Search

Background: Central venous catheter-related infections are a significant medical problem. Improved preventive measures are needed.Objective: To ascertain 1) effectiveness of a second-generation antiseptic-coated catheter in the prevention of microbial colonization and infection; 2) safety and tolerability of this device; 3) microbiology of infected catheters; and 4) propensity for the development of antiseptic resistance.Design: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.Setting: 9 university-affiliated medical centers.Patients: 780 patients in intensive care units who required central venous catheterization.Intervention: Patients received either a standard catheter or a catheter coated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine.Measurements: The authors assessed catheter colonization and catheter-related infection, characterized microbes by molecular typing, and determined their susceptibility to antiseptics. Patient tolerance of the catheter was monitored.Results: Patients with the 2 types of catheters had similar demographic features, clinical interventions, laboratory values, and risk factors for infection. Antiseptic catheters were less likely to be colonized at the time of removal compared with control catheters (13.3 vs. 24.1 colonized catheters per 1000 catheter-days; P < 0.01). The center-stratified Cox regression hazard ratio for colonization controlling for sampling design and potentially confounding variables was 0.45 (95% CI, 0.25 to 0.78). The rate of definitive catheter-related bloodstream infection was 1.24 per 1000 catheter-days (CI, 0.26 to 3.62 per 1000 catheter-days) for the control group versus 0.42 per 1000 catheter-days (CI, 0.01 to 2.34 per 1000 catheter-days) for the antiseptic catheter group (P = 0.6). Coagulase-negative staphylococci and other gram-positive organisms were the most frequent microbes to colonize catheters. Noninfectious adverse events were similar in both groups. Antiseptic susceptibility was similar for microbes recovered from either group.Limitations: The antiseptic catheter was not compared with an antibiotic-coated catheter, and no conclusion can be made regarding its effect on bloodstream infection.Conclusions: The second-generation chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine catheter is well tolerated. Antiseptic coating appears to reduce microbial colonization of the catheter compared with an uncoated catheter. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

These guidelines have been developed for practitioners who insert catheters and for persons responsible for surveillance and control of infections in hospital, outpatient, and home health-care settings. This report was prepared by a working group comprising members from professional organizations representing the disciplines of critical care medicine, infectious diseases, health-care infection control, surgery, anesthesiology, interventional radiology, pulmonary medicine, pediatric medicine, and nursing. The working group was led by the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), in collaboration with the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA), Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA), Surgical Infection Society (SIS), American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), American Thoracic Society (ATS), American Society of Critical Care Anesthesiologists (ASCCA), Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC), Infusion Nurses Society (INS), Oncology Nursing Society (ONS), Society of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology (SCVIR), American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and is intended to replace the Guideline for Prevention of Intravascular Device-Related Infections published in 1996. These guidelines are intended to provide evidence-based recommendations for preventing catheter-related infections. Major areas of emphasis include 1) educating and training health-care providers who insert and maintain catheters; 2) using maximal sterile barrier precautions during central venous catheter insertion; 3) using a 2% chlorhexidine preparation for skin antisepsis; 4) avoiding routine replacement of central venous catheters as a strategy to prevent infection; and 5) using antiseptic/antibiotic impregnated short-term central venous catheters if the rate of infection is high despite adherence to other strategies (i.e., education and training, maximal sterile barrier precautions, and 2% chlorhexidine for skin antisepsis). These guidelines also identify performance indicators that can be used locally by health-care institutions or organizations to monitor their success in implementing these evidence-based recommendations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess the risk associated with midline catheter use in hospitalized patients.Design: Prospective, consecutive enrollment.Setting: A 719-bed university-affiliated hospital.Patients: Patients were enrolled if they were likely to require at least 7 days of intravascular catheterization while hospitalized.Measurements: Patients were monitored for adverse reactions. Catheter segment, insertion site, hub, infusate, and blood cultures were assessed.Results: From February 1993 through June 1994, 251 Landmark midline catheters were inserted in 238 patients. One hundred forty catheter cultures were obtained from 130 patients who remained hospitalized for the duration of catheterization. For these 130 patients, the mean duration of catheterization was 9 days, the incidence of catheter colonization was 5.0 per 1000 catheter days, and the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection was 0.8 per 1000 catheter days. During the study period, two severe, unexpected adverse reactions occurred that may have been associated with the use of Landmark midline catheters; no such reactions were associated with the insertion of 58,580 Teflon peripheral catheters (P < 0.00001; exact 95% lower bound of the odds ratio, 68.9). Fifty-three similar reactions associated with Landmark midline catheters, including two deaths, have been reported to the Food and Drug Administration through June 1994.Conclusion: The risk for midline catheter-related infection is low. However, Landmark midline catheters are associated with life-threatening adverse reactions that are probably attributable to the catheter material itself. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Bloodstream infection related to short-term use of noncuffed central venous catheters is a common and serious problem. Technologic innovations to reduce the risk for these infections are needed.Objective: To determine 1) the efficacy of a novel antiseptic catheter in preventing central venous catheter-related infection, 2) patient tolerance of this catheter, and 3) the sources of bloodstream infection originating from noncuffed, multilumen central venous catheters.Design: Randomized, controlled clinical trial.Setting: Medical-surgical intensive care unit of a 450-bed university hospital.Participants: 158 adults scheduled to receive a central venous catheter; 403 catheters were studied.Intervention: Participants received either a standard triple-lumen polyurethane catheter or a catheter that was indistinguishable from the standard catheter and was impregnated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine.Measurements: Catheters were studied for colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infection at removal; local and systemic effects of catheters were assessed. The origin of each catheter-associated bloodstream infection was sought by culturing all potential sources (skin, catheter segments, hubs, and infusate) and confirmed by restriction-fragment DNA subtyping.Results: Antiseptic catheters were less likely to be colonized at removal than control catheters (13.5 compared with 24.1 colonized catheters per 100 catheters; relative risk, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.36 to 0.89]; P = 0.005) and were nearly fivefold less likely to produce bloodstream infection (1.0 compared with 4.7 infections per 100 catheters; 1.6 compared with 7.6 infections per 1000 catheter-days; relative risk, 0.21 [CI, 0.03 to 0.95]; P = 0.03). In the control group, 8 catheter-related bloodstream infections were caused by Staphylococcus aureus, gram-negative bacilli, enterococci, or Candida species; no infections with these organisms occurred in the antiseptic catheter group (P = 0.003). No adverse effects from the antiseptic catheter were seen, and none of the 122 isolates obtained from infected catheters in either group showed in vitro resistance to chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine. Cost-benefit analysis indicated that the antiseptic catheter should prove cost-beneficial if an institution's rate of catheter-related bacteremia with noncuffed central venous catheters is at least 3 infections per 1000 catheter-days).Conclusions: The chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine catheter is well tolerated, reduces the incidence of catheter-related infection, extends the time that noncuffed central venous catheters can be safely left in place for the short term, and should allow cost savings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Why heparin flushes aren't ideal for minimizing intravascular catheter-related infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To examine practices of providers and nursing staff in evaluating febrile patients and identify drivers of excessive diagnostic testing., Design: Prospective multiple-choice surveys., Setting: Inpatient areas and the Emergency Department at Rhode Island Hospital (RIH) in Providence, RI., Participants & Methods: We conducted two surveys focused on the evaluation of febrile inpatients at RIH. One survey was of providers trained in internal medicine, surgery, pediatrics, emergency medicine, and neurology; the other survey was of nursing staff (registered nurses and certified nursing assistants), in inpatient areas and the emergency department., Results: 70 providers (9%) and 178 nursing staff (12%) completed the surveys. 64% of providers (n = 43) reported "always" or "often" ordering full fever workups and 67% of providers (n = 47) reported "always" or "often" physically evaluating febrile patients. Nurses were less likely than providers to report that providers "always" or "often" physically evaluate febrile patients (n = 80, 45%; P < 0.01) and more likely to report providers "always" or "often" order full fever workups (n = 135, 76%; P = 0.04). 71% of providers (n = 50) reported "always" or "often" receiving written handoffs. 86% of providers (n = 60) reported handoffs are "always" or "often" accurate; however, only 17% of providers responded these were "always" accurate. 77% of providers (n = 54) reported "always" or "often" following handoff instructions to obtain a full fever workup for febrile patients, regardless of clinical status. Responses differed significantly by unit type and provider specialty and position., Conclusions: This study elucidates drivers of inefficient and excessive utilization of diagnostic studies and identifies targets for diagnostic stewardship interventions., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose and have completed ICMJE forms for disclosure of potential conflicts of Interest., (© The Author(s) 2024.)

