Search

Objective: This post-marketing surveillance (PMS) was conducted to evaluate the incidence of adverse events with nivolumab in patients with unresectable, advanced or recurrent malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) that had progressed after first-line chemotherapy and to identify factors that potentially affected its safety in real-world clinical practice., Methods: Patients who had not received nivolumab previously were registered between November 2018 and February 2021. Nivolumab was given intravenously 240 mg every 2 weeks or 480 mg every 4 weeks. Patients were followed up for 6 months after treatment initiation. Information on patient characteristics, treatment status, and adverse events was collected., Results: This PMS enrolled 124 patients, involving 48 sites across Japan. At 6 months, nivolumab therapy was ongoing in 35.5% of patients (44/124) and had been discontinued in 64.5% (80/124). The overall incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was 40.3%; the incidence of Grade 3 or higher TRAEs was 12.9%. The pattern of TRAEs based on System Organ Class categories was generally consistent with those seen in the Japanese phase II MERIT study. The most common Grade 3 or higher TRAEs were interstitial lung disease (2.4%), lung disorder, and diarrhea (each 1.6%). The incidence of TRAEs was significantly higher in inpatients or patients who had good PS, high bodyweight, high body mass index, or autoimmune diseases than in those without these characteristics., Conclusion: The post-marketing incidence of TRAEs with nivolumab in patients with MPM has been evaluated, and no new safety signals were identified compared to the phase II clinical trial in Japan., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: Previous studies showed opposite effects of NOTCH1 and NOTCH2 on mesothelioma cell survival under hypoxia. Mechanisms underlying these effects are not still clear and this pathway plays a key role in angiogenesis and cancer stem cells (CSCs) self-renewal processes., Purpose: In this study we evaluated whether NOTCH1, NOTCH2 copy number alterations (CNAs) might predict prognosis of patients with pleural mesothelioma (PM) and if the modulation of this pathway might target CSCs, potentiating pemetrexed activity, also in hypoxic conditions., Methods: Recurrent CNAs were determined by high-resolution whole-genome sequencing from paraffin-embedded samples of a "discovery cohort" (26 patients treated with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy). Prognostic CNAs were validated by PCR gene copy-number and expression analyses in the "discovery" and in two independent "validation" cohorts of pemetrexed-treated and untreated patients (N = 45 and N = 40). Functional analyses of emerging genes were performed through siRNA in different subpopulation of PM cells, growing under hypoxia., Results: A copy number gain of NOTCH2 was observed in 50% of patients with progressive disease and its overexpression correlated with a worse prognosis in both pemetrexed-treated and untreated-patients' cohorts. Conversely, losses of PTP4A3 correlated with clinical benefit, while patients with overexpression of both NOTCH2 and PTP4A3 had the worse prognosis. Moreover, NOTCH2 silencing through siRNA in vitro reduced migration, enhancing apoptosis of PM cells, while the PTP4A3 inhibitor BR-1 overcame pemetrexed resistance in PM cells characterized by high NOTCH2/PTP4A3 expression., Conclusions: NOTCH2 and PTP4A3 alterations are associated with clinical outcomes in pemetrexed-treated PM patients. The inhibition of NOTCH pathway may be exploited to eradicate CSCs and improve patients' survival., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Aim: To evaluate the real-world treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with pleural mesothelioma (PM) in the era of immunotherapy., Methods: This retrospective audit included patients with PM diagnosed within three tertiary referral centers in Queensland, Australia from January 2017 to July 2023. Patient and treatment characteristics and outcomes were recorded. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Kaplan-Meier survival method., Results: A total of 90 patients were included: 84% were male, the median age was 75 years (range 70-79) and 85% had baseline Eastern Group Cooperative Group of 0-1. Subtypes included 54% epithelioid, 17% biphasic, 12% sarcomatoid, and 17% unspecified/unknown. First-line treatment was received by 57/90 patients (63%) and 33/90 patients (37%) received the best supportive care (BSC). Chemotherapy was most used (63%) overall, but first-line immunotherapy was more commonly used since ipilimumab/nivolumab was reimbursed by the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in July 2021. After first-line treatment, only 40% received second-line treatment and 60% received BSC. 12-month overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival for all patients were 53% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 43-65) and 25% (95% CI 15-40) respectively. 12-month OS was 72%, 64%, and 29% for immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and BSC, respectively. There was no significant difference in survival between chemotherapy and immunotherapy (hazard ratio 1.28, 95% CI: 0.65-2.5, p = 0.5)., Conclusion: In our unselected real-world cohort, both chemotherapy and immunotherapy are active against PM, but the prognosis remains guarded. There remains a need for better treatment options, especially in the first-line setting. Enrolment in clinical trials is crucial to improving outcomes in this debilitating disease., (© 2024 The Author(s). Asia‐Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background: The phase 3 CheckMate-743 trial demonstrated a prolonged overall survival (OS) benefit with nivolumab plus ipilimumab over chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with unresectable pleural mesothelioma (PM). However, given that Latin American (LATAM) patients were notably underrepresented in this trial, we retrospectively assessed the effectiveness and safety of this regimen in this population., Methods: This retrospective study included patients from 15 centers in LATAM with unresectable or metastatic PM treated with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in a real-world data (RWD) scenario. Demographic, clinicopathological characteristics, and safety data were collected from medical charts. Progression-free survival (PFS), and OS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: From June 2017, and January 2024 96 patients were included: epithelioid 78% (n = 75), 81% were ECOG 0-1 (n = 78). With a median follow-up of 24.1 months, median PFS and OS were 8 months (95% CI, 6.6-9.4), and 22 months (95% CI, 18.9-25), respectively. No statistical difference in OS was observed between epithelioid versus nonepithelioid histology (median 23 months vs. 19 months, respectively; P = .29). Treatment efficacy was also consistent among different clinical subgroups. Any and grade 3-4 adverse events were found in 43.1% (n = 28), and 18.5% (n = 12) of patients, respectively. Remarkably, no OS impact was observed in patients who had dose delay or treatment discontinuation due to immune-related adverse events, and those who experienced any adverse event., Conclusions: This multicenter RWD study demonstrated the clinically meaningful benefit of first-line ipilimumab and nivolumab in LATAM patients with unresectable or metastatic PM, and data is consistent with previous trial findings., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Malignant mesothelioma is an aggressive cancer with poor prognosis. Programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and its ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have recently presented as a viable option in some first line but primarily as a second-line treatment of advanced-stage malignant mesothelioma (asMM). Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the safety and efficacy of PD-1/L-1 ICIs in advanced-stage malignant mesothelioma., Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched for all studies assessing the safety and efficacy of anti PD-1/PD-L1 agents. Primary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Secondary outcomes were median progression free (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS). Safety outcomes were treatment- (TRAEs) and immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to pool medians and to derive event rates., Results: A total of 15 studies were included with total of 1064 asMM patients. ORR and DCR were 16% and 57%, respectively. A pooled mPFS was 4.53 (CI: 3.40-5.65) and mOS was 10.51 (CI: 9.03-12.00). Overall TRAEs had an event rate of 0.69 (0.50-0.83) whereas IRAEs had an event rate of 0.28 (0.15-0.46). There were no significant differences between pembrolizumab, nivolumab primarily, and avelumab subgroups for all the outcomes. Additionally, meta-regression found no covariate to be a significant factor in ORR and DCR., Conclusion: In this meta-analysis we found that anti-PD1/PD-L1 treatment could be useful in pretreated asMM as they had at least comparable or greater mPFS, mOS, ORR, and DCR than other second-line agents currently being used., Registration Number: This systematic review was registered at PROSPERO prior to the literature search, CRD42023442350., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Malignant mesothelioma is a rare highly invasive tumour originating from the mesothelial cells of the pleura, peritoneum and pericardium. Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is the most common type in all malignant mesothelioma. The onset of MPM is associated with exposure to asbestos and it can have an incubation period of up to 40 years. The incidence of MPM has been increasing worldwide in recent years, so more attention has been focused on its diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Activating mutations, amplifications and fusions/rearrangements of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase receptor tyrosine kinase ( ALK ) gene are commonly seen in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. However, it is rare in MPM. This current case report describes a female patient with advanced MPM with an ALK gene fusion mutation. In this particular case, treatment with crizotinib demonstrated some initial efficacy, which suggests that this might be a promising strategy for patients with advanced MPM with an ALK gene mutation. This required further research and evaluation in the future., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestThe authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is an aggressive cancer with limited treatment options. In particular, the frequent loss of tumor suppressors, a key oncogenic driver of the disease that is therapeutically intractable, has hampered the development of targeted cancer therapies. Here, we interrogate the PM genome using CRISPR-mediated gene editing to systematically uncover PM cell susceptibilities and provide an evidence-based rationale for targeted cancer drug discovery. This analysis has allowed us to identify with high confidence numerous known and novel gene dependencies that are surprisingly highly enriched for non-oncogenic pathways involved in response to various stress stimuli, in particular DNA damage and transcriptional dysregulation. By integrating genomic analysis with a series of in vitro and in vivo functional studies, we validate and prioritize several non-oncogene addictions conferred by CDK7, CHK1, HDAC3, RAD51, TPX2, and UBA1 as targetable vulnerabilities, revealing previously unappreciated aspects of PM biology. Our findings support the growing consensus that stress-responsive non-oncogenic signaling plays a key role in the initiation and progression of PM and provide a functional blueprint for the development of unprecedented targeted therapies to combat this formidable disease., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive cancer with a poor prognosis and the identification of novel druggable targets is urgently needed. In previous work, we identified 15 deregulated genes highly expressed in MPM tissues and correlated with a poor prognosis. Here, we validated these findings on an independent dataset of 211 MPM patients (EGA, EGAD00001001915) and on a panel of MPM cell lines. Furthermore, we carried out in vitro gene silencing followed by proliferation, cytotoxicity, caspase, and migration assays to define whether these targets could be cancer-driver genes. We ended up with three novel candidates (i.e., BAG2, MAD2L1, and MDK), whose encoded proteins could be exploited as druggable targets. Moreover, of novelty, immunohistochemistry analysis on tissues revealed that the overexpression of BAG2 and MAD2L1 could differentiate MPM from RMP patients. Furthermore, when we tested Neratinib (an inhibitor of MAD2L1) and iMDK (an inhibitor of MDK) we found that they are effective on MPM cells, in part phenocopying the effects of MAD2L1 and MDK gene silencing. In summary, in the present work, we report that BAG2, MAD2L1, and MDK are bona fide cancer-driver genes for MPM worth of further studies., Competing Interests: Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics approval and consent to participate The collection and analysis of human tissue samples were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and with approvals by the Ethical Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark (Protocol No. H32011135-57379) and the Danish Data Protection Agency (Protocol No. DT2016414917), as previously described [15]. Additionally, the Danish Registry for Use of Tissue was checked to ensure that patients included in the study had not refused the usage of their tissue samples for research purposes., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

