Search

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Pädagogik is the property of Julius Beltz GmbH & Co. KG Beltz Juventa and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The 'multispecies turn' in the social sciences and humanities is informing many disciplines including animal studies, anthropology, Indigenous studies and, more recently, sociology of religion. Scholars working on multispecies relations employ various methods and methodologies, many of which are challenging modern, Western, Christian paradigms and practices that are anthropocentric and focus on logos/words/texts/beliefs. This discussion examines new and multiple ways of conducting multispecies focused research, that is critical, reflexive, embodied, affective and intuitive. It begins with an overview of the methods applied by notable scholars – Kimmerer, Tsing and Beaman – researching multispecies relations, and then includes four personal 'riotous' reflections by this article's co-authors, on their own positionality and experiences of conducting such research. The discussion concludes by identifying key challenges in research on diverse worldviews and multispecies relations, and aims to generate creative and scientific responses to further decenter anthropocentrism in academia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

J. K. Gibson-Graham's paper ''Stuffed if I Know!': Reflections on post-modern feminist social research' foreshadowed her meanderings with weak theory, and of attending not to what things are, or mean, but to 'wonder(ing) where they might go' and what they might do, in all their emergence, contradiction and multiplicity. Weak theory attends to the performativity of different encounters, processes and knowledges, in all their incompletion and multiplicity, and in following what things do, this paper suggests that weak theory is also methodological. I consider weak methodologies as an approach to methods and practices that centre and integrate the unexpected, confusing, failed and strange within the co-production of research and ways of knowing. To do this, I reflect on two inadvertent wanderings into weak methodologies in my research, and engage Puig de la Bellacasa's thinking with and dissenting within, to ponder some of the potentialities present in interruption, trouble and dis(re)orientation in research methods. Here, weak methodologies are not just about creating and participating in worlding as researchers, but also about forming an intentional posture of openness to being shaped, shifted, moved and led through research in often unanticipated ways. L'article de J. K. Gibson-Graham « 'Stuffed if I Know!': Reflections on post-modern feminist social research' » (en français « 'Du diable si j'y comprends' : réflexions sur la recherche sociale féministe post-moderne ») préfigurait ses errances autour des théories faibles, ainsi que sa préoccupation non pas pour ce que sont les choses, ou ce qu'elles signifient, mais pour « se demander où elles pourraient mener » (Stewart 2008, p. 73) et ce qu'elles pourraient faire, avec toutes leurs émergences, leurs contradictions et leurs multiplicités. La théorie faible s'occupe de la performativité d'une variété de rencontres, de processus, et de connaissances, dans toute leur incomplétude et leur multiplicité, et en suivant ce que font les choses, cet article émet l'hypothèse que la théorie faible est aussi méthodologique. J'examine les méthodologies faibles en tant qu'approche vers les méthodes et les pratiques qui focalisent et intègrent l'inattendu, le compliqué, le raté et l'étrange dans la co-production de la recherche et des mécanismes des connaissances. Pour ce faire, je me penche sur deux aventures accidentelles avec des méthodologies faibles au cœur de mes propres travaux et j'associe les concepts de thinking with (penser avec) et de dissenting within (diverger au sein) de Puig de la Bellacasa (2017), pour contempler les opportunités présentes dans les interruptions, les difficultés et les désorientations ou les réorientations dans les méthodes de recherche. Ici, les méthodologies faibles ne concernent pas seulement la création et la participation au monde de la recherche, mais aussi la composition d'une attitude délibérée d'ouverture à toute possibilité de modelage, de changement, de mouvement et de cheminement à travers la recherche par des manières souvent inattendues. El artículo de J. K. Gibson-Graham de 1994 'Stuffed if I Know!': Reflections on post-modern feminist social research ' ilustra la exploración que tiene la autora con la teoría débil y su enfoque a no lo que las cosas son o significan, sino