Search

Objective: To describe performance, anxiety, confidence, and time effects across multiple individual simulation experiences in an acute care environment among volunteer Pharm.D. students. Methods: This pilot study used five different cases spanning five weeks. Participants were not aware of case content until each simulation began but topics had been taught in the curriculum. Performance on a SOAP note, self-reported anxiety and confidence, and time to complete each activity were measured. A focus group provided qualitative feedback. Results: Fifteen participants completed the study. Mean performance scores across all cases were variable without a predictable pattern. Global measures of anxiety and confidence numerically improved. The average time to complete simulation activities was similar across the first three cases but decreased for the remaining two cases. Participant comments supported the overall design as meaningful and encouraged self-directed learning. Conclusion: The design of repeated individual simulation experiences improves anxiety and confidence scores and promotes self-directed learning.

Millions travel annually for short-term international service trips (STIST). These trips often involve volunteering with vulnerable children, including those in residential care (ex. orphanages). T...

The management of the drug-drug interaction (DDI) between primidone, a moderate to strong cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 3A4 inducer, and apixaban, a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and CYP3A4 substrate is complex and limited evidence exists to guide management. This case report describes a 65-year-old male, receiving primidone for essential tremor who developed an acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) requiring oral anticoagulation. DOACs are preferred over vitamin K antagonists for acute VTE treatment. Based on patient-specific variables, provider preference, and the avoidance of other DDIs, apixaban was selected. Apixaban’s package insert recommends avoiding use with concomitant strong P-gp and CYP3A4 inducers due to the decreased exposure to apixaban; however, no recommendations are available for drugs that are moderate to strong CYP3A4 inducers and lack P-gp effects. Given that phenobarbital is an active metabolite of primidone, extrapolation of evidence from such literature is theoretical but provides insight into the management of this multi-faceted DDI. In the absence of the ability to monitor plasma apixaban levels, a management strategy of avoidance with a washout period of primidone based on pharmacokinetic parameters was used in this case. Additional evidence is needed to clearly understand the degree of impact and clinical significance of the DDI between apixaban and primidone.

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with diabetes mellitus, as well as the leading diabetes-associated health care cost. The prevalence and associated impact of cardiovascular disease among those with diabetes engenders the need to identify cardiovascular effects of antihyperglycemic agents. This review seeks to evaluate the impact of canagliflozin, a SGLT2 inhibitor, on cardiovascular risk factors and outcomes. The 14 published trials to-date exploring various cardiovascular risk factors and outcomes among patients receiving canagliflozin were identified and included within the review. Overall these studies demonstrate that among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, canagliflozin results in decreased systolic and diastolic blood pressure, lower body weight, and also exhibits renoprotective effects. These findings were similar when canagliflozin was compared to placebo or other antihyperglycemic agents and explored among subsets such as those with chronic kidney disease. In addition, findings from the three trials exploring cardiovascular outcomes of canagliflozin included reduction in cardiovascular mortality and lower incidence of heart failure-associated hospitalizations. Results from studies including other SGLT2 inhibitors suggest that cardiovascular benefits are likely a class-effect found among current SGLT2 inhibitors. Continued research specific to canagliflozin is needed to clarify risks of adverse effects and determine optimal dosing requirements for canagliflozin in regard to cardiovascular risk reduction.

Effective antimicrobial stewardship practices are increasingly essential to best utilize the current arsenal of antimicrobials for the shortest necessary duration to minimize the development of antimicrobial resistance, secondary infections, and health care costs. Monitoring of serum procalcitonin (PCT) levels represents an effective antimicrobial stewardship strategy to differentiate bacterial infections from viral infections and noninfectious inflammatory conditions. Current literature illustrates the merits of PCT monitoring in reducing duration of antibiotic therapy without detrimental effects on mortality or infection relapses. However, the interpretation of PCT levels can be challenging, especially in light of comorbid disease states that can elevate PCT levels. This review sheds light on the utility of PCT monitoring, as well as providing insight into the practical interpretation of PCT levels. Much of the current literature surrounding PCT monitoring consists of use among patients with lower respiratory tract infections or in the critically ill. Overall, studies have demonstrated shorter antibiotic therapy durations when PCT monitoring is utilized. No studies to date have found increased rates of mortality or infection relapses, suggesting that PCT monitoring is not only effective, but also safe when used as a guide for antimicrobial therapy. Nonetheless, many conditions were shown to elevate PCT serum concentrations, even in the absence of bacterial infections, which can make interpretation of PCT concentrations challenging. Two common conditions that affect the accurate interpretation of PCT levels are renal dysfunction and congestive heart failure. Limited studies have been performed in these populations, but current available data propose the need for higher PCT thresholds in those with renal dysfunction or congestive heart failure and support utilizing PCT trends to monitor clinical improvement from bacterial infections. Evidence also suggests that PCT monitoring is cost-effective, as long as the test is ordered judiciously. In summary, PCT monitoring represents a promising antimicrobial stewardship strategy to limit exposure to unnecessary antimicrobial therapy.

Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) experience initial and recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) more commonly and at a younger age than the general population, and it confers a higher mortality for patients with SCD. However, limited evidence is available to guide anticoagulant use for VTE treatment in this population. The primary objective of this study is to characterize the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) and warfarin for VTE treatment among patients with SCD. This single-center retrospective study includes adult patients with SCD who were diagnosed with VTE. Data was obtained from review of electronic health records for the 6 months after VTE diagnosis. Among the 22 patients treated initially with a DOAC, 6 (27%) developed recurrent VTE, none experienced major bleeding, and 3 (14%) experienced clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB). Similarly, of 15 patients initially treated with warfarin, 3 (20%) developed a recurrent VTE, 1 (7%) experienced major bleeding, and 2 (13%) experienced CRNMB. Twelve patients received more than one oral anticoagulant during the study period, most commonly due to a recurrent VTE, concern for non-adherence, or subtherapeutic INR. Overall, the incidence of VTE recurrence and bleeding events were similar between groups, but occurred at a higher rate than those found in major clinical trials of anticoagulant agents. Prescribers should continue to individualize therapeutic decision-making regarding oral anticoagulant therapy for VTE treatment for individuals with SCD based on patient-specific factors and anticipated ability to adhere to the drug regimen or required monitoring.

We thank Dr. Stanton and colleagues for their great work evaluating the clinical outcomes of apixaban in patients with severe renal dysfunction, ultimately concluding apixaban is a reasonable alternative to warfarin.1 One question that clinicians should ask before applying this conclusion to clinical practice is what dose of apixaban should be used? The authors note that patients were primarily receiving apixaban 2.5 mg twice/day but gave no further breakdown based upon indication or level of renal dysfunction. The current FDA labeled dose of apixaban for hemodialysis patients (26.1% of the study population), is 5 mg twice/day (2.5mg twice/day if age ≥80 years or body weight ≤60 kg) for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).1,2 This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.