Search

Adjuvant therapy; Breast cancer; Olaparib Terapia adyuvante; Cáncer de mama; Olaparib Teràpia adjuvant; Càncer de mama; Olaparib Background The randomized, double-blind OlympiA trial compared 1 year of the oral poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, olaparib, to matching placebo as adjuvant therapy for patients with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 (gBRCA1/2pv) and high-risk, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, early breast cancer (EBC). The first pre-specified interim analysis (IA) previously demonstrated statistically significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant disease-free survival (DDFS). The olaparib group had fewer deaths than the placebo group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance for overall survival (OS). We now report the pre-specified second IA of OS with updates of IDFS, DDFS, and safety. Patients and methods One thousand eight hundred and thirty-six patients were randomly assigned to olaparib or placebo following (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy if indicated. Endocrine therapy was given concurrently with study medication for hormone receptor-positive cancers. Statistical significance for OS at this IA required P < 0.015. Results With a median follow-up of 3.5 years, the second IA of OS demonstrated significant improvement in the olaparib group relative to the placebo group [hazard ratio 0.68; 98.5% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.97; P = 0.009]. Four-year OS was 89.8% in the olaparib group and 86.4% in the placebo group (Δ 3.4%, 95% CI −0.1% to 6.8%). Four-year IDFS for the olaparib group versus placebo group was 82.7% versus 75.4% (Δ 7.3%, 95% CI 3.0% to 11.5%) and 4-year DDFS was 86.5% versus 79.1% (Δ 7.4%, 95% CI 3.6% to 11.3%), respectively. Subset analyses for OS, IDFS, and DDFS demonstrated benefit across major subgroups. No new safety signals were identified including no new cases of acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. Conclusion With 3.5 years of median follow-up, OlympiA demonstrates statistically significant improvement in OS with adjuvant olaparib compared with placebo for gBRCA1/2pv-associated EBC and maintained improvements in the previously reported, statistically significant endpoints of IDFS and DDFS with no new safety signals. Funding for this work, which was conducted as a collaborative partnership among the Breast International Group, NRG Oncology, Frontier Science, AstraZeneca, and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, U.S.A. (MSD), was provided by the National Institutes of Health (grant numbers: U10CA 180868, UG1CA 189867, and U10CA 180822) and by AstraZeneca as part of an alliance between AstraZeneca and MSD. Provision of olaparib and placebo was from AstraZeneca.

Supplementary Figure S3: Molecular characterisation of the MC6 subtype in six TNBC cohorts.

Supplementary Table S16: Results from the gene set enrichment analysis of 28 different immune signatures across the METABRIC-set 15 (MC subtypes) classification. Supplementary Table S17: Table representing the copy number status of the five genes part of the MAPK inactivation score across the METABRIC-set 15 (MC subtypes) classification. Supplementary Table S18: Output of the multivariable logistic regression analysis for the MC6 and the BL1 subtype in Sanofi Phase II. Supplementary Table S19: Output of the multivariable logistic regression analysis for the MC6 and the BL1 subtype in Sanofi Phase III. Supplementary Table S20: Results from the drug screen performed between MC6 and non-MC6 TNBC cell lines.

Supplementary Information: Extended methods.

Supplementary Figure S1. Frequency of genomic aberrations in the KCL TNBC cohort. Supplementary Figure S2. Conceptual diagrams of Scores of Chromosomal Instability Scarring (SCINS). Supplementary Figure S3. Extent and location of SCINS in TNBC. Supplementary Figure S4. Chromosome-wise distribution of SCINS across four TNBC cohorts. Supplementary Figure S5. SCINS-defined tumour classes identify HORMAD1 to be among the top genes linked with Hi-AiCNA/Hi-CnLOH in PrECOG TNBCs. Supplementary Figure S6. Gene expression signatures and HORMAD1 expression. Supplementary Figure S7. Immunofluorescent localisation of HORMAD1 in cell lines. Supplementary Figure S8. Expression of HORMAD1 in breast cancer cell lines and tumour samples. Supplementary Figure S9. HORMAD1 inhibits activity of the DR-GFP HR reporter. Supplementary Figure S10. Effect of HORMAD1 overexpression and knockdown on cell growth and proliferation. Supplementary Figure S11. HORMAD1 promotes activity of the EJ5 NHEJ reporter. Supplementary Figure S12. Effect of HORMAD1 knockdown on 53BP1 and RAD51 foci in HCC1143. Supplementary Figure S13. BRCA1/2 mutation, platinum sensitivity and genomic scarring or HORMAD1 expression. Supplementary Figure S14. Effect of HORMAD1 knockdown on drug sensitivity in HCC1143. Supplementary Figure S15. ROC analysis of PrECOG TNBCs. Supplementary Figure S16. HORMAD1 expression in unselected and BRCA1/2 wildtype TNBCs.

Supplementary Methods, Figure Legends, Table Legends

The molecular complexity of triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) provides a challenge for patient management. We set out to characterize this heterogeneous disease by combining transcriptomics and genomics data, with the aim of revealing convergent pathway dependencies with the potential for treatment intervention. A Bayesian algorithm was used to integrate molecular profiles in two TNBC cohorts, followed by validation using five independent cohorts (n = 1,168), including three clinical trials. A four-gene decision tree signature was identified, which robustly classified TNBCs into six subtypes. All four genes in the signature (EXO1, TP53BP2, FOXM1, and RSU1) are associated with either genomic instability, malignant growth, or treatment response. One of the six subtypes, MC6, encompassed the largest proportion of tumors (∼50%) in early diagnosed TNBCs. In TNBC patients with metastatic disease, the MC6 proportion was reduced to 25%, and was independently associated with a higher response rate to platinum-based chemotherapy. In TNBC cell line data, platinum sensitivity was recapitulated, and a sensitivity to the inhibition of the phosphatase PPM1D was revealed. Molecularly, MC6-TNBCs displayed high levels of telomeric allelic imbalances, enrichment of CD4+ and CD8+ immune signatures, and reduced expression of genes negatively regulating the MAPK signaling pathway. These observations suggest that our integrative classification approach may identify TNBC patients with discernible and theoretically pharmacologically tractable features that merit further studies in prospective trials.

Supplementary Table S1. KCL TNBC and breast cell line cohort characteristics. Supplementary Table S2. Categories of genomic segment used as the basis for measuring SCINS. Supplementary Table S3. Genes expressed in a SAM of different SCINS clusters. Supplementary Table S4. Gene expression signatures of genomic instability.

SWEAVE document. R code for SCINS analysis.

The therapeutic options for patients with noninvasive or invasive breast cancer are complex and varied. These NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines for Breast Cancer include recommendations for clinical management of patients with carcinoma in situ, invasive breast cancer, Paget disease, phyllodes tumor, inflammatory breast cancer, and management of breast cancer during pregnancy. The content featured in this issue focuses on the recommendations for overall management of ductal carcinoma in situ and the workup and locoregional management of early stage invasive breast cancer. For the full version of the NCCN Guidelines for Breast Cancer, visitNCCN.org.

Purpose:Dual inhibition of glucose and glutamine metabolism results in synergistic anticancer effects in solid tumor models. Telaglenastat, an investigational, small-molecule, glutaminase inhibitor, exhibits modest single-agent activity in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients. This phase Ib trial evaluated telaglenastat plus cabozantinib or everolimus, agents known to impair glucose metabolism in patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC).Patients and Methods:mRCC patients received escalating doses of telaglenastat [400–800 mg per os (p.o.) twice daily] in a 3 + 3 design, plus either everolimus (10 mg daily p.o.; TelaE) or cabozantinib (60 mg daily p.o.; TelaC). Tumor response (RECISTv1.1) was assessed every 8 weeks. Endpoints included safety (primary) and antitumor activity.Results:Twenty-seven patients received TelaE, 13 received TelaC, with median 2 and 3 prior therapies, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events were mostly grades 1 to 2, most common including decreased appetite, anemia, elevated transaminases, and diarrhea with TelaE, and diarrhea, decreased appetite, elevated transaminases, and fatigue with TelaC. One dose-limiting toxicity occurred per cohort: grade 3 pruritic rash with TelaE and thrombocytopenia with TelaC. No maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was reached for either combination, leading to a recommended phase II dose of 800-mg telaglenastat twice daily with standard doses of E or C. TelaE disease control rate (DCR; response rate + stable disease) was 95.2% [20/21, including 1 partial response (PR)] among 21 patients with clear cell histology and 66.7% (2/3) for papillary. TelaC DCR was 100% (12/12) for both histologies [5/10 PRs as best response (3 confirmed) in clear cell].Conclusions:TelaE and TelaC showed encouraging clinical activity and tolerability in heavily pretreated mRCC patients.

Supplemental Figure 1. Patient inclusion and exclusion criteria. TNBC: triple negative breast cancer; ALC: absolute lymphocyte count; nSES: neighborhood socioeconomic status. Supplemental Figure 2a and 2b. Association between minimum lymphocyte count (as percentage of total white blood cell count and absolute value) and stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs), N=77. Figure 2a. sTILs were correlated with minimum % lymphocyte (p=0.02). Figure 2b. sTILs did not have a significant correlation with minimum absolute (abs) lymphocytes (p=0.36) Supplemental Figure 3. Comparison between Absolute Lymphocyte Count (ALC) and percent peripheral lymphocytes Supplemental Figure 4. Distribution of Absolute Lymphocyte Count (ALC) measures at baseline, defined as ALC value measured within the first three months of breast cancer diagnosis. Supplemental Figure 5. Distribution of minimum Absolute Lymphocyte Count (ALC) values at any time point Supplemental Figure 6. Distribution of overall minimum Absolute Lymphocyte Count (ALC) over time Supplemental Table 1. Multivariable analysis of predictors of lymphopenia (absolute lymphocyte count [ALC]

Figure S5

Details of the allele frequencies in the tumor specimens of patient 15 who was found to have a somatic reversion mutation of BRCA1 in the residual tumor tissue

Supplementary Figures S1, S2, S3 and Tables S1, S2

Figure S1. Summary of HRD testing in PrECOG and combined cisplatin cohorts; Figure S2. Distribution of HRD scores in PrECOG and combined cisplatin cohorts; Figure S3. Performance of HRD in predicting response in PrECOG and combined cisplatin cohorts; Figure S4. Logistic regression models to predict response in PrECOG and combined cisplatin cohorts; Table S1. Study cohorts for threshold training set; Table S2. Summary statistics of HRD scores in BRCA1/2 deficient samples by tissue in training; Table S3. Patient clinical and demographic data; Table S4. HRD score and association with therapy response in entire cohorts; Table S5. Univariate associations between clinical variables and RCB 0/1 or HR deficiency status; Table S6. Analysis of RCB 0/1 and pCR in combined PrECOG 0105 and Cisplatin Trials cohorts (logistic regression models adjusted for cohort)

Table S1

Purpose: Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) in pretreatment biopsies are associated with improved survival in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We investigated whether higher peripheral lymphocyte counts are associated with lower breast cancer–specific mortality (BCM) and overall mortality (OM) in TNBC.Experimental Design: Data on treatments and diagnostic tests from electronic medical records of two health care systems were linked with demographic, clinical, pathologic, and mortality data from the California Cancer Registry. Multivariable regression models adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, cancer stage, grade, neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy use, radiotherapy use, and germline BRCA1/2 mutations were used to evaluate associations between absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), BCM, and OM. For a subgroup with TIL data available, we explored the relationship between TILs and peripheral lymphocyte counts.Results: A total of 1,463 stage I–III TNBC patients were diagnosed from 2000 to 2014; 1,113 (76%) received neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy within 1 year of diagnosis. Of 759 patients with available ALC data, 481 (63.4%) were ever lymphopenic (minimum ALC n = 70) showed a significant association between TILs and higher peripheral lymphocyte counts during neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Conclusions: Higher peripheral lymphocyte counts predicted lower mortality from early-stage, potentially curable TNBC, suggesting that immune function may enhance the effectiveness of early TNBC treatment. Clin Cancer Res; 24(12); 2851–8. ©2018 AACR.

Purpose:BRCA1/2-mutated and some sporadic triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) have DNA repair defects and are sensitive to DNA-damaging therapeutics. Recently, three independent DNA-based measures of genomic instability were developed on the basis of loss of heterozygosity (LOH), telomeric allelic imbalance (TAI), and large-scale state transitions (LST).Experimental Design: We assessed a combined homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score, an unweighted sum of LOH, TAI, and LST scores, in three neoadjuvant TNBC trials of platinum-containing therapy. We then tested the association of HR deficiency, defined as HRD score ≥42 or BRCA1/2 mutation, with response to platinum-based therapy.Results: In a trial of neoadjuvant platinum, gemcitabine, and iniparib, HR deficiency predicted residual cancer burden score of 0 or I (RCB 0/I) and pathologic complete response (pCR; OR = 4.96, P = 0.0036; OR = 6.52, P = 0.0058). HR deficiency remained a significant predictor of RCB 0/I when adjusted for clinical variables (OR = 5.86, P = 0.012). In two other trials of neoadjuvant cisplatin therapy, HR deficiency predicted RCB 0/I and pCR (OR = 10.18, P = 0.0011; OR = 17.00, P = 0.0066). In a multivariable model of RCB 0/I, HR deficiency retained significance when clinical variables were included (OR = 12.08, P = 0.0017). When restricted to BRCA1/2 nonmutated tumors, response was higher in patients with high HRD scores: RCB 0/I P = 0.062, pCR P = 0.063 in the neoadjuvant platinum, gemcitabine, and iniparib trial; RCB 0/I P = 0.0039, pCR P = 0.018 in the neoadjuvant cisplatin trials.Conclusions: HR deficiency identifies TNBC tumors, including BRCA1/2 nonmutated tumors more likely to respond to platinum-containing therapy. Clin Cancer Res; 22(15); 3764–73. ©2016 AACR.

Purpose: Based on promising preclinical data, we conducted a single-arm phase II trial to assess the clinical benefit rate (CBR) of neratinib, defined as complete/partial response (CR/PR) or stable disease (SD) ≥24 weeks, in HER2mut nonamplified metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity, and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) HER2mut detection.Experimental Design: Tumor tissue positive for HER2mut was required for eligibility. Neratinib was administered 240 mg daily with prophylactic loperamide. ctDNA sequencing was performed retrospectively for 54 patients (14 positive and 40 negative for tumor HER2mut).Results: Nine of 381 tumors (2.4%) sequenced centrally harbored HER2mut (lobular 7.8% vs. ductal 1.6%; P = 0.026). Thirteen additional HER2mut cases were identified locally. Twenty-one of these 22 HER2mut cases were estrogen receptor positive. Sixteen patients [median age 58 (31–74) years and three (2–10) prior metastatic regimens] received neratinib. The CBR was 31% [90% confidence interval (CI), 13%–55%], including one CR, one PR, and three SD ≥24 weeks. Median PFS was 16 (90% CI, 8–31) weeks. Diarrhea (grade 2, 44%; grade 3, 25%) was the most common adverse event. Baseline ctDNA sequencing identified the same HER2mut in 11 of 14 tumor-positive cases (sensitivity, 79%; 90% CI, 53%–94%) and correctly assigned 32 of 32 informative negative cases (specificity, 100%; 90% CI, 91%–100%). In addition, ctDNA HER2mut variant allele frequency decreased in nine of 11 paired samples at week 4, followed by an increase upon progression.Conclusions: Neratinib is active in HER2mut, nonamplified MBC. ctDNA sequencing offers a noninvasive strategy to identify patients with HER2mut cancers for clinical trial participation. Clin Cancer Res; 23(19); 5687–95. ©2017 AACR.

Purpose:To assess talazoparib activity in germline BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with advanced breast cancer.Patients and Methods:ABRAZO (NCT02034916) was a two-cohort, two-stage, phase II study of talazoparib (1 mg/day) in germline BRCA mutation carriers with a response to prior platinum with no progression on or within 8 weeks of the last platinum dose (cohort 1) or ≥3 platinum-free cytotoxic regimens (cohort 2) for advanced breast cancer. Primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by independent radiological assessment.Results:We enrolled 84 patients (cohort 1, n = 49; cohort 2, n = 35) from May 2014 to February 2016. Median age was 50 (range, 31–75) years. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) incidence was 59% (cohort 1) and 17% (cohort 2). Median number of prior cytotoxic regimens for advanced breast cancer was two and four, respectively. Confirmed ORR was 21% [95% confidence interval (CI), 10–35; cohort 1] and 37% [95% CI, 22–55; cohort 2]. Median duration of response was 5.8 and 3.8 months, respectively. Confirmed ORR was 23% (BRCA1), 33% (BRCA2), 26% (TNBC), and 29% (hormone receptor–positive). The most common all-grade adverse events (AE) included anemia (52%), fatigue (45%), and nausea (42%). Talazoparib-related AEs led to drug discontinuation in 3 (4%) patients. In an exploratory analysis, longer platinum-free interval was associated with higher response rate in cohort 1 (0% ORR with interval 6 months).Conclusions:Talazoparib exhibited promising antitumor activity in patients with advanced breast cancer and germline BRCA mutation.

Supplementary methods

Purpose:Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive disease with limited therapeutic options. Antibodies targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) have entered the therapeutic landscape in TNBC, but only a minority of patients benefit. A way to reliably enhance immunogenicity, T-cell infiltration, and predict responsiveness is critically needed.Patients and Methods:Using mouse models of TNBC, we evaluate immune activation and tumor targeting of intratumoral IL12 plasmid followed by electroporation (tavokinogene telseplasmid; Tavo). We further present a single-arm, prospective clinical trial of Tavo monotherapy in patients with treatment refractory, advanced TNBC (OMS-I140). Finally, we expand these findings using publicly available breast cancer and melanoma datasets.Results:Single-cell RNA sequencing of murine tumors identified a CXCR3 gene signature (CXCR3-GS) following Tavo treatment associated with enhanced antigen presentation, T-cell infiltration and expansion, and PD-1/PD-L1 expression. Assessment of pretreatment and posttreatment tissue from patients confirms enrichment of this CXCR3-GS in tumors from patients that exhibited an enhancement of CD8+ T-cell infiltration following treatment. One patient, previously unresponsive to anti–PD-L1 therapy, but who exhibited an increased CXCR3-GS after Tavo treatment, went on to receive additional anti–PD-1 therapy as their immediate next treatment after OMS-I140, and demonstrated a significant clinical response.Conclusions:These data show a safe, effective intratumoral therapy that can enhance antigen presentation and recruit CD8 T cells, which are required for the antitumor efficacy. We identify a Tavo treatment-related gene signature associated with improved outcomes and conversion of nonresponsive tumors, potentially even beyond TNBC.

This supplementary appendix contains a listing of all the investigators involved in the ABRAZO study. It also includes information regarding key eligibility criteria for the study. Finally, a figure showing progression-free survival and overall survival by cohort is given.

Supplementary Data from Telaglenastat Plus Cabozantinib or Everolimus for Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Open-Label Phase I Trial

Table S3

Supplementary Figure from Telaglenastat Plus Cabozantinib or Everolimus for Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Open-Label Phase I Trial

BACKGROUND: Electroporated plasmid interleukin-12 (tavokinogene telseplasmid; TAVO-EP) delivered to accessible tumors by intratumoral injection induces sustained local expression of IL-12. IL-12 is a potent immunoregulatory cytokine that plays a key role in the crosstalk between innate (dendritic, macrophage, and natural killer) and adaptive (T and B) cells, promoting anti-tumor immune responses. TAVO-EP has been shown to induce activation of innate and adaptive tumor-infiltrating and peripheral immune cells, regression of treated and distant untreated lesions (abscopal effect), and expression of PD-L1 in patients with melanoma or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), without the systemic toxicity that limited therapeutic use of IL-12 historically. The combination of TAVO-EP and pembrolizumab has demonstrated durable responses in melanoma patients with immunologically “cold” tumors or with prior progression on anti-PD1 therapy. Anti-PD1 monotherapy has just over 5% overall response rate (ORR) in the second-line or later (2L+) treatment setting for advanced TNBC. New antibody-directed conjugate (ADC) chemotherapy has increased rates of responses compared with prior standard chemotherapy in 2L+ advanced TNBC; however, short duration of response (DOR), and toxicity are issues of concern. Therapies that can induce durable responses with limited toxicity are needed. METHODS: Cohort 1 of this Phase 2, open-label, multicenter study assessed the safety and efficacy of TAVO-EP in combination with pembrolizumab as 2L+ treatment for advanced TNBC. Eligible patients had at least 1 line of prior systemic therapy for advanced or metastatic disease, measurable disease by RECIST v1.1, and ≥1 lesion accessible for TAVO-EP treatment. Patients received pembrolizumab (200 mg IV) every 3 weeks and TAVO-EP (0.5 mg/mL at dose volume of ~1/4 lesion volume) on Days 1, 5, and 8 every 6 weeks. Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was RECIST v.1.1 ORR by investigator review. Secondary endpoints included safety and tolerability, DOR, progression-free survival (PFS), immune-related RECIST (iRECIST) ORR and PFS, disease control rate, and overall survival (OS). ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03567720. RESULTS: Between 01Nov2018 and 30Jan2020, 26 patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of study treatment (median follow up of 11.1 months). Patients had a median of 2 prior lines of systemic therapy for advanced disease (range 1-5). Among 23 patients evaluable for response, the ORR was 17.4% (4 with partial response [PR]). One responder with centrally confirmed PD-L1-negative disease and chest wall and bulky liver metastases had a sustained PR and an iRECIST complete response (CR). One responder had near complete regression of a large fungating chest wall skin lesion. The median DOR was 16.6 months. Median OS was 11.0 months (range 0.6-27.5+). The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) (all grades) were administration site pain and fatigue. Grade 3 TRAEs were reported in 6 patients (23%) including fatigue (11.5%); acute kidney injury, enterocolitis, and myocarditis (3.8% each). There were no Grade 4 or 5 TRAEs. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of TAVO-EP and pembrolizumab in pretreated patients with advanced TNBC resulted in durable RECIST v1.1 responses, including in PD-L1-negative disease, and was well tolerated. This novel immunotherapeutic regimen warrants further evaluation in 2L+ advanced TNBC. Cohort 2 exploring TAVO-EP + pembrolizumab + chemotherapy in frontline TNBC is currently enrolling. Citation Format: Melinda L. Telli, Irene Wapnir, Bianca Devitt, Katharine Cuff, Hatem Soliman, Shaveta Vinayak, David A. Canton, Christopher G. Twitty, Sunny Xie, Ying Lu, Donna Bannavong, Bridget O'Keeffe, Sandra Aung, Rohit Joshi. Durable responses with intratumoral electroporation of plasmid interleukin-12 plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer: Cohort 1 update from KEYNOTE-890 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-14-06.

Background: Following definitive treatment, there is no standard-of-care for patients (pts) with HR+HER2− breast cancer (BC) or TNBC beyond clinical monitoring for metastasis. Recurrence rates remain high for pts with a greater burden of residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Detectable circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is also associated with a high risk of clinical relapse. However, there is no standard therapy for pts with detectable ctDNA who have not yet developed clinical metastasis. Niraparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi), inhibits repair of DNA damage and stalled replication forks. PARPi showed clinical activity in pts with TNBC, with increased responses in homologous recombination deficient (HRd) tumors. HRd is common in TNBC, including in pts with wild-type or mutated tumor BRCA (tBRCAwt and tBRCAm). Neoadjuvant niraparib showed clinical activity in tBRCAm HER2− BC. This study will assess niraparib in pts with tBRCAm HER2− BC or tBRCAwt TNBC who have detectable ctDNA after completion of definitive therapy. Trial Design: ZEST (NCT04915755) is a multicenter, multicohort, Phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in pts with tBRCAm HER2− BC (HR+ with concomitant endocrine therapy and TNBC; Cohort 1) or tBRCAwt TNBC (Cohort 2) with detectable ctDNA following surgery or completion of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Pts who previously completed definitive therapy at any time are eligible for ctDNA monitoring and potential enrollment in the trial following detection of ctDNA. HR+/HER2− pts must have known tBRCAm to qualify for ctDNA screening. For all other pts, tBRCA status will be confirmed in those with detectable ctDNA. HRd status will be assessed at prescreening; pts with tBRCAwt TNBC and HRd will be allocated to Cohort 2. Pts with detectable ctDNA and no recurrence on staging scans will be randomized 1:1 to receive niraparib or placebo. Niraparib will be given orally once daily at a dose of 300 mg; pts with body weight Funding: GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) study 213831; NCT04915755. Medical writing support was provided by Fishawack Indicia, part of Fishawack Health, funded by GSK. Table 1.Key eligibility criteriaInclusion criteriaExclusion criteria• Age ≥18 years• Prior treatment with a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor. • Current treatment with a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor or endocrine therapy other than anastrozole, letrozole, exemestane, and tamoxifen. • Any sign of local recurrence or metastasis. • Lack of definitive response to preoperative chemotherapy by pathologic or radiographic evaluation, in cases where preoperative chemotherapy was administered. • Live vaccine therapy within 30 days of planned start of study randomization. • A second primary malignancy, except (a) adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancer, curatively treated in situ cancer of the cervix, ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast, Stage I Grade 1 endometrial carcinoma; (b) other solid tumors and lymphomas (without bone marrow involvement) diagnosed ≥5 years prior to randomization and treated with no evidence of disease recurrence, and for whom no more than 1 line of chemotherapy was applied. • Pregnancy, breastfeeding, or expecting to conceive children while receiving study treatment and/or for up to 180 days after the last dose of study treatment • History of human immunodeficiency virus • Known history of myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia• Stage I-III breast cancer, with surgical resection of the primary tumor, that is confirmed as either: o triple-negative breast cancer, irrespective of tumor breast cancer gene (tBRCA) status, or o Hormone receptor (HR)+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)- with a documented tBRCA mutation. • Completed prior standard therapy for curative intent including all of the following, if indicated: neoadjuvant treatment, surgery, adjuvant radiotherapy, and adjuvant chemotherapy. • Stable regimen of endocrine therapy, if indicated, for ≥3 months prior to enrollment (HR+ only) • Detectable circulating tumor DNA by central Signatera testing. • An archival tumor tissue specimen of the primary tumor sufficient in quality and quantity for ctDNA assay design and tBRCA and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) testing Citation Format: Nicholas C Turner, David W Cescon, Sibylle Loibl, Wolfgang Janni, Hope Rugo, Judith Balmaña, Cheynna Crowley, Jon Chung, Giulia Fucli, Erin Hofstatter, Tara Frenkl, Melinda L Telli. ZEST: Randomized phase III study evaluating efficacy and safety of niraparib in patients with HER2-negative BRCA-mutated or triple-negative breast cancer with detectable circulating tumor DNA after definitive therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-24-02.

Background: TOPACIO was a phase I/II study evaluating the PARP inhibitor (PARPi) niraparib in combination with the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab in patients with locally advanced and metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC, n=55) and ovarian cancer irrespective of BRCA mutation status. In the efficacy-evaluable population (n=47) the objective response rate (ORR) was 21% and disease control rate (DCR) 49%. Although activity was greater in patients with BRCA mutations (7/15, ORR=47% and 12/15, DCR=80%), durable clinical benefit was seen in patients with wild-type BRCA tumors (3/27, ORR=11% and 9/27, DCR=33%). In a limited cohort of 20 patients with durable clinical benefit, there were 8 BRCA wildtype patients, four of whom had mutations in genes associated with the homologous recombination repair and other DNA damage repair pathways. Pre-treatment tissues were collected and evaluated for tumor PD-L1 status. Patients with PD-L1 positive tumors (28/47, 60%) had a higher response rate (9/28, ORR=32%) than those with PD-L1 negative tumors (1/13, ORR=8%; 6 tumors had unknown PD-L1 status). It remains unstudied whether the tumor’s gene expression profile or immune status in baseline biospecimens is predictive of treatment response. In this study we conducted exploratory biomarker analyses to test the hypothesis that gene expression patterns and immune status are associated with treatment response. Methods: Transcriptional profiling of baseline samples was performed using the BC360 (n=41) and PanCancer IO360 (n=42) panels (Nanostring) and multigene signatures were used to measure tumor and immune activities as well as relative immune cell abundance. Transcriptional analysis was paired with high-dimensional, single-cell cyclic immunofluorescence (CyCIF) of samples that had adequate tissue for analysis (n=19) to characterize the composition and topology of the immune microenvironment at single-cell resolution. Results: Nanostring transcriptional analysis revealed that PAM50 genes stratified tumor samples into 4 subgroups with distinct histology as determined by CyCIF. Each subgroup was capable of responding to niraparib plus pembrolizumab. Multiple genes involved in WNT signaling (WNT5B, TANKS1, TANKS2, PARP4, and NET02) were associated with favorable clinical responses. Low neuropilin and tolloid-like protein 2 (NETO2) gene expression was strongly correlated with favorable progression free survival (PFS; R=-0.61, p=0.0008, Spearman’s correlation), suggesting it may be a predictive biomarker of therapeutic response. Nanostring gene expression signatures for tumor inflammation, apoptosis, and inflammatory chemokines also distinguished responders from non-responders (p Citation Format: Jennifer L Guerriero, Gregory J Baker, Jia-Ren Lin, Yu-An Chen, Ricardo Pastorello, Tuulia Vallius, Janae Davis, Clarence Yapp, Sarah E Church, Eric Miller, Anniina Färkkilä, Shaveta Vinayak, Melinda L Telli, Giulia Fulci, Alan D'Andrea, Geoffrey I Shapiro, Sara M Tolaney, Sandro Santagata, Peter K Sorger, Elizabeth A Mittendorf. High-dimensional, single-cell analysis and transcriptional profiling reveal novel correlatives of response to PARP inhibition plus PD-1 blockade in triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-07-13.

Breast cancer; Cancer Càncer de mama; Càncer Cáncer de mama; Cáncer The METRIC study (NCT#0199733) explored a novel antibody–drug conjugate, glembatumumab vedotin (GV), targeting gpNMB that is overexpressed in ~40% of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and associated with poor prognosis. The study was a randomized, open-label, phase 2b study that evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) of GV compared with capecitabine in gpNMB-overexpressing TNBC. Patients who had previously received anthracycline and taxane-based therapy were randomized 2:1 to receive, GV (1.88 mg/kg IV q21 days) or capecitabine (2500 mg/m2 PO daily d1–14 q21 days). The primary endpoint was RECIST 1.1 PFS per independent, blinded central review. In all, 327 patients were randomized to GV (213 treated) or capecitabine (92 treated). Median PFS was 2.9 months for GV vs. 2.8 months for capecitabine. The most common grade ≥3 toxicities for GV were neutropenia, rash, and leukopenia, and for capecitabine were fatigue, diarrhea, and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia. The study did not meet the primary endpoint of improved PFS over capecitabine or demonstrate a relative risk/benefit improvement over capecitabine. Funding provided by Celldex Therapeutics, Inc.

The recent approval of 4 agents for the treatment of patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer has led to expanded recommendations in the NCCN Guidelines for treatment of this disease. For triple-negative disease, immunotherapy continues to gain traction in this challenging subtype, both in the preoperative and metastatic settings, though not yet as adjuvant treatment. Sacituzumab govitecan is another new agent with strong utility in triple-negative disease, and PARP inhibitors are recommended options in BRCA-mutated disease.

The NCCN Guidelines for Breast Cancer include up-to-date guidelines for clinical management of patients with carcinoma in situ, invasive breast cancer, Paget disease, phyllodes tumor, inflammatory breast cancer, male breast cancer, and breast cancer during pregnancy. These guidelines are developed by a multidisciplinary panel of representatives from NCCN Member Institutions with breast cancer–focused expertise in the fields of medical oncology, surgical oncology, radiation oncology, pathology, reconstructive surgery, and patient advocacy. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on the most recent updates to recommendations for adjuvant systemic therapy in patients with nonmetastatic, early-stage, hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.

Interleukin-12 (IL-12) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine involved in the generation of an inflammatory tumor microenvironment and is critical in eliciting a productive anti-tumor immune response. It has been investigated as an anti-cancer therapeutic using various delivery routes, but intratumoral injection of plasmid IL-12 (tavokinogene telseplasmid; TAVO) followed by electroporation is a gene therapy approach that results in more sustained production of IL-12 locally with minimal systemic immune-related toxicity. Here we show that TAVO not only provides protection in the treated triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) lesion, but also induces a systemic, abscopal effect. Single cell RNAsequencing (scRNAseq) of infiltrating immune cells shows a significant increase in both CD4 and CD8 T cells as well as dendritic cells within the treated lesions, while simultaneously decreasing a granulocytic myeloid derived suppressor population. scRNAseq allows for a detailed look into not only the overall pathway enrichment caused by TAVO treatment, but also the specific receptor-ligand interactions occurring between cell types. A combination of these analyses revealed an enrichment in the IFN-gamma induced PDL1 pathway by TAVO, typified by an increase in the interaction between PDL1 on dendritic cells and PD1 on CD8 T cells. Further, dramatic enrichment of the CXCL9/10/11/CXCR3 axis was observed, consistent with previous studies in melanoma. Analysis of paired TCR alpha and beta chains on T cells additionally demonstrated a dramatic shift in tumor infiltrating T cell (TIL) clonality and frequency. In sum, these preclinical studies identify a signature of increased antigen presentation, T cell infiltration and expansion, and a decrease in the number of granulocytes but also a particular enhancement of the PDL1 immunosuppressive pathway following TAVO treatment. Using this signature, we focus on an in-depth analysis of 2 patients from a single arm, prospective clinical trial of TAVO monotherapy (OMS-I140) in pre-treated advanced TNBC that went on to receive anti-PD-1 as their immediate next therapy with clinical anti-tumor response. Together these data support the combination of TAVO with PD1/PDL1 inhibitors while also identifying other key pathways that may enhance responsiveness in TNBC patients for whom treatment options remain limited. Citation Format: Erika J Crosby, Hiroshi Nagata, Melinda L Telli, Chaitanya R Acharya, Irene Wapnir, Kaitlin Zablotsky, Erica Browning, Reneta Hermiz, Lauren Svenson, Donna Bannavong, Kellie Malloy, David A Canton, Chris G Twitty, Takuya Osada, Herbert Kim Lyerly. Intratumoral delivery of tavokinogene telseplasmid (plasmid IL-12) and electroporation induces an immune signature that predicts successful combination in patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS17-22.

ImportancePreclinical data suggest that poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have synergistic activity when combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs); however, it is unknown which tumor types or molecular subtypes may benefit from this combination.ObjectiveTo investigate responses associated with the combination of avelumab and talazoparib in different tumor types and/or molecular subtypes.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this phase 1b and 2 basket nonrandomized controlled trial, patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled in the following cohorts: non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); DNA damage response (DDR)–positive NSCLC; triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC); hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ERBB2)–negative, DDR-positive breast cancer; recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (OC); recurrent, platinum-sensitive, BRCA1/2-altered OC; urothelial cancer; metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC); DDR-positive mCRPC; and BRCA1/2- or ATM-altered solid tumors. Data were analyzed between June 17, 2021, and August 6, 2021.InterventionsAll patients in phases 1b and 2 received avelumab plus talazoparib.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe phase 1b primary end point was dose-limiting toxic effects. The phase 2 primary end point was objective response, measured as objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included safety, time to response, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival, time to prostate-specific antigen progression and PSA response of 50% or greater (for mCRPC), cancer antigen 125 response (for OC), pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and biomarkers.ResultsA total of 223 patients (mean [SD] age, 63.2 [11.0] years; 117 [52.5%] men) were treated, including 12 patients in phase 1b and 211 patients in phase 2. The recommended phase 2 dose was avelumab 800 mg every 2 weeks plus talazoparib 1 mg once daily. In phase 2, the ORR was 18.2% (95% CI, 5.2%-40.3%) in patients with TNBC; 34.8% (95% CI, 16.4%-57.3%) in patients with HR-positive, ERBB2-negative, and DDR-positive BC; and 63.6% (95% CI, 30.8%-89.1%) in patients with platinum-sensitive, BRCA1/2-altered OC. Responses occurred more frequently in patients with BRCA1/2-altered tumors. Durable responses were observed in patients with TNBC (median [range] DOR, 11.1 [3.4-20.4] months); HR-positive, ERBB2-negative, and DDR-positive BC (median [range] DOR, 15.7 [3.9 to ≥20.6] months); and BRCA1/2-altered OC (median DOR not reached; range, 5.6 to ≥18.4 months). The most common grade 3 or greater treatment-related adverse events were anemia (75 patients [33.6%]), thrombocytopenia (48 patients [21.5%]), and neutropenia (31 patients [13.9%]).Conclusions and RelevanceThis nonrandomized controlled trial found that ORRs for avelumab plus talazoparib were comparable with those with PARP inhibitor or ICI monotherapy. Prolonged DOR in patients with TNBC; HR-positive, ERBB2-negative, and DDR-positive BC; and BRCA1/2-altered OC warrant further investigation in randomized clinical trials. These data highlight the importance of prospective patient selection in future studies of ICI and PARP-inhibitor combinations.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03330405

Purpose: Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with homologous recombination deficient tumors achieve significantly higher pathologic complete response (pCR) rates when treated with neoadjuvant platinum-based therapy. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) are prognostic and predictive of chemotherapy benefit in early stage TNBC. The relationship between TILs, BRCA1/2 mutation status, and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status in TNBC remains unclear. Experimental Design: We performed a pooled analysis of five phase II studies that included patients with TNBC treated with neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy to evaluate the association of TILs with HRD status (Myriad Genetics) and tumor BRCA1/2 mutation status. Furthermore, the relationship between pathologic response assessed using the residual cancer burden (RCB) index and HRD status with adjustment for TILs was evaluated. Results: Among 161 patients, stromal TIL (sTIL) density was not significantly associated with HRD status (P = 0.107) or tumor BRCA1/2 mutation status (P = 0.391). In multivariate analyses, sTIL density [OR, 1.23; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.94–1.61; P = 0.139] was not associated with pCR, but was associated with RCB 0/I status (OR 1.62; 95% CI, 1.20–2.28; P = 0.001). HRD was significantly associated with both pCR (OR 12.09; 95% CI, 4.11–44.29; P = 7.82 × 10−7) and RCB 0/I (OR 10.22; 95% CI, 4.11–28.75; P = 1.09 × 10−7) in these models. Conclusions: In patients with TNBC treated with neoadjuvant platinum-based therapy, TIL density was not significantly associated with either tumor BRCA1/2 mutation status or HRD status. In this pooled analysis, HRD and sTIL density were independently associated with treatment response, with HRD status being the strongest predictor.

Background: Avelumab, a human IgG1 anti–PD-L1 monoclonal antibody, has shown antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in several tumor types. Talazoparib, an orally available PARP inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of patients with deleterious or suspected deleterious germline BRCA1/2-mutated HER2− locally advanced (LA) or metastatic (M) breast cancer (BC). Preclinical data suggest that PARP inhibitors may have synergistic activity when administered in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors. We report results from patients with LA/MBC enrolled in the phase 1b/2, multicohort JAVELIN PARP Medley study (NCT03330405). Methods: In phase 1b (cohort 1), patients with advanced solid tumors who had received ≥1 prior standard of care chemotherapy (CT) regimen were treated with avelumab 800 mg IV every 2 weeks (Q2W) in combination with talazoparib 1.0 mg orally once daily (QD) (dose de-escalation to 0.75 or 0.5 mg permitted following toxicity). In 2 phase 2 cohorts, eligible patients had either LA/M triple-negative BC (TNBC, cohort 2A) or LA/M hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER2−, DNA damage repair defect-positive BC (cohort 2B). Patients in cohort 2A had received 0 to 2 prior CT regimens (no progression on prior platinum-based CT) and patients in cohort 2B had received prior standard of care hormone therapy in either the adjuvant and/or LA/M setting followed by 0 to 2 prior CT regimens (no progression on prior platinum-based CT). The primary endpoint for phase 1b was first-cycle dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and for phase 2 was objective response (investigator assessed per RECIST v1.1). Adverse events (AEs) were characterized using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs v4.03. Results: By the data cutoff on December 24, 2018, 34 patients had been treated in cohorts 1 and 2. Twelve patients with advanced solid tumors were treated in cohort 1 (including 2 patients with TNBC); 3 patients (25.0%) had a first-cycle DLT: grade 3 neutropenia, (n=1) and grade 3 thrombocytopenia, (n=2). Best overall response (BOR) was partial response (PR) in 1 patient, stable disease (SD) in 3, progressive disease (PD) in 6, and non-complete response/non-PD in 1 patient with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and non-measurable disease at baseline; 1 patient was not evaluable for response. Both patients with TNBC had a BOR of SD and remained on treatment for ≥9 months. Objective response rate in this pre-treated and heterogenous population was 8.3% (95% CI, 0.2, 38.5). Based on the phase 1b data, the recommended phase 2 dose was avelumab 800 mg Q2W and talazoparib 1 mg QD. By data cutoff, 22 patients had been treated in cohorts 2A (n=19) and 2B (n=3); median age was 56 and 50 years, respectively. In cohort 2A, 12 patients were evaluable for disease assessment; BOR was PR in 1, SD in 6, and PD in 5. All 3 patients in cohort 2B were non-evaluable for response at data cutoff. Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 11 patients (91.7%) in cohort 1, and 18 (94.7%) patients in cohort 2A. In cohort 2A, the most common TRAEs were anemia (57.9%), nausea (26.3%), fatigue (21.1%) and thrombocytopenia (21.1%); 9 patients (47.4%) had grade ≥3 TRAEs. There were no treatment-related deaths. Safety data from cohort 2B are not reported owing to low patient numbers. Observed pharmacokinetic (PK) data for avelumab 800 mg Q2W were similar to simulated data derived from a population PK model developed using 10 mg/kg dosing. Conclusions: Avelumab 800 mg Q2W administered in combination with talazoparib 1 mg QD in patients with advanced solid tumors, showed preliminary antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile, which was comparable to the safety profiles of the single agents. The study is ongoing; updated safety and efficacy data, and biomarker data will be presented. Citation Format: Timothy A Yap, Panagiotis Konstantinopoulos, Melinda L. Telli, Smita Saraykar, J Thaddeus Beck, Matthew D. Galsky, Jame Abraham, David R. Wise, Mustafa Khasraw, Gabor Rubovszky, Mikhail Dvorkin, Anil A Joy, Mateusz Opyrchal, Daria Stypinski, Colombe Chappey, Ross Stewart, Rossano Cesari, Anita Scheuber, Aditya Bardia. JAVELIN PARP Medley, a phase 1b/2 study of avelumab plus talazoparib: Results from advanced breast cancer cohorts [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-19-03.

A randomized phase II study comparing surgical excision versus NeOadjuvant Radiotherapy followed by delayed surgical excision of Ductal carcinoma In Situ (NORDIS) Breast radiotherapy (RT) for DCIS has been studied only in the adjuvant setting, following lumpectomy surgery. Adjuvant RT reduced invasive recurrences by 52% in the combined analysis of the two largest DCIS trials NSABP B-17/B-24, and reduced recurrences even for low or intermediate grade DCIS in the RTOG 9804 trial (recurrence 0.9% with RT versus 6.7% without RT). The mechanism of action is hypothesized to be elimination of occult disease and/or inhibition of neoplastic transformation in normal breast tissue. Trial Design To understand the ablative effects of RT on pure DCIS, we are conducting a prospective randomized trial comparing histopathological findings of surgical excision (Arm 1) to neoadjuvant partial breast irradiation (neoRT) followed by delayed surgical excision (Arm 2) for patients with core needle biopsy proven DCIS. Arm 1 will provide a reference group for upstaging to invasive cancer, molecular markers and pathological-radiological correlations. Arm 2 participants will receive 6 Gy daily x 5 to the intact tumor with a 0.5 cm margin of normal tissue. Surgical excision will be delayed 12-16 weeks to allow for the radioablative effects to occur and radiation-induced inflammation to subside. Specific Aims To determine if neoRT can completely ablate at least 30% of pure DCISTo determine if DCIS subtypes exhibit differential sensitivity to neoRTTo determine the radiation-induced treatment effects; wound complication rates; radiological Eligibility Women 18 years of age or older with DCIS diagnosed on vacuum assisted core needle biopsy who intend to receive breast conserving surgery are eligible, excluding those with a prior history of ipsilateral breast cancer. The imaging abnormality must be mammographic microcalcifications and/or MRI non-mass enhancement measuring Statistics A total of 50 patients will be recruited. Upstaging to invasive cancer is anticipated to be approximately 10% in the reference group. With 25 subjects in each arm, we will have 80% power to detect a 30% or higher improvement in the DCIS complete response rate following neoRT. Accrual Opened to accrual June 1, 2019 Contact wapnir@stanford.edu Wapnir IL, Dignam JJ, Fisher B, et al. Long-term outcomes of invasive ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences after lumpectomy in NSABP B-17 and B-24 randomized clinical trials for DCIS. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103(6):478-488. doi:10.1093/jnci/djr027. McCormick B, Winter K, Hudis C, et al. RTOG 9804: a prospective randomized trial for good-risk ductal carcinoma in situ comparing radiotherapy with observation. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(7):709-715. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.57.9029. Citation Format: Irene Wapnir, Wendy DeMartini, Kimberly Allison, Kimberly Stone, Frederick Dirbas, Carol Marquez, Debra Ikeda, Sunita Pal, Jacqueline Tsai, Rachel Yang, Robert West, Alex McMillan, Melinda Telli, Kathleen Horst. A randomized phase II study comparing surgical excision versus NeOadjuvant Radiotherapy followed by delayed surgical excision of Ductal carcinoma In Situ (NORDIS) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-09-04.