This review delves into the intricate landscape of pleural mesothelioma (PM), emphasizing the need for nuanced therapeutic strategies. While platinum-based chemotherapy remains a cornerstone, the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), notably through the Checkmate 743 trial, has reshaped treatment paradigms. Challenges persist due to patient heterogeneity and a lack of specific biomarkers. Targeting genotypic and phenotypic alterations emerges as a promising avenue, demanding precision oncology in this rare disease. CDKN2A loss, prevalent in PM, may respond to CDK4/6 inhibitors. Defects in MMR and HR suggest tailored approaches with ICI or PARP inhibitors, respectively. Ongoing trials explore novel inhibitors and promising targets like mesothelin. Implementing these strategies requires overcoming challenges in patient selection, combination therapies, biomarker identification, and cost considerations. Collaboration is crucial for transforming these insights into impactful clinical interventions, heralding the era of personalized and precision medicine for PM., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The 2018 ASCO pleural mesothelioma (PM) treatment guideline states that "a trial of expectant observation may be offered" in patients with asymptomatic inoperable epithelioid mesothelioma with low disease burden. The aim of our analysis was to evaluate clinical characteristics and outcomes in PM-patients managed with initial observation and deferred treatment initiation., Methods: We retrospectively collected clinicodemograhic and outcome data of patients with inoperable PM. Patients were assigned to 2 treatment decision groups: decision to start immediate systemic treatment (Immediate Treatment Group) versus observation and deferring treatment (Deferred Treatment group)., Results: Of 222 patients with advanced PM, systemic treatment was started immediately in the majority of patients (189, 85%; immediate group); treatment was deferred in 33 (15%) patients (deferred group); systemic therapy was chemotherapy-based in 91% and 79% respectively. Patients in the deferred group were older (70 vs 67 years, p = .05), less likely to have stage IV disease (28% vs. 51%, p = .08) and more often had epithelioid histology (90% vs. 70%, p = .03). Nineteen patients (58%) in the deferred group eventually received treatment. With a median follow-up time of 10.9 months median overall survival (OS) in the entire cohort was 12.4 months and was significantly longer in the deferred group (20.6 months vs. 11.5 months, p = .02). No difference in median progression-free survival (PFS) in first-line treatment between groups was seen (5.4 and 5.3 months)., Conclusion: This real-world analysis suggests that deferral of systemic therapy and close observation may not impact OS or physician-assessed PFS in selected PM-patients., Competing Interests: Disclosures SS: Grants (institutional): AstraZeneca, Janssen, BMS; Advisory boards (institutional): MSD, Merck, BMS; AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Janssen, Roche; Travel support: Takeda, MSD, Amgen and Roche. PB: Advisory Boards: Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Abbvie, Astra Zeneca (no financial remuneration), Mirati (no financial remuneration), RAPT Therapeutics (no financial remuneration); Honorarium: Merck, Eli Lilly. GL: Advisory (institutional): Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Takeda, Pfizer, Hoffman La Roche, Abbvie, EMD Serono, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Jazz. Grants(institutional): Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, AstraZeneca. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Malignant mesothelioma, a highly aggressive cancer that primarily affects the serosal membranes, has limited therapeutic options, particularly for cavitary tumors, such as peritoneal and pleural malignant mesothelioma. Intracavitary administration of a radioimmunoconjugate to locally target mesothelioma cancer cells has been proposed as a treatment. CD146, upregulated in mesothelioma but not in healthy tissues, is a promising therapeutic target. This study characterized CD146 expression and binding/internalization kinetics of the CD146-targeting antibody OI-3 coupled with 212 Pb ( 212 Pb-TCMC-OI-3) in human mesothelioma cells. Flow cytometry showed that both chimeric (chOI-3) and murine (mOI-3) antibodies rapidly bound and internalized within 1-6 h in MSTO-211H cells. 212 Pb-TCMC-chOI-3 exhibited 3.1- to 13.7-fold and 3.1- to 8.5-fold increased internalized 212 Pb and 212 Bi atoms per cell at 2 and 24 h, respectively, compared to isotype control, underscoring enhanced internalization efficiency. Intraperitoneal administration of 212 Pb-TCMC-mOI-3 to mice with intraperitoneal MSTO-211H xenografts improved median survival by a ratio of 1.3 compared to non-binding 212 Pb-TCMC-mIgG1. The ability of 212 Pb-TCMC-mOI-3 to target and inhibit the growth of intraperitoneal mesothelioma xenografts supports targeted radionuclide therapy's efficacy for metastatic peritoneal mesothelioma. This study highlights the potential of localized CD146-targeted radioimmunotherapy for malignant mesothelioma, offering a new avenue for improving patient outcomes., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The hemagglutinating virus of Japan envelope (HVJ-E) is an inactivated Sendai virus particle with antitumor effect and inducing antitumor immunity. However, its dosage and efficacy have not been verified. We conducted a phase I clinical study on chemotherapy-resistant malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) aiming to determine the recommended dosage for a phase II study through dose-limiting toxicity and evaluate HVJ-E's preliminary efficacy. HVJ-E was administered intratumorally and subcutaneously to the patients with chemotherapy-resistant MPM. While no serious adverse events occurred, known adverse events of HVJ-E were observed. In the preliminary antitumor efficacy using modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) criteria, three low-dose patients exhibited progressive disease, while all high-dose patients achieved stable disease, yielding disease control rates (DCRs) of 0% and 100%, respectively. Furthermore, the dose-dependent effect of HVJ-E revealed on DCR modified by RECIST and the baseline changes in target lesion size (by CT and SUL-peak; p < 0.05). Comparing targeted lesions receiving intratumoral HVJ-E with non-injected ones, while no clear difference existed at the end of the study, follow-up cases suggested stronger antitumor effects with intratumoral administration. Our findings suggest that HVJ-E could be safely administered to patients with chemotherapy-resistant MPM at both study doses. HVJ-E exhibited some antitumor activity against chemotherapy-resistant MPM, and higher doses tended to have stronger antitumor effects than lower doses. Consequently, a phase II clinical trial with higher HVJ-E doses has been conducted for MPM treatment. Trial registration number: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (#UMIN000019345)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy against various cancers; however, there is a rising incidence of immune-related colitis. Some cases of immune-related colitis prove resistant to treatment, even with the administration of glucocorticoids or infliximab, and there is currently no established standard treatment for such cases., Case: The patient, a 73-year-old male, had undergone combination therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma for 2 years, utilizing both ipilimumab (a CTLA-4 inhibitor) and nivolumab (a PD-1 inhibitor). Unfortunately, the treatment led to side effects, specifically immune-related adverse event (irAE) enterocolitis. Steroid and infliximab treatment failed to improve the patient's condition. Treatment with tacrolimus was attempted, but the patient remained unresponsive. Subsequently, 45 mg of upadacitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, was administered. Symptoms improved rapidly following upadacitinib administration, and endoscopy also revealed positive results. With the increasing incidence of immune-related colitis, some patients have become resistant to treatment with glucocorticoids and infliximab. In this case, the irAE enterocolitis was improved by upadacitinib administration., Conclusion: In cases where immune-related colitis proves resistant to treatment with glucocorticoids, infliximab, or tacrolimus, upadacitinib represents a potential option as a JAK inhibitor., (© 2024 The Author(s). Cancer Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

In February 2004, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was the first to approve the combination of cisplatin (CDDP) and pemetrexed (PEM) as standard first-line chemotherapy for untreated, unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). However, after that approval, no progress was made in the standard first-line treatment of MPM for almost 15 years. Positive results from a phase 3 study (Mesothelioma Avastin Cisplatin Pemetrexed Study: MAPS) verifying the effect of bevacizumab, an anti-angiogenesis agent added to CDDP/PEM for unresectable MPM, were published in The Lancet in December 2015; however, this did not lead to approval by national drug regulatory agencies. Furthermore, no second-line treatment was established for cases refractory to CDDP/PEM. In August 2018, the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency of Japan was the first in the world to approve monotherapy with nivolumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), for previously unresectable, advanced, or recurrent MPM. Following Japan, in October 2020, the FDA approved the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab for the treatment of previously untreated, unresectable MPM. In this article, we review the transition of drug treatment for MPM, in light of the historical background, focusing on the benefits of ICIs., (Copyright © 2024 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Thoracic cancers comprise non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs), small cell lung cancers (SCLCs) and malignant pleural mesotheliomas (MPM). Collectively, they account for the highest rate of death from malignancy worldwide. Genomic instability is a universal feature of cancer, which fuels mutations and tumour evolution. Deficiencies in DNA damage response (DDR) genes amplify genomic instability. Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), resulting from BRCA1/BRCA2 inactivation, is exploited for therapeutic synthetic lethality with poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in breast and ovarian cancers, as well as in prostate and pancreatic cancers. However, DDR deficiency and its therapeutic implications are less well established in thoracic cancers. Emerging evidence suggests that a subset of thoracic cancers may harbour DDR deficiency and may, thus, be effectively targeted with DDR agents. Here, we review the current evidence surrounding DDR in thoracic cancers and discuss the challenges and promise for achieving clinical benefit with such therapeutics., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

A naturally occurring stilbene, resveratrol, shows promising effects in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) both as a single agent and in combination with chemotherapeutic drugs. To discover new anticancer agents targeting MPM, stilbene-targeted isolation was performed on the roots of Polygonum multiflorum Thunb., an herbal medicine rich in stilbene compounds. In this study, seven stilbene glycosides (1-7) were isolated, along with four non-stilbenes (8-11), of which compounds 4 and 9-11 have not previously been isolated from this species. Stiquinoside A (1) is a previously undescribed stilbene glycoside, and its structure was elucidated as (E)-2,3,5,4'-tetrahydroxystilbene 2-O-β-d-quinovopyranoside based on 1D and 2D-NMR, HR-ESI-MS, and acid hydrolysis experiments. Compounds 1, 4, 6, and 8 significantly inhibit the growth of MPM cancer cells H2452. These results demonstrate the potential utility of stilbenes in new strategies for the treatment of MPM., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Malignant mesothelioma is a rare tumour caused by asbestos exposure that originates mainly from the pleural lining or the peritoneum. Treatment options are limited, and the prognosis is dismal. Although immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) can improve survival outcomes, the determinants of responsiveness remain elusive. Here, we report the outcomes of a multi-centre phase II clinical trial (MiST4, NCT03654833) evaluating atezolizumab and bevacizumab (AtzBev) in patients with relapsed mesothelioma. We also use tumour tissue and gut microbiome sequencing, as well as tumour spatial immunophenotyping to identify factors associated with treatment response. MIST4 met its primary endpoint with 50% 12-week disease control, and the treatment was tolerable. Aneuploidy, notably uniparental disomy (UPD), homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), epithelial-mesenchymal transition and inflammation with CD68 + monocytes were identified as tumour-intrinsic resistance factors. The log-ratio of gut-resident microbial genera positively correlated with radiological response to AtzBev and CD8 + T cell infiltration, but was inversely correlated with UPD, HRD and tumour infiltration by CD68 + monocytes. In summary, a model is proposed in which both intrinsic and extrinsic determinants in mesothelioma cooperate to modify the tumour microenvironment and confer clinical sensitivity to AtzBev. Gut microbiota represent a potentially modifiable factor with potential to improve immunotherapy outcomes for individuals with this cancer of unmet need., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The immunogenicity of cancer cells is influenced by several factors, including the expression of the major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I), antigen expression, and the repertoire of proteasome-produced epitope peptides. The malignant pleural mesothelioma cell line ACC-MEOS-4 (MESO-4) expresses high levels of MHC-I and Wilms tumor 1 (WT1) tumor antigens. Using a functional T cell reporter assay specific for the HLA-A*24:02 restricted WT1 epitope (WT1235, CMTWNQMNL), we searched for factors that augmented the immunogenicity of MESO-4, focusing on proteasomes, which have a central role in the antigen processing machinery. ONX-0914, a selective inhibitor of the immunoproteasome subunit β5i, enhanced immunogenicity dose-dependently at low concentrations without cytotoxicity. In addition, CD8+ T lymphocytes recognizing WT1 showed greater cytotoxicity against MESO-4 pre-treated with ONX-0914. MESO-4 expresses a standard proteasome (SP) and immunoproteasome (IP). Notably, IP has distinct catalytic activity from SP, favoring the generation of antigenic peptides with high affinity for MHC-I in antigen-presenting cells and cancer cells. In vitro, immunoproteasome digestion assay and mass spectrometry analysis showed that IP cleaved WT1235 internally after the hydrophobic residues. Importantly, this internal cleavage of the WT1235 epitope was mitigated by ONX-0914. These results suggest that ONX-0914 prevents the internal destructive cleavage of WT1235 by IP, thereby promoting the specific presentation of the WT1 epitope by MESO-4. In conclusion, selective IP inhibitors might offer a means to modulate cancer cell immunogenicity by directing the presentation of particular tumor epitopes., Competing Interests: K. Kiyotani is a scientific advisor of Cancer Precision Medicine, Inc. No disclosures were reported by the other authors. We have confirmed that our adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on data and material sharing remains unchanged., (Copyright: © 2024 Ito et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

The combination of cisplatin and pemetrexed remains the gold standard chemotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), although resistance and poor response pose a significant challenge. Cytidine deaminase (CDA) is a key enzyme in the nucleotide salvage pathway and is involved in the adaptive stress response to chemotherapy. The cytidine analog capecitabine and its metabolite 5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine (5'-DFCR) are converted via CDA to 5-fluorouracil, which affects DNA and RNA metabolism. This study investigated a schedule-dependent treatment strategy, proposing that initial chemotherapy induces CDA expression, sensitizing cells to subsequent capecitabine treatment. Basal CDA protein expression was low in different mesothelioma cell lines but increased in the corresponding xenografts. Standard chemotherapy increased CDA protein levels in MPM cells in vitro and in vivo in a schedule-dependent manner. This was associated with epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and with HIF-1alpha expression at the transcriptional level. In addition, pretreatment with cisplatin and pemetrexed in combination sensitized MPM xenografts to capecitabine. Analysis of a tissue microarray (TMA) consisting of samples from 98 human MPM patients revealed that most human MPM samples had negative CDA expression. While survival curves based on CDA expression in matched samples clearly separated, significance was not reached due to the limited sample size. In non-matched samples, CDA expression before but not after neoadjuvant therapy was significantly associated with worse overall survival. In conclusion, chemotherapy increases CDA expression in xenografts, which is consistent with our in vitro results in MPM and lung cancer. A subset of matched patient samples showed increased CDA expression after therapy, suggesting that a schedule-dependent treatment strategy based on chemotherapy and capecitabine may benefit a selected MPM patient population., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: First-line standard-of-care for unresectable, pleural mesothelioma (PM) changed with the phase 3 CheckMate 743 study results, showing that nivolumab plus ipilimumab (Nivo + Ipi) significantly extended overall survival (OS) versus platinum + pemetrexed chemotherapy for PM (median OS 18.1 versus 14.1 months; hazard ratio: 0.74; p = 0.002). Efficacy and safety data in real-world (rw) settings are needed to confirm these results., Methods: This French multicenter, retrospective cohort study was undertaken to assess the outcomes of treatment-naïve PM patients given Nivo + Ipi via an early-access program (EAP). The primary objective was investigator-assessed real world -progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary objectives were the combination's -overall survival (OS) and safety., Results: From 1 April 2021 to 15 Feb 2022, the analysis included 201 of the 305 EAP-enrolled patients treated in 63 centers (79.6 % men; median age: 75 years; 91.8 % Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) 0/1; 74.5 % epithelioid histology). With median (95 % CI) follow-up for all patients of 18.4 (17.7-19.2) months, -PFS and OS were 6.3 (5.3-7.5) and 18.9 (17.6-not reached (NR)) months, with 1-year OS at 66.4 % (60.1-73.3 %). Median OS and 1-year survival rates were 21.0 (18.7-NR) and 70.8 % (63.9 %-780.6 %), and 14.1 (10.9-21.0) months and 54.9 % (42.8 %-70.4 %) for epithelioid and non-epithelioid PM subgroups, respectively. PFS was equal between the two subgroups. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 23.3 % of patients and three deaths were treatment-related., Conclusions: For this unselected PM population, efficacy and safety outcomes compared favorably with CheckMate 743 trial results., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the efficiency of pemetrexed cisplatin in comparison with gemcitabine cisplatin and to validate the EORTC (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer) prognostic score in combination chemotherapy treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma., Study Design:  An observational study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Oncology, Dicle University Hospital, Diyarbakir, Turkiye, from October 2000 to November 2017., Methodology: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients with EORTC score 0- were recruited. Factors affecting the prognosis of the disease and the effectiveness of first-line treatment were retrospectively analysed. EORTC prognostic score was calculated with a cut-off and survival analyses were used by the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank and univariable Cox regression tests were used to search for prognostic factors' impact on survival., Results: Patients who received gemcitabine cisplatin treatment had a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 9 months, while those who received pemetrexed cisplatin therapy had a median PFS of 7 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 17 months in the gemcitabine cisplatin group and 18 months in the pemetrexed cisplatin group (p = 0.051). When the low-risk group was compared with the high-risk group, the median OS was found to be statistically significant (p = 0.009)., Conclusion: The EORTC prognostic score, which is used for prognostic prediction in the period when pemetrexed is not utilised in the treatment of MPM, accurately predicts prognosis subsequent to the administration of pemetrexed in treatment. In the context of first-line treatment, cisplatin in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in combination with pemetrexed demonstrated comparable efficacy with respect to both overall survival and progression-free survival., Key Words: Chemotherapy, Mesothelioma, Prognosis, Gemcitabine, Progression-free survival.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive cancer with a very poor prognosis. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has taken center stage in the currently ongoing revolution that is changing standard-of-care treatment for several malignancies, including MPM. As multiple arguments and accumulating lines of evidence are in support of the existence of a therapeutic synergism between chemotherapy and immunotherapy, as well as between different classes of immunotherapeutics, we designed a multicenter, single-arm, phase I/II trial in which both programmed-death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibition and dendritic cell (DC) vaccination are integrated in the first-line conventional platinum/pemetrexed-based treatment scheme for epithelioid MPM patients (Immuno-MESODEC, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05765084). Fifteen treatment-naïve patients with unresectable epithelioid subtype MPM will be treated with four 3-weekly (±3 days) chemo-immunotherapy cycles. Standard-of-care chemotherapy consisting of cisplatinum (75mg/m2) and pemetrexed (500mg/m2) will be supplemented with the anti-PD-L1 antibody atezolizumab (1200 mg) and autologous Wilms' tumor 1 mRNA-electroporated dendritic cell (WT1/DC) vaccination (8-10 x 106 cells/vaccination). Additional atezolizumab (1680 mg) doses and/or WT1/DC vaccinations (8-10 x 106 cells/vaccination) can be administered optionally following completion of the chemo-immunotherapy scheme. Follow-up of patients will last for up to 90 days after final atezolizumab administration and/or WT1/DC vaccination or 24 months after diagnosis, whichever occurs later. The trial's primary endpoints are safety and feasibility, secondary endpoints are clinical efficacy and immunogenicity. This phase I/II trial will evaluate whether addition of atezolizumab and WT1/DC vaccination to frontline standard-of-care chemotherapy for the treatment of epithelioid MPM is feasible and safe. If so, this novel combination strategy should be further investigated as a promising advanced treatment option for this hard-to-treat cancer., Competing Interests: This trial is funded by Kom op tegen Kanker, NV Roche SA, the Methusalem financing program of the Flemish Government and the UZA Foundation. For more details, refer to the Financial Disclosure Section. In addition, PG received travel grants and honoraria for speaking or participation at meetings from SA Roche NV. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. The other authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright: © 2024 Van den Bossche et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

The clinical impact of soluble molecules in pleural effusion (PE) is unclear in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). In this single-center, retrospective, observational study, we assessed soluble forms of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), and PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays; three TGF-β isoforms were measured via multiplex assay in PE of patients with fibrinous pleuritis (FP) or MPM, to assess relationships between the levels of six molecules, clinicopathological characteristics, and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Soluble forms of CTLA-4, PD-L1, PD-1, TGF-β 1 , TGF-β 2 , and TGF-β 3 were variably produced in PE of FP (n = 34) and MPM (n = 79); we found significant relationships between the six molecules and clinicopathological features. Although none of the three soluble immune checkpoint molecules showed diagnostic or prognostic effects in patients with MPM, TGF-β 2 level in PE is a useful differential diagnostic marker between FP and MPM. Both TGF-β 1 and TGF-β 3 levels are promising prognostic markers for MPM. Moreover, we found that higher baseline levels of PD-1 soluble forms predicted the response to anti-PD1 monotherapy. Our findings identify novel diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers for anti-PD1 therapy in patients with MPM., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Dendritic cell immunotherapy has proven to be safe and induces an immune response in humans. We aimed to establish the efficacy of dendritic cells loaded with allogeneic tumour cell lysate (MesoPher, Amphera BV, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands) as maintenance therapy in patients with pleural mesothelioma., Methods: In this open-label, randomised, phase 2/3 study, patients with histologically confirmed unresectable pleural mesothelioma, aged 18 years or older, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-1, and non-progressing disease after four to six cycles of standard chemotherapy (with pemetrexed 500 mg/m 2 plus platinum [cisplatin 75 mg/m 2 or carboplatin area under the curve of 5]) were recruited from four centres in Belgium, France, and The Netherlands. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1), using block randomisation (block size of 4), stratified by centre and histology (epithelioid vs other), to MesoPher treatment plus best supportive care or best supportive care alone. Patients received up to a maximum of five MesoPher infusions, with treatment administered on days 1, 15, and 29, and weeks 18 and 30. At each timepoint, participants received an injection of 25 × 10 6 dendritic cells (two-thirds of the dendritic cells were administered intravenously and a third were injected intradermally). Best supportive care was per local institutional standards. The primary endpoint was overall survival, assessed in all participants randomly assigned to treatment (full analysis set) and safety assessed in all randomly assigned participants, and who underwent leukapheresis if they were in the MesoPher group. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03610360, and is closed for accrual., Findings: Between June 21, 2018, and June 10, 2021, 176 patients were screened and randomly assigned to the MesoPher group (n=88) or best supportive care alone group (n=88). One participant in the MesoPher group did not undergo leukapheresis. Mean age was 68 years (SD 8), 149 (85%) of 176 were male, 27 (15%) were female, 173 (98%) were White, two were Asian (1%), and one (1%) was other race. As of data cutoff (June 24, 2023), after a median follow up of 15·1 months (IQR 9·5-22·4), median overall survival was 16·8 months (95% CI 12·4-20·3; 61 [69%] of 88 died) in the MesoPher group and 18·3 months (14·3-21·9; 59 [67%] of 88 died) in the best supportive care group (hazard ratio 1·10 [95% CI 0·77-1·57]; log-rank p=0·62). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events were chest pain (three [3%] of 87 in the MesoPher group vs two [2%] of 88 in the best supportive care group), dyspnoea (none vs two [2%]), anaemia (two [2%] vs none), nausea (none vs two [2%]), and pneumonia (none vs two [2%]). No deaths due to treatment-emergent adverse events were recorded. Treatment-related adverse events consisted of infusion-related reactions (fever, chills, and fatigue), which occurred in 64 (74%) of 87 patients in the MesoPher group, and injection-site reactions (itch, erythema, and induration), which occurred in 73 (84%) patients, and all were grade 1-2 in severity. No deaths were determined to be treatment related., Interpretation: MesoPher did not show improvement in overall survival in patients with pleural mesothelioma. Immune checkpoint therapy is now standard of care in pleural mesothelioma. Further randomised studies are needed of combinations of MesoPher and immune checkpoint therapy, which might increase efficacy without adding major toxicities., Funding: Amphera BV and EU HORIZON., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests JGA reports grants, personal fees, research support, and stock ownership from Amphera and personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli-Lilly, MSD, CureVac, and Novocure. JGA has a patent for a tumour cell lysate licensed, a patent for a combination immunotherapy licensed, and a patent for a biomarker for immunotherapy licensed. RC reports personal fees from Janssen, MSD, Spectrum, and Librerium. PB reports receiving consulting fees for advisorships from AstraZeneca and Bristol Myers Squibb. AS reports personal fees and non-financial support from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, and MSD, of which the principal investigator fees directly went to their institution (CHRU Lille). DF reports personal fees from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, and AstraZeneca; personal fees and travel bursary from RS Oncology; and research funding from Astex Pharmaceuticals, Bergen Bio, Iovance, Owkin, GSK, MSD Oncology, Roche UK, Clovis Oncology, and Aldeyra. KB reports personal fees from Amphera. RK reports that he received fees from Amphera BV for statistical services related to the study. RBer reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Otsuka, Amgen, Lilly, GSK, EISAI, and Gilead; grants from Astra Zeneca, Roche, andNovartis; and grants and personal fees from MSD. RM and IE received consulting fees from Amphera BV and are stock owner of Amphera BV. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Competing Interests: ID-J declares consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, BostonGene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Catalyst, Eli Lilly, Epi-Q, Genentech, Gilead, Janssen, Merus, Novocure, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Syros, ThermoFisher Scientific, and Xcovery; and honoraria from Foundation Medicine, Creative Education Concepts, OncLive, ASCO Post, DAVA Oncology, Medscape, Research to Practice, Total Health, Aptitude Health, American Lung Association, PeerVIew, and Curio. MGZ declares consulting fees from Roche Diagnostics, Curis, and Ikena; honoraria from Physicians' Education Resource and Medscape; and research funding to Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from Vivace, MedImmune, Precog, GSK, Epizyme, Polaris, Sellas Life Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, Millenium, Curis, and Atara. MGZ also serves as Chair of the Board of Directors of the Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, an uncompensated position.

Background: This study aimed to investigate the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) versus chemotherapy on the prognosis of real-world diffuse pleural mesothelioma patients in China., Methods: Clinical data of 90 patients with diffuse pleural mesothelioma from 2019 to 2022 were collected from Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital. Patients were divided into two groups: the ICIs-treated group (n = 46) and the chemotherapy-only group (n = 44). The efficacy and safety of immunotherapy relative to chemotherapy at different treatment stages were explored., Results: The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.0 and 7.0 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 24.7 and 15.8 months in the ICIs-treated group and the chemotherapy group, respectively. The ICIs-treated group showed an 11% increase in objective response rate (ORR) (52.2% vs. 41.0%) and an 8.0% increase in disease control rate (DCR) (78.3% vs. 70.0%) compared to the chemotherapy group. The Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated significant PFS (HR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.38-0.98; p = 0.038) and OS (HR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.26-0.86; p = 0.011) benefits of receiving immunotherapy over chemotherapy alone. Subgroup analysis according to treatment timing showed the same trend., Conclusion: In patients with nonsurgical diffuse pleural mesothelioma, immunotherapy achieved better survival benefits compared to chemotherapy in both first- and second-/third-line treatments. The early addition of immunotherapy improved survival in patients with nonsurgical diffuse pleural mesothelioma., (© 2024 The Author(s). Thoracic Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background: The role of surgery in pleural mesothelioma remains controversial. It may be appropriate in highly selected patients as part of a multimodality treatment including chemotherapy. Recent years have seen a shift from extrapleural pleuropneumonectomy toward extended pleurectomy/decortication. The most optimal sequence of surgery and chemotherapy remains unknown., Methods: EORTC-1205-LCG was a multicentric, noncomparative phase 2 trial, 1:1 randomising between immediate (arm A) and deferred surgery (arm B), followed or preceded by chemotherapy. Eligible patients (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0-1) had treatment-naïve, borderline resectable T1-3 N0-1 M0 mesothelioma of any histology. Primary outcome was rate of success at 20 weeks, a composite end-point including 1) successfully completing both treatments within 20 weeks; 2) being alive with no signs of progressive disease; and 3) no residual grade 3-4 toxicity. Secondary end-points were toxicity, overall survival, progression-free survival and process indicators of surgical quality., Findings: 69 patients were included in this trial. 56 (81%) patients completed three cycles of chemotherapy and 58 (84%) patients underwent surgery. Of the 64 patients in the primary analysis, 21 out of 30 patients in arm A (70.0%; 80% CI 56.8-81.0%) and 17 out of 34 patients (50.0%; 80% CI 37.8-62.2%) in arm B reached the statistical end-point for rate of success. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 10.8 (95% CI 8.5-17.2) months and 27.1 (95% CI 22.6-64.3) months in arm A, and 8.0 (95% CI 7.2-21.9) months and 33.8 (95% CI 23.8-44.6) months in arm B. Macroscopic complete resection was obtained in 82.8% of patients. 30- and 90-day mortality were both 1.7%. No new safety signals were found, but treatment-related morbidity was high., Interpretation: EORTC 1205 did not succeed in selecting a preferred sequence of pre- or post-operative chemotherapy. Either procedure is feasible with a low mortality, albeit consistent morbidity. A shared informed decision between surgeon and patient remains essential., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright ©The authors 2024.)

We developed a composite symptom score (CSS) representing disease-related symptom burden over time in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Longitudinal data were collected from an open-label Phase IIB study in which 239 patients completed the validated MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for MPM (MDASI-MPM). A blinded, independent review committee of external patient-reported outcomes experts advised on MDASI-MPM symptoms to include in the CSS. Through iterative analyses of potential symptom-item combinations, 5 MPM symptoms (pain, fatigue, shortness of breath, muscle weakness, coughing) were selected. The CSS correlated strongly with the full MDASI-MPM symptom set (0.92-0.94) and the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale-Mesothelioma (0.79-0.87) at each co-administration of the scales. The CSS also had good sensitivity to worsening disease and global quality-of-life ratings. The MDASI-MPM CSS can be used as an outcome in MPM clinical trials, including in responder analyses and at the individual patient level. It is brief enough to administer frequently, including electronically, to better capture symptom trajectories during and after a trial and in clinical practice. As a single score, the CSS addresses multiplicity issues that can arise when several symptoms increase due to worsening disease. Our process can be adapted to produce a CSS for other advanced-cancer trials., (© 2024. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.)

Objectives: Results for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients following first-line treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab obtained with immunotherapy-modified PERCIST (imPERCIST), shown by [ 18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT), and modified RECIST (mRECIST), shown by CT, were compared for response evaluation and prognosis prediction., Results: imPERCIST indicated nine progressive metabolic disease (PMD), eight stable metabolic disease (SMD), four partial metabolic response (PMR), and five complete metabolic response (CMR) cases. mRECIST showed nine with progressive disease (PD), nine stable disease (SD), seven partial response (PR), and one complete response (CR). Although high concordance was noted (κ = 0.827), imPERCIST correctly judged a greater percentage with CMR (15.4%). Following a median 10.0 months, 15 patients showed progression and eight died from MPM. With both, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly longer in patients without progression (CMR/PMR/SMD, CR/PR/SD, respectively) as compared to PMD/PD patients (imPERCIST p < 0.0001 and p = 0.015, respectively; mRECIST p < 0.0001 and p = 0.015, respectively)., Methods: Twenty-six patients (23 males, 3 females; median 73.5 years) with histologically proven MPM and no curative surgery received nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy. FDG-PET/CT and diagnostic CT scanning at the baseline, and after 2-4 cycles (2 in three, 3 in 17, 4 in six patients) were performed. Therapeutic response findings evaluated using imPERCIST and mRECIST were compared. PFS and OS analyses were done using log-rank and Cox methods., Conclusion: For unresectable MPM patient examinations, FDG-PET and CT provide accurate findings for evaluating tumor response and also prognosis prediction following first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab immunotherapy (approximately three cycles).

Background: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of systemic therapies for unresectable malignant mesothelioma have reported conflicting results. It is crucial and urgent to find optimal treatment options for this malignancy, which currently has a poor prognosis., Methods: Databases PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and major international conferences were searched until February 29, 2024. The main outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs)., Results: We analyzed 16 RCTs with a total of 5018 patients. Among first-line therapies, nivolumab and ipilimumab significantly increased OS and resulted in fewer grade ≥3 TRAEs. Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy significantly increased PFS. Among salvage therapies, ramucirumab and chemotherapy was associated with the best OS and PFS, but resulted in more grade ≥3 TRAEs. Subgroup analysis by histologic types suggested that in first-line settings, bevacizumab and chemotherapy increase OS the most for epithelioid type, while the nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment increases OS the most for non-epithelioid type. In salvage therapies, ramucirumab and chemotherapy increase OS for both epithelioid and non-epithelioid types., Conclusion: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab was associated with the best OS among first-line treatments. Ramucirumab and chemotherapy was associated with the best clinical outcomes in salvage settings. Treatment for malignant mesothelioma should be tailored based on different clinicopathological characteristics., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pleural mesothelioma is a rare cancer with a dismal prognosis and few therapeutic options, especially in the pretreated setting. Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors as single agents yielded interesting results in refractory pleural mesothelioma, achieving a response rate between 10-20%, median progression-free survival of 2-5 months and median overall survival of 7-13 months., Patients and Methods: A retrospective, multi-institutional study of pleural mesothelioma patients treated with nivolumab in second and further line was performed. The endpoints of the study are response rate, disease control rate, progression free survival and overall survival., Results: Sixty-five patients with pleural mesothelioma treated with nivolumab in second and further line were enrolled at seven Italian institutions. The response rate was 8%, disease control rate was 37%, median progression free survival was 5.7 months (95% CI: 2.9-9.0) and median overall survival was 11.1 (95% CI 6.2-19.9) months. A higher neutrophils and neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio at baseline were associated with worse prognosis., Conclusion: Nivolumab as a single agent is fairly active in a cohort of unselected pretreated pleural mesothelioma patients. Further investigations on clinical and translational factors are needed to define which patient might benefit most from nivolumab treatment in pleural mesothelioma., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Most patients with pleural mesothelioma (PM) present with symptomatic pleural effusion. In some patients, PM is only detectable on the pleural surfaces, providing a strong rationale for intrapleural anticancer therapy. In modern prospective studies involving expert radiological staging and specialist multidisciplinary teams, the population incidence of stage I PM (an approximate surrogate of pleura-only PM) is higher than in historical retrospective series. In this Viewpoint, we advocate for the expansion of intrapleural trials to serve these patients, given the paucity of data supporting licensed systemic therapies in this setting and the uncertainties involved in surgical therapy. We begin by reviewing the unique anatomical and physiological features of the PM-bearing pleural space, before critically appraising the evidence for systemic therapies in stage I PM and previous intrapleural PM trials. We conclude with a summary of key challenges and potential solutions, including optimal trial designs, repurposing of indwelling pleural catheters, and new technologies., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests KGB declares institutional grant funding from Rocket Medical and RS Oncology; lecture honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb; and the role of chief investigator of the PREDICT-Meso International Accelerator Network. PSA declares research funding from ATARA Biotherapeutics; patents, royalties, and intellectual property on therapies licensed to ATARA Biotherapeutics; and scientific advisory board membership and consulting fees from ATARA Biotherapeutics, Bayer, Bio4T2, Carisma Therapeutics, Imugene, ImmPactBio, Johnson & Johnson, Orion Pharma, and Outpace Bio. PA declares equipment loans for courses from Novatech, Wolf, and Olympus. LD declares lecture honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb. YCGL declares receipt of equipment from Rocket Medical for use in clinical trials. ASM declares institutional grant funding from Novartis and Verily; consulting fees from Rising Tide and TRIPTYCH Health Partners; institutional payments or honoraria from Janssen, BeiGene, Chugai Pharmaceutical (Roche), Ideology Health (formerly Health Media), Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Kanker Instituut, AXIS Medical Education, Johnson & Johnson Global Services, Intellisphere, Answers in CME, University of Miami International Mesothelioma Symposium, and Immunocore; support for attending meetings from Shanghai Roche; membership of scientific advisory boards for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech/Roche, Takeda Oncology, and Sanofi Genzyme; and study funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb. SJM is co-principal investigator of the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration in Targeted Delivery for Hard-to-Treat Cancers; he declares consulting fees from DefiniGEN, and support for attending meetings from Alpha-1 Foundation, Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, and Mesothelioma UK. NM declares consulting fees from Rocket Medical UK, Cook Medical UK, and Becton Dickinson. VP declares grant funding from the Danish Comprehensive Cancer Center and no conflicts of interest within the scope of this Viewpoint. NMR declares consulting fees from Rocket Medical UK, Cook Medical UK, and LTI USA. MGZ declares institutional grant funding from Medimmune, Precog, GSK, Epizyme, Polaris, Sellas Life Sciences, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Millenium, Curis, and Atara; consulting fees from Curis, Ikena, Takeda, GSK, and Novocure; and honoraria from PER and Medscape. DS declares support including research funding and consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Exigo Management, Flame Biosciences, HitchBio, Intuitive Surgical, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, Medscape, Olympus Corporation of the Americas (also known as Spiration), Sensei Biotherapeutics, Trizell, Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania, Verismo, and Wolters Kluwer Health. DAF declares institutional grants from Aldeyra, Astex Therapeutics, Bayer Oncology, Bergen Bio, Boehringer Ingelheim, Clovis Oncology, Eli Lilly, Lovance, MSD, Owkin, Roche Oncology, and RS Oncology; consulting fees from Cambridge Clinical Laboratories and RS Oncology; honoraria from MSD and Bristol-Myers Squibb; support for attending meetings from RS Oncology; and participation on data monitoring or advisory boards for AstraZeneca and RS Oncology. TP declares no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Background: Extended pleurectomy decortication for complete macroscopic resection for pleural mesothelioma has never been evaluated in a randomised trial. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes after extended pleurectomy decortication plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone., Methods: MARS 2 was a phase 3, national, multicentre, open-label, parallel two-group, pragmatic, superiority randomised controlled trial conducted in the UK. The trial took place across 26 hospitals (21 recruiting only, one surgical only, and four recruiting and surgical). Following two cycles of chemotherapy, eligible participants with pleural mesothelioma were randomly assigned (1:1) to surgery and chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone using a secure web-based system. Individuals aged 16 years or older with resectable pleural mesothelioma and adequate organ and lung function were eligible for inclusion. Participants in the chemotherapy only group received two to four further cycles of chemotherapy, and participants in the surgery and chemotherapy group received pleurectomy decortication or extended pleurectomy decortication, followed by two to four further cycles of chemotherapy. It was not possible to mask allocation because the intervention was a major surgical procedure. The primary outcome was overall survival, defined as time from randomisation to death from any cause. Analyses were done on the intention-to-treat population for all outcomes, unless specified. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02040272, and is closed to new participants., Findings: Between June 19, 2015, and Jan 21, 2021, of 1030 assessed for eligibility, 335 participants were randomly assigned (169 to surgery and chemotherapy, and 166 to chemotherapy alone). 291 (87%) participants were men and 44 (13%) women, and 288 (86%) were diagnosed with epithelioid mesothelioma. At a median follow-up of 22·4 months (IQR 11·3-30·8), median survival was shorter in the surgery and chemotherapy group (19·3 months [IQR 10·0-33·7]) than in the chemotherapy alone group (24·8 months [IQR 12·6-37·4]), and the difference in restricted mean survival time at 2 years was -1·9 months (95% CI -3·4 to -0·3, p=0·019). There were 318 serious adverse events (grade ≥3) in the surgery group and 169 in the chemotherapy group (incidence rate ratio 3·6 [95% CI 2·3 to 5·5], p<0·0001), with increased incidence of cardiac (30 vs 12; 3·01 [1·13 to 8·02]) and respiratory (84 vs 34; 2·62 [1·58 to 4·33]) disorders, infection (124 vs 53; 2·13 [1·36 to 3·33]), and additional surgical or medical procedures (15 vs eight; 2·41 [1·04 to 5·57]) in the surgery group., Interpretation: Extended pleurectomy decortication was associated with worse survival to 2 years, and more serious adverse events for individuals with resectable pleural mesothelioma, compared with chemotherapy alone., Funding: National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (15/188/31), Cancer Research UK Feasibility Studies Project Grant (A15895)., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests EL reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Medela, Johnson & Johnson/Ethicon, Covidien/Medtronic, Guardant Health, Takeda, Lilly Oncology, and Bayer, paid to his institution, his company, or personally; consulting fees from BeiGene, Roche, and BMS; honoraria from Medela; two patents (P52435GB and P57988GB) issued to Imperial Innovations; and being founder of My Cancer Companion, Healthcare Companion. SP reports consulting fees from AnHeart Therapeutics, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Blueprint, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ellipses, EQRx, Daiichi Sankyo, GSK, Guardant Health, IO Biotech, Janssen, Lilly, Merck Serono, Mirati, MSD, Novocure, Novartis, PharmaMar, Roche, Takeda, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, and Turning Point Therapeutics; honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Guardant Health, Janssen, Merck Serono, Roche, and Takeda; fees for expert testimony from Roche and Merck Serono; support for meeting attendance from Janssen, Roche, and Gilead; and being a member of the British Thoracic Oncology Group, ALK Positive UK, Lung Cancer Europe, Ruth Strauss Foundation, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, and ETOP-IBCSG Partners Foundation Board. NT reports honoraria from BMS. DF reports grants from Astex Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer Oncology, Bergen Bio, GSK, MSD, Owkin, Roche, and RS Oncology paid to his institution; consulting fees from MSD, Cambridge Clinical Laboratories, and RS Oncology; honoraria from BMS, BI, MSD, Ikena, and Owkin; and meeting support from RS Oncology and MSD, all paid to Thoracic Oncology Services where he is director. RCR reports research funding from Cancer Research UK, Asthma and Lung UK, June Hancock Mesothelioma Research Fund, Mick Knighton Mesothelioma Research Fund, and Mesobank; and participation on an advisory board for the UK Lung Cancer Coalition. PT reports honoraria from AstraZeneca. LC-S reports support for meeting attendance from Lilly. RC reports honoraria from AstraZeneca, MSD, Takeda, Janssen, Roche, and GSK; support for meeting attendance from Takeda and Janssen; participation on advisory boards for GSK, Takeda, Janssen, Pharmamar, and Amgen; and stock options with TCC and Supportive Care UK. YS reports honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, BMS, MSD, Lilly, Roche, and Takeda; and support for meeting attendance from Takeda and Roche. ZT reports honoraria from AstraZeneca. RS reports honoraria and support for meeting attendance from Lilly and BMS. EF reports membership of the National Lung Cancer and Mesothelioma Clinical Experts Group and Northern Cancer Alliance Targeted Lung Health Check Clinical Lead. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Human malignant pleural mesothelioma (hMPM) is an aggressive, rare disease with a poor prognosis. Histologically, MPM is categorized into epithelioid, biphasic, and sarcomatoid subtypes, with the epithelioid subtype generally displaying a better response to treatment. Conversely, effective therapies for the non-epithelioid subtypes are limited. This study aimed to investigate the potential role of FK228, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, in the suppression of hMPM tumor growth. We conducted a comprehensive analysis of the histological and molecular characteristics of two MPM cell lines, CRL-5820 (epithelioid) and CRL-5946 (non-epithelioid). CRL-5946 cells and non-epithelioid patient-derived xenografted mice exhibited heightened growth rates compared to those with epithelioid MPM. Both CRL-5946 cells and non-epithelioid mice displayed a poor response to cisplatin. However, FK228 markedly inhibited the growth of both epithelioid and non-epithelioid tumor cells in vitro and in vivo. Cell cycle analysis revealed FK228-induced G1/S and mitotic arrest in MPM cells. Caspase inhibitor experiments demonstrated that FK228-triggered apoptosis occurred via a caspase-dependent pathway in CRL-5946 but not in CRL-5820 cells. Additionally, a cytokine array analysis showed that FK228 reduced the release of growth factors, including platelet-derived and vascular endothelial growth factors, specifically in CRL-5946 cells. These results indicate that FK228 exhibits therapeutic potential in MPM by inducing cytotoxicity and modulating the tumor microenvironment, potentially benefiting both epithelioid and non-epithelioid subtypes., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare cancer with high malignancy and aggressiveness on the pleural, caused by the following risk factors including asbestos inhalation, genetic factors, and genetic mutation. The present chemotherapy, antiangiogenic therapy, and immunotherapy methods are ineffective and the survival time of patients is very short. There is an urgent need to find potential therapeutic targets for MPM. At present, it has been found the following types of targets: gene mutation targets such as BRCA associated protein 1 (BAP1) and cyclin-dependent kinase 2A (CDKN2A); epigenetic targets such as lysine (K)-specific demethylase 4A (KDM4A) and lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1), and signal protein targets such as glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3). So far, available clinical trials include phase II clinical trials of histone methyltransferase inhibitor Tazemetostat, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor Rucaparib and cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor Abemaciclib, as well as phase I clinical trials of mesothelin-targeting chimeric antigen receptor T-cell immunotherapy (CAR-T) cell injection in the thoracic cavity and TEA domain family member (TEAD) inhibitor VT3989 and IK-930, and the results of these trials have showed certain clinical efficacy.
.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) remains an incurable disease. This is partly due to the lack of experimental models that fully recapitulate the complexity and heterogeneity of MPM, a major challenge for therapeutic management of the disease. In addition, the contribution of the MPM microenvironment is relevant for the adaptive response to therapy. We established mesothelioma patient-derived organoid (mPDO) cultures from MPM pleural effusions and tested their response to pemetrexed and cisplatin. We aimed to evaluate the contribution of mesothelioma-associated fibroblasts (MAFs) to the response to pemetrexed and cisplatin (P+C). Organoid cultures were obtained from eight MPM patients using specific growth media and conditions to expand pleural effusion-derived cells. Flow cytometry was used to verify the similarity of the organoid cultures to the original samples. MAFs were isolated and co-cultured with mPDOs, and the addition of MAFs reduced the sensitivity of mPDOs to P+C. Organoid formation and expression of cancer stem cell markers such as ABCG2, NANOG, and CD44 were altered by conditioned media from treated MAFs. We identified IL-6 as the major contributor to the attenuated response to chemotherapy. IL-6 secretion by MAFs is correlated with increased resistance of mPDOs to pemetrexed and cisplatin.

Objectives: Pleural mesothelioma is a cancer arising in the cells that line the lungs and chest wall with poor survival and poor response to first-line therapy. Organoid models of cancer can faithfully recapitulate the genetic and histopathological characteristics of individualized tumors and have potential to be used for precision medicine, however methods of establishing patient-derived mesothelioma organoids have not been well established in the published literature., Materials and Methods: Long-term mesothelioma patient-derived organoids were established from ten malignant pleural effusion fluids. Mesothelioma patient-derived organoids were compared to the corresponding biopsy tissue specimens using immunohistochemistry labelling for select diagnostic markers and the TruSight Oncology-500 sequencing assay. Cell viability in response to the chemotherapeutic drug cisplatin was assessed., Results: We established five mesothelioma patient-derived organoid cultures from ten malignant pleural effusion fluids collected from nine individuals with pleural mesothelioma. Mesothelioma patient-derived organoids typically reflected the histopathological and genomic features of patients' matched biopsy specimens and displayed cytotoxic sensitivity to cisplatin in vitro., Conclusion: This is the first study of its kind to establish long-term mesothelioma organoid cultures from malignant pleural effusions and report on their utility to test individuals' chemotherapeutic sensitivities ex vivo., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The NIPU-trial investigates the effect of adding the telomerase vaccine UV1 to treatment with ipilimumab and nivolumab for patients with pleural mesothelioma (PM)., Methods: In this phase 2 open-label trial, patients with PM progressing after first-line chemotherapy were randomised to receive ipilimumab and nivolumab alone (arm B) or combined with UV1 (arm A). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) as determined by BICR. It was estimated that 69 PFS events were needed to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.60 with 80% power and a one-sided alpha level of 0.10., Results: 118 patients were randomised. The median PFS determined by blinded independent central review (BICR) was 4.2 months (95%CI 2.9-9.8) in arm A and 4.7 months (95%CI 3.9-7.0) in arm B (HR 1.01, 80%CI 0.75-1.36 P = 0.979), after a median follow-up of 12.5 months (95%CI 9.7-15.6). The investigator-determined median PFS was 4.3 months (95%CI 3.0-6.8) in arm A and 2.9 months (95%CI 2.4-5.5) in arm B (HR 0.60, 80%CI 0.45-0.81 P = 0.025). Confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by BICR was 31% in arm A and 16% in arm B (odds ratio 2.44 80%CI 1.35-4.49 P = 0.056). After a median follow-up time of 17.3 months (95%CI 15.8-22.9), the OS was 15.4 months (95%CI 11.1-22.6) in arm A and 11.1 months (95%CI 8.8-18.1) in arm B, (HR 0.73, 80%CI 0.53-1.0, P = 0.197)., Conclusion: The primary endpoint was not met. Predefined analyses of response rates are in favour of adding the vaccine., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Vilde Drageset Haakensen - Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events: AstraZeneca, Roche, Takeda, Pfizer, BMS, MSD, Janssen. Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board: Novartis, Astra Zeneca, BMS. Leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid: Board member of lung cancer patient organization from 2022. Support from the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authorities, grant number 2021083. Maria Bjaanæs - Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events: AstraZeneca, Pfizer, BMS. Weronika Maria Szejniuk – none declared. Solfrid Thunold - Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events: BMS. Susana Cedres - Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board: F. Hoffmann La Roche AG, MSD Oncology, Pfizer, Amphera, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS Wee L Chin – none declared. Tonje Sofie Dalen – none declared. Saima Farooqi - Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events: Merck. Oscar Grundberg – none declared. Åslaug Helland - All support for the present manuscript (e.g., funding, provision of study materials, medical writing, article processing charges, etc.): South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authorities, grant number 202007 and 2016056, Ultimovacs, BMS. Grants or contracts from any entity: Roche, InCyte, Astra Zeneca, Merck, Novartis, Eli Lilly, GSK, Illumina, Nanopore. Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events: AstraZeneca, Janssen, Medicovver, Bayer, Eli Lilly, MSD, BMS, Merck, Sanofi, Abbvie, Pfizer, Takeda, Novartis, Roche. Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board: AMGEN (DSMC), AdBoard: Roche, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Janssen, BMS, EliLilly, Abbvie, Bayer, Sanofi, Merck, Takeda. Leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid: Board member of lung cancer patient organization until 2022 Marius Lund Iversen – none declared. Anna K Nowak - Grants or contracts from any entity: Astra Zeneca. Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, BMS, Douglas Pharmaceuticals Åsa Kristina Öjlert – none declared. Jens Benn Sørensen - Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board: BMS, Merck, Astra Zeneca., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have expanded the arsenal of cancer therapeutics over the last decade but are associated with a spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including inflammatory arthritis. While these complications are increasingly recognized in the adult population, no cases of inflammatory arthritis irAEs have been reported in the pediatric literature., Case Presentation: A 14-year-old female with metastatic epithelioid mesothelioma was referred to the pediatric rheumatology clinic after developing progressive inflammatory joint pain in her bilateral shoulders, hips, and small joints of hands following the second cycle of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab. Initial examinations showed bilateral shoulder joint line tenderness, positive FABERs test bilaterally, tenderness over bilateral greater trochanters, and bilateral second PIP effusions. Her serological profile was notable for positive HLA-B27, positive anti-CCP, negative Rheumatoid Factor, and negative ANA. PET-CT scan performed for disease response following immunotherapy showed symmetric increased metabolic activity primarily involving the supraspinatus, gluteus medius and minimus, and semimembranosus tendon insertions. Her presentation was consistent with a grade 1 irAE that worsened to a grade 2 irAE despite NSAID therapy, prompting a short course of oral prednisolone. She achieved clinical remission of her mesothelioma following six cycles of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab and her inflammatory arthritis was controlled on Celebrex monotherapy., Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first pediatric case of ICI-induced inflammatory arthritis and enthesitis. This case highlights the importance of increasing awareness of diagnosis and management of irAEs in children., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: The primary aim was to investigate emerging 3D printing and optical acquisition technologies to refine and enhance photodynamic therapy (PDT) dosimetry in the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM)., Materials and Methods: A rigorous digital reconstruction of the pleural lung cavity was conducted utilizing 3D printing and optical scanning methodologies. These reconstructions were systematically assessed against CT-derived data to ascertain their accuracy in representing critical anatomic features and post-resection topographical variations., Results: The resulting reconstructions excelled in their anatomical precision, proving instrumental translation for precise dosimetry calculations for PDT. Validation against CT data confirmed the utility of these models not only for enhancing therapeutic planning but also as critical tools for educational and calibration purposes., Conclusion: The research outlined a successful protocol for the precise calculation of light distribution within the complex environment of the pleural cavity, marking a substantive advance in the application of PDT for MPM. This work holds significant promise for individualizing patient care, minimizing collateral radiation exposure, and improving the overall efficiency of MPM treatments., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest TMB reports other support from Simphotek and personal fees from Lumeda and IBA outside the submitted work. Author KC reports other support from Simphotek., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Importance: Arginine deprivation using ADI-PEG20 (pegargiminase) combined with chemotherapy is untested in a randomized study among patients with cancer. ATOMIC-Meso (ADI-PEG20 Targeting of Malignancies Induces Cytotoxicity-Mesothelioma) is a pivotal trial comparing standard first-line chemotherapy plus pegargiminase or placebo in patients with nonepithelioid pleural mesothelioma., Objective: To determine the effect of pegargiminase-based chemotherapy on survival in nonepithelioid pleural mesothelioma, an arginine-auxotrophic tumor., Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a phase 2-3, double-blind randomized clinical trial conducted at 43 centers in 5 countries that included patients with chemotherapy-naive nonepithelioid pleural mesothelioma from August 1, 2017, to August 15, 2021, with at least 12 months' follow-up. Final follow-up was on August 15, 2022. Data analysis was performed from March 2018 to June 2023., Intervention: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive weekly intramuscular pegargiminase (36.8 mg/m2) or placebo. All patients received intravenous pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) and platinum (75-mg/m2 cisplatin or carboplatin area under the curve 5) chemotherapy every 3 weeks up to 6 cycles. Pegargiminase or placebo was continued until progression, toxicity, or 24 months., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was overall survival, and secondary end points were progression-free survival and safety. Response rate by blinded independent central review was assessed in the phase 2 portion only., Results: Among 249 randomized patients (mean [SD] age, 69.5 [7.9] years; 43 female individuals [17.3%] and 206 male individuals [82.7%]), all were included in the analysis. The median overall survival was 9.3 months (95% CI, 7.9-11.8 months) with pegargiminase-chemotherapy as compared with 7.7 months (95% CI, 6.1-9.5 months) with placebo-chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] for death, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55-0.93; P = .02). The median progression-free survival was 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.8-7.4 months) with pegargiminase-chemotherapy as compared with 5.6 months (95% CI, 4.1-5.9 months) with placebo-chemotherapy (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46-0.90; P = .02). Grade 3 to 4 adverse events with pegargiminase occurred in 36 patients (28.8%) and with placebo in 21 patients (16.9%); drug hypersensitivity and skin reactions occurred in the experimental arm in 3 patients (2.4%) and 2 patients (1.6%), respectively, and none in the placebo arm. Rates of poststudy treatments were comparable in both arms (57 patients [45.6%] with pegargiminase vs 58 patients [46.8%] with placebo)., Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of arginine depletion with pegargiminase plus chemotherapy, survival was extended beyond standard chemotherapy with a favorable safety profile in patients with nonepithelioid pleural mesothelioma. Pegargiminase-based chemotherapy as a novel antimetabolite strategy for mesothelioma validates wider clinical testing in oncology., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02709512.

