Search

Introduction: With the rising use of immune checkpoint inhibitors ( ICIs ) in oncology, emergency physicians are increasingly confronted with their immune-related adverse events ( irAEs ). We described the types of irAEs presenting to the ED of a Belgian cancer centre and determined associations with the development of an irAE and other patient's characteristics. Secondary objectives describe the therapeutic management and determine 7 and 30-day mortality., Methods: A retrospective chart review of ED visits of patients on ICI from 15 December 2016 to 6 December 2020 was performed. Clinical presentation, cancer characteristics and type of ICI were extracted by a single abstractor. We recorded any suspicion of irAE in the ED and confirmation of an irAE was based on the patient's oncologist report. Outcome was based on mortality at date of last follow-up., Results: 227 patients on ICI presented to the ED, with a total of 451 visits. 54 (12%) of the visits resulted in a diagnosis of irAE. Four clinical features were associated with an irAE: gastrointestinal complaints (p=0.01), skin rashes (p=0.02), acute renal failure (p=0.002) and abnormal liver function (p=0.04). An irAE was also associated with three different factors: a cancer status in remission (OR=5.33, 95% CI 2.57 to 11.04), a combination of two ICIs (OR=4.43, 95% CI 2.09 to 9.42) and a medical history of irAE (OR=2.44, 95% CI 1.27 to 4.68). 30-day mortality was lower in the irAE group (0%) than in the non-irAE group (13%, 95% CI 9% to 19%)., Conclusions: Oncological patients under ICI presenting in the ED are more likely to have an irAE if they present with gastrointestinal and dermatological complaints, acute renal failure and abnormal liver function. This is also true for patients with any history of irAE, a concomitant use of two ICIs and with a cancer status in remission., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: According to meta-analytic data, the prognosis of a cancer patient post-cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is relatively similar to the general population. However, preselection of patients, the details of CPR, patient-specific characteristics, and post-CPR care are poorly described. The aim of this study is to identify prognostic factors in order to recognize cancer patient profiles more likely to benefit from CPR., Methods: This is a retrospective study on a series of patients with solid or hematological malignancies who received CPR between January 2010 and December 2020 in a cancer institute., Results: Sixty-eight patients were included. The ratio of solid to hematological malignancy was 44/24, of which 32 were metastatic solid tumors. Median age was 61 years. Hypoxemia (29%) was the primary factor for cardiac arrest, followed by septic shock (21%). ICU mortality and hospital mortality were 87% and 88% respectively. Younger age, the presence of hematological malignancy, or a metastatic solid tumor were poor predictors for in-hospital mortality. Similarly, cardiac arrest in the ICU, as the final consequence of a pathological process, and a resuscitation time of more than 10 min have a negative influence on prognosis., Conclusions: This study shows that CPR is a useful intervention in cancer patients, even in the elderly patient, especially in non-metastatic solid tumors where cardiac arrest is the consequence of an acute event and not a terminal process., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Primary thoracic cancers affect a large number of patients, mainly those with lung cancer and to a lesser extent those with pleural mesothelioma and thymic tumours. Given their frequency and associated comorbidities, in patients whose mean age is high, these diseases are associated with multiple complications. This article, the last of a series dedicated to emergencies in onco-haematological patients, aims to present a clinical picture of the severe complications (side effects, immune-related adverse events) associated with systemic treatments, excluding infections and respiratory emergencies, with which general practitioners and specialists can be confronted. New toxicities are to be expected with the implementation of innovative therapeutic approaches, such as CAR-T cells, along with immunomodulators and antibody-drug conjugates., (Copyright © 2024 SPLF. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Acute respiratory failure (ARF) remains the most frequent reason for ICU admission in patients who are immunocompromised. This study reports etiologies and outcomes of ARF in subjects with solid tumors., Methods: This study was a post hoc analysis of the EFRAIM study, a prospective multinational cohort study that included 1611 subjects who were immunocompromised and with ARF admitted to the ICU. Subjects with solid tumors admitted to the ICU with ARF were included in the analysis., Results: Among the subjects from the EFRAIM cohort, 529 subjects with solid tumors (32.8%) were included in the analysis. At ICU admission, the median (interquartile range) Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was 5 (3-9). The types of solid tumor were mostly lung cancer ( n = 111, 21%), breast cancer ( n = 52, 9.8%), and digestive cancer ( n = 47, 8.9%). A majority, 379 subjects (71.6%) were full code at ICU admission. The ARF was caused by bacterial or viral infection ( n = 220, 41.6%), extrapulmonary sepsis ( n = 62, 11.7%), or related to cancer or treatment toxicity ( n = 83, 15.7%), or fungal infection ( n = 23, 4.3%). For 63 subjects (11.9%), the ARF etiology remained unknown after an extensive diagnostic workup. The hospital mortality rate was 45.7% ( n = 232/508). Hospital mortality was independently associated with chronic cardiac failure (odds ratio 1.78, 95% CI 1.09-2.92; P = .02), lung cancer (odds ratio 2.50, 95% CI 1.51-4.19; P < .001), day 1 Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (odds ratio 1.97, 95% CI 1.32-2.96; P < .001). ARF etiologies other than infectious, related to cancer, or treatment toxicity were associated with better outcomes (odds ratio 0.32, 95% CI 0.16-0.61; P < .001)., Conclusions: Infectious diseases remained the most frequent cause of ARF in subjects with solid tumors admitted to the ICU. Hospital mortality was related to severity at ICU admission, previous comorbidities, and ARF etiologies related to non-malignant causes or pulmonary embolism. Lung tumor was also independently associated with higher mortality., Competing Interests: The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 by Daedalus Enterprises.)

