Search

ObjectiveSynthesise evidence for effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions following ACL and/or meniscal tear on symptomatic, functional, clinical, psychosocial, quality of life and reinjury outcomes.DesignOverview of systematic reviews with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation certainty of evidence.Data sourcesMEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus and Cochrane Library.Eligibility criteriaSystematic reviews of randomised controlled trials investigating rehabilitation interventions following ACL and/or meniscal tears in young adults.ResultsWe included 22 systematic reviews (142 trials of mostly men) evaluating ACL-injured individuals and none evaluating isolated meniscal injuries. We synthesised data from 16 reviews evaluating 12 different interventions. Moderate-certainty evidence was observed for: (1) neuromuscular electrical stimulation to improve quadriceps strength; (2) open versus closed kinetic chain exercises to be similarly effective for quadriceps strength and self-reported function; (3) structured home-based versus structured in-person rehabilitation to be similarly effective for quadriceps and hamstring strength and self-reported function; and (4) postoperative knee bracing being ineffective for physical function and laxity. There was low-certainty evidence that: (1) preoperative exercise therapy improves self-reported and physical function postoperatively; (2) cryotherapy reduces pain and analgesic use; (3) psychological interventions improve anxiety/fear; and (4) whole body vibration improves quadriceps strength. There was very low-certainty evidence that: (1) protein-based supplements improve quadriceps size; (2) blood flow restriction training improves quadriceps size; (3) neuromuscular control exercises improve quadriceps and hamstring strength and self-reported function; and (4) continuous passive motion has no effect on range of motion.ConclusionThe general level of evidence for rehabilitation after ACL or meniscal tear was low. Moderate-certainty evidence indicates that several rehabilitation types can improve quadriceps strength, while brace use has no effect on knee function/laxity.

To examine the effects of 15 min of high intensity treadmill running on concussion testing assessed by the King-Devick test.Prospective Cohort Study.Participants self-selected to either a running or a control group. At baseline both groups were assessed using the King-Devick concussion test. The running group then completed 15-minutes of treadmill running at rating of perceived exertion of 7-9/10 while the control group sat quietly. Both groups repeated the King-Devick test following that 15-minute period.Participants (n = 84 men, 53 women) were divided in two groups; running or control. Both groups, on average, had significant improvement after 15 min (suggesting a learning effect). Comparisons between the baseline and re-assessment scores indicated impaired performance was more common following high intensity treadmill running (n = 23 participants, 34.3%) compared to the control group (n = 10 participants, 14.3%, p = 0.006, OR = 3.44 [95%CI 1.40-8.50]). Four participants in the running group worsened their score at reassessment by more than 3 s compared to no participants in the control group.After 15 min of high intensity treadmill running, 1 in 3 participants scored a slower time at follow-up or committed a mistake compared to baseline. Implications for clinical practise include: the recommendation that baseline tests be conducted at rest and after high intensity exercise to provide accurate comparisons to assist in clinical decision making; and a cut-off of3 s may be a clinically useful difference between resting baseline and re-assessment using the King-Devick test.