Search

We assessed if antiresorptive treatment can prevent aromatase inhibitor-induced bone loss in patients with early breast cancer. We observed that patients who did not receive antiresorptive treatment had a 20.8-fold increase in risk of bone loss after 24 months of aromatase inhibitors therapy., Purpose: This study aimed to describe changes in femoral and lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) after 24 months of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and antiresorptive treatment in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer., Methods: Prospective, longitudinal study in a real-life setting with a 2-year follow-up. Patients underwent a complete baseline bone assessment including clinical assessment, biological evaluation, BMD measurement, and spine X-ray. Antiresorptive treatment was prescribed to patients with a T-score <  - 2 or a T-score <  - 1.5 SD with additional osteoporosis risk factors. A follow-up bone assessment was carried out after 24 months., Results: Among 328 patients referred to our center, 168 patients (67.7 ± 10.6 years) were included in our study, and 144 were eligible for antiresorptive treatment. After 24 months, patients receiving antiresorptive treatment experienced a significant increase of + 6.28% in femoral-BMD (F-BMD) and + 7.79% in lumbar-BMD (L-BMD). This increase was not significantly different between osteoporotic and osteopenic patients. Conversely, patients not receiving antiresorptive treatment presented significant F-BMD and L-BMD loss regardless of the baseline BMD. In the multivariate logistic model, the lack of antiresorptive treatment was the only predictive factor for major femoral bone loss with a 20.83 odds ratio (CI95%:4.2-100, p < 0.001)., Conclusion: This real-life study confirmed that antiresorptive treatment significantly increases femoral and lumbar BMD regardless of the baseline BMD in postmenopausal patients receiving AIs for early breast cancer. Patients who did not receive antiresorptive treatment had a 20.8-fold increased risk of major bone loss. Nevertheless, the best threshold to adopt for starting antiresorptive agents remains undetermined., (© 2023. International Osteoporosis Foundation and Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation.)

Purpose of Review: Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have demonstrated survival benefits in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients, treated in both the advanced and the early settings., Recent Findings: As monotherapy, ICI failed to demonstrate a superiority over chemotherapy in pretreated advanced TNBC. In the first-line setting, ICI in combination with chemotherapy have shown consistent gains in progression-free survival in programmed death-ligand 1-positive TNBC, but only pembrolizumab indisputably demonstrated a significant overall survival benefit. In early-stage TNBC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), ICI may improve the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. In the KEYNOTE-522 trial enrolling stage II to III TNBC patients, pembrolizumab, in combination with a NAC composed of carboplatin-paclitaxel followed by anthracyclines, and continued in the adjuvant phase led to significant increases in both pCR and disease-free survival, a practice-changing result in the field. Importantly, no unexpected safety signal was observed, but the possibility of definitive ICI-related toxicities may be challenging in curable early disease., Summary: Immunotherapy is now an important component in the therapeutic management of TNBC. Unresolved issues include the best chemotherapy partners, additional biomarkers to maximize the clinical benefit, and the possible extension of its use to other breast cancer subtypes., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Overall, 2021 was marked by the confirmation of the major interest of cell cycle inhibitors for hormone receptor (HR) positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative advanced breast cancers with very high overall survival data exceeding five years for hormone-sensitive disease. Studies have also confirmed the efficacy and safety of this therapeutic class in the elderly population. New cell cycle inhibitors are under development (SHR6390). New combinations are also being evaluated, notably palbociclib with SAR439859 (a new selective estrogen receptor degrader: SERD). Targeting of the Phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3K) pathway by taselisib, in hormone-resistant disease with a Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-Bisphosphate 3-Kinase Catalytic Subunit Alpha (PIK3CA) mutation, modestly improves progression-free survival but with a non-negligible toxicity of the treatment., (Copyright © 2022 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: Recently, both immune checkpoint inhibitors and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors have demonstrated clinical benefit in some subsets of HER2-negative breast cancer patients. A biological rationale exists supporting a potential synergism between these compounds, which may further increase their antitumor activity in the clinic., Recent Findings: PARP inhibitors were shown to activate type I interferon pathway, thus eliciting local and general immune response, while inducing programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) up-regulation. In addition, the DNA damages created by PARP inhibition may increase tumor mutational burden and neo-antigens, thereby favoring efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Accordingly, clinical trials combining PARP inhibitors and agents targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis have been initiated in breast cancer in both advanced and early stages, enrolling patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutation, homologous recombination deficiency and/or with triple negative phenotype. Preliminary safety and efficacy results are encouraging, but it is still unclear whether the combination adds benefit compared with each therapeutic administered as single agent., Summary: Although a strong rationale exists to support the combination of PARP inhibitors with immune checkpoint inhibitors, future clinical trials will have to demonstrate whether it improves outcome and to identify which patients are the most likely to benefit from.

Background: Various hematological malignancies, including multiple myeloma, plasmacytoma, aggressive lymphoma, and indolent lymphoma, rarely result in spinal cord compression., Methods: Here, we retrospectively analyzed 32 patients with multiple myeloma (50%), plasmacytoma (13%), aggressive lymphoma (28%), and indolent lymphoma (9%), resulting in spinal cord compression (2004 and 2016). Patients averaged 57 years of age and presented with the indolent onset of spinal cord compression (91% of cases) resulting mostly in motor deficits (69%)., Results: Local treatment modalities included radiotherapy (RT) (28%) alone, decompressive surgery (28%) alone, or decompressive surgery with consolidation RT (40%). The 1-year overall survival was 70%, and the progression-free survival frequency was 62%., Conclusion: This study highlighted the importance of standardizing the indications for RT alone versus RT with surgery depending on the patient's underlying pathological diagnosis, neurological deficits, and radiological findings., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2020 Surgical Neurology International.)

Over the last few decades, improved knowledge of oncogenic activation mechanisms of HER2 protein has led to the development of HER2 targeted therapies that are currently commonly used in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer, such as trastuzumab, lapatinib, pertuzumab, and ado-trastuzumab emtansine. The management of this breast cancer subgroup has thus been revolutionized and its prognosis has changed dramatically. Nevertheless, HER2-positive advanced breast cancer remains an incurable disease and resistance to conventional anti-HER2 drugs is almost unavoidable. Nowadays, biochemical and pharmaceutical advances are meeting the challenge of developing increasingly sophisticated therapies directed against HER2, including novel anti HER2 antibodies with increased affinity. New antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) with more advanced pharmacological properties, and dual targeting of epitopes via bispecific monoclonal antibodies are also emerging. In addition, more potent and more specific HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors have shown interesting outcomes and are under development. Finally, researchers' interest in tumor microenvironment, particularly tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and the major role that signaling pathways, such as the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, play in the development of resistance to anti-HER2 therapies have spurred the development of clinical trials evaluating innovative combinations of anti-HER2 with PD-1/PDL-1, CDK4/6 and PI3K inhibitors. However, several questions remain unresolved, like the optimal management of HER2-positive/HR-positive advanced breast cancer and the identification of predictive biomarkers to better define populations that can benefit most from these new therapies and approaches., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest. AG received non-financial support (travel expenses, meeting registration) from Astra Zeneca, Pfizer, Roche, Novartis.