Search

As part of a phase 1/2 study, this single-arm expansion cohort established the efficacy and safety of mosunetuzumab monotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (received >=2 prior lines of therapy). Intravenous mosunetuzumab was administered with cycle (C)1 step-up dosing for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) mitigation: C1 day (D) 1: 1 mg; C1D8 2 mg; C1D15 and C2D1: 60 mg; C3 + D1: 30 mg. Hospitalization was not mandatory. Patients with complete response (CR) completed treatment after C8; those with partial response or stable disease continued treatment for a total of 17 cycles. The primary endpoint was CR rate (best response) by Independent Review Facility, assessed against a historical control CR rate (20%). Eighty-eight patients (73.9% de-novo DLBCL; 26.1% transformed follicular lymphoma) were enrolled; all had received prior anthracycline and anti-CD20 therapy. Overall response and CR rates were 42.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.6-53.1) and 23.9% (95% CI, 15.4-34.1, respectively; CR rate did not reach statistical significance versus the historical control [P = 0.36]). Median time to first response was 1.4 months. Median progression-free survival was 3.2 months (95% CI: 2.2, 5.3). The CR rate in 26 patients who received prior CAR-T therapy was 12%. CRS was one of the most common adverse events (26.1% of patients); predominantly grade 1 to 2 and primarily in C1. Four patients (4.5%) discontinued mosunetuzumab due to adverse events. Mosunetuzumab demonstrated notable efficacy and a manageable safety profile in patients with R/R DLBCL, including those previously treated with CAR-Ts.

There is limited understanding of how signaling pathways are altered by oncogenic fusion transcription factors that drive leukemogenesis. To address this, we interrogated activated signaling pathways in a comparative analysis of mouse and human leukemias expressing the fusion protein E2A-PBX1, which is present in 5%–7% of pediatric and 50% of pre-B-cell receptor (preBCR+) acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL). In this study, we describe remodeling of signaling networks by E2A-PBX1 in pre-B-ALL, which results in hyperactivation of the key oncogenic effector enzyme PLCγ2. Depletion of PLCγ2 reduced proliferation of mouse and human ALLs, including E2A-PBX1 leukemias, and increased disease-free survival after secondary transplantation. Mechanistically, E2A-PBX1 bound promoter regulatory regions and activated the transcription of its key target genes ZAP70, SYK, and LCK, which encode kinases upstream of PLCγ2. Depletion of the respective upstream kinases decreased cell proliferation and phosphorylated levels of PLCγ2 (pPLCγ2). Pairwise silencing of ZAP70, SYK, or LCK showed additive effects on cell growth inhibition, providing a rationale for combination therapy with inhibitors of these kinases. Accordingly, inhibitors such as the SRC family kinase (SFK) inhibitor dasatinib reduced pPLCγ2 and inhibited proliferation of human and mouse preBCR+/E2A-PBX1+ leukemias in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, combining small-molecule inhibition of SYK, LCK, and SFK showed synergistic interactions and preclinical efficacy in the same setting. Our results show how the oncogenic fusion protein E2A-PBX1 perturbs signaling pathways upstream of PLCγ2 and renders leukemias amenable to targeted therapeutic inhibition. Cancer Res; 76(23); 6937–49. ©2016 AACR.

Supplementary Methods

Study disposition

Participant PIK3CA-mutation central testing results

Supplementary data provide further supportive evidence that E2A-PBX1 binds the regulatory regions of its target genes (Supplementary Figure 1), which are expressed in primary ALLs depending on karyotype (Supplementary Figure 2), and have oncogenic roles in a mouse model of E2A-PX1 leukemia (Supplementary Figure 3) dependent on their genetic interactions to support proliferation and survival (Supplemental Figure 4). Additional supportive data demonstrate that genetic depletion of target gene expression enhances small molecule effects targeting the respective kinases (Supplemental Figure 5), which provides further rationale for combination kinase targeted therapy in E2A-PBX1+ ALL (Supplemental Figure 6)

Supplementary Tables

Supplementary Figures

Purpose: This single-arm, open-label phase II study evaluated the safety and efficacy of taselisib (GDC-0032) plus fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with locally advanced or metastatic HER2-negative, hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer.Patients and Methods: Patients received 6-mg oral taselisib capsules daily plus intramuscular fulvestrant (500 mg) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Tumor tissue (if available) was centrally evaluated for PIK3CA mutations. Adverse events (AE) were recorded using NCI-CTCAE v4.0. Tumor response was investigator-determined using RECIST v1.1.Results: Median treatment duration was 4.6 (range: 0.9–40.5) months. All patients experienced ≥1 AE, 30 (50.0%) had grade ≥3 AEs, and 19 (31.7%) experienced 35 serious AEs. Forty-seven of 60 patients had evaluable tissue for central PIK3CA mutation testing [20 had mutations, 27 had no mutation detected (MND)]. In patients with baseline measurable disease, clinical activity was observed in tumors with PIK3CA mutations [best confirmed response rate: 38.5% (5/13; 95% CI, 13.9–68.4); clinical benefit rate (CBR): 38.5% (5/13; 95% CI, 13.9–68.4)], PIK3CA-MND [best confirmed response rate: 14.3% (3/21; 95% CI, 3.0–36.3); CBR: 23.8% (5/21; 95% CI, 8.2–47.2)], and unknown PIK3CA mutation status [best confirmed response rate: 20.0% (2/10; 95% CI, 2.5–55.6); CBR: 30.0% (3/10; 95% CI, 6.7–65.2)].Conclusions: Taselisib plus fulvestrant had clinical activity irrespective of PIK3CA mutation status, with numerically higher objective response rate and CBR in patients with PIK3CA-mutated (vs. -MND) locally advanced or metastatic HER2-negative, HR-positive breast cancer. No new safety signals were reported. A confirmatory phase III trial is ongoing. Clin Cancer Res; 24(18); 4380–7. ©2018 AACR.

Dasatinib is a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for treatment of Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), but its efficacy is limited by resistance. Recent preclinical studies suggest that dasatinib may be a candidate therapy in additional ALL subtypes including pre-BCR+ ALL. Here we utilized shRNA library screening and global transcriptomic analysis to identify several novel genes and pathways that may enhance dasatinib efficacy or mitigate potential resistance in human pre-BCR+ ALL. Depletion of the transcriptional coactivator CBP increased dasatinib sensitivity by downregulating transcription of the pre-BCR signaling pathway previously associated with dasatinib sensitivity. Acquired resistance was due, in part, to upregulation of alternative pathways including WNT through a mechanism, suggesting transcriptional plasticity. Small molecules that disrupt CBP interactions with the CREB KID domain or β-catenin showed promising preclinical efficacy in combination with dasatinib. These findings highlight novel modulators of sensitivity to targeted therapies in human pre-BCR+ ALL, which can be reversed by small-molecule inhibitors. They also identify promising therapeutic approaches to ameliorate dasatinib sensitivity and prevent resistance in ALL.Significance: These findings reveal mechanisms that modulate sensitivity to dasatinib and suggest therapeutic strategies to improve the outcome of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Graphical Abstract: http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/canres/78/22/6497/F1.large.jpg. Cancer Res; 78(22); 6497–508. ©2018 AACR.

Unbiased shRNA library screening and global transcriptome analyses reveal mechanisms that modulate dasatinib sensitivity and suggest therapeutic strategies to improve outcome of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Definition of adverse events of special interest (AESI)

PURPOSE Mosunetuzumab is a bispecific antibody targeting CD20 and CD3 that redirects T cells to engage and eliminate malignant B cells and is being developed for relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (B-NHLs). METHODS This first-in-human trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02500407 ) evaluated the safety and tolerability and efficacy of mosunetuzumab in patients with R/R B-NHL and established the recommended phase II dose. Data from dose escalation are presented. Single-agent mosunetuzumab was administered intravenously in 3-week cycles, at full dose in cycle 1 day 1 (group A) or with ascending (step-up) doses during cycle 1 on days 1, 8, and 15 (group B), for eight or 17 cycles on the basis of tumor response. RESULTS Two hundred thirty patients were enrolled. Doses up to 2.8 mg and 60 mg were assessed in groups A and B, respectively; maximum tolerated dose was not exceeded. In group B (n = 197), common adverse events (≥ 20% of patients) were neutropenia (28.4%), cytokine release syndrome (27.4%), hypophosphatemia (23.4%), fatigue (22.8%), and diarrhea (21.8%). Cytokine release syndrome was mostly low-grade (grade ≥ 3: 1.0%) and mainly confined to cycle 1. Across the doses investigated (group B), best overall response rates were 34.9% and 66.2% in patients with aggressive and indolent B-NHL, respectively, and complete response rates were 19.4% and 48.5%. Among patients with a complete response, the median duration of response was 22.8 months (95% CI, 7.6 to not estimable) and 20.4 (95% CI, 16 to not estimable) in patients with aggressive and indolent B-NHL, respectively. CONCLUSION Mosunetuzumab, administered with step-up dosing, has a manageable safety profile and induces durable complete responses in R/R B-NHL. The expansion stage of the study is ongoing at the dose level of 1/2/60/60/30 mg selected for further study.