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the management of cancer. They can induce immune-related adverse events (irAE) leading to intensive care unit (ICU) admission. We aimed to describe irAEs for ICU admissions in solid cancer patients treated with ICIs., Methods: This prospective multicenter study was conducted in France and Belgium. Adult patients with solid tumor and treated with systemic ICIs within the last 6 months, requiring non-programmed ICU admission were included. Patients admitted for microbiologically documented sepsis were excluded. Imputability of irAEs in ICU admissions was described according to the WHO-UMC classification system at ICU admission and at ICU discharge. The use of immunosuppressant treatment was reported., Results: 115 patients were eligible. Solid tumor was mainly lung cancer (n = 76, 66%) and melanoma (n = 18, 16%). They were mainly treated with an anti-PD-(L)1 alone (n = 110, 96%). Main ICU admission reasons were acute respiratory failure (n = 66, 57%), colitis (n = 14, 13%), and cardiovascular disease (n = 13, 11%). ICU admission was considered "likely" associated with irAE for 48% (n = 55) of patients. Factors independently associated with irAE were a good ECOG performance status (PS) (ECOG-PS of 0 or 1 vs. ECOG-PS of 2-3, odds ratio [OR] = 6.34, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.13-18.90, and OR = 3.66, 95% CI 1.33-10.03, respectively), and a history of irAE (OR = 3.28, 95% CI 1.19-9.01). Steroids were prescribed for 41/55 (75%) patients with ICU admission "likely" related to irAE. Three patients were subsequently treated with immunosuppressants., Conclusion: IrAEs accounted for half of ICU admissions in cancer patients receiving ICIs. They could be treated with steroids. Identifying the imputability of irAEs in ICU admissions remains a challenge., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

This European Respiratory Society guideline is dedicated to the provision of good quality recommendations in lung cancer care. All the clinical recommendations contained were based on a comprehensive systematic review and evidence syntheses based on eight PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) questions. The evidence was appraised in compliance with the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. Evidence profiles and the GRADE Evidence to Decision frameworks were used to summarise results and to make the decision-making process transparent. A multidisciplinary Task Force panel of lung cancer experts formulated and consented the clinical recommendations following thorough discussions of the systematic review results. In particular, we have made recommendations relating to the following quality improvement measures deemed applicable to routine lung cancer care: 1) avoidance of delay in the diagnostic and therapeutic period, 2) integration of multidisciplinary teams and multidisciplinary consultations, 3) implementation of and adherence to lung cancer guidelines, 4) benefit of higher institutional/individual volume and advanced specialisation in lung cancer surgery and other procedures, 5) need for pathological confirmation of lesions in patients with pulmonary lesions and suspected lung cancer, and histological subtyping and molecular characterisation for actionable targets or response to treatment of confirmed lung cancers, 6) added value of early integration of palliative care teams or specialists, 7) advantage of integrating specific quality improvement measures, and 8) benefit of using patient decision tools. These recommendations should be reconsidered and updated, as appropriate, as new evidence becomes available., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: T.G. Blum reports an unrestricted grant from Stiftung Oskar-Helene-Heim (Berlin, Germany), through which staff support for the work of the current Task Force was provided. R.L. Morgan declares no competing interests. V. Durieux declares no competing interests. J. Chorostowska-Wynimko declares grants to the National Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases from Pfizer and to the Polish Respiratory Society from AstraZeneca; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Amgen, Takeda, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche and Roche Diagnostica; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, CelonPharma, Amgen, Takeda, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche, Roche Diagnostica and Amoy; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer and Amgen; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Takeda, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche and Roche Diagnostica, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission; and is Secretary General of the European Respiratory Society and a member of the Executive Committees of the Polish Respiratory Society and the Polish Coalition for Personalized Medicine. D.R. Baldwin declares payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Roche and Merck Sharp & Dohme, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission. J. Boyd is an employee of the European Lung Foundation. C. Faivre-Finn reports research grants from AstraZeneca and Elekta; payment or honoraria for presentations from AstraZeneca; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Elekta and AstraZeneca; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AstraZeneca and Merck Sharp & Dohme, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission. F. Galateau-Salle declares no competing interests. F. Gamarra declares no competing interests. B. Grigoriu declares support for attending meetings and/or travel from Roche and AstraZeneca; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AstraZeneca, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission. G. Hardavella declares no competing interests. M. Hauptmann declares no competing interests. E. Jakobsen declares no competing interests. D. Jovanovic declares payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, WCBIP 2020 and AstraZeneca; payment for expert testimony relating to the health effects of air pollution from SO2 released by Serbia Zijin Copper mining and smelting complex and the two biggest Serbian power plants, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission; and is a member of the editorial boards of the Journal of Thoracic Disease and the AME Surgical Journal, and a committee member of the National Ecological Association (NEA), Serbia. P. Knaut declares no competing interests. G. Massard declares a speaker's fee from Pneumo Update Europe, in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission. J. McPhelim declares advisory board payments from AstraZeneca, Janssen-Cilag and Bristol Myers Squibb, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission. A-P. Meert declares no competing interests. R. Milroy declares no competing interests. R. Muhr declares no competing interests. L. Mutti declares no competing interests. M. Paesmans declares no competing interests. P. Powell is an employee of the European Lung Foundation. P.M. Putora declares research grants to their institution from AstraZeneca, Takeda and Bayer; and a speaker's fee from Janssen-Cilag, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission. J. Rawlinson declares travel/accommodation support from the BTOG to attend the annual meeting in Dublin as patient advocate/steering committee member; travel/accommodation support from the European Respiratory Society to attend a screening meeting in Barcelona (patient representative) and European Lung Foundation patient event at the European Respiratory Society Congress Madrid 2019; travel/accommodation support from the NCRI to attend a conference in Glasgow (consumer member); travel/accommodation support from the EORTC to attend the Patient Days event as a speaker and patient panel member; and has been a Non-Executive Director (lay member) at Sandwell and West Birmingham Clinical Commissioning Group, UK. A.L. Rich declares no competing interests. D. Rigau is a methodologist for the European Respiratory Society. D. de Ruysscher declares grants to their institution from AstraZeneca and BeiGene; payment to their institution for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca; and payment to their institution for participation on an advisory board from AstraZeneca, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission. J-P. Sculier declares no competing interests. A. Schepereel declares a research grant to their institution from Bristol Myers Squibb; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb and Leo Pharma; support for attending meetings and/or travel from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Roche; and payment for participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb and Merck Sharp & Dohme, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission. D. Subotic declares no competing interests. P. Van Schil declares consulting fees paid to their institution by AstraZeneca and Merck Sharp & Dohme; payment to their institution for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca; and travel expenses related to participation in data safety monitoring or advisory boards for the LungART Trial and the Pearls Trial, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission; and is the President-elect of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Treasurer of the Belgian Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. T. Tonia is a methodologist for the European Respiratory Society. C. Williams is an employee of the European Lung Foundation. T. Berghmans declares consulting fees from InhaTarget; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Janssen; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Janssen and Roche, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission., (Copyright ©The authors 2023. For reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org.)

Coagulation disorders increase mortality rate during septic shock, but the impact of concomitant hematological malignancies remains unknown. The study assessed coagulation disorders in onco-hematological patients with thrombocytopenia (<100 G/L) admitted to ICU for septic shock. Among 146 included patients, 50 patients had lymphoma and 49 patients had acute leukemia. ICU mortality rate was 43.8% ( n  = 64). Median increase in prothrombin time (PT) at day(d) 1 was 4.7 s (IQR 3.2-7.9) in ICU survivors vs. 6.4 s (IQR 4.5-13.7; p < 0.01 ) in non-survivors. Fibrinogen kinetics (increase in fibrinogen levels between d1 and d2) was +0.55 (-0.22-1.55) vs. +0.10 g/L (-0.40-0.50; p = 0.03 ) in surviving and non-surviving patients, respectively. PT increase ≥6 s at d1 (OR 5.5; 95% CI 1.1-6.0; p = 0.03 ) and mechanical ventilation (OR 7.4; 95% CI 3.3-17.7; p < 0.001 ) were independently associated with ICU mortality. This study provides information and new ways to identify hematological patients with high-risk mortality.

Optic neuritis with CRMP-5 IgG is a paraneoplastic inflammation of the optic nerve associated with lung cancer, mostly small-cell lung cancer. We present the case of a patient with lung adenocarcinoma who developed progressive bilateral visual loss a few months after immune-chemotherapy with pembrolizumab and after Covid-19 vaccination. Positive CRMP-5 IgG were detected in blood sample and complete work-up - including brain MRI - did not show any progression. High dose systemic corticoids were administered with transient improving, followed by intravenous immunoglobulins, methotrexate and rituximab but despite negativization of CRMP-5 IgG, the patient had a progressive visual loss., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest AG: no conflict of interest. MB: travel grant from Roche/GNE and Sanofi, speaker honorarium from Roche/GNE and Janssen (to my institution). AO: no conflict of interest. DE: no conflict of interest. TD: no conflict of interest. NG: no conflict of interest. TB: no conflict of interest. APM: grant from BMS outside the submitted work., (Copyright © 2022 SPLF and Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To study prevalence of targeted therapy (TT)-related adverse events requiring ICU admission in solid tumor patients., Methods: Retrospective multicenter study from the Nine-i research group. Adult patients who received TT for solid tumor within 3 months prior to ICU admission were included. Patients admitted for TT-related adverse event were compared to those admitted for other reasons., Results: In total, 140 patients, median age of 63 (52-69) years were included. Primary cancer site was mostly digestive (n=27, 19%), kidney (n=27, 19%), breast (n=24, 17%), and lung (n=20, 14%). Targeted therapy was anti-VEGF/VEGFR for 27% (n=38) patients, anti-EGFR for 22% (n=31) patients, anti-HER2 for 14% (n=20) patients and anti-BRAF for 9% (n=5) patients. ICU admission was related to TT adverse events for 30 (21%) patients. The most frequent complications were interstitial pneumonia (n=7), cardiac failure (n=5), anaphylaxis (n=4) and bleeding (n=4). At ICU admission, no significant difference was found between patients admitted for a TT-related adverse event and the other patients. One-month survival rate was higher in patients admitted for TT adverse event (OR=5.733 [2.031-16.182] P<0.001)., Conclusions: Adverse events related to targeted therapy accounted for 20% of ICU admission in our population and carried a 16% one-month mortality. Outcome was associated with admission for TT related to adverse event, breast cancer and good performance status., (Copyright © 2022 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Control of transmissible diseases as COVID-19 needs a testing and an isolation strategy. The PARIS score developed by Torjdman et al. was aimed at improving patient selection for testing and quarantining but was derived from a general population. We performed a retrospective analysis of the validity of the PARIS score in a cancer patient population. We included 164 patients counting for 181 visits at the emergency department of the Jules Bordet Institute between March 10th and May 18th which had a SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test at admission. Twenty-six cases (14.3%) were tested positive with a higher proportion of positive tests among hematological patients compared to those with solid tumors (26% vs 11% p = 0.02). No clinical symptoms were associated with a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR. No association between anticancer treatment and SARS-CoV-2 infection was found. The PARIS score failed to differentiate SARS-CoV-2-positive and SARS-CoV-2-negative groups (AUC 0.61 95% CI 0.48-0.73). The negative predictive value of a low probability PARIS score was 0.89 but this concerned only 11% of the patients. A high probability PARIS score concerned 49% patients but the positive predictive value was 0.18. CT scan had a sensitivity of 0.77, specificity 0.51, a positive predictive value of 0.24, and a negative predictive value of 0.92. The performance of the PARIS score is thus very poor in this cancer population. A low-risk score can be of some utility but this concerns a minority of patients., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: The characteristics and outcomes of adult patients with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection who require ICU admission are poorly defined. Although several studies in adults with RSV infection have been published in recent years, they did not focus specifically on patients with critical illness., Research Question: What are the characteristics and outcomes of adult patients in the ICU with RSV infection and how do they compare with those of patients in the ICU with influenza infection?, Study Design and Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study in France and Belgium (17 sites) compared the characteristics and outcomes of adult patients in the ICU with RSV infection vs those with influenza infection between November 2011 and April 2018. Each patient with RSV infection was matched by institution and date of diagnosis with a patient with influenza infection. In-hospital mortality was compared between the two groups, with adjustment for prognostic factors in a multivariate model (sex, age, main underlying conditions, and concurrent bloodstream infection)., Results: Data from 618 patients (309 with RSV infection and 309 with influenza infection) were analyzed. Patients with RSV infection were significantly more likely to have an underlying chronic respiratory condition (60.2% vs 40.1%; P < .001) and to be immunocompromised (35% vs 26.2%; P = .02) than patients with influenza infection. Several differences in clinical signs and biological data at diagnosis were found between the groups. In-hospital mortality was not significantly different between the two groups (23.9% in the RSV group vs 25.6% in the influenza group; P = .63), even after adjustment for prognostic factors in a multivariate model., Interpretation: Adult patients in the ICU with RSV infection differ from adult patients in the ICU with influenza in terms of comorbidities and characteristics at diagnosis. RSV infection was associated with high in-hospital mortality, approaching 25%. In multivariate analysis, RSV infection was associated with a similar odds of in-hospital death compared with influenza infection., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The purpose of our study is to evaluate the characteristics of patients whose medical anti-cancer treatment has been initiated at the ICU and to release prognostic factors for hospital mortality in these patients., Material and Methods: We analyzed retrospectively all the records of cancer patients admitted between 01/01/2007 and 31/12/2017 in our ICU and for whom a new anti-cancer medical treatment was initiated during their ICU stay., Results: Our study includes 147 patients, 78 men (53%) and 69 women (47%), with a median age of 58 years. Eighty patients (54%) had a solid tumor and 67 (46%) a hematological malignancy. ICU mortality was 23% and hospital mortality 32%. The poor prognostic factors for hospital mortality were: higher SOFA, higher Charslon comorbidity index and the presence of a therapeutic limitation (introduced at the time of admission or within 24 hours of admission to the ICU). One-year survival for patients who survived hospital stay was 37% (17% for those with a solid tumor and 61% for the ones with a hematological malignancy)., Conclusion: Initiation of an anti-cancer medical treatment is feasible and can lead to good 1 year survival rate, especially for those with a hematological tumor.