BACKGROUND: Anti-PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) monotherapy has demonstrated modest activity in pre-treated mTNBC, with single digit objective response rates (ORR) observed. Our prior data suggests that local electroporation after intratumoral administration of tavokinogene telseplasmid (IT-tavo-EP), a plasmid encoding the proinflammatory cytokine IL-12, can render CPI non-responsive pre-treated mTNBC sensitive to CPI therapy. The phase II KEYNOTE-890/OMS-I141 study was therefore designed to evaluate IT-tavo-EP and IV pembrolizumab in patients with mTNBC previously treated with chemotherapy +/- CPI therapy. METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed inoperable locally advanced or metastatic TNBC with at least 1 line of prior systemic therapy for advanced disease, including prior CPI therapy, were eligible. Patients were required to have RECIST v1.1 measurable disease with at least 1 anatomically distinct cutaneous or subcutaneous lesion accessible for intratumoral injection and electroporation. Scans were obtained every 12 weeks. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg IV on day 1 of each 3-week cycle and IT-tavo-EP at a concentration of 0.5 mg/mL and dose volume of ~1/4 of the calculated lesion volume to the accessible lesion(s) on days 1, 5, and 8 every 6 weeks. The primary endpoint of this open-label, non-randomized phase II trial is ORR by investigator review. Secondary endpoints include safety and tolerability of the combined therapy, duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), immune PFS and overall survival. The correlation between changes in the immune cell subsets and response to treatment was also evaluated. RESULTS: At the time of abstract submission, 16 of the planned 25 patients have been enrolled and 11 patients completed a post-treatment RECIST v1.1 assessment at the initial 12-week evaluation or discontinued prior to assessment. Patients had a median of 3 prior lines of therapy for advanced disease. Partial responses have been observed in 3 patients (ORR 27.3%), including a deep confirmed response in a patient with multiple liver, bone, skin and nodal metastases and a short disease-free interval following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Regression of IT-tavo-EP untreated lesions have been observed. Treatment was well tolerated and any grade treatment emergent adverse events (AEs) regardless of attribution were observed in 11 of 16 (68.8%) [grade ≥3 in 6 of 16 (37.5%)]. Only one grade ≥3 AE was attributed to pembrolizumab and none were attributed to IT-tavo or EP. Patients demonstrated immunological responses in blood consistent with an IL-12-associated mechanism of action, including on-treatment reduction of peripheral gMDSC suppressors. Additional biomarker analysis of patient tumor and blood samples are ongoing. CONCLUSIONS: When compared to the results of KEYNOTE-086, which demonstrated a 5.3% ORR in pretreated mTNBC patients with pembrolizumab monotherapy, our preliminary data from patients who have reached an assessment time-point suggests that IT-tavo-EP may enhance sensitivity to pembrolizumab in this patient population. Updated data will be presented. Citation Format: Melinda L. Telli, Irene Wapnir, Bianca Devitt, Katharine Cuff, Hatem Soliman, Shaveta Vinayak, David A. Canton, Christopher Twitty, Kellie Malloy Foerter, Rohit Joshi. Phase 2, open-label study of intratumoral tavokinogene telseplasmid (tavo) plus electroporation in combination with intravenous pembrolizumab therapy in patients with inoperable locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) (KEYNOTE- 890/OMS-I141) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-09-04.

PURPOSE: To understand genetic testing use and decision making among patients with high genetic risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey of breast cancer survivors was administered online by a hereditary cancer nonprofit organization, Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered, from October 2017 to March 2018. RESULTS: Of 1,322 respondents, 46% had breast cancer at age < 45 years, 61% had a first-degree relative with cancer, and 84% underwent genetic testing, of whom 56% had a risk-associated pathogenic variant. Most (86%; 95% CI, 84% to 88%) tested respondents were very satisfied with their testing decision, versus 34% (95% CI, 27% to 41%) of untested respondents. Factors that encouraged testing included relatives’ cancer risk (75%; 95% CI, 73% to 78%), clinicians’ recommendations (68%; 95% CI, 66% to 71%), and potential treatment implications (67%; 95% CI, 64% to 69%). Factors that discouraged testing included insurance concerns (14%; 95% CI, 12% to 16%), cost (14%; 95% CI, 12% to 16%), and discrimination (9%; 95% CI, 7% to 11%). Thirty-nine percent (95% CI, 36% to 41%) recalled hearing from a clinician that genetic discrimination is illegal. Respondents often recalled clinicians informing them about inheritance patterns (65%; 95% CI, 62% to 67%), surgical implications (65%; 95% CI, 63% to 68%), and other cancer risks (66%; 95% CI, 63% to 68%) but less often that results could have potential implications for clinical trial eligibility (38%; 95% CI, 36% to 42%) or targeted therapies (14%; 95% CI, 12% to 16%). Patients who had genetic counseling were twice as likely to recall clinicians informing them about all queried topics. Results did not vary by diagnosis year. CONCLUSION: Among patients with high genetic risk, clinicians’ recommendations, potential treatment implications, and protections against discrimination were motivating factors to undergo genetic testing, but fewer than half recalled clinicians providing all this information, and this did not improve over time. Clinicians influence testing decisions and should inform patients about legal protections and treatment implications.

The NCCN Guidelines for Breast Cancer include up-to-date guidelines for clinical management of patients with carcinoma in situ, invasive breast cancer, Paget disease, phyllodes tumor, inflammatory breast cancer, male breast cancer, and breast cancer during pregnancy. These guidelines are developed by a multidisciplinary panel of representatives from NCCN Member Institutions with breast cancer-focused expertise in the fields of medical oncology, surgical oncology, radiation oncology, pathology, reconstructive surgery, and patient advocacy. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on the most recent updates to recommendations for adjuvant systemic therapy in patients with nonmetastatic, early-stage, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.