Search

Background: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) represent a group of medicaments inhibiting cyclooxygenase (COX) enzyme, and, in parallel, these drugs show also analgesic, antipyretic and anti-inflammatory effects. Due to their efficiency, good tolerance and easy availability, they belong to the worlds most used drugs. For decades, evidence of their anti-tumor activity has been growing, with the largest amount of published work being related to colorectal cancer (CRC). Based on both in vitro and in vivo experiments and data obtained from epidemiological and clinical studies, potential application of NSAID as chemo-preventive treatment for CRC patients is recently discussed in order to prevent development or recurrence of precanceroses and tumors. Promising treatment for such indication would be acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), which is the oldest, more than 100 years used member of the NSAID family. Nonselective irreversible COX inhibition is an important but probably not solely mechanism of its anticancer activity. Notably, wider use of ASA in chemoprevention is also prevented due to particular concerns about gastrointestinal and renal toxicity caused especially by its long-term use., Aims: This review introduces the role of COX in tumor biology of CRC and highlights the results of the most interesting experiments illustrating the anti-tumor effect of ASA. Moreover, our work evaluates the most important published clinical analyzes of the ASA chemopreventive effect on CRC and discusses the current state. Key words: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents - acetylsalicylic acid - colorectal carcinoma - cyclooxygenase - chemoprevention This work was supported by the projects MEYS - NPS I - LO1413, MH CZ - DRO (MMCI, 00209805) and by Czech Science Foundation project no. 16-14829S. The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study. The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE recommendation for biomedical papers. Accepted: 10. 9. 2017.

Background: Ferroptosis is a recently discovered type of cell death. It is genetically, morphologically, and biochemically distinct from other types of programmed cell death, such as necrosis, apoptosis, and autophagy. The level of intracellular free iron and reactive oxygen species formation are important for ferroptosis activation, which can occur through either of two key inhibitory processes. The first one involves inhibition of cystine transfer into cells by the cystine/glutamate antiporter system (Xc-). Cystine serves as a precursor for the synthesis of glutathione, a major cellular antioxidant. The second one involves the inhibition of glutathione peroxidase 4, which protects cells from lipid peroxidation. Ferroptosis is associated with many metabolic disorders, including neurological diseases and cancer. Molecules involved in the activation of ferroptotic pathways are involved in protecting cells against stress conditions, and in the maintenance of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate and glutathione levels, as well as iron homeostasis. Also important is the connection with autophagy, so called ferritinophagy, in which iron is released from lysosomes into the cytosol. Cascade reactions of free unstable iron atoms with other molecules result in the production of reactive oxygen species that initiate the cellular stress that triggers ferroptosis. In diseases such as cancer where cell death inducing mechanisms, including apoptosis, are usually suppressed by genetic changes, the induction of alternative pathways leading to cell death could provide an attractive treatment strategy., Conclusion: In recent years, research into new antimetastatic drugs has focused on the activation of alternative cell death pathways that might overcome disturbed metabolic processes inside cancer cells or the chemotherapy resistance acquired in the course of routine treatment. A number of molecules have been found to induce ferroptosis in tumor cells, suggesting that they may offer new alternatives for anticancer treatment. Key words: cell death - cancer - autophagy - ferroptosis - ferritinophagy - cellular stress - ROS This work was supported by the projects GAČR 17-05838S, MEYS - NPS I - LO1413 and MH CZ- -DRO (MMCI, 00209805). The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study. The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE recommendation for biomedical papers. Accepted: 31. 8. 2018.

