1. An Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel, Phase III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Polymeric Micelle-Formulated Paclitaxel Compared to Conventional Cremophor EL-Based Paclitaxel for Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
- Author
-
Sung Bae Kim, Si Young Kim, Yong Tai Kim, Jae Hong Seo, Chul Soo Kim, Soo Hyeon Lee, Eun Kyung Cho, In Hae Park, Hun Mo Ryoo, So Young Yoon, Tae-You Kim, Sun Ah Lee, Keun Seok Lee, Joohyuk Sohn, Kyung Hae Jung, Jungsil Ro, Yang Soo Kim, Hong Suk Song, Mi Ryung Jin, and Joo Seop Chung
- Subjects
Glycerol ,Oncology ,Cancer Research ,Polymers ,Receptor, ErbB-2 ,02 engineering and technology ,Gastroenterology ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,0302 clinical medicine ,Recurrence ,Risk Factors ,Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ,Neoplasm Metastasis ,Micelles ,Middle Aged ,Metastatic breast cancer ,021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology ,Genexol-PM ,Treatment Outcome ,Paclitaxel ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Retreatment ,Toxicity ,Original Article ,Female ,0210 nano-technology ,Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Polymeric micelle paclitaxel ,Breast Neoplasms ,Neutropenia ,03 medical and health sciences ,Breast cancer ,Cremophor EL-free ,Internal medicine ,Biomarkers, Tumor ,medicine ,Humans ,Aged ,Neoplasm Staging ,Proportional Hazards Models ,Polymeric micelles ,business.industry ,medicine.disease ,Confidence interval ,Peripheral neuropathy ,chemistry ,business - Abstract
Purpose Genexol-PM is a Cremophor EL–free formulation of low-molecular-weight, non-toxic, and biodegradable polymeric micelle-bound paclitaxel. We conducted a phase III study comparing the clinical efficacy and toxicity of Genexol-PM with conventional paclitaxel (Genexol). Materials and Methods Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive Genexol-PM 260 mg/m2 or Genexol 175 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks. The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR). Results The study enrolled 212 patients, of whom 105 were allocated to receive Genexol-PM. The mean received dose intensity of Genexol-PM was 246.8±21.3 mg/m2 (95.0%), and that of Genexol was 168.3±10.6 mg/m2 (96.2%). After a median follow-up of 24.5 months (range, 0.0 to 48.7 months), the ORR of Genexol-PM was 39.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.2 to 46.9) and the ORR of Genexol was 24.3% (95% CI, 17.5 to 31.1) (pnon-inferiority=0.021, psuperiority=0.016). The two groups did not differ significantly in overall survival (28.8 months for Genexol-PM vs. 23.8 months for Genexol; p=0.52) or progression-free survival (8.0 months for Genexol-PM vs. 6.7 months for Genexol; p=0.26). In both groups, the most common toxicities were neutropenia, with 68.6% occurrence in the Genexol-PM group versus 40.2% in the Genexol group (p < 0.01). The incidences of peripheral neuropathy of greater than grade 2 did not differ significantly between study treatments. Conclusion Compared with standard paclitaxel, Genexol-PM demonstrated non-inferior and even superior clinical efficacy with a manageable safety profile in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF