Search

Background: A multistep pathogenesis of myeloid leukemia including mutations in epigenetic, spliceosome, and signaling genes has been recently demonstrated in a preclinical model but is poorly validated in patients. ----- Methods: Clinical, phenotypic, and biologic features were compared between three distinct molecularly defined CMML cohorts including TET2 monomutated patients (T, n = 10), TET2/SRSF2 bimutated patients (TS, n = 19), and patients who had NRAS mutations in addition to TET2/SRSF2 comutations (TSN, n = 14). ----- Results: Median survival was 90, 45, and 9 months, respectively (p = .001). Whereas no patient in the T and TS group transformed into acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 6/14 patients in the TSN group had AML at study entry or transformed during follow-up. Leukocyte counts, blast cell counts, and LDH levels were significantly higher in TSN vs. TS and T, respectively, whereas hemoglobin and platelet values were not significantly different. Increased growth factor-independent myeloid colony formation was restricted to TSN but not found in T and TS, respectively. The proportion of patients showing in vitro myelomonocytic skewing in T, TS, and TSN was 0%, 56%, and 100%, respectively (p = .010). ----- Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that the model of multistep pathogenesis in CMML can be recapitulated in patients regarding clinical, phenotypic, and biologic features.

In older patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML) and limited life expectancy due to age and or comorbidities, it is particularly important to consider the risk of transformation for individualised treatment decisions. There is limited information on potential differences between younger and older CMML patients regarding the cumulative risk of transformation as well as haematological, molecular and biologic characteristics. We analysed data from the Austrian Biodatabase for CMML (ABCMML) to compare these parameters in 518 CMML patients. Categorisation of patients into 3 age‐related groups

Mastocytosis is a hematopoietic neoplasm characterized by expansion of KIT D816V-mutated clonal mast cells in various organs and severe or even life-threatening anaphylactic reactions. Recently, hereditary α-tryptasemia (HαT) has been described as a common genetic trait with increased copy numbers of the α-tryptase encoding gene, TPSAB1, and associated with an increased basal serum tryptase level and a risk of mast cell activation. The purpose of our study was to elucidate the clinical relevance of HαT in patients with mastocytosis. TPSAB1 germline copy number variants were assessed by digital polymerase chain reaction in 180 mastocytosis patients, 180 sex-matched control subjects, 720 patients with other myeloid neoplasms, and 61 additional mastocytosis patients of an independent validation cohort. α-Tryptase encoding TPSAB1 copy number gains, compatible with HαT, were identified in 17.2% of mastocytosis patients and 4.4% of the control population (P < .001). Patients with HαT exhibited higher tryptase levels than patients without HαT (median tryptase in HαT+ cases: 49.6 ng/mL vs HαT− cases: 34.5 ng/mL, P = .004) independent of the mast cell burden. Hymenoptera venom hypersensitivity reactions and severe cardiovascular mediator-related symptoms/anaphylaxis were by far more frequently observed in mastocytosis patients with HαT than in those without HαT. Results were confirmed in an independent validation cohort. The high prevalence of HαT in mastocytosis hints at a potential pathogenic role of germline α-tryptase encoding TPSAB1 copy number gains in disease evolution. Together, our data suggest that HαT is a novel emerging robust biomarker in mastocytosis that is useful for determining the individual patient´s risk of developing severe anaphylaxis.

Background: Azacitidine is the treatment backbone for patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia who are considered unfit for intensive chemotherapy. Detailed reports on adverse events in a real-world setting are lacking. Aims: To analyze the frequency of adverse events in the Austrian Registry of Hypomethylating agents. To compare real-world data with that of published randomized clinical trials. Results: A total of 1406 patients uniformly treated with a total of 13,780 cycles of azacitidine were analyzed. Hematologic adverse events were the most common adverse events (grade 3–4 anemia 43.4%, grade 3–4 thrombopenia 36.8%, grade 3–4 neutropenia 36.1%). Grade 3–4 anemia was significantly more common in the Registry compared to published trials. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 33.4% of patients and was also more common in the Registry than in published reports. Other commonly reported adverse events included fatigue (33.4%), pain (29.2%), pyrexia (23.5%), and injection site reactions (23.2%). Treatment termination due to an adverse event was rare (5.1%). Conclusion: The safety profile of azacitidine in clinical trials is reproducible in a real-world setting. With the use of prophylactic and concomitant medications, adverse events can be mitigated and azacitidine can be safely administered to almost all patients with few treatment discontinuations.

Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare hematologic disease characterized by a deregulated complement system, chronic Coombs-negative, intravascular hemolysis, and a variable clinical course with substantial risk to develop thromboembolic events. We analyzed diagnostic and prognostic parameters as well as clinical endpoints in 59 adult patients suffering from PNH in 5 hematology centers in Austria (observation period: 1978-2015). Median follow-up time was 5.6 years. The median clone size at diagnosis amounted to 55% and was higher in patients with classical PNH (81%) compared to patients with PNH associated with aplastic anemia (AA) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) (50%). The clone size also correlated with lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels. In one patient, anemia improved spontaneously and disappeared with complete normalization of LDH after 16 years. Seventeen patients received therapy with eculizumab. The rate of thromboembolic events was higher in the pre-eculizumab era compared with eculizumab-treated patients but did not correlate with the presence of age-related clonal hematopoiesis or any other clinical or laboratory parameters. Peripheral blood colony-forming progenitor cell counts were lower in PNH patients compared with healthy controls. Only two patients with classical PNH developed MDS. Overall, 7/59 patients died after 0.5-32 years. Causes of death were acute pulmonary hypertension, Budd-Chiari syndrome, and septicemia. Overall survival (OS) was mainly influenced by age and was similar to OS measured in an age-matched healthy Austrian control cohort. Together, compared with previous times, the clinical course and OS in PNH are favorable, which may be due to better diagnosis, early recognition, and eculizumab therapy.

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) represent a heterogeneous group of hematological stem cell disorders with an increasing burden on health care systems. Evidence-based MDS guidelines and recommendations (G/Rs) are published but do not necessarily translate into better quality of care if adherence is not maintained in daily clinical practice. Guideline-based indicators (GBIs) are measurable elements for the standardized assessment of quality of care and, thus far, have not been developed for adult MDS patients. To this end, we screened relevant G/Rs published between 1999 and 2018 and aggregated all available information as candidate GBIs into a formalized handbook as the basis for the subsequent consensus rating procedure. An international multidisciplinary expert panel group (EPG) of acknowledged MDS experts (n = 17), health professionals (n = 7), and patient advocates (n = 5) was appointed. The EPG feedback rates for the first and second round were 82% (23 of 28) and 96% (26 of 27), respectively. A final set of 29 GBIs for the 3 domains of diagnosis (n = 14), therapy (n = 8), and provider/infrastructural characteristics (n = 7) achieved the predefined agreement score for selection (>70%). We identified shortcomings in standardization of patient-reported outcomes, toxicity, and geriatric assessments that need to be optimized in the future. Our GBIs represent the first comprehensive consensus on measurable elements addressing best practice performance, outcomes, and structural resources. They can be used as a standardized instrument with the goal of assessing, comparing, and fostering good quality of care within clinical development cycles in the daily care of adult MDS patients.

Purpose of Review To review available data on the relationship of MDS and aging and to address the question if biological changes of (premature) aging are a prerequisite for the development of MDS. Recent Findings Whereas the association of MDS with advanced age and some common biologic features of aging and MDS are well established, additional evidence for both, especially on the role of stem cells, the stem cell niche, and inflammation, has been recently described. Summary Biologically, many but not all drivers of aging also play a role in the development and propagation of MDS and vice versa. As a consequence, aging contributes to the development of MDS which can be seen as an interplay of clonal disease and normal and premature aging. The impact of aging may be different in specific MDS subtypes and risk groups.

Summary In the Austrian biodatabase for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (ABCMML) clinicolaboratory real-life data have been captured from 606 CMML patients from 14 different hospitals over the last 30 years. It is the only large biodatabase worldwide in which functional methods such as semisolid in vitro cultures complement modern molecular methods such as next generation sequencing. This provides the possibility to comprehensively study the biology of CMML. The aim of this study was to compare patient characteristics with published CMML cohorts and to validate established prognostic parameters in order to examine if this real-life database can serve as a representative and useful data source for further research. After exclusion of patients in transformation characteristics of 531 patients were compared with published CMML cohorts. Median values for age, leukocytes, hemoglobin, platelets, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and circulating blasts were within the ranges of reported CMML series. Established prognostic parameters including leukocytes, hemoglobin, blasts and adverse cytogenetics were able to discriminate patients with different outcome. Myeloproliferative (MP) as compared to myelodysplastic (MD)-CMML patients had higher values for circulating blasts, LDH, RAS-pathway mutations and for spontaneous myelomonocytic colony growth in vitro as well as more often splenomegaly. This study demonstrates that the patient cohort of the ABCMML shares clinicolaboratory characteristics with reported CMML cohorts from other countries and confirms phenotypic and genotypic differences between MP-CMML and MD-CMML. Therefore, results obtained from molecular and biological analyses using material from the national cohort will also be applicable to other CMML series and thus may have a more general significance.

We have originally reported that colony-forming units granulocyte/macrophage (CFU-GM) formation is an in vitro feature of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and a strong predictor for short survival. Elucidation of the molecular basis underlying this in vitro phenomenon could be helpful to define molecular features that predict inferior outcome in patients. We studied the correlation between the mutational landscape and spontaneous colony formation in 164 samples from 125 CMML patients. As compared to wildtype samples, spontaneous in vitro CFU-GM formation was significantly increased in samples containing mutations in NRAS, CBL and EZH2 that were confirmed as independent stimulatory factors by multiple regression analysis. Inducible expression of mutated RAS but not JAK2 was able to induce growth factor independence of Ba/F3 cells. Whereas high colony CFU-GM growth was a strong unfavorable parameter for survival (p &lt, 0.00001) and time to transformation (p = 0.01390), no single mutated gene had the power to significantly predict for both outcome parameters. A composite molecular parameter including NRAS/CBL/EZH2, however, was predictive for inferior survival (p = 0.00059) as well as for increased risk of transformation (p = 0.01429). In conclusion, we show that the composite molecular profile NRAS/CBL/EZH2 derived from its impact on spontaneous in vitro myeloid colony formation improves the predictive power over single molecular parameters in patients with CMML.

Background Despite the proven benefits of iron chelation therapy (ICT) in the management of chronic iron overload and related complications, compliance to long-term ICT is challenging. Results from the ECLIPSE study, an open-label, randomized, multicenter, 2-arm, phase 2 study evaluated the safety of deferasirox dispersible tablet and film-coated tablet (FCT) formulations in patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT) or very low, low, or intermediate risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) treated over 24 weeks. Methods The aim of the current study (a 2-year, open-label, multicenter, single-arm, phase 3 study) is to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of deferasirox FCT in a subset of patients with TDT or lower/intermediate-risk MDS treated for 2 years after the completion of 24 weeks of treatment with deferasirox in the ECLIPSE phase 2 study. Results Of 53 patients enrolled, 34 (64.2%) completed treatment and study. Adverse events (AEs) reported in most patients (~ 70%) were of mild to moderate severity. Headache and diarrhea were the most frequently (> 25%) reported AEs. None of the serious AEs (including 1 death) were considered treatment related. No new safety signal was identified, and long-term safety of deferasirox FCT was consistent with the known safety profile of deferasirox. No major concerns associated with gastrointestinal tolerability, renal safety, or hematological abnormalities (thrombocytopenia/neutropenia) were reported during the 2 years. Patients receiving deferasirox FCT had a treatment compliance (by pill count) of ~ 90% and persistence (continuous use for ≥ 30 days) of > 95%. Reduction in serum ferritin level was almost consistent starting from week 2 across all post-baseline time points (relative reduction: month 6, 19%; month 12, 29%). Conclusions The results from this 2-year interventional study suggest that the recommended dosing of deferasirox FCT, with better tolerability, palatability, and compliance, offers a favorable option of ICT for long-term management of iron overload and associated complications in TDT. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02720536. Registered 28 March 2016, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02720536

In the current World Health Organization (WHO)-classification, therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes (t-MDS) are categorized together with therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and t-myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms into one subgroup independent of morphologic or prognostic features. Analyzing data of 2087 t-MDS patients from different international MDS groups to evaluate classification and prognostication tools we found that applying the WHO classification for p-MDS successfully predicts time to transformation and survival (both p

The study analyzes the clonal architecture and the abnormalities involved in a series of 191 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and 2-3 clonal abnormalities. All patients were extracted from an international database. The patients were classified into six clonal subtypes (2A-3C) based on the number of abnormalities and the presentation of unrelated clones (UC) and/or a clonal evolution. UC were detected in 23/191 patients (12%). The composition of UC showed great variability. The only recurrent combination of abnormalities was del(5q) and + 8 in 8 of 23 patients (35%). In patients with clonal evolution, the clone size of the primary and secondary clone varied: Patients with -7 and + 8 in the primary clone showed a larger primary and a smaller secondary clone (-7: median 74% vs 10%; +8 73% vs 18%) while patients with del(5q) in the primary clone showed a smaller primary and a larger secondary clone (33% vs 61%). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed no significant differences regarding overall or AML-free survival between the clonal subtypes. Only the subtype 3C (3 abnormalities and clonal evolution) was an independent risk factor for developing AML (Hazard Ratio 5.5 as compared to subtype 2A, P < .05). Finally, our study confirms that the number of abnormalities clearly defines a significant risk factor for overall- as well as AML-free survival. Importantly, in patients with more than one clone, the calculation of the number of abnormalities in the entire sample instead of the number of abnormalities per clone allows a higher prognostic accuracy.

