Search

The role of eye movements in the perception of depth from motion was investigated in esotropia. Elevated motion parallax thresholds have been shown in strabismus [Thompson, A. M., & Nawrot, M. (1999). Abnormal depth perception from motion parallax in amblyopic observers. Vision Research, 39, 1407–1413] suggesting a global deficit in depth perception involving both stereopsis and motion. However, this motion parallax deficit in strabismus might be better explained by the role that eye movements play in motion parallax [Nawrot, M., & Joyce, L. (2006). The pursuit theory of motion parallax. Vision Research, 46, 4709–4725]. Esotropia is associated with asymmetric pursuit and optokinetic response eye movements [Demer, J. L., & von Noorden, G. K. (1988). Optokinetic asymmetry in esotropia. Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, 25, 286–292; Schor, C. M., & Levi, D. M. (1980). Disturbances of small-field horizontal and vertical optokinetic nystagmus in amblyopia. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 19, 851–864; Tychsen, L., & Lisberger, S. G. (1986). Maldevelopment of visual motion processing in humans who had strabismus with onset in infancy. The Journal of Neuroscience, 6, 2495–2508; [Westall, C. A., Eizenman, M., Kraft, S. P., Panton, C. M., Chatterjee, S., & Sigesmund, D. (1998). Cortical binocularity and monocular optokinetic asymmetry in early-onset esotropia. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 39, 1352–1360.]. The first experiment demonstrates that the motion parallax deficit in esotropia mirrors the pursuit eye movement asymmetry: in the direction of normal pursuit, esotropic observers had normal depth from motion parallax. A second set of experiments, conducted in normal observers, demonstrates that this motion parallax deficit is not a secondary problem due to the retinal slip created by inadequate pursuit. These results underscore the role of pursuit eye movements in the perception of depth from motion parallax.

Transsaccadic object file representations were investigated in three experiments. Subjects moved their eyes from a central fixation cross to a location between two peripheral objects. During the saccade, this preview display was replaced with a target display containing a single object to be named. On trials on which the target identity matched one of the preview objects, its orientation either matched or did not match the previewed orientation. The results of Experiments 1 and 2 revealed that orientation changes disrupt perceptual continuity for objects located near fixation, but not for objects located further from fixation. The results of Experiment 3 confirmed that orientation changes do not disrupt continuity for distant objects, while showing that subjects nevertheless maintain an object-specific representation of the orientation of such objects. Together, the results suggest that object files represent orientation but that whether or not orientation plays a role in the processes that determine continuity depends on the quality of the perceptual representation.