Search

These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on recent updates to the 2015 NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck (H&N) Cancers. These Insights describe the different types of particle therapy that may be used to treat H&N cancers, in contrast to traditional radiation therapy (RT) with photons (x-ray). Research is ongoing regarding the different types of particle therapy, including protons and carbonions, with the goals of reducing the long-term side effects from RT and improving the therapeutic index. For the 2015 update, the NCCN H&N Cancers Panel agreed to delete recommendations for neutron therapy for salivary gland cancers, because of its limited availability, which has decreased over the past 2 decades; the small number of patients in the United States who currently receive this treatment; and concerns that the toxicity of neutron therapy may offset potential disease control advantages.

Biological models are used to relate the outcome of radiation therapy to dose distribution. As use of biological models in treatment planning expands, uncertainties associated with the use of specific models for predicting outcomes should be understood and quantified. In particular, the question to what extent model predictions are data-driven or dependent on the choice of the model has to be explored.Methods: Four dose-response models--logistic, log-logistic, Poisson-based and probit--were tested for their ability and consistency in describing dose-response data for radiation-induced optic neuropathy (RION) and retinopathy (RIRP). Dose to the optic nerves was specified as the minimum dose, Dmin, received by any segment of the organ to which the damage was diagnosed by ophthalmologic evaluation. For retinopathy, the dose to the retina was specified as the highest isodose covering at least 1/3 of the retinal surface (D33%) that geometrically covered the observed retinal damage. Data on both complications were modeled separately for patients treated once daily and twice daily. Model parameters D50and γ and corresponding confidence intervals were obtained using maximum-likelihood method.Results: Model parameters were reasonably consistent for RION data for patients treated once daily, D50ranging from 94.2 to 104.7 Gy and γ from 0.88 to 1.41. Similar consistency was seen for RIRP data which span a broad range of complication incidence, with D50from 72.2 to 75.0 Gy and γ from 1.51 to 2.16 for patients treated twice daily; 72.2-74.0 Gy and 0.84-1.20 for patients treated once daily. However, large variations were observed for RION in patients treated twice daily, D50from 96.3 to 125.2 Gy and γ from 0.80 to 1.56. Complication incidence in this dataset in any dose group did not exceed 20%.Conclusions: For the considered data sets, the log-logistic model tends to lead to larger D50and lower γ compared to other models for all datasets. Statements regarding normal tissue radiosensitivity and steepness of dose-response, based on model parameters, should be made with caution as the latter are not only model-dependent but also sensitive to the range of complication incidence exhibited by clinical data. © 2011 Moiseenko et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Focuses on a study which summarizes the results of the investigation which indicates that changing to an initial doses of inactivated poliovirus vaccine was not associated with decreases in vaccination coverage levels of routinely recommended vaccinations. Information on the participants of the study; Findings of the study; How the incidence of vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis was reduced.

Antibodies have attained a central role as targeted therapeutics, with several significant drugs on the market and many more in clinical development for oncological applications. Expansion of the role of antibodies in cancer imaging has been accelerated by a number of factors, including the recognition that antibodies can provide a powerful class of molecular imaging probes for interrogating cell surfaces in vivo. Identification of relevant cell surface biomarkers as imaging targets, coupled with advances in antibody technology, facilitate the generation of antibodies optimized for noninvasive imaging. Developments in imaging instrumentation and radionuclide availability have paved the way for broader evaluation and implementation of radioimmunoscintigraphy and immunoPET. Antibody imaging can provide a sensitive, noninvasive means for molecular characterization of cell surface phenotype in vivo, which can in turn guide diagnosis, prognosis, therapy selection, and monitoring of treatment in cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To test the hypothesis that radiation dose to (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET)-defined active bone marrow (BM(ACT)) subregions is correlated with hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. Methods and Materials: The conditions of 26 women with cervical cancer who underwent (18)F-FDG-PET before treatment with concurrent cisplatin and intensity-modulated radiation therapy were analyzed. BM(ACT) was defined as the subregion of total bone marrow (BM(TOT)) with a standardized uptake value (SUV) equal to or above the mean for that individual. Inactive bone marrow (BM(INACT)) was defined as BM(TOT) - BM(ACT). Generalized linear modeling was used to test the correlation between BM(ACT) and BM(INACT) dose-volume metrics and hematologic nadirs, particularly white blood cell count (WBC) and absolute neutrophil count (ANC). Results: Increased BM(ACT) mean dose was significantly associated with decreased log(WBC) nadir (β = -0.04; 95% CI, -0.07 to -0.01; p = 0.009), decreased log(ANC) nadir (β = -0.05; 95% CI, -0.08 to -0.02; p = 0.006), decreased hemoglobin nadir (β = -0.16; 95% CI, -0.27 to -0.05; p = 0.010), and decreased platelet nadir (β = -6.16; 95% CI, -9.37 to -2.96; p < 0.001). By contrast, there was no association between BM(INACT) mean dose and log(WBC) nadir (β = -0.01; 95% CI, -0.06 to 0.05; p = 0.84), log(ANC) nadir (β = -0.03; 95% CI, -0.10 to 0.04; p = 0.40), hemoglobin nadir (β = -0.09; 95% CI, -0.31 to 0.14; p = 0.452), or platelet nadir (β = -3.47; 95% CI, -10.44 to 3.50; p = 0.339). Conclusions: Irradiation of BM subregions with higher (18)F-FDG-PET activity was associated with hematologic toxicity, supporting the hypothesis that reducing dose to BM(ACT) subregions could mitigate hematologic toxicity. Future investigation should seek to confirm these findings and to identify optimal SUV thresholds to define BM(ACT). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Management of patients with locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) when cisplatin is contraindicated is controversial. We aimed to assess whether radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant durvalumab would improve outcomes compared with radiotherapy with cetuximab., Methods: NRG-HN004 was designed as an open-label, multicentre, parallel-group, randomised, phase 2/3 trial with safety lead-in conducted at 89 academic and community medical centres in North America. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition stage III-IVB p16-negative HNSCC or unfavourable stage I-III p16-positive oropharyngeal or unknown primary carcinoma, who had a contraindication to cisplatin (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] performance status 2, renal or hearing impairment, peripheral neuropathy, aged at least 70 years with moderate or severe comorbidity, or aged younger than 70 years with severe comorbidity). Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) by permuted block randomisation (multiples of 6) to intravenous durvalumab 1500 mg starting 2 weeks before radiotherapy then every 4 weeks starting week 2 of radiotherapy (seven cycles) or intravenous cetuximab 400 mg/m 2 1 week before radiotherapy then 250 mg/m 2 weekly beginning week 1 of radiotherapy (eight cycles), with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (70 Gy in 35 fractions over 7 weeks). Stratification factors were tumour and nodal stage, ECOG performance status and comorbidity, and primary site and p16 status. The phase 2 primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. There was one prespecified interim futility analysis at 50% of progression-free survival information. If the observed hazard ratio was 1·0 or more, favouring cetuximab, early stopping would be considered. Extended follow-up analysis was post hoc. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03258554, and is closed to enrolment., Findings: Following a ten-patient safety lead-in, the phase 2 trial enrolled 190 patients from March 12, 2019, to July 30, 2021, 186 of whom were randomly assigned (123 to durvalumab and 63 to cetuximab). Median age was 72 years (IQR 64-77), 30 (16%) patients were women and 156 (84%) were men. Phase 2 accrual was suspended in July 30, 2021, following an interim futility analysis, and permanently closed in Sept 1, 2022. The phase 3 part of the trial was not conducted. At a median follow-up of 2·3 years (IQR 1·9-3·1) for the extended follow-up (data cutoff July 31, 2023; post-hoc analysis), 2-year progression-free survival was 50·6% (95% CI 41·5-59·8) in the durvalumab group versus 63·7% (51·3-76·1) in the cetuximab group (hazard ratio 1·33 [95% CI 0·84-2·12]; p=0·89). Adverse events were similar in both groups. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were dysphagia (26 [22%] of 119 patients in the durvalumab group vs 18 [30%] of 61 patients in the cetuximab group), lymphopenia (33 [28%] vs 20 [33%]), and oral mucositis (13 [11%] vs 11 [18%]). Four (3%) patients in the durvalumab group and one (2%) in the cetuximab group died from treatment-related adverse events (death not otherwise specified, laryngeal oedema, lung infection, and respiratory failure in the durvalumab group and sudden death not otherwise specified in the cetuximab group)., Interpretation: Our findings suggest that durvalumab did not improve outcomes compared with cetuximab in patients with HNSCC with contraindications to cisplatin. Further trials are needed to define the standard of care for this population., Funding: US National Cancer Institute and AstraZeneca., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MJA declares grants or contracts from the National Institutes of Health (NIH; R21 for phase 1 trial DEHART), receipt of equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts, or other services from Genentech for drug only support for NIH R21. JEB declares clinical trial grants from Aveo, Celldex, CUE, Genentech, and Moderna, and consulting fees from Bluedot Bio and Exelixis. ND declares payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca. CH declares participation on a medical advisory board for EMD Serono, and a leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee, or advocacy group, paid or unpaid as co-chair of the Young Investigators Committee of the Head and Neck Cancer International Group. RCJ declares royalties or license from Elsevier for a textbook authorship. Q-TL declares a leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee, or advocacy group, paid or unpaid as Radiation Therapy Oncology group chair for NRG Oncology. LKM declares grants or contracts from AstraZeneca and Merck to their institution, consulting fees from Pfizer, and payment for expert testimony from Arnold & Porter. HSP declares grants or contracts from RefleXion and Merck to their institution, consulting fees from AstraZeneca and RefleXion, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Bristol Myers Squibb and G1 Therapeutics, and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board at AstraZeneca and Galera. SP declares grants or contracts from Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Actuate, Vyriad, Nanobiotix, Seattle Genetics, AstraZeneca, Molecular Templates, and Sorrento to their institution, consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb to their institution, and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Alkermes to their institution. CPR declares grants or contracts from AstraZeneca, Ayala, BMS, Cue Biopharma, Merck, Prelude, Sanofi Aventis, and Seagen to their institution, consulting fees from Vaccitech and Adaptimmune, and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board at Pionyr Therapeutics. AGS declares grants or contracts from Merck, Bicara, AstraZeneca, Genentech/Roche, ALX Oncology, Regeneron, and Infinity Pharmaceuticals to their institution, consulting fees from Bicara, and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers, bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from i3Health. VT declares grants or contracts from NIH and Veteran's Administration, support for attending meetings or travel from the American Society for Radiation Oncology and the American Board of Radiology, and receipt of equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts, or other services from Cardiff Oncology. PAT-S declares support for the current manuscript from NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center grant from NCI. TW-D declares grants or contracts from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Janssen, AstraZeneca/Medimmune, and Tesaro/GSK, and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board at Merck. SSY declares grants or contracts from Bristol Myers Squibb and EMD Serono to their institution, honoraria for editorship from Elsevier, and leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee, or advocacy group, paid or unpaid at ASTRO for editorship. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Randomized trials have found that patients with locoregionally advanced p16+ oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) do not benefit from treatment deintensification, even among favorable risk groups. Although various methods have been used to identify candidates for treatment deintensification, the optimal approach is unknown., Methods and Materials: We conducted a multi-institutional cohort study of 444 patients with previously untreated p16+ OPSCC undergoing definitive radiation therapy with or without systemic therapy between 2009 and 2022. We compared the following 2 approaches for identifying candidates for deintensification: (1) favorable versus unfavorable risk, using NRG-HN005 eligibility criteria, and (2) low versus high relative risk of cancer events, using the Head and Neck Cancer Intergroup predictive classifier ("omega score"). We tested differences in outcomes and systemic therapy allocation by risk group using multivariable Cox models, competing event models, and logistic regression, and compared characteristics of hypothetical deintensification trials using the 2 approaches. Progression-free survival events were defined as cancer recurrence (locoregional or distant) or death from any cause., Results: Median follow-up time was 52 months; 120 patients (27.0%) were favorable risk; a different 120 patients had low omega score; 28 patients (6.3%) met both criteria; 184 patients (41.4%) had discordant classification. On ordinal logistic regression, decreasing omega score was associated with a statistically significantly lower odds of receiving intensive therapy (normalized odds ratio, 0.37 per SD; 95% CI, 0.24-0.57), with a greater magnitude than favorable risk group (odds ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44-0.99). Among patients receiving cisplatin and/or platinum-based induction (n = 374), favorable risk was associated with significantly improved progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.99), whereas lower omega score was associated with a significantly decreased relative hazard for cancer events (relative hazard ratio, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.070-0.46). In simulations, selecting patients with low omega scores increased the efficiency of hypothetical noninferiority trials., Conclusions: Considering patients' relative risk of cancer events can help define optimal populations for treatment deintensification in p16+ OPSCC., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Adenoid cystic carcinoma is a malignancy that is difficult to treat and often metastasizes to the lung. Systemic chemotherapies are not effective for this tumor type, thus local therapies are frequently used. Here, we report a case demonstrating the use of extensive ablative interventions in controlling the progression of metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma. A patient with adenoid cystic carcinoma developed numerous metastases to his lungs and liver. Local ablative therapies including interstitial brachytherapy and SBRT were used to treat approximately 80 different metastases over the course of a decade. Over 850 brachytherapy seeds were implanted in this patient, and the tumor control and patient outcome were good. As of the most recent follow-up in March 2024, the patient has survived for approximately 12 years since his diagnosis of adenoid cystic carcinoma. To our knowledge, this case represents the most brachytherapy treatments reported in a single patient. It highlights the utility of interstitial brachytherapy and SBRT in treating extensive lung and liver metastases.

Objectives: A subset of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) patients undergoing larynx preserving treatment ultimately require total laryngectomy (TL) for oncologic or functional reasons. This study aims to identify TL risk factors in these patients., Methods: Retrospective cohort study using Veterans Affairs (VA) database. T1-T4 LSCC cases treated with primary radiotherapy (XRT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) were assessed for TL and recurrence. Binary logistic and Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were implemented., Results: Of 5390 cases, 863 (16.0%) underwent TL. On multivariable analysis, age (adjusted odds ratio: 0.97 [0.96-0.98]; p  < .001) and N3 disease (0.42 [0.18-1.00]; p  = .050) were associated with reduced risk of TL, whereas current alcohol use (1.22 [1.04-1.43]; p  = .015) and >T1 disease (T2, 1.76 [1.44-2.17]; p  < .001; T3, 2.06 [1.58-2.68]; p  < .001; T4, 1.79 [1.26-2.53]; p  = .001) were associated with increased risk of TL. However, N2 (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.30 [1.10-1.55]; p  = .003) and N3 (2.02 [1.25-3.26]; p  = .004) disease were associated with an increased risk for local recurrence. Compared to XRT, treatment with CRT was associated with reduced risk for local recurrence after adjusting for other factors (0.84 [0.70-0.99]; p  = .044). Those who do not receive TL following local recurrence have poorer disease-specific survival (log-rank, p  < .001). In patients without local recurrence, N2 disease was associated with a fourfold increase in risk of TL (4.24 [1.83-9.82]; p  < .001)., Conclusion: Advanced nodal stage was associated with reduced rates of salvage TL in the setting of local recurrence, and subsequent worse prognosis after recurrence. Conversely, advanced nodal stage may increase the risk for functional salvage TL in patients without recurrence., Level of Evidence: Level 3., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (© 2024 The Author(s). Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Triological Society.)

Background: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer. We investigated how additional bone marrow sparing (BMS) affects the clinical outcomes., Methods: We queried MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Google Scholar, Sinomed, CNKI, and Wanfang databases for articles published in English or Chinese between 2010/01/01 and 2023/10/31. Full-text manuscripts of prospective, randomised trials on BMS in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive or postoperative CRT were included. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using Cochrane Collaboration's RoB tool. Random-effects models were used for the meta -analysis., Results: A total of 17 trials encompassing 1297 patients were included. The majority were single-centre trials (n = 1268) performed in China (n = 1128). Most trials used CT-based anatomical BMS (n = 1076). There was a comparable representation of trials in the definitive (n = 655) and postoperative (n = 582) settings, and the remaining trials included both.Twelve studies reported data on G ≥ 3 (n = 782) and G ≥ 2 (n = 754) haematologic adverse events. Both G ≥ 3 (OR 0.39; 95 % CI 0.28-0.55; p < 0.001) and G ≥ 2 (OR 0.29; 95 % CI 0.18-0.46; p < 0.001) toxicity were significantly lowered, favouring BMS. Seven studies (n = 635) reported data on chemotherapy interruptions, defined as receiving less than five cycles of cisplatin, which were significantly less frequent in patients treated with BMS (OR 0.44; 95 % CI 0.24-0.81; p = 0.016). There was no evidence of increased gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity.There were no signs of significant heterogeneity. Four studies were assessed as high RoB; sensitivity analyses excluding these provided comparable results for main outcomes. The main limitations include heterogeneity in BMS methodology between studies, low representation of populations most affected by cervical cancer, and insufficient data to assess survival outcomes., Conclusions: The addition of BMS to definitive CRT in cervical cancer patients decreases hematologic toxicity and the frequency of interruptions in concurrent chemotherapy. However, data are insufficient to verify the impact on survival and disease control., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Background: Previous studies indicate that the benefit of short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer depends on competing risks., Objective: To determine whether a quantitative method to stratify patients by risk for competing events (omega score) could identify subgroups that selectively benefit from ADT., Design, Setting, and Participants: An ancillary analysis of NRG/RTOG 9408 phase 3 trial (NCT00002597) involving 1945 prostate cancer patients was conducted., Intervention: Short-term ADT., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: We applied generalised competing event regression models incorporating age, performance status, comorbidity, T category, Gleason score (GS), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA), to stratify patients according to relative hazards for primary cancer-related events (distant metastasis or prostate cancer death) versus competing noncancer mortality. We tested interactions between ADT and subgroups defined by standard risk criteria versus relative risk (RR) using the omega score., Results and Limitations: T2b, higher GS, and higher PSA were associated with an increased RR for cancer-related versus competing mortality events (a higher omega score); increased age and comorbidity were associated with a decreased omega score. Of 996 patients with low-risk/favourable intermediate-risk (FIR) disease, 286 (28.7%) had a high omega score (≥0.314). Of 768 patients with unfavourable intermediate-risk disease, 175 (22.8%) had a low omega score. The overall discordance in risk classification was 26.1%. Both standard criteria and omega score identified significant interactions for the effect of ADT on cancer-related events and late mortality in low- versus high-risk subgroups. Within the low-risk/FIR subgroup, a higher omega score identified patients in whom ADT significantly reduced cancer events and improved event-free survival. Limitations are the need for external/prospective validation and lower RT doses than contemporary standards., Conclusions: Stratification based on competing event risk is useful for identifying prostate cancer patients who selectively benefit from ADT., Patient Summary: We analysed the effectiveness of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for localised prostate cancer among patients, defined by the relative risk (RR) for cancer versus noncancer events. Among patients with traditional low-risk/favourable intermediate-risk disease, those with a higher RR benefitted from short-term ADT., (Copyright © 2023 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: In select patients, pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains a local disease, yet there are no validated biomarkers to predict this behavior and who may benefit from aggressive local treatments. This study sought to determine if SMAD4 (mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 4) messenger RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) expression is a robust method for predicting overall survival (OS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma., Methods: Utilizing The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC), 322 patients with resected stage I-III pancreatic adenocarcinoma were identified. In TCGA, multivariable proportional hazards models were used to determine the association of SMAD4 genomic aberrations and RNA-seq expression with OS and DMFS. In the ICGC, analysis sought to confirm the predictive performance of RNA-seq via multivariable models and receiver operator characteristic curves., Results: In TCGA, the presence of SMAD4 genomic aberrations was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.55; 95% CI, 1.00-2.40; p = .048) but not DMFS (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, .87-2.03; p = .19). Low SMAD4 RNA-seq expression was associated with worse OS (HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.17-2.86; p = .008) and DMFS (HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.14-2.54; p = .009). In the ICGC, increased SMAD4 RNA-seq expression correlated with improved OS (area under the curve [AUC], .92; 95% CI, .86-.94) and DMFS (AUC, .84; 95% CI, .82-.87)., Conclusions: In patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma, SMAD4 genomic aberrations are associated with worse OS but do not predict for DMFS. Increased SMAD4 RNA-seq expression is associated with improved OS and DMFS in patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This reproducible finding suggests SMAD4 RNA-seq expression may be a useful marker to predict metastatic spread., (© 2023 American Cancer Society.)

There are over 220 identified genotypes of Human papillomavirus (HPV), and the HPV genome encodes 3 major oncogenes, E5, E6, and E7. Conservation and divergence in protein sequence and function between low-risk versus high-risk oncogenic HPV genotypes has not been fully characterized. Here, we used modern computational and structural folding algorithms to perform a comparative analysis of HPV E5, E6, and E7 between multiple low risk and high risk genotypes. We first identified significantly greater sequence divergence in E5 between low- and high-risk genotypes compared to E6 and E7. Next, we used AlphaFold to model the structure of papillomavirus proteins and complexes with high confidence, including some with no established consensus structure. We observed that HPV E5, but not E6 or E7, had a dramatically different 3D structure between low-risk and high-risk genotypes. To our knowledge, this is the first comparative analysis of HPV proteins using Alphafold artificial intelligence (AI) system. The marked differences in E5 sequence and structure in high-risk HPVs may contribute in important and underappreciated ways to the development of HPV-associated cancers., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: This research was supported by discretionary and startup funds. A.B. Sharabi reports being a paid consultant/advisory board member for AstraZeneca, Primmune, Merck, and Jounce Therapeutics; reports receiving commercial research grants from Varian Medical Systems and Pfizer; reports being the scientific founder and has an equity interest in Toragen Inc. The terms of this arrangement have been reviewed and approved by the University of California, San Diego in accordance with its conflict-of-interest policies. A. Venuti is a scientific advisory board member for Toragen Inc. J.S. Mayadev reports consulting for Varian Medical Systems, Merck, Primmune, and AstraZeneca., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose/objectives: We sought to create nomograms to predict individual risk of early mortality, which can identify patients who require interventions to prevent early death., Methods: We included patients in the National Cancer Database with non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck who received radiation and systemic therapy between 2004 and 2017 in the definitive or adjuvant setting. Early mortality was defined as any death less than 90 days after starting radiation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between covariates and early mortality. Nomograms to predict the risk of early death were created for both the definitive and adjuvant settings., Results: Among 84,563 patients in the definitive group and 18,514 patients in the adjuvant group, rates of early mortality were 3.5 % (95 % CI 3.4-3.7 %) and 2.2 %, (95 % CI 1.9-2.4 %), respectively. Patients above the age of 70 had an early mortality rate of 7.8 % (95 % CI 7.3-8.2 %) in the definitive group and 4.4 % (95 % CI 3.6-5.4 %) in the adjuvant group. In the multivariable analysis, age, comorbidity, T and N category, and tumor site were associated with early mortality in both cohorts (p < 0.05 for all). Nomograms including age, comorbidity, T and N category and tumor site performed better than age alone at predicting early mortality (AUC for definitive group: 0.70 vs 0.66; AUC for adjuvant group: 0.71 vs 0.61)., Conclusion: Nomograms including age, comorbidity, T and N category and tumor site were developed to predict the risk of early death following definitive or adjuvant chemoradiation., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a cutaneous malignancy often treated with surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiation therapy (RT). In the node-positive setting, adjuvant RT reduces the risk of locoregional recurrence, but historical data suggest that distant failure is a persistent issue and often fatal. This has prompted new efforts to intensify treatment in these patients with the addition of neoadjuvant or adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. However, newer diagnostic techniques have led to stage migration in patients with previously subclinical metastatic disease; consequently, preventing locoregional recurrence may be a higher priority in node-positive MCC patients than was previously believed. Recent trials in node-positive MCC, such as ADMEC-O, have had lower rates of adjuvant RT utilization in treatment versus control arms, which may have attenuated the observed effect of adjuvant immunotherapy. The low utilization of adjuvant RT may have also resulted in a higher recurrence rate in patients who did not have a complete response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in the CHECKMATE 358 trial. Altogether, these are important considerations for ongoing and future immunotherapy trials in MCC and may affect the interpretation of their results. Ongoing clinical trials may determine which patients are at low risk of recurrence when treated with immunotherapy and whether adjuvant RT could be omitted in select patients.

Importance: Patients with locally advanced non-human papillomavirus (HPV) head and neck cancer (HNC) carry an unfavorable prognosis. Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with cisplatin or anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody improves overall survival (OS) of patients with stage III to IV HNC, and preclinical data suggest that a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor dual EGFR and ERBB2 (formerly HER2 or HER2/neu) inhibitor may be more effective than anti-EGFR antibody therapy in HNC., Objective: To examine whether adding lapatinib, a dual EGFR and HER2 inhibitor, to radiation plus cisplatin for frontline therapy of stage III to IV non-HPV HNC improves progression-free survival (PFS)., Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial enrolled 142 patients with stage III to IV carcinoma of the oropharynx (p16 negative), larynx, and hypopharynx with a Zubrod performance status of 0 to 1 who met predefined blood chemistry criteria from October 18, 2012, to April 18, 2017 (median follow-up, 4.1 years). Data analysis was performed from December 1, 2020, to December 4, 2020., Intervention: Patients were randomized (1:1) to 70 Gy (6 weeks) plus 2 cycles of cisplatin (every 3 weeks) plus either 1500 mg per day of lapatinib (CRT plus lapatinib) or placebo (CRT plus placebo)., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was PFS, with 69 events required. Progression-free survival rates between arms for all randomized patients were compared by 1-sided log-rank test. Secondary end points included OS., Results: Of the 142 patients enrolled, 127 (median [IQR] age, 58 [53-63] years; 98 [77.2%] male) were randomized; 63 to CRT plus lapatinib and 64 to CRT plus placebo. Final analysis did not suggest improvement in PFS (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.56-1.46; P = .34) or OS (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.61-1.86; P = .58) with the addition of lapatinib. There were no significant differences in grade 3 to 4 acute adverse event rates (83.3% [95% CI, 73.9%-92.8%] with CRT plus lapatinib vs 79.7% [95% CI, 69.4%-89.9%] with CRT plus placebo; P = .64) or late adverse event rates (44.4% [95% CI, 30.2%-57.8%] with CRT plus lapatinib vs 40.8% [95% CI, 27.1%-54.6%] with CRT plus placebo; P = .84)., Conclusion and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, dual EGFR-ERBB2 inhibition with lapatinib did not appear to enhance the benefit of CRT. Although the results of this trial indicate that accrual to a non-HPV HNC-specific trial is feasible, new strategies must be investigated to improve the outcome for this population with a poor prognosis., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01711658.

Purpose: To develop and test a method for fully automated segmentation of bony structures from whole-body computed tomography (CT) and evaluate its performance compared with manual segmentation., Methods and Materials: We developed a workflow for automatic whole-body bone segmentation using atlas-based segmentation (ABS) method with a postprocessing module (ABS PP ) in MIM MAESTRO software. Fifty-two CT scans comprised the training set to build the atlas library, and 29 CT scans comprised the test set. To validate the workflow, we compared Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean distance to agreement, and relative volume errors between ABS PP and ABS with no postprocessing (ABS NPP ) with manual segmentation as the reference (gold standard)., Results: The ABS PP method resulted in significantly improved segmentation accuracy (DSC range, 0.85-0.98) compared with the ABS NPP method (DSC range, 0.55-0.87; P < .001). Mean distance to agreement results also indicated high agreement between ABS PP and manual reference delineations (range, 0.11-1.56 mm), which was significantly improved compared with ABS NPP (range, 1.00-2.34 mm) for the majority of tested bony structures. Relative volume errors were also significantly lower for ABS PP compared with ABS NPP for most bony structures., Conclusions: We developed a fully automated MIM workflow for bony structure segmentation from whole-body CT, which exhibited high accuracy compared with manual delineation. The integrated postprocessing module significantly improved workflow performance., (Copyright © 2023 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Spine metastasis can be treated with high-dose radiation therapy with advanced delivery technology for long-term tumor and pain control., Objective: To assess whether patient-reported pain relief was improved with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as compared with conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT) for patients with 1 to 3 sites of vertebral metastases., Design, Setting, and Participants: In this randomized clinical trial, patients with 1 to 3 vertebral metastases were randomized 2:1 to the SRS or cEBRT groups. This NRG 0631 phase 3 study was performed as multi-institutional enrollment within NRG Oncology. Eligibility criteria included the following: (1) solitary vertebral metastasis, (2) 2 contiguous vertebral levels involved, or (3) maximum of 3 separate sites. Each site may involve up to 2 contiguous vertebral bodies. A total of 353 patients enrolled in the trial, and 339 patients were analyzed. This analysis includes data extracted on March 9, 2020., Interventions: Patients randomized to the SRS group were treated with a single dose of 16 or 18 Gy (to convert to rad, multiply by 100) given to the involved vertebral level(s) only, not including any additional spine levels. Patients assigned to cEBRT were treated with 8 Gy given to the involved vertebra plus 1 additional vertebra above and below., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was patient-reported pain response defined as at least a 3-point improvement on the Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRPS) without worsening in pain at the secondary site(s) or the use of pain medication. Secondary end points included treatment-related toxic effects, quality of life, and long-term effects on vertebral bone and spinal cord., Results: A total of 339 patients (mean [SD] age of SRS group vs cEBRT group, respectively, 61.9 [13.1] years vs 63.7 [11.9] years; 114 [54.5%] male in SRS group vs 70 [53.8%] male in cEBRT group) were analyzed. The baseline mean (SD) pain score at the index vertebra was 6.06 (2.61) in the SRS group and 5.88 (2.41) in the cEBRT group. The primary end point of pain response at 3 months favored cEBRT (41.3% for SRS vs 60.5% for cEBRT; difference, -19 percentage points; 95% CI, -32.9 to -5.5; 1-sided P = .99; 2-sided P = .01). Zubrod score (a measure of performance status ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 being fully functional and asymptomatic, and 4 being bedridden) was the significant factor influencing pain response. There were no differences in the proportion of acute or late adverse effects. Vertebral compression fracture at 24 months was 19.5% with SRS and 21.6% with cEBRT (P = .59). There were no spinal cord complications reported at 24 months., Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, superiority of SRS for the primary end point of patient-reported pain response at 3 months was not found, and there were no spinal cord complications at 2 years after SRS. This finding may inform further investigation of using spine radiosurgery in the setting of oligometastases, where durability of cancer control is essential., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00922974.

