1. Reliability of Mesopic Measures of Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity and Their Correlation with Rod and Cone Function in Retinitis Pigmentosa
- Author
-
Bittner, Ava K and Ferraz, Mariana C
- Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences ,Ophthalmology and Optometry ,Clinical Research ,Neurosciences ,Rare Diseases ,Eye Disease and Disorders of Vision ,Eye ,Adult ,Contrast Sensitivity ,Female ,Follow-Up Studies ,Humans ,Male ,Mesopic Vision ,Middle Aged ,Reproducibility of Results ,Retinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells ,Retinal Rod Photoreceptor Cells ,Retinitis Pigmentosa ,Retrospective Studies ,Visual Acuity ,Visual Fields ,Retinitis pigmentosa ,Scotopic ,Visual acuity ,Contrast sensitivity ,Cone sensitivity ,Rod function ,Opthalmology and Optometry ,Ophthalmology & Optometry ,Ophthalmology and optometry - Abstract
BackgroundMesopic conditions elicit both rod and cone responses, and they are more commonly encountered in daily life than are scotopic conditions; yet visual function outcome measures of mesopic visual acuity (VA) or contrast sensitivity (CS) are rarely evaluated.ObjectiveIn retinitis pigmentosa (RP), we explored whether visual reductions in mesopic versus photopic conditions were correlated with cone or rod function, as well as the between-visit test-retest variability in mesopic measures.MethodsAt each of two visits, 22 RP subjects completed mesopic and photopic ETDRS VA and Pelli-Robson chart CS tests obtained with and without a U23 NoIR 4% transmission filter; testing of perifoveal scotopic cone or rod sensitivity with the AdaptDx; and the Rabin Cone Contrast Test (CCT).ResultsA greater CS reduction in mesopic versus photopic conditions was significantly related to absence of scotopic rod function (p = 0.038) or longer self-reported duration of night vision loss (p = 0.044). VA reductions >0.2 logMAR in mesopic versus photopic conditions were significantly related to reduced cone-mediated scotopic sensitivity (p = 0.038). Significant predictors of the CCT ratio of S-cone to M- and L-cone sensitivity were mesopic VA (p = 0.038) and absence of AdaptDx rod function (p = 0.008). Test-retest 95% coefficients of repeatability were not significantly different when comparing between photopic and mesopic tests of VA (0.16 and 0.12 logMAR, respectively) or CS (0.21 and 0.24 logCS, respectively).ConclusionsPerifoveal scotopic rod and cone function measured with the AdaptDx was significantly correlated with mesopic CS and VA, respectively, which had good, acceptable test-retest repeatability; thus, they appear to be suitable outcome measures to monitor mesopic visual function in clinical practice or trials. RP subjects with reduced mesopic VA and no perifoveal rod function had a greater loss of sensitivity for S-cones than for L-/M-cones.
- Published
- 2020