Search

Prior literature has associated preoperative corticosteroid shoulder injection (CSI) with infection following shoulder surgery. A recent study found an equally elevated risk of total knee arthroplasty infection with preoperative injection of either CSI or hyaluronic acid. The implication is that violation of a joint prior to surgery, even in the absence of corticosteroid, may pose an elevated risk of infection following orthopedic surgery. The aim of the present study was to determine whether violation of the shoulder joint for Magnetic Resonance Arthrogram (MRA) poses an elevated risk of infection following shoulder arthroscopy and to compare this risk to that introduced by preoperative CSI.A national, all-payer database was queried to identify patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy between January 2015 and October 2020. Patients were stratified into the following groups: (1) no CSI or MRA within 6 months of surgery (n = 5,000), (2) CSI within 2 weeks of surgery (n = 1,055), (3) CSI between 2 and 4 weeks prior to surgery (n = 2,575), (4) MRA within 2 weeks of surgery (n = 414), (5) MRA between 2 and 4 weeks prior to surgery (n = 1,138). Postoperative infection (septic shoulder or surgical site infection) was analyzed at 90-days, 1-year, and 2-years postoperatively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis controlled for differences among groups.MRA within 2 weeks prior to shoulder surgery was associated with an increased risk of infection at 1 year (OR, 2.17; P = 0.007), while MRA 2-4 weeks preceding surgery was not associated with an increased risk of postoperative infection at any time point. By comparison, CSI within 2 weeks prior to surgery was associated with an increased risk of postoperative infection at 90-days (OR, 1.72; P = 0.022), 1-year (OR, 1.65; P = 0.005) and 2-years (OR, 1.63; P = 0.002) following surgery. Similarly, CSI 2-4 weeks prior to surgery was associated with an increased risk of postoperative infection at 90-days (OR, 1.83; P0.001), 1-year (OR, 1.62; P0.001), and 2-years (OR, 1.79; P0.001).Preoperative CSI within 4 weeks of shoulder arthroscopy elevates the risk of postoperative infection. Needle arthrotomy for shoulder MRA elevates the risk of infection in a more limited fashion. Avoidance of MRA within 2 weeks of shoulder arthroscopy may mitigate postoperative infection risk. Additionally, the association between preoperative CSI and postoperative infection may be more attributed to medication profile than to needle arthrotomy.

Background: Perioperative education and socioeconomic factors influence patient behavior. Recent evidence has suggested that sling compliance is associated with improved outcomes after shoulder surgery; it is important to investigate factors that influence sling compliance. Purpose: To determine the associations between postoperative sling wear and patients’ understanding of sling necessity, postoperative home assistance, and social deprivation. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A total of 66 patients were prospectively enrolled from 2018 to 2020 if they were ≥18 years of age and undergoing shoulder surgery requiring a sling for at least 1 month postoperatively. Sling wear was measured using a temperature-sensing device. At 6 weeks postoperatively, patients’ understanding for sling necessity was determined by their response to a question on the Medical Adherence Measure questionnaire, “Why did you have to wear a shoulder sling?” The Patient Understanding Grading Scale (PUGS) was developed to quantify patient responses. PUGS was graded 1 to 3, with grade 1 corresponding to the least technical knowledge. Patient characteristics, social deprivation (Area Deprivation Index [ADI]), and home assistance were additionally analyzed. Results: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between patients when stratified by PUGS grade. Multivariable linear regression analysis for total hours of sling wear per week showed that patients with PUGS grade 2 (β, 48.2 hours; P = .007) and grade 3 (β, 59.5 hours; P = .003) wore their slings significantly more than grade 1 patients. Patients with home assistance had significantly greater day hours (73.5 ± 33.0 vs 44.0 ± 24.5 hours; P = .037) of sling wear per week, but there was no difference in night sling hours. Patients older than 60 years wore their slings significantly more, while men and those with a higher body mass index (BMI) wore their slings significantly less. ADI was not significantly associated with sling wear. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that patients with greater understanding for sling necessity, those with home assistance, and patients >60 years have greater sling wear, while male patients and those with a higher BMI have lower sling compliance. ADI was not a significant contributor.

Background: The pattern of glenoid bone loss (GBL) in anterior glenohumeral instability is well described. It was recognized recently that posterior GBL after instability has a posteroinferior pattern. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare GBL patterns in a matched cohort of patients with anterior versus posterior glenohumeral instability. The hypothesis was that the GBL pattern in posterior instability would be more inferior than the GBL pattern in anterior instability. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, 28 patients with posterior instability were matched with 28 patients with anterior instability by age, sex and number of instability events. GBL location was defined using a clockface model. Obliquity was defined as the angle between the long axis of the glenoid and a line tangent to the GBL. Superior and inferior GBL were measured as areas and defined relative to the equator. The primary outcome was the 2-dimensional characterization of posterior versus anterior GBL. The secondary outcome was a comparison of the posterior GBL patterns in traumatic and atraumatic instability mechanisms in an expanded cohort of 42 patients. Results: The mean age of the matched cohorts (n = 56) was 25.2 ± 9.87 years. The median obliquity of GBL was 27.53° (interquartile range [IQR], 18.83°-47.38°) in the posterior cohort and 9.28° (IQR, 6.68°-15.75°) in the anterior cohort ( P < .001). The mean superior-to-inferior bone loss ratio was 0.48 ± 0.51 in the posterior cohort and 0.80 ± 0.55 ( P = .032) in the anterior cohort. In the expanded posterior instability cohort (n = 42), patients with traumatic injury mechanism (n = 22), had a similar GBL obliquity compared to patients with an atraumatic injury mechanism (n = 20) (mean, 27.73° [95% CI, 20.26°-35.20°] vs 32.20° [95% CI, 21.27°-43.14°], respectively) ( P = .49). Conclusion: Posterior GBL occurred more inferiorly and at an increased obliquity compared with anterior GBL. This pattern is consistent for traumatic and atraumatic posterior GBL. Bone loss along the equator may not be the most reliable predictor of posterior instability, and critical bone loss may be reached more rapidly than a model of loss along the equator may predict.