Purpose: To estimate local control, survival, and toxicity associated with a 3-fraction (3F) image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) regimen compared to longer fraction (LF) for cervical cancer., Methods: 150 patients treated between 2015-2020 with 3F (24Gy in 3 fractions) or LF (28...30 Gy in 4-5 fractions) were reviewed. The primary outcome was 2-year local failure. We compared overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), hospitalizations, and toxicity., Results: There were 32 patients in the 3F group and 118 in the LF group, with a median follow up of 22 months. The 3F had worse performance status (p = 0.01) but otherwise similar characteristics. The 2-year local failure rate was 3.6% (95% CI 0%, 10.6%) for 3F, and 7.5% (95% CI 2.4%, 12.6%) for LF. The univariable hazard ratio (HR) for local failure for 3F was 0.43 (0.05, 3.43; p = 0.43). Moreover, 2 of 32 (6.3%) 3F patients experienced Grade ...3 toxicity compared to 7 of 118 (5.9%) LF patients (p = 1.0), with no difference in hospitalization within 2 years (p = 0.66) and no treatment-related deaths., Conclusions: Local control was excellent, with long term survival and toxicity similar between the groups. These findings support consideration of 3F., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: Programmed death-1 immune checkpoint blockade improves survival of patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), but the benefits of addition to (chemo)radiation for newly diagnosed patients with HNSCC remain unknown., Methods and Materials: We evaluated the safety of nivolumab concomitant with 70 Gy intensity modulated radiation therapy and weekly cisplatin (arm 1), every 3-week cisplatin (arm 2), cetuximab (arm 3), or alone for platinum-ineligible patients (arm 4) in newly diagnosed intermediate- or high-risk locoregionally advanced HNSCC. Patients received nivolumab from 2 weeks prior to radiation therapy until 3 months post-radiation therapy. The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). If ≤2 of the first 8 evaluable patients experienced a DLT, an arm was considered safe. Secondary endpoints included toxicity and feasibility of adjuvant nivolumab to 1 year, defined as all 7 additional doses received by ≥4 of the first 8 evaluable patients across arms., Results: Of 39 patients (10 in arms 1, 3, 4 and 9 in arm 2), 72% had T3-4 tumors, 85% had N2-3 nodal disease, and 67% had >10 pack-years of smoking. There were no DLTs in arms 1 and 2, 1 in arm 3 (mucositis), and 2 in arm 4 (lipase elevation and mucositis in 1 and fatigue in another). The most common grade ≥3 nivolumab-related adverse events were lipase increase, mucositis, diarrhea, lymphopenia, hyponatremia, leukopenia, fatigue, and serum amylase increase. Adjuvant nivolumab was feasible as defined in the protocol., Conclusions: Concomitant nivolumab with the 4 tested regimens was safe for patients with intermediate- and high-risk HNSCC, and subsequent adjuvant nivolumab was feasible as defined (NCT02764593)., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Opinion Statement: Significant advancements have been made in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer, predominantly driven by the integration of concurrent chemotherapy with radiation therapy as a standard of care for many patients. The most heavily investigated chemotherapeutic is cisplatin, yet many patients are ineligible for cisplatin due to the presence of pre-existing medical comorbidities. Moreover, given the toxicity profile of cisplatin, identifying which patients stand to benefit from cisplatin is challenging, which is particularly evident in older patients. Efforts to better risk-stratify patients based on age, performance status, and the degree of pre-existing comorbidities are ongoing and have been increasingly utilized in national clinical trials. In parallel, exploration into alternative systemic agents, including novel targeted therapies and immunotherapies, in cisplatin-ineligible patients are rapidly expanding. Cumulatively, identifying appropriate treatment paradigms in patients who harbor contraindications to cisplatin can not only improve clinical outcomes but also critically mitigate detrimental adverse effects., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To provide evidence-based recommendations for practicing physicians and other health care providers on immunotherapy and biomarker testing for head and neck cancers., Methods: ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, surgical oncology, radiation oncology, radiology, pathology, and patient advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, including systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 2000 through 2022. Outcomes of interest included survival, overall response, and locoregional control. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations., Results: The literature search identified 28 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline., Recommendations: When possible, evidence-based recommendations were developed to address biomarker testing, first-line treatment regimens based on programmed death ligand-1 scores, immunotherapy in platinum-refractory recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, immunotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and radiation therapy in combination with immunotherapy for treatment of local recurrence.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines.

