1. Preferences of US adolescents and parents for vaccination against invasive meningococcal disease.
- Author
-
Schley K, Whichello C, Hauber B, Krucien N, Cappelleri JC, Peyrani P, Presa JV, Coulter J, and Heidenreich S
- Subjects
- Humans, Adolescent, Male, Female, Young Adult, Child, United States, Adult, Patient Preference, Meningococcal Vaccines immunology, Meningococcal Vaccines administration & dosage, Meningococcal Vaccines adverse effects, Meningococcal Infections prevention & control, Meningococcal Infections immunology, Parents psychology, Vaccination psychology, Vaccination methods
- Abstract
Background: Percentage uptake of some meningococcal vaccines is low in the US. Understanding what drives vaccination preferences may help to increase vaccination rates., Objectives: To determine how attributes of meningococcal vaccines and the availability of a pentavalent (MenABCWY) vaccine profile drive adolescents' and young people's (AYP's) willingness to be vaccinated and parents' and legal guardians' (PLG') willingness for their child to be vaccinated (WTV). To also explore how preferences for meningococcal vaccines vary by participant characteristics., Methods: Vaccine preferences were elicited in a discrete choice experiment (DCE) with AYP aged 16-23 years and PLG of adolescents aged 11-17 years. Participants chose between two hypothetical vaccine profiles that differed in level of protection, dosing, and risks of mild-to-moderate and severe side effects, and a no vaccination profile. Main outcome measures were relative attribute importance (RAI) and WTV. RAI measured the maximum contribution of an attribute to vaccination choice relative to other attributes. WTV compared predicted choice probabilities for the three vaccine profiles., Results: 407 AYP and 394 PLG participated (50.9% male, 78.4% White/Caucasian). Irrespective of vaccine attributes, 59.5% always opted into vaccination and 3.6% always opted out of vaccination. The most important attributes were level of protection (RAI: 33.7%) and risk of mild-to-moderate side effects (RAI: 32.3%). Dosing was more important to PLG (RAI: 5.9%) than AYP (RAI: 2.0%; p < .01). Adding a pentavalent vaccine alternative increased WTV by 3.7 percentage points (PP) for PLG, 2.4 PP for AYP, 16.4 PP for vaccine-hesitant participants, 13.4 PP for participants without health insurance, and 9.6 PP for adults., Conclusion: Level of protection and risk of mild-to-moderate side effects were the most important vaccine attributes. Adding a pentavalent vaccine alternative increased WTV particularly among adults, individuals who were vaccine-hesitant, and individuals without health insurance., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Katharina Schley reports a relationship with Pfizer Pharma GmbH that includes: employment. Brett Hauber reports a relationship with Pfizer Inc. that includes: employment. Joseph C. Cappelleri reports a relationship with Pfizer Inc. that includes: employment. Paula Peyrani reports a relationship with Pfizer Inc. that includes: employment. Jessica Vespa Presa reports a relationship with Pfizer Inc. that includes: employment. Joshua Coulter reports a relationship with Pfizer Inc. that includes: employment. Chiara Whichello reports a relationship with Evidera Ltd. that includes: employment. Nicolas Krucien reports a relationship with Evidera Ltd. that includes: employment. Sebastian Heidenreich reports a relationship with Evidera Ltd. that includes: employment. The following co-authors are employees of Pfizer and may hold stocks in Pfizer: KS, BH, JC, JCC, PP, and JVP. The following co-authors are employees of Evidera Ltd.: CW, SH, and NK. SH holds minor stocks in Thermo Fisher Scientific as part of his employment with Evidera. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF