Search

Salimah H Meghani,1,2 Ryan Quinn,1 Rebecca Ashare,3,4 Kristin Levoy,1,5,6 Brooke Worster,7 Mary Naylor,1,2 Jesse Chittams,1 Martin Cheatle8 1Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, NewCourtland Center for Transitions and Health, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; 2Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; 3Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; 4Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA; 5Department of Community and Health Systems, School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA; 6Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, USA; 7Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA; 8Department of Psychiatry and Anesthesiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USACorrespondence: Salimah H MeghaniDepartment of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, NewCourtland Center for Transitions and Health, Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USATel +215 573-7128Email meghanis@nursing.upenn.eduIntroduction: Based on many published reports, African American patients with cancer experience higher pain severity scores and lower pain relief than White patients. This disparity results from undertreatment of pain and is compounded by low adherence to prescribed non-opioid and opioid analgesics among African American patients with cancer. While nearly one in four patients use cannabis to manage cancer-related symptoms, less is known about how cannabis use influences pain relief in this patient population.Methods: This study is based on preliminary data from an ongoing study of longitudinal outcomes of opioid therapy among African American and White patients with cancer. Linear mixed-effects models were utilized to assess the interaction of race and cannabis use on pain relief using “least pain” item scores from the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) averaged across three time points. Models were adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical variables.Results: This analysis included 136 patients (49 African American, 87 White). Overall, 30.1% of the sample reported cannabis use for cancer pain. The mean “least pain” score on BPI was 3.3 (SD=2.42) on a scale of 0– 10. African American patients had a mean “least pain” score 1.32± 0.48 units higher (indicating lower pain relief) than White patients (p=0.006). Cannabis use did not have a significant main effect (p=0.28). However, cannabis use was a significant moderator of the relationship between race and “least pain” (p=0.03). In the absence of cannabis use, African Americans reported higher “least pain” scores compared to Whites (mean difference=1.631± 0.5, p=0.001). However, this disparity was no longer observed in African American patients reporting cannabis use (mean “least pain” difference=0.587± 0.59, p=0.32).Conclusion: These findings point to the possible role of cannabis in cancer pain management and its potential to reduce racial disparities. These findings are preliminary and further research into the role of cannabis in cancer pain outcomes is needed.Keywords: pain, cancer pain, pain relief, pain disparities, cannabis

Salimah H Meghani,1 George J Knafl2 1Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, NewCourtland Center of Transitions and Health, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 2School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA Background: Studies in chronic noncancer pain settings have found that opioid use increases health care utilization. Despite the key role of analgesics, specifically opioids, in the setting of cancer pain, there is no literature to our knowledge about the relationship between adherence to prescribed around-the-clock (ATC) analgesics and acute health care utilization (hospitalization) among patients with cancer pain. Purpose: To identify adherence patterns over time for cancer patients taking ATC analgesics for pain, cluster these patterns into adherence types, combine the types into an adherence risk factor for hospitalization, identify other risk factors for hospitalization, and identify risk factors for inconsistent analgesic adherence. Materials and methods: Data from a 3-month prospective observational study of patients diagnosed with solid tumors or multiple myeloma, having cancer-related pain, and having at least one prescription of oral ATC analgesics were collected. Adherence data were collected electronically using the medication event-monitoring system. Analyses were conducted using adaptive modeling methods based on heuristic search through alternative models controlled by likelihood cross-validation scores. Results: Six adherence types were identified and combined into the risk factor for hospitalization of inconsistent versus consistent adherence over time. Twenty other individually significant risk factors for hospitalization were identified, but inconsistent analgesic adherence was the strongest of these predictors (ie, generating the largest likelihood cross-validation score). These risk factors were adaptively combined into a model for hospitalization based on six pairwise interaction risk factors with exceptional discrimination (ie, area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve of 0.91). Patients had from zero to five of these risk factors, with an odds ratio of 5.44 (95% confidence interval 3.09–9.58) for hospitalization, with a unit increase in the number of such risk factors. Conclusion: Inconsistent adherence to prescribed ATC analgesics, specifically the interaction of strong opioids and inconsistent adherence, is a strong risk factor for hospitalization among cancer outpatients with pain. Keywords: cancer pain, opioids, analgesics, medication adherence, MEMS, hospitalization