Purpose:Somatic mutations in phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA), which encodes the p110α catalytic subunit of PI3K, are found in multiple human cancers. While recurrent mutations in PIK3CA helical, regulatory, and kinase domains lead to constitutive PI3K pathway activation, other mutations remain uncharacterized. To further evaluate their clinical actionability, we designed a basket study for patients with PIK3CA-mutant cancers with the isoform-specific PI3K inhibitor taselisib.Patients and Methods:Patients were enrolled on the basis of local PIK3CA mutation testing into one of 11 histology-specific cohorts and treated with taselisib at 6 or 4 mg daily until progression. Tumor DNA from baseline and progression (when available) was sequenced using a next-generation sequencing panel. Exploratory analyses correlating genomic alterations with treatment outcomes were performed.Results:A total of 166 patients with PIK3CA-mutant cancers were enrolled. The confirmed response rate was 9%. Activity varied by tumor type and mutant allele, with confirmed responses observed in head and neck squamous (15.4%), cervical (10%), and other cancers, plus in tumors containing helical domain mutations. Genomic analyses identified mutations potentially associated with resistance to PI3K inhibition upfront (TP53 and PTEN) and postprogression through reactivation of the PI3K pathway (PTEN, STK11, and PIK3R1). Higher rates of dose modification occurred at higher doses of taselisib, indicating a narrow therapeutic index.Conclusions:Taselisib had limited activity in the tumor types tested and is no longer in development. This genome-driven study improves understanding of the activity, limitations, and resistance mechanisms of using PI3K inhibitors as monotherapy to target PIK3CA-mutant tumors.

Mosunetuzumab is a CD20 × CD3 T-cell-engaging bispecific monoclonal antibody that redirects T cells to eliminate malignant B cells. In a phase 1 study, mosunetuzumab was well tolerated and active in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphoma. We, therefore, aimed to evaluate the safety and anti-tumour activity of fixed-duration mosunetuzumab in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma who had received two or more previous therapies.We conducted a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 study at 49 centres in seven countries (Australia, Canada, Germany, South Korea, Spain, UK, and USA). All patients were aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed follicular lymphoma (grade 1-3a) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1. Patients had disease that was relapsed or refractory to two or more previous lines of treatment, including an anti-CD20 therapy and an alkylating agent. Intravenous mosunetuzumab was administered in 21-day cycles with cycle 1 step-up dosing: 1 mg on cycle 1 day 1, 2 mg on cycle 1 day 8, 60 mg on cycle 1 day 15 and cycle 2 day 1, and 30 mg on day 1 of cycle 3 and onwards. Patients with a complete response by investigator assessment using the International Harmonisation Project criteria completed treatment after cycle 8, whereas patients with a partial response or stable disease continued treatment for up to 17 cycles. The primary endpoint was independent review committee-assessed complete response rate (as best response) in all enrolled patients; the primary efficacy analysis compared the observed IRC-assessed complete response rate with a 14% historical control complete response rate in a similar patient population receiving the pan class I PI3K inhibitor copanlisib. Safety was assessed in all enrolled patients. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02500407, and is ongoing.Between May 2, 2019, and Sept 25, 2020, we enrolled 90 patients. As of the data cutoff date (Aug 27, 2021), the median follow-up was 18·3 months (IQR 13·8-23·3). According to independent review committee assessment, a complete response was recorded in 54 patients (60·0% [95% CI 49·1-70·2]). The observed complete response rate was significantly higher than the historical control complete response rate with copanlisib of 14% (p0·0001), thereby meeting the primary study endpoint. Cytokine release syndrome was the most common adverse event (40 [44%] of 90 patients) and was predominantly grade 1 (23 [26%] of 90) and grade 2 (15 [17%]), and primarily confined to cycle 1. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia or neutrophil count decreased (24 [27%] of 90 patients), hypophosphataemia (15 [17%]), hyperglycaemia (seven [8%]), and anaemia (seven [8%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 42 (47%) of 90 patients. No treatment-related grade 5 (ie, fatal) adverse event occurred.Fixed-duration mosunetuzumab has a favourable safety profile and induces high rates of complete remissions, allowing potential administration as an outpatient regimen, in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma and two or more previous therapies.F Hoffmann-La Roche and Genentech.

Chromosomal rearrangements involving the mixed lineage leukemia (MLL) gene, also known as KMT2A, are often observed in human leukemias and are generally associated with a poor prognosis. To model these leukemias, we applied clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9 gene editing to induce MLL chromosomal rearrangements in human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells purified from umbilical cord blood. Electroporation of ribonucleoprotein complexes containing chemically modified synthetic single guide RNAs and purified Cas9 protein induced translocations between chromosomes 9 and 11 [t(9;11)] at an efficiency >1%. Transplantation of gene-edited cells into immune-compromised mice rapidly induced acute leukemias of different lineages and often with multiclonal origins dictated by the duration of in vitro culture prior to transplantation. Breakpoint junction sequences served as biomarkers to monitor clonal selection and progression in culture and in vivo. High-dimensional cell surface and intracellular protein analysis by mass cytometry (CyTOF) revealed that gene-edited leukemias recapitulated disease-specific protein expression observed in human patients and showed that MLL-rearranged (MLLr) mixed phenotype acute leukemias (MPALs) were more similar to acute myeloid leukemias (AMLs) than to acute lymphoblastic leukemias (ALLs). Therefore, highly efficient generation of MLL chromosomal translocations in primary human blood stem cells using CRISPR/Cas9 reliably models human acute MLLr leukemia and provides an experimental platform for basic and translational studies of leukemia biology and therapeutics.

Novel therapies for relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma are commonly evaluated in single-arm studies without formal comparison with other treatments or historical controls. Consequently, rigorously defined treatment outcomes informing expectations for novel therapeutic strategies in this population are sparse. To inform outcome expectations, we aimed to describe treatment patterns, survival outcomes, and duration of response in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma receiving three or more lines of systemic therapy.In this multicentre cohort study, we developed a database of patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma from eight academic centres in the USA using data collected in the LEO Cohort study (NCT02736357) and the LEO Consortium. For this analysis, eligible patients were aged at least 18 years, had non-transformed grade 1-3a follicular lymphoma, and were receiving systemic therapy in the third line or later after previous therapy with an anti-CD20 antibody and an alkylating agent. Clinical data and patient outcomes were abstracted from medical records by use of a standard protocol. The index therapy for the primary analysis was defined as the first line of systemic therapy after the patient had received at least two previous systemic therapies that included an alkylating agent and an anti-CD20 therapy. The main endpoints of interest were overall response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Outcomes were also evaluated in subsets of clinical interest (index therapy characteristics, patient and disease characteristics, treatment history, and best response assessment).We screened 933 patients with follicular lymphoma, of whom 441 were included and diagnosed between March 6, 2002, and July 20, 2018. Index therapies included immunochemotherapy (n=133), anti-CD20 antibody monotherapy (n=53), lenalidomide with or without anti-CD20 (n=37), and phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors with or without anti-CD20 (n=25). 57 (13%) of 441 patients received haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation and 98 (23%) of 421 patients with complete data received therapy on clinical trials. After a median follow-up of 71 months (IQR 64-79) from index therapy, 5-year overall survival was 75% (95% CI 70-79), median progression-free survival was 17 months (15-19), and the overall response rate was 70% (65-74; 280 of 400 patients evaluable for response). Patients who were refractory to therapy with an alkylating agent had a lower overall response rate (170 [68%] of 251 patients vs 107 [77%] of 139 patients) and a significantly lower 5-year overall survival (72%, 95% CI 66-78 vs 81%, 73-89; hazard ratio 1·60, 95% CI 1·04-2·46) than patients who were not refractory to therapy with an alkylating agent.Patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma receive heterogeneous treatments in the third-line setting or later. We observed high response rates to contemporary therapies that were of short duration. These data identify unmet needs among patients with follicular lymphoma, especially those who are refractory to alkylating agents, and might provide evidence by which clinical trials evaluating novel treatments could be assessed.Genentech and the National Cancer Institute.

Sarit Assouline and Won Seog Kim contributed equally. Introduction: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is considered an indolent yet incurable disease characterized by recurrent relapses: disease-free intervals shorten, and refractoriness increases with each relapse. Patients (pts) with FL who have received at least two prior systemic therapies typically have a poor prognosis. This is particularly true for those who have progression of disease within 24 months of front-line treatment (POD24), or are refractory to multiple agent classes; such patients are left with limited treatment options. Mosunetuzumab is a full-length, fully humanized immunoglobulin G1 CD20/CD3 bispecific antibody that redirects T cells to engage and eliminate malignant B cells. GO29781 (NCT02500407) is an ongoing open-label, multicenter, Phase I/Ib, dose-escalation and expansion study evaluating the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of mosunetuzumab in pts with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell lymphoma. Here, we present updated clinical data from pts with R/R FL treated with mosunetuzumab after at least two prior systemic therapies. Methods: Data are presented from Group B, in which pts received intravenous mosunetuzumab monotherapy as step-up doses in Cycle 1 on Days 1 and 8 and the target dose administered on Day 15. Mosunetuzumab was given on Day 1 of each subsequent 21-day cycle for 8 cycles in pts with a complete response (CR), and up to 17 cycles in those with a partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD). Results: As of January 21, 2020, 62 pts with FL (with at least two prior systemic therapies), received mosunetuzumab at dose levels between 0.4/1.0/2.8mg and 1/2/13.5mg (Cycle 1 Day 1/8/15 dose levels). The median age was 59 (range 27-85) years, and median number of prior therapies was 3 (range 2-11). Thirty-three pts (53%) were refractory to both a prior anti-CD20 antibody and an alkylating agent (double refractory), 30 (48%) had POD24, and four (6%) had received prior chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy. The overall response rate (ORR) was 68% (42/62), with 31 pts (50%) achieving CR (Figure). Consistent CR rates were observed in high-risk pt populations, including those with double refractory disease (18/33 [55%]), POD24 (16/30 [53%]), PI3Ki refractory (7/9 [78%]), and those who received prior CAR-T therapy (2/4 [50%]). With a median time on study of 14.4 months, 26 pts (62% of all responders; including 74% of pts who achieved CR) remained in remission at the data cut-off. The median duration of response (DOR) was 20.4 months (95% CI: 11.7 months, upper limit not reached) for all 42 responders. The median PFS was 11.8 months (95% CI: 7.3-21.9 months). Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 60 pts (97%); serious adverse events (SAE) were reported in 22 pts (35%). The most frequently reported (>10% of pts) grade (Gr) 3 or higher AEs included hypophosphatemia (23%; transient and clinically asymptomatic) and neutropenia (21%; with a low rate of febrile neutropenia [2%]). Overall, 14 pts (23%) experienced CRS; in four pts, CRS was classified as a SAE. CRS events were reversible, mostly of Gr 1 or 2 (Gr 1, n=11; Gr 2, n=2; Gr 3, n=1; Lee, et al. Blood 2014), and predominantly occurred during Cycle 1. No patient required tocilizumab, intensive care unit admission or use of vasopressors for CRS management. Neurologic AEs (NAEs; defined by any AEs reported as Preferred Terms in SOC Nervous System Disorders and SOC Psychiatric Disorders) were observed in 28 pts (45%); all were Gr 1 (n=18) or 2 (n=10). The most commonly reported NAEs were headache (24%), insomnia (15%) and dizziness (11%). No Gr ≥3 NAEs or serious NAEs were reported. Conclusions: Fixed-duration mosunetuzumab monotherapy results in high response rates and durable disease control with a tolerable safety profile in heavily pretreated patients with FL, including known high-risk subgroups. Updated pharmacodynamics and biomarker data will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Assouline: BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Kim:Mundipharma: Research Funding; Donga: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirn: Research Funding; Celltrion: Research Funding; JJ: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding. Sehn:Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Teva: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; Chugai: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Apobiologix: Consultancy, Honoraria; Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Lundbeck: Consultancy, Honoraria; TG therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Verastem Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; MorphoSys: Consultancy, Honoraria. Schuster:AlloGene, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Genentech, Inc./ F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Juno/Celgene, Loxo Oncology, Nordic Nanovector, Novartis, Tessa Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis, Genentech, Inc./ F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding. Cheah:Celgene, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Abbvie, MSD: Research Funding; Celgene, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, MSD, Janssen, Gilead, Ascentage Pharma, Acerta, Loxo Oncology, TG therapeutics: Honoraria. Nastoupil:Karus Therapeutics: Research Funding; Gilead/KITE: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Shadman:Fred Hutchinson / University of Washington: Current Employment; Abbvie, Genentech, Inc., AstraZeneca, Sound Biologics , Pharmacyclics, Verastem, ADC therapeutics, Beigene, Cellectar, BMS, Mophosys and Atara Biotherapeutics: Consultancy; Mustang Bio, Celgene, Pharmacyclics, Gilead, Genentech, Inc., Abbvie, TG therapeutics, Beigene, AstraZeneca, Sunesis: Research Funding. Yoon:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kyowahako Kirin: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Other: All authors received support for third-party writing assistance, furnished by Scott Battle, PhD, provided by F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland., Research Funding; YuhanPharma: Research Funding. Matasar:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; IGM Biosciences: Research Funding; Immunovaccine Technologies: Honoraria, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Teva: Consultancy; Rocket Medical: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Diefenbach:Trillium: Research Funding; Millenium/Takeda: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; MEI: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Denovo: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Gregory:Janssen: Consultancy; F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Genentech, Inc., MSD, AbbVie, BeiGene, AstraZeneca, Celgene, BMS: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Novartis, AbbVie: Speakers Bureau; F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Novartis, Sandoz, Gilead, AbbVie, MSD: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Novartis, Sandoz, Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bartlett:BMS/Celgene: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Affimed Therapeutics: Research Funding; Autolus: Research Funding; Acerta: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BTG: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Forty Seven: Research Funding. Wei:Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Doral:Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Yin:Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Negricea:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current Employment. Li:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment. Penuel:Genentech, Inc./ F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current Employment; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Huang:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current Employment. Budde:AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; Merck, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Mustang Therapeutics: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Kite Pharma: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Mosunetuzumab (RG7828) is a full-length, fully humanized immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) bispecific antibody targeting both CD3 (on the surface of T cells) and CD20 (on the surface of B cells). Mosunetuzumab redirects T cells to engage and eliminate malignant B cells. Mosunetuzumab is an investigational agent.

TPS7588 Background: Despite significant progress with first-line immunochemotherapy, most patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) will eventually relapse with increasing refractoriness and decreasing duration of response to subsequent therapy lines (Rivas-Delgado et al. 2019). Mosunetuzumab (M) is a CD20xCD3 bispecific antibody that engages and redirects T-cells to eliminate malignant B cells (Sun et al. 2015). In an ongoing, pivotal Phase I/II trial of M monotherapy, patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) FL who have received ≥2 prior treatment lines achieve deep and durable responses (NCT02500407; Budde et al. ASH 2021). Preliminary data from a Phase Ib study have suggested favorable safety and promising activity of M in combination with lenalidomide (Len), a potent immunomodulatory agent that has shown additive/synergistic activity with an anti-CD20 antibody in R/R indolent lymphoma (Leonard et al. 2019), in patients with R/R FL who have received ≥1 prior therapy (NCT04246086; Morschhauser et al. ASH 2021). The chemotherapy-free M-Len combination may represent a promising outpatient therapy option for future management of patients with R/R FL. The randomized, multicenter Phase III study has been initiated. Methods: CELESTIMO (NCT04712097) is a randomized, multicenter, open-label Phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of M-Len versus rituximab plus Len (R-Len) in patients with previously treated R/R FL. Patients must have histologically documented CD20+ FL (Grades 1–3a) requiring systemic therapy and have received ≥1 prior line of systemic therapy. Patients are randomized (1:1) to receive M-Len (M intravenously [IV] on Days [D] 1, 8 and 15 of Cycle [C] 1 [21-day cycle] and D1 of C2–12 [28-day cycles], plus Len orally [PO] on D1–21 of C2–12) or R-Len (R IV on D1, 8, 15 and 22 of C1 then on D1 of C3, 5, 7, 9, and 11, plus Len PO on D1–21 of C1–12 [all 28-day cycles]), and stratified by disease progression within 24 months of initial treatment (yes/no), number of prior lines of therapy (1 versus ≥2), and refractoriness to anti-CD20 therapy (refractory/non-refractory). The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by independent review committee; secondary endpoints include investigator-assessed PFS, complete and objective response, overall survival, and safety. Biomarkers predictive of response to M-Len and R-Len will also be investigated as exploratory endpoints. The study started recruitment in 2021 and plans to enroll ̃400 patients from approximately 16 countries and 150 sites globally. Clinical trial information: NCT04712097.

