1. Understanding economic analysis and cost–effectiveness of CT scan-guided, 3-dimensional, robotic-arm assisted lower extremity arthroplasty: a systematic review
- Author
-
Kara Sarrel, Daniel Hameed, Jeremy Dubin, Michael A Mont, David J Jacofsky, and Andrea B Coppolecchia
- Subjects
3-dimensional planning ,computed tomography ,cost–effectiveness ,cost savings ,economic advantages ,episodes of care ,health economics ,length of stay ,payors ,post-discharge period ,robotic-arm assisted joint arthroplasty ,total hip arthroplasty ,total knee arthroplasty ,unicompartmental knee arthroplasty ,Public aspects of medicine ,RA1-1270 - Abstract
Aim: The overall goal of this review was to examine the cost-utility of robotic-arm assisted surgery versus manual surgery. Methods: We performed a systematic review of all health economic studies that compared CT-based robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty with manual techniques. The papers selected focused on various cost-utility measures. In addition, where appropriate, secondary aims encompassed various clinical outcomes (e.g., readmissions, discharges to subacute care, etc.). Only articles directly comparing CT-based robotic-arm assisted joint arthroplasty with manual joint arthroplasty were included, for a resulting total of 21 reports. Results: Almost all twenty-one studies demonstrated a positive effect of CT scan-guided robotic-assisted joint arthroplasty on health economic outcomes. For studies reporting on 90-day episodes of costs, 10 out of 12 found lower costs in the robotic-arm assisted groups. Conclusion: Robotic-arm assisted joint arthroplasty patients had shorter lengths of stay and cost savings based on their 90-day episodes of care, among other metrics. Payors would likely benefit from encouraging the use of this CT-based robotic technology.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF