Search

El compromiso académico es un concepto fundamental para explicar el rendimiento académico en universitarios, especialmente en estudios como el grado de maestro, que forma estudiantes para una profesión altamente vocacional. Asimismo, el actual sistema para formar maestros de educación musical mediante la mención plantea algunas ambivalencias respecto al compromiso de dichos estudiantes. Así, nuestro objetivo es comparar el compromiso académico y algunas variables facilitadoras y obstaculizadoras del mismo, en alumnado de esta mención con alumnado del resto de grados de maestro, con el objetivo de proponer acciones que redunden en un mayor aprovechamiento de estos estudios. Para ello se ha realizado un estudio exploratorio prospectivo de carácter transversal que combina metodología descriptiva y correlacional, con datos obtenidos a partir de distintos cuestionarios. La muestra estuvo formada por 610 alumnos de la UB. Los resultados más significativos que diferencian ambos grupos se encuentran, por una parte, en las variables facilitadoras del compromiso académico (estrategias de afrontamiento, y motivación académica), así como en las variables obstaculizadoras (estrés percibido y malestar psicológico). Con todo ello se plantean acciones para mejorar y complementar el plan de acción tutorial de los maestros de educación musical, y, por consiguiente, mejorar el compromiso académico de estos estudiantes.

Abstract Background Stenosis is one of the most common complications in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD). Endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) is the treatment of choice for a short stenosis adjacent to the anastomosis from previous surgery. Self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) may be a suitable treatment option for longer stenoses. To date, however, there is no scientific evidence as to whether endoscopic (EBD/SEMS) or surgical treatment is the best approach for de novo or primary stenoses that are less than 10 cm in length. Methods/design Exploratory study as “proof-of-concept”, multicentre, open-label, randomized trial of the treatment of de novo stenosis in the CD; endoscopic treatment (EBD/SEMS) vs surgical resection (SR). The type of endoscopic treatment will initially be with EDB; if a therapeutic failure occurs, then a SEMS will be placed. We estimate 2 years of recruitment and 1 year of follow-up for the assessment of quality of life, costs, complications, and clinical recurrence. After the end of the study, patients will be followed up for 3 years to re-evaluate the variables over the long term. Forty patients with de novo stenosis in CD will be recruited from 15 hospitals in Spain and will be randomly assigned to the endoscopic or surgical treatment groups. The primary aim will be the evaluation of the patient quality of life at 1 year follow-up (% of patients with an increase of 30 points in the 32-item Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ-32). The secondary aim will be evaluation of the clinical recurrence rate, complications, and costs of both treatments at 1-year follow-up. Discussion The ENDOCIR trial has been designed to determine whether an endoscopic or surgical approach is therapeutically superior in the treatment of de novo stenosis in CD. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 04330846. Registered on 1 April 1 2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/home

Background: Infliximab seems to be the most efficacious of the three available anti-TNF agents for ulcerative colitis (UC) but little is known when it is used as the second anti-TNF. Objectives: To compare the clinical and treatment outcomes of a second subcutaneous or intravenous anti-TNF in UC patients. Design: Retrospective observational study. Methods: Patients from the ENEIDA registry treated consecutively with infliximab and a subcutaneous anti-TNF (or vice versa), naïve to other biological agents, were identified and grouped according to the administration route of the first anti-TNF into IVi (intravenous initially) or SCi (subcutaneous initially). Results: Overall, 473 UC patients were included (330 IVi and 143 SCi). Clinical response at week 14 was 42.7% and 48.3% in the IVi and SCi groups (non-statistically significant), respectively. Clinical remission rates at week 52 were 32.8% and 31.4% in the IVi and SCi groups (nonsignificant differences), respectively. A propensity-matched score analysis showed a higher clinical response rate at week 14 in the SCi group and higher treatment persistence in the IVi group. Regarding long-term outcomes, dose escalation and discontinuation due to the primary failure of the first anti-TNF and more severe disease activity at the beginning of the second anti-TNF were inversely associated with clinical remission. Conclusion: The use of a second anti-TNF for UC seems to be reasonable in terms of efficacy, although it is particularly reduced in the case of the primary failure of the first anti-TNF. Whether the second anti-TNF is infliximab or subcutaneous does not seem to affect efficacy.