Abstract Background Men with prostate cancer are often challenged to choose between conservative management and a range of available treatment options each carrying varying risks and benefits. The trade-offs are between an improved life-expectancy with treatment accompanied by important risks such as urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction. Previous studies of preference elicitation for prostate cancer treatment have found considerable heterogeneity in individuals' preferences for health states given similar treatments and clinical risks. Methods Using latent class mixture model (LCA), we first sought to understand if there are unique patterns of heterogeneity or subgroups of individuals based on their prostate cancer treatment utilities (calculated time trade-off utilities for various health states) and if such unique subgroups exist, what demographic and urological variables may predict membership in these subgroups. Results The sample (N = 244) included men with prostate cancer (n = 188) and men at-risk for disease (n = 56). The sample was predominantly white (77%), with mean age of 60 years (SD ± 9.5). Most (85.9%) were married or living with a significant other. Using LCA, a three class solution yielded the best model evidenced by the smallest Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), substantial reduction in BIC from a 2-class solution, and Lo-Mendell-Rubin significance of < .001. The three identified clusters were named high-traders (n = 31), low-traders (n = 116), and no-traders (n = 97). High-traders were more likely to trade survival time associated with treatment to avoid potential risks of treatment. Low-traders were less likely to trade survival time and accepted risks of treatment. The no-traders were likely to make no trade-offs in any direction favouring the status quo. There was significant difference among the clusters in the importance of sexual activity (Pearson's χ2 = 16.55, P = 0.002; Goodman and Kruskal tau = 0.039, P < 0.001). In multinomial logistic regression, the level of importance assigned to sexual activity remained an independent predictor of class membership. Age and prostate cancer/at-risk status were not significant factors in the multinomial model. Conclusion Most existing utility work is undertaken focusing on how people choose on average. Distinct clusters of prostate cancer treatment utilities in our sample point to the need for further understanding of subgroups and need for tailored assessment and interventions.

Background: This meta-analysis is an update to a seminal meta-analysis on racial/ethnic disparities in pain treatment in the United States (US) published in 2012. Since then, literature has accumulated on the topic and important policy changes were made., Objective: Examining racial/ethnic disparities in pain management and investigating key moderators of the association between race/ethnicity and pain outcomes in the US., Methods: We performed a systematic search of publications (between January 2011 and February 2021) from the Scopus database. Search terms included: race, racial, racialized, ethnic, ethnicity, minority, minorities, minoritized, pain treatment, pain management, and analgesia. All studies were observational, examining differences in receipt of pain prescription medication in various settings, across racial or ethnic categories in US adult patient populations. Two binary analgesic outcomes were extracted: 1) prescription of "any" analgesia, and 2) prescription of "opioid" analgesia. We analyzed these outcomes in two populations: 1) Black patients, with White patients as a reference; and 2) Hispanic patients, with non-Hispanic White patients as a reference., Results: The meta-analysis included twelve studies, and the systematic review included forty-three studies. Meta-analysis showed that, compared to White patients, Black patients were less likely to receive opioid analgesia (OR 0.83, 95% CI [0.73-0.94]). Compared to non-Hispanic White patients, Hispanic patients were less likely to receive opioid analgesia (OR 0.80, 95% CI [0.72-0.88])., Conclusion: Despite a decade's gap, the findings indicate persistent disparities in prescription of, and access to opioid analgesics for pain among Black and Hispanic populations in the US., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2024 Hirani et al.)

Background: Parents of children in pediatric intensive care units have varied communication experiences with health care professionals. Little is known about factors associated with parents' perceptions of miscommunication., Objective: To examine children's clinical and parents' demographic and psychosocial factors associated with perceptions of miscommunication in the pediatric intensive care unit., Methods: This study was a cross-sectional survey of parents of children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit between January 1, 2018, and February 29, 2020, with a stay of greater than 24 hours., Results: Most of the 200 parent respondents were female (83.4%), White (71.4%), and non-Hispanic (87.9%); median age was 39 years (mean [SD], 40.2 [8.75] years); 17.6% were Black or African American. Among 210 children, mean (SD) age was 6.1 (6.02) years, mean (SD) stay was 4.5 (6.2) days, 38.6% were admitted because of respiratory illness, and the admission was the first for 51.0%. Of the parents, 16.5% reported miscommunication in the pediatric intensive care unit. In multivariable linear regressions, parents' stress (β = 0.286), parents' views of clinician communication (β = -0.400), parents' trust in physicians (β = -0.147), and length of stay (β = 0.122) accounted for 45% of the explained variance in parent-perceived miscommunication (R2 = 0.448, F = 41.19, P < .001)., Conclusions: Parental stress and trust in physician scores were associated with perceived miscommunication. Further research is needed to understand the causes and consequences of miscommunication in order to support hospitalized children and their parents., (©2024 American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.)

Background: Delirium is an acute and fluctuating disturbance of cognition and is a common occurrence in critically ill patients. It is a manifestation of an acute brain dysfunction often attributed to higher survival rates and a subsequently aging population. Intensive Care Unit (ICU) treatment and survival often contributes towards development of delirium, and lack of or inappropriate management can translate into the development of long-term psychological effects that last even after discharge. While a lot is already known about this topic, and several assessment tools exist, these are not being consistently used by ICU nurses and as a result delirium often goes unrecognized, with unwarranted consequences., Aims: The study aimed to explore the perception of delirium among ICU nurses, and the extent of their awareness about guidelines to assess and prevent delirium in ICU patients. It also sought to understand the application of delirium guidelines in ICU practice., Study Design: A quantitative, exploratory, self-reporting survey was conducted among 145 ICU nurses from one critical care unit in the Republic of Ireland., Results: The overall response rate was 71% (103/145). Most nurses (85%) who participated in this survey believed delirium was expected. However, only 45% acknowledged it is a complication. Only 31% of nurses monitored delirium using a validated scale and few observed this as a part of routine care. Most nurses had received education; however, this did not translate to their clinical practice., Conclusions: Guidelines on managing delirium may not be routinely implemented in the ICU settings of hospitals in the Republic of Ireland., Relevance to Clinical Practice: As the findings suggest, a gap exists between theory and practice, necessary revision of policy or creating a new policy, supplemental educational sessions such as bedside sessions, e-learning module, study day or seminars need to be organized to improve nurses' awareness related to delirium and delirium prevention guidelines., (© 2024 The Authors. Nursing in Critical Care published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Critical Care Nurses.)

