Search

Hospitalizations related to the consequences of opioid use are rising. National guidelines directing in-hospital opioid use disorder (OUD) management do not exist. OUD treatment guidelines intended for other treatment settings could inform in-hospital OUD management.Evaluate the quality and content of existing guidelines for OUD treatment and management.OVID MEDLINE, PubMed, Ovid PsychINFO, EBSCOhost CINHAL, ERCI Guidelines Trust, websites of relevant societies and advocacy organizations, and selected international search engines.Guidelines published between January 2010 to June 2020 addressing OUD treatment, opioid withdrawal management, opioid overdose prevention, and care transitions among adults.We assessed quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument.Nineteen guidelines met the selection criteria. Most recommendations were based on observational studies or expert consensus. Guidelines recommended the use of nonstigmatizing language among patients with OUD; to assess patients with unhealthy opioid use for OUD using the Diagnostic Statistical Manual of Diseases-5th Edition criteria; use of methadone or buprenorphine to treat OUD and opioid withdrawal; use of multimodal, nonopioid therapy, and when needed, short-acting opioid analgesics in addition to buprenorphine or methadone, for acute pain management; ensuring linkage to ongoing methadone or buprenorphine treatment; referring patients to psychosocial treatment; and ensuring access to naloxone for opioid overdose reversal.Included guidelines were informed by studies with various levels of rigor and quality. Future research should systematically study buprenorphine and methadone initiation and titration among people using fentanyl and people with pain, especially during hospitalization.

Appropriate clinical management of opioid withdrawal is a crucial bridge to long-term treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD), because it is a high-risk time for potential opioid overdose and relapse. We provide a narrative review of evidence-based opioid withdrawal management strategies applicable to a variety of treatment settings and geographies. The goals of opioid withdrawal management include relieving suffering associated with withdrawal, providing appropriate diagnosis and screening, engaging patients in initiation of OUD treatment, and using harm reduction strategies, all guided by a patient-centered approach to care. In addition, we discuss complex cases, relapse prevention strategies, and new developments in opioid withdrawal management.

The rising rates of drug use and associated cardiovascular complications, particularly infective endocarditis, have led to poorer health outcomes for people who use drugs (PWUD). The objectives of this scoping review were to identify (1) attitudes of cardiac surgeons toward PWUD and (2) challenges faced in the surgical treatment of drug use-related disease.A comprehensive literature search of three databases was performed with this assistance of a medical librarian. Articles were screened and analyzed for common themes by two independent authors. After literature review, a scoping review was conducted according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses and Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, summarizing existing evidence.Analysis of 35 qualified articles revealed eight themes regarding the perspectives and practices of cardiac surgeons toward PWUD: (1) need for multidisciplinary care teams (45.7%); (2) insufficient resources for treatment of underlying substanceuse disorders (40.0%); (3) stigma toward PWUD (37.1%); (4) willingness of surgeons to operate (31.4%); (5) incomplete guidelines for surgical management of drug-use related infective endocarditis (17.1%); (6) recognizing the importance of psychosocial factors (14.3%); (7) use of drug abstinence contracts (14.3%); and (8) use of stigmatizing language to describe PWUD and/or sterile injection (40.0%).Provision of equitable care for PWUD requires effort from multiple disciplines including cardiothoracic surgeons, infectious disease specialists, addiction medicine specialists, and social workers. Additionally, further research is needed to gather sufficient data for evidence-based guidelines in the treatment of cardiac complications in PWUD.

The opioid overdose epidemic is one of the leading causes of death in adults. Its devastating effects have included not only a burgeoning overdose crisis but also multiple converging infectious diseases epidemics. The use of both opioids and other substances through intravenous (IV) administration places individuals at increased risks of infectious diseases ranging from invasive bacterial and fungal infections to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and viral hepatitis. In 2012, there were 530,000 opioid use disorder (OUD)-related hospitalizations in the United States (US), with $700 million in costs associated with OUD-related infections. The scale of the crisis has continued to increase since that time, with hospitalizations for injection drug use-related infective endocarditis (IDU-IE) increasing by as much as 12-fold from 2010 to 2015. Deaths from IDU-IE alone are estimated to result in over 7,260,000 years of potential life lost over the next 10 years. There have been high-profile injection-related HIV outbreaks, and injection drug use (IDU) is now the most common risk factor for hepatitis C virus (HCV). As this epidemic continues to grow, clinicians in all aspects of medical care are increasingly confronted with infectious complications of IDU. This review will describe the pathogenesis, clinical syndromes, epidemiology, and models of treatment for common infectious complications among persons who inject drugs (PWIDs).

Buprenorphine formulations (including buprenorphine/naloxone) are effective treatments of pain and opioid use disorder (OUD). Historically, perioperative management of patients prescribed buprenorphine involved abstinence from buprenorphine sufficient to allow for unrestricted mu-opioid receptor availability to full agonist opioid (FAO) treatment. Evidence is mounting that a multimodal analgesic strategy, including simultaneous administration of buprenorphine and FAO, nonopioid adjuncts such as acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and regional anesthesia, is a safe and effective perioperative strategy for the patient prescribed long-term buprenorphine treatment of OUD. This strategy will likely simplify management and more seamlessly provide continuous buprenorphine treatment of OUD after hospital discharge.

Injection drug use-related infective endocarditis (IDU-IE) is a complex disease with increasing incidence. Although universally recognized that IDU-IE requires antibiotics and often requires cardiac surgery, most patients do not receive addiction treatment which substantially increases their risk of recurrent IDU-IE from drug use recurrence. Accordingly, a multidisciplinary approach integrating addiction treatment may benefit patients with IDU-IE. We describe the format and structure of a team called the Multidisciplinary Endocarditis Evaluation Team (MEET) whose purpose is to optimize, formalize, and standardize the care of patients with IDU-IE. Given the complexity of IDU-IE, MEET is comprised of addiction medicine, anesthesia, cardiology, cardiac surgery, infectious disease, case management, nursing, and social work. MEET strived to be acceptable to patients and families to support their preferences and values. MEET focused treatment of IDU-IE on the patient's medical and surgical needs with attention to the patients' underlying substance use disorder as an essential component.

Pain management in palliative care (PC) is becoming more complex as patients survive longer with life-limiting illnesses and population-wide trends involving opioid misuse become more common in serious illness. Buprenorphine, a generally safe partial mu-opioid receptor agonist, has been shown to be effective for both pain management and opioid use disorder. It is critical that PC clinicians become comfortable with indications for its use, strategies for initiation while understanding risks and benefits. This article, written by a team of PC and addiction-trained specialists, including physicians, nurse practitioners, social workers, and a pharmacist, offers 10 tips to demystify buprenorphine use in serious illness.

Background: The American Heart Association has sponsored both guidelines and scientific statements that address the diagnosis, management, and prevention of infective endocarditis. As a result of the unprecedented and increasing incidence of infective endocarditis cases among people who inject drugs, the American Heart Association sponsored this original scientific statement. It provides a more in-depth focus on the management of infective endocarditis among this unique population than what has been provided in prior American Heart Association infective endocarditis–related documents. Methods: A writing group was named and consisted of recognized experts in the fields of infectious diseases, cardiology, addiction medicine, and cardiovascular surgery in October 2021. A literature search was conducted in Embase on November 19, 2021, and multiple terms were used, with 1345 English-language articles identified after removal of duplicates. Conclusions: Management of infective endocarditis in people who inject drugs is complex and requires a unique approach in all aspects of care. Clinicians must appreciate that it requires involvement of a variety of specialists and that consultation by addiction-trained clinicians is as important as that of more traditional members of the endocarditis team to improve infective endocarditis outcomes. Preventive measures are critical in people who inject drugs and are cured of an initial bout of infective endocarditis because they remain at extremely high risk for subsequent bouts of infective endocarditis, regardless of whether injection drug use is continued.

Rates of injection-drug use associated infective endocarditis (IDU-IE) are rising, and most patients with IDU-IE do not receive addiction care during hospitalization. We sought to characterize cardiac surgeons' practices and attitudes toward patients with IDU-IE due to their integral role treating them.This is a survey of 201 cardiac surgeons in the U.S who were asked about the addiction care they engage for patients with IDU-IE along with questions pertaining to stigma against people who use drugs (PWUD). Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify patterns in surgeons' practices and determine associations between attitudes toward substance use disorder (SUD) and beliefs about medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD).A minority of surgeons have access to specialty addiction services (35%) in their hospital, but when available 93% consult them for patients with IDU-IE. A quarter of surgeons reported thinking that SUD is a choice and do not believe MOUD have a role in reducing IDU-IE recurrence. Conversely, 69% of surgeons agreed with the disease model of addiction and were four times more likely to believe that MOUD has a role in reducing IDU-IE recurrence (aOR 4.09, 95% CI 1.8-9.27,Access to addiction specialists is limited in most hospital settings, but when available, most surgeons report consulting them and supporting MOUD. However, a significant proportion of surgeons hold non-evidence-based attitudes toward SUD and PWUD. This suggests that lack of education and stigma may affect the care of patients with IDU-IE, highlighting the need for education about, and destigmatization of addiction within health systems.