Summary In 2008 the Ludwig Boltzmann Cluster Oncology (LBC ONC) was established on the basis of two previous Ludwig Boltzmann Institutes working in the field of hematology and cancer research. The general aim of the LBC ONC is to improve treatment of hematopoietic neoplasms by eradicating cancer-initiating and disease-propagating cells, also known as leukemic stem cells (LSC) in the context of leukemia. In a first phase, the LBC ONC characterized the phenotype and molecular aberration profiles of LSC in various malignancies. The LSC phenotypes were established in acute and chronic myeloid leukemia, in acute lymphoblastic leukemia and in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. In addition, the concept of preleukemic (premalignant) neoplastic stem cells (pre-L-NSC) was coined by the LBC ONC and was tested in myelodysplastic syndromes and myeloproliferative neoplasms. Phenotypic characterization of LSC provided a solid basis for their purification and for the characterization of specific target expression profiles. In a second phase, molecular markers and targets were validated. This second phase is ongoing and should result in the development of new diagnostics parameters and novel, more effective, LSC-eradicating, treatment strategies; however, many issues still remain to be solved, such as sub-clonal evolution, LSC niche interactions, immunologic control of LSC, and LSC resistance. In the forthcoming years, the LBC ONC will concentrate on developing LSC-eradicating strategies, with special focus on LSC resistance, precision medicine and translation of LSC-eradicating concepts into clinical application.

To review data on acute myeloid leukemia (AML) presented at the 2017 meeting of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) and to discuss these data within the framework of future developments for the disease. Data generated by next generation sequencing (NGS) may be used for primary diagnosis, therapy selection and monitoring as well as characterization of persons at risk for AML development. After validation, this method will need to be implemented in general practice in the future. For treatment more targeted therapies—single agent or in combination with standard chemotherapy or low-dose treatment approaches—will become available and complement our armamentarium against AML. Among others interesting targets discussed are FLT-3, IDH1 and 2, BCL-2, MEK, E‑selectin, MDM2 and JAK1. Furthermore, maintenance after induction chemotherapy is again being considered for the management of AML.

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a myeloid neoplasm characterized by dysplasia, abnormal production and accumulation of monocytic cells and an elevated risk of transforming into acute leukemia. Over the past two decades, our knowledge about the pathogenesis and molecular mechanisms in CMML has increased substantially. In parallel, better diagnostic criteria and therapeutic strategies have been developed. However, many questions remain regarding prognostication and optimal therapy. In addition, there is a need to define potential pre-phases of CMML and special CMML variants, and to separate these entities from each other and from conditions mimicking CMML. To address these unmet needs, an international consensus group met in a Working Conference in August 2018 and discussed open questions and issues around CMML, its variants, and pre-CMML conditions. The outcomes of this meeting are summarized herein and include diag nostic criteria and a proposed classification of pre-CMML conditions as well as refined minimal diagnostic criteria for classical CMML and special CMML variants, including oligomonocytic CMML and CMML associated with systemic mastocytosis. Moreover, we propose diagnostic standards and tools to distinguish between ‘normal’, pre-CMML and CMML entities. These criteria and standards should facilitate diagnostic and prognostic evaluations in daily practice and clinical studies in applied hematology., This study was supported by Austrian Science Fund (FWF) grants F4701-B20 and F4704-B20, the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Hematology and Oncology (LBI HO) and a Stem Cell Research grant from the Medical University of Vienna.

International audience; The development of leukemia is a step-wise process that is associated with molecular diversification and clonal selection of neoplastic stem cells. Depending on the number and combinations of lesions, one or more sub-clones expand/s after a variable latency period. Initial stages may develop early in life or later in adulthood and include premalignant (indolent) stages and the malignant phase, defined by an acute leukemia. We recently proposed a cancer model in which the earliest somatic lesions are often age-related early mutations detectable in apparently healthy individuals and where additional oncogenic mutations will lead to the development of an overt neoplasm that is usually a preleukemic condition such as a myelodysplastic syndrome. These neoplasms may or may not transform to overt acute leukemia over time. Thus, depending on the type and number of somatic mutations, clonal hematopoiesis (CH) can be divided into CH with indeterminate potential (CHIP) and CH with oncogenic potential (CHOP). Whereas CHIP mutations per se usually create the molecular background of a neoplastic process, CHOP mutations are disease-related or even disease-specific lesions that trigger differentiation and/or proliferation of neoplastic cells. Over time, the acquisition of additional oncogenic events converts preleukemic neoplasms into secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML). In the present article, recent developments in the field are discussed with a focus on CHOP mutations that lead to distinct myeloid neoplasms, their role in disease evolution, and the impact of additional lesions that can drive a preleukemic neoplasm into sAML.

In myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs), the evolution of risk for disease progression or death has not been systematically investigated despite being crucial for correct interpretation of prognostic risk scores. In a multicenter retrospective study, we described changes in risk over time, the consequences for basal prognostic scores, and their potential clinical implications. Major MDS prognostic risk scoring systems and their constituent individual predictors were analyzed in 7212 primary untreated MDS patients from the International Working Group for Prognosis in MDS database. Changes in risk of mortality and of leukemic transformation over time from diagnosis were described. Hazards regarding mortality and acute myeloid leukemia transformation diminished over time from diagnosis in higher-risk MDS patients, whereas they remained stable in lower-risk patients. After approximately 3.5 years, hazards in the separate risk groups became similar and were essentially equivalent after 5 years. This fact led to loss of prognostic power of different scoring systems considered, which was more pronounced for survival. Inclusion of age resulted in increased initial prognostic power for survival and less attenuation in hazards. If needed for practicability in clinical management, the differing development of risks suggested a reasonable division into lower- and higher-risk MDS based on the IPSS-R at a cutoff of 3.5 points. Our data regarding time-dependent performance of prognostic scores reflect the disparate change of risks in MDS subpopulations. Lower-risk patients at diagnosis remain lower risk whereas initially high-risk patients demonstrate decreasing risk over time. This change of risk should be considered in clinical decision making.

