Micronutrient malnutrition is one of the most widespread yet largely neglected nutrition challenges faced by women living in the developing world today. An estimated 19 million pregnant women are vitamin A deficient due to poor diets (1), and 500 million women of childbearing age (;40%) are anemic (1, 2). The burden of these and other micronutrient deficiencies, such as zinc, iodine, and vitamin B-12, is particularly high in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa (3). The consequences of micronutrient deficiencies among women are profound and far reaching; they affect not only the health and survival of women but also have long-term, irreversible effects on their offspring. Poor maternal nutrition and health can also jeopardize the ability of women to care for their children, engage in incomegenerating activities, and protect household food security. One of the most important factors responsible for maternal micronutrient deficiency, along with disease burden, is poor diets lacking diversity. Diets of the poor are largely based on cereal or tuber staples and often lack vegetables, fruits, and animal source foods, which are rich in bioavailable micronutrients. Even in households where micronutrient-rich foods are available, inequities in intra-household distribution may prevent women from having access to a high-quality diet (4). Accurate information on women’s diets and micronutrient intakes, however, is extremely scant due primarily to the challenge and cost of collecting and analyzing dietary data. Dietary intake data are timeand resource-intensive to collect and require careful processing and sophisticated analytic methods. The result is that most large data collection efforts, especially those carried out at the national level, have not included dietary intake data. Without data on women’s dietary, and more specifically micronutrient, intake, however, progress in designing, targeting, and evaluating effective programs to improve women’s micronutrient nutrition will continue to be hampered. The Women’s Dietary Diversity Project (WDDP) was designed in 2005 specifically to respond to the need for generating simple yet valid indicators of women’s dietary quality. This collaborative research initiative used existing dietary intake data from 5 resource-poor settings to document women’s diet quality, defined as micronutrient adequacy, and to test whether food group diversity indicators (FGI) could be a useful tool in large-scale nationally representative surveys to predict women’s dietary quality. This journal supplement begins with a review of the literature on women’s micronutrient intakes in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. This is followed by a presentation of empirical research findings from the WDDP initiative. These include results from analyses of 5 datasets on women’s dietary patterns and nutrient intakes from vastly different settings, including both urban/periurban (Burkina Faso, Mali, Philippines) and rural (Bangladesh, Mozambique) areas. The analyses also document the relationship between simple indicators of dietary diversity and the micronutrient adequacy of women’s diets in these settings. Collectively, the results highlight the nature and extent of the gap between women’s micronutrient requirements and their dietary intakes in the 5 areas represented. They also confirm the potential usefulness of simple dietary diversity indicators as a proxy for women’s poor diet quality in these environments. The results are particularly useful for helping focus attention on the critical problem of poor diet quality among women of reproductive age in resource-poor environments. The systematic literature review by Torheim et al. (5) shows a consistent pattern of generally low micronutrient intakes among women in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, regardless of the 1 Published in a supplement to The Journal of Nutrition. Findings of research carried out under the USAID funded Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project’s (FANTA) Women’s Dietary Diversity Project (WDDP). The supplement coordinators for this supplement wereMegan Deitchler, AED, andMarie T. Ruel, International Food Policy Research Institute. Supplement Coordinator disclosures: Megan Deitchler is an employee of AED. Marie T. Ruel declares no conflict of interest. The supplement is the responsibility of the Guest Editor to whom the Editor of The Journal of Nutrition has delegated supervision of both technical conformity to the published regulations of The Journal of Nutrition and general oversight of the scientific merit of each article. The Guest Editor for this supplement was Jennifer Nettleton. Guest Editor disclosure: no conflicts of interest. This publication is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the support of the Office of Health, Infectious Disease, and Nutrition, Bureau for Global Health, United States Agency for International Development (USAID), under terms of Cooperative Agreement No. GHN-A00-08-00001-00, through the Food and Nutritional Technical Assistance II Project (FANTA-2), managed by AED. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. Publication costs for this supplement were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This publication must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and are not attributable to the sponsors or the publisher, Editor, or Editorial Board of The Journal of Nutrition. 2 Author disclosures: M. T. Ruel and M. Arimond, no conflicts of interest. M. Deitchler is an employee of AED. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: m.ruel@cgiar.org. 6 Abbreviations used: FGI, food group diversity indicator; MPA, mean probability of adequacy; NPNL, nonpregnant, nonlactating; WDDP, Women’s Dietary Diversity Project. 7 The Women’s Dietary Diversity Project (WDDP) is a collaboration among researchers from the International Food Policy Research Institute, AED, Fafo Institute for Applied International Studies, FAO, Institute of Research for Development, Iowa State University, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and Wageningen University.