Search

Artificial Intelligence has emerged as a breakthrough in many fields including medicine and dentistry where new approaches can be employed to solve challenging decision making processes faced in the dental field. Artificial intelligence can be used as a decision support mechanism to solve the increasing population and consequently the increasing dental treatment needs. It also assists dentists in diagnosis and treatment planning stages that require expert opinion. This mini-review covers some of the recent studies in this area and envisions future directions on the use of machine learning in dental problems.

Human microbiota refers to the trillions of microorganisms that inhabit our bodies and have been discovered to have a substantial impact on human health and disease. By sampling the microbiota, it is possible to generate massive quantities of data for analysis using Machine Learning algorithms. In this study, we employed several modern Machine Learning techniques to predict Inflammatory Bowel Disease using raw sequence data. The dataset was obtained from NCBI preprocessed graph representations and converted into a structured form. Seven well-known Machine Learning frameworks, including Random Forest, Support Vector Machines, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Light Gradient Boosting Machine, Gaussian Naïve Bayes, Logistic Regression, and k-Nearest Neighbor, were used. Grid Search was employed for hyperparameter optimization. The performance of the Machine Learning models was evaluated using various metrics such as accuracy, precision, fscore, kappa, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Additionally, Mc Nemar’s test was conducted to assess the statistical significance of the experiment. The data was constructed using k-mer lengths of 3, 4 and 5. The Light Gradient Boosting Machine model overperformed over other models with 67.24%, 74.63% and 76.47% accuracy for k-mer lengths of 3, 4 and 5, respectively. The LightGBM model also demonstrated the best performance in each metric. The study showed promising results predicting disease from raw sequence data. Finally, Mc Nemar’s test results found statistically significant differences between different Machine Learning approaches.

Data from omics studies have been used for prediction and classification of various diseases in biomedical and bioinformatics research. In recent years, Machine Learning (ML) algorithms have been used in many different fields related to healthcare systems, especially for disease prediction and classification tasks. Integration of molecular omics data with ML algorithms has offered a great opportunity to evaluate clinical data. RNA sequence (RNA-seq) analysis has been emerged as the gold standard for transcriptomics analysis. Currently, it is being used widely in clinical research. In our present work, RNA-seq data of extracellular vesicles (EV) from healthy and colon cancer patients are analyzed. Our aim is to develop models for prediction and classification of colon cancer stages. Five different canonical ML and Deep Learning (DL) classifiers are used to predict colon cancer of an individual with processed RNA-seq data. The classes of data are formed on the basis of both colon cancer stages and cancer presence (healthy or cancer). The canonical ML classifiers, which are k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN), Logistic Model Tree (LMT), Random Tree (RT), Random Committee (RC), and Random Forest (RF), are tested with both forms of the data. In addition, to compare the performance with canonical ML models, One-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network (1-D CNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Bidirectional LSTM (BiLSTM) DL models are utilized. Hyper-parameter optimizations of DL models are constructed by using genetic meta-heuristic optimization algorithm (GA). The best accuracy in cancer prediction is obtained with RC, LMT, and RF canonical ML algorithms as 97.33%. However, RT and kNN show 95.33% performance. The best accuracy in cancer stage classification is achieved with RF as 97.33%. This result is followed by LMT, RC, kNN, and RT with 96.33%, 96%, 94.66%, and 94%, respectively. According to the results of the experiments with DL algorithms, the best accuracy in cancer prediction is obtained with 1-D CNN as 97.67%. BiLSTM and LSTM show 94.33% and 93.67% performance, respectively. In classification of the cancer stages, the best accuracy is achieved with BiLSTM as 98%. 1-D CNN and LSTM show 97% and 94.33% performance, respectively. The results reveal that both canonical ML and DL models may outperform each other for different numbers of features.