Search

Supplementary Figures 1-8

Figure S1 shows combination treatment induces splenomegaly and T cells Apoptosis Figure S2 shows PD-L1 is increased on splenic T cells with combination treatment Figure S3 shows combination treatment increases costimulatory receptors on T cells Figure S4 shows delayed anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 are ineffective at tumor control Figure S5 shows sequential combination provides anti-tumor immunity in the 4T1 model. Figure S6 shows sequential combination does not induce inflammatory cytokines Figure S7 shows sequential combination does not increase costimulatory receptors Figure S8 shows combination treatment induces functional PyMT-specific T cells

Purpose: Antibodies specific for inhibitory checkpoints PD-1 and CTLA-4 have shown impressive results against solid tumors. This has fueled interest in novel immunotherapy combinations to affect patients who remain refractory to checkpoint blockade monotherapy. However, how to optimally combine checkpoint blockade with agents targeting T-cell costimulatory receptors, such as OX40, remains a critical question.Experimental Design: We utilized an anti-PD-1–refractory, orthotopically transplanted MMTV-PyMT mammary cancer model to investigate the antitumor effect of an agonist anti-OX40 antibody combined with anti-PD-1. As PD-1 naturally aids in immune contraction after T-cell activation, we treated mice with concurrent combination treatment versus sequentially administering anti-OX40 followed by anti-PD-1.Results: The concurrent addition of anti-PD-1 significantly attenuated the therapeutic effect of anti-OX40 alone. Combination-treated mice had considerable increases in type I and type II serum cytokines and significantly augmented expression of inhibitory receptors or exhaustion markers CTLA-4 and TIM-3 on T cells. Combination treatment increased intratumoral CD4+ T-cell proliferation at day 13, but at day 19, both CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell proliferation was significantly reduced compared with untreated mice. In two tumor models, sequential combination of anti-OX40 followed by anti-PD-1 (but not the reverse order) resulted in significant increases in therapeutic efficacy. Against MMTV-PyMT tumors, sequential combination was dependent on both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and completely regressed tumors in approximately 30% of treated animals.Conclusions: These results highlight the importance of timing for optimized therapeutic effect with combination immunotherapies and suggest the testing of sequencing in combination immunotherapy clinical trials. Clin Cancer Res; 23(20); 6165–77. ©2017 AACR.See related commentary by Colombo, p. 5999

In our opinion the most urgent needs to improve patient outcomes are: 1) a deeper ability to measure cancer immunobiology, and 2) increased availability of agents that, coupled with predictive biomarkers, will be used to tailor anti-cancer immunity. Tailoring effective immunotherapy will entail combinations of immunotherapeutics that augment priming of anti-cancer immunity, boost expansion of effector and memory cells of the T, B and NK lineage, amplify innate immunity and relieve checkpoint inhibition. Alternatives to inducing adaptive immunity to cancer include synthetic immunology that incorporate bi-specifics that target T cells to cancer or adoptive immunotherapy with gene-modified immune cells.

Background SARS-CoV-2 (CoV2) has precipitated a global pandemic and the effectiveness of standard vaccine strategies to induce potent and persistent immunity to CoV2 is in question, particularly for the elderly. This problem is not dissimilar to what we have struggled with in our quest to induce immunity to cancer antigens, where vaccine-induced anti-cancer immune responses can be weak. Here, we describe a novel vaccine approach which leverages electroporation (EP) of a plasmid encoding a prefusion stabilized CoV2 spike protein (CORVax). As IL-12 has been shown to augment the efficacy of immunotherapy in aged mice,1 we have initiated studies to evaluate if plasmid IL-12 (TAVO™) can similarly augment anti-CoV2 immune responses in young mice and have planned studies in aged animals. Methods A prefusion stabilized CoV2 spike plasmid expression vector was constructed, a master cell bank generated and clinical-grade plasmid manufactured. C57BL/6 and BALB/c were vaccinated via intramuscular (IM) and/or intradermal (ID) injection followed immediately by EP of plasmids encoding the CoV2 spike protein with or without plasmid-encoded murine IL-12 on days 1 and 14 or 21. Mice were followed for >120 days to assess safety. Splenocytes and serum were harvested at different time points to interrogate virus-specific cellular responses as well anti-spike IgG1/IgG2 antibody titers. A surrogate viral neutralization test (sVNT) assessed serum blockade of soluble hACE2R binding to immobilized CoV2 spike. Results Preliminary data shows that EP of CORVax alone or combined with IL-12 was safe. EP of CORVax was able to elicit anti-Spike IgG antibodies (IC50 = 1/2112), as well as IgG antibodies targeting the receptor binding domain of the Spike protein (IC50 = 1/965) approximately 40 days after the booster vaccination. In 2 of 2 experiments, CORVax combined with IL-12 significantly (P Conclusions Early preclinical data shows that EP of CORVax can induce IgG responses to CoV2 Spike and the receptor binding domain (RBD) as well as apparent viral neutralizing activity. The addition of IL-12, at least transiently, increased sVNT titer. We plan to investigate alternate vaccine boosting strategies while extending these studies into aged animals and initiate a clinical trial in the near future. References Ruby CE, Weinberg AD. OX40-Enhanced tumor rejection and effector T cell differentiation decreases with age. J Immunol2009;182:1481–9. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.182.3.1481.