The classical BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are characterized by over-production of myeloid cells, disease-related mutations in certain driver-genes (JAK2, CALR, MPL) and an increased risk to transform to secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML). Although considered stem cell-derived neoplasms, little is known about the phenotype and functional properties of disease-initiating neoplastic stem cells (NSC) in MPN and sAML. Recent data suggest that MPN NSC reside in a CD34+ fraction of the malignant clone. Therefore, these cells are considered most critical target populations to be examined for expression of molecular and immunological targets with the aim to develop improved or even curative NSC-eliminating therapies, such as antibody-based or CAR-T cell approaches. Using a panel of monoclonal antibodies (n=40) and multicolor flow cytometry, we established the immunological phenotype and target expression profiles of putative CD34+/CD38─ NSC and CD34+/CD38+ progenitor cells in patients with polycythemia vera (PV, n=18), essential thrombocythemia (ET, n=29), primary myelofibrosis (PMF, n=38) and post-MPN sAML (n=11). In almost all patients, the putative MPN stem cells expressed the stem cell invasion receptors Hermes (CD44) and ADGRE5 (CD97), C1qR1 (CD93), the migration/adhesion receptor MIC2 (CD99), and the stem cell antigen AC133 (CD133). Contrasting normal stem cells, MPN NCS and sAML stem cells failed to express Thy-1 (CD90). Among the cytokine receptors tested, MPN NSC invariably displayed the TGFßR-related antigen endoglin (CD105), TPOR (CD110), SCFR KIT (CD117), IL-3RA (CD123), CXCR4 (CD184) and IGF-1R (CD221). NSC expressed particularly high levels of KIT and low levels of TPOR and IGF-1R. The IL-2RA (CD25) was identified on NSC in most patients with PMF and sAML, and in a few with ET, but not in patients with PV. Similarly, the GM-CSFR (CD116) was found to be expressed on NSC in most patients with PMF, a few with ET and no with PV. MPN NSC did not exhibit substantial amounts of M-CSFR (CD115), IL-3RB (CD131), FLT3 (CD135), NGFR (CD271) VEGFR-2 KDR (CD309), EPOR, MET or OSMRB. The CD34+/CD38+ MPN progenitor cells displayed a similar profile of cytokine receptors. In addition, MPN and sAML progenitor cells expressed IL-1RAP and CLL-1 in most donors examined. We next examined the expression of various immunological targets and resistance-mediating immune checkpoint antigens on NSC and MPN progenitor cells. In all MPN patients and all sAML patients tested, NSC were found to express substantial amounts of Siglec-3 (CD33) and low levels of Campath-1 (CD52) and MDR-1 (CD243). In addition, MPN NSC and sAML stem cells invariably displayed the "don't eat" me checkpoint IAP (CD47) and the classical checkpoint PD-L1 (CD274). Exposure to interferon-gamma (200 U/ml, 24 hours) resulted in an upregulation of PD-L1 on NSC. In a subset of patients, MPN NSC expressed low levels of HB15 (CD83). In contrast, MPN NSC and sAML stem cells failed to express B7-1 (CD80), B7-2 (CD86), PD-L2 (CD273) and PD1 (CD279). MPN progenitor cells and sAML progenitors expressed an identical profile of cell surface targets and checkpoint antigens. Finally, we confirmed the disease-initiating capacity of MPN stem- and progenitor cells (CD34+ cells) using primary PMF cells in xenotransplantation experiments employing NSGS mice expressing human interleukin-3 (IL-3), granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and stem cell factor (SCF). After 28 weeks post injection, engraftment of human CD45+ cells in the bone marrow of NSGS mice was found in 15/15 mice injected with bulk mononuclear cells (MNC) containing CD34+ cells and in 0/15 NSGS mice injected with MNC depleted of CD34+ cells. Together, MPN NSC reside in a CD34+ fraction of the malignant clone and display a unique phenotype, including cytokine receptors, immune checkpoint molecules and other target antigens. The phenotypic characterization of neoplastic stem cells should facilitate their enrichment and the development of NSC-eradicating treatment concepts in MPN. Disclosures Valent: Allcyte GmbH: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Cellgene: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Patients with a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) sometimes show a chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML)-like phenotype but, according to the 2016 WHO classification, a documented history of an MPN excludes the diagnosis of CMML. Forty-one patients with an MPN (35 polycythemia vera (PV), 5 primary myelofibrosis, 1 essential thrombocythemia) and a CMML-like phenotype (MPN/CMML) were comprehensively characterized regarding clinical, hematologic, biologic and molecular features. The white blood cell counts in MPN/CMML patients were not different from CMML patients and PV patients. The hemoglobin values and platelet counts of these patients were higher than in CMML but lower than in PV, respectively. MPN/CMML patients showed myelomonocytic skewing, a typical in vitro feature of CMML but not of PV. The mutational landscape of MPN/CMML was not different from JAK2-mutated CMML. In two MPN/CMML patients, development of a CMML-like phenotype was associated with a decrease in the JAK2 V617F allelic burden. Finally, the prognosis of MPN/CMML (median overall survival (OS) 27 months) was more similar to CMML (JAK2-mutated, 28 months, JAK2-nonmutated 29 months) than to PV (186 months). In conclusion, we show that patients with MPN and a CMML-like phenotype share more characteristics with CMML than with PV, which may be relevant for their classification and clinical management.

7530 Background: About 40-50% of older patients (pts) with AML attain complete remission (CR) with induction chemotherapy (IC) but relapse is common.Effective, well-tolerated maintenance treatment (Tx) is needed for older pts in remission who are not eligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). CC-486 is an oral hypomethylating agent that allows for extended dosing schedules ( >7 days [d]/cycle) to sustain therapeutic activity. In the phase III placebo (PBO)-controlled QUAZAR AML-001 trial (NCT01757535), CC-486 maintenance therapy in pts with AML in first remission following IC produced significant improvements in overall and relapse-free survival. Here we report safety and tolerability findings among pt subgroups defined by age at study entry. Methods: Eligible pts were ≥ 55 yrs of age, with de novo or secondary AML, intermediate or poor risk cytogenetics, and ECOG PS ≤ 3; had achieved first CR or CRi after IC ± consolidation; and were not candidates for HSCT. Within 4 mo of CR/CRi, pts were randomized 1:1 to CC-486 300 mg or PBO QD on d 1–14 of repeated 28d Tx cycles. Safety was assessed across 3 age subgroups (≥ 55 to < 65, ≥ 65 to < 75, and ≥ 75 yrs) in pts who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug. Adverse events (AEs) were coded using MedDRA v. 22.0 and graded by NCI-CTCAE v. 4.0. Results: 469 pts ( >99% of all enrolled pts) were evaluable for safety (CC-486 n = 236; PBO n = 233). Median age was 68 yrs (range 55-86). Age distribution was similar between the two Tx arms (Table). Between Tx arms, AE rates within each age stratum were similar to rates in the overall study population. The most common AEs (any grade) with CC-486 were GI events, which were more frequent than in the PBO arm across age groups. Within the CC-486 arm, AE rates were generally consistent across age groups, except for constipation, which was > 20% more frequent in pts aged ≥ 75 yrs, and thrombocytopenia, which was ≥ 20% less frequent in this group (Table). Overall, 13% and 4% of pts in the CC-486 and PBO groups discontinued Tx due to AEs. Conclusions: In QUAZAR AML-001, CC-486 was generally well tolerated in all age groups, including elderly pts aged ≥ 75 yrs. Clinical trial information: NCT01757535 . [Table: see text]