Background: The incidence of spine infections has increased due to the surge in injection drug use driven by the opioid epidemic. Few recent studies have evaluated the microbiology of spinal epidural infections among people who inject drugs compared to the microbiology of such infections among the general population., Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review to identify patients with a spinal epidural abscess or phlegmon unrelated to recent spine surgery between 2015 and 2023., Results: Of 346 initial records, 277 met inclusion criteria for demographic analyses. Of the 229 patients with microbiologic results, details regarding possible drug use were available in 227 patients. Patients with no documented history of drug use were categorized as non-PWUD, while patients who use drugs (PWUD) were separated based on whether drug use was active or not. Patients with prior histories of injection or noninjection drug use were categorized as nonactive PWUD, while those with injection or snorting drug use reported in the past 3 months were categorized as active PWUD. Thirty-nine percent of patients with spinal epidural infection had substance use disorder. Most patients with monomicrobial cultures were infected with gram-positive, aerobic bacteria (86%). Active PWUD were more likely to have methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus compared to non-PWUD (36% vs 13%, respectively, P = .002). Nonactive PWUD were more likely to have non- Escherichia coli gram-negative bacterial infections than non-PWUD (18% and 4.4%, respectively, P = .01)., Conclusions: More than 1 in 3 patients with a spinal epidural infection unrelated to recent surgery had substance use disorder. These patients are more likely to have infections due to MRSA and gram-negative bacteria other than E coli such as Serratia marcescens ., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. L. A. M. is on the scientific advisory board of Citius Pharma and Destiny Pharma and serves as a consultant for CorMedix and Lightline Medical. All other authors report no potential conflicts., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: Nosocomial bloodstream infections associated with intravascular catheters pose significant financial burden, morbidity, and mortality. There is much debate about whether or not blood cultures should be drawn through central venous catheters, and while guidelines advocate for catheter-drawn cultures when catheter infection is suspected, there is variable practice in this regard., Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study assessing episodes of positive catheter-drawn blood cultures with concomitant negative percutaneously-drawn cultures in tertiary care hospitals in the United States and Spain., Results: We identified 143 episodes in 122 patients meeting inclusion criteria. Thirty percent of such episodes revealed growth of potential pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus . Overall, 21% of follow-up percutaneously-drawn blood cultures obtained within 48 hours revealed growth of the same microbe after an episode of positive catheter-drawn blood cultures with negative concomitant percutaneously-drawn cultures (33% when potential pathogens were isolated; 16% when common skin contaminants were isolated). Patients with cultures growing pathogenic organisms were more likely to receive targeted antimicrobial therapy and have their catheters removed sooner., Conclusions: Many episodes of positive catheter-drawn blood cultures with concomitant negative percutaneously-drawn cultures lead to growth from percutaneously-drawn follow-up blood cultures. Thus, such initial discordant results should not be disregarded. Our findings advocate for a nuanced approach to blood culture interpretation, emphasizing the value of catheter-drawn blood cultures in clinical decision making and management., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. L. A. M. serves on the scientific advisory board of Citius Pharma and is a consultant for CorMedix. J. L. D. P. has given conferences sponsored by Pfizer, MSD, Angelini, Shionogi, and Gilead. All other authors report no potential conflicts., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

There is no practical way to definitively diagnose a catheter-related bloodstream infection in situ if blood cultures are only obtained percutaneously unless there is the rare occurrence of purulent drainage from a central venous catheter insertion site. That is why the Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines for diagnosis and management of catheter-related bloodstream infections and Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines for evaluation of fever in critically ill patients both recommend drawing blood cultures from a central venous catheter and percutaneously if the catheter is a suspected source of infection. However, central venous catheter-drawn blood cultures may be more likely to be positive reflecting catheter hub, connector, or intraluminal colonization, and many hospitals in the United States discourage blood culture collection from catheters in an effort to reduce reporting of central-line associated bloodstream infections to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. As such, clinical decisions are made regarding catheter removal or other therapeutic interventions based on incomplete and potentially inaccurate data. We urge clinicians to obtain catheter-drawn blood cultures when the catheter may be the source of suspected infection., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. Dr. Mermel is on the Scientific Advisory Board of Citius Pharma and serves as a consultant for CorMedix. Dr. Rupp has received research funding from Magnolia Medical Technologies, Contrafect, and NIH/Duke Clinical Research Institute and has served as a consultant or on an advisory board for Citius Pharmaceuticals, 3M, and Teleflex., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