Background: Hospitalization in the ICU can have long-term physiological and psychological impacts, affecting functional recovery and quality of life of post-ICU patients. Despite systematic reviews showing the impact of music interventions on physiological and psychological outcomes in ICU patients, their applicability and effectiveness in the post-ICU context remain unclear., Aim: This review aimed to summarize: a) the types and characteristics of music/sound of interventions used in the rehabilitation of ICU patients, b) evidence on the feasibility, safety and acceptability of sound and music interventions for post ICU survivors, c) the types of post-ICU outcomes explored and the effects of sound and music interventions on any type of outcome in post-ICU survivors, and d) potential mechanisms or theoretical frameworks underlying the effects of sound and music interventions., Method: We combined current systematic review search methods with a critical narrative approach to synthesize a diverse body of evidence., Results: Results showed that music interventions positively affect the psychological well-being and health outcomes of post-ICU patients. Outcomes included improvements in stress, anxiety, mood, movement, sleep, and pain, despite differences in patient populations and intervention design. No safety concerns were reported. The identified theoretical frameworks described physiological, neurobiological and/or psycho-social pathways as key mediators, however, these mechanisms are not completely understood., Conclusion: Research evidence supports the positive effects of music interventions in post-ICU patients. Further experimental studies are required, especially in adult post-ICU populations to elucidate the characteristics, components, feasibility, and long-term effects of sound/music interventions., Implication to Practice: 1. Music interventions help in post-ICU patients' recovery benefitting stress, anxiety, PTSD, mood, movement, sleep, and pain. 2. Integrating theoretical frameworks into music interventions can expand outcome measures to include physiological markers alongside psychological ones, improving quality of life. 3. Further rigorous interventional studies are required to identify the effectiveness of sound and music interventions in post-ICU patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Cancer survivors including Asian American breast cancer survivors have reported their high needs for help during their survivorship process. With the COVID-19 pandemic, the necessity of technology-based programs to address their needs for help without face-to-face interactions has been highlighted. The purpose of this randomized intervention study was to determine the efficacy of a technology-based program in reducing various types of needs for help among this specific population. This was a randomized clinical trial with repeated measures. A total of 199 participants were included in the data analysis. The recruitment settings included both online and offline communities/groups for Asian Americans. The needs for help were assessed using the Support Care Needs Survey-34 Short Form (SCNS) subscales measuring psychological, information, physical, support, and communication needs. Data analysis was conducted through an intent-to-treat approach. In the mixed effect models, psychological needs, information needs, physical needs, and communication needs decreased over time (P < .001). However, there were no significant group * time effects. Social support significantly mediated the effects of a technology-based intervention on psychological, information, and support needs at the pre-test and the post-1 month. This study supported significant decreases in the needs for help of Asian American breast cancer survivors by a technology-based intervention. Further studies are needed with other racial/ethnic groups of cancer survivors to confirm the efficacy of a technology-based intervention in reducing cancer survivors' needs for help during their survivorship process., (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to American Association for Cancer Education.)

Background: Opioids are a key component of pain management among patients with metastatic cancer pain. However, the evidence base available to guide opioid-related decision-making in individuals with advanced cancer is limited. Patients with advanced cancer or cancer that is unlikely to be cured frequently experience pain. Opioids are a key component of pain management among patients with metastatic cancer pain. Many individuals with advanced cancer are now living long enough to experience opioid-related harm. Emerging evidence from chronic noncancer pain literature suggests that longer-term opioid therapy may have limited benefits for pain and function, and opioid-related harms are also a major concern. However, whether these benefits and harms of opioids apply to patients with cancer-related pain is unknown., Objective: This manuscript outlines the protocol for the "Opioid Therapy for Pain in Individuals With Metastatic Cancer: The Benefits, Harms, and Stakeholder Perspectives (BEST) Study." The study aims to better understand opioid decision-making in patients with advanced cancer, along with opioid benefits and harms, through prospective examination of patients' pain experiences and opioid side effects and understanding the decision-making by patients, care partners, and clinicians., Methods: This is a multicenter, prospective cohort study that aims to enroll 630 patients with advanced cancer, 20 care partners, and 20 clinicians (670 total participants). Patient participants must have an advanced solid cancer diagnosis, defined by the American Cancer Society as cancer that is unlikely to be cured. We will recruit patient participants within 12 weeks after diagnosis so that we can understand opioid benefits, harms, and perspectives on opioid decision-making throughout the course of their advanced cancer (up to 2 years). We will also specifically elicit information regarding long-term opioid use (ie, opioids for ≥90 consecutive days) and exclude patients on long-term opioid therapy before an advanced cancer diagnosis. Lived-experience perspectives related to opioid use in those with advanced cancer will be captured by qualitative interviews with a subset of patients, clinicians, and care partners. Our data collection will be grounded in a behavioral decision research approach that will allow us to develop future interventions to inform opioid-related decision-making for patients with metastatic cancer., Results: Data collection began in October 2022 and is anticipated to end by November 2024., Conclusions: Upon successful execution of our study protocol, we anticipate the development of a comprehensive evidence base on opioid therapy in individuals with advanced cancer guided by the behavioral decision research framework. The information gained from this study will be used to guide interventions to facilitate opioid decisions among patients, clinicians, and care partners. Given the limited evidence base about opioid therapy in people with cancer, we envision this study will have significant real-world implications for cancer-related pain management and opioid-related clinical decision-making., International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/54953., (©Katie Fitzgerald Jones, Gretchen White, Antonia Bennett, Hailey Bulls, Paula Escott, Sarah Orris, Elizabeth Escott, Stacy Fischer, Megan Hamm, Tamar Krishnamurti, Risa Wong, Thomas W LeBlanc, Jane Liebschutz, Salimah Meghani, Cardinale Smith, Jennifer Temel, Christine Ritchie, Jessica S Merlin. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 13.03.2024.)

A culturally tailored virtual program could meet the survivorship needs of Asian American women breast cancer survivors (AABC). This study aims to determine the efficacy of a culturally tailored virtual information and coaching/support program (TICAA) in improving AABC's survivorship experience. A randomized clinical trial (NCT02803593) was conducted from January 2017 to June 2020 among 199 AABC. The intervention group utilized TICAA and the American Cancer Society [ACS] website while the control group used only ACS website for 12 weeks. The outcomes were measured using the SCNS-34SF (needs; primary), the MSAS-SF (symptoms; secondary), and the FACT-B (quality of life; secondary). The data were analyzed using an intent-to-treat approach. The intervention group showed significant reductions in their needs from the baseline (T0) to post 4 weeks (T1) and to post 12 weeks (T2). Although the changes were not statistically significant, the intervention group had decreased symptoms from T0 to T2 while the control group had an increase in their symptoms. The intervention group had a significant increase in their quality of life from T0 to T2. A culturally tailored virtual program could therefore improve quality of life in AABC patients. Trial Registration: To Enhance Breast Cancer Survivorship of Asian Americans (TICAA), NCT02803593, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02803593?titles=TICAA&draw=2&rank=1., (© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.)

Background: Evidence suggests that intensive care unit (ICU) survivors often suffer long-term complications such as post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) from critical illness and ICU stay. PICS and PTSD affect both ICU survivors and their families, which overburdens the healthcare systems. Lack of evidence on the comparative psychometric properties of assessment tools is a major barrier in evidence-based screening for post-ICU symptomatology and health-related quality of life., Objectives: We aimed to identify existing tools for screening PTSD and PICS in ICU survivors and their families and to examine evidence on the validity, reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of existing tools, as reflected in published peer-reviewed studies., Method: A scoping review based on literature searches (CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Health and Psychosocial Instruments, Dissertations and Theses Global, and Google Scholar) and predefined eligibility criteria was conducted according to current scoping review guidelines., Findings: We identified 44 studies reporting on the development and assessment of psychometric properties of PICS/PTSD in ICU survivors or families globally. We identified five tools addressing all three aspects of PICS manifestations, one tool for both physical and mental aspects of PICS, and fivefive tools for quality-of-life assessment in ICU survivors. Altogether, 25 tools assess only one aspect of PICS: five for cognitive impairment, seven for physical impairment, and 13 for mental health impairment and PTSD in ICU survivors. However, only two tools were found for PICS-family assessment. Other findings include (i) unclear validity and often limited feasibility of tools, (ii) low diagnostic accuracy of cognitive assessment tools, and (iii) evidence of appropriate psychometric properties and feasibility of psychological health assessment tools., Conclusion: These results have implications for the selection and implementation of the assessment methods as a means for promoting meaningful patient-centred clinical outcomes to minimise long-term sequelae, reduce the rate of rehospitalisation, and optimise recovery after ICU discharge., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 Australian College of Critical Care Nurses Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Persons with hematologic malignancies have a high symptom burden throughout the illness journey. Coping skills interventions effectively reduce fatigue for other cancer patients. The purpose of this systematic review is to identify if coping interventions can reduce fatigue in patients with hematologic malignancies. Methods: A search of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, APA Psych INFO, Scopus, Cochrane, and non-traditional publications was performed in June 2021 for studies introducing coping interventions for adults with hematological cancers within the past 20 years. The Transactional Model of Stress and Coping was used as a framework with fatigue as the primary outcome. The Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice Appraisal tool was used for quality appraisal. Results: Twelve interventional studies met criteria for inclusion. Four studies significantly reduced fatigue, with an additional 3 showing a reduction in fatigue. Interventions that utilized both problem and emotion-focused coping were more effective at reducing fatigue compared to interventions that only used emotion or problem-focused coping. Conclusion: This systematic review found moderate-strength evidence to support that coping interventions can reduce fatigue, with mixed, but mostly beneficial results. Clinicians caring for patients with hematologic malignancies should consider using coping interventions to reduce fatigue.