Introduction: Despite the availability of effective iron chelators, transfusion-related morbidity is still a challenge in chronically transfused patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). In these patients, transfusion-induced iron overload may lead to organ dysfunction or even organ failure. In addition, iron overload is associated with reduced overall survival in MDS. Areas covered: During the past 10 years, various guidelines for the management of MDS patients with iron overload have been proposed. In the present article, we provide our updated recommendations for the diagnosis, prevention and therapy of iron overload in MDS. In addition, we propose refined treatment response criteria. As in 2006 and 2007, recommendations were discussed and formulated by participants of our Austrian MDS platform in a series of meetings in 2016 and 2017. Expert commentary: Our updated recommendations should support early recognition of iron overload, optimal patient management and the measurement of clinical responses to chelation treatment in daily practice.

Clinical features of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) could be influenced by many factors, such as disease intrinsic factors (e.g., morphologic, cytogenetic, molecular), extrinsic factors (e.g, management, environment), and ethnicity. Several previous studies have suggested such differences between Asian and European/USA countries. In this study, to elucidate potential differences in primary untreated MDS between Japanese (JPN) and Caucasians (CAUC), we analyzed the data from a large international database collected by the International Working Group for Prognosis of MDS (300 and 5838 patients, respectively). JPN MDS were significantly younger with more severe cytopenias, and cytogenetic differences: less del(5q) and more +1/+1q, -1/del(1p), der(1;7), -9/del(9q), del(16q), and del(20q). Although differences in time to acute myeloid leukemia transformation did not occur, a significantly better survival in JPN was demonstrated, even after the adjustment for age and FAB subtypes, especially in lower, but not in higher prognostic risk categories. Certain clinical factors (cytopenias, blast percentage, cytogenetic risk) had different impact on survival and time to transformation to leukemia between the two groups. Although possible confounding events (e.g., environment, diet, and access to care) could not be excluded, our results indicated the existence of clinically relevant ethnic differences regarding survival in MDS between JPN and CAUC patients. The good performance of the IPSS-R in both CAUC and JP patients underlines that its common risk model is adequate for CAUC and JP., Leukemia Research, 73, pp.51-57; 2018

In myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), deletion of the short arm of chromosome 12 (del(12p)) is usually a small abnormality, rarely detected as a single aberration by chromosome banding analysis (CBA) of bone marrow metaphases. Del(12p) has been described in 0.6 to 5% of MDS patients at initial diagnosis and is associated with a good to intermediate prognosis as a sole anomaly according to current scoring systems. Here, we present the results of a systematic del(12p) testing in a German prospective diagnostic study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01355913) on 367 MDS patients in whom CD34+ peripheral blood cells were analysed for the presence of del(12p) by sequential fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses. A cohort of 2,902 previously published MDS patients diagnosed by CBA served as control. We demonstrate that, using a sensitive FISH technique, 12p deletion occurs significantly more frequently in MDS than previously described (7.6% by CD34+ PB-FISH vs. 1.6% by CBA, P < 0.001) and is often associated with other aberrations (93% by CD34+ PB-FISH vs. 60% by CBA). Additionally, the detection rate can be increased by repeated analyses in a patient over time which is important for the patient´s prognosis to distinguish a sole anomaly from double or complex aberrations. To our knowledge, this is the first study to screen for 12p deletions with a suitable probe for ETV6/TEL in 12p13. Our data suggest that the supplement of a probe for the detection of a 12p deletion to common FISH probe panels helps to avoid missing a del(12p), especially as part of more complex aberrations.

Treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML), especially in older patients with comorbidities, is still a challenge and awaits further improvement regarding outcomes. Therefore data presented on this topic at the 2014 American Society of Hematology (ASH) meeting are of importance and need to be discussed in the context of current and future clinical practice. This review covers studies for AML and MDS (excluding transplantation) reported at the last ASH meeting that demonstrate progress in this field and suggest a way forward from chemotherapy to biological treatment approaches.

The patient presented here had a very poor prognosis due to previous chronic lymphocytic leukemia with unfavourable cytogenetics (deleted 17p and p53), therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (intact 17p/p53), multiple pre-treatments (fludarabine, rituximab-CHOP, rituximab-bendamustine), advanced age (71 years) and several comorbidities—circumstances that usually do not allow high-dose chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation. Due to this unfavourable condition and reportedly poorer outcome of therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia relative to de novo acute myeloid leukemia with chemotherapy, treatment with the hypomethylating agent 5-azacitidine (Vidaza®), 75 mg/m2/day, subcutaneously for 7 days of 28-day cycles was started. Therapy was well tolerated and yielded a good response not only by eradicating the therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia but also by keeping the chronic lymphocytic leukemia under control for a rather long period of time. The simultaneous suppression and re-appearance of both the therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia with intact p53 and the chronic lymphocytic leukemia with deleted p53 suggests that hypomethylation by azacitidine attains tumour control by a mechanism that (i) is similar in the different tumours and (ii) acts independently of the p53 status. This case may serve as a model for disease progression mirrored in molecular and cytogenetic findings which are factored into treatment decisions.

In Europe, azacitidine is the only hypomethylating agent approved for the treatment of patients with int-2-/high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes, offering significantly improved survival compared with conventional care. However, not all patients treated with azacitidine respond to treatment, and the vast majority of responders subsequently relapse. Currently, no standard care regimens have been established for patients after failure of azacitidine. Here, we discuss treatment options after loss of response or progression on azacitidine. In addition, we briefly consider optimization of first-line treatment along with potential biomarkers for identifying and monitoring response during treatment with azacitidine.

