Search

PURPOSE: The proPSMA trial at ten Australian centers demonstrated increased sensitivity and specificity for PSMA PET/CT compared to conventional imaging regarding metastatic status in primary high-risk prostate cancer patients. A cost-effectiveness analysis showed benefits of PSMA PET/CT over conventional imaging for the Australian setting. However, comparable data for other countries are lacking. Therefore, we aimed to verify the cost-effectiveness of PSMA PET/CT in several European countries as well as the USA. METHODS: Clinical data on diagnostic accuracy were derived from the proPSMA trial. Costs for PSMA PET/CT and conventional imaging were taken from reimbursements of national health systems and individual billing information of selected centers in Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and the USA. For comparability, scan duration and the decision tree of the analysis were adopted from the Australian cost-effectiveness study. RESULTS: In contrast to the Australian setting, PSMA PET/CT was primarily associated with increased costs in the studied centers in Europe and the USA. Mainly, the scan duration had an impact on the cost-effectiveness. However, costs for an accurate diagnosis using PSMA PET/CT seemed reasonably low compared to the potential consequential costs of an inaccurate diagnosis. CONCLUSION: We assume that the use of PSMA PET/CT is appropriate from a health economic perspective, but this will need to be verified by a prospective evaluation of patients at initial diagnosis.

Objective: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is the standard of care for acute large vessel occlusion stroke. Recently, the ANGEL-ASPECT and SELECT 2 trials showed improved outcomes in patients with acute ischemic Stroke presenting with large infarcts. The cost-effectiveness of EVT for this subpopulation of stroke patients has only been calculated using data from the previously published RESCUE-Japan LIMIT trial. It is, therefore, limited in its generalizability to an international population. With this study we primarily simulated patient-level costs to analyze the economic potential of EVT for patients with large ischemic stroke from a public health payer perspective based on the recently published data and secondarily identified determinants of cost-effectiveness. Methods: Costs and outcome of patients treated with EVT or only with the best medical care based on the recent prospective clinical trials ANGEL-ASPECT, SELECT2 and RESCUE-Japan LIMIT. A A Markov model was developed using treamtment outcomes derived from the most recent available literature. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses addressed uncertainty. Results: Endovascular treatment resulted in an incremental gain of 1.32 QALYs per procedure with cost savings of $17,318 per patient. Lifetime costs resulted to be most sensitive to the costs of the endovascular procedure. Conclusion: EVT is a cost-saving (i.e., dominant) strategy for patients presenting with large ischemic cores defined by inclusion criteria of the recently published ANGEL-ASPECT, SELECT2, and RESCUE-Japan LIMIT trials in comparison to best medical care in our simulation. Prospective data of individual patients need to be collected to validate these results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The novel 18F-labeled somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-directed radiotracer [18F]SiTATE demonstrated promising results for the imaging of various SSTR-expressing tumor types. Although thyroid carcinomas (TC) express SSTR, data on [18F]SiTATE PET/CT imaging in TC are lacking. This study explores the use of [18F]SiTATE PET/CT in a patient cohort with histologically proven TC.As part of a prospective observational study at a single tertiary cancer center, 21 patients with TC (10 medullary (MTC) and 11 differentiated (DTC)) who underwent at least one [18F]SiTATE PET/CT were included (37 scans in total). Mean SUVmax and SUVmean of tumoral lesions, mean total-tumor-volume (TTV), and whole-body (WB)-SUVmax and WB-SUVmean on PET with their standard deviations (SDs) were determined. PET parameters were correlated to clinical parameters including tumor marker levels (thyroglobulin for DTC, calcitonin for MTC).89 lesions were included in the analysis. Metastases were localized in the bone, lymph nodes, lung, soft tissue, and thyroid bed. Osseous (31 lesions; SUVmax 8.6 ± 8.0; SUVmean 5.8 ± 5.4) and nodal (37 lesions; SUVmax 8.7 ± 7.8; SUVmean 5.7 ± 5.4) metastases showed the highest uptake. The MTC disease burden on PET significantly correlated with the calcitonin tumor marker level (e.g., TTV: r = 0.771, r2 = 0.594, p = 0.002). For DTC, no such correlation was present.Our data demonstrate high feasibility of [18F]SiTATE PET/CT in a