Background: Although nivolumab has shown clinical benefits for relapsed malignant mesothelioma, its cost-effectiveness requires further investigation., Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab compared to placebo for relapsed malignant mesotheliomas from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system., Method: A three-state Markov model was developed based on data from the phase 3 randomized CONFIRM clinical trial. The drug cost and utility values for the health state were obtained from the relevant literature. The measured outcomes included quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses (OWSA) were performed to assess the uncertainty of the model., Results: Patients receiving nivolumab gained more health benefits (0.65 QALYs vs. 0.43 QALYs). The cost was higher ($25,806.08 vs. $9,310.74) than for patients in the placebo group, resulting in an ICER of $75,805.11/QALY, which was above the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of three times per capita GDP ($35,864.61) in China. The result of OWSA indicated that the cost of nivolumab, the utility of the disease progression, and the discount rate were the most significant factors. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested that the probability that nivolumab was not cost-effective as was 100.00% above the specified WTP threshold., Conclusion: From the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, nivolumab was not as cost-effective as placebo for relapsed malignant mesothelioma., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Background: The available data on the role of perioperative systemic chemotherapy (SC) for diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) patients undergoing (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is heterogeneous and unstandardized. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of SC on the survival outcomes of DMPM patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC and to identify prognostic factors that affect the decision to administer SC., Methods: Patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC in the National Cancer Institute Milan (1995-2020) were retrospectively analyzed using propensity score-matching of known covariates. The patients were grouped into three groups: group A (neoadjuvant chemotherapy [NACT] and no-SC), group B (no-SC and adjuvant chemotherapy [ACT]), and group C (NACT and ACT). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meir method, and prognostic factors were calculated using the Cox-regression method., Results: After a median follow-up period of 45 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.348-83.652 months) for group A, 115 months (95% CI, 44.379-185.621 months) for group B, and 88 months (95% CI, 3.296-172.704 months) for group C, the study analyzed 154 DMPM patients consisting of matched group A (NACT: 60 + no-SC: 52 = 112), group B (ACT: 38 + no-SC: 38 = 76), and group C (NACT: 31 + ACT: 31 = 62). The patients undergoing ACT had better 5-year OS and PFS than the patients undergoing NACT. In the multivariate analysis, ACT was significantly associated with improved OS by 48% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; 95% CI, 0.280-0.965, p = 0.038). For PFS, the association of ACT did not reach statistical significance (HR, 0.531; 95% CI, 0.266-1.058; p = 0.072)., Conclusion: The optimum treatment sequence for DMPM is CRS-HIPEC followed by adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk patients. Upfront surgery appears preferable to NACT for patients amenable to complete CRS., (© 2023. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Objectives: Lactate dehydrogenase A (LDH-A) catalyzes the last step of glycolysis: supplying cells rapidly but inefficiently with ATP. Many tumors, including malignant mesothelioma (MM), have a high expression of LDH-A, which is associated with cancer aggressiveness. We aimed to determine whether the efficacy of the gemcitabine/carboplatin (Gem + Carbo) combination, widely used to treat this disease, could be increased by inhibition of LDH-A (by NHI-2). To this aim, we analyzed the growth inhibition of pleural and peritoneal MM by multiple combinations., Methods: The 72 h sulforhodamine B assay (SRB) was used to test the cytotoxicity of the combination of gemcitabine (in the range 0.1 - 400 nM) and carboplatin (0.01 - 40 µM) with a fixed concentration of NHI-2 (at IC 25 ). We used pleural (H2452) and primary peritoneal (STO, MESO-II) MM cell lines, cultured at normoxic conditions., Results: NHI-2 did not increase the cytotoxicity of the combination of 100 nM gemcitabine and 10 µM carboplatin in peritoneal MM cell lines. The cell growth inhibition was 10% smaller after the triple combination than the Gem + Carbo treatment., Conclusions: Inhibition of LDH-A did not increase the efficacy of gemcitabine and carboplatin in MM under normoxic conditions.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and challenging cancer associated with asbestos fiber exposure, which offers limited treatment options. Historically, platinum-based chemotherapy has been the primary approach, but recent developments have introduced immunotherapy as a promising alternative for the treatment of this disease. Nevertheless, the unique growth patterns and occasionally ambiguous progressive characteristics of MPM make the interpretation of radiological assessments complex. Immunotherapy further complicates matters by introducing unconventional treatment response patterns such as hyperprogression and pseudoprogression. Consequently, there is a growing imperative to integrate the standard RECIST criteria with the mesothelioma-specific mRECIST criteria (version 1.1), as outlined in iRECIST. This comprehensive review is driven by the intent to provide a valuable resource for radiologists and clinicians engaged in the diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of MPM in the era of immunotherapy. Specifically, the current imaging methods employed for staging and follow-up will be exposed and discussed, with a focus on the technical specificities and the mRECIST 1.1 methodology. Furthermore, we will provide a discussion about major clinical trials related to the use of immunotherapy in MPM patients. Finally, the latest advancements in radiomics, the applications of artificial intelligence in MPM, and their potential impact on clinical practice for prognosis and therapy, are discussed., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Objectives: Nivolumab (anti-PD-1) plus ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) is a new first-line treatment combination for patients with pleural mesothelioma. Nivolumab-ipilimumab improved the survival, however, 30.3% of the patients suffered from grade 3-4 treatment related adverse events (TRAE's) and TRAE's led to discontinuation in 23.0% of all patients. Here, we present the first real-world data of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with malignant mesothelioma treated in two mesothelioma expert centers., Methods: Clinical data of patients with mesothelioma treated with nivolumab and ipilimumab were prospectively collected. Clinical parameters were obtained every visit, CT scans were evaluated every 12 weeks and adverse events were assessed continuously during the treatment. Data on grade 2-5 TRAE's and activity (overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) were reported., Results: Between January 2021 and August 2022, 184 patients were treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab. The median follow-up was 12.1 months (95 %CI 11.1 - 13.1). Grade 3-4 TRAEs were seen in 27.7 % of the patients and 25.0 % discontinued immunotherapy treatment early because of TRAE's. ORR was 21.7 % (95 % CI 15.7-27.7), median DOR was 5.7 months (IQR 3.2-8.7) and DCR at 12 weeks 56.0 % (95 % CI 48.8-63.2). The mPFS was 5.5 months (95 %CI 4.1-6.9), mOS was 14.1 months (95 % CI 11.1-18.2)., Conclusions: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab had an equal efficacy in a real-world comparable population but also a high risk of TRAE's, leading to discontinuation of treatment in 25% of the patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Macrophages constitute the main part of infiltrating immune cells in Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) and abnormally high ratios of M2 macrophages are present in both pleural effusion and tissue samples of MPM patients. Whether MPM cells affect formation of M2 macrophages is poorly understood. In this study, we focused on identification of MPM-cells-derived soluble factors with M2-promoting effects. Methods: Media of malignant pleural mesothelioma cells were collected and soluble factors affecting macrophages were analyzed by mass spectrometry. TGF-β receptor inhibitor SB431542 was used as the entry point to explore the downstream mechanism of action by qRT-PCR, WB and immunofluorescence. Results: The serum-free culture media collected from the human MPM cells Meso1 and Meso2 significantly enhanced expression of the M2 signature molecules including IL-10, TGF-β and CD206 in the human macrophages THP-1, while the culture medium of the human MPM cells H2452 did not show such M2-promoting effects. Analysis of proteins by mass spectrometry and ELISA suggested that Leucine rich α2 glycoprotein 1(LRG1) was a potential candidate. LRG1 time- and dose-dependently increased expression of the M2 signature molecules, confirming its M2-promoting effects. Furthermore, LRG1's M2-promoting effects were reduced by the TGF-β receptor inhibitor SB431542, and LRG1 increased phosphorylation of Smad2, indicating that M2-promoting effects of LRG1 were via the TGF-β receptor/Smad2 signaling pathway. Conclusions: Our results provide a potential M2-promoting new member, LRG1, which contributes to the immune escape of MPM via the TGF-β receptor/Smad2 signaling pathway.

Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPeM) is a rare malignancy with historically poor prognosis. Recent research has started to reveal increasingly prevalent genetic mutations seen in this malignancy. Here, we report a case of complete clinical remission of unresectable, metastatic MPeM with systemic chemotherapy. Immunohistochemistry of our patient's malignant cytology sample showed loss of Breast Cancer Gene 1-associated protein-1 expression (BAP1). The patient had synchronous diagnoses of primary squamous cell carcinoma of the anus, benign schwannoma and meningioma. Following the completion of 18 cycles of pemetrexed and bevacizumab, the patient has remained in clinical remission for 8 months. We examine the unusual susceptibility of unresectable MPeM to systemic chemotherapy and attribute susceptibility to the molecular milieu created by mutations in multiple DNA repair pathways. We encourage increased testing for and analysis of mutations in DNA repair pathways to improve future treatment outcomes in this rare malignancy., Competing Interests: Competing interests: Dr Sherise C Rogers is a Medsphere consultant and Natera Oncology Advisor. She is also a recipient of the Robert A Winn Diversity in Clinical Trials Career Development Award, funded by Bristol Myers Squibb Foundation. There are no declared competing interests for any of the other authors., (© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: Several prospective trials had been reported on chemotherapy with or without antiangiogenic agents in patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), with diverse results. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination regimen., Methods: We systematically identified trials in several databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ASCO Abstracts and ESMO Abstracts. All the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about chemotherapy combined with antiangiogenic agents in advanced MPM were identified. Overall survival (OS) was the primary outcome, while progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and serious toxicities were the secondary outcomes. Review Manager 5.3 was used to perform the statistical analyses. Stata 12.0 was used to assess the publication bias of egger's test., Results: 5 randomized controlled trials containing 1250 patients were finally included in this analysis. Statistical analyses showed that the addition of antiangiogenic agents to chemotherapy could prolong OS [HR 0.79 (0.71-0.89), p<0.0001] and PFS [HR 0.75 (0.68-0.84), p<0.00001] in advanced MPM, especially in the epithelioid subgroup, with a tolerable toxicity profile. No significant difference was found in the analysis of ORR [HR 1.13 (0.95-1.35), p = 0.18]. Heterogeneity was found in the analyses of PFS and ORR, which might be caused by the limitation in uniform evaluation of tumor response., Conclusions: The combination of antiangiogenic agents with chemotherapy showed superior over chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced MPM. More prospective trials should be warranted to identify patients who would most likely benefit from the combination regimen., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2023 Tian et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)