Lung (bronchial) cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in Western countries today. Thoracic surgery represents a major therapeutic strategy and the various advances made in recent years have made it possible to develop less and less invasive techniques. That said, the postoperative period may be lengthy, post-surgical approaches need to be more precisely codified, and it matters that the different interventions involved be supported by sound scientific evidence. To date, however, there exists no evidence that preventive postoperative admission to intensive care is beneficial for patients having undergone lung resection surgery without immediate complications. A stratification of the risk of complications taking into consideration the patient's general state of health (e.g., nutritional status, degree of autonomy, etc.), comorbidities and type of surgery could be a useful predictive tool regarding the need for postoperative intensive care. However, serious post-operative complications remain relatively frequent and post-operative management of these intensive care patients is liable to become complex and long-lasting. In the aftermath of the validation of "enhanced recovery after surgery" (ERAS) in thoracic surgery, new protocols are needed to optimize management of patients having undergone pulmonary resection. This article focuses on the main postoperative complications and more broadly on intensive care patient management following thoracic surgery., (Copyright © 2021 SPLF. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Immunocompromised cancer patients are presumed to be at high risk of developing COVID-19 infection. Predisposing factors to contracting COVID-19 and to severe outcomes have been described in registries but were not compared between solid tumors and hematological malignancies., Method: This retrospective single oncologic center study included adults with solid tumors or hematological malignancies referred to testing by naso-pharyngeal swab for a SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR from March 10 to May 18, 2020., Results: A total of 212 patients were included in the study. Forty-five (21%) were tested positive with SARS-CoV-2. The univariate analysis with positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR as a dependent variable reveals significant odds ratios (ORs) for age-with a mean of 62.5 years-(OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.02-1.08), performance status ≥2 (OR: 2.38, 95% CI: 1.22-4.70), inpatient status (OR: 2.36, 95%CI: 1.11-4.91), and hematological malignancies (OR: 2.48, 95% CI: 1.23-4.96). In contrast, OR for solid tumors reveals a negative association (OR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.20-0.81). When integrating severe outcome (ICU admission or COVID-19-related death) as a dependent variable, the univariate logistic regression model shows significant ORs for pre-existing lymphopenia (OR: 4.0, 95% CI: 1.17-15.04), hematological malignancies (OR: 3.73, 95% CI: 1.09-13.80), and a negative association for solid tumors (OR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.07-0.92)., Conclusion: In patients referred for SARS-CoV-2 testing, hematological malignancies were associated with a higher risk of COVID-19 infection and severe outcomes. Other factors were age and inpatient status., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

To respond to the legitimate questions raised by the application of invasive methods of monitoring and life-support techniques in cancer patients admitted in the ICU, the European Lung Cancer Working Party and the Groupe de Recherche Respiratoire en Réanimation Onco-Hématologique, set up a consensus conference. The methodology involved a systematic literature review, experts' opinion and a final consensus conference about nine predefined questions1. Which triage criteria, in terms of complications and considering the underlying neoplastic disease and possible therapeutic limitations, should be used to guide admission of cancer patient to intensive care units?2. Which ventilatory support [High Flow Oxygenation, Non-invasive Ventilation (NIV), Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (IMV), Extra-Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)] should be used, for which complications and in which environment?3. Which support should be used for extra-renal purification, in which conditions and environment?4. Which haemodynamic support should be used, for which complications, and in which environment?5. Which benefit of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in cancer patients and for which complications?6. Which intensive monitoring in the context of oncologic treatment (surgery, anti-cancer treatment …)?7. What specific considerations should be taken into account in the intensive care unit?8. Based on which criteria, in terms of benefit and complications and taking into account the neoplastic disease, patients hospitalized in an intensive care unit (or equivalent) should receive cellular elements derived from the blood (red blood cells, white blood cells and platelets)?9. Which training is required for critical care doctors in charge of cancer patients?, (© 2021. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Whether Intensive Care Unit (ICU) clinicians display unconscious bias towards cancer patients is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of critically ill patients with and without perceptions of excessive care (PECs) by ICU clinicians in patients with and without cancer., Methods: This study is a sub-analysis of the large multicentre DISPROPRICUS study. Clinicians of 56 ICUs in Europe and the United States completed a daily questionnaire about the appropriateness of care during a 28-day period. We compared the cumulative incidence of patients with concordant PECs, treatment limitation decisions (TLDs) and death between patients with uncontrolled and controlled cancer, and patients without cancer., Results: Of the 1641 patients, 117 (7.1%) had uncontrolled cancer and 270 (16.4%) had controlled cancer. The cumulative incidence of concordant PECs in patients with uncontrolled and controlled cancer versus patients without cancer was 20.5%, 8.1%, and 9.1% (p < 0.001 and p = 0.62, respectively). In patients with concordant PECs, we found no evidence for a difference in time from admission until death (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.60-1.72 and HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.49-1.54) and TLDs (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.33-1.99 and HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.27-1.81) across subgroups. In patients without concordant PECs, we found differences between the time from admission until death (HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.58-3.15 and 1.66, 95% CI 1.28-2.15), without a corresponding increase in time until TLDs (NA, p = 0.3 and 0.7) across subgroups., Conclusions: The absence of a difference in time from admission until TLDs and death in patients with concordant PECs makes bias by ICU clinicians towards cancer patients unlikely. However, the differences between the time from admission until death, without a corresponding increase in time until TLDs, suggest prognostic unawareness, uncertainty or optimism in ICU clinicians who did not provide PECs, more specifically in patients with uncontrolled cancer. This study highlights the need to improve intra- and interdisciplinary ethical reflection and subsequent decision-making at the ICU., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Introduction: There are about 60,000 diagnoses of cancer per year in Belgium. After hospital care, about 12-13% of cancer patients are readmitted within 30 days after discharge. These readmissions are partly related to drug-related problems (DRP), such as interactions or adverse drug effects (ADE)., Objectives: The aim of this study is to quantify and to classify DRP readmissions within 30 days for cancer patients and to highlight risk factors potentially correlated to readmissions., Methods: This study is a 6-month observational retrospective study in two care facilities in Brussels: an academic general hospital and an academic oncology center. Patients readmitted within 30 days after their last hospital care for a potential DRP were included. Patient files were evaluated with an intermediate medication review that included interactions analysis (Lexicomp®). The probability of DRP readmission was assessed using the World Health Organization's Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) system., Results: The final population included 299 patients; among them, 123 (41.1%) were readmitted due to DRP (certain DRP (4.9%), probable DRP (49.6%), and possible DRP (45.5%)). Risks factors linked to these DRP were a low Charlson Comorbidity Index, polypharmacy, the kind of hospital, and some chemotherapies (platinum preparations). Among all readmitted patients, the D-type interactions were the most common (44.8%), which suggest a possible therapy modification. However, around 10% of interactions were X-type (drug combination to avoid)., Conclusion: Almost 10% of patient readmitted within 30 days were potentially related to a DRP, most of them from adverse drug effects. Four risk factors (low Charlson Comorbidity Index, polypharmacy, the hospital, and some chemotherapies) were highlighted to prevent these readmissions.

Objectives: Early intensive care unit (ICU) admission, in Critically Ill Cancer Patients (CICP), is believed to have contributed to the prognostic improvement of critically ill cancer patients. The primary objective of this study was to assess the association between early ICU admission and hospital mortality in CICP., Design: Retrospective analysis of a prospective multicenter dataset. Early admission was defined as admission in the ICU < 24 h of hospital admission. We assessed the association between early ICU admission and hospital mortality in CICP via survival analysis and propensity score matching., Results: Of the 1011patients in our cohort, 1005 had data available regarding ICU admission timing and were included. Overall, early ICU admission occurred in 455 patients (45.3%). Crude hospital mortality in patients with early and delayed ICU admission was 33.6% (n = 153) vs. 43.1% (n = 237), respectively (P = 0.02). After adjustment for confounders, early compared to late ICU admission was not associated with hospital mortality (HR 0.92; 95%CI 0.76-1.11). After propensity score matching, hospital mortality did not differ between patients with early (35.2%) and late (40.6%) ICU admission (P = 0.13). In the matched cohort, early ICU admission was not associated with mortality after adjustment on SOFA score (HR 0.89; 95%CI 0.71-1.12). Similar results were obtained after adjustment for center effect., Conclusion: In this cohort, early ICU admission was not associated with a better outcome after adjustment for confounder and center effect. The uncertainty with regard to the beneficial effect of early ICU on hospital mortality suggests the need for an interventional study., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Hyperbilirubinemia is frequent in patients with hematological malignancies admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Literature about hepatic dysfunction (HD) in this context is scarce., Methods: We investigated the prognostic impact of HD analyzing a prospective multicenter cohort of 893 critically ill hematology patients. Two groups were defined: patients with HD (total bilirubin ≥33 μmol/L at ICU admission) and patients without HD., Results: Twenty one percent of patients were found to have HD at ICU admission. Cyclosporine, antimicrobials before ICU admission, abdominal symptoms, ascites, history of liver disease, neutropenia, increased serum creatinine and myeloma were independently associated with HD. Etiology remained undetermined in 73% of patients. Hospital mortality was 56.3% and 36.3% respectively in patients with and without HD (p < 0.0001). Prognostic factors independently associated with hospital mortality in HD group were, performance status >1 (OR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.49-2.87, p < 0.0001), invasive mechanical ventilation (OR = 3.92, 95% CI = 2.69-5.71, p < 0.0001), renal replacement therapy (OR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.22-2.47, p = 0.002), vasoactive drug (OR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.21-2.71, p = 0.004) and SOFA score without bilirubin level at ICU admission (OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.04-1.14, p < 0.0001)., Conclusions: HD is common, underestimated, infrequently investigated, and is associated with impaired outcome in critically ill hematology patients. HD should be considered upon ICU admission and managed as other organ dysfunctions., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: In 2016, a new definition of sepsis and septic shock was adopted. Some studies based on the general population demonstrated that the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is more accurate than the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria to predict hospital mortality of infected patients requiring intensive care., Patients and Method: We have analyzed all the records of patients with cancer admitted for a suspected infection between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2016, in our oncological intensive care unit (ICU). Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and quick SOFA (qSOFA) score as well as SIRS criteria were calculated. We analyzed the accuracy of each score to predict hospital mortality in the setting of the new and old definitions of septic shock., Results: Our study includes 241 patients with a solid tumor and 112 with a hematological malignancy. The hospital mortality rate is 37% (68% in patients with septic shock according to the new definition and 60% according to old definition) between 2013 and 2016. To predict hospital mortality, the SOFA score has an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.79), the qSOFA of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.59-0.70), and the SIRS criteria of 0.58 (95% CI, 0.52-0.63). In multivariate analysis, a higher SOFA score or a higher qSOFA score indicates poor prognosis: odds ratio (OR) per 1-point increase by 1.28 (95% CI, 1.18-1.39) and 1.48 (95% CI, 1.04-2.11), respectively. Complete remission is a good prognostic factor for hospital mortality: OR 0.39 (95% CI, 0.22-0.67)., Conclusion: The new definition of sepsis and septic shock is applicable in an ICU oncological population with the same reliability as in the general population. The SOFA score is more accurate than qSOFA and SIRS criteria to predict hospital mortality.

Introduction: Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is considered standard therapeutic management in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). This is based on old randomised trials with methodological limitations, namely the absence of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain. The aim of this study is to assess the risk not administering PCI when systematic brain imaging is applied., Methods: Retrospective study including untreated SCLC, without PCI and receiving brain imaging at the time of diagnosis. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank statistics were used for survival analyses., Results: Among 150 patients, 75 were possibly eligible for PCI. Thirteen patients presented with an isolated brain recurrence as the first site of progression with no other metastatic sites apparent, and in 6 patients, the brain was the only recurrent site during the whole follow-up. In the group of patients eligible for PCI, there was no statistically significant survival difference according to the brain progression status (P=0.11)., Conclusions: The expected impact of PCI seems limited in terms of overall survival and prevention of isolated brain metastases in patients having systematic brain imaging during SCLC work-up., (Copyright © 2021 SPLF. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Delayed intubation is associated with high mortality. There is a lack of objective criteria to decide the time of intubation. We assessed a recently described combined oxygenation index (ROX index) to predict intubation in immunocompromised patients. The study is a secondary analysis of randomized trials in immunocompromised patients, including all patients who received high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC). The first objective was to evaluate the accuracy of the ROX index to predict intubation for patients with acute respiratory failure., Results: In the study, 302 patients received HFNC. Acute respiratory failure was mostly related to pneumonia (n = 150, 49.7%). Within 2 (1-3) days, 115 (38.1%) patients were intubated. The ICU mortality rate was 27.4% (n = 83). At 6 h, the ROX index was lower for patients who needed intubation compared with those who did not [4.79 (3.69-7.01) vs. 6.10 (4.48-8.68), p < 0.001]. The accuracy of the ROX index to predict intubation was poor [AUC = 0.623 (0.557-0.689)], with low performance using the threshold previously found (4.88). In multivariate analysis, a higher ROX index was still independently associated with a lower intubation rate (OR = 0.89 [0.82-0.96], p = 0.04)., Conclusion: A ROX index greater than 4.88 appears to have a poor ability to predict intubation in immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure, although it remains highly associated with the risk of intubation and may be useful to stratify such risk in future studies.

Patients with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) who develop acute respiratory failure (ARF) are perceived to have worse outcomes than autologous HCT recipients and non-transplant patients with hematologic malignancy (HM). Within a large international prospective cohort, we evaluated clinical outcomes in these 3 populations. We conducted a secondary analysis of the EFRAIM study, a multicenter observational study of immunocompromised adults with ARF admitted to 62 intensive care units (ICUs) in 16 countries. We described characteristics and compared outcomes of patients with HM who did not undergo transplantation and patients who underwent autologous or allogeneic HCT using multivariable logistic regression and propensity score-matched analyses. A total of 801 patients were included: 570 who did not undergo transplantation, 86 autologous HCT recipients and 145 allogeneic HCT recipients. Acute myelogenous leukemia (171 of 570; 30%) was the most common HM and most common indication for allogeneic HCT (76 of 145; 52%). Compared with the patients who did not undergo HCT and autologous HCT recipients, allogeneic HCT recipients were younger, had fewer comorbid conditions, and were more likely to undergo diagnostic bronchoscopy in the ICU. Unadjusted ICU and hospital mortality were 35% and 45%, respectively, across the entire cohort. In multivariable regression analysis, autologous HCT (odds ratio [OR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], .57 to 2.03; P = .82) and allogeneic HCT (OR, .99; 95% CI, .60 to 1.66; P = .98) were not associated with higher hospital mortality compared with the no-HCT cohort, adjusting for demographic, functional, clinical, malignancy, and ARF characteristics. The results were similar when analyzed using propensity score-matching techniques. Our findings indicate that autologous and allogeneic HCT recipients who develop ARF and require ICU admission have similar hospital mortality as patients with HM not treated with HCT., (Copyright © 2020 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To assess the response to initial oxygenation strategy according to clinical variables available at admission., Design: Multicenter cohort study., Setting: Thirty French and Belgium medical ICU., Subjects: Immunocompromised patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure., Interventions: None., Measurements and Main Results: Data were extracted from the Groupe de Recherche en Reanimation Respiratoire du patient d'Onco-Hématologie database. Need for invasive mechanical ventilation was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoint was day-28 mortality. Six-hundred forty-nine patients were included. First oxygenation strategies included standard oxygen (n = 245, 38%), noninvasive ventilation (n = 285; 44%), high-flow nasal cannula oxygen (n = 55; 8%), and noninvasive ventilation + high-flow nasal cannula oxygen (n = 64; 10%). Bilateral alveolar pattern (odds ratio = 1.67 [1.03-2.69]; p = 0.04), bacterial (odds ratio = 1.98 [1.07-3.65]; p = 0.03) or opportunistic infection (odds ratio = 4.75 [2.23-10.1]; p < 0.001), noninvasive ventilation use (odds ratio = 2.85 [1.73-4.70]; p < 0.001), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (odds ratio = 1.19 [1.10-1.28]; p < 0.001), and ratio of PaO2 and FIO2 less than 100 at ICU admission (odds ratio = 1.96 [1.27-3.02]; p = 0.0002) were independently associated with intubation rate. Day-28 mortality was independently associated with bacterial (odds ratio = 2.34 [1.10-4.97]; p = 0.03) or opportunistic infection (odds ratio = 4.96 [2.11-11.6]; p < 0.001), noninvasive ventilation use (odds ratio = 2.35 [1.35-4.09]; p = 0.003), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (odds ratio = 1.19 [1.10-1.28]; p < 0.001), and ratio of PaO2 and FIO2 less than 100 at ICU admission (odds ratio = 1.97 [1.26-3.09]; p = 0.003). High-flow nasal cannula oxygen use was neither associated with intubation nor mortality rates., Conclusions: Some clinical characteristics at ICU admission including etiology and severity of acute respiratory failure enable to identify patients at high risk for intubation.

Objectives: Cancer affects up to 20% of critically ill patients, and sepsis is one of the leading reasons for ICU admission in this setting. Early signals suggested that survival might be increasing in this population. However, confirmation studies have been lacking. The goal of this study was to assess trends in survival rates over time in cancer patients admitted to the ICU for sepsis or septic shock over the last 2 decades., Data Source: Seven European ICUs., Study Selection: A hierarchical model taking into account the year of admission and the source dataset as random variables was used to identify risk factors for day 30 mortality., Data Extraction: Data from cancer patients admitted to ICUs for sepsis or septic shock were extracted from the Groupe de Recherche Respiratoire en Réanimation Onco-Hématologique database (1994-2015)., Data Synthesis: Overall, 2,062 patients (62% men, median [interquartile range] age 59 yr [48-67 yr]) were included in the study. Underlying malignancies were solid tumors (n = 362; 17.6%) or hematologic malignancies (n = 1,700; 82.4%), including acute leukemia (n = 591; 28.7%), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 461; 22.