7526 Background: Mosunetuzumab (M) is a bispecific antibody targeting CD20 and CD3 that redirects T cells to engage and eliminate malignant B cells being developed for relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (B-NHL). CD20 is an optimal target, with uniform expression across B-NHL histologies and minimal receptor turnover. We characterized CD20 loss as a potential mechanism of resistance to M in patients (pts) on a Phase I/II trial (NCT02500407) receiving M monotherapy for the treatment (tx) of R/R B-NHL. Methods: Pts with R/R B-NHL received M intravenously in 3-week cycles, for eight to 17 cycles depending on tumor response. At baseline (BL), biomarker-evaluable (archival or fresh) biopsies were collected from 293 pts. Biopsies from 62 pts were collected at additional time points during tx with M and/or at disease progression (PD). The proportion of CD20+ and PAX5+ tumor cells was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using dual-staining with anti-CD20 (clone L26, VENTANA) and anti-PAX5 (clone DAK-PAX5, DAKO) antibodies. Expression of MS4A1, the gene encoding CD20 , was measured by RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq); MS4A1 mutation profiling was performed by whole exome sequencing (WES). Levels of CD20 expression were assessed relative to response rates. Correlative analyses were performed and assessed centrally (IHC, RNA-seq, and WES) and locally (IHC). Results: CD20 levels were consistently high ( > 75% CD20+PAX5+ cells) in the majority of BL biopsies and generally comparable across histologies (FL, DLBCL, tFL, MCL, and RT). BL CD20 loss (≤5% CD20+PAX5+ cells) was seen in 16/293 pts (5.5%), more commonly in aggressive NHL, and responses to M were not seen in these pts. Among 62 pts with BL and on-tx/at-PD biopsies, BL CD20 levels were ≤5% in 7/62 pts (11%) (6/7 pts [86%] progressed before completing Cycle 2). CD20 levels were maintained in on-tx biopsies from 23/24 pts (96%). At PD, biopsies showed CD20 loss in 7/26 pts (27%). For five pts with BL, on-tx and at-PD biopsies, all pts maintained CD20 while on-tx and 1/5 pts (20%) had CD20 loss at PD. There was no clear association between CD20 reduction and histology. Data from 185 BL biopsies showed generally concordant levels of CD20 gene and protein expression (r = 0.72). In 10/185 pts (5%), MS4A1 was expressed without detectable CD20 protein expression; DNA sequencing revealed novel mutations in MS4A1, including mutations leading to truncation of the protein. CD20 transmembrane and extra-cellular domain mutations were also observed but do not block CD20 expression. Conclusions: In pts with R/R B-NHL treated with M, low BL CD20 expression is associated with lack of response to M. During M tx, loss of tumor cell expression of CD20 is one mechanism of acquired resistance; however, CD20 expression is maintained in most pts with PD, implying alternative mechanisms for acquired M resistance. Clinical trial information: NCT02500407.

Dasatinib is a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for treatment of Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), but its efficacy is limited by resistance. Recent preclinical studies suggest that dasatinib may be a candidate therapy in additional ALL subtypes including pre-BCR+ ALL. Here we utilized shRNA library screening and global transcriptomic analysis to identify several novel genes and pathways that may enhance dasatinib efficacy or mitigate potential resistance in human pre-BCR+ ALL. Depletion of the transcriptional coactivator CBP increased dasatinib sensitivity by downregulating transcription of the pre-BCR signaling pathway previously associated with dasatinib sensitivity. Acquired resistance was due, in part, to upregulation of alternative pathways including WNT through a mechanism, suggesting transcriptional plasticity. Small molecules that disrupt CBP interactions with the CREB KID domain or β-catenin showed promising preclinical efficacy in combination with dasatinib. These findings highlight novel modulators of sensitivity to targeted therapies in human pre-BCR+ ALL, which can be reversed by small-molecule inhibitors. They also identify promising therapeutic approaches to ameliorate dasatinib sensitivity and prevent resistance in ALL. Significance: These findings reveal mechanisms that modulate sensitivity to dasatinib and suggest therapeutic strategies to improve the outcome of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Graphical Abstract: http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/canres/78/22/6497/F1.large.jpg. Cancer Res; 78(22); 6497–508. ©2018 AACR.

Context Follicular lymphoma (FL) often presents with recurrent relapses. Treatment options for patients (pts) with FL who have received ≥2 prior lines of therapy are limited, and prognosis is poor. The safety and efficacy of mosunetuzumab, a full-length, fully humanized IgG1 CD20/CD3 bispecific antibody is currently being investigated in an ongoing open-label, multicenter, Phase I/Ib, dose-escalation and expansion trial in relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell lymphoma (GO29781; NCT02500407). Objective To present updated data from the R/R FL cohort. Methods Pts received intravenous mosunetuzumab step-up doses in cycle (C) 1, days (D) 1 and 8, then the target dose on D15 and D1 of each subsequent 21-day cycle (Group B); treatment continued for ≤17 cycles. Results As of January 21, 2020, mosunetuzumab 0.4/1.0/2.8 mg to 1/2/13.5 mg (C1D1/8/15 dose levels) was given to 62 pts with FL who received ≥2 prior systemic therapies. Pts had a median age of 59 (27–85) years, median number of 3 (2–11) prior therapies; 33 pts (53%) were double refractory, 30 (48%) had progression of disease within 24 months of first-line treatment (POD24), and four (6%) received prior chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy. Overall response rate (ORR) and CR rate were 68% and 50%, respectively. In high-risk pts, consistent CR rates were observed: 55% (18/33) in pts with double refractory disease, 53% (16/30) in pts who had POD24, 78% (7/9) in pts with PI3Ki refractory FL, and 50% (2/4) in those who received prior CAR-T therapy. Twenty-six pts with a CR (74%) remained in remission (median time on study: 14.4 months). In responders (n=42), median duration of response was 20.4 months (95% CI: 11.7–not reached), and median progression-free survival was 11.8 months (95% CI: 7.3–21.9). Adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs were reported in 60 (97%) and 22 pts (35%), respectively. The most common grade (Gr) ≥3 AEs included hypophosphatemia (23%) and neutropenia (21%). Fourteen pts (23%) experienced CRS1; events were mostly Gr 1 or 2, reversible, and occurred largely during C1. Conclusions A high CR rate, durable responses, and a manageable safety profile were observed with mosunetuzumab monotherapy in heavily pre-treated pts with FL, including high-risk pts.

