Search

Background: There is a strong rational of using anti-programmed cell death protein-1 and its ligand (anti-PD-1/L1) antibodies in human papillomavirus (HPV)-induced cancers. However, anti-PD-1/L1 as monotherapy induces a limited number of objective responses. The development of novel combinations in order to improve the clinical efficacy of an anti-PD-1/L1 is therefore of interest. Combining anti-PD-1/L1 therapy with an antitumor vaccine seems promising in HPV-positive (+) cancers. UCPVax is a therapeutic cancer vaccine composed of two separate peptides derived from telomerase (hTERT, human telomerase reverse transcriptase). UCPVax is being evaluated in a multicenter phase I/II study in NSCLC (non-small cell lung cancer) and has demonstrated to be safe and immunogenic. The aim of the VolATIL study is to evaluate the combination of atezolizumab (an anti-PD-L1) and UCPVax vaccine in a multicenter phase II study in patients with HPV+ cancers. Methods: Patients with HPV+ cancer (anal canal, head and neck, and cervical or vulvar), at locally advanced or metastatic stage, and refractory to at least one line of systemic chemotherapy are eligible. The primary end point is the objective response rate (ORR) at 4 months. Patients will receive atezolizumab every 3 weeks at a fixed dose of 1,200 mg in combination with the UCPVax vaccine at 1 mg subcutaneously. Discussion: Anti-cancer vaccines can restore cancer-immunity via the expansion and activation of tumor-specific T cells in patients lacking pre-existing anti-tumor responses. Moreover, preclinical data showed that specific TH1 CD4 T cells sustain the quality and homing of an antigen-specific CD8+ T-cell immunity. In previous clinical studies, the induction of anti-hTERT immunity was significantly correlated to survival in patients with advanced squamous anal cell carcinoma. Thus, there is a strong rational to combine an anti-cancer hTERT vaccine and an immune checkpoint inhibitor to activate and promote antitumor T-cell immunity. This pivotal proof of concept study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of a telomerase-based TH1 inducing vaccine (UCPVax) and an anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab) immunotherapy in HPV+ cancers, as well as confirming their synergic mechanism, and settling the basis for a new combination for future clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To determine the safety of performing an anastomosis after rectal cancer (RC) resection in patients with a previously treated prostate cancer (PC). Methods: Patients with a previously treated PC who underwent rectal resection from 2008 to 2018 were retrospectively included. Outcomes were compared between patients who underwent rectal resection with anastomosis (restorative surgery, RS+ group) and those with a definitive stoma (RS− group). In the RS+ group, anastomotic leak (AL) rates were assessed according to the type of reconstruction. Results: A total of 126 patients underwent rectal surgery for mid‐low RC after a previous PC treated by radiotherapy (RT) and/or radical prostatectomy. Overall, 80 patients (63%) underwent a RS and 46 patients (37%) underwent rectal surgery with a definitive stoma. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of intraoperative data, except for the type of resection with more multivisceral resection in the RS‐ group (p < 0.01). In the RS+group, a diverting stoma was performed in 74% of cases. No difference between the two groups in terms of overall morbidity was found. In the RS+group (n = 80), 17 patients (21%) experienced AL. Of these, none was observed when delayed coloanal anastomosis was performed (p = 0.16). Long‐term permanent stoma in the RS+ group was 16% (n = 13). Conclusion: Restorative surgery after resection for RC in patients with a previous history of RT and/or radical prostatectomy for PC is safe without additional morbidity. In selected patients for restorative surgery, performing delayed coloanal anastomosis may represent a promising option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Fluoropyrimidine (FP) plus platinum chemotherapy has been recently established as a second‐line (L2) preferred option in advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC) (ABC‐06 phase III trial). However, the overall survival (OS) benefit was limited and comparison with FP monotherapy was not available. Our aim was to assess the OS of patients treated with a FP monotherapy compared to a doublet with irinotecan or platinum in L2. We performed a retrospective analysis of two large multicenter prospective cohorts: a French cohort (28 centers) and an Italian cohort (9 centers). All consecutive patients with aBTC receiving FP‐based L2 after gemcitabine plus cisplatin/gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin L1 between 2003 and 2016 were included. A subgroup analysis according to performance status (PS) and an exploratory analysis according to platinum sensitivity in L1 were planned. In the French cohort (n = 351), no significant OS difference was observed between the FP monotherapy and doublet groups (median OS: 5.6 vs 6.8 months, P =.65). Stratification on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS showed similar results in PS 0‐1 and 