External ventricular drains (EVDs) are medical devices that are inserted into the ventricles of the brain to drain excess fluid, manage intracranial hypertension, monitor intracranial pressure, and administer medications. Unintentional disconnections and breaks or fractures (breaks) of EVDs or associated drainage system components can result in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage and increased risk for EVD-associated infections. After replacement of Integra Life Sciences EVD systems with Medtronic Duet EVD systems at Rhode Island Hospital in mid-September 2023, a threefold increase was observed in the prevalence of positive CSF cultures, from 2.8 per 1,000 days with an EVD in place (EVD days) during January-September 2023 to 11.4 per 1,000 EVD days during October 2023-January 2024 (rate ratio [RR] = 5.7; 95% CI = 1.5-22.0; p = 0.01) and an eightfold increase in the prevalence of infections, from 0.7 to 6.5 per 1,000 EVD days (RR = 9.8; 95% CI = 1.1-87.3; p = 0.04). An investigation by Rhode Island Hospital Infection Control during December 2023-January 2024 identified frequent reports of disconnections and breaks of the Medtronic Duet EVD system. A search of the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database identified 326 reports nationwide of disconnection and breaks of components of the Duet EVD system, including 175 during 2023. A Medical Product Safety Network report was filed. The Duet EVD product was ultimately recalled in January 2024, citing disconnections of the EVD system and reports of CSF leakage and infection. Given the widespread use of EVD systems by neurosurgery centers and the risk for EVD-associated infections, a strategy for future consideration by hospital infection prevention and control programs might be inclusion of EVD-associated infections in hospital surveillance programs to rapidly identify increases in these events and determine factors related to such infections to prevent additional infections., Competing Interests: All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

There are over 8 million central venous access devices inserted each year, many in patients with chronic conditions who rely on central access for life-preserving therapies. Central venous access device-related complications can be life-threatening and add tens of billions of dollars to health care costs, while their incidence is most likely grossly mis- or underreported by medical institutions. In this communication, we review the challenges that impair retention, exchange, and analysis of data necessary for a meaningful understanding of critical events and outcomes in this clinical domain. The difficulty is not only with data extraction and harmonization from electronic health records, national surveillance systems, or other health information repositories where data might be stored. The problem is that reliable and appropriate data are not recorded, or falsely recorded, at least in part because policy, payment, penalties, proprietary concerns, and workflow burdens discourage completeness and accuracy. We provide a roadmap for the development of health care information systems and infrastructure that address these challenges, framed within the context of research studies that build a framework of standardized terminology, decision support, data capture, and information exchange necessary for the task. This roadmap is embedded in a broader Coordinated Registry Network Learning Community, and facilitated by the Medical Device Epidemiology Network, a Public-Private Partnership sponsored by the US Food and Drug Administration, with the scope of advancing methods, national and international infrastructure, and partnerships needed for the evaluation of medical devices throughout their total life cycle., (©Andrea Iorga, Marti J Velezis, Danica Marinac-Dabic, Robert F Lario, Stanley M Huff, Beth Gore, Leonard A Mermel, L Charles Bailey, Julia Skapik, Debi Willis, Robert E Lee, Frank P Hurst, Laura E Gressler, Terrie L Reed, Richard Towbin, Kevin M Baskin. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 24.11.2023.)

Since the initial publication of A Compendium of Strategies to Prevent Healthcare-Associated Infections in Acute Care Hospitals in 2008, the prevention of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) has continued to be a national priority. Progress in healthcare epidemiology, infection prevention, antimicrobial stewardship, and implementation science research has led to improvements in our understanding of effective strategies for HAI prevention. Despite these advances, HAIs continue to affect ∼1 of every 31 hospitalized patients, leading to substantial morbidity, mortality, and excess healthcare expenditures, and persistent gaps remain between what is recommended and what is practiced.The widespread impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on HAI outcomes in acute-care hospitals has further highlighted the essential role of infection prevention programs and the critical importance of prioritizing efforts that can be sustained even in the face of resource requirements from COVID-19 and future infectious diseases crises.The Compendium: 2022 Updates document provides acute-care hospitals with up-to-date, practical expert guidance to assist in prioritizing and implementing HAI prevention efforts. It is the product of a highly collaborative effort led by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA), the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA), the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC), the American Hospital Association (AHA), and The Joint Commission, with major contributions from representatives of organizations and societies with content expertise, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Pediatric Infectious Disease Society (PIDS), the Society for Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), the Society for Hospital Medicine (SHM), the Surgical Infection Society (SIS), and others.

From April 1, 2016, through March 31, 2022, growth of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia from clinical specimens at our academic medical center was significantly more likely during July-September than during other calendar quarters.

Objective: The primary aim of this retrospective study was to assess differences in the pathogens causing surgical site infections (SSIs) following craniectomies/craniotomies and open spinal surgery. The secondary aim was to assess differences in rates of SSI among these operative procedures., Methods: ANOVA tests with Bonferroni correction and incidence risk ratios (RRs) were used to identify differences in pathogens by surgical site and procedure using retrospective, de-identified records of 19,993 postneurosurgical patients treated between 2007 and 2020., Results: The overall infection rates for craniotomy/craniectomy, laminectomy, and fusion were 2.1%, 1.1%, and 1.5%, respectively, and overall infection rates for cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine surgery were 0.3%, 1.6%, and 1.9%, respectively. Craniotomy/craniectomy was more likely to result in an SSI than spine surgery (RR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4-2.2, p < 0.0001). Cutibacterium acnes (RR 24.2, 95% CI 7.3-80.0, p < 0.0001); coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (methicillin-susceptible CoNS: RR 2.9, 95% CI 1.6-5.4, p = 0.0006; methicillin-resistant CoNS: RR 5.6, 95% CI 1.4-22.3, p = 0.02); Klebsiella aerogenes (RR 6.5, 95% CI 1.7-25.1, p = 0.0003); Serratia marcescens (RR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1-7.1, p = 0.01); Enterobacter cloacae (RR 3.1, 95% CI 1.2-8.1, p = 0.02); and Candida albicans (RR 3.9, 95% CI 1.2-12.3, p = 0.02) were more commonly associated with craniotomy/craniectomy cases than fusion or laminectomy SSIs. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was more commonly associated with fusion SSIs than craniotomy SSIs (RR 4.4, 95% CI 1.3-14.8, p = 0.02), whereas Escherichia coli was nonsignificantly associated with fusion SSIs compared to craniotomy SSIs (RR 4.1, 95% CI 0.9-18.1, p = 0.06). Infections with E. coli and P. aeruginosa occurred primarily in the lumbar spine (p = 0.0003 and p = 0.0001, respectively)., Conclusions: SSIs due to typical gastrointestinal or genitourinary gram-negative bacteria occur most commonly following lumbar surgery, particularly fusion, and are likely to be due to contamination of the surgical bed with microbial flora in the perianal area and genitourinary tract. Cutibacterium acnes in the skin flora of the head and neck increases risk of infection due to this microbe following surgical interventions in these body sites. The types of gram-negative bacteria associated with craniotomy/craniectomy SSIs suggest potential environmental sources of these pathogens. Based on the authors' findings, neurosurgeons should consider using a two-step skin preparation with benzoyl peroxide, in addition to a standard antiseptic such as alcoholic chlorhexidine for cranial, cervical, and upper thoracic surgeries. Additionally, broader gram-negative bacterial coverage, such as use of a third-generation cephalosporin, should be considered for lumbar/lumbosacral fusion surgical antibiotic prophylaxis.

Background: Prompt diagnosis of breast implant infection is critical to reducing morbidity. A high incidence of false-negative microbial culture mandates superior testing modalities. Alpha defensin-1 (AD-1), an infection biomarker, has outperformed culture in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection with sensitivity/specificity of 97%. After previously demonstrating its feasibility in breast implant-related infection (BIRI), this case-control study compares the accuracy of AD-1 to microbial culture in suspected BIRI., Methods: An institutional review board-approved, prospective, multicenter study was conducted of adults with prior breast implant reconstruction undergoing surgery for suspected infection (cases) or prosthetic exchange/revision (controls). Demographics, perioperative characteristics, antibiotic exposure, and implant pocket fluid were collected. Fluid samples underwent microbial culture, AD-1 assay, and adjunctive markers (C-reactive protein, lactate, cell differential); diagnostic performance was assessed by means of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy from receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, with values of P < 0.05 considered significant., Results: Fifty-three implant pocket samples were included (cases, n = 20; controls, n = 33). All 20 patients with suspected BIRI exhibited cellulitis, 65% had abnormal drainage, and 55% were febrile. All suspected BIRIs were AD-1 positive (sensitivity, 100%). Microbial culture failed to grow any microorganisms in four BIRIs (sensitivity, 80%; P = 0.046); Gram stain was least accurate (sensitivity, 25%; P < 0.001). All tests demonstrated 100% specificity. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses yielded the following areas under the curve: AD-1, 1.0; microbial culture, 0.90 ( P = 0.029); and Gram stain, 0.62 ( P < 0.001). Adjunctive markers were significantly higher among infections versus controls ( P < 0.001)., Conclusions: Study findings confirm the accuracy of AD-1 in diagnosing BIRI and indicate superiority to microbial culture. Although further study is warranted, AD-1 may facilitate perioperative decision-making in BIRI management in a resource-efficient manner., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Diagnostic, II., (Copyright © 2022 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Background: Contamination of ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VPS) by cutaneous flora, particularly coagulase-negative staphylococci, is a common cause of shunt infection and failure, leading to prolonged hospital stay, higher costs of care, and poor outcomes. Glove contamination may occur during VPS insertion, increasing risk of such infections., Methods: We performed a systematic search of the PubMed database for studies published January 1, 1970, through August 31, 2021 that documented VPS infection rates before and after implementing a practice of double gloving with change or removal of the outer glove immediately prior to shunt insertion., Results: Among 272 reports screened, 4 were eligible for review based on our inclusion criteria. The incidence of VPS infection was reduced in all 4 quasi-experimental studies with an aggregate incidence of VPS infection of 11.8% before the change in intraoperative protocol and 4.9% after protocol change. One study documented reduced hospital stay with this change in protocol., Conclusion: The risk of VPS infection is reduced by removal or replacement of the outer surgical gloves immediately prior to intraoperative insertion of a VPS as part of an infection control bundle.

