Search

OBJECTIVES The prevalence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is increasing and psychostimulants are the pharmacological standard of care. Patients benefit most when there is efficient titration to a stable dose of medication as defined by maintaining that same dose for 6 months. The aims of this study were to describe time to stable dose in a cohort of children with ADHD and examine the impact of demographic factors. METHODS A list of pediatric patients with a diagnosis of ADHD in the electronic health record was generated, and a retrospective chart review of stimulant use was conducted on 500 patients randomly selected from 2010 to 2015 who met inclusion criteria. Time to stable dosing and its association with demographic characteristics were assessed. RESULTS Patients were predominantly male (72%), white (81%), and privately insured (67%). Fifty-five percent of patients achieved a stable dose of medication on first attempt; therefore, the median time to stable dosing for the cohort was 0 days with the interquartile range being 0 to 133.8 days. There was significant increase in time to stable dose for patients younger than 10 years compared with those ≥10 years of age (p = 0.01). Time to stable dose was not significantly associated with race (p = 0.13), sex (p = 0.72), type of insurance (p = 0.56), or formulation being immediate or extended release (p = 0.56). CONCLUSIONS Many patients had long titration periods when trying to reach a stable dose. Given that medication switching can be challenging for patients and families, more frequent contact with providers during titration may be necessary.

This study examined elementary and middle school teachers’ self-reported use of behavioral supports for students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) from a national sample of teachers. This information is important given increased attention and emphasis on universal and targeted strategies within problem-solving models in schools. Participants were teachers surveyed from 26 states across North America about their use of behavioral supports for their students with ADHD. Results are grouped by primary (K–2), intermediate (3–5), and middle (6–8) school levels. Results from this survey demonstrate that teachers report using significantly more universal and targeted strategies in the primary and intermediate school levels than teachers in the middle school level, revealing a reduction of behavioral supports for students with ADHD as they move into the middle school years. These findings have have implications for targeting school-based interventions for students with ADHD as they transition into middle school.

Abnormal eye gaze is a hallmark characteristic of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and numerous studies have identified abnormal attention patterns in ASD. The primary aim of the present study was to create an objective, eye tracking-based autism risk index.In initial and replication studies, children were recruited after referral for comprehensive multidisciplinary evaluation of ASD and subsequently grouped by clinical consensus diagnosis (ASD n = 25/15, non-ASD n = 20/19 for initial/replication samples). Remote eye tracking was blinded to diagnosis and included multiple stimuli. Dwell times were recorded to each a priori-defined region of interest (ROI) and averaged across ROIs to create an autism risk index. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses examined classification accuracy. Correlations with clinical measures evaluated whether the autism risk index was associated with autism symptom severity independent of language ability.In both samples, the autism risk index had high diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.91 and 0.85, 95% CIs = 0.81-0.98 and 0.71-0.96), was strongly associated with Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-Second Edition (ADOS-2) severity scores (r = 0.58 and 0.59, p .001), and not significantly correlated with language ability (r ≤| -0.28|, p.095).The autism risk index may be a useful quantitative and objective measure of risk for autism in at-risk settings. Future research in larger samples is needed to cross-validate these findings. If validated and scaled for clinical use, this measure could inform clinical judgment regarding ASD diagnosis and track symptom improvements.

In today's changing medical climate, physicians need to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) better and more cost-effectively. The authors review recommendations supported by recent research and offer simple practices that integrate medicine and behavioral health for patients with ADHD.

Optimal management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) requires a comprehensive treatment approach that reduces symptoms and improves quality of life. Psychosocial therapy, an important adjunct to pharmacotherapy for patients with ADHD, enables patients to improve functional performance across domains of life and maximizes the benefits of symptom reduction achieved via medication. This article evaluates the main types of psychosocial therapies used in the treatment of adult ADHD and discusses treatment goals within the context of skill acquisition and strength optimization. Factors influencing the success of psychosocial therapy and the role of a comprehensive treatment approach are also examined. The sequenced presentation of symptom reduction and skill acquisition plays a key role in coordinating psychosocial therapy and pharmacotherapy in a multimodal strategy for the effective treatment of adult ADHD.

Background Estimates of ADHD diagnosis and stimulant medication use vary across studies. Few studies ascertain the teacher perspective on these rates.

Objective: This study compared the relative effects of three treatment conditions: long-acting stimulant medication (MED), behavior modification, and medication/behavioral treatments combined (COM) in children with ADHD. Method: A total of 25 children, aged 6 to 12 years, received the three treatment conditions during a 7-week Summer Treatment Program in an alternating treatments design. Counselors completed behavioral ratings from 0.5 to 12.5 hr post dose, and parents completed nighttime ratings. Results: Ratings for SKAMP (Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham) and for following instructions indicated COM and MED improved symptoms over BEH treatment beginning 3 hr post dose ( p = .008), with ratings maintained 12.5 hr post dose ( p = .001 and .006). Results for frustration tolerance indicated significant improvement in all three conditions until 9 hr post dose. Conclusion: MED and COM separated from BEH at 3 hr post dose, and sustained benefit was observed across the day for two of three measures. BEH appears to have an additive effect, extending the duration of frustration tolerance.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the time course and predictors of improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQL) and medication satisfaction in children diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and treated with the methylphenidate transdermal system (MTS).Temporal relationships between ADHD symptoms, medication satisfaction, and HRQL measures were examined via latent growth curve, structural path, and growth mixture models.Higher levels of medication satisfaction at the end of titration predicted greater increases in family HRQL (p=0.004) and, to a lesser extent, child HRQL (p=0.068) throughout the study. At 4 of 6 (p0.05) and 5 of 6 (p0.10) contemporaneous time points, ADHD symptoms predicted child HRQL. At 2 of 6 (p0.05) and 3 of 6 (p0.10) contemporaneous time points, ADHD symptoms predicted family HRQL. ADHD did not predict child or family HRQL improvements at subsequent time points. A uniform pattern of change for child HRQL was noted, with most HRQL change following the pattern of symptom change during titration. Three distinct patterns of change were noted for family HRQL.In most cases, medication satisfaction, ADHD symptoms, and HRQL improved simultaneously, suggesting that HRQL was not a delayed response to improvement in symptoms. Children showed a uniform pattern of improvement in HRQL that followed symptom change; three distinct patterns of change were found for improvement in family HRQL.

Introduction:Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is a prodrug stimulant approved for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults and children 6–12 years of age. Parent surveys provide valuable information regarding the impact of ADHD treatments.Methods:Parents of children with ADHD beginning treatment with LDX voluntarily completed surveys through an automated telephone system or the Internet before and 6 weeks after LDX treatment initiation. Prescribing physicians received individual reports of the responses for each survey completed by their patients' parents. All patients whose parents completed both baseline and 6 week surveys were included in the analyses. Subgroup analyses were conducted for those previously treated with medications to treat ADHD, including mixed amphetamine salts-extended release.Results:LDX treatment was associated with a significant decrease in ADHD symptom interference with school activities, family interactions, homework, and social interactions (PPConclusion:Patients treated with LDX showed significant symptom improvement and parents reported significantly greater satisfaction than with prior treatment.

Objective: Developmental and subtype differences in behavioral assets and problems were examined in 318 children newly diagnosed with ADHD. Method: Three age groups were compared: 4 to 6.9 years ( n = 95), 7 to 9.9 years ( n = 136), and 10 to 15 years ( n = 87); with two subtypes examined: inattentive ( n = 151), and hyperactive/combined ( n = 167). Data on assets and problems were obtained from parental questionnaires. Analyses were conducted for the assets and problems data with subtype and age as between group factors. Results: Younger children had more problems with hyperactivity, and the eldest group had more externalizing problems. The hyperactive/combined subtype exhibited more problems than the inattentive subtype. Also the younger group had more assets than the eldest group. Conclusion: Children who possessed greater assets had fewer behavioral problems, with assessment of assets and problems important in the diagnosis of ADHD. ( J. of Att. Dis. 2007; 11(1) 28-36)