Introduction: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a progressive disease of the pulmonary vasculature, which is characterised by premature morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to define the characteristics of PH in the national PH unit (NPHU) in Ireland between 2010 and 2020., Methods: Cases of PH which were referred to the NPHU between 2010 and 2020 were included. PH was defined as a mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥25 mm Hg at right heart catheterisation., Results: Four hundred and fifteen cases of PH were identified during the study period. Group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) accounted for 39% (n=163) of cases, with a calculated annual incidence of 3.11 per million population (95% CI 1.53 to 4.70). The leading PAH subgroup was connective tissue disease-associated PAH (CTD-PAH), which was responsible for 49% of PAH referrals. This was followed by idiopathic PAH, with an estimated annual incidence of 0.63 cases per million population. The mean age at PAH diagnosis was 56±15 years and 86% (n=111) received double-combination or triple-combination therapy within the first 12 months of diagnosis. The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year transplant-free survival for PAH was 89%, 75% and 65%. This was significantly lower for individuals with CTD-PAH relative to other PAH subgroups (p<0.05)., Discussion: This study describes the incidence and outcomes of PH in Ireland. While the outcomes are comparable to other centres, the incidence of PAH and specific subgroups appears low, suggesting that improved disease awareness and case recognition are required. Furthermore, the survival of individuals with CTD-PAH is poor and requires additional exploration., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Caring for patients with serious illness may severely strain clinicians causing distress and probable poor patient outcomes. Unfortunately, clinician distress and its impact historically has received little attention., Research Purpose: The purpose of this article was to investigate the nature of clinician distress., Research Design: Qualitative inductive dimensional analysis., Participants and Research Context: After review of 577 articles from health sciences databases, a total of 33 articles were eligible for analysis., Ethical Considerations: This study did not require ethical review and the authors adhered to appropriate academic standards in their analysis., Findings: A narrative of clinician distress in the hospital clinician in the United States emerged from the analysis. This included clinicians' perceptions and sense of should or the feeling that something is awry in the clinical situation. The explanatory matrix consequence of clinician distress occurred under conditions including: the recognition of conflict , the recognition of emotion , or the recognition of a mismatch ; followed by a process of an inability to feel and act according to one's values due to a precipitating event ., Discussion: This study adds three unique contributions to the concept of clinician distress by (1) including the emotional aspects of caring for seriously ill patients, (2) providing a new framework for understanding clinician distress within the clinician's own perceptions, and (3) looking at action outside of a purely moral lens by dimensionalizing data, thereby pulling apart what has been socially constructed., Conclusion: For clinicians, learning to recognize one's perceptions and emotional reactions is the first step in mitigating distress. There is a critical need to understand the full scope of clinician distress and its impact on the quality of patient-centered care in serious illness.

Aim It is well known that social determinants of health (SDoH) have affected COVID-19 outcomes, but these determinants are broad and complex. Identifying essential determinants is a prerequisite to address widening health disparities during the evolving COVID-19 pandemic. Methods County-specific COVID-19 fatality data from California, Illinois, and New York, three US states with the highest county-cevel COVID-19 fatalities as of June 15, 2020, were analyzed. Twenty-three county-level SDoH, collected from County Health Rankings & Roadmaps (CHRR), were considered. A median split on the population-adjusted COVID-19 fatality rate created an indicator for high or low fatality. The decision tree method, which employs machine learning techniques, analyzed and visualized associations between SDoH and high COVID-19 fatality rate at the county level. Results Of the 23 county-level SDoH considered, population density, residential segregation (between white and non-white populations), and preventable hospitalization rates were key predictors of COVID-19 fatalities. Segregation was an important predictor of COVID-19 fatalities in counties of low population density. The model area under the curve (AUC) was 0.79, with a sensitivity of 74% and specificity of 76%. Conclusion Our findings, using a novel analytical lens, suggest that COVID-19 fatality is high in areas of high population density. While population density correlates to COVID-19 fatality, our study also finds that segregation predicts COVID-19 fatality in less densely populated counties. These findings have implications for COVID-19 resource planning and require appropriate attention., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2022, Li et al.)