a 'preguntarse' adónde podrían ir' y qué podrían hacer, en todo su surgimiento, contradicción y multiplicidad. La teoría débil atiende a la performatividad de diferentes encuentros, procesos y conocimientos, en toda su incompletitud y multiplicidad, y al seguir lo que hacen las cosas, este artículo sugiere que la teoría débil también es metodológica. Considero las metodologías débiles como un acercamiento a métodos y prácticas que centran e integran lo inesperado, confuso, fallido y extraño dentro de la coproducción de investigaciones y formas de conocimiento. Para hacer esto, reflexiono sobre dos exploraciones inadvertidas hacia metodologías débiles en mi investigación, e incorporo el pensamiento con y el disentimiento interno de Puig de la Bellacasa, para reflexionar sobre algunas de las potencialidades presentes en la interrupción, el problema y la des(re)orientación en métodos de investigación. Aquí, las metodologías débiles no se refieren sólo a crear y participar en el mundo como investigadores, sino también a formar una postura intencional de apertura para ser moldeado, cambiado, movido y guiado a través de la investigación de maneras a menudo imprevistas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Freedom of information requests are an important research tool yet receive comparably little methodological scrutiny relative to other methods commonly used by geographers. This article considers two methodological aspects to freedom of information requests. The first is how they operate as "live archives" that take shape as batches of files are compiled in ways that reflect search terms, negotiations over the scope of requests, bureaucratic processes, and considered judgments of researchers in response to variables both within and beyond their control. The second considers how freedom of information requests operate as a political methodology through the encounter they produce with state bureaucracies. Using examples that cut across these concerns and illuminate some of the ways that methodological scrutiny matters, the article discusses how freedom of information requests present overlapping yet distinct concerns for qualitative research on issues of reflexivity, ethics, and positionality. The methodological concerns that arise are not frequently discussed but, as with other methods, are important to understanding the limits and reach of data collection, analysis, and accessibility both for researchers and for the communities who may have interest in, or be impacted by, geographic research. Key messages: Freedom of information requests are a distinct method and require appraisal of their limits and potential.Bureaucratic procedures for acquiring information are peopled, and these relationships require reflection for how they shape data collection and use.Requests for information generate encounters with the state that are important sites of methodological consideration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

La diversité des approches théoriques et des techniques en psychothérapie est une richesse, mais elle peut parfois entraver l'élaboration d'une réflexion commune sur les psychothérapies et leur efficacité. L'objectif de cet article est de montrer que la notion d'alliance thérapeutique permet une compréhension intégrative du processus de soin psychique. Nous proposons une revue narrative sur l'alliance thérapeutique incluant la diversité des théories et des pratiques thérapeutiques. Nous prenons appui sur le modèle contextuel de Wampold (2001) et le modèle d'alliance thérapeutique proposé par Bordin en 1979. Les études que nous présentons portent principalement sur des psychothérapies individuelles auprès d'adultes, et sont majoritairement issues de la littérature internationale des cinquante dernières années. Nous explorons les implications épistémologiques et pratiques de ces études. Un pan de la recherche explore les liens entre alliance et résultats thérapeutiques, tandis qu'un autre explore l'alliance comme processus thérapeutique en soi. L'approche contextuelle et le modèle d'alliance permettent de proposer une définition de la psychothérapie qui est commune aux différents courants de pratique et offrent un cadre pour prodiguer des soins psychiques de qualité. Psychotherapy is an immensely diverse field of practice, in which multiple models and protocols coexist. This diversity can be an asset but can sometimes hinder the path toward a common understanding of what works in psychotherapy. The aim of this article is to show that the therapeutic alliance construct can provide an integrative frame of reference when it comes to understanding the psychotherapeutic process. This narrative review of the therapeutic alliance concept embraces the diversity of theories and practices in psychotherapy. We draw on the contextual model (Wampold, 2001) and the therapeutic alliance model (Bordin, 1979). The reviewed studies mainly focus on individual psychotherapy for adult patients and are drawn from the international literature over the past fifty years. We explore the epistemological and practical implications of these studies. One part of the research explores the links between alliance and psychotherapy outcomes, while another explores alliance as a therapeutic process. The contextual approach and the alliance model can be used to provide a definition of psychotherapy that is common to different schools of thought. These concepts offer a framework for quality psychological care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Arthroskopie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The aim of this article is to present a methodology for encouraging local stakeholders to cooperate on the prevention of an emerging risk. It concerns the degradation of mountain permafrost, which, with global warming, generates natural hazards (landslides, collapses, torrential lava) that create vulnerability for mountain professionals, public protection authorities and citizens living in the valleys. This methodology involves two steps. Firstly, an individual interview, based on intermediate objects (maps and real-life cases), leads the person into a reflective activity. This step prepares the way for the second step: the democratic workshop, where stakeholders discuss and exchange their needs on a regional level. The construction of this methodology, based on an interdisciplinary approach between ergonomics and geosciences, enables us to better grasp the stakes involved in the risk of permafrost degradation for those working in the field, in relation to their human activity and its evolution. It leads to a better understanding of phenomena in a given area, and to the development of preventive actions and social demand. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Pädagogik is the property of Julius Beltz GmbH & Co. KG Beltz Juventa and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revue Française de Gestion is the property of John Libbey Eurotext Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Social Anthropology / Anthropologie Sociale is the property of Berghahn Books and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Elahe Haschemi Yekani, Magdalena Nowicka und Tiara Roxanne setzen mit ihrem transdisziplinären Buch am Primat des ‚Sehens‘ und dessen Gleichsetzung mit Wissen in westlichen Kulturen an. Dabei interessieren sich die Autor*innen für die Bedeutung des Sehens für die Rassifizierung, Vergeschlechtlichung und Sexualisierung von Körpern. Sie nutzen dafür Erkenntnisse aus Disziplinen wie Kognitionswissenschaft, Psychologie, Philosophie sowie Visual Culture Studies und aus der künstlerischen Forschung. Differenz und soziale Kategorien sowie deren intersektionale Verknüpfung in Machtverhältnissen werden dabei als kulturell prädisponiert vorgestellt. Die illustrierenden Beispiele stammen wesentlich aus der Migrations- und Rassismusforschung sowie den Queer und Trans Studies und leider kaum aus der Geschlechterforschung. Das Buch mündet in ein Plädoyer für einen Visual Turn in der Intersektionalitätsforschung im transdisziplinären Dialog und mithilfe neuer, noch zu entwickelnder Methoden.

Melanie S.S. Seabrook and colleagues (Police funding and crime rates in 20 of Canada's largest municipalities: A longitudinal study, Canadian Public Policy 49(4) (2023): 383–98) have investigated the relationship between per capita police budgets and crime for 20 of Canada's largest municipalities. The authors state that there is no consistent relationship between these two variables and question the utility of increased police spending. Their questioning of increased police spending is not necessarily unjustified, particularly given the expansive research that demonstrates that investing in prevention is far more cost effective. However, we scrutinize their data and methods to make such a claim. After reproducing their results, we use more appropriate data and methods to interrogate this relationship. We find support for an association between police officers per capita and lower crime but caution against any causal connection. We discuss the implications of this relationship, if present, and alternative ways to address crime and its prevention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

L'autopsie psychologique s'est ajoutée au coffre à outils diagnostiques du médecin psychiatre depuis son invention aux États-Unis, vers la fin des années 1950. Nous nous interrogeons toutefois sur la validité scientifique de cette méthode. Pour ce faire, nous retraçons l'histoire de sa création, avant d'en souligner les failles méthodologiques et les défauts : nous soutenons, à l'instar d'autres critiques, 1) qu'il est impossible de diagnostiquer un trouble mental chez une personne décédée en interviewant des proches et des connaissances, 2) que la littérature scientifique soutenant la validité de la méthode ne démontre pas qu'il est possible de répondre au point 1 avec une rigueur scientifique minimale et 3) que l'association entre la dépression et le suicide est un artéfact introduit par les failles méthodologiques des études sur l'autopsie psychologique. Nous montrons finalement que son utilisation outrepasse aujourd'hui l'objectif visé par ses créateurs. Psychological autopsy has been added to the psychiatrist's diagnostic toolbox since his creation in the United States in the late 1950s. However, we wonder about the scientific validity of this method. Therefore, we trace the history of its creation, before pointing out the methodological flaws and defects: we maintain that 1) it is impossible to diagnose a mental disorder in a deceased person by interviewing relatives and acquaintances, 2) that the scientific literature supporting the validity of the method does not demonstrate that it is possible to respond scientifically to point 1 and 3) that the association between depression and suicide is an artifact introduced by the methodological flaws of the studies on psychological autopsy. We finally show that its use today exceeds the objective of its creators. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Forum: Qualitative Social Research / Qualitative Sozialforschung is the property of Forum Qualitative Social Research and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Forum: Qualitative Social Research / Qualitative Sozialforschung is the property of Forum Qualitative Social Research and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Cet article propose un récit d'enquête portant sur un travail de thèse de doctorat étudiant le sport dans les quartiers défavorisés. Réaliser un récit d'enquête est une manière d'engager une démarche critique et réflexive sur les expériences de recherche. Les dessous des expériences d'enquête concernent aussi bien les situations en contact direct avec les acteurs, que les phases de négociation d'accès au terrain, de préparation des rencontres ainsi que d'analyse des données. À travers ce récit d'enquête, est proposée une focale sur les contraintes de terrains "politiques" qui participent de l'autocensure des acteurs municipaux jeunesse et sports en situation d'entretien dans six villes (Île-de-France). Sont répertoriées de nombreux impacts émanant à la fois : des hiérarchies dans un système d'action organisé, des logiques de défense corporatiste, des devoirs de réserve et de discrétion professionnelle dans la fonction publique ou encore, de l'agenda politique et de ses enjeux de mise en œuvre dans une phase de reconfiguration de l'action publique. Les dessous de l'enquête et le cheminement analytique des données seront dévoilés dans le but de contribuer à formaliser les "ficelles du métier" en sciences sociales du sport à la lumière de la singularité du terrain étudié. Les stratégies de contournement des paroles contraintes et censurées apparaissent comme l'émanation conjointe d'anticipation et d'ajustements face aux difficultés inhérentes aux situations d'enquête. Mots clés: Récit d'enquête; terrains politiques; censure; méthodologie; entretiens This article offers an investigative story relating to doctoral thesis work studying sport in disadvantaged neighborhoods. Creating an investigative story is a way of engaging in a critical and reflective approach to research experiences. The underside of the survey experiences concerns both situations in direct contact with the actors, as well as the phases of negotiation of access to the field, preparation of meetings as well as data analysis. Through this investigative account, the focus is on the "political" field constraints that contribute to the self-censorship of municipal youth and sports actors in interview situations in six cities (Île-de-France). Many impacts emanating from: hierarchies in an organized action system, the logic of corporatist defense, duties of reserve and professional discretion in the public service, or even the political agenda and its challenges of implementation in a phase of reconfiguration of public action. The underside of the investigation and the analytical path of the data will be revealed with the aim of helping to formalize the "tricks of the trade" in the social sciences of sport in the light of the singularity of the field studied. Strategies for circumventing constrained and censored words appear as the joint emanation of anticipation and adjustments in the face of the difficulties inherent in investigative situations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Pädagogik is the property of Julius Beltz GmbH & Co. KG Beltz Juventa and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Pädagogik is the property of Julius Beltz GmbH & Co. KG Beltz Juventa and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Cahiers Victoriens & Edouardiens is the property of Presses Universitaires de la Mediterranee and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Die Erstellung und ggf. Veröffentlichung von Unterrichtskonzepten ist in allen Fachdidaktiken ein zentraler Aspekt universitärer Ausbildung, Forschung und diesbezüglicher Transferbemühungen sowie schulischer Praxis. Jedoch mangelt es oft an der Praxiserprobung, was die Transparenz von diesbezüglichen Publikationen, aber auch deren Validität beeinträchtigt. Um dieses Problem anzugehen, wurde das Design zur kontrollierten Evaluation von (innovativen) Unterrichtskonzepten (KEUK) entwickelt. Das Verfahren involviert zwei Lehrkräfte und Klassen bei der Erprobung eines Unterrichtskonzepts, wobei nach den Lehrversuchen eine (möglichst umfassende) Evaluierung und anschließende Revision des Konzepts erfolgt. KEUK zeichnet sich durch seine ökonomische Durchführbarkeit, klare Verständlichkeit und Anpassungsfähigkeit an unterschiedliche Forschungsanforderungen aus. Es bietet eine Möglichkeit zur Verbesserung und Validierung von Unterrichtskonzepten in den Fachdidaktiken und kann zudem einen Beitrag zur Hochschuldidaktik leisten, indem es Studierenden ein praxisnahes Experimentieren mit verschiedenen empirischen Methoden ermöglicht. Anschließbar ist KEUK an unterschiedliche Forschungsverfahren, insbesondere an Design (Based) Research bzw. Educational Design Research.

This article revisits the debate on the role of ethnography in International Relations. It primarily does this by elucidating three points of tension in the literature on ethnography in International Relations. Firstly, it tackles the challenges related to 'getting on' with ethnography after the reflexive methodological developments that have taken place within anthropology since the 1980s. Secondly, it investigates how to overcome certain matters of scale and how to conceptualise the 'international' methodologically, or more specifically, ethnographically. When looking at issues that somehow exist and operate on the international scale, the ethnographic task of immersion in local scenes does sometimes seem like an ill-suited approach. However, I argue, this problematisation is dependent on a certain methodological understanding of what the international is. I attempt to formulate an alternative methodological approach that takes seriously the idea that international relations always can be accessed locally. This paper suggests that one of the main solutions to the obstacle of scale is methodologically abandon the imaginary of totalities as a higher level. In this way, ethnography can enable important understandings of social relations that exist across scales of local and global. Repenser le rapport entre l'ethnographie et les relations internationales [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article presents a methodological approach for studying the press in the Caribbean region of Costa Rica between 1884 and 1950. It emphasizes the importance of considering the communicative circuit of newspapers, from their production to their arrival to the reader. It is mentioned that the Atlantic region of Costa Rica was multiethnic and multicultural, with a predominantly Afro-descendant population in 1900. There were several attempts to establish newspapers in the area, but the only successful one was La Voz del Atlántico, which was in circulation from 1934 to 1946. The study proposes a methodology for analyzing the history of the press in the Costa Rican Caribbean, considering the social, political, economic, and technological context. The importance of regional media in the construction of identities and the development of the region is highlighted. [Extracted from the article]

Copyright of Synthesis Philosophica is the property of Croatian Philosophical Society and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Qualitative Forschung (ZQF) is the property of Verlag Barbara Budrich GmbH and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Forum: Qualitative Social Research / Qualitative Sozialforschung is the property of Forum Qualitative Social Research and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of ESSACHESS is the property of ESSACHESS and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Mit unserem empirischen Beispiel aus der sogenannten Deradikalisierungsarbeit und Extremismusprävention bieten wir einen weiteren Anwendungsfall für eine trans-sequentielle Analyse. Das formative Objekt ist das Nicht-Eintreten eines sicherheitsbehördlichen Falls. Anhand von Auszügen aus Feldnotizen zeigen wir, dass sich die Logik des Objektes-im-Werden, an dem hier gearbeitet wird, auch auf das Nicht-Eintreten übertragen lässt. Ein solches formatives Objekt löst sich von Schriftlichkeit. Wir verfolgen das vor allem mündlich hergestellte, offen und vorläufig bleibende Objekt und fragen dann nach einer Anpassung des analytischen Vorgehens. Eine anschlussfähige Option bietet eine situationsanalytische Perspektive. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cet article rend compte d’une recherche-action conduite avec les concepteurs d’une IA émotionnelle qui tentaient de s’éloigner du modèle de capture des technologies affectives. Un tel déplacement implique de rattacher une approche critique et des pratiques d’intervention. Saisir et faire agir forment un couple qui vient compléter une éthique des devoirs ou des conséquences, non plus en aidant les concepteurs à arbitrer entre des principes ou des calculs, mais en leur offrant de repartir de leurs expériences, et celles de leurs usagers, pour concevoir une innovation socialement désirable. Cette promesse est rendue possible par une éthique en situations, un cadrage opérationnel permettant de saisir, par la voie d’une ethnographie sensible, ce qui est à disposition dans les situations vécues par les usagers et par les concepteurs ; de mettre à leur disposition, par des approches participatives, des objets intermédiaires facilitant la transition vers des imaginaires autres ; et de se tenir à disposition pour des médiations nouvelles, en s’appuyant sur des méthodes créatives et projectives.

Das von Fritz SCHÜTZE im Rahmen der Narrationsanalyse eingeführte Textsortenkonzept spielt heute in verschiedenen Interviewverfahren im deutschsprachigen Raum eine wichtige Rolle, um eine bestimmte methodologisch präferierte Qualität von Äußerungen zu erzeugen und entsprechende Passagen im Zuge der Auswertung zu identifizieren. Der anhaltenden Popularität des Konzepts stehen jedoch drei grundlegende Problematiken der Bestimmung gegenüber: 1. die Vernachlässigung des interaktiven Charakters der Textsortenproduktion, 2. die begrenzte Aussagekraft formalsprachlicher Marker und 3. Unklarheiten bezüglich der Textsortentaxonomie. Diese Problematiken rühren daher, dass es seit SCHÜTZEs (und KALLMEYERs) maßgeblichen Arbeiten in den 1970er und 1980er Jahren innerhalb des deutschsprachigen Methodendiskurses kaum weiterführende systematische Arbeiten zu Textsorten und ihrer Bestimmung gegeben hat und einschlägige Beiträge aus der Gesprächslinguistik weithin ignoriert wurden. In diesem methodologisch orientierten Beitrag machen wir einen empirisch erprobten Vorschlag zur Adressierung dieser Probleme durch Rückgriff auf das in der Interviewforschung bislang nicht rezipierte gesprächsanalytische Beschreibungs- und Analyseverfahren "Globalität und Lokalität in der Organisation beidseitig-konstruierter Einheiten" (GLOBE). Mit dieser Weiterentwicklung der Methode wird die Textsortenbestimmung für eine Vielzahl von Forschungskontexten auch jenseits narrativer Erhebungsformate fruchtbar.

In diesem Beitrag reflektiere ich den partizipativen Forschungsstil im Verbundprojekt "SchutzNorm: Schutzkonzepte in der Kinder- und Jugendarbeit. Normalitätskonstruktionen von Sexualität und Gewalt unter Jugendlichen" (2018-2021) hinsichtlich methodologischer und methodischer Aspekte. Einleitend werden aktuelle deutschsprachige Debatten zum partizipativen Forschen dargelegt, mit theoretischen Perspektiven aus der Wissenssoziologie flankiert und mit Grundannahmen einer postkolonialen Pädagogik nach Paulo FREIRE verbunden. Sodann erfolgen methodologische Reflexionen zu den Beteiligungssituationen der partizipativen Jugendforschung "SchutzNorm" auf Verbundebene im Allgemeinen und zum Peer-Forschungsprozess in Forschungswerkstätten im Teilprojekt "Internationale Jugendarbeit" im Besonderen.