Summary Chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia is a rare disease and data on the treatment are often extrapolated from myelodysplastic syndrome studies. Although several scores exist for the prognosis of overall survival in chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia, so far there is no designated score for the prediction of the time to first treatment. We tested clinical parameters and cytogenetic information for their ability to predict the time to first treatment in our single center cohort of 55 unselected consecutive chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia patients. In multivariate analysis we identified elevated lactate dehydrogenase (≥223 U/l), higher bone marrow blast percentage (≥7.5%) and thrombocytopenia (

We recently published a clinically-meaningful improvement in median overall survival (OS) for patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), >30% bone marrow (BM) blasts and white blood cell (WBC) count ≤15 G/L, treated with front-line azacitidine versus conventional care regimens within a phase 3 clinical trial (AZA-AML-001; NCT01074047; registered: February 2010). As results obtained in clinical trials are facing increased pressure to be confirmed by real-world data, we aimed to test whether data obtained in the AZA-AML-001 trial accurately represent observations made in routine clinical practice by analysing additional AML patients treated with azacitidine front-line within the Austrian Azacitidine Registry (AAR; NCT01595295; registered: May 2012) and directly comparing patient-level data of both cohorts. We assessed the efficacy of front-line azacitidine in a total of 407 patients with newly-diagnosed AML. Firstly, we compared data from AML patients with WBC ≤ 15 G/L and >30% BM blasts included within the AZA-AML-001 trial treated with azacitidine (“AML-001” cohort; n = 214) with AAR patients meeting the same inclusion criteria (“AAR (001-like)” cohort; n = 95). The current analysis thus represents a new sub-analysis of the AML-001 trial, which is directly compared with a new sub-analysis of the AAR. Baseline characteristics, azacitidine application, response rates and OS were comparable between all patient cohorts within the trial or registry setting. Median OS was 9.9 versus 10.8 months (p = 0.616) for “AML-001” versus “AAR (001-like)” cohorts, respectively. Secondly, we pooled data from both cohorts (n = 309) and assessed the outcome. Median OS of the pooled cohorts was 10.3 (95% confidence interval: 8.7, 12.6) months, and the one-year survival rate was 45.8%. Thirdly, we compared data from AAR patients meeting AZA-AML-001 trial inclusion criteria (n = 95) versus all AAR patients with World Health Organization (WHO)-defined AML (“AAR (WHO-AML)” cohort; n = 193). Within the registry population, median OS for AAR patients meeting trial inclusion criteria versus all WHO-AML patients was 10.8 versus 11.8 months (p = 0.599), respectively. We thus tested and confirmed the efficacy of azacitidine as a front-line agent in patients with AML, >30% BM blasts and WBC ≤ 15 G/L in a routine clinical practice setting. We further show that the efficacy of azacitidine does not appear to be limited to AML patients who meet stringent clinical trial inclusion criteria, but instead appears efficacious as front-line treatment in all patients with WHO-AML., publishedVersion

International Prognostic Scoring Systems are used to determine the individual risk profile of myelodysplastic syndrome patients. For the assessment of International Prognostic Scoring Systems, an adequate chromosome banding analysis of the bone marrow is essential. Cytogenetic information is not available for a substantial number of patients (5%-20%) with dry marrow or an insufficient number of metaphase cells. For these patients, a valid risk classification is impossible. In the study presented here, the International Prognostic Scoring Systems were validated based on fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses using extended probe panels applied to cluster of differentiation 34 positive (CD34(+)) peripheral blood cells of 328 MDS patients of our prospective multicenter German diagnostic study and compared to chromosome banding results of 2902 previously published patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. For cytogenetic risk classification by fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses of CD34(+) peripheral blood cells, the groups differed significantly for overall and leukemia-free survival by uni- and multivariate analyses without discrepancies between treated and untreated patients. Including cytogenetic data of fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses of peripheral CD34(+) blood cells (instead of bone marrow banding analysis) into the complete International Prognostic Scoring System assessment, the prognostic risk groups separated significantly for overall and leukemia-free survival. Our data show that a reliable stratification to the risk groups of the International Prognostic Scoring Systems is possible from peripheral blood in patients with missing chromosome banding analysis by using a comprehensive probe panel (clinicaltrials.gov identifier:01355913). peerReviewed

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are typical diseases of the elderly. The clinical outcome of a well-characterized cohort of patients with MDS was analyzed for prevalence and impact of comorbidities to establish the basis for tailored treatment algorithms. Focus was on age- and sex-related differences.The hematopoietic cell transplantation-comorbidity index (HCT-CI) was assessed in 616 well-defined patients from the Austrian MDS platform (median age: 71years).Most patients displayed one (24.5%) or more (23.7%) comorbidities. The highest frequencies were observed for cardiovascular disease (28.4%), diabetes (12.2%), and prior tumors (9.9%). Comorbidities were more frequent (mean number: 0.92 vs. 0.74 [male vs. female]; p=0.030) and more severe in men than in women (mean HCT-CI score: 1.41 vs. 1.09 [male vs. female]; p=0.016). Elderly patients (65+years) showed a higher prevalence of comorbidities than younger patients (HCT-CI score: 1.52, mean in 65+, vs. 0.24 and 0.76 in45years and 46-65years, respectively) (p0.001). These differences were most pronounced for cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and prior tumors (p0.001). Presence of cardiac arrhythmia or prior solid tumor was significantly associated with shorter overall survival (p=0.023, 0.024, respectively). Moreover, HCT-CI risk grouping remained an independent prognostic parameter for survival in multivariate analysis.Comorbidities impact clinical outcome in elderly patients with MDS. Distinct diseases cluster in an age- and sex-related manner, which may have clinical implications when designing individualized therapies. Comorbidities should be evaluated with established scores and integrated in decision making.

