Search

Objective To evaluate the prognostic significance of detectable circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) BRAF V600E/K mutations in patients with advanced melanoma enrolled in a clinical trial without BRAF-targeted therapy. Patients and Methods BRAF V600E/K mutation status was determined on archived tissue and pretreatment stored plasma from 149 patients with unresectable stage IV melanoma who were enrolled between May 5, 2010 and May 2, 2014 in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group/Alliance N0879 randomized phase 2 clinical trial. Results were reported as presence or absence of cfDNA BRAF V600E/K detection of assay vs tissue. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed for patients with and without detectable BRAF mutation. Results In total, 63 of 149 (42.3%) patients had BRAF V600E/K results for tissue and blood, and 20 of 63 (31.7%) patients had tissue-diagnosed mutant BRAF. Of these, 11 of 20 (55.0%) patients had detectable plasma cfDNA BRAF. Among patients with tissue-mutant BRAF V600E/K, PFS and OS were shorter for those with corresponding cfDNA mutations (PFS, 5.8 vs 12.0 months; P=.051; OS, 9.2 vs 27.1 months; P=.054). Our assay demonstrated sensitivity of 55% (95% CI, 0.322 to 0.768), specificity of 97.7% (95% CI, 0.932 to 1.000), positive predictive value of 91.7% (95% CI, 0.760 to 1.000), and negative predictive value of 82.4% (95% CI, 0.719 to 0.928). Conclusion In advanced melanoma, detectable cfDNA BRAF V600E/K mutation is present in about half the patients with stage IV with BRAF-mutant melanoma tumor tissue and appears to confer a poorer prognosis when detectable. Given the poorer prognosis, cfDNA can be used to risk-stratify patients with metastatic melanoma in practice or clinical trials.Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00976573

Introduction Precision oncology (PO) is a growing treatment approach in the era of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and matched therapies. Effective delivery of PO in the community has not been extensively studied. Our program developed a virtual molecular tumor board (MTB) strategy to help guide PO care. Materials and Methods Over 18 months, eligible adult patients with advanced, incurable solid tumor malignancies were enrolled in a molecular profiling (MP) study using the Foundation Medicine NGS panel. Results were reviewed through a weekly, videoconferenced MTB conducted across our largely rural integrated health system. Recommendations from the MTB were used to identify actionable alterations (AAs). Feasibility of PO care delivery was assessed as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the frequency of AAs, genomic matched treatments, genomic matched clinical trial enrollment, and clinical outcomes. Results A total of 120 participants with a variety of advanced tumor types were enrolled. Of these, 109 (90.8%) had successful MP. Treatment on the basis of an AA was recommended by the MTB in 58% of patients (63 of 109) who had a successful MP result. For those completing MP, treatments included enrollment in a genomic matched clinical trial (n = 16; 14.6%) and genomic matched treatment with a Food and Drug Administration–approved agent (n = 23; 21.1%). Response and survival data were similar regardless of the matched treatment option chosen. Conclusion A video-conferenced MTB-facilitated NGS testing and treatment delivery system was implemented in our integrated community oncology program. Continued use of this model aims to increase understanding of the impact of PO in this setting.

Background. A phase I, dose-escalation study of AT-101 with cisplatin and etoposide was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), safety and pharmacokinetics in patients with advanced solid tumors, with an expanded cohort in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) to assess preliminary activity. Methods. In the dose escalation portion, increasing doses of AT-101 were administered orally BID on days 1–3 along with cisplatin on day 1 and etoposide on days 1–3 of a 21 day cycle. At the RP2D, an additional 7 patients with untreated ES-SCLC were enrolled. Results. Twenty patients were enrolled in the dose-escalation cohort, and 7 patients with ES-SCLC were enrolled in the expanded cohort. The MTD/RP2D was established at AT-101 40 mg BID days 1–3 with cisplatin 60 mg/m2 and etoposide 120 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 21 day cycle with pegfilgrastim support. Two DLTs of neutropenic fever were seen at dose level 1. After the addition of pegfilgrastim, no additional DLTs were observed. Grade 3/4 treatment-related toxicities included: diarrhea, increased AST, neutropenia, hypophosphatemia, hyponatremia, myocardial infarction and pulmonary embolism. No apparent PK interactions were observed between the agents. Preliminary activity was observed with PRs in patients with ES-SCLC, high-grade neuroendocrine tumor, esophageal cancer and NSCLC. Conclusions. AT-101 with cisplatin and etoposide is well tolerated with growth factor support. Anti-tumor activity was observed in a variety of cancers including ES-SCLC, supporting further investigation with BH-3 mimetics in combination with standard chemotherapy for ES-SCLC.

493 Background: Treatment paradigms for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) continue to evolve with increasing use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and chemoradiation (NACR). Variations in the definition of BRPC and in neoadjuvant approaches have made standardization of care for BRPC difficult. We report an effort to standardize management of BRPC throughout Sanford Health, a largely rural community oncology (CO) network in the Upper Midwest. Methods: Starting in February 2014, cases of PC without evidence of metastatic disease were categorized as BRPC if they met one or more of the following criteria: 1) abutment of superior mesenteric, common hepatic or celiac arteries with < 180o involvement 2) venous involvement deemed potentially reconstructable and/or 3) biopsy proven regional lymph node involvement. Patients with BRPC were treated with NAC followed by reimaging and surgery if resectable; if disease remained BRPC, patients underwent NACR and surgical re-evaluation. NAC was administered at 5 CO sites in the Sanford network; NACR and surgery were performed at 2 high volume centers. Results: Forty-three patients from 2/2014-4/2017 were diagnosed with BRPC. Median age of patients was 64 (range 39-83); 56% were male. 42/43 patients received NAC as initial therapy, with 1 receiving NACR due to patient preference. 90% of patients receiving NAC received mFOLFIRINOX (38/42), with FOLFIRI (1) and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (3) also utilized. 11/42 (26%) patients had resectable disease after NAC and underwent surgery; 23 (55%) proceeded to NACR. Overall, 26/43 (61%) went to surgery with 18 (42%) able to undergo resection. Of those, 12/18 (67%) attained R0 resection and 10/18 (56%) were pathologic N0. Primary tumor location (head v. body/tail), age, pretreatment CA19-9, change in CA19-9 with treatment and NACR were not associated with a higher likelihood of resection. Conclusions: This report demonstrates the feasibility of implementing a standardized approach to BRPC across multiple CO sites over a wide geographic area. Adherance to protocol therapies was good and surgical outcomes are similar to many reported series; survival data is maturing and will be presented at the meeting.

e18036Background: While molecular profiling (MP) is becoming widely accessible, clinician understanding may be a barrier to GMCT enrollment. MP programs at academic medical centers report GMCT enro...

Background. Malignant mesothelioma is a highly treatment-resistant neoplasm. This study represents an attempt to define an effective form of systemic therapy. Methods. Twenty-six patients with unresectable diffuse malignant mesothelioma were enrolled in Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) study 8731 and treated with ifosfamide, 2 g/m2 intravenously for 4 days, and mesna 2 g/m2 intravenously for 5 days, every 3 weeks. Patients were either previously untreated with chemotherapy or had at most one prior systemic treatment. Results. Two patients, or 8% (95% confidence interval, 1-25%), achieved partial response, with response durations of 4 and 6 months. One additional patient met criteria for tumor size reduction but not duration criteria. Thirteen (50%) patients had stable disease of 4 months' median duration (range, 1-13 months). The median survival of the entire group was 6.5 months. The dose-limiting toxicity was granulocytopenia (11 patients, ≤ 250/μl). Conclusions. Ifosfamide/mesna has modest activity in malignant mesothelioma. It could be tested using alternate dosage schedules and in combination with other agents in treating this highly resistant neoplasm.

This study involved the administration of amonafide intravenously 300 mg/m2 daily times five days every three weeks to 16 refractory and relapsed myeloma patients. Doses were escalated to toxicity. These doses caused severe thrombocytopenia and granulocytopenia in seven patients. No responses were seen in this heavily pretreated group of patients.

Thirty-one patients with multiple myeloma refractory to therapy or relapsing after response to initial therapy were treated with Fludarabine Phosphate utilizing a daily intravenous schedule for five consecutive days. There were no objective responses seen and only one patient showed clinical improvement. Myelosuppression manifest as leucopenia and granulocytopenia was the primary toxicity seen. Fludarabine Phosphate is inactive in previously treated myeloma patients when given by the daily intravenous route.

At present there is no established standard chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Combination regimens have yielded response rates at times exceeding 50% but with no improvement in survival compared to single agents. This study examined the role of 5-fluorouracil and high-dose levamisole in a phase II setting using survival as the main endpoint. Patients with advanced carcinomas of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction were treated with 5-fluorouracil, 450 mg/m2 IV days 1 to 5, and levamisole, 100 mg/m2 orally three times daily on days 1 to 3, and 50 mg/m2 tid days 4 to 5 every 5 weeks. To allow more rapid accrual and to study a population that more accurately reflects the makeup of patients treated in clinical practice, patients with both measurable and nonmeasurable disease were entered in this study. Two of fifteen (13%) patients with measurable disease experienced a partial response to treatment. The adjusted 1-year survival rate for the 44 patients entered was 29.6%, which is similar to the historical 1-year survival of 30% observed in a group of nearly 400 patients treated in prior North Central Cancer Treatment Group studies. This regimen offers no improvement in therapeutic activity for advanced gastric cancer. This study design, however, allows rapid screening of phase II regimens in patients who would usually be candidates for phase III trials.

Patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer were given induction chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, cisplatin, and etoposide (COPE) every 3 weeks for four cycles. Responding patients then received chest and elective whole-brain irradiation. Patients presenting with brain metastases received therapeutic brain irradiation during the first cycle of chemotherapy. No maintenance therapy was given, but two late intensification cycles of COPE were given at weeks 24 and 48. Among the 34 evaluable patients, the response rate to induction chemotherapy was 59%, with 10% achieving a complete response (CR) and 49%, a partial response (PR). Of the 18 patients who completed chest irradiation, 3 achieved a CR, producing an overall CR rate of 18%. Five patients completed the projected course of treatment. The median duration of response for all patients was 8 months (range, 2-30+ months) and the median survival was 9 months (range, 1-30+ months). Complete responders had a median response duration of 9 months and a median survival of 11 months. This regimen produced significant myelosuppression, with 5 neutropenic deaths (13%) occurring in the 38 patients evaluable for toxicity; an additional 16% required hospitalization for fever while neutropenic. Only six patients (13%) had nadir platelet counts of less than 50,000/mm3 with no episodes of thrombocytopenic hemorrhage. Nausea, vomiting, and neurotoxicity were mild to moderate in all patients. One patient with no evidence of disease died of radiation pneumonitis at 6 months. While producing significant toxicity, this regimen did not result in a CR rate or survival advantage that would suggest its superiority over standard regimens for small-cell lung cancer.