Objective: To determine characteristics most strongly associated with risk for aspiration events among head and neck cancer (HNC) patients undergoing curative intent treatment., Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study of 106 patients with previously untreated HNC who received definitive or postoperative radiation therapy (RT) +/- systemic therapy with curative intent. Patients who received post-treatment videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) between 2018-2021 were included. Using ordinal multivariable logistic regression, we modeled the effects of age (>60 years vs. ≤60 years), sex, body mass index (BMI) (>20 kg/m 2 vs. ≤20 kg/m 2 ), American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition stage (I-II vs. III-IVB), treatment with cisplatin (vs. other or no systemic therapy), post-operative status, primary site (oral cavity vs. P16+ oropharynx vs. P16- Mucosal Site vs. other), and quantitative VFSS measures on Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) score., Results and Conclusion: On ordinal multivariable logistic regression, age >60 years (odds ratio (OR): 3.91, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.29, 11.9), advanced stage (stage III-IVB) (OR: 3.13, 95% CI: 1.23, 7.79), pharyngeal constriction ratio (PCR) >0.25 (OR: 3.65, 95% CI: 1.14, 11.7), and bolus clearance ratio (BCR) > 0.10 (OR: 3.42, 95% CI: 1.20, 9.75) were found to be significant risk factors for higher PAS scores. Patients with ≥ 2 pre-treatment risk factors had statistically significant increased risk for post-treatment aspiration (OR 2.52, 95% CI: 1.31, 4.86) on ordinal logistic regression. This model could be useful to direct high-risk patients toward interventions designed to reduce risk of aspiration events., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To identify factors associated with receipt of incomplete cisplatin during chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer and its impact on outcomes., Methods: Patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemoradiation at our institution between November 2015 and August 2020 were retrospectively identified. Patients who received ≤4 cycles were identified as the 'incomplete' cohort and those who received 5-6 cycles as the 'complete' cohort. The primary endpoint of incomplete chemotherapy was evaluated with multivariable logistic regression. Secondary endpoints of locoregional failure, overall survival, and distant failure were evaluated in multivariable Cox and Fine-Gray models., Results: Of 140 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer that underwent chemoradiation, 22 (15.7%) received an incomplete cisplatin regimen (8 with 0 cycles, 14 with 1-4 cycles). The most common reasons for receiving incomplete treatment were comorbidities/infections (41%), unmet laboratory parameters (27%), and cisplatin intolerance (14%). In multivariable models, only poor (2-4) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was a significant predictor as these patients were 41 times more likely to receive incomplete chemotherapy (odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.57 to 375.15, p<0.001). Median follow-up time was 20 months (range 4-64). In multivariable models, receipt of incomplete cisplatin was significantly associated with higher recurrence (locoregional failure hazard ratio (HR) 3.02, 95% CI 1.08 to 8.45, p=0.03; distant failure HR 2.71, 95% CI 1.13 to 6.47, p=0.02) and worse survival (overall survival HR 4.91, 95% CI 1.27 to 18.98, p=0.02)., Conclusion: Incomplete cisplatin regimen was associated with worse oncologic outcomes. Poor performance status was the only factor associated with receiving an incomplete regimen. This notable proportion of patients may be a target for better tolerated novel targeted anticancer agents in order to improve outcomes., Competing Interests: Competing interests: LKM reports research grants from Merck; consultant fees from Bayer HealthCare; and other fees from Merck and ER Squibb & Sons outside the submitted work. JM serves as a consultant for Astra Zeneca, NRG Oncology, GOG Foundation, Varian Medical Systems, Primmune, and Merck; co-chair for NRG Oncology Cervix Co-Chair; and board member for GOG Foundation outside the submitted work., (© IGCS and ESGO 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma (HPV-OPC) is increasingly treated with primary surgery. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommends adjuvant therapy for surgically treated HPV-OPC displaying adverse pathological features (AF). We evaluated adjuvant radiotherapy patterns and outcomes in surgically treated AF-positive HPV-OPC (AF-HPV-OPC). Methods: The National Cancer Database was interrogated for patients ≥ 18 years with early-stage HPV-OPC from 2010 to 2017 who underwent definitive resection. Patients that had an NCCN-defined AF indication for adjuvant radiotherapy were assessed, including positive surgical margins (PSM), extranodal extension (ENE), lymphovascular invasion, and level 4/5 cervical lymph nodes. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan−Meier analysis in whole and propensity score matched (PM) cohorts. Results: Of 15,036 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 55.7% were positive for at least one AF. Presence of any AF was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.56, p < 0.001). In isolation, each AF was associated with worse OS. On PM analysis, insurance status, T2 category, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score, ENE (HR = 1.81, p < 0.001), and PSM (HR = 1.58, p = 0.002) were associated with worse OS. Median 3-year OS was 92.0% among AF-HPV-OPC patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy and 84.2% for those who did not receive adjuvant radiotherapy (p < 0.001, n = 1678). The overall rate of patients with AF-HPV-OPC who did not receive adjuvant radiotherapy was 13% and increased from 10% in 2010 to 17% in 2017 (ptrend = 0.007). Conclusions: In patients with AF-HPV-OPC, adjuvant radiotherapy is associated with improved survival. In the era of de-escalation therapy for HPV-OPC, our findings demonstrate the persistent prognostic benefit of post-operative radiotherapy in the setting of commonly identified adverse features. Ongoing clinical trials will better elucidate optimized patient selection for de-escalated therapy.

Objective: Recurrence is known to predict laryngeal squamous cell cancer (LSCC) survival. Recurrence patterns in T4a LSCC are poorly characterized and represent a possible explanation for observed survival discrepancies by treatment rendered., Study Design: Retrospective database review., Setting: Veterans Affairs national database., Methods: Patients with T4a LSCC between 2000 and 2017 were identified and stratified by treatment (chemoradiotherapy [CRT] vs total laryngectomy + neck dissection + adjuvant therapy [surgical]). Primary outcomes were locoregional and distant recurrence. Secondary outcomes of overall mortality, larynx cancer mortality, and noncancer mortality were evaluated in Cox and Fine-Gray models., Results: A total of 1043 patients had comparable baseline demographics: 438 in the CRT group and 605 in the surgical group. Patients undergoing CRT had higher proportions of node positivity (64.6% vs 53.1%, P < .001). Locoregional and distant recurrence were less common in the surgical group (23.0% vs 37.2%, P < .001; 6.8% vs 13.3%, P < .001, respectively); however, distant metastatic rates did not differ within the N0 subgroup ( P = .722). On multivariable regression, surgery demonstrated favorable locoregional recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% CI, 0.39-0.62; P < .001), distant recurrence (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.31-0.71; P < .001), overall mortality (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.64-0.87; P < .001), and larynx cancer mortality (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56-0.85; P < .001)., Conclusion: T4a LSCC survival discrepancies between surgical and nonsurgical treatment are influenced by varying recurrence behaviors. Surgery was associated with superior disease control and improved survival. Beyond the known benefit in locoregional control with surgery, there may be a protective effect on distant recurrence that depends on regional disease burden.