Data on efficacy and safety of azacitidine in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with >30 % bone marrow (BM) blasts are limited, and the drug can only be used off-label in these patients. We previously reported on the efficacy and safety of azacitidine in 155 AML patients treated within the Austrian Azacitidine Registry (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01595295). We herein update this report with a population almost twice as large (n = 302). This cohort included 172 patients with >30 % BM blasts; 93 % would have been excluded from the pivotal AZA-001 trial (which led to European Medicines Agency (EMA) approval of azacitidine for high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and AML with 20–30 % BM blasts). Despite this much more unfavorable profile, results are encouraging: overall response rate was 48 % in the total cohort and 72 % in patients evaluable according to MDS-IWG-2006 response criteria, respectively. Median OS was 9.6 (95 % CI 8.53–10.7) months. A clinically relevant OS benefit was observed with any form of disease stabilization (marrow stable disease (8.1 months), hematologic improvement (HI) (9.7 months), or the combination thereof (18.9 months)), as compared to patients without response and/or without disease stabilization (3.2 months). Age, white blood cell count, and BM blast count at start of therapy did not influence OS. The baseline factors LDH >225 U/l, ECOG ≥2, comorbidities ≥3, monosomal karyotype, and prior disease-modifying drugs, as well as the response-related factors hematologic improvement and further deepening of response after first response, were significant independent predictors of OS in multivariate analysis. Azacitidine seems effective in WHO-AML, including patients with >30 % BM blasts (currently off-label use). Although currently not regarded as standard form of response assessment in AML, disease stabilization and/or HI should be considered sufficient response to continue treatment with azacitidine. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00277-014-2126-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Background In myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML), achievement of morphologic complete response (CR) is a prerequisite for potential cure. In AML, CR is deemed the major outcome associated with improved overall survival (OS); patients (pts) without CR are considered non-responders, and hematologic improvement (HI) without bone marrow blast (BMB) clearance is considered treatment (trt) failure (Cheson 2003). Evidence suggests that these definitions may not be applicable to older pts treated with hypomethylating agents (HMA), and that achievement of CR may not be necessary for prolonged OS (Pleyer 2013, 2014, 2015; Schuh 2015; Bloomfield 2018). IWG response criteria for HI do not differentiate between pts who qualify for response (QFR) vs those that do not. Pts with 'normal' blood counts at trt start are per definition HI non-responders. This may obscure potential survival benefits of responding pts. Aims 1) Assess the impact of HI irrespective of BMB clearance and excluding immortal time bias via landmark analyses. 2) Differentiate between pts who QFR, and those with 'normal' baseline values (not-QFR) defined according to IWG prerequisites for CR. 3) Introduce 3 new categories of HI: peripheral blood blasts (PBB), elevated white blood cells (WBC), and PB-CR (defined as Hb ≥11 g/dl, ANC ≥1.0 G/l, WBC Methods 1301 consecutive pts with azacitidine (AZA) trt were analyzed (NCT01595295). Data cut-off 26.07.19. HI was assessed according to IWG criteria (Cheson 2006) and the definitions specified in 3) above. More recent proposals of revision for low-risk MDS pts included in trials (Platzbecker 2018) remain largely idem. Human errors in HI assessment for each AZA cycle and lineage were excluded by automated computational calculation from electronic case report form (eCRF) data. Landmark analyses were performed at 3 months (mo) (HI requires ≥8 weeks response duration) and 6 mo (91, 92 and 88% of MDS, CMML and AML pts respond by cycle 6 [Silverman 2011; Pleyer 2013, 2014]). Statistics were performed by Unidata Geodesign GmbH using DeployR Open 8.0.0. Results In total, 462, 113, and 720 pts had MDS, CMML and AML (n=6 unknown). At AZA start, median age was 73 (range 23-93) years. One, 2 or 3 cytopenias were present in 25, 41 and 29% of pts and 46% were transfusion dependent. 55% received AZA 1st line (26% of whom received prior growth factors or iron chelators). Median AZA dose was 889 mg/cycle and 73 mg/m2/day. Median time to 1st response was 3.0 mo and 95% of pts responded by cycle 6. During AZA trt 1091 BM evaluations (BME) were performed in 599 (46%) pts. At the 3 (6) mo landmark, 44% (47%) of pts with BME achieved CR or CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi). Early mortality was 5.6 and 10.3% at 30 and 60 days. Of 932 (598) pts that met the 3 (6) mo landmark, a total of 39% (25%) had no BME. The impact of HI on OS became smaller the later the landmark (Tables 1 and 2). The impact of response on OS was 0.4-4.4 mo longer and significance at the 6 mo landmark was retained using IWG criteria with (Table 1) vs without (Table 2) differentiating between pts who did or did not QFR. Pts who did not QFR had similar or better OS compared with responders. At the 3 mo landmark, proposed additional response parameters HI-PBB, HI-elevated WBC and PB-CR were assoc. with a survival benefit of +7.4, +5.0 and +12.9 mo (Table 1, Fig 1A-C). Conclusions 1) The impact of HI on OS is overestimated without landmark analyses. Median time to 1st response was 3.0 mo and ≥8 weeks response duration required. We therefore suggest using a 3 mo landmark when assessing HI. 2) Using IWG criteria for HI assessment underestimates the impact of response, as non-responders are diluted by pts who do not QFR. Distinguishing QFR/not-QFR seems necessary. 3) Proposed additional HI categories (HI-PBB, HI-elevated WBC, PB-CR) add value to current response criteria. It is often the case that BME are not performed in elderly pts in real-world settings (Dinmohamed 2015; current study). Achievement of HI in any lineage and especially PB-CR might be used as a surrogate for response in pts unable or unwilling to undergo BME for response assessment. This large and growing database is suitable to allow future validation of potential novel response criteria. Disclosures Pleyer: Celgene: Other: Advisory board; Novartis: Other: Advisory board; Inflection Point Biomedical Advisors: Other: Advisory board; Agios: Other: Advisory board; Abbvie: Other: Advisory board. Pfeilstocker:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Stauder:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva (Ratiopharm): Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory board, Research Funding. Heibl:Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sill:Astex: Other: Advisory board; Novartis: Other: Advisory board; AbbVie: Other: Advisory board; Astellas: Other: Advisory board. Girschikofsky:Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria. Petzer:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Other: Personal fees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vallet:MSD: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Roche Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Geissler:Abbvie: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; AOP: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Ratiopharm: Honoraria. Sperr:Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Leisch:Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Celgene: Other: Travel support; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Honoraria. Egle:Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Advisory board and Travel support. Melchardt:MSD: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Cephalon: Research Funding. Piringer:Amgen: Research Funding; Roche: Other: Travel support; Merck: Other: Travel support; Bayer: Research Funding. Zebisch:Roche: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; Celgene: Honoraria; AbbVie: Other: Advisory board. Machherndl-Spandl:Celgene: Other: Advisory board. Wolf:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria. Keil:Bionorica: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding. Greil:Ratiopharm: Research Funding; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/accomodation expenses, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/accomodation expenses, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Cephalon: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/accomodation expenses, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/accomodation expenses, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/accomodation expenses, Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Eisai: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi Aventis: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/accomodation expenses, Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Sandoz: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/accomodation expenses, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/accomodation expenses, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: Azacitidine is not approved for the treatment of MP-CMML, CMML with