Purpose: Penetrating traumatic brain injury (pTBI) is an acute medical emergency with a high rate of mortality. Patients with survivable injuries face a risk of infection stemming from foreign body transgression into the central nervous system (CNS). There is controversy regarding the utility of antimicrobial prophylaxis in managing such patients, and if so, which antimicrobial agent(s) to use., Methods: We reviewed patients with pTBI at our institution and performed a PRISMA systematic review to assess the impact of prophylactic antibiotics on reducing risk of CNS infection., Results: We identified 21 local patients and 327 cases in the literature. In our local series, 17 local patients received prophylactic antibiotics; four did not. Overall, five of these patients (24%) developed a CNS infection (four and one case of intraparenchymal brain abscess and meningitis, respectively). All four patients who did not receive prophylactic antibiotics developed an infection (three with CNS infections; one superficial wound infection) compared to two of 17 (12%) patients who did receive prophylactic antibiotics. Of the 327 pTBI cases reported in the literature, 216 (66%) received prophylactic antibiotics. Thirty-eight (17%) patients who received antibiotics developed a CNS infection compared to 21 (19%) who did not receive antibiotics (p = 0.76)., Conclusions: Although our review of the literature did not reveal any benefit, our institutional series suggested that patients with pTBI may benefit from prophylactic antibiotics. We propose a short antibiotic course with a regimen specific to cases with and without the presence of organic debris., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: The anatomic site for central venous catheter insertion influences the risk of central venous catheter-related intravascular complications. We developed and validated a predictive score of required catheter dwell time to identify critically ill patients at higher risk of intravascular complications., Methods: We retrospectively conducted a cohort study from three multicenter randomized controlled trials enrolling consecutive patients requiring central venous catheterization. The primary outcome was the required catheter dwell time, defined as the period between the first catheter insertion and removal of the last catheter for absence of utility. Predictors were identified in the training cohort (3SITES trial; 2336 patients) through multivariable analyses based on the subdistribution hazard function accounting for death as a competing event. Internal validation was performed in the training cohort by 500 bootstraps to derive the CVC-IN score from robust risk factors. External validation of the CVC-IN score were performed in the testing cohort (CLEAN, and DRESSING2; 2371 patients)., Results: The analysis was restricted to patients requiring mechanical ventilation to comply with model assumptions. Immunosuppression (2 points), high creatinine > 100 micromol/L (2 points), use of vasopressor (1 point), obesity (1 point) and older age (40-59, 1 point; ≥ 60, 2 points) were independently associated with the required catheter dwell time. At day 28, area under the ROC curve for the CVC-IN score was 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.66-0.72] in the training cohort and 0.64, 95% CI [0.61-0.66] in the testing cohort. Patients with a CVC-IN score ≥ 4 in the overall cohort had a median required catheter dwell time of 24 days (versus 11 days for CVC-IN score < 4 points). The positive predictive value of a CVC-IN score ≥ 4 was 76.9% for > 7 days required catheter dwell time in the testing cohort., Conclusion: The CVC-IN score, which can be used for the first catheter, had a modest ability to discriminate required catheter dwell time. Nevertheless, preference of the subclavian site may contribute to limit the risk of intravascular complications, in particular among ventilated patients with high CVC-IN score. Trials Registration NCT01479153, NCT01629550, NCT01189682., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Insertion of an external ventricular drain (EVD) is a common neurosurgical procedure which may lead to serious complications including infection. Some risk factors associated with EVD infection are well established. Others remain less certain, including specific indications for placement, prior neurosurgery, and prior EVD placement., Objective: To identify risk factors for EVD infections., Methods: We reviewed all EVD insertions at our institution from March 2015 through May 2019 following implementation of a standardized infection control protocol for EVD insertion and maintenance. Cox regression was used to identify risk factors for EVD infections., Results: 479 EVDs placed in 409 patients met inclusion criteria, and 9 culture-positive infections were observed during the study period. The risk of infection within 30 days of EVD placement was 2.2% (2.3 infections/1,000 EVD days). Coagulase-negative staphylococci were identified in 6 of the 9 EVD infections). EVD infection led to prolonged length of stay post-EVD-placement (23 days vs 16 days; P = .045). Cox regression demonstrated increased infection risk in patients with prior brain surgery associated with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion (HR, 8.08; 95% CI, 1.7-39.4; P = .010), CSF leak around the catheter (HR, 21.0; 95% CI, 7.0-145.1; P = .0007), and insertion site dehiscence (HR, 7.53; 95% CI, 1.04-37.1; P = .0407). Duration of EVD use >7 days was not associated with infection risk (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.07-5.45; P = .669)., Conclusion: Risk factors associated with EVD infection include prior brain surgery, CSF leak, and insertion site dehiscence. We found no significant association between infection risk and duration of EVD placement.

Background: Use of PICCs has been rising since 2001. They are used when long-term intravenous access is needed and for blood draws in patients with difficult venous access., Objective: To determine which risk factors contribute to inappropriate PICC line insertion defined as removal of a PICC within five days of insertion for reasons other than a PICC complication., Design: Retrospective, observational study., Setting: Tertiary-care, Level 1 trauma center., Patients: Adult patients with a PICC removed 1/1/2017 to 5/4/2020., Measurements: Frequency of PICC removal within five days of insertion and associated risk factors for early removal., Results: Between 1/1/2017 and 5/4/2020, 995 of 5348 PICCs inserted by the IV nursing team were removed within five days (19%). In 2017, 5 of 429 PICCs developed a central line-associated infection (1.2%) and 29 of 429 PICCs developed symptomatic venous thromboembolism (6.7%). Patients with PICCs whose primary service was in an ICU were independently at higher risk of early removal (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.14, 1.83); weekday insertion was independently associated with a lower likelihood of early removal compared to weekend insertion (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.49, 0.75)., Limitation: PICC removal after discharge was not assessed and paper records were likely incomplete and biased., Conclusion: Nearly one in five PICCs were removed within five days. Patients whose primary team was in an ICU and PICCs ordered on weekends were at independently higher risk of early removal., Competing Interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Dr. Mermel serves as a consultant for Light Line Medical Citius Pharmaceutical, and Destiny Pharma. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. The other authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Background: The majority of central venous catheters (CVC) removed in the ICU are not colonized, including when a catheter-related infection (CRI) is suspected. We developed and validated a predictive score to reduce unnecessary CVC removal., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study from five multicenter randomized controlled trials with systematic catheter-tip culture of consecutive CVCs. Colonization was defined as growth of ≥10 3 colony-forming units per mL. Risk factors for colonization were identified in the training cohort (CATHEDIA and 3SITES trials; 3899 CVCs of which 575 (15%) were colonized) through multivariable analyses. After internal validation in 500 bootstrapped samples, the CVC-OUT score was computed by attaching points to the robust (> 50% of the bootstraps) risk factors. External validation was performed in the testing cohort (CLEAN, DRESSING2 and ELVIS trials; 6848 CVCs, of which 588 (9%) were colonized)., Results: In the training cohort, obesity (1 point), diabetes (1 point), type of CVC (dialysis catheter, 1 point), anatomical insertion site (jugular, 4 points; femoral 5 points), rank of the catheter (second or subsequent, 1 point) and catheterization duration (≥ 5 days, 2 points) were significantly and independently associated with colonization . Area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the CVC-OUT score was 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.67-0.72]. In the testing cohort, AUC for the CVC-OUT score was 0.60, 95% CI [0.58-0.62]. Among 1,469 CVCs removed for suspected CRI in the overall population, 1200 (82%) were not colonized. The negative predictive value (NPV) of a CVC-OUT score < 6 points was 94%, 95% CI [93%-95%]., Conclusion: The CVC-OUT score had a moderate ability to discriminate catheter-tip colonization, but the high NPV may contribute to reduce unnecessary CVCs removal. Preference of the subclavian site is the strongest and only modifiable risk factor that reduces the likelihood of catheter-tip colonization and consequently the risk of CRI., Clinical Trials Registration: NCT00277888, NCT01479153, NCT01629550, NCT01189682, NCT00875069., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

