. The diagnostic yield is dependent on the strength of the family history. Modified likelihood ratios can be helpful to quantify the probability of a positive gene test for Lynch Syndrome, and can be applied to pre-test probabilities derived from clinical models.

Recent publications have reported an association between colon cancer and human papillomaviruses (HPV), suggesting that HPV infection of the colonic mucosa may contribute to the development of colorectal cancer. The GP5+/GP6+ PCR reverse line blot method was used for detection of 37 types of human papillomavirus (HPV) in DNA from paraffin-embedded or frozen tissues from patients with colorectal cancer (n = 279) and normal adjacent tissue (n = 30) in three different study populations, including samples from the United States (n = 73), Israel (n = 106) and Spain (n = 100). Additionally, SPF10 PCR was run on all samples (n = 279) and the Innogenetics INNO-LiPA assay was performed on a subset of samples (n = 15). All samples were negative for all types of HPV using both the GP5+/GP6+ PCR reverse line blot method and the SPF10 INNO-LiPA method. We conclude that HPV types associated with malignant transformation do not meaningfully contribute to adenocarcinoma of the colon.