Radiomics has been applied to predict recurrence in several disease sites, but current approaches are typically restricted to analyzing tumor features, neglecting nontumor information in the rest of the body. The purpose of this work was to develop and validate a model incorporating nontumor radiomics, including whole-body features, to predict treatment outcomes in patients with previously untreated locoregionally advanced cervical cancer. Methods: We analyzed 127 cervical cancer patients treated definitively with chemoradiotherapy and intracavitary brachytherapy. All patients underwent pretreatment whole-body 18 F-FDG PET/CT. To quantify effects due to the tumor itself, the gross tumor volume (GTV) was directly contoured on the PET/CT image. Meanwhile, to quantify effects arising from the rest of the body, the planning target volume (PTV) was deformably registered from each planning CT to the PET/CT scan, and a semiautomated approach combining seed-growing and manual contour review generated whole-body muscle, bone, and fat segmentations on each PET/CT image. A total of 965 radiomic features were extracted for GTV, PTV, muscle, bone, and fat. Ninety-five patients were used to train a Cox model of disease recurrence including both radiomic and clinical features (age, stage, tumor grade, histology, and baseline complete blood cell counts), using bagging and split-sample-validation for feature reduction and model selection. To further avoid overfitting, the resulting models were tested for generalization on the remaining 32 patients, by calculating a risk score based on Cox regression and evaluating the c-index (c-index > 0.5 indicates predictive power). Results: Optimal performance was seen in a Cox model including 1 clinical biomarker (whether or not a tumor was stage III-IVA), 2 GTV radiomic biomarkers (PET gray-level size-zone matrix small area low gray level emphasis and zone entropy), 1 PTV radiomic biomarker (major axis length), and 1 whole-body radiomic biomarker (CT bone root mean square). In particular, stratification into high- and low-risk groups, based on the linear risk score from this Cox model, resulted in a hazard ratio of 0.019 (95% CI, 0.004, 0.082), an improvement over stratification based on clinical stage alone, which had a hazard ratio of 0.36 (95% CI, 0.16, 0.83). Conclusion: Incorporating nontumor radiomic biomarkers can improve the performance of prognostic models compared with using only clinical and tumor radiomic biomarkers. Future work should look to further test these models in larger, multiinstitutional cohorts., (© 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

Background: To test whether nomograms developed by NRG Oncology for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients could be validated in an independent population-based sample., Methods: The authors tested nomograms for estimating progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients from the Veterans Health Administration with previously untreated locoregionally advanced OPSCC, diagnosed between 2008 and 2017, managed with definitive radiotherapy with or without adjuvant systemic therapy. Covariates were age, performance status, p16 status, T/N category, smoking history, education history, weight loss, marital status, and anemia. We used multiple imputation to handle missing data and performed sensitivity analyses on complete cases. Validation was assessed via Cox proportional hazards models, log-rank tests, and c-indexes., Results: A total of 4007 patients met inclusion criteria (658 patients had complete data). Median follow-up time was 3.20 years, with 967 progression events and 471 noncancer deaths. Each risk score was associated with poorer outcomes per unit increase (PFS score, hazard ratio [HR], 1.42 [1.37-1.47]; OS score, HR, 1.40 [1.34-1.45]). By risk score quartile, 2-year PFS estimates were 89.2%, 78.5%, 65.8%, and 48.3%; OS estimates were 92.6%, 83.6%, 73.9%, and 51.3%, respectively (P < .01 for all comparisons). C-indices for models of PFS and OS were 0.65 and 0.67, for all patients, respectively (0.69 and 0.73 for complete cases). The nomograms slightly overestimated PFS and OS in the overall cohort but exhibited high agreement in complete cases., Conclusions: NRG nomograms were effective for predicting PFS and OS for patients with OPSCC, supporting their broader applicability in the OPSCC population undergoing definitive radiotherapy., (© 2022 American Cancer Society.)

Background: Chemoradiation or radiation therapy alone are curative standards for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer., Objective: To investigate factors that influence time to initiation of chemoradiation or radiation and the subsequent impact of time to treatment on recurrence and survival outcomes., Methods: Patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation or radiation at our institution between November 2015 and August 2020 were retrospectively identified. Time to treatment initiation was defined as the number of days from date of diagnosis (via biopsy) to the start date of radiation. The cohort was stratified by the median time to treatment into early (<75 days) and delayed (≥75 days) cohorts. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to examine factors associated with delayed time to treatment., Results: We identified 143 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer who underwent definitive chemoradiation or radiation. Median follow-up time was 18 months (range 2-62). A total of 71 (49.7%) patients had time to treatment <75 days and 72 (50.3%) patients had time to treatment ≥75 days. The delayed cohort had a higher proportion of Hispanic patients (51.4% vs 31.0%, p=0.04). In multivariable modeling, Hispanic women were 2.71 times more likely (p=0.04) to undergo delayed time to treatment than non-Hispanic white women. Additionally, patients with stage >IIB disease were less likely to undergo delayed time to treatment (OR 0.26, p=0.02) than patients with stage

Purpose: Cancer treatments can paradoxically appear to reduce the risk of noncancer mortality in observational studies, due to residual confounding. Here we introduce a method, Bias Reduction through Analysis of Competing Events (BRACE), to reduce bias in the presence of residual confounding., Experimental Design: BRACE is a novel method for adjusting for bias from residual confounding in proportional hazards models. Using standard simulation methods, we compared BRACE with Cox proportional hazards regression in the presence of an unmeasured confounder. We examined estimator distributions, bias, mean squared error (MSE), and coverage probability. We then estimated treatment effects of high versus low intensity treatments in 36,630 prostate cancer, 4,069 lung cancer, and 7,117 head/neck cancer patients, using the Veterans Affairs database. We analyzed treatment effects on cancer-specific mortality (CSM), noncancer mortality (NCM), and overall survival (OS), using conventional multivariable Cox and propensity score (adjusted using inverse probability weighting) models, versus BRACE-adjusted estimates., Results: In simulations with residual confounding, BRACE uniformly reduced both bias and MSE. In the absence of bias, BRACE introduced bias toward the null, albeit with lower MSE. BRACE markedly improved coverage probability, but with a tendency toward overcorrection for effective but nontoxic treatments. For each clinical cohort, more intensive treatments were associated with significantly reduced hazards for CSM, NCM, and OS. BRACE attenuated OS estimates, yielding results more consistent with findings from randomized trials and meta-analyses., Conclusions: BRACE reduces bias and MSE when residual confounding is present and represents a novel approach to improve treatment effect estimation in nonrandomized studies., (©2022 American Association for Cancer Research.)

The NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancers address tumors arising in the oral cavity (including mucosal lip), pharynx, larynx, and paranasal sinuses. Occult primary cancer, salivary gland cancer, and mucosal melanoma (MM) are also addressed. The specific site of disease, stage, and pathologic findings guide treatment (eg, the appropriate surgical procedure, radiation targets, dose and fractionation of radiation, indications for systemic therapy). The NCCN Head and Neck Cancers Panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions, examine relevant new data from publications and abstracts, and reevaluate and update their recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel's most recent recommendations regarding management of HPV-positive oropharynx cancer and ongoing research in this area.