Search

OBJECTIVE To determine the prevalence and prognostic significance of unrecognized myocardial infarction (MI) by delayed-enhancement MRI (DE-MRI) in asymptomatic patients with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In this prospective, two-center study of asymptomatic patients without known cardiac disease (n = 120), two prespecified cohorts underwent a research MRI: 1) a high-risk group with type 1 diabetes and chronic renal insufficiency (n = 50) and 2) an average-risk group with type 2 diabetes (n = 70). The primary end point was a composite of all-cause mortality and clinical MI. RESULTS Overall, the prevalence of unrecognized MI was 19% by DE-MRI (28% high-risk group and 13% average-risk group) and 5% by electrocardiography. During up to 5 years of follow-up with a total of 460 patient-years of follow-up, the rate of death/MI was markedly higher in patients with diabetes with (vs. without) unrecognized MI (all 44% vs. 7%, high-risk group 43% vs. 6%, and average-risk group 44% vs. 8%; all P < 0.01). After adjustment for Framingham risk score, left ventricular ejection fraction, and diabetes type, the presence of unrecognized MI by DE-MRI conferred an eightfold increase in risk of death/MI (95% CI 3.0–21.1, P < 0.0001). Addition of unrecognized MI to clinical indices significantly improved model discrimination for adverse events (integrated discrimination improvement = 0.156, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Unrecognized MI is prevalent in asymptomatic patients with diabetes without a history of cardiac disease and confers a markedly increased risk of death and clinical MI.

To determine the prevalence and prognostic significance of unrecognized myocardial infarction (MI) by delayed-enhancement MRI (DE-MRI) in asymptomatic patients with diabetes.In this prospective, two-center study of asymptomatic patients without known cardiac disease (Overall, the prevalence of unrecognized MI was 19% by DE-MRI (28% high-risk group and 13% average-risk group) and 5% by electrocardiography. During up to 5 years of follow-up with a total of 460 patient-years of follow-up, the rate of death/MI was markedly higher in patients with diabetes with (vs. without) unrecognized MI (all 44% vs. 7%, high-risk group 43% vs. 6%, and average-risk group 44% vs. 8%; allUnrecognized MI is prevalent in asymptomatic patients with diabetes without a history of cardiac disease and confers a markedly increased risk of death and clinical MI.

Inflammation has been shown to be a major component in the pathophysiology of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). In patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), a critical component of the ACS spectrum, multiple coronary arteries are involved during this inflammatory process. In addition to the coronary vasculature, the inflammatory cascade has also been shown to affect the carotid arteries and possibly the aorta.To assess the involvement of the aorta during AMI by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR).We prospectively evaluated the aortic wall by CMR in 123 patients. 78 patients were enrolled from the emergency department (ED), who presented with chest pain and were classified as either: (1) AMI: elevated troponin levels and typical chest pain or (2) non-cardiac chest pain (CP): negative troponins and a normal stress test or normal cardiac catheterization. We compared these 2 groups to a group of 45 asymptomatic diabetic patients. The descending thoracic aortic wall area (AWA) and maximal aortic wall thickness (AWT) were measured using a double inversion recovery T-2 weighted, ECG-gated, spin echo sequence by CMR.Patients with AMI were older, more likely to smoke, had a higher incidence of claudication, and had higher CRP levels. The AWA and maximal AWT were greater in patients who presented to the ED with ACS (2.11+/-0.17 mm(2), and 3.17+/-0.19 mm, respectively) than both patients presenting with non-cardiac CP (1.52+/-0.58 mm(2), p0.001; and 2.57+/-0.10 mm, p0.001) and the diabetic patients (1.38+/-0.58 mm(2), p0.001; and 2.30+/-0.131 mm, p0.001). The difference in the aortic wall characteristics remained significant after correcting for body mass index, hyperlipidemia, statins and C-reactive protein. There was no difference in maximal AWT or AWA between patients with non-cardiac CP and patients with diabetes.Patients with AMI have a significantly greater maximal aortic wall thickness and area compared to patients with non-cardiac CP. Longitudinal studies are needed to assess whether this increase is due to inflammation or a higher atherosclerotic burden.