Convening is a mode of practical theology inquiry that stages a counter-performance to the spectacle of prominent logics that order ecclesial life: brand Christianity, silos, and competition. Three parts organize this argument: Part I sets the stage with a preliminary portrait of convening, noting the contextual features of this inquiry. Part II introduces Augustine's City of God as an interpretive lens to understand convening as a counter-performance to prominent spectacles on display. Part III redescribes convening by combining Augustine's theological vision of spectacle, performance, latreia, and pilgrimage with the introductory portrait in order to perform what is possible when people of faith gather for collective inquiry. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Forum: Qualitative Social Research / Qualitative Sozialforschung is the property of Forum Qualitative Social Research and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Vie et Sciences de l'Entreprise is the property of ANDESE and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Cette réflexion rend compte d’une de ces étapes, à savoir : les opérations du terrain de la recherche et la logique d’analyse des faits, lesquelles déterminent la portée des résultats. Elle fait la restitution des paradigmes, des moyens de connaissance et d'analyse des phénomènes sociaux qui entourent l’élaboration et la mise en œuvre des Politiques Publiques inspirées des institutions du Breton Wood, lesquels constituent l’essentiel de la recherche que nous avons mené dans six provinces de la RDC, dans le cadre de notre dissertation doctorale et tels qu’ils ont été appréhendés par la démarche empirique. Car, les paradigmes, les moyens de connaissance, … régissent le choix des stratégies et des instruments de collecte des données qui servent à vérifier empiriquement les théories.

Damit durch Forschung Neues hervorgebracht wird, muss Gewohntes irritiert werden. Dabei stellt sich die Frage, wie Wissenschaftler*innen im Prozess der Forschung mit Irritationen umgehen und welche Bedeutung diesen im Erkenntnisprozess zukommt. Ausgangspunkt unseres Beitrages bildet die These, dass es in der empirischen Sozialforschung zwar laufend zu Irritationen kommt, sie jedoch in ihrer Bedeutung für den Erkenntnisgewinn noch zu wenig systematisch ausgeleuchtet sind. Deshalb widmen wir uns dem Umgang mit ihnen am Beispiel ethnografischer Forschungsstrategien, mit denen sie gesucht und erzeugt, aber auch vermieden werden können, um das Potenzial eines reflexiven Umgangs mit Irritationen für die Gewinnung wissenschaftlicher Erkenntnisse auszuloten. Als empirisches Material dienen uns hierfür ethnografische Studien im Feld der Erziehungswissenschaft, welchen wir uns im Modus einer reflexiven Sekundäranalyse nähern. Ziel des Beitrags ist eine systematisierende Darstellung von Momenten der Irritation in qualitativ-interpretativen Forschungsprozessen sowie die Diskussion ihrer Bedeutung, Potenziale und Grenzen.

This article relates the experience of a doctoral thesis in economics conducted with three cooperatives using an original approach: a full participatory action research supported by reasoning inspired by pragmatist philosophy. Associating researchers and actors, action research (AR) proves to be relevant to respond to contemporary issues of social innovation and ecological transition, through the coproduction of dual knowledge (scientific and practical). In the present case, its implementation by a researcher-employee-member of a cooperative invites us to study its epistemological and methodological dimensions. Which research approach should be developed to produce new scientifi- cally proven knowledge while supporting cooperative actions? This article is a reflective account of experimentations, and aims to provide tools for the implementation of participatory AR in the social and solidarity economy by actor researchers and researcher practitioners, by analyzing its contributions and limitations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Issues in Ethnology Anthropology is the property of Issues in Ethnology Anthropology and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Contemporary Journal of African Studies is the property of Institute of African Studies and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)