Objective This was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, dose-ranging study of a methylphenidate (MPH) transdermal system (MTS). Medication (placebo, 0.45, 0.9, and 1.8 mg/h) was crossed with application time (6 a.m., 7 a.m.) to evaluate MTS efficacy and influence of exposure time on morning effects. Method The study took place in a summer treatment program (STP) at three sites, with 36 children aged 7-12 years with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Each treatment was administered for 1 day in random order, for a total of 8 days. Behavioral and academic measures were taken as well as patch wear characteristics and side effects. Results Evaluable participant data were analyzed in a series of dose × application time multivariate analyses of variance. All MTS conditions were significantly different from placebo across measures. Time of application had no significant effect on daily behavior, and effects of application time on morning behavior were inconclusive. Consistent with previous results in this setting, the highest dose produced limited incremental benefit compared with the mid-range dose. The wear characteristics of the MTS were acceptable, and the formulation was well tolerated. Conclusions The MTS produced significant effects that were similar to those previously reported with comparable MPH doses. There does not appear to be a substantial effect of application time on total daily functioning in this setting; further controlled time-course studies will be necessary to evaluate the question of morning onset fully.

Behavior modification is an evidence-based treatment for children with attentiondeficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Time-out from positive reinforcement is one behavior-modification procedure commonly recommended to manage disruptive or noncompliant behavior. This investigation examined the effects of time-out on children's behavior within the context of an intensive summer treatment program at two sites. Short (5-minute), long (15-minute), and escalating/de-escalating time-out conditions were compared to no time-out for 71 children. Results indicated that the time-out conditions were superior to no time-out in reducing the occurrence of intentional aggression, intentional destruction of property, and repeated noncompliance in the recreational and classroom settings regardless of child age or parent reported oppositional or conduct problems. There were no effects of time-out on staff member ratings of time-out effectiveness or the pleasantness of staff-child interactions. All three time-out conditions were equally effective in the group analyses, though analyses of normalization of functioning indicated there were individual differences in response to the time-out conditions. The results indicated that time-out is an effective means of reducing negative behavior in children with ADHD.

Objective To compare the effectiveness of a single dose of Adderall® (q.d.) with that of 2 daily doses of methylphenidate (b.i.d.; MPH) as a treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in youths ranging in age from 5 to 17 years. Forty-two youths treated with MPH were compared with 42 youths treated with Adderall®. Subjects were matched for age, sex, and DSM-IV diagnostic subtype. Method Youths were assigned to the Adderall® or MPH condition by their prescribing physician. All youths were evaluated under 5 conditions, including baseline, placebo, 5 mg, 10 mg, and 15 mg. The best dose was assigned prior to breaking the medication blind and was assigned by the consensus of the psychologist and psychiatrist. Subjective ratings by both teachers and parents were examined for dosage level effects and medication type effects. Results Best dose was always superior to baseline and placebo conditions. No differences between MPH and Adderall® were observed on either teacher or parent ratings of behavior. Conclusions Both MPH and Adderall® have been shown to be effective treatments for children with ADHD. Both medications appear to improve teachers' and parents' ratings of behavior. Single-dose treatments of Adderall® appear to be as effective as 2 daily doses of MPH and therefore increase the possibility of managing treatment without involving the school in medication administration. In addition, youths who have previously been unsuccessfully treated with MPH because of adverse side effects or poor response may be successfully treated with Adderall®.

ADHD is one of the most common neurobehavioral disorders of childhood, and FDA-approved medications offer an efficacious treatment option. However, case reports and anecdotal sources suggest that children can have emotional responses, both salutary and detrimental, to these agents. We have previously conducted a comprehensive literature review and found very few research studies systematically examining changes in emotional expression (EE) associated with ADHD medication use. In addition, no empirical data pertaining to the management of these responses could be found. Although few methodologically stringent data are available for changes in EE, such changes should be recognized and measured to determine appropriate responses by clinicians and to maximize treatment benefits and reduce side effects. In this companion report, we draw on available research evidence and clinical experience to explore typical clinical manifestations, differential diagnosis, scales for monitoring, and management approaches of EE observed with pharmacologic treatment of ADHD. In the future, controlled clinical trials of ADHD pharmacotherapy should employ standardized ratings of EE at baseline, during and after treatment. In addition, future research studies should examine various management approaches of these EE changes, to ensure maximal treatment benefits and minimal risks to patients with ADHD who are treated with medication. (J. of Att. Dis. 2011; 15(2) 113-121)

