Search

The rapid increase in the number of published articles poses a challenge for curated databases to remain up-to-date. To help the scientific community and database curators deal with this issue, we have developed an application, neXtA5, which prioritizes the literature for specific curation requirements. Our system, neXtA5, is a curation service composed of three main elements. The first component is a named-entity recognition module, which annotates MEDLINE over some predefined axes. This report focuses on three axes: Diseases, the Molecular Function and Biological Process sub-ontologies of the Gene Ontology (GO). The automatic annotations are then stored in a local database, BioMed, for each annotation axis. Additional entities such as species and chemical compounds are also identified. The second component is an existing search engine, which retrieves the most relevant MEDLINE records for any given query. The third component uses the content of BioMed to generate an axis-specific ranking, which takes into account the density of named-entities as stored in the Biomed database. The two ranked lists are ultimately merged using a linear combination, which has been specifically tuned to support the annotation of each axis. The fine-tuning of the coefficients is formally reported for each axis-driven search. Compared with PubMed, which is the system used by most curators, the improvement is the following:þ231% for Diseases,þ236% for Molecular Functions andþ3153% for Biological Process when measuring the precision of the topreturned PMID (P0 or mean reciprocal rank). The current search methods significantly improve the search effectiveness of curators for three important curation axes. Further experiments are being performed to extend the curation types, in particular protein-protein interactions, which require specific relationship extraction capabilities. In parallel, userfriendly interfaces powered with a set of JSON web services are currently being implemented into the neXtProt annotation pipeline. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Assessing the pathogenicity of genetic variants is a critical aspect of genomic medicine and precision healthcare. Over the last decades, the identification of genetic variants and their characterization has become simpler (advent of high-throughput sequencing technologies, analysis, and visualization support tools, etc.). However, the quality of assessments to distinguish benign from pathogenic variants is critical to inform clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes. In this article, we investigate the relationships using correlation tests between the characterization of genetic variants in the literature and their pathogenicity scores computed by two state-of-the-art assessment tools (SIFT and PolyPhen-2).

The importance of genomic data for health is rapidly growing but accessing and gathering information about variants from different sources is hindered by highly heterogeneous representations of variants, as outlined by clinical associations (AMP/ASCO/CAP) in their recommendations. To enable a smooth and effective retrieval of variant-containing documents from different resources, we developed a tool (https://goldorak.hesge.ch/synvar/) that generates for any given SNP - including variant not present in existing databases - its corresponding description at the genome, transcript and protein levels. It provides variant descriptions in the HGVS format as well as in many non-standard formats found in the literature along with database identifiers. We present the SynVar service and evaluate its impact on the recall of a genomic variant curation-support service. Using SynVar to search variants in the literature enables to increase the recall by +133.8% without a strong impact on precision (i.e. 93%).

The Swiss Variant Interpretation Platform for Oncology is a centralized, joint and curated database for clinical somatic variants piloted by a board of Swiss healthcare institutions and operated by the SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics. To support this effort, SIB Text Mining designed a set of text analytics services. This report focuses on three of those services. First, the automatic annotations of the literature with a set of terminologies have been performed, resulting in a large annotated version of MEDLINE and PMC. Second, a generator of variant synonyms for single nucleotide variants has been developed using publicly available data resources, as well as patterns of non-standard formats, often found in the literature. Third, a literature ranking service enables to retrieve a ranked set of MEDLINE abstracts given a variant and optionally a diagnosis. The annotation of MEDLINE and PMC resulted in a total of respectively 785,181,199 and 1,156,060,212 annotations, which means an average of 26 and 425 annotations per abstract and full-text article. The generator of variant synonyms enables to retrieve up to 42 synonyms for a variant. The literature ranking service reaches a precision (P10) of 63%, which means that almost two-thirds of the top-10 returned abstracts are judged relevant. Further services will be implemented to complete this set of services, such as a service to retrieve relevant clinical trials for a patient and a literature ranking service for full-text articles.