Somatic mutations in phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (Patients were enrolled on the basis of localA total of 166 patients withTaselisib had limited activity in the tumor types tested and is no longer in development. This genome-driven study improves understanding of the activity, limitations, and resistance mechanisms of using PI3K inhibitors as monotherapy to target

Purpose: This single-arm, open-label phase II study evaluated the safety and efficacy of taselisib (GDC-0032) plus fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with locally advanced or metastatic HER2-negative, hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer.Patients and Methods: Patients received 6-mg oral taselisib capsules daily plus intramuscular fulvestrant (500 mg) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Tumor tissue (if available) was centrally evaluated for PIK3CA mutations. Adverse events (AE) were recorded using NCI-CTCAE v4.0. Tumor response was investigator-determined using RECIST v1.1.Results: Median treatment duration was 4.6 (range: 0.9–40.5) months. All patients experienced ≥1 AE, 30 (50.0%) had grade ≥3 AEs, and 19 (31.7%) experienced 35 serious AEs. Forty-seven of 60 patients had evaluable tissue for central PIK3CA mutation testing [20 had mutations, 27 had no mutation detected (MND)]. In patients with baseline measurable disease, clinical activity was observed in tumors with PIK3CA mutations [best confirmed response rate: 38.5% (5/13; 95% CI, 13.9–68.4); clinical benefit rate (CBR): 38.5% (5/13; 95% CI, 13.9–68.4)], PIK3CA-MND [best confirmed response rate: 14.3% (3/21; 95% CI, 3.0–36.3); CBR: 23.8% (5/21; 95% CI, 8.2–47.2)], and unknown PIK3CA mutation status [best confirmed response rate: 20.0% (2/10; 95% CI, 2.5–55.6); CBR: 30.0% (3/10; 95% CI, 6.7–65.2)].Conclusions: Taselisib plus fulvestrant had clinical activity irrespective of PIK3CA mutation status, with numerically higher objective response rate and CBR in patients with PIK3CA-mutated (vs. -MND) locally advanced or metastatic HER2-negative, HR-positive breast cancer. No new safety signals were reported. A confirmatory phase III trial is ongoing. Clin Cancer Res; 24(18); 4380–7. ©2018 AACR.

PURPOSE: This open-label, phase Ib, dose-escalation, and dose-expansion study (NCT01862081) evaluated taselisib with a taxane in locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (BC) and/or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients received taselisib (2-6 mg tablet or 3-6 mg capsule) plus docetaxel or paclitaxel. Primary endpoints were safety, dose-limiting toxicities, maximum tolerated dose, and identification of a recommended phase II dose. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity assessment. RESULTS: Eighty patients (BC: 72; NSCLC: 7; BC/NSCLC: 1) were enrolled (docetaxel-receiving arms: 21; paclitaxel-receiving arms: 59). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and AEs leading to death were reported in 90.5%, 42.9%, and 14.3% of patients, respectively (docetaxel-receiving arms), and 78.9%, 40.4%, and 3.5% of patients, respectively (paclitaxel-receiving arms). Eight patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities. The maximum tolerated dose was exceeded with 3 mg taselisib (capsule) for 21 consecutive days plus 75 mg/m2 docetaxel and not exceeded with 6 mg taselisib (tablet) for 5 days on/2 days off plus 80 mg/m2 paclitaxel. Objective response rates and clinical benefit rates were 35.0% and 45.0%, respectively (docetaxel-receiving arms), and 20.4% and 27.8%, respectively (paclitaxel-receiving arms). Exposure for paclitaxel or docetaxel plus taselisib was consistent with the single agents. CONCLUSIONS: Taselisib in combination with a taxane has a challenging safety profile. Despite evidence of antitumor activity, the benefit-risk profile was deemed not advantageous. Further development is not planned. ispartof: BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT vol:178 issue:1 pages:121-133 ispartof: location:Netherlands status: published

SUMMARY Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, necessitating further improvements in diagnosis and therapy. Targeted therapies directed against chromatin regulators are emerging as promising approaches in preclinical studies and early clinical trials. Here, we demonstrate an oncogenic role for the protein lysine methyltransferase SETDB2 in leukemia pathogenesis. It is overexpressed in pre-BCR+ ALL and required for their maintenance in vitro and in vivo. SETDB2 expression is maintained as a direct target gene of the chimeric transcription factor E2A-PBX1 in a subset of ALL and suppresses expression of the cell-cycle inhibitor CDKN2C through histone H3K9 tri-methylation, thus establishing an oncogenic pathway subordinate to E2A-PBX1 that silences a major tumor suppressor in ALL. In contrast, SETDB2 was relatively dispensable for normal hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell proliferation. SETDB2 knockdown enhances sensitivity to kinase and chromatin inhibitors, providing a mechanistic rationale for targeting SETDB2 therapeutically in ALL., Graphical abstract In Brief: Lin et al. report that the protein lysine methyltransferase SETDB2 is a direct target of chimeric transcription factor E2A-PBX1 and required for pathogenesis in B cell precursor leukemia. SETDB2 suppresses expression of the cell-cycle inhibitor CDKN2C, establishing an oncogenic pathway that silences a major tumor suppressor in acute leukemia.

Background: Patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) remain an unmet need population. Monotherapy with mosunetuzumab (M), a CD20xCD3 bispecific antibody, has demonstrated high and consistent response rates in high-risk R/R FL subsets, with early evidence of response durability and a favorable benefit/risk profile (Assouline et al. ASH 2020). Lenalidomide (Len) is clinically active in pts with FL, and its potent immunomodulatory activity offers the potential for additive/synergistic efficacy when combined with M. Here, we present initial data from an ongoing Phase Ib study (NCT04246086) evaluating the safety and activity of M+Len in R/R FL pts who have received at least one prior line of therapy. Methods: Pts with R/R FL (Grade [Gr] 1-3a) and at least one prior systemic anti-cancer therapy were enrolled to receive 12 cycles of M+Len (cycle duration: Cycle [C] 1, 21 days; C2-12, 28 days). In C1, step-up doses of M (IV infusion) are given on C1 Day (D)1 (1mg) and C1D8 (2mg), with the target dose given on C1D15 (30mg) and on D1 of C2-12. Len (20mg orally) is administered on D1-21 of C2-12. No hospitalization is mandated by the protocol. The primary objective is to evaluate the safety of M+Len; secondary objectives include assessment of response and long-term efficacy outcomes. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is reported using ASTCT criteria (Lee et al. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2019). Responses are assessed by investigators with PET-CT using Lugano 2014 criteria (Cheson et al. J Clin Oncol 2014). Results: At data cut-off (May 31, 2021), 27 pts had been enrolled. Median age was 59 years (range: 31-79 years); 12 pts (44%) were male. All pts had an ECOG performance status of 0 (18 pts, 67%) or 1 (9 pts, 33%). Median number of prior lines of therapy was 1 (range: 1-4), and 3 pts (11%) had disease progression (PD) 9 months. All 27 pts were safety evaluable at data cut-off. Twenty pts (74%) experienced ≥1 adverse event (AE) of any Gr; the most common AE was CRS (8 pts, 30%). Gr 3-4 AEs occurred in 8 pts (30%) and serious AEs in 8 pts (30%). No Gr 5 (fatal) AEs were observed. AEs relating to M occurred in 20 pts (74%) and AEs relating to Len occurred in 10 pts (37%). There were no AEs leading to withdrawal of M or Len; 2 pts had M-related AEs leading to M dose delays, 6 pts (22%) had Len-related AEs leading to Len dose interruption and/or reduction. In all pts, CRS events were Gr 1 (7/8 pts) or Gr 2 (1/8 pts). For most pts (6/8), CRS events occurred C1D1-C1D7; 2 pts experienced Gr 1 CRS events in C2. Median time to CRS onset was 1 day after first study drug administration (range: 1-28 days), median CRS duration was 3 days (range: 2-5 days). All CRS events resolved without sequelae. No pt required tocilizumab, ICU admission, high flow oxygen, or vasopressor support. Five pts (19%) reported 14 events of Gr 3-4 neutropenia; all neutropenia events occurred between D41 and D218, with a duration of 6-16 days. All neutropenia events resolved, with 1 patient receiving primary G-CSF prophylaxis and 2 pts receiving G-CSF treatment. No febrile neutropenia events occurred. The efficacy-evaluable population included all pts who had been assessed for response at any time on study, who had withdrawn from treatment or study prior to reaching their first response assessment, or who had been on study long enough to have reached their first scheduled response assessment, planned per protocol for D15-21 of C3. Objective response rate in the 13 pts who were efficacy evaluable at data cut-off was 92%, with complete metabolic response observed in 10 pts (77%), partial metabolic response (PMR) in 2 pts (15%), and stable disease in 1 patient (8%). One pt who initially achieved PMR experienced PD after 8 cycles of treatment. Conclusions: M+Len appears to have an acceptable safety profile in pts with R/R FL who have received at least one prior line of therapy, with encouraging preliminary anti-lymphoma activity observed. These data support initiation of a randomized Phase III study of M+Len versus rituximab+Len. Updated safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic data will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Morschhauser: AstraZenenca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Genmab: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy. Bishton: Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust: Current Employment; Celltrion: Honoraria; Tevapharma: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Eyre: Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust: Current Employment; LOXO Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; KITE/Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Secura Bio: Consultancy, Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Bachy: Kite, a Gilead Company: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Daiishi: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy. Cartron: Roche, Celgene-BMS: Consultancy; Danofi, Gilead, Novartis, Jansen, Roche, Celgene-BMS, Abbvie, Takeda: Honoraria. Ysebaert: AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Bobillo: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau. Budde: Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding. Fox: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Knapp: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment. Yaqub: Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment. Wei: Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. O'Hear: Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Li: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment. Townsend: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene (Bristol-Myers Squibb): Consultancy, Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: Mosunetuzumab is a CD20xCD3 bispecific antibody that redirects T cells to engage and eliminate malignant B cells. Mosunetuzumab is an investigational agent.