Background: Due to the irreplaceable role of chemotherapy in cancer treatment, research has focused on improving the efficacies of individual drugs and minimizing, or completely suppressing, their negative side effects. Based on long-term experience and the results of clinical trials, the selection of appropriate treatment is currently based on classical clinical diagnostic criteria, such as tumor size, grade, and the presence or absence of standard markers. However, complications arise due to variability between patients and tumor heterogeneity. Characterization of intratumoral heterogeneity and acquisition of more reliable drug performance indicators should improve personalized therapy. Development and selection of suitable models are therefore important issues in cancer research focused on predicting sensitivity to therapy., Aim: This work provides an overview of various chemosensitivity tests that have been previously employed and those that are currently used. Great emphasis is placed on comparing 2D and 3D cell culture models, since their importance and popularity are increasing. Particular attention is paid to in vivo systems, which have significantly improved recently and are tested in clinical trials to predict responses to therapy., Conclusion: This work provides a brief overview of chemosensitivity tests, focusing on the importance of individual tests and their application in decision-making and patient stratification to improve the clinical responses of patients and the development of targeted personalized therapy.Key words: cell culture techniques - personalized medicine - drug screening - biological models - tumor cell lines - carcinoma - cytotoxicity assays This work was supported by the project MEYSNPS I-LO1413 and GACR 17-05838S. The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study. The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE recommendation for biomedical papers.Submitted: 21. 9. 2017Accepted: 20. 12. 2017.

In this study, we characterized the effects of LA-12 on tumor cell lines possessing wild type p53 and on p53-deficient/mutant cell lines and the results were compared to those obtained using cisplatin. We have determined changes of p53 levels, of its transcriptional activity, of its posttranscriptional modifications and the effect of the treatment on the cell cycle, on the induction of apoptosis and on gene expression. LA-12 induces weak accumulation of both transcriptionally active p53 tumor suppressor and of p21(WAF1/CIP1) protein. LA-12 and cisplatin also significantly differ in their effects on apoptosis and cell cycle and on gene expression spectra in studied cell lines. LA-12 induces higher apoptosis levels in comparison with those induced by cisplatin, especially in p53-deficient H1299 cells and in MCF-7DD cells with transcriptionally inactive p53. We suggest that LA-12-mediated apoptosis is not fully dependent on p53. This confirms the therapeutic potential of LA-12 as a more potent cytostatic agent for both tumor cells expressing wild type p53 and for p53-deficient or mutant cells.

Certain hope is entertained in the prediction of chemosensitivity in vitro/ ex vivo for the purpose of selecting the most effective treatment of malignant diseases with minimal patient loading. The possible choice of an effective substance based on the results of a simple ex vivo test would increase the success of the treatment in case of standard chemotherapy failure or in the treatment of primary chemoresistant tumor. MTT test seems to be an easy process for the prediction of chemosensitivity of isolated malignant cells ex vivo, however each method represents a simple tool, which can provide false results if incorrectly preformed. Numerous limitations significantly reduce the successful evaluation and constituent aspects of the methodic press to further reflections about the proper application of the test.

Chemoresistance assay results may play a role in cancer management decision process. Since August 2006 testing chemoresistance has been tested according to a protocol that was designed for this reason in our institute (Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute). Five groups of different types of cancer in particular clinical stages were defined for chemosensitivity testing with: (1) metastatic malignant melanoma, (2) soft tissue sarcoma (STS), either primary or recurrent/metastic, (3) primary or metastatic renal cancer, (4) recurrent ovarian cancer and (5) other diagnosis "on clinician's request". In the period from September 2006 to November 2007, 25 samples of malignant melanoma (reproducible results in 9 cases), 29 samples of STS (relevant data in 11 cases), 36 samples of renal cancer (relevant results in 20 samples) and 16 samples of ovarian cancer (reproducible results in 11 cases) were acquired. Sensitivity to certain chemotherapy agent observed ex vivo does not necessarily mean that the cancer would also be sensitive to the same agent in vivo, however, ex vivo resistance with following in vivo sensitivity of the tumour has not been observed to date. The cultivation of malignant cells is very uncertain in solid tumours, which consist of several malignant cell multiclones (benign/stromal cells may outgrow malignant cells). This cultivation uncertainty as well as the unique complexity of human metabolism makes clinical application of chemoresistance testing at least very questionable. The small number of successfully evaluated samples has not yet provided us to carry out proper statistical evaluation and clinical application.