Background— The identification and assessment of myocardial infarction (MI) are important for therapeutic and prognostic purposes, yet current recommended diagnostic strategies have significant limitations. We prospectively tested the performance of delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with gadolinium-based contrast for the detection of MI in an international, multicenter trial. Methods and Results— Patients with their first MI were enrolled in an acute (≤16 days after MI; n=282) or chronic (17 days to 6 months; n=284) arm and then randomized to 1 of 4 doses of gadoversetamide: 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, or 0.3 mmol/kg. Standard delayed-enhancement MRI was performed before contrast (control) and 10 and 30 minutes after gadoversetamide. For blinded analysis, precontrast and postcontrast MRIs were randomized and then scored for enhanced regions by 3 independent readers not associated with the study. The infarct-related artery perfusion territory was scored from x-ray angiograms separately. In total, 566 scans were performed in 26 centers using commercially available scanners from all major US/European vendors. All scans were included in the analysis. The sensitivity of MRI for detecting MI increased with rising dose of gadoversetamide ( P P P Conclusions— Gadoversetamide-enhanced MRI using doses of ≥0.2 mmol/kg is effective in the detection and assessment of both acute and chronic MI. This study represents the first multicenter trial designed to evaluate an imaging approach for detecting MI.

ObjectivesWe tested a pre-defined visual interpretation algorithm that combines cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) data from perfusion and infarction imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD).BackgroundCardiovascular magnetic resonance can assess both myocardial perfusion and infarction with independent techniques in a single session.MethodsWe prospectively enrolled 100 consecutive patients with suspected CAD scheduled for X-ray coronary angiography. Patients had comprehensive clinical evaluation, including Rose angina questionnaire, 12-lead electrocardiography, C-reactive protein, and calculation of Framingham risk. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance included cine, adenosine-stress and rest perfusion-CMR, and delayed enhancement-CMR (DE-CMR) for infarction imaging. Matched stress-rest perfusion defects in the absence of infarction by DE-CMR were considered artifactual. All patients underwent X-ray angiography within 24 h of CMR.ResultsNinety-two patients had complete CMR examinations. Significant CAD (≥70% stenosis) was found in 37 patients (40%). The combination of perfusion and DE-CMR had a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 89%, 87%, and 88%, respectively, for CAD diagnosis, compared with 84%, 58%, and 68%, respectively, for perfusion-CMR alone. The combination had higher specificity and accuracy (p < 0.0001), owing to incorporating the exceptionally high specificity (98%) of DE-CMR. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated the combination provided better performance than cine, perfusion, or DE-CMR alone. The accuracy was high in single-vessel and multivessel disease and independent of CAD location. Multivariable analysis including standard clinical parameters demonstrated the combination was the strongest independent CAD predictor.ConclusionsA combined perfusion and infarction CMR examination with a visual interpretation algorithm can accurately diagnose CAD in the clinical setting. The combination is superior to perfusion-CMR alone.

Myocardial infarcts are routinely detected by nuclear imaging techniques such as single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging. A newly developed technique for infarct detection based on contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has higher spatial resolution than SPECT. We postulated that this technique would detect infarcts missed by SPECT.We did contrast-enhanced CMR and SPECT examinations in 91 patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease. All CMR and SPECT images were scored, using a 14-segment model, for the presence, location, and spatial extent of infarction. To compare each imaging modality to a gold standard, we also acquired contrast-enhanced CMR and SPECT images in 12 dogs with, and three dogs without, myocardial infarction as defined by histochemical staining.In animals, contrast-enhanced CMR and SPECT detected all segments with nearly transmural infarction (75% transmural extent of the left-ventricular wall). CMR also identified 100 of the 109 segments (92%) with subendocardial infarction (50% transmural extent of the left-ventricular wall), whereas SPECT identified only 31 (28%). SPECT and CMR showed high specificity for the detection of infarction (97% and 98%, respectively). In patients, all segments with nearly transmural infarction, as defined by contrast-enhanced CMR, were detected by SPECT. However, of the 181 segments with subendocardial infarction, 85 (47%) were not detected by SPECT. On a per patient basis, six (13%) individuals with subendocardial infarcts visible by CMR had no evidence of infarction by SPECT.SPECT and CMR detect transmural myocardial infarcts at similar rates. However, CMR systematically detects subendocardial infarcts that are missed by SPECT.

ObjectivesWe sought to ascertain whether myocardial scarring occurs in living unselected patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).BackgroundMyocardial scarring is known to occur in select HCM patients, who were highly symptomatic prior to death or who died suddenly. The majority of HCM patients, however, are minimally symptomatic and have not suffered sudden death.MethodsCine and gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 21 HCM patients who were predominantly asymptomatic. Gadolinium hyperenhancement was assumed to represent myocardial scar, and the extent of scar was compared to left ventricular (LV) morphology and function.ResultsScarring was present in 17 patients (81%). Scarring occurred only in hypertrophied regions (≥10 mm), was patchy with multiple foci, and predominantly involved the middle third of the ventricular wall. All 17 patients had scarring at the junction of the interventricular septum and the right ventricular (RV) free wall. On a regional basis, the extent of scarring correlated positively with wall thickness (r = 0.36, p < 0.0001), and inversely with wall thickening (r = −0.21, p < 0.0001). On a per patient basis, the extent of scarring (mean, 8 ± 9% of LV mass) was minimally related to maximum wall thickness (r = 0.40, p = 0.07) and LV mass (r = 0.33, p = 0.15), and correlated inversely with ejection fraction (r = −0.46, p = 0.04).ConclusionsMyocardial scarring is common in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic HCM patients who have not suffered sudden death. When present, scarring occurs in hypertrophied regions, is consistently localized to the junctions of the septum and RV free wall, and correlates positively with regional hypertrophy and inversely with regional contraction.

Limited data are available about the effects of adjunctive treadmill exercise on adverse effects and the image quality of adenosine perfusion imaging. This study compared the incidence of adverse effects and image quality between standard 6-minute adenosine perfusion imaging and a stress test incorporating a 4-minute adenosine infusion with low-level treadmill exercise.Nineteen patients underwent both a 6-minute adenosine technetium-99m sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging study and a 4-minute adenosine Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT study with 6 minutes of simultaneous low-level treadmill exercise. Symptoms were recorded at 1-minute intervals during the stress and recovery periods. Heart-to-liver and heart-to-lung count ratios were determined from anterior planar images. More adverse effects were experienced during the standard adenosine study than during the adenosine study with low-level exercise (2.7+/-1.4 vs. 1.4+/-1.1, P = .0003). The duration adverse effects were experienced was longer during the standard 6-minute adenosine protocol (6.6+/-2.1 minutes vs 3.2+/-2.8 minutes, P.0001). Additionally, the symptom-severity scores were higher with the standard adenosine study (15.5+/-9.8 vs 4.5+/-5.1, P.0001). The heart-to-liver ratios were noted to be higher in the 4-minute adenosine protocol with low-level exercise (1.0+/-0.3 vs. 0.6+/-0.2, P = .0003).In comparison with standard 6-minute adenosine perfusion imaging, a protocol incorporating a 4-minute adenosine infusion with low-level treadmill exercise results in a marked reduction in the quantity and severity of adverse effects and an improvement in image quality.