Introduction: Mosunetuzumab (M; RG7828) is a full-length, fully humanized immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) bispecific antibody targeting both CD3 (on the surface of T cells) and CD20 (on the surface of B cells). Clinical data from GO29781 (NCT02500407), a Phase I/Ib study in relapsed or refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) pts, indicate that M has promising efficacy and safety (Budde et al. ASH 2018; Bartlett et al. ASCO 2019). We report the characterization of exposure-response (E-R) relationships for safety and efficacy to inform clinical dose/regimen finding. Methods: DATA: Data from Group A (0.05 to 2.8mg q3w dosing) and Group B (0.4/1/2.8 to 1/2/27mg Cycle 1 Day 1/8/15 step-up dosing, followed by q3w dosing) were analyzed. E-R for safety was assessed in 142 evaluable pts by dosing Group. E-R for efficacy was assessed in 130 evaluable pts by aggressive (a) (n=83, primarily DLBCL and transformed FL) and indolent (i) (n=47, primarily FL) NHL histologies. PHARMACOKINETIC (PK) ENDPOINTS: Pt-specific PK exposure metrics, including AUC and Cmax, were derived using a preliminary two-compartment population PK model with time-dependent clearance. Due to the presence of residual rituximab (R) at baseline from prior treatments, an additional exposure metric of average CD20 receptor occupancy (RO%) of M was derived based on the serum PK and binding affinity (KD) of both agents to assess the impact of target binding competition over time. E-R ANALYSES: Objective response rate (ORR), complete response rate (CRR), and adverse event (AE) rates, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurological AEs (NAE), were summarized by exposure-tertiles and the E-R relationships modeled by logistic regression (linear or Emax models). Response rates and E-R were further assessed in subgroups by RO% tertiles and baseline factors, such as the number of prior lines of therapy, refractory status, lactate dehydrogenase level, and tumor burden, and modeled by multivariate logistic regression. Results: R was present at modest levels at baseline in aNHL pts (median, 3 µg/ml, 33% of pts below quantitation limit [BQL] of 0.5µg/ml) but minimally in iNHL pts (median, Conclusions: E-R analyses indicate promising therapeutic benefit/risk of M in R/R NHL pts. Step-up dosing mitigated CRS-related toxicities, resulting in a broad therapeutic window of M that enables further dose escalation to maximize efficacy. The lack of E-R for safety was contrasted by a steep E-R for efficacy whereby higher M exposures overcome target binding competition in pts with residual R. Our analyses provide useful guidance for the dosing strategy of CD20-targeting T-cell bispecifics. Disclosures Li: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bender:Genentech, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yin:Genentech, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Li:Pro Unlimited - Genentech, Inc. contractor: Employment; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhang:Genentech, Inc., SSF: Employment. Hernandez:Genentech, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kwan:Genentech, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sun:Harpoon Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd / Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Adamkewicz:Genentech, Inc.: Employment; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Equity Ownership. Wang:Genentech, Inc.: Employment; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Equity Ownership. Dimier:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lim:Genentech, Inc.: Employment. O'Hear:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Equity Ownership; Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Sehn:Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Ortho: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; TEVA Pharmaceuticals Industries: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Morphosys: Consultancy, Honoraria; TEVA Pharmaceuticals Industries: Consultancy, Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Apobiologix: Consultancy, Honoraria; Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Morphosys: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Ortho: Honoraria; Lundbeck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria; Lundbeck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria. Flinn:AbbVie, Seattle Genetics, TG Therapeutics, Verastem: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics, Trillum Therapeutics, Abbvie, ArQule, BeiGene, Curis, FORMA Therapeutics, Forty Seven, Merck, Pfizer, Takeda, Teva, Verastem, Gilead Sciences, Astra Zeneca (AZ), Juno Therapeutics, UnumTherapeutics, MorphoSys, AG: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma, Agios, Calithera Biosciences, Celgene, Constellation Pharmaceuticals, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Incyte, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Kite Pharma, Novartis, Pharmacyclics, Portola Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics, Trillum Therapeutics, Abbvie, ArQule, BeiGene, Curis, FORMA Therapeutics, Forty Seven, Merck, Pfizer, Takeda, Teva, Verastem, Gilead Sciences, Astra Zeneca (AZ), Juno Therapeutics, UnumTherapeutics, MorphoSys, AG: Research Funding. Yoon:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy; Kyowa Hako Kirin: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Yuhan Pharma: Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; MSD: Consultancy. Budde:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy. Li:Genentech, Inc. / F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Employment. Wei:Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Employment, Equity Ownership. OffLabel Disclosure: Mosunetuzumab (RG7828) is a full-length, fully humanized immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) bispecific antibody targeting both CD3 (on the surface of T cells) and CD20 (on the surface of B cells). Mosunetuzumab redirects T cells to engage and eliminate malignant B cells. Mosunetuzumab is an investigational agent.

