Search

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has changed how processes are developed, and decisions are made in the agricultural area replacing manual and repetitive processes with automated and more efficient ones. This study presents the application of deep learning techniques to detect and segment weeds in agricultural crops by applying models with different architectures in the analysis of images captured by an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). This study contributes to the computer vision field by comparing the performance of the You Only Look Once (YOLOv8n, YOLOv8s, YOLOv8m, and YOLOv8l), Mask R-CNN (with framework Detectron2), and U-Net models, making public the dataset with aerial images of soybeans and beans. The models were trained using a dataset consisting of 3021 images, randomly divided into test, validation, and training sets, which were annotated, resized, and increased using the Roboflow application interface. Evaluation metrics were used, which included training efficiency (mAP50 and mAP50-90), precision, accuracy, and recall in the model's evaluation and comparison. The YOLOv8s variant achieved higher performance with an mAP50 of 97%, precision of 99.7%, and recall of 99% when compared to the other models. The data from this manuscript show that deep learning models can generate efficient results for automatic weed detection when trained with a well-labeled and large set. Furthermore, this study demonstrated the great potential of using advanced object segmentation algorithms in detecting weeds in soybean and bean crops. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In addition to being an important instrument in the search for increasingly greater productivity, agricultural production with adequate use of irrigation systems significantly minimizes the impact on water resources. To meet high productivity and yield, as well as industrial quality, a series of studies on sugarcane cultivation are necessary. Despite being able to adapt to drought, sugarcane is still a crop highly dependent on irrigation to guarantee the best quality standards. Our study aimed to analyze the agronomic performance and technological attributes of two sugarcane cultivars, evaluating the vegetative and productive pattern, as well as the industrial quality of the cultivars RB92579 and SP80–1816, which were cultivated under split-irrigation management in the Sugarcane Research Unit of IF Goiano—Campus Ceres, located in the state of Goiás in the Central-West region of Brazil. A self-propelled sprinkler irrigation system (IrrigaBrasil) was used, duly equipped with Twin 120 Komet sprinklers (Fremon, USA). The cultivars were propagated vegetatively and planted in 0.25 m deep furrows with 1.5 m between rows. The experiment was conducted in a completely randomized design (CRD), with a bifactorial split-plot scheme (5 × 2), with four replications, where the experimental plots were subjected to one of the following five split-irrigation management systems: 00 mm + 00 mm; 20 mm + 40 mm; 30 mm + 30 mm; 40 mm + 20 mm; or 60 mm + 00 mm. At 60 and 150 days after planting (DAP), the following respective irrigation management systems were applied: 00 mm + 00 mm and 20 mm + 40 mm. Biometric and technological attributes, such as plant height (PH) and stem diameter (SD), were evaluated in this case at 30-day intervals, starting at 180 DAP and ending at 420 DAP. Measurements of soluble solids content (°Brix), apparent sucrose content (POL), fiber content (Fiber), juice purity (PZA), broth POL (BP), reducing sugars (RS), and total recoverable sugars (TRS) were made by sampling stems at harvest at 420 DAP. RB92579 showed total recoverable sugar contents 11.89% and 8.86% higher than those recorded for SP80–1816 under split-irrigation with 40 mm + 20 mm and 60 mm + 00 mm, respectively. Shoot productivity of RB92579 reached 187.15 t ha−1 under split-irrigation with 60 mm + 00 mm, which was 42.16% higher than the shoot productivity observed for SP80–1816. Both cultivars showed higher qualitative and quantitative indices in treatments that applied higher volumes of water in the initial phase of the culture, coinciding with the dry season. Sugarcane cultivar RB92579 showed a better adaptation to the prevailing conditions in the study than the SP80–1816 cultivar. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Integrating advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) with traditional agricultural practices has changed how activities are developed in agriculture, with the aim of automating manual processes and improving the efficiency and quality of farming decisions. With the advent of deep learning models such as convolutional neural network (CNN) and You Only Look Once (YOLO), many studies have emerged given the need to develop solutions to problems and take advantage of all the potential that this technology has to offer. This systematic literature review aims to present an in-depth investigation of the application of AI in supporting the management of weeds, plant nutrition, water, pests, and diseases. This systematic review was conducted using the PRISMA methodology and guidelines. Data from different papers indicated that the main research interests comprise five groups: (a) type of agronomic problems; (b) type of sensor; (c) dataset treatment; (d) evaluation metrics and quantification; and (e) AI technique. The inclusion (I) and exclusion (E) criteria adopted in this study included: (I1) articles that obtained AI techniques for agricultural analysis; (I2) complete articles written in English; (I3) articles from specialized scientific journals; (E1) articles that did not describe the type of agrarian analysis used; (E2) articles that did not specify the AI technique used and that were incomplete or abstract; (E3) articles that did not present substantial experimental results. The articles were searched on the official pages of the main scientific bases: ACM, IEEE, ScienceDirect, MDPI, and Web of Science. The papers were categorized and grouped to show the main contributions of the literature to support agricultural decisions using AI. This study found that AI methods perform better in supporting weed detection, classification of plant diseases, and estimation of agricultural yield in crops when using images captured by Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). Furthermore, CNN and YOLO, as well as their variations, present the best results for all groups presented. This review also points out the limitations and potential challenges when working with deep machine learning models, aiming to contribute to knowledge systematization and to benefit researchers and professionals regarding AI applications in mitigating agronomic problems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Agricultural Research in the Tropics / Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical is the property of Pesquisa Agropecuaria Tropical and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This study aimed to verify the effects of leaf application of zinc (Zn) on the growth, physiology, yield, and biofortification of snap beans. The experiment was carried out in a greenhouse, in a completely randomized design, with five doses of zinc (0, 100, 200, 300, and 400 mg L−1). The leaf application of zinc was carried out at the vegetative stage V3 (third leaves). Biometric, physiological, and yield evaluations occurred at stages R5 (flowering) and R8 (harvest). The chlorophyll of plants with zinc is 36% higher with the application of 400 mg L−1 in R8. Foliar fertilization reduced the transpiration around 41%; and it increased the temperature and photosynthetic rate at 5.2% and 16.2%, respectively. The zinc concentration increases up resulted in an increase of 85 and 942% of zinc accumulation in the snap bean plant at the R5 stage. The 100 mg L−1 dose increased crop yield by 8.4% compared to the control treatment. Higher doses can reduce productivity by up to 17% when 400 mg L−1 of Zn is applied. Foliar application of zinc is efficient in promoting an increase in the concentration and accumulation of Zn in the leaves in the stage R5, but at the harvest stage there is no influence of fertilization on the levels and accumulations of zinc in the plant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]