Purpose: Antibodies specific for inhibitory checkpoints PD-1 and CTLA-4 have shown impressive results against solid tumors. This has fueled interest in novel immunotherapy combinations to affect patients who remain refractory to checkpoint blockade monotherapy. However, how to optimally combine checkpoint blockade with agents targeting T-cell costimulatory receptors, such as OX40, remains a critical question.Experimental Design: We utilized an anti-PD-1–refractory, orthotopically transplanted MMTV-PyMT mammary cancer model to investigate the antitumor effect of an agonist anti-OX40 antibody combined with anti-PD-1. As PD-1 naturally aids in immune contraction after T-cell activation, we treated mice with concurrent combination treatment versus sequentially administering anti-OX40 followed by anti-PD-1.Results: The concurrent addition of anti-PD-1 significantly attenuated the therapeutic effect of anti-OX40 alone. Combination-treated mice had considerable increases in type I and type II serum cytokines and significantly augmented expression of inhibitory receptors or exhaustion markers CTLA-4 and TIM-3 on T cells. Combination treatment increased intratumoral CD4+ T-cell proliferation at day 13, but at day 19, both CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell proliferation was significantly reduced compared with untreated mice. In two tumor models, sequential combination of anti-OX40 followed by anti-PD-1 (but not the reverse order) resulted in significant increases in therapeutic efficacy. Against MMTV-PyMT tumors, sequential combination was dependent on both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and completely regressed tumors in approximately 30% of treated animals.Conclusions: These results highlight the importance of timing for optimized therapeutic effect with combination immunotherapies and suggest the testing of sequencing in combination immunotherapy clinical trials. Clin Cancer Res; 23(20); 6165–77. ©2017 AACR.See related commentary by Colombo, p. 5999

The importance of anti-tumor immunity by CD8+ T cells is well defined, but antigen-specific immune monitoring for CD8+ responses across many potential tumor antigens is expensive and difficult. This difficulty is compounded by increasing evidence that every tumor has unique mutant neoepitopes. We hypothesized that new technologies in peptide printing might allow us to partially overcome this obstacle by instead characterizing antibody responses against a paired array of neoepitope and native peptides. We designed a 15-mer peptide array of mutated and native peptides from the murine mammary carcinoma 4T1 and used it to characterize the serum IgG antibody responses to vaccination with 4T1 autophagosome-enriched vaccine (DRibbles), poly-IC adjuvant, the combination of both, or naïve animals across 4 independent experiments. This array was printed by JPT peptides and included 75 pairs of single-nucleotide polymorphic and native peptides identified by both our own whole exome sequencing and the current 4T1 literature. We also included other sequences of interest to 4T1 immunity such as the retrovirus fragment AH1. MHCI peptide predictions were robust and used the top NetMHCpan v2.8 score from all possible windowed 8,9,10, and 11-mers for H2-Kd,Ld, and Dd surrounding the mutation site in its native protein context. The results of this work identify a linear correlation between higher predicted peptide MHCI binding affinity and the IgG antibody signals increased in combination treated groups versus controls. Linear regression analysis demonstrates that normalized antibody responses to mutated and native 4T1 peptides are more likely to be higher in sera from autophagosome-enriched vaccine plus poly-IC treated animals than naïve animals if these peptides contain higher affinity domains for MHCI (p These results identify a previously unknown link between predicted MHCI binding affinity and the anti-tumor antibody response following combination immunotherapy - suggesting some antigen-specific interaction between B cells and CD8+ T cells that might be exploited to improve the immune monitoring of cancer therapies. Citation Format: Tyler W. Hulett, Shawn Jensen, Christopher Dubay, Carlo Bifulco, Michael Afentoulis, Ashok Reddy, Larry David, Bernard A. Fox. Increased IgG antibody responses to neoepitope and native peptides containing high affinity domains for MHCI following combination cancer immunotherapy. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 4900.