Search

Objective Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors provide effective intervention for cardiovascular and renal disease. Changes in angiotensin-(1-7) have been proposed to be involved in the mechanism of action of ACE inhibition (ACEi). In particular, an altered balance between angiotensin II and angiotensin-(1-7) might be involved. A shift in sodium status modifies the activity of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and the effects of ACEi, but its effects on angiotensin(1-7) are unknown. We therefore studied the effect of a shift in sodium intake on angiotensin-(1-7), during placebo and ACEi. Methods A double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in 17 healthy men. The subjects were studied for two 2-week periods: 20 mg/day enalapril and placebo. The first week of each period they used a 50 mmol Na+ diet [low sodium (LS)], the second week a 200 mmol Na+ diet. Angiotensin levels and blood pressure were measured at the end of each week. Results During placebo, LS intake elicited a three-fold rise in ang-(1-7) that paralleled the rise in other components of the renin-angiotensin system. During ACEi LS did not affect angiotensin II, but did induce a clear-cut rise in angiotensin-(1-7) - to the extent that angiotensin-(1-7)was highest during combination of ACEi and LS. Consequently, during ACE LS shifted the balance between angiotensin-(1-7) and angiotensin II towards angiotensin-(1-7). Conclusion The sodium status modifies levels of angiotensin-(1-7). During ACE angiotensin(1-7) is still subject to stimulation by sodium restriction, and provides opportunity for therapeutic manipulation. Exploration of this opportunity in patient populations may lead to strategies to improve therapeutic benefits of ACEL © 2005 Lippincott Williams C Wilkins.

Low dietary sodium (LS) increases the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy in patients and experimental models, but mechanisms underlying this enhanced efficacy are largely unknown. Because the benefits of ACE inhibition are mediated to a considerable extent by their effect on the vasculature, we studied whether low sodium alters the vascular effects of ACE inhibition. Baseline functional and morphological characteristics, and endothelium-dependent and -independent dilatory responses were studied in isolated perfused small intrarenal and mesenteric arteries obtained from control rats (CON), rats on LS, lisinopril-treated rats (CON-LIS), or rats treated with lisinopril during LS (LS-LIS). We found, first, that LS-LIS compared with CON-LIS enhances blood pressure reduction. Second, interlobar renal arteries had increased lumen diameter and reduced adrenergic contractility in CON-LIS compared with CON, without additional effects of LS. In contrast, mesenteric arteries were not altered in CON-LIS compared with CON, but became triggered for increased myogenic and adrenergic constriction in LS-LIS. Third, LS-LIS decreased acetylcholine (ACh)-induced vasodilation in both mesenteric and renal arteries compared with CON-LIS. During the latter condition, opposite prostaglandins are involved in the endothelial function of the two different vascular beds, i.e., increased involvement of contractile prostaglandins in ACh-induced vasodilatation in renal arteries, versus dilatory prostaglandins in mesenteric arteries. Whether cause or consequence of the enhanced blood pressure response, our data demonstrate a modifying effect of dietary sodium on vascular effects of ACE inhibition. These findings provide a rationale for further studies addressing the mechanism-of-actions of our therapies to find additional strategies to improve therapy response.

Background Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade is a cornerstone in cardiovascular protection. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-DD genotype has been associated with resistance to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition (ACEi), but data are conflicting. As sodium intake modifies the effect of ACEi as well as the genotype-phenotype relationship, we hypothesize gene-environment interaction between sodium-status, the response to ACEi, and ACE genotype. Method Thirty-five male volunteers (26 +/- 9 years; II n=6, ID n=18, DD n=11) were studied during placebo and ACEi (double blind, enalapril 20mg/day) on low [7 days 50 mmol Na+/day (low salt)] and high[7 days 200 mmol Na+/day (high salt)] sodium, with a washout of 6 weeks in-between. After each period mean arterial pressure (MAP) was measured before and during graded infusion of angiotensin II (Ang II). Results During high salt, ACEi reduced MAP in II and ID, but not in DD [II: 88 (78-94) versus 76 (72-88); ID: 87 (84-91) versus 83 (79-87); both P