Markers that allow for the selection of tailored treatments for individual patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are yet to be identified. Our aim was to describe trends in real-life treatment usage. For this purpose, patients from the ENEIDA registry who received their first targeted IBD treatment (biologics or tofacitinib) between 2015 and 2021 were included. A subsequent analysis with Machine Learning models was performed. The study included 10,009 patients [71% with Crohn’s disease (CD) and 29% with ulcerative colitis (UC)]. In CD, anti-TNF (predominantly adalimumab) were the main agents in the 1st line of treatment (LoT), although their use declined over time. In UC, anti-TNF (mainly infliximab) use was predominant in 1st LoT, remaining stable over time. Ustekinumab and vedolizumab were the most prescribed drugs in 2nd and 3rd LoT in CD and UC, respectively. Overall, the use of biosimilars increased over time. Machine Learning failed to identify a model capable of predicting treatment patterns. In conclusion, drug positioning is different in CD and UC. Anti-TNF were the most used drugs in IBD 1st LoT, being adalimumab predominant in CD and infliximab in UC. Ustekinumab and vedolizumab have gained importance in CD and UC, respectively. The approval of biosimilars had a significant impact on treatment.

BackgroundPrevious studies comparing immigrant ethnic groups and native patients with IBD have yielded clinical and phenotypic differences. To date, no study has focused on the immigrant IBD population in Spain.MethodsProspective, observational, multicenter study comparing cohorts of IBD patients from ENEIDA-registry who were born outside Spain with a cohort of native patients.ResultsWe included 13,524 patients (1,864 immigrant and 11,660 native). The immigrants were younger (45 ± 12 vs. 54 ± 16 years, p < 0.001), had been diagnosed younger (31 ± 12 vs. 36 ± 15 years, p < 0.001), and had a shorter disease duration (14 ± 7 vs. 18 ± 8 years, p < 0.001) than native patients. Family history of IBD (9 vs. 14%, p < 0.001) and smoking (30 vs. 40%, p < 0.001) were more frequent among native patients. The most prevalent ethnic groups among immigrants were Caucasian (41.5%), followed by Latin American (30.8%), Arab (18.3%), and Asian (6.7%). Extraintestinal manifestations, mainly musculoskeletal affections, were more frequent in immigrants (19 vs. 11%, p < 0.001). Use of biologics, mainly anti-TNF, was greater in immigrants (36 vs. 29%, p < 0.001). The risk of having extraintestinal manifestations [OR: 2.23 (1.92–2.58, p < 0.001)] and using biologics [OR: 1.13 (1.0–1.26, p = 0.042)] was independently associated with immigrant status in the multivariate analyses.ConclusionsCompared with native-born patients, first-generation-immigrant IBD patients in Spain were younger at disease onset and showed an increased risk of having extraintestinal manifestations and using biologics. Our study suggests a featured phenotype of immigrant IBD patients in Spain, and constitutes a new landmark in the epidemiological characterization of immigrant IBD populations in Southern Europe.

La música es un potente activador cerebral que implica a una extensa red de estructura neurales corticales, subcorticales y del oído interno para su procesamiento. Estas estructuras no solo intervienen en la práctica musical, sino que también son específicas de otras funciones como la memoria, la emoción o el razonamiento matemático. Por esta razón, la educación musical puede repercutir positivamente no solo en el aprendizaje de un arte en sí mismo como es la música sino también en el desarrollo de competencias clave como la matemática, la lingüística, la interpersonal, etc. El presente artículo es una revisión bibliográfica de tipo multidisciplinar cuyo objetivo es conocer cómo funciona el cerebro musical y cómo la música puede contribuir al desarrollo competencial tanto artístico-cultural como de otras competencias. A partir de dicha revisión se puede concluir que la música puede usarse como un recurso neuroeducativo eficaz para entrenar el cerebro de forma holística y mejorar la interconexión neuronal, lo cual puede beneficiar la formación integral de las personas, así como su bienestar, tanto personal como social. Aun así, cabe seguir indagando sobre la neuroarquitectura musical y su contribución a las neurociencias para conocer con exactitud cómo aprende el cerebro y la importancia de la música como recurso educativo.