In the past 30 years, midline catheter use has grown rapidly. For several reasons, many providers and facilities are attempting to reduce the number of central venous catheters and subsequent central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) by using midline catheters. Vessel preservation requires attention to all vascular access device (VAD)-associated complications and not only central line bloodstream infection. There is still much confusion about the appropriate tip location and the characteristics of fluids and medications that can safely be infused through a midline catheter residing in a peripheral vein. The Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice (the Standards) focuses on assessment of characteristics of infusion therapies that must be considered for VAD selection as an evidence-based list of fluids and medications for infusion through peripheral veins has yet to be established. This review of midline catheter studies evaluates the evidence regarding the substitution of a midline catheter for a central venous catheter. Many issues need to be addressed, such as studies that include an outcome list that mixes defined clinical complications (eg, thrombosis) with signs and symptoms of complications (eg, leaking). Another issue is basing a major change of clinical practice on retrospective chart reviews. Although a midline catheter may be appropriate for some patients, additional studies of a higher level of evidence are needed before this major practice change should occur., (Copyright © 2022 Infusion Nurses Society.)

Introduction: Approaches to COVID-19 mitigation can be more efficiently delivered with a more detailed understanding of where the severe cases occur. Our objective was to assess which demographic, housing and neighborhood characteristics were independently and collectively associated with differing rates of severe COVID-19., Methods: A cohort of patients with SARS-CoV-2 in a single health system from March 1, 2020 to February 15, 2021 was reviewed to determine whether demographic, housing, or neighborhood characteristics are associated with higher rates of severe COVID-19 infections and to create a novel scoring index. Characteristics included proportion of multifamily homes, essential workers, and ages of the homes within neighborhoods., Results: There were 735 COVID-19 ICU admissions in the study interval which accounted for 61 percent of the state's ICU admissions for COVID-19. Compared to the general population of the state those admitted to the ICU with COVID-19 were disproportionately older, male sex, and were more often Black, Indigenous, People of Color. Patients disproportionately resided in neighborhoods with three plus unit multifamily homes, homes built before 1940, homes with more than one person to a room, homes of lower average value, and in neighborhoods with a greater proportion of essential workers. From this our COVID-19 Neighborhood Index value was comparatively higher for the ICU patients (61.1) relative to the population of Rhode Island (49.4)., Conclusion: COVID-19-related ICU admissions are highly related to demographic, housing and neighborhood-level factors. This may guide more nuanced and targeted vaccine distribution plans and public health measures for future pandemics., Competing Interests: None., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Background: Intravenous catheters are common and essential devices within medical practice. Their placement can be difficult, leading to application of several technologies to improve success. Functionally expanding catheters were once an exciting technology, derailed clinically by hypersensitivity reactions. The exact cause of reactions, attributed to Aquavene catheter materials, remains unknown., Aims: To reinvestigate functionally expanding intravenous catheters., Materials and Methods: The history of the functionally expanding intravenous catheter is presented here along with its utility in current medical practice, potential for further investigation, and possible redesign of these once promising devices., Results: This review demonstrates clinical utility and a lack of definitive cause for failure of the previous functionally expanding intravenous catheter design. As Aquavene materials themselves are commonly considered the cause of hypersensitivity reactions which removed expanding intravenous catheters from the market, this review found several possible substitutes for this material for use in any redesign., Discussion and Conclusion: The functionally expanding intravenous catheter failed due to hypersensitivity reactions in patients. Alternative materials exist for a possible redesign on this once promising clinical product., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (© 2021 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought more widespread attention to the basic reproductive number (R o ), an epidemiologic measurement. A lesser-known measure of virologic infectivity is the particle-to-plaque ratio (P:PFU). We suggest that comparison between the two parameters may assist in better understanding viral transmission dynamics.

Objectives: Health disparities are associated with poor outcomes related to public health. The objective of this study was to assess health disparities associated with influenza infection based on median household income and educational attainment., Methods: We geocoded people with documented confirmed influenza infection by home address to identify the US Census 2010 tract in which they lived during 4 influenza surveillance seasons (2013-2014, 2015-2016, 2016-2017, and 2017-2018) in Rhode Island. We dichotomized influenza as severe if the person with influenza infection was hospitalized (ie, inpatient) or as nonsevere if the person was not hospitalized (ie, outpatient). We examined 2 socioeconomic factors: median household income (defined as low, medium low, medium high, and high) and educational attainment (defined as a ratio among people who completed