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) provide renoprotection. A low sodium diet enhances their efficacy. However, the added effect of sodium restriction on proteinuria and blood pressure is not invariably associated with better preservation of renal morphology, suggesting that the combination of ACEi with a low sodium diet can elicit renal structural abnormalities. To test this hypothesis, the effects of ACEi in combination with a control (CS) or a low sodium (LS) diet were investigated in healthy rats and in adriamycin nephrotic rats. After 3 weeks of treatment, rats were sacrificed and kidneys examined for renal structural abnormalities. In healthy rats, ACEi reduced blood pressure: the fall in blood pressure was significantly greater in the ACEi/LS group. Renal morphology was normal in the ACEi/CS group but severe interstitial damage was found in the ACEi/LS group. This was associated with increased interstitial macrophage influx and up-regulation of osteopontin, alpha-smooth muscle actin, and collagen III expression. In addition, ACEi/LS induced an increase in the total medial area of afferent arterioles. In nephrotic rats, ACEVLS reduced both blood pressure and proteinuria, whereas only blood pressure was reduced in the ACEi/CS group. Mild interstitial damage was present in the ACEi/CS group but, strikingly, pronounced tubulo-interstitial abnormalities occurred in the ACEi/LS group, similar to those seen in ACEi/LS healthy rats, with similar changes in afferent arteriolar walls. In conclusion, the combination of ACEi/LS elicits pronounced renal interstitial abnormalities in healthy and nephrotic rats, despite a significant reduction of proteinuria in the latter. Considering their occurrence in healthy rats, these renal adverse effects cannot be due to specific characteristics of adriamycin nephrosis. Further studies should elucidate the mechanisms underlying these observations and their impact on long-term renoprotection. Copyright (c) 2006 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

In renal patients rigorous blood pressure control is crucial to prevent renal and cardiovascular target organ damage. For renoprotection target blood pressure depends on the severity of proteinuria before treatment. For proteinuria of 1--3g/day a mean arterial pressure of 98 mmHg provides additional benefit, whereas the target should be as low as 92 mmHg if proteinuria exceeds 3g/day. The antiproteinuric effect of antihypertensive intervention predicts renoprotection; it is therefore recommended that therapy should be titrated not only on blood pressure, but also on reduction of proteinuria. All currently available classes of antihypertensives can be used to reduce blood pressure in renal patients. Interventions based on blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system have additional antiproteinuric, and thus renoprotective, potential. Large individual differences in therapeutic benefit are common, even for interventions of proven efficacy at group level. Studies applying different classes of drugs in the same patient (rotation schedules) demonstrate that individual factors are main determinants of therapy response. Exploration of the mechanisms underlying these patient factors is important to improve treatment outcome. Analysis of genetic determinants of therapy response has great potential in this respect. However, therapy response is a complex phenotype. Thus, careful study of gene-gene and gene-environment interactions will be needed in order to turn this type of knowledge into benefit for the patient.

High sodium intake blunts the efficacy of angiotensin (Ang)-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition (ACEi), but the underlying mechanism is incompletely characterized. High sodium has been reported to increase vascular expression and vascular activity of ACE. To investigate whether high-dietary sodium-induced effects on vascular conversion of Ang I might be involved in the sodium-induced blunting of the response to ACEi, the authors studied the vasoconstrictor responses to Ang I and Ang II of isolated aortic rings from healthy rats on low dietary sodium (LS: 0.05% NaCl) and high dietary sodium (HS: 2.0% NaCl) after 3 weeks of ACEi (lisinopril 75 mg/L) or vehicle (CON). Blood pressure was similar in LS and HS in CON, but HS blunted the blood pressure response to ACEi. Functional conversion of Ang I was assessed as the difference in dose-response curves to Ang I and Ang II in parallel aortic rings. Sodium intake did not affect the dose-response curves to Ang I and Ang II in CON. In the ACEi groups, a significant difference was present between the curves for Ang I and Ang II on LS (DeltaEC(50), 6.7 nM, range, 2.2-13 nM-, P