Active duty military members have significant service-related risks for developing pain from injury. Although estimates for neuropathic pain (NP) are available for civilian populations, the incidence and prevalence for NP in military members is less clear. Understanding correlates of pain in military members is vital to improving their physical, mental, and social health. Using a comparative design, a secondary analysis was conducted on longitudinal PASTOR data from 190 pain management center patients. The objectives were to compare trends in patient-reported outcomes over time between those screening positive and negative for NP (NP+, NP-, respectively) based on PROMIS Neuropathic Pain Scale T-scores. Findings showed improvements in fatigue, sleep-related impairment, and anger over time. There was a difference between those screening NP+ and NP- for sleep-related impairment, and the cross-level interaction effect showed sleep-related impairment worsening over time. These results emphasize the need to identify NP and implement and evaluate targeted therapies.

Objectives: Patients' experience of psychological distress in the intensive care unit (ICU) is associated with adverse effects, reduced satisfaction, and delayed physical and psychological recovery. There are no specific guidelines for the assessment and management of acute psychological distress during hospitalisation in the ICU. We reviewed existing tools for the assessment of acute psychological distress in ICU patients, examined evidence on their metric properties, and identified potential gaps and methodological considerations., Method: A scoping review based on literature searches (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Excerpta Medica Database, PsycINFO, Scopus, Health and Psychosocial Instruments, Dissertations and Theses Global, and Google Scholar) and predefined eligibility criteria was conducted as per current scoping review guidelines., Findings: Overall, 14 assessment tools were identified having been developed in diverse ICU settings. The identified tools assess mainly anxiety and depressive symptoms and ICU stressors, and investigators have reported various validity and reliability metrics. It was unclear whether available tools can be used in specific groups, such as noncommunicative patients and patients with delirium, brain trauma, stroke, sedation, and cognitive impairments., Conclusion: Available tools have methodological limitations worth considering in future investigations. Given the high prevalence of psychiatric morbidity in ICU survivors, rigorously exploring the metric integrity of available tools used for anxiety, depressive, and psychological distress symptom assessment in the vulnerable ICU population is a practice and research priority., Relevance to Clinical Practice: These results have implications for the selection and implementation of psychological distress assessment methods as a means for promoting meaningful patient-centred clinical outcomes and humanising ICU care experiences., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest There is no conflict of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 Australian College of Critical Care Nurses Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Government of Pakistan is facing difficulty to contain the surge of COVID-19 due to the country's social, political, economical and cultural context. Experiences from the previous epidemic suggest that community perceptions, social norms and cultural practices can impede COVID-19 containment. To understand social responses towards COVID-19, the study aims to explore the understanding of COVID-19 and the acceptance of control measures among community members., Methods: We conducted an exploratory qualitative study using a purposive sampling approach, at two communities of Karachi, Pakistan. In-depth interviews were conducted with community members including, young, middle-aged and older adults of both genders. Study data were analysed manually using the conventional content analysis technique., Results: A total of 27 in-depth virtual interviews were conducted, between May and June 2020. Six overarching themes were identified: (1) community knowledge and perceptions around COVID-19; (2) trusted and preferred sources of health information; (3) initial thoughts and feeling towards COVID-19 pandemic; (4) community practices to prevent exposure from COVID-19; (5) perceived risks associated with poor adherence to infection control practices; and (6) future preparedness of community to avoid the second wave of the outbreak. Generally, community members had good knowledge about COVID-19, and positive behaviour and attitude towards using standard precautions. The knowledge is mainly acquired through electronic, print and social media platforms, which have pros and cons. However, some community members including younger individuals had poor adherence to safety measures. This may necessitate concentrated efforts to raise awareness through community mobilisation and sensitisation activities., Conclusion: This study provides an initial evidence base of communities' perceptions, and attitudes towards COVID-19 in an early stage of pandemic. The study emphasises that sufficient knowledge and awareness about COVID-19, adequate training and drills, and adherence to safety measures, are necessary to better prepare for the second wave of COVID-19., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: The advance in the practice of resuscitation is globally recognised and fully sanctioned in scientific world. However, practicing family presence during resuscitation, also known as witnessed resuscitation, is yet to be endorsed by healthcare professionals. Many professional nursing and physician organisations have endorsed the practice of witnessed resuscitation by issuing guidelines. These organisations support family presence during resuscitation due to the research proving its benefit for patients and families., Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to analyse the concept of witnessed resuscitation., Method: A concept analysis was undertaken using Rodger's (2000) evolutionary method., Findings: The concept analysis suggests that witnessed resuscitation refers to the presence of a family member or relative during a resuscitation procedure, mostly in emergency and complex critical care areas. The defining attributes are family centred care approach, exercising patients and family rights and autonomy in end of life care decisions and involvement of family as active and passive observers during a resuscitation event., Conclusion: Clarity surrounding witnessed resuscitation will guide the development of a conceptual framework, expand nursing knowledge and identify the research required to advance understanding of witnessed resuscitation in practice., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest This is to certify that the author has no conflict of interest and has no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in an increased level of anxiety and fear among the general population related to its management and infection spread. Considering the relevance of present circumstances, we explored perceptions and attitudes of community members towards their mental well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic., Setting: We conducted an exploratory qualitative study using a purposive sampling approach, at two communities of Karachi, Pakistan., Participants: In-depth interviews were conducted with community members including, young adults, middle-aged adults and older adults of both genders. Study data were analysed manually using the thematic analysis technique., Primary Outcome: The primary outcome is assessing community perception towards their mental well-being amidst the COVID-19 pandemic., Results: A total of 27 in-depth interviews were conducted, between May and June 2020. Three overarching themes were identified: (1) impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of the general communities; (2) current coping mechanisms to adapt to the new reality and (3) recommendations to address the mental health of communities. Generally, community members underwent increased anxiety and fear due to the contagious nature of the virus. Alongside, social, financial and religious repercussions of the pandemic have also heightened psychological distress among community members. However, community members were able to point out some of the coping mechanisms such as getting closer to God, connecting with family, participating in mental health sessions and resetting lives by indulging in diverse activities. Simultaneously, they also recommended the need for remote mental health services for elders and continuous efforts by the government to address the mental health needs of the community., Conclusion: COVID-19-associated mental health consequences have hit every individual in society. The study finding has the potential to guide the development of context-specific innovative mental health programmes to overcome the pandemic repercussions., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has certainly resulted in an increased level of anxiety and fear in communities in terms of disease management and infection spread. Due to fear and social stigma linked with COVID-19, many individuals in the community hide their disease and do not access healthcare facilities in a timely manner. In addition, with the widespread use of social media, rumours, myths and inaccurate information about the virus are spreading rapidly, leading to intensified irritability, fearfulness, insomnia, oppositional behaviours and somatic complaints. Considering the relevance of all these factors, we aim to explore the perceptions and attitudes of community members towards COVID-19 and its impact on their daily lives and mental well-being., Methods and Analysis: This formative research will employ an exploratory qualitative research design using semistructured interviews and a purposive sampling approach. The data collection methods for this formative research will include indepth interviews with community members. The study will be conducted in the Karimabad Federal B Area and in the Garden (East and West) community settings in Karachi, Pakistan. The community members of these areas have been selected purposively for the interview. Study data will be analysed thematically using NVivo V.12 Plus software., Ethics and Dissemination: Ethical approval for this study has been obtained from the Aga Khan University Ethical Review Committee (2020-4825-10599). The results of the study will be disseminated to the scientific community and to the research subjects participating in the study. The findings will help us explore the perceptions and attitudes of different community members towards the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on their daily lives and mental well-being., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: Racial and ethnic disparities in pain management are widely documented in the United States. The 2016 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for opioid prescribing have generated new imperatives for using complementary and alternative medicine approaches (CAM) to manage chronic pain, including cancer pain. This review's purpose was to explore the prevalence of CAM use for cancer-related pain among racial and ethnic minorities and to organize these findings according to the CAM modalities proposed by the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)., Design: An integrative review of the literature published between 2007 and 2017., Data Sources: PubMed and SCOPUS databases (2007-2017)., Review/analysis Methods: Articles were included if they engaged in explicit analysis of racial or ethnic differences in CAM use for cancer pain in the outpatient setting, yielding 13 articles for final analysis., Results and Conclusions: Overall, CAM use for any modality ranged from 51% to 83%. Mind-body therapies were reported most, and energy therapies the least. Differences in CAM use were most often attributable to socioeconomic status (SES), with those of higher SES associated with greater use of practitioner-assisted CAM therapies and those of lower SES with greater use of free therapies. This difference has implications for achieving adequate and consistent pain relief among subgroups of patients with cancer. This review also identifies a literature gap regarding racial/ethnic disparities in access to CAM for cancer pain, and a need for validated measures to assess CAM use., (Copyright © 2019 American Society for Pain Management Nursing. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Context: Racial disparities in rates of hospice use, a marker of quality of end-of-life (EOL) care, have been a long-standing problem. Although distrust has been cited as a main reason for the preference of intensive EOL care among African Americans, the role of trust has not been closely analyzed in predicting EOL care in the context of advance care planning (ACP) outcomes., Objectives: The goal of this review was to empirically examine the role of trust in ACP outcomes., Methods: For this systematic review, we utilized methods adapted from the GRADE process developed by the Cochrane Collaboration. The research question guiding this review was "What is the quantitative influence of trust in the health care system or health care providers on the ACP process for African Americans?" We searched Medline, Embase, and Web of Science for articles published between 1975 and 2016., Results: We identified nine quantitative studies that measured and evaluated trust as a predictor or correlate of ACP preferences. Of the studies, eight were observational and one was a pre-post-test study. Three studies were designated as low quality, and six studies were of moderate quality., Conclusion: Distrust has been cited as a central reason for African Americans' tendency to choose life-sustaining treatments over comfort-focused care; however, our findings do not support this hypothesis. The majority of studies found no significant differences in trust between African Americans and their White counterparts. Further, we found that trust was not associated with ACP outcomes in the majority of studies.