Hospital-based clinicians frequently care for patients with opioid withdrawal or opioid use disorder (OUD) and are well-positioned to identify and initiate treatment for these patients. With rising numbers of hospitalizations related to opioid use and opioid-related overdose, the Society of Hospital Medicine convened a working group to develop a Consensus Statement on the management of OUD and associated conditions among hospitalized adults. The guidance statement is intended for clinicians practicing medicine in the inpatient setting (e.g., hospitalists, primary care physicians, family physicians, advanced practice nurses, and physician assistants) and is intended to apply to hospitalized adults at risk for, or diagnosed with, OUD. To develop the Consensus Statement, the working group conducted a systematic review of relevant guidelines and composed a draft statement based on extracted recommendations. Next, the working group obtained feedback on the draft statement from external experts in addiction medicine, SHM members, professional societies, harm reduction organizations and advocacy groups, and peer reviewers. The iterative development process resulted in a final Consensus Statement consisting of 18 recommendations covering the following topics: (1) identification and treatment of OUD and opioid withdrawal, (2) perioperative and acute pain management in patients with OUD, and (3) methods to optimize care transitions at hospital discharge for patients with OUD. Most recommendations in the Consensus Statement were derived from guidelines based on observational studies and expert consensus. Due to the lack of rigorous evidence supporting key aspects of OUD-related care, the working group identified important issues necessitating future research and exploration.

(1) Background: The opioid epidemic has led to an increase in cardiac surgery for infective endocarditis (IE-CS) related to injection use of opioids (OUD) and other substances and a call for a coordinated approach to initiate substance use disorder treatment, including medication for OUD (MOUD), during IE-CS hospitalizations. We sought to determine the effects of the initiation of a multi-disciplinary endocarditis evaluation team (MEET) on MOUD use, electrocardiographic QTc measurements and cardiac arrests due to ventricular fibrillation (VF) in patients with OUD. (2) Methods and Results: A historical group undergoing IE-CS at Yale-New Haven Hospital prior to MEET initiation, Group I (43 episodes of IE-CS, 38 patients) was compared to 24 patients undergoing IE-CS after MEET involvement (Group II). Compared to Group l, Group II patients were more likely to receive MOUD (41.9 vs. 95.8%, p < 0.0001), predominantly methadone (41.9 vs. 79.2%, p = 0.0035) at discharge. Both groups had similar QTcs: approximately 30% of reviewed electrocardiograms had QTcs ≥ 470 ms and 17%, QTcs ≥ 500 ms. Cardiac arrests due to VF were not uncommon: Group I: 9.3% vs. Group II: 8.3%, p = 0.8914. Half occurred in the 1–2 months after surgery and were contributed to by pacemaker malfunction/ management and half were related to opioid use. (3) Conclusions: MEET was associated with increased MOUD (predominantly methadone) use during IE-CS hospitalizations without an increase in QTc prolongation or cardiac arrest due to VF compared to Group I, but events occurred in both groups. These arrests were associated with pacemaker issues or a return to opioid use. Robust follow-up of IE-CS patients is essential, as is further research to clarify the longer-term effects of MEET on outcomes.

Buprenorphine formulations (including buprenorphine/naloxone) are effective treatments of pain and opioid use disorder (OUD). Historically, perioperative management of patients prescribed buprenorphine involved abstinence from buprenorphine sufficient to allow for unrestricted mu-opioid receptor availability to full agonist opioid (FAO) treatment. Evidence is mounting that a multimodal analgesic strategy, including simultaneous administration of buprenorphine and FAO, nonopioid adjuncts such as acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and regional anesthesia, is a safe and effective perioperative strategy for the patient prescribed long-term buprenorphine treatment of OUD. This strategy will likely simplify management and more seamlessly provide continuous buprenorphine treatment of OUD after hospital discharge.

Buprenorphine induction can be challenging for patients with chronic pain or patients who are unable to cease opioids for sufficient time to prevent precipitated opioid withdrawal. In the outpatient setting, low-dose buprenorphine induction strategies have been described to avoid these barriers; however, these strategies are not generalizable to the hospital setting where specific medication regulations may apply. We report a novel strategy for hospital-based low-dose buprenorphine initiation that facilitates transition from full opioid agonists to buprenorphine.

Patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) often have concomitant medical conditions requiring hospitalization. This review describes the treatment of patients with OUD in acute care hospitals. Topics addressed include screening hospitalized patients for OUD, hospital initiation of medications for OUD (MOUD), Addiction Medicine Consult Services (AMCS), managing infectious complications of intravenous opioid use, and clinical innovations. Management of opioid withdrawal and initiation of MOUD in hospitalized patients improves engagement in post-discharge addiction treatment. Implementation of an AMCS improves patient and provider outcomes. Care models that promote seamless transitions from the inpatient to outpatient setting for patients with OUD can improve patient outcomes and reduce health care utilization. Comprehensive addiction care for hospitalized patients with OUD improves patient, provider, and health care outcomes. Future studies should define the essential components of this integrated care and establish a new standard for the hospital care of patients with OUD.

The 21st Century Cures Act of 2016 mandates that patients have access to their clinical notes, labs, and imaging through electronic portals and requires information sharing among healthcare entities. We provide practical tips to healthcare professionals on best practices in documenting substance use in the era of transparent electronic medical records, as well as provide guidance on the application of the Cures Act information blocking exceptions for their patients who use substances.

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.

Pain is frequently experienced by hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) patients and survivors of HCT. Effective pain management can be challenging during HCT treatment due to comorbidities and concerns of toxicity related to medications such as acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Oncologists frequently use highly potent opioids to manage patients’ pain and bring relief, particularly for patients who are terminally ill. However, as advances in cancer care improve and more patients are surviving their cancers, oncologists and palliative care providers have needed to rethink their approach to pain and opioid prescribing. The risks associated with long-term prescription opioids are becoming more apparent for some patients who survive HCT. Most oncologists do not feel equipped to address adverse effects related to long-term prescription opioid use, nor have most been educated in the management and treatment options when patients develop the most serious harm of prescription opioid use: severe opioid use disorder. This chapter is intended to provide a framework to offer safer opioid prescribing for pain and help transplant providers understand how to address concerns when they arise.

U.S. cardiac surgeons encounter complex decision-making when treating patients with injection drug use-associated infective endocarditis (IDU-IE). We evaluated surgeons' treatment approaches for IDU-IE compared to non-IDU-IE. This is an anonymous survey of U.S. cardiac surgeons who answered hypothetical infective endocarditis (IE) clinical scenarios that varied based on patient substance use history, addiction treatment, and history of IE. Treatment approaches were classified as operative vs nonoperative. Responses were descriptively analyzed. The survey response rate was 8.7% (n = 208). Survey respondents were mostly male (85.6%) and non-Hispanic white (67.8%), but were from all regions of the United States. Surgeons reported they would operate at similar proportions for patients with native valve non-IDU-IE (63%) and IDU-IE engaged in methadone treatment (64.5%). Most surgeons reported they would operate on patients with recurrent non-IDU-IE (93.1%) compared to only 26.4% for patients with recurrent IDU-IE (P0.001). Most surgeons reported they would place no limits on the number of operations for patients with recurrent non-IDU-IE (73.1%), whereas 83.5% of surgeons would limit the number of surgeries for patients with recurrent IDU-IE (P0.001). Most respondents reported having declined to operate on patients with IDU-IE (63.5%). Cardiac surgeons are less likely to report favoring operative management for primary and recurrent infection in patients with IDU-IE, though patient engagement in methadone treatment increased the likelihood of them taking an operative approach. There is opportunity to standardize the care, including addiction treatment, of patients with IDU-IE to optimize positive short and long-term outcomes.

Purpose: With the current opioid epidemic, U.S. cardiac surgeons are increasingly facing complex medical decision-making for patients with injection drug use-associated infective endocarditis (IDU-IE). Guidelines for IE recommend that normal indications for surgery be applied to IDU-IE. We evaluated cardiac surgeons’ treatment preferences for IDU and non-IDU-IE. Methods: We sent an anonymous survey to 2398 cardiac surgeons in the U.S., of whom 254 (10.6%) responded. Of those respondents, 208 completed the questions of interest. Treatment options were presented as hypothetical clinical scenarios of IE with categorical responses. Scenarios varied based on patient drug use status, patient adherence to addiction treatment, and nature of the valve (recurrent vs. native). Treatment preferences were classified as operative vs non-operative. McNemar and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to determine differences in response to scenarios. Statistical significance was defined as P< 0.05. Respondents’ demographic data were collected. Results: In patients with native valve non-IDU-IE, 131 (63%) would operate, and 77 (37%) would not. For patients with native valve IDU-IE and adherent to addiction treatment, 76 (36.5%) would not operate, while 132 (64.5%) would. In cases of recurrent IE, 175 (93.1%) surgeons would operate on non-IDU-IE vs 55 (26.4%) on IDU-IE. The difference in treatment preference for recurrent IDU-IE vs recurrent non-IDU-IE was statistically significant by McNemar’s test (OR 0.16, CI [0.08, 0.27] P Conclusion: Cardiac surgeons have different treatment preference for IE based on patients' underlying substance use disorder diagnosis. Surgeons are less likely to offer operation for primary and recurrent valve infection to patients with IDU-IE, and patient adherence to addiction treatment may be protective against denial of operation. This indicates a need for increased education of cardiac surgeons on addiction, and a multidisciplinary approach to care in order to address the disparity in treatment and management between IDU-IE and non-IDU-IE.

There are ongoing efforts to lift training requirements for providers to prescribe buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid use disorder. These authors argue that such efforts, while well-meaning,...