Introduction: Improved treatments are needed for relapsed or refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) pts. Options are particularly limited for pts with B-cell NHLs who are R/R to CAR-T therapies or for whom a delay in effective therapy precludes this approach. Mosunetuzumab (M; RG7828) is a full-length, fully humanized immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) bispecific antibody targeting both CD3 (on the surface of T cells) and CD20 (on the surface of B cells). In an ongoing Phase I/Ib study (GO29781; NCT02500407), promising efficacy and favorable tolerability were observed in R/R NHL pts (Budde et al. ASH 2018; Bartlett et al. ASCO 2019). We report complete remissions (CRs) with M in NHL pts who are R/R to CAR-T therapy, as well as activity with M re-treatment. Methods: GO29781 is an open-label, multicenter, Phase I/Ib, dose escalation and expansion study of M in R/R B-cell NHL. Data is presented from Group B, in which M is administered with step-up dosing on Days 1, 8, and 15 of Cycle 1, and then as a fixed dose on Day 1 of each subsequent 21-day cycle (maximum 17 cycles). Outcome measures include best objective response rate (ORR) by revised International Working Group criteria, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and tolerability. Results: As of June 4, 2019, 218 pts in Group B had received any amount of M. Indolent NHL (iNHL) pts (n=72) were mainly follicular lymphoma (FL, n=69). Aggressive NHL (aNHL) pts (n=141) were mainly diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, n=87) or transformed FL (trFL, n=29). Median prior systemic therapies was 3 (range: 1-14). Twenty-three pts had prior CAR-T therapy (12 DLBCL, 6 trFL, 5 FL), and 16 were efficacy evaluable (7 DLBCL, 5 trFL, 4 FL). ORR and CR rates were 43.8% (7/16) and 25.0% (4/16, 2 DLBCL and 2 FL), respectively. Expansion of previously administered CAR-Ts after M administration was detected by quantitative PCR, in line with the mechanism of action of M. Dose escalation is ongoing, supported by a positive exposure-response relationship for efficacy and broad therapeutic window with step-up dosing (Li et al. ASH 2019). Among efficacy-evaluable pts across all dose levels, ORR and CR rates were 64.1% (41/64) and 42.2% (27/64) in iNHL pts and 34.7% (41/119) and 18.6% (22/119) in aNHL pts, respectively. CRs appeared durable, with 25/27 (92.6%) iNHL pts (median time from first CR: 5.8 months; range: 0.2-28.9) and 15/22 (68.2%) aNHL pts (median time from first CR: 8.8 months; range: 0.0-25.4) who achieved CR remaining in remission. Re-treatment with M was allowed in CR pts who relapsed. Four pts, including 1 in Group A who was initially treated with a fixed, non-step-up dosing schedule, received M re-treatment. One CR and 2 partial responses were observed. All three responses are ongoing, with the CR pt in second remission for 314 days. The MTD of M has not been reached at doses up to 1/2/60mg (Cycle 1 Day 1, 8, and 15). Adverse events (AEs) leading to treatment withdrawal were uncommon (12/218, 5.5%). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS), graded by Lee criteria (Lee et al. Blood 2014;124:188-95), was observed in 28.4% of pts, and was mostly Grade (Gr) 1 (21.1%) or Gr 2 (6.0%); Gr 3 CRS occurred in 1.4% of pts. Most CRS events occurred in Cycle 1; 5 pts (2.7%) had CRS during or after Cycle 2. Three of 218 pts (1.4%) received tocilizumab for CRS management; all 3 events resolved without sequelae (for 1 pt, CRS resolved after the cutoff date). Neurological AEs (NAEs) were reported in 44% of pts (Gr 1, 28.0%; Gr 2, 12.8%; Gr 3, 3.2%). Common NAEs were headache (14.7%), insomnia (10.1%), and dizziness (9.2%). Potential immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS)-like NAEs of Gr 1 or Gr 2 confusional state occurred in 3 pts (1.4%) during cycles 1 and 2. The frequency of CRS and NAEs did not correlate with M exposure, likely due to step-up dosing, which effectively mitigates acute toxicities and allows administration of higher doses (Bartlett et al. ASCO 2019; Li et al. ASH 2019). Among the 4 pts who were re-treated with M, no CRS was observed and NAEs were reported in 1 pt (Gr 1 headache and insomnia). Among the 23 pts who were R/R to CAR-T therapy, CRS occurred in 5 pts (21.7%; Gr 1, 13.0%; Gr 2, 4.3%; Gr 3, 4.3%) and NAEs in 8 pts (34.8%; Gr 1, 17.4%; Gr 2, 13.0%; Gr 3, 4.3%), with no ICANS-like events. Conclusions: M has favorable tolerability and durable efficacy in pts with heavily pre-treated R/R B-cell NHL, including CRs in pts with disease progression after CAR-T therapies. Preliminary data support the possibility for re-treatment with M. Disclosures Schuster: Novartis: Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: Combination CAR-T and PD-1 Inhibitors, Research Funding; Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy, Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Loxo Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Bartlett:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Autolus: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding. Assouline:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Yoon:Kyowa Hako Kirin: Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; MSD: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Yuhan Pharma: Research Funding. Bosch:Kyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Sehn:Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Lundbeck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Lundbeck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Morphosys: Consultancy, Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Apobiologix: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Morphosys: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; TEVA Pharmaceuticals Industries: Consultancy, Honoraria; Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Ortho: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Ortho: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; TEVA Pharmaceuticals Industries: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cheah:Janssen: Honoraria; Acerta: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Loxo: Honoraria. Shadman:Mustang Biopharma: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; AbbVIe: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Sound Biologics: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Atara: Consultancy; Bigene: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Verastem: Consultancy; Acerta: Research Funding; Emergent: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Gregory:MSD: Other: grant pending, Research Funding; Beigene: Other: Grant pending, Research Funding; Celgene: Other: grant pending, Research Funding; Monash University: Research Funding; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Other: grant pending, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: grant pending, Research Funding; Melbourne Haematology: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel fees and conference support, Speakers Bureau. Wei:Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yin:Genentech, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kwan:Genentech, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yousefi:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Employment. Hernandez:Genentech, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Li:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Employment, Equity Ownership. O'Hear:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Equity Ownership; Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Budde:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy. Off Label Disclosure: Mosunetuzumab (RG7828) is a full-length, fully humanized immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) bispecific antibody targeting both CD3 (on the surface of T cells) and CD20 (on the surface of B cells). Mosunetuzumab redirects T cells to engage and eliminate malignant B cells. Mosunetuzumab is an investigational agent.

Introduction: Neurologic toxicities have resulted in restrictions in driving/engaging in hazardous occupations and activities for pts receiving marketed T-cell-engaging CD19-directed bispecific antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies. Mosunetuzumab (M; RG7828) is a full-length, fully humanized immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) bispecific antibody targeting both CD3 (on the surface of T cells) and CD20 (on the surface of B cells). Clinical trials investigating the safety and preliminary efficacy of M currently mandate a driving restriction for enrolled pts while receiving treatment. Data collected to date show that neurologic toxicities associated with M may be milder than for other CD19-directed therapies, which may be due in part to the step-up dosing regimens investigated (Budde et al. ASH 2018; Bartlett et al. ASCO 2019). We initiated a systematic review of neurologic adverse events (NAEs) in pts treated with M to characterize the nature of driving-impacting NAEs and to develop a more patient-centric approach to NAE risk-mitigation that would reduce the burden on pts in M clinical trials. Methods: A systematic review of NAEs observed in the ongoing Phase I/Ib study (GO29781; NCT02500407) of M in relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) pts (n=205) was performed (data cutoff: Jan 31, 2019; median safety follow-up: 116 days). NAEs were defined as any AE reported as a Preferred Term (PT) within the System Organ Class (SOC) Nervous System Disorders and SOC Psychiatric Disorders, as recommended by FDA. NAEs were further classified by those that have impact on cognition and consciousness (CC-NAEs), and those that may impair driving (DI-CC-NAEs). In conjunction with an independent neurology consultant, DI-CC-NAEs were adjudicated based on medical judgement and determined a priori based on reported PTs. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression with a 5% significance level was performed to determine the association of demographic and disease characteristics with DI-CC-NAEs occurring in the first 3 cycles of M treatment, as 90% (27/30) of events occurred within this period. Results: NAEs were observed in 49% (100/205) of enrolled pts and were mostly grade (Gr) 1-2 (Gr 1, 69/205 [34%]; Gr 2, 24/205 [12%]). The most frequent NAEs were headache (32/205, 16%), dizziness (27/205, 13%), and insomnia (19/205, 9%). Gr ≥3 NAEs were rare (3%, all Gr 3) and occurred as clinical sequelae to non-NAEs (e.g. Gr 3 hepatic encephalopathy secondary to Gr 4 liver function test increased, Gr 3 seizure secondary to electrolyte disturbance, Gr 3 post-herpetic neuralgia). The majority of NAEs occurred early and were transient (median onset from first M infusion: 16 days; median duration: 10 days). Most resolved (11% were unresolved at time of data cut). Frequency of NAEs was not associated with M dose level (Figure) or exposure (Li et al. ASH 2019). At the time of data cut, 30 DI-CC-NAEs (Gr 1, 17/30 [57%]; Gr 2, 9/30 [30%]; Gr 3, 4/30 [13%]) were reported, including PTs of confusional state, delirium, disturbance in attention, encephalopathy, hallucination, memory impairment, and seizure. These events were observed in 24 (12%) pts, and were mostly Gr 1-2 (26/30, 87%). Three pts experienced four Gr 3 DI-CC-NAEs (confusional state, hepatic encephalopathy, encephalopathy, seizure). The majority of DI-CC-NAEs (67%) occurred in pts with aggressive NHL (aNHL) and who had elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) at baseline based on the local institutional upper limit of normal (sensitivity: 67%; specificity: 66%; positive predictive value: 23%; negative predictive value: 93%; Table). Other characteristics included in the multivariate analysis were age, sex, and tumor bulk, but these did not demonstrate association with occurrence of DI-CC-NAEs. Conclusion: Based on these analyses, the driving restriction that applied to all pts for the duration of M treatment was amended to a restriction covering the first 2 cycles only in a subset of pts who had aNHL and elevated CRP at baseline. This novel approach of individualized risk mitigation for driving based on in-depth assessment of NAEs allows for a more targeted and patient-centric mitigation strategy to optimize the protection of pts at risk, and is useful during clinical development when the safety profile is being characterized. As further data are accumulated, the multivariate analysis can be updated to further refine the pts at risk for DI-CC-NAE. Disclosures Diefenbach: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Denovo: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; MEI: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium/Takeda: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding. Assouline:Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Bosch:Kyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Cheah:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Acerta: Honoraria; Loxo: Honoraria. Kim:J + J: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celltrion: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Donga: Research Funding; Kyowa-Kirin: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Research Funding. Matasar:Merck: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses , Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses , Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accomodation, expenses, Research Funding; Rocket Medical: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Consultancy; Bayer: Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy. Panizo:Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Yoon:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Research Funding. Bender:Genentech, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hernandez:Genentech, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Li:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Employment, Equity Ownership. McCall:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Equity Ownership; Genentech, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. O'Hear:Genentech, Inc.: Employment; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Equity Ownership. Wei:Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yin:Genentech, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yousefi:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Employment. Kwan:Genentech, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Nastoupil:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria; Spectrum: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: Mosunetuzumab (RG7828) is a full-length, fully humanized immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) bispecific antibody targeting both CD3 (on the surface of T cells) and CD20 (on the surface of B cells). Mosunetuzumab redirects T cells to engage and eliminate malignant B cells. Mosunetuzumab is an investigational agent.