Preventing adverse events among chronically ill older adults living in the community is a national health priority. The purpose of this study was to generate distinct risk profiles and compare these profiles in time to: hospitalization, emergency department (ED) visit or death in 371 community-dwelling older adults enrolled in a Medicare demonstration project. Guided by the Behavioral Model of Health Service Use, a secondary analysis was conducted using Latent Class Analysis to generate the risk profiles with Kaplan Meier methodology and log rank statistics to compare risk profiles. The Vuong-Lo-Mendell-Rubin Likelihood Ratio Test demonstrated optimal fit for three risk profiles (High, Medium, and Low Risk). The High Risk profile had significantly shorter time to hospitalization, ED visit, and death (p < 0.001 for each). These findings provide a road map for generating risk profiles that could enable more effective targeting of interventions and be instrumental in reducing health care costs for subgroups of chronically ill community-dwelling older adults., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: It is unknown whether racial/ethnic differences in report of workplace drug testing persist when analyzed within and across various occupations. We sought to examine the association between worker demographics, workplace characteristics, and report of employment in a workplace that performs drug testing., Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of the 2008-2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health examining the relationship between race/ethnicity and report of workplace drug testing among employed, white, black, or Hispanic respondents ≥18 years old. In logistic regression analysis, we adjusted for demographic, occupational, and other relevant variables and performed stratified analyses among three specific occupations., Results: Among 69,163 respondents, 48.2% reported employment in a workplace that performs drug testing. On multivariable analysis, younger age, male sex, black race, income greater than $20,000, completion of high school and non-urban residence were associated with report of drug testing at one's workplace among the full sample as were non-white collar occupation, work in medium or large workplace, and absence of other substance abuse/dependence. In stratified analyses, black race was associated with report of workplace level drug testing among executive/administrative/managerial/financial workers and technicians/related support occupations; Hispanic ethnicity was associated with the outcome among technicians/related support occupations., Conclusions: Racial/ethnic differences in report of workplace drug testing exist within and across various occupations. These differences have important public health implications deserving further study., Scientific Significance: Increased report of drug testing where racial/ethnic minorities work highlights the potential bias that can be introduced when drug testing policies are not implemented in a universal fashion., (© American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry.)

Objective: To systematically review how comorbidities are employed in the empirical literature for adults coping with multiple chronic conditions during common episodes of acute illness that resulted in transition across health care setting., Methods: Evolutionary concept analysis inductively identifies current consensus regarding the usage of a concept and results in exploring attributes and clarification of the concept. Sixty studies from 1965 to 2009 identified from MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, and ISI Web of Science databases were analysed., Results: Comorbidities were used heterogeneously among reviewed studies with most controlling for their presence (n=33) and lacking robust measurement (n=37). The designation of index or principal condition was equally heterogeneous with approximately half (n=26) representing the main disease or diagnosis of interest to the researcher. In this study comorbidities were associated with personal, disease or system level antecedents and consequences. A conceptual framework is proposed., Discussion: The impact of comorbidities on the care and outcomes of adults coping with multiple chronic conditions is limited by heterogeneous and ambiguous usage. While analytic techniques have become more sophisticated, continued lack of meaningful conceptualization and instrument use has limited maturation of this important concept for research, practice and policy purposes.

We report on the implementation of a previously developed clinical pathway for terminally ill patients, Palliative Care for Advanced Disease (PCAD), on a Veterans Administration (VA) acute care oncology unit, comparing processes of care and outcomes for patients on and off the pathway. The PCAD pathway is designed to identify imminently dying patients, review care goals, respect patients' wishes, assess and manage symptoms, address spirituality, and support family members. Retrospective chart reviews from 15 patients who died on PCAD, 14 patients who died on general wards during the same time, and 10 oncology unit patients who died prior to PCAD revealed that PCAD patients were more likely to have documentation of care goals and plans of comfort care (P=0.0001), fewer interventions, and more symptoms assessed (P=0.004), and more symptoms managed according to PCAD guidelines (P=0.02). Implementation of PCAD improved care of dying inpatients by increasing documentation of goals and plans of care, improving symptom assessment and management, and decreasing interventions at the end of life.

Background: Until recently, use of beta-blockers was contraindicated in treatment of patients with congestive heart failure. However, empirical evidence suggests that adding beta-blockers to the standard therapy can slow the progression of heart failure and reduce mortality, including sudden cardiac death., Purpose: To analyze the results of major, prospective, randomized controlled trials on the effects of beta-blockers in congestive heart failure and to provide recommendations for clinical practice and patients' education., Methods: MEDLINE (1989-2001) and biomedical databases (1995-2001) were searched for literature on the use of beta-blockers in patients with congestive heart failure. Information on major randomized controlled trials of at least 6 months' duration with mortality as a major end point were reviewed., Results: Both selective and nonselective beta-blockers significantly reduce mortality due to all causes; decrease need for hospitalization due to cardiovascular causes; and improve patients' New York Heart Association functional classification, hemodynamic status, left ventricular ejection fraction, and signs and symptoms of congestive heartfailure. However, clinical use of beta-blockers remains limited., Conclusion: Strong empirical evidence supports adding beta-blockers to the standard therapy for congestive heart failure. Future efforts should be directed toward establishing the safety and efficacy of beta-blockers in patients with severe heartfailure.