Search

Background: The emergence of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) has caused a paradigm shift in anticoagulation therapy, with NOAC being increasingly used compared to vitamin K antagonists. Despite the numerous RCTs with NOAC, further follow-up on how this high risk new drug class is used in real-world clinical practice is warranted. Purpose: This study aimed to describe NOAC use in a primary care sample of long-term NOAC users, and investigated (i) adherence, (ii) patients' perceptions, (iii) drug interactions and (iv) appropriateness of dosing. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in 158 community pharmacies. Participants were home-dwelling adults treated with a NOAC for at least one year. They completed a questionnaire collecting data on socio-demographics, clinical characteristics, current medication use, self-reported adherence to NOAC (via Medication Adherence Report Scale, MARS), and beliefs and perceptions about NOAC (via Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire, BMQ). Adherence to NOAC (selfreported (MARS) and calculated using pharmacy dispensing data (Medication Possession Ratio (MPR)); patients' beliefs and perceptions about NOAC (BMQ); and prevalence of drug interactions and inappropriate dosing (using the recommendations in the summary of product characteristics (SmPC) and the 2018 European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) Practical Guide) were assessed. Results: Participants (n=766) had a mean age of 76.2±8.8 years, several co-morbidities (median of 5 (IQR 4-6)) and high thromboembolic risk (median CHA2DS2-VASc score of 4 (IQR 3-4)). The majority (93.5%) used NOAC for non-valvular atrial fibrillation, while the other 6.5% used it for the prevention of recurrent deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Forty point five percent of the study sample used rivaroxaban, 36.2% apixaban, 21.1% dabigatran and 2.2% edoxaban. About 85% was adherent according to MPR (MPR ≥80%) and self-reported adherence was also high (mean MARS score 24.6±1.0). Two-thirds reported at leastone adverse event of the NOAC, with easy bruising/bleeding being most prevalent (40.2% of patients). BMQ showed that 91.3% of patients favoured the “necessity” over the “concerns” of NOAC use. Thirty-one percent of patients had ≥1 drug interaction(s) with NOAC; amiodarone (10.4% of patients), antiplatelet agents (9.7%) and NSAIDs (9.0%) were the most common interacting drugs. NOAC dosing was inappropriate in 15.9% of patients according to SmPC and in 23.1% according to EHRA. Intriguingly, underdosing was more common using the SmPC as reference, while overdosing was more common using the EHRA guideline. Conclusions: This real-world analysis of NOAC use revealed high adherence and necessity beliefs, drug interactions in 30% of patients, and suboptimal dosing in about one fifth of patients. These findings can inform the design of targeted community pharmacist interventions to improve quality of NOAC use.

About 20% of the European population is older than 65 years. Because of multimorbidity (i.e. multiple chronic condition within a patient), older patients are often prescribed multiple drugs [i.e. polypharmacy). Both older age and polypharmacy significantly increase the risk for adverse drug events. International research showed that more or less 5% of all unplanned hospital admissions is related to the use of medication. About 70% of these drug related admissions happened in patients older than 65 years. Moreover, about half of the admissions could have been avoided. These preventable hospital admissions were caused by the intake of medication without an indication, problems with medication adherence, interactions and/or insufficient monitoring. We define this as (potential Drug Related Problems [DRPI. DRPs can occur on multiple occasions during the medication management process: prescribing, dispensing, intake and monitoring. When DRPs can be detected in an early stage, significant consequences can be avoided. To accomplish this, multiple strategies are possible. One of the possibilities is performing a periodic medication screening by the community pharmacist in patient groups at risk. During such a medication screening, the pharmacotherapy is critically evaluated in a systematic and structured way. The implementation of medication screening in first-line health care is currently limited. The community pharmacist is nevertheless ideally placed to perform this task. There is an important relation of trust between him and the patient and the community pharmacist has access to a full medication history. Furthermore, as an expert in drug-related issues, he possesses all necessary knowledge to perform the pharmacotherapeutic analysis.

Few well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCT) regarding the impact of community pharmacist interventions on pharmacotherapeutic monitoring of patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [COPD) have been conducted. We assessed the effectiveness of a pharmaceutical care program for patients with COPD.The PHARMACOP-trial was a single-blind 3-month RCT, conducted in 170 community pharmacies in Belgium, enrolling patients prescribed daily COPD medication, agedor = 50 years, and with a smoking historyor = 10 pack-years. A computer-generated randomization sequence allocated patients to intervention (n = 371), receiving protocol-defined pharmacist care, or control group (n = 363), receiving usual pharmacist care 11:1 ratio, stratified by center). Interventions, focusing on inhalation technique and adherence to maintenance therapy, were carried out at start of the trial and at one month follow-up. Primary outcomes were inhalation technique and medication adherence. Secondary outcomes were exacerbation rate, dyspnea, COPD specific and generic health status and smoking behavior.From December 2010 to April 2011, 734 patients were enrolled. 42 patients (5.7%) were lost to follow-up. At the end of the trial, inhalation score (Mean estimated difference [delta], 13.5%; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 10.8-16.1; P.0001] and medication adherence [(delta, 8.51%; 95% CI, 4.63-12.4; P.0001) were significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control group. In the intervention group, a significantly lower hospitalization rate was observed (9 vs 35 hospitalizations; Rate Ratio, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.12-0.64; P = .003). No other significant between-group differences were observed.The PHARMACOP-trial demonstrates that pragmatic pharmacist care programs improve both inhalation technique and medication adherence in patients with COPD and could reduce hospitalization rates. The protocolled intervention used in this trial was specifically designed for and evaluated in (Belgian) community pharmacies. This may facilitate future implementation in the Belgian context.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Few well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCT) regarding the impact of community pharmacist interventions on pharmacotherapeutic monitoring of patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [COPD) have been conducted. We assessed the effectiveness of a pharmaceutical care program for patients with COPD. METHODS: The PHARMACOP-trial was a single-blind 3-month RCT, conducted in 170 community pharmacies in Belgium, enrolling patients prescribed daily COPD medication, aged > or = 50 years, and with a smoking history > or = 10 pack-years. A computer-generated randomization sequence allocated patients to intervention (n = 371), receiving protocol-defined pharmacist care, or control group (n = 363), receiving usual pharmacist care 11:1 ratio, stratified by center). Interventions, focusing on inhalation technique and adherence to maintenance therapy, were carried out at start of the trial and at one month follow-up. Primary outcomes were inhalation technique and medication adherence. Secondary outcomes were exacerbation rate, dyspnea, COPD specific and generic health status and smoking behavior. RESULTS: From December 2010 to April 2011, 734 patients were enrolled. 42 patients (5.7%) were lost to follow-up. At the end of the trial, inhalation score (Mean estimated difference [delta], 13.5%; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 10.8-16.1; P < .0001] and medication adherence [(delta, 8.51%; 95% CI, 4.63-12.4; P < .0001) were significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control group. In the intervention group, a significantly lower hospitalization rate was observed (9 vs 35 hospitalizations; Rate Ratio, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.12-0.64; P = .003). No other significant between-group differences were observed. CONCLUSION: The PHARMACOP-trial demonstrates that pragmatic pharmacist care programs improve both inhalation technique and medication adherence in patients with COPD and could reduce hospitalization rates. The protocolled intervention used in this trial was specifically designed for and evaluated in (Belgian) community pharmacies. This may facilitate future implementation in the Belgian context.

Counseling of patients filling a first prescription is an essentiaL aspect of pharmaceutical care. The use of a protocol summarizing all relevant counseling aspects can be a useful tool to standardize pharmaceutical care and to promote impLementation.(1) To develop a protocol for counseling of patients starting with oral hypoglycaemic agents (OHA), and (2) to investigate current provision of counseling for these patients in Belgian community pharmacies.Based on literature, a consensus meeting with community pharmacists and consultation with physicians, we developed a protocol for counseling patients starting OHA. Additionally, an observational study of current provision of counseling for patients starting OHA was performed in 90 community pharmacies.All pharmacists reported to provide the most important item of our protocol, i.e. dose and timing of OHA intake. All other protocol items were provided by a smaller proportion of pharmacists: indication (by 64.4% of pharmacists), mechanism of action (30.0%), what to do if a dose is missed (3.3%), side effects (34.4%), hypoglycaemia (24.4%) and Lifestyle advice (68.9%). About 45% of pharmacists reported to give written drug information to patients starting OHA. Reduction of the administrative workload was most frequently mentioned as measure to spend more time on patient counseling. The majority of pharmacists considered our protocol as feasible and appLicabLe in daily pharmacy practice.This study found that current counseLing practices for patients starting OHA can be improved. Our protocol could be a useful and feasible tool to facilitate implementation of first prescription counseling.

To investigate (i) Ramadan participation, (ii) provision of Ramadan related advice by healthcare providers (iii) medication use during Ramadan fasting among Turkish migrants with diabetes in Belgium.This pilot observational study was conducted among a convenience sample of 52 Turkish migrants with diabetes in Belgium. Two questionnaires collected information on socio-demographic characteristics, diabetes related characteristics, current hypoglycaemic medication with dosing regimen, participation in the past Ramadan, reasons for (non)participation, use of hypoglycaemic medication during the past Ramadan, advice from their healthcare providers about fasting during Ramadan and follow up of this advice.Sixteen patients (31%) had fasted during the past Ramadan. Main reason for Ramadan participation was reinforcement of faith (12/15), while the main reason for non participation was having diabetes (34/36). About 56% of the study population had received recommendations from their healthcare provider(s) about fasting and diabetes during Ramadan. The most commonly provided advice was not to participate in Ramadan, followed by modification of drug therapy. Only 3 patients ignored the advice of their healthcare professionals. In addition, only 60% of those who actually fasted received recommendations about intake of diabetes medication during the ramadan. Most fasters continued their medication dose unchanged (87% of OHA users and 80% of the insulin users).This pilot study found a low prevalence of Ramadan fasting among Turkish migrants with diabetes in Belgium. We also found that provision of advice by healthcare providers could be improved. Larger scale studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

/

This observational study aimed to provide a detailed description of (i) drug therapy, (ii) drug adherence, (iii) inhalation technique, and (iv) health status of COPD patients recruited via community pharmacies. Based on these results, problem areas can be detected and targeted pharmacist interventions for improvement of COPD management could be developed.We conducted a cross-sectional, observational study in 93 pharmacies (Belgium). Participants (n = 555) completed a questionnaire collecting personal characteristics, smoking history, influenza vaccination, COPD medication and side effects. Adherence to COPD maintenance medication was analysed 1 year-retrospectively through prescription refill rates. Inhalation technique was scored using a checklist.The COPD patients had a mean age of 68.6 yr, 73.7% were men and 37.2% were current smokers. The influenza vaccination status was significantly lower in patients aged65 yr (65.7%) than in patients agedor = 65 years (86.2%) (p0.001). Fixed combinations of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta2-agonists were the most frequently used COPD medications (75.4%). About 48% of patients was underadherent (80% adherence), 47% was adherent (80-120% adherence) and 5% was overadherent (120% adherence). Twenty-one % of patients made major inhalation technique errors with rescue medication; these were all errors in handling pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDI's).This study on COPD management in primary care highlights 4 main aspects which could be improved: (i) drug adherence, (ii) inhalation technique with pMDI's, (iii) influenza vaccination in COPD patientsyr and (iv) smoking cessation.

/