2. Median OS was not different between FP monotherapy, platinum‐ and irinotecan‐based doublets (5.6 vs 7.1 vs 6.7 months, P =.68). Similar findings were observed in the Italian cohort (n = 174) and in the sensitivity analysis in pooled cohorts (n = 525). No L2 regimen seemed superior over others in the platinum resistant/refractory or sensitive subgroups. Our results suggest that FP monotherapy is as active as FP doublets in aBTC in L2, regardless of the patient PS and country, and could be a therapeutic option in this setting. What's new?: Advanced biliary tract carcinoma is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage, and requires first‐line chemotherapy. For those patients who go on to second‐line chemotherapy, most receive fluoropyrimidine (FP) alone or in combination. Here, the authors compared overall survival between patients given a second‐line treatment of FP monotherapy versus those given FP plus either irinotecan or platinum. They stratified patients by therapy regimen and by ECOG performance status, which is considered the best prognostic factor for second‐line treatment. They found that overall survival was comparable, whether patients received FP alone or in combination, even after controlling for performance status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Résumé: Le cancer du canal anal représente 2,7 % des cancers digestifs et son incidence est en constante augmentation. Dans la grande majorité des cas, il s'agit d'un carcinome épidermoïde, qui est associé à l'infection par HPV notamment au génotype 16 dans 90 % des cas. Environ 30-40 % des patients présentent soit une maladie métastatique au diagnostic, soit une évolution vers une maladie avancée non résécable suite à une radiochimiothérapie pour une maladie initialement localisée. La chimiothérapie systémique est donc le traitement de choix. En France, la collaboration de groupes coopérateurs a permis de mener des essais de phase II dans les cancers du canal anal avancés, aboutissant à un changement de paradigme avec une validation prospective des protocoles dans cette situation orpheline. Le premier fruit de ce travail fut l'étude Epitopes-HPV02, qui a permis de valider le schéma modifié du DCF (docétaxel, cisplatine et 5-fluoruracile) comme un nouveau standard. Plus récemment, un réseau international a également validé l'intérêt des taxanes en première ligne. En deuxième ligne, les immunothérapies anti-PD1/PD-L1 semblent prometteuses, surtout en association. Plusieurs essais cliniques sont actuellement en cours. Anal canal carcinoma represents 2.7% of gastrointestinal cancers, and its incidence is steadily increasing. Squamous cell carcinoma is by far the most frequent subtype, and is associated with HPV infection, mostly the genotype 16 in 90% of cases. Approximately 30 to 40% of patients are in an advanced stage, either with metastatic disease at diagnosis or with non resectable recurrence after chemoradiotherapy for an initially localized disease. Systemic chemotherapy is then the standard of choice. In France, a national network was settled and made possible to perform large phase II trials in advanced anal carcinomas. This is a paradigm shift with prospective validation of new strategies in this rare clinical setting thanks to the collaboration of different groups. Its first fruit was the Epitopes-HPV02 trial which validated the modified DCF (docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil) regimen as a new standard. More recently, an international network has also validated the interest of taxanes in first-line. In second-line, results with anti-PD1/PD-L1 check point inhibitors are encouraging, especially in association, and could be the next standard. Several clinical trials are ongoing [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Synchronous prostate cancer (PC) and rectal cancer (RC) is a rare clinical situation. While combining curative-intent management for both cancers can be challenging, available data for guiding the multidisciplinary strategy are lacking. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing rectal resection for a mid-low RC with synchronous PC treated at 9 tertiary-care centers between 2008 and 2018 were included. Management strategy and data on postoperative and long-term outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Overall, 25 patients underwent curative-intent RC resection combined with PC management. Nine (36%), 10 (40%) and 6 (24%) patients had low-, intermediate-, and high-risk PC, respectively. Management mostly consisted of chemoradiotherapy combined in 18 patients (72%) with either TME in 12 patients or pelvic exenteration for resection of both cancers in 6 patients. Most patients underwent RC resection using a laparoscopic approach (n = 16, 64%). Anastomosis was performed in 18 patients (72%) of whom 13 received diverting ileostomy. The complete R0 resection rate was 96% (n = 24). The overall morbidity rate was 64% (n = 16) and 5 patients (20%) experienced severe surgical morbidity of which two died within 90 days of surgery after pelvic exenteration. Among patients with anastomosis, 2 patients (11%) experienced anastomotic leak requiring surgical management. After a median follow-up of 31.2 months, 3-year OS and RFS were 80.2% (CI 95% 58.8–92.2) and 68.6% (CI 95% 42.3–84.8), respectively. Conclusions: This series is the largest to report that simultaneous curative-intent management of synchronous PC and RC is feasible and safe. Pelvic exenteration might be a better option when RC complete resection seems not achievable through TME. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: French healthcare students are required to carry out primary prevention interventions as part of the Healthcare Service by Healthcare Students (HSHS). The purpose of this study was to explore students' perceptions of preparedness to address the public's concerns about antibiotic use and how their perceptions changed after implementing their intervention., Methods: A questionnaire was sent twice during the 2020-2021 academic year to 920 multidisciplinary healthcare students (nursing, medicine, physiotherapy, pharmacy and midwifery students) enrolled in the HSHS in Franche-Comté (HSHS-FC)., Results: This study included 870/920 students (94.6%). Medical and pharmacy students were the most concerned about the issue of antimicrobial resistance. Before enrollment in the HSHS-FC, 463 of the 870 students included (53.2%) reported having sufficient knowledge about antibiotics to lead preventive interventions, reaching 87.9% (58/66) for pharmacy students. Despite this relative lack of knowledge, 77.2% of students felt confident to promote the appropriate use of antibiotics in the healthcare service context. This rate ranged from 68.0% (17/25) for midwifery students to 93.9% (62/66) for pharmacy students. Irrespective of the topic of the intervention, students significantly improved their knowledge and ability to promote antibiotic use after training in the HSHS-FC., Conclusions: Theoretical prerequisites and a feeling of concern vary widely depending on the curriculum. The HSHS-FC promotes multidisciplinary collaboration and can contribute to improving students' knowledge. The support of an expert in antimicrobial resistance may be necessary to validate the content of the interventions proposed by the students., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.)

Background: There is a strong rational of using anti-programmed cell death protein-1 and its ligand (anti-PD-1/L1) antibodies in human papillomavirus (HPV)-induced cancers. However, anti-PD-1/L1 as monotherapy induces a limited number of objective responses. The development of novel combinations in order to improve the clinical efficacy of an anti-PD-1/L1 is therefore of interest. Combining anti-PD-1/L1 therapy with an antitumor vaccine seems promising in HPV-positive (+) cancers. UCPVax is a therapeutic cancer vaccine composed of two separate peptides derived from telomerase (hTERT, human telomerase reverse transcriptase). UCPVax is being evaluated in a multicenter phase I/II study in NSCLC (non-small cell lung cancer) and has demonstrated to be safe and immunogenic. The aim of the VolATIL study is to evaluate the combination of atezolizumab (an anti-PD-L1) and UCPVax vaccine in a multicenter phase II study in patients with HPV + cancers., Methods: Patients with HPV + cancer (anal canal, head and neck, and cervical or vulvar), at locally advanced or metastatic stage, and refractory to at least one line of systemic chemotherapy are eligible. The primary end point is the objective response rate (ORR) at 4 months. Patients will receive atezolizumab every 3 weeks at a fixed dose of 1,200 mg in combination with the UCPVax vaccine at 1 mg subcutaneously., Discussion: Anti-cancer vaccines can restore cancer-immunity via the expansion and activation of tumor-specific T cells in patients lacking pre-existing anti-tumor responses. Moreover, preclinical data showed that specific T H 1 CD4 T cells sustain the quality and homing of an antigen-specific CD8 + T-cell immunity. In previous clinical studies, the induction of anti-hTERT immunity was significantly correlated to survival in patients with advanced squamous anal cell carcinoma. Thus, there is a strong rational to combine an anti-cancer hTERT vaccine and an immune checkpoint inhibitor to activate and promote antitumor T-cell immunity. This pivotal proof of concept study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of a telomerase-based T H 1 inducing vaccine (UCPVax) and an anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab) immunotherapy in HPV + cancers, as well as confirming their synergic mechanism, and settling the basis for a new combination for future clinical trials., Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT03946358., Competing Interests: CB: Research grant from Bayer and Roche, advisory board for Bayer, Sanofi, MSD. FB: Novartis, Seagen, Daiichi Sankyo, Pierre Fabre, Astra-Zeneca, Clovis. SK: reports a consulting or advisory role for Ipsen, Incyte, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi and BeiGene and has received research funding from Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim and Sanofi. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Rebucci-Peixoto, Vienot, Adotevi, Jacquin, Ghiringhelli, de la Fouchardière, You, Maurina, Kalbacher, Bazan, Meynard, Clairet, Fagnoni-Legat, Spehner, Bouard, Vernerey, Meurisse, Kim, Borg and Mansi.)

Docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) chemotherapy regimen is highly effective in advanced anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCCA), as demonstrated by the Epitopes-HPV02 study results. Here, we analyzed the impact of DCF regimen and the prognostic value of adaptive immune responses and immunosuppressive cells in SCCA patients included in two prospective studies (Epitopes-HPV01 and HPV02). The presence of T-cell responses against Human papillomavirus (HPV)16-E6/E7 and anti-telomerase (hTERT)-antigens was measured by IFNᵧ-ELISpot. Here, we showed that HPV-adaptive immune responses are increased in SCCA patients. SCCA patients also displayed enhanced circulating TH1 T-cells restricted by hTERT. Exposition to DCF increased hTERT immunity but not HPV or common viruses immune responses. Notably, the correlation of hTERT immune responses with SCCA patients' clinical outcomes highlights that hTERT is a relevant antigen in this HPV-related disease. The influence of peripheral immunosuppressive cells was investigated by flow cytometry. While both regulatory T-cells and monocytic-myeloid-derived suppressive cells (M-MDSC) accumulated in the peripheral blood of SCCA patients, only high levels of M-MDSC were negatively correlated with hTERT adaptive immune responses and predicted poor prognosis. Altogether, our results reveal that hTERT is a relevant antigen in HPV-driven SCCA disease and that M-MDSC levels influence TH1-adaptive immune responses and patients' survival.

Background: In advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (aPDAC), there is no consensual strategy for second-line chemotherapy (L2). Better discrimination of overall survival (OS) may help clinical decision-making. We aimed to predict OS from the beginning of L2 and to assess the benefit from chemotherapy among the identified risk groups., Methods: Analyses were derived from all consecutive aPDAC patients treated at Besancon University Hospital, Besancon, France, between January 2003 and December 2013 (n = 462). The association of 50 parameters with OS was evaluated using univariate and multivariable Cox analyses. Based on the final model, a prognostic nomogram and score were developed and externally validated. Patients in the external validation cohort who received L2 (n = 163) were treated at three French institutions between January 2010 and April 2016. All statistical tests were two-sided., Results: In the development cohort, 395 patients (85.5%) were eligible for L2, of which 261 (66.1%) were treated. Age, smoking status, liver metastases, performance status, pain, jaundice, ascites, duration of first-line, and type of L2 regimen were identified as independent prognostic factors for OS in L2. The score determined three groups with median OS of 11.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 9.1 to 12.9 months), 3.6 months (95% CI = 2.6 to 4.7 months), and 1.4 months (95% CI = 1.2 to 1.7 months), for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively ( P < .001). By applying the score in the population eligible for L2 but untreated, the chemotherapy benefit was statistically significant across all groups, but with a magnitude of the effect decreased statistically significantly from low- to high-risk groups ( P = .001 for treatment and risk groups interaction term). The ability of the score to discriminate OS was confirmed in the external validation cohort., Conclusions: This prognostic nomogram and score in patients with aPDAC can accurately predict OS before administration of L2 and may help clinicians in their therapeutic decisions., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)