Limited exercise combined with dipyridamole increases myocardial perfusion defect severity compared with dipyridamole alone. The impact of limited exercise combined with adenosine on myocardial perfusion defect severity is unknown. This study compares myocardial perfusion defect severity with adenosine alone and adenosine combined with limited exercise. Thirty-two patients with coronary artery disease underwent on separate days and in randomized order technetium-99m sestamibi (25 to 30 mCi) single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging at rest, after adenosine (140 microg/kg/min x 6 minutes), and after adenosine (140 microg/kg/min x 4 minutes) during 6 minutes of modified Bruce treadmill exercise (adenosine-exercise). Radiopharmaceutical was injected at 3 and 5 minutes during adenosine and adenosine-exercise, respectively. Images were interpreted by a consensus agreement of 3 nuclear cardiologists without knowledge of patient identity, stress protocol, or clinical data using a 17-segment model and 5-point scoring system. A summed stress score (SSS), summed rest score (SRS), and summed difference (SSS-SRS) score (SDS) were calculated for each image. Peak stress heart rate and rate-pressure product were higher for adenosine-exercise than adenosine (102 +/- 19 vs 81 +/- 11 beats/min and 13,972 +/- 4,265 vs 10,623 +/- 2,131, respectively; both p0.001). Sensitivity for detection ofor = 50% coronary stenosis was 75% and 72% for adenosine-exercise and adenosine, respectively (p = NS). There were no differences in SSS and SDS between adenosine-exercise and adenosine (8.2 +/- 5.9 vs 8.1 +/- 6.3 and 4.9 +/- 4.1 vs 5.2 +/- 4.6, respectively; both p = NS). Thus, in patients with coronary artery disease, limited treadmill exercise combined with adenosine does not increase myocardial perfusion defect severity compared with standard adenosine technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging.

Background— In patients with sarcoidosis, sudden death is a leading cause of mortality, which may represent unrecognized cardiac involvement. Delayed-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance (DE-CMR) can detect minute amounts of myocardial damage. We sought to compare DE-CMR with standard clinical evaluation for the identification of cardiac involvement. Methods and Results— Eighty-one consecutive patients with biopsy-proven extracardiac sarcoidosis were prospectively recruited for a parallel and masked comparison of cardiac involvement between (1) DE-CMR and (2) standard clinical evaluation with the use of consensus criteria (modified Japanese Ministry of Health [JMH] guidelines). Standard evaluation included 12-lead ECG and at least 1 dedicated non-CMR cardiac study (echocardiography, radionuclide scintigraphy, or cardiac catheterization). Patients were followed for 21±8 months for major adverse events (death, defibrillator shock, or pacemaker requirement). Patients were predominantly middle-aged (46±11 years), female (62%), and black (73%) and had chronic sarcoidosis (median, 7 years) and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (median, 56%). DE-CMR identified cardiac involvement in 21 patients (26%) and JMH criteria in 10 (12%, 8 overlapping), a >2-fold higher rate for DE-CMR ( P =0.005). All patients with myocardial damage on DE-CMR had coronary disease excluded by x-ray angiography. Pathology evaluation in 15 patients (19%) identified 4 with cardiac sarcoidosis; all 4 were positive by DE-CMR, whereas 2 were JMH positive. On follow-up, 8 had adverse events, including 5 cardiac deaths. Patients with myocardial damage on DE-CMR had a 9-fold higher rate of adverse events and an 11.5-fold higher rate of cardiac death than patients without damage. Conclusions— In patients with sarcoidosis, DE-CMR is more than twice as sensitive for cardiac involvement as current consensus criteria. Myocardial damage detected by DE-CMR appears to be associated with future adverse events including cardiac death, but events were few, and this needs confirmation in a larger cohort.

To retrospectively determine the safety of cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging performed early (14 days) after coronary stent implantation in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).This HIPPA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board; the informed consent requirement was waived. Consecutive patients with AMI who underwent cardiac MR imaging (study group) shortly after stent implantation (median, 3 days) were compared with control subjects who did not undergo MR imaging and were matched for clinical factors and angiographic extent of coronary disease. A 1.5-T MR imager was used to evaluate cine function, perfusion, and viability. Rates of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or revascularization 30 days and 6 months after stent implantation were compared with chi(2) analysis.The study group consisted of 66 patients (median age, 56 years; 17 women) with 97 stents, 38 (39%) of which were drug eluting. The control group included 124 patients (median age, 58 years; 23% women) with 197 stents, 21 (10.7%) of which were drug eluting. There was no significant (P = .13) difference in the combined end point of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or revascularization between the study (2.0% [95% confidence interval: 0.0%, 4.5%]) and control (6.5% [95% confidence interval: 1.6%, 11.3%]) groups at 30-day follow-up. The event-free survival rate at 6-month follow-up was 91% in the study group and 83.7% in the control group (P = .18). Considering the end points separately, there was no difference in the event rate at 30-day or 6-month follow-up between groups. No adverse cardiovascular events occurred in patients with drug-eluting stents who underwent MR imaging.Cardiac MR imaging performed shortly after AMI and percutaneous revascularization with bare metal or drug-eluting stents appears safe. The risk of adverse cardiovascular events is low and similar to that in patients who do not undergo MR imaging.

Delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging is a viability imaging technique that has been demonstrated in both animal and patient studies to accurately identify and characterize the presence and transmural extent of myocardial scarring. The precise information regarding the presence, location and extent of myocardial scarring has been shown to be useful in predicting the likelihood of functional recovery of dysfunctional myocardium after revascularization. Perhaps, more importantly, the ability to visualize the extent of viable and nonviable myocardium across the ventricular wall allows one to approach viability as a continuum rather than in a binary manner, providing a better reflection of the underlying physiology.

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is the leading cause of end stage renal disease (ESRD) in the Western world, responsible for more than 44% of new ESRD cases in the United States.1 Type 2 diabetes is currently responsible for the large majority of diabetic ESRD patients.2 Among patients with type 1 diabetes, 25% to 35% ultimately develop severe DN and a similar risk is found by long-term survivors of type 2 diabetes.2 Despite the beneficial effects of antihypertensive agents, in slowing the rate of progression of overt diabetic nephropathy,3–5 the number of diabetic patients requiring renal replacement therapy is substantially and continuously increasing.1 Thus, any therapeutic intervention able to reduce the risk of ESRD in diabetes can provide benefits in terms of mortality, morbidity, quality of life of patients, and healthcare costs.

Failure to achieve an adequate heart rate limits the sensitivity of exercise myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) for the detection of coronary artery disease. In addition, it is often not possible to discontinue medications that may blunt the heart rate response to exercise, because of conditions such as hypertension or angina. However, if pharmacologic stress testing is performed, the ability to assess functional capacity is lost. Accordingly, we developed a protocol that incorporates adenosine stress with symptom-limited exercise.As part of a multicenter study, 35 patients were enrolled prospectively and underwent both exercise MPI and exercise MPI with a 4-minute adenosine infusion on a separate day. Technetium 99m sestamibi was injected at or near peak exercise (exercise only) and at 2 minutes into the adenosine infusion (combined exercise and adenosine). The perfusion images were interpreted in a blinded fashion. The combined adenosine and exercise protocol was well tolerated. The summed stress scores and summed difference scores were greater in the exercise-plus-adenosine group than in the exercise-only group (10.0 vs 8.5, P =.02, and 4.9 vs 3.3, P =.002, respectively). Exercise time was slightly but significantly less with the exercise-plus-adenosine protocol (8 minutes 46 seconds vs 8 minutes 11 seconds, P =.027).A protocol combining 4 minutes of adenosine infusion with symptom-limited exercise was safe and well tolerated. Furthermore, this protocol resulted in a greater amount of myocardial ischemia detected on MPI while allowing for the assessment of functional capacity. A combined exercise and adenosine protocol may be a useful test for patients undergoing MPI who are unlikely to achieve an adequate chronotropic response.

Background— The reproducibility of contrast-enhanced MRI has not been established. We compared MRI reproducibility for infarct size determination with that of 99m Tc-sestamibi (MIBI) single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Methods and Results— Patients with chronic myocardial infarction defined by enzymes (peak creatine kinase-MB 173±119 U/L) were scanned twice by MRI (MRI I and MRI II, n=20) and twice by SPECT (SPECT I and SPECT II, n=15) on the same day. The MRI contrast agent was injected during MRI I but not MRI II to test the effect of imaging time after contrast. Resting Tc-MIBI SPECT images were acquired and infarct size was determined with commercial software. Infarct size in patients scanned by MRI and SPECT was 14±6% of left ventricular mass (%LV) by MRI (range 4%LV to 27%LV) and 14±7%LV by SPECT (range 4%LV to 26%LV). MRI I and II scans were performed 10±2 and 27±3 minutes after contrast, respectively. For MRI, the difference in infarct size between scans I and II (bias) was −0.1%LV, and the coefficient of repeatability was ±2.4%LV. For SPECT, bias was −1.3%LV, and the coefficient of repeatability was ±4.0%LV. Within individual patients, no systematic differences in infarct size were detected when the 2 MRI scans were compared, the 2 SPECT scans were compared, or MRI was compared to SPECT. Conclusion— The size of healed infarcts measured by contrast-enhanced MRI does not change between 10 and 30 minutes after contrast. The clinical reproducibility of contrast-enhanced MRI for infarct size determination compares favorably with that of routine clinical SPECT.

Background. During the past few years the use of new immunosuppressants and refinements in surgical technique of simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation have resulted in markedly improved outcomes. This is a retrospective study of 208 SPK transplants performed at Northwestern University, demonstrating the advances made at a single center that are reflective of the field at large. Methods. An 8.5-year time span was split into 4 distinct eras marking sequential changes in immunosuppression and surgical technique that ensued. SPK transplant outcomes of patient and graft survival and rejection rates were compared. Also examined were end points related to the changing risk profile of the recipients, as well as quality of allograft function and rates of rehospitalizations. Results. Recipients receiving tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppression had patient, kidney, and pancreas survival rates significantly higher than those of earlier cohorts. The elimination of corticosteroids did not reduce survival rates or increase rejection risk. The use of pancreatic exocrine enteric drainage technique over bladder drainage reduced rehospitalizations. Conclusions. Advances in immunosuppression management combined with technical refinements have made SPK transplantation a safer and more effective treatment option for the diabetic, uremic patient. (Surgery 2002;132:545-54.)

Background Hypertension persists in many patients with diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation. However, the impact of control of diabetes as well as kidney failure on hypertension by combined kidney and pancreas transplantation has not been studied. Methods and Results Between March 1993 and August 1998, 111 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus underwent successful pancreas transplantation (108 kidney/pancreas transplantation) and another 28 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus underwent isolated kidney transplantation. Blood pressure measurements and all antihypertensive medications were determined for both groups before transplantation and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and at the most recent outpatient evaluation after transplantation. At baseline, the mean blood pressure was 151/88 and 151/83 mm Hg for the kidney/pancreas and isolated kidney transplant patients, respectively. The mean blood pressure decreased to 134/77 mm Hg 1 month after kidney/pancreas transplantation ( P P P Conclusions Successful kidney/pancreas transplantation results in a marked improvement in hypertension treatment that is not observed in patients undergoing isolated kidney transplantation. These data underscore the importance of diabetes in the pathogenesis of hypertension in patients with diabetes and kidney failure.

Background. In the past, enteric drainage or the omission of induction immunotherapy has been shown to be predictive of suboptimal outcomes of simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation. We have reassessed the need for bladder drainage and induction immunotherapy to optimize the outcome of SPK transplantation. Methods. One hundred consecutive recipients of SPK transplants who received mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus immunosuppression were studied. The first 50 recipients had bladder-drained pancreas allografts and received induction immunotherapy. The results were compared with the next 50 recipients who had enteric-drained pancreas allografts, which included a subgroup (n = 17 patients) who were randomized to receive no induction immunotherapy. Results. The 1-year actuarial patient, kidney, and pancreas survival rates in the bladder-drainage group were 98.0%, 94.0%, and 94.0%, respectively. The 1-year actuarial patient, kidney, and pancreas survival rates in the enteric-drainage group were 96.8%, 96.8%, and 89.4%, respectively. In the enteric-drainage group, the incidence of rejection at 1 year was 6.1% in recipients who received induction therapy versus 23.5% in recipients who did not receive induction therapy. The average number of readmissions per recipient was 1.8 in the bladder-drainage group versus 0.9 in the enteric-drainage group. Conclusions. Primary enteric drainage of the pancreas allograft in recipients of SPK transplantation is the preferred surgical technique in the tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil era. (Surgery 2000;128:726-37.)