small cohort of patients with MTC and DTC. The use of [18F]SiTATE may overcome logistical disadvantages of 68Ga-based tracers and facilitate SSTR-targeted PET/CT imaging of thyroid carcinoma.Methods: The novel 18F-labeled somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-directed radiotracer [18F]SiTATE demonstrated promising results for the imaging of various SSTR-expressing tumor types. Although thyroid carcinomas (TC) express SSTR, data on [18F]SiTATE PET/CT imaging in TC are lacking. This study explores the use of [18F]SiTATE PET/CT in a patient cohort with histologically proven TC.As part of a prospective observational study at a single tertiary cancer center, 21 patients with TC (10 medullary (MTC) and 11 differentiated (DTC)) who underwent at least one [18F]SiTATE PET/CT were included (37 scans in total). Mean SUVmax and SUVmean of tumoral lesions, mean total-tumor-volume (TTV), and whole-body (WB)-SUVmax and WB-SUVmean on PET with their standard deviations (SDs) were determined. PET parameters were correlated to clinical parameters including tumor marker levels (thyroglobulin for DTC, calcitonin for MTC).89 lesions were included in the analysis. Metastases were localized in the bone, lymph nodes, lung, soft tissue, and thyroid bed. Osseous (31 lesions; SUVmax 8.6 ± 8.0; SUVmean 5.8 ± 5.4) and nodal (37 lesions; SUVmax 8.7 ± 7.8; SUVmean 5.7 ± 5.4) metastases showed the highest uptake. The MTC disease burden on PET significantly correlated with the calcitonin tumor marker level (e.g., TTV: r = 0.771, r2 = 0.594, p = 0.002). For DTC, no such correlation was present.Our data demonstrate high feasibility of [18F]SiTATE PET/CT in a small cohort of patients with MTC and DTC. The use of [18F]SiTATE may overcome logistical disadvantages of 68Ga-based tracers and facilitate SSTR-targeted PET/CT imaging of thyroid carcinoma.Results: The novel 18F-labeled somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-directed radiotracer [18F]SiTATE demonstrated promising results for the imaging of various SSTR-expressing tumor types. Although thyroid carcinomas (TC) express SSTR, data on [18F]SiTATE PET/CT imaging in TC are lacking. This study explores the use of [18F]SiTATE PET/CT in a patient cohort with histologically proven TC.As part of a prospective observational study at a single tertiary cancer center, 21 patients with TC (10 medullary (MTC) and 11 differentiated (DTC)) who underwent at least one [18F]SiTATE PET/CT were included (37 scans in total). Mean SUVmax and SUVmean of tumoral lesions, mean total-tumor-volume (TTV), and whole-body (WB)-SUVmax and WB-SUVmean on PET with their standard deviations (SDs) were determined. PET parameters were correlated to clinical parameters including tumor marker levels (thyroglobulin for DTC, calcitonin for MTC).89 lesions were included in the analysis. Metastases were localized in the bone, lymph nodes, lung, soft tissue, and thyroid bed. Osseous (31 lesions; SUVmax 8.6 ± 8.0; SUVmean 5.8 ± 5.4) and nodal (37 lesions; SUVmax 8.7 ± 7.8; SUVmean 5.7 ± 5.4) metastases showed the highest uptake. The MTC disease burden on PET significantly correlated with the calcitonin tumor marker level (e.g., TTV: r = 0.771, r2 = 0.594, p = 0.002). For DTC, no such correlation was present.Our data demonstrate high feasibility of [18F]SiTATE PET/CT in a small cohort of patients with MTC and DTC. The use of [18F]SiTATE may overcome logistical disadvantages of 68Ga-based tracers and facilitate SSTR-targeted PET/CT imaging of thyroid carcinoma.Conclusion: The novel 18F-labeled somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-directed radiotracer [18F]SiTATE demonstrated promising results for the imaging of various SSTR-expressing tumor types. Although thyroid carcinomas (TC) express SSTR, data on [18F]SiTATE PET/CT imaging in TC are lacking. This study explores the use of [18F]SiTATE PET/CT in a patient cohort with histologically proven TC.As part of a prospective observational study at a single tertiary cancer center, 21 patients with TC (10 medullary (MTC) and 11 differentiated (DTC)) who underwent at least one [18F]SiTATE PET/CT were included (37 scans in total). Mean SUVmax and SUVmean of tumoral lesions, mean total-tumor-volume (TTV), and whole-body (WB)-SUVmax and WB-SUVmean on PET with their standard deviations (SDs) were determined. PET parameters were correlated to clinical parameters including tumor marker levels (thyroglobulin for DTC, calcitonin for MTC).89 lesions were included in the analysis. Metastases were localized in the bone, lymph nodes, lung, soft tissue, and thyroid bed. Osseous (31 lesions; SUVmax 8.6 ± 8.0; SUVmean 5.8 ± 5.4) and nodal (37 lesions; SUVmax 8.7 ± 7.8; SUVmean 5.7 ± 5.4) metastases showed the highest uptake. The MTC disease burden on PET significantly correlated with the calcitonin tumor marker level (e.g., TTV: r = 0.771, r2 = 0.594, p = 0.002). For DTC, no such correlation was present.Our data demonstrate high feasibility of [18F]SiTATE PET/CT in a small cohort of patients with MTC and DTC. The use of [18F]SiTATE may overcome logistical disadvantages of 68Ga-based tracers and facilitate SSTR-targeted PET/CT imaging of thyroid carcinoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: With the advent of disease-modifying therapies, accurate assessment of biomarkers indicating the presence of disease-associated amyloid beta (Aβ) pathology becomes crucial in patients with clinically suspected Alzheimer's disease (AD). We evaluated Aβ levels in cerebrospinal fluid (Aβ CSF) and Aβ levels in positron emission tomography (Aβ PET) biomarkers in a real-world memory-clinic setting to develop an efficient algorithm for clinical use., Methods: Patients were evaluated for AD-related Aβ pathology from two independent cohorts (Ludwig Maximilian University [LMU], n  = 402, and Medical University of Vienna [MUV], n  = 144). Optimal thresholds of CSF biomarkers were deduced from receiver operating characteristic curves and validated against Aβ PET positivity., Results: In both cohorts, a CSF Aβ42/40 ratio ≥ 7.1% was associated with a low risk of a positive Aβ PET scan (negative predictive value: 94.3%). Implementing two cutoffs revealed 14% to 16% of patients with intermediate results (CSF Aβ42/40 ratio: 5.5%-7.1%), which had a strong benefit from Aβ PET imaging (44%-52% Aβ PET positivity)., Discussion: A two-cutoff approach for CSF Aβ42/40 including Aβ PET imaging at intermediate results provides an effective assessment of Aβ pathology in real-world settings., Highlights: We evaluated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and positron emission tomography (PET) amyloid beta (Aβ) biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease in real-world cohorts.A CSF Aβ 42/40 ratio between 5.5% and 7.1% defines patients at borderline levels.Patients at borderline levels strongly benefit from additional Aβ PET imaging.Two-cutoff CSF Aβ 42/40 and PET will allow effective treatment stratification., Competing Interests: A.D. reports research support by Siemens Healthineers, Life Molecular Imaging, GE Healthcare, AVID Radiopharmaceuticals, Sofie, Eisai, Novartis/AAA, Ariceum Therapeutics as well as speaker honorary/advisory boards by Siemens Healthineers, Sanofi, GE Healthcare, Biogen, Novo Nordisk, Invicro, Novartis/AAA, Bayer Vital, Lilly; stock by Siemens Healthineers, Lantheus Holding, Structured therapeutics, Lilly; and a patent for 18F‐JK‐PSMA‐ 7 (Patent No.: EP3765097A1; Date of patent: Jan. 20, 2021). E.S. has received grants from Roche, Eisai, FFG/AAL, Horizon2020, and the Austrian Alzheimer Association (all to the institution); consulting fees from Biogen, Eisai, and Lilly; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Roche; and has received payment for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events by Biogen, Roche, Eisai, and Novartis. E.S. has participated on advisory boards (Biogen, Roche, Eisai, Sanofi) and held leadership or a fiduciary role in scientific societies (Austrian Alzheimer Association, the EAN scientific panel dementia). J.L. reports speaker fees from Bayer Vital, Biogen, EISAI, TEVA, Esteve, Zambon, and Roche; consulting fees from Axon Neuroscience, EISAI, and Biogen; author fees from Thieme medical publishers and W. Kohlhammer GmbH medical publishers; and is an inventor in a patent “Oral Phenylbutyrate for Treatment of Human 4‐Repeat Tauopathies” (EP 23 156 122.6) filed by LMU Munich. In addition, he reports compensation for serving as chief medical officer for MODAG GmbH, is a beneficiary of the phantom share program of MODAG GmbH, and is an inventor in a patent “Pharmaceutical Composition and Methods of Use” (EP 22 159 408.8) filed by MODAG GmbH, all activities outside the submitted work. M.B. is a member of the Neuroimaging Committee of the EANM. M.B. received speaker honoraria from Roche, GE Healthcare, and Life Molecular Imaging and served as an advisor of MIAC and Life Molecular Imaging. N.F. has received speaker honoraria from Eisai, GE Healthcare, Life Molecular Imaging, and Consulting Honoraria from MSD. R.P. has received honoraria for advisory boards and speaker engagements from Roche, EISAI, Eli Lilly, Biogen, Janssen‐Cilag, Astra Zeneca, Schwabe, Grifols, Novo Nordisk, and Tabuk. W.G.K. reports consulting fees from BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Need Inc., mintMedical, and FalkFoundation (unrelated to the paper). All other authors declare no competing interests. Author disclosures are available in the supporting information., (© 2024 The Author(s). Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.)