The National Comorbidity Survey Replication by Kessler and colleagues found that of adult patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), 9.4% met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition-Revised criteria for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Among those with dysthymia, 22.6% also met criteria for ADHD. In addition, it is estimated that approximately a third of the United States population experiences MDD symptoms at any point in time. Kessler and colleagues also conducted a retrospective study on impairment of adults with ADHD and found that ADHD has a prevalence of ∼4.4% in the US adult population, which suggests that ∼9 million US adults may have ADHD.

To evaluate the impact of methylphenidate transdermal system (MTS) on health-related quality of life (HRQL) and medication satisfaction in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) as well as to identify potential moderators of HRQL and medication satisfaction.Children aged 6-12 years diagnosed with ADHD were enrolled (N = 128) and 115 children completed the study. MTS dose was optimized over 5 weeks using 10-, 15-, 20-, or 30-mg patches worn for 9 hours. The efficacy of 4- and 6-hour wear times was then assessed in an analog classroom setting in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, three-way crossover design study.The ADHD Impact Module-Children (AIM-C), a validated HRQL instrument, was used to assess the impact of ADHD symptoms on children and their families. Satisfaction with MTS use was assessed via a Medication Satisfaction Survey (MSS). A parent or legally appointed representative (LAR) completed the measures. Tolerability was monitored by spontaneous adverse event reporting.Mean scores on AIM-C child and family HRQL scales improved from baseline to endpoint across all MTS doses and the magnitude of improvement increased with time from baseline. Improvement was noted for behavior, missed doses, worry, and economic impact AIM-C scores. Overall, parents/LARs indicated a high level of satisfaction with their child's use of MTS (Visit 7 [92.1%]; Visit 10 [89.1%]). Most treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were mild to moderate. The most frequent TEAEs included decreased appetite (28%), headache (21%), insomnia (20%), and abdominal pain (12%).At study endpoint, MTS treatment of ADHD was associated with robust improvement in child and family HRQL, key economic impact items, and overall medication satisfaction with the effectiveness and ease of use of MTS as an ADHD treatment. Also, the majority of MTS TEAEs were mild to moderate in severity. Limitations of this study included the potential for a significant halo effect when measuring HRQL and medication satisfaction as well as the uncertainty regarding whether the improvements seen over this relatively short study duration would be sustainable long term.#NCT00151970.

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) impairs the lives of both children and adults. Undiagnosed and untreated, ADHD may have serious lifelong consequences. Research has identified diagnostic clues, neurotransmitter pathways, and psychiatric comorbidities related to ADHD, as well as effective pharmacologic, behavioral, and psychosocial interventions. Stimulant agents have been the foundation of ADHD therapy for more than 50 years. Availability of new extended-release (XR or ER) and longer-acting (LA) formulations and novel agents allows for wider and more individualized treatment choices. Side effects of stimulants are generally mild, short lived, and responsive to adjustments in dosage or timing. Outcomes in ADHD treatment can be improved with the use of clear treatment guidelines and tools to aid clinicians in implementing them efficiently and effectively. The Texas Children's Medication Algorithm Project (CMAP) provides a system of algorithm-driven treatment decisions that is evidence based and easy to implement.To (1) review the psychological components of attention, the neurotransmitter pathways associated with ADHD, and the array of therapeutic options for ADHD, with an emphasis on the most recent introductions to the therapeutic armamentarium; (2) discuss the rare psychiatric and cardiovascular side effects associated with stimulants; (3) review abuse liability, comorbidities, and suggested approaches to these issues; and (4) review the development and use of CMAP and offer resources for its implementation in clinical practice.The pathophysiology of ADHD is linked to dysfunction of fronto-subcortical networks and dysregulation of dopaminergic, noradrenergic, and nicotinic neurotransmitter systems. An additive effect of multiple genes as well as environmental influences contributes to the clinical picture. Treatment with stimulants and nonstimulants has proven effective in different subgroups, with the effectiveness of specific agents most likely related to the primary neurotransmitter involved. Availability of XR, ER, LA, and transdermal stimulant formulations, as well as alternative nonstimulant agents, offers new options for the pharmacotherapy of ADHD. Major concerns associated with abuse liability of stimulants have been allayed by the availability of ER formulations, which have reduced reinforcing effects associated with short-acting preparations. Medication outcomes in ADHD can be enhanced by the use of evidence-based algorithms such as CMAP. Keys to success are adequate initial assessment and diagnosis, the use of sustained-release products, sufficient dose titration, and the use of clinical rating scales with feedback from caregivers and teachers. Optimal treatment outcomes can be achieved by appropriate pharmacotherapy combined with psychosocial interventions.