Introduction: The incidence and prevalence of patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) are continuously rising due to population ageing and diagnostic advances. Consequently, the appropriate use of health care resources and assessment of their impact on relevant outcomes are of growing interest. Several evidence-based guidelines and recommendations (G&Rs) have been published for adult MDS patients. However, publishing G&Rs does not necessarily translate into better quality of care. Several studies have shown that MDS patients are not always treated according to published G&Rs, but systematic investigations have not been done so far. To this aim, we initiated the I-CARE for MDS study with the objectives to i) define relevant guideline-based indicators (GBIs) as measurable elements of practice performance for appropriate care, ii) assess the level of adherence and reasons for non-adherence to GBIs and iii) investigate the impact of adherence/non-adherence to GBIs on MDS relevant outcomes. Here we present results of the development of GBIs for appropriate care in adult MDS patients. Methods: We systematically screened G&Rs from cooperative MDS groups as well as cancer care accreditation/certification programs (table 1). All relevant information was extracted by a structured procedure and summarized as candidate GBIs in a handbook (table 2). We applied a RAND technique with a two-step DELPHI rating procedure to find an expert consensus for the clinically most relevant GBIs (Coulter J et al, J Health Serv Res Policy, 2018). The expert panel group (EPGs) members consisted of 17 internationally acknowledged MDS experts, 7 additional health-professionals (3 nurses, 1 pharmacologist, 1 physiotherapist, 1 psychologist and 1 epidemiologist) and 3 patient advocates. Candidate GBIs were rated using a 9-point Likert-like scale for Relevance, Understandability, Measurability, Behaviorability, Attainability (RUMBA-criteria) and ranked according to the agreement score, defined as % of all EPG members scoring all RUMBA-criteria in the first tertile (9, 8, or 7). Results: We extracted 61 candidate GBIs from G&Rs for the three domains Diagnostics (n=23), Treatment (n=21) and Provider characteristics (n=17). 18 and 16 candidate GBIs were excluded after the first and second round, respectively, remaining with a set of 27 GBIs (figures 1-3). Twelve GBIs were selected for Diagnostics (figure 1). Patient reported outcomes (PROs), Toxicity assessment (TAs) and Geriatric assessment were excluded as there was no agreement among experts on appropriate measurement instruments and concerns for practicability in daily routine. Eight GBIs were selected for Treatment (figure 2). Iron-chelation and Immunosuppressive treatment, even though mentioned in most G&Rs, were excluded, as there were concerns with regard to controversial indications, side effects and benefit for only a minority of patients. Seven GBIs were selected for Provider characteristics (figure 3), which will be generally fulfilled by accreditation or certification of institutions. Agreement scores were generally higher in this domain and required a more stringent threshold for selection of GBIs. Conclusions: Here we report on the development of relevant GBIs for the management of adult MDS patients covering the domains of Diagnostics, Treatment and Provider characteristics. Our preliminary set GBIs represents the most comprehensive integration of current practice based G&Rs and were developed by a structured consensus process involving internationally acknowledged experts. We identified important shortcomings in standardisation, measurability and practicability, especially for PROs and TAs, which asks for improvements in the future. Even though PROs and TAs are generally acknowledged endpoints for efficacy and safety, respectively, they are yet not standardised outside clinical trials or validated to inform routine MDS care. Our preliminary set of GBIs will be tested for applicability/operability as well as validated for their potential impact on relevant outcomes in MDS cohorts. They will eventually enable to systematically monitor, compare and optimize appropriateness of health care provided to MDS patients in everyday clinical practice. As such, GBIs will be important for the realization of a common standard for value-based medicine in economically driven health care systems with limiting resources. Disclosures Fenaux: Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Aprea: Research Funding; Astex: Honoraria, Research Funding. Germing:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Pfeilstocker:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Platzbecker:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Medina De Almeida:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Mittelman:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Steensma:H3 Biosciences: Other: Research funding to institution, not investigator.; Stemline: Consultancy; Arrowhead: Equity Ownership; Aprea: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Onconova: Consultancy; Astex: Consultancy; Summer Road: Consultancy. Santini:Menarini: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acceleron: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Stauder:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva (Ratiopharm): Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory board, Research Funding. Symeonidis:MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Tekeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. de Witte:Novartis: Research Funding; celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Bonadies:Novartis: Other: financial support for travel, Research Funding; Celgene: Other: financial support for travel, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: financial support for travel; Roche: ; Amgen: Other: financial support for travel.

Central nervous system recurrence in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) occurs in up to 15% of patients and is frequently associated with poor outcome. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a slow-release liposomal formulation of cytarabine for intrathecal (IT) meningeal prophylaxis in patients suffering from ALL. Forty patients aged 20–77 years (median 36) were preventively treated with a total of 96 (range 1–6) single doses containing 50 mg of liposomal cytarabine on a compassionate use basis. After a median observation period of 23 months (range 2–118) only two patients experienced a combined medullary–leptomeningeal disease recurrence after primary diagnosis. Except for headache grade 2 in two patients, no specific toxicity attributable to IT liposomal cytarabine application was noted. Long-term neurological side effects were not observed. IT liposomal cytarabine therapy with concomitant dexamethasone appears to be feasible and well tolerated.

To the editor: The recent article by Arber et al[1][1] detailing the 2016 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid malignancies and AML was timely and germane. Regarding myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), the authors indicate diagnostic criteria that include levels of

Non

The recent landscape of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) diagnosis and treatment is changing due to research resulting in a deeper insight into the pathobiology of the disease consequently being translated into new treatment approaches. Recent developments in MDS research published in the last year as well as data presented at ASH 2011 are covered in this review.

Background Recent improvements in the treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes have fostered further interest in the development of prognostic scores. Prognostic indices such as the IPSS were developed and later validated assuming their predictive values to be unchanged over time. A systematic analysis of the possible variability of predictive power over time in different scores is still lacking and was the aim of this study. Design and methods For 243 primary MDS patients from a single institution treated with supportive care, 19 established or modified scoring systems based on different prognostic factors (clinical, cytogenetical and/or comorbidity) were analysed for their variability over time by statistical methods that quantify time variations in the risk relations (specifically the risk ratios of Cox models) between prognostic subgroups. Results Established scores based mainly on clinical parameters showed strong to moderate loss of predictive power over time whereas cytogenetic scores maintained their predictive power. Scores including comorbidity data showed gain of predictive power over time. Conclusions The development and comparison of prognostic systems have to take into account their stability versus the possibility or need for re-evaluation. Possibly not only re-evaluation after time is of importance, but also different weighting of items constituting scores.

Seit vielen Jahren wird die Biologie der Tumorzellen und ihre Bedeutung fur Tumorprogression, Metastasierung und Prognose der Tumorpatienten erforscht. In den letzten Jahren gewinnt dabei das Konzept der sogenannten Tumor-Stammzellen immer mehr an Bedeutung. Dieses Modell basiert auf der Beobachtung, dass das kontinuierliche Wachstum von Tumoren und Leukamien von einer kleinen Population sehr unreifer neoplastischer Zellen, den Tumorstammzellen abhangt, wahrend die reiferen Zellen der Neoplasie nach einer variablen Anzahl von Zellteilungen uber Apoptose absterben. Die Selbsterneuerungsfahigkeit der Tumorstammzellen spielt dabei eine zentrale Rolle und ermoglicht eine dauerhafte Repopulation in vivo im Patienten und in experimentellen Modellen wie z.B. in immunsupprimierten Mausen. Somit ist auch klar, dass antineoplastische Therapien nur dann ein kuratives Potential haben, wenn die Tumorstammzellen getroffen werden. Ein wichtiger Aspekt ist deren intrinsische Resistenz gegenuber konventionellen Medikamenten. Daher versucht man, molekulare Targets und Target-Expressionsprofile in neoplastischen Stammzellen zu erkennen und in therapeutischen Ansatzen zu nutzen. Es ist zu erhoffen, dass die Anwendung der Tumorstammzell-Konzepte zu einer nachhaltigen Verbesserung der Therapie von Leukamien und Tumorerkrankungen fuhren wird.