Introduction: Mosunetuzumab (M; RG7828) is a full-length, fully humanized immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) bispecific antibody targeting both CD3 (on the surface of T cells) and CD20 (on the surface of B cells). It drives tumor B-cell killing independent of T-cell specificity and has been shown clinically to have single-agent activity in relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma, with durable complete responses (CR) at doses as low as 1.2mg (Budde et al. ASH 2018). We present biomarker data from the ongoing first-in-human multicenter Phase I/Ib study GO29781 (NCT02500407), highlighting acute pharmacodynamic effects that confirm mechanism of action (MOA), support Cycle 1 step-up dosing to mitigate cytokine-driven toxicities, and potentially predict response. Methods: Patients (pts) with biomarker data in Group A (0.05 to 2.8mg q3w dosing, n=30) and Group B (0.4/1/2.8 to 1/2/40.5mg Cycle 1 Day 1/8/15 step-up dosing, followed by q3w dosing) were included in the analyses. Peripheral biomarkers were evaluated using whole blood flow cytometry, plasma cytokine ELISA, and ex-vivo single-cell cytokine assay of cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Tumor biomarkers were assessed through CD20 immunohistochemistry and CD8/Ki67 immunofluorescence staining. Average CD20 receptor occupancy (RO%), which takes into account residual levels of rituximab that may compete with M for target binding, was used to characterize the exposure-pharmacodynamic response relationship (Li et al. ASH 2019). Results: Pharmacodynamic changes were observed in peripheral blood by 4 hours (hrs) after infusion of sub-efficacious doses of M in Group A. Transient reduction of circulating T cells was evident starting at the lowest doses administered of 0.05-0.2mg, with decreased cell numbers by 4 hrs after infusion and recovery by 72 hrs. At doses between 0.4-0.8mg, T-cell activation was observed in some pts, as evidenced by upregulation of CD69 on both CD8+ and CD4+ T cells and elevation of IFN-γ in plasma. At 1.2mg (minimal efficacious dose) to 2.8mg, all of these changes were detected in the majority of pts. M induced depletion of circulating B cells immediately after the first dose, which was sustained for the duration of treatment, even in pts refractory to prior anti-CD20 therapy. IL-6 levels peaked within 24 hrs of the Cycle 1 Day 1 dose and the kinetics of IL-6 increase were associated with the onset of cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Hence, step-up dosing at Cycle 1 was implemented in Group B to maintain the IL-6 peak at reasonably low levels and reduce the risk of toxicity. With step-up dosing, pharmacodynamic changes, including transient T-cell decrease, T-cell activation, and cytokine production, remained strongest within 4 hrs of the Cycle 1 Day 1 dose, despite higher subsequent and total cumulative doses. IL-6 peaks were similar in Group A and Group B and were in line with the low grades of CRS observed to date (Schuster et al. ASH 2019). In pts for whom the Cycle 1 Day 1 dose was fixed at 1mg, the acute pharmacodynamic changes were found to be associated with RO% at Day 1. In a subset of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma pts, functional assays showed that peripheral T cells taken at baseline from pts who achieved CR secreted multiple effector cytokines, such as IFN-γ, TNF-α, and Granzyme B, upon M stimulation ex vivo, whereas T cells from pts with progressive disease did not show this capacity. Analysis of tumor biopsies showed similar baseline levels of CD8+ tumor infiltrating T-cells (TILs) between responders and non-responders. M induced increases in CD8+ TILs, which were mostly Ki67-, as early as Cycle 1. The median on-treatment CD8+ TIL level was significantly higher in responders than non-responders. Conclusions: T-cell activation, cytokine elevation, and B-cell depletion in the periphery are among the earliest biomarkers of M activity and precede clinical responses. Acute pharmacodynamic changes confirm the MOA and inform dose/schedule selection. In particular, the 1mg Cycle 1 Day 1 dose, which was chosen to mitigate CRS and to dissociate toxicity and efficacy at higher subsequent doses, still induced potent pharmacodynamic changes. Finally, the data suggest a model whereby clinical efficacy may be critically dependent on activation and migration of functional T cells from the periphery into the tumor bed. Disclosures Hernandez: Genentech, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Huw:Roche/ Genentech: Employment, Equity Ownership. Belousov:Roche: Employment. Wilson:Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Koeppen:Genentech, Inc.: Employment; Roche: Equity Ownership. McCord:Roche: Equity Ownership; Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Peng:Genentech inc. / Roche: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bartlett:Affimed: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Autolus: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding. Budde:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy. Assouline:Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Nastoupil:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Spectrum: Honoraria. Yoon:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Research Funding. Matasar:Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses , Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses , Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accomodation, expenses, Research Funding; Rocket Medical: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Consultancy; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Bayer: Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses. Bender:Genentech, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kwan:Genentech, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Li:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Employment, Equity Ownership. O'Hear:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Equity Ownership; Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Yin:Genentech, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wei:Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Employment, Equity Ownership. Adamkewicz:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Equity Ownership; Genentech, Inc.: Employment. OffLabel Disclosure: Mosunetuzumab (RG7828) is a full-length, fully humanized immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) bispecific antibody targeting both CD3 (on the surface of T cells) and CD20 (on the surface of B cells). Mosunetuzumab redirects T cells to engage and eliminate malignant B cells. Mosunetuzumab is an investigational agent.

Dasatinib is a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for treatment of Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), but its efficacy is limited by resistance. Recent preclinical studies suggest that dasatinib may be a candidate therapy in additional ALL subtypes including pre-BCR+ ALL. Here we utilized shRNA library screening and global transcriptomic analysis to identify several novel genes and pathways that may enhance dasatinib efficacy or mitigate potential resistance in human pre-BCR+ ALL. Depletion of the transcriptional co-activator CBP increased dasatinib sensitivity by downregulating transcription of the pre-BCR signaling pathway previously associated with dasatinib sensitivity. Acquired resistance was due in part to upregulation of alternative pathways including WNT through a mechanism suggesting transcriptional plasticity. Small molecules that disrupt CBP interactions with the CREB KID domain or β-catenin showed promising preclinical efficacy in combination with dasatinib. These findings highlight novel modulators of sensitivity to targeted therapies in human pre-BCR+ ALL, which can be reversed by small molecules inhibitors. They also identify promising therapeutic approaches to ameliorate dasatinib sensitivity and prevent resistance in ALL.

CD47 is a transmembrane receptor that inhibits phagocytosis. Over-expression of CD47 is associated with an increased risk of tumor growth and metastasis. Clinical trials based on anti-CD47 therapy in adults are underway in a variety of malignancies. CD47 has been shown to be over-expressed in conventional hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a common liver tumor in adults. To our knowledge, there have been no studies to evaluate CD47 expression in the fibrolamellar subtype of HCC (FL-HCC), common in children and young adults. This study will evaluate CD47 expression in FL-HCC and shed light on its suitability for anti-CD47 therapy.Using immunohistochemistry, 10 samples of FL-HCC from 8 patients were evaluated for CD47 (anti-phagocytic) and calreticulin (pro-phagocytic) expression. By direct comparison, CD47 and calreticulin expression were evaluated in 21 samples of conventional HCC. Additionally, transcriptome sequencing to detect CD47 mRNA expression was performed on fresh tissue from 1 FL-HCC institutional patient and previously published sequencing data from 20 additional samples was reviewed.Immunohistochemistry showed only weak CD47 expression in 20% of FL-HCC samples. In contrast, 57% of conventional HCC samples showed CD47 expression. All (100%) FL-HCC samples showed moderate or strong calreticulin expression. The difference between CD47 and calreticulin expression in FL-HCC is statistically significant (CD47 is not over-expressed in FL-HCC. Our studies provide no support for expanding ongoing clinical trials in adults to include children and young adults with FL-HCC.