Objective To examine the short-term efficacy of methylphenidate in the treatment of youths with bipolar disorder (BD) and comorbid attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Method A 4-week double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in youths ages 5 to 17 years was conducted. Subjects met DSM-IV criteria for bipolar disorder and ADHD, were currently receiving a stable dose of at least one thymoleptic, and while euthymic continued to have clinically significant symptoms of ADHD. Patients received 1 week each of placebo, methylphenidate 5 mg twice daily, methylphenidate 10 mg twice daily, and methylphenidate 15 mg twice daily using a crossover design. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive one of six possible dosing orders. At study's end, and before the blind being broken, a "best dose week" for each subject was determined. The primary outcome measure was the total score on the parent-completed ADHD Rating Scale-IV. Results Sixteen patients, with a mean age of 10.43 (SD 3.14) years completed the trial. Lower scores during best dose treatment compared to the week of placebo treatment were found on the ADHD Rating Scale-IV ( p d = 0.90) was found for methylphenidate. Treatment was generally well tolerated. Conclusions Euthymic youths with bipolar disorder and ADHD may benefit from short-term concomitant treatment with methylphenidate. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry , 2007;46(11):1445-1453.

Objective The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of psychostimulant medication in a naturalistic sample of preschoolers. Benefits and side effects for methylphenidate and mixed amphetamine salts (Adderall) were examined. Method Twenty-eight preschoolers (ages 4.0–5.9) participated in the present investigation. They were obtained consecutively from a large sample of suburban children assessed for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. After having received various dosing levels of a stimulant in a placebo-controlled crossover design, best dose was assigned based on the lowest Abbreviated Symptoms Questionnaire T score received in a given week. All analyses compared best dose ratings to placebo ratings. Results Preschoolers' behavioral ratings by parents and teachers were improved as a function of stimulant medication. More than 82% of the medicated sample improved their behavioral rating by at least 1 SD as demonstrated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, with more than 50% of medicated preschoolers improving by more than 2 SD. Side effects were infrequent at best dose of medication. Conclusions Clinically significant changes in behavioral ratings of preschoolers were noted in response to stimulant medication. Both stimulants were well tolerated. ROC curves were useful for clearly depicting on a case-by-case basis how much improvement was derived from psychopharmacological treatment.

Stimulant medication has, for many years, been the pharmacological treatment of choice for children and adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Recently, several studies have documented the efficacy of a new stimulant, Adderall. Although these initial studies provide useful information for clinicians treating ADHD children, their method of data presentation has provided limited information about the clinical significance of drug effects. Thus, to address the issue of clinical significance, we completed drug-placebo response curve analyses of a blinded, placebo-controlled study of Adderall and methylphenidate (MPH). Our results show that the efficacy of Adderall and MPH to improve functioning is seen throughout the full range of improvement scores. Both drugs prevent worsening and, for a majority of patients, lead to improvements that are well into the normal range. The analyses also highlight an important subgroup of placebo responders, which suggests that future research should focus on how to predict robust placebo response in ADHD patients.

Objective To examine the relationship between age and short-term clinical response to psychostimulant treatment in youths with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and to examine whether weight-corrected doses of optimized psychostimulant therapy varied as a function of patient age. Method One hundred seventy-seven patients were treated with either methylphenidate (MPH) or Adderall ® (ADL). Sixty-six youths received ADL and 111 patients were treated with MPH. All youths were evaluated at baseline and after receiving a week of treatment at each blinded, randomized dose level (placebo, 5, 10, or 15 mg). A "best dose" for each patient was assigned before the medication blind was broken. Behavioral ratings by both teachers and parents were examined for dose and medication effects. Results The medications had similar efficacy in children and teenagers. Older youths, however, benefited from a smaller weight-adjusted dose of medication than did the younger children. Similar efficacy was observed between the medications. Conclusions These data suggest that psychostimulants are equally effective in treating children and adolescents with ADHD. Adolescents with ADHD may not necessarily require more medication than younger children to achieve a similar therapeutic response.

Objective The primary purpose of this study was to examine the cardiovascular effects of Adderall ® (ADL) in a clinic-based group of youths with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder ranging in age from 4 to 17 years. Method One hundred thirty-seven patients were treated with either methylphenidate (MPH) or ADL. Youths prescribed MPH were given medication twice daily, and youths treated with ADL received medication once daily. Patients were evaluated under five conditions: baseline, placebo, 5 mg/dose, 10 mg/dose, or 15 mg/dose. Resting pulse, diastolic blood pressure, and systolic blood pressure were examined after 1 week at each treatment condition. Changes from baseline on these parameters were examined. Results The short-term cardiovascular effects of both ADL and MPH were modest. No patients experienced any clinically significant change in these cardiovascular measures during the course of this brief trial. Conclusion Since the short-term cardiovascular effects of ADL appear minimal, specific cardiovascular monitoring during short-term ADL treatment at doses of 15 mg/day or less does not appear to be indicated. In addition, under similar conditions, using similar methods, both medication treatments led to changes in blood pressure and pulse that were clinically insignificant.

Objective This study compared relative effects of whole green coffee powder (WGCP) on cognitive functioning in neurotypical adults under three treatment conditions: placebo (A), low-dose 889.9 mg WGCP (B1), and moderate-dose 1334.4 mg WGCP (B2). Method Fourteen adults aged 18–25 years, acted as their own controls in three treatment conditions within a seven-session withdrawal design. Participants completed the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) at each session. The Side Effects Behavior Monitoring Scale (SEBMS), used to assess stimulant effects in individuals with ADHD, was a secondary outcome measure to assess adverse events associated with caffeine intake delivered by capsule. Self-report of qualitative effects was collected. Results Results indicated that moderate doses of WGCP significantly improved sustained attention (vs placebo and low dose) and working memory (vs low dose only) but had no effect on response inhibition. Low doses of WGCP showed decreased sustained attention. Fifty percent of subjects reported positive subjective improvement in well-being. No side effects were reported. Conclusion Commercially available WGCP (ie, sold as GoBean®) in moderate doses improved executive functioning for sustained attention and working memory but had no effect on response inhibition. Implications for individuals with attention difficulties are discussed.

(1983). Increasing Teacher Delivery of Contingent Praise and Contingent Materials Using Consultant Feedback and Praise. School Psychology Review: Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 340-346.

The purpose of this chapter is to examine and interpret the results of diversion and neighborhood delinquency programs, both of which contain some similarities and differences. In a general sense, both are designed to divert youths from delinquency and, given that their intent is the same, the division into the two categories is somewhat arbitrary. For historical reasons, however, diversion refers to alternatives for those youths who would otherwise be processed in a court of law and, in some cases, be placed in a correctional institution. In contrast, neighborhood programs are designed for those youths considered at higher risk for delinquency than other youths, rather than as alternatives for court processing. Though some neighborhood programs accept court referrals, these programs are not under the jurisdiction of the court and accept referrals from other sources. Participation in neighborhood programs is voluntary.

The application of activated carbon for control of gasoline vapor emissions resulting from service station operations was investigated under laboratory conditions. Cyclic tests were conducted on five activated carbon materials at various combinations of temperature, humidity, fuel volatility and container shape to determine working capacity characteristics. Regeneration of the carbon was effected by air purging and vacuum stripping. Activated carbon presaturated with gasoline vapors was tested for recovery, and a 1,000-cycle test was conducted to investigate longevity and heel composition. Laboratory data were projected to facilitate sizing of activated carbon beds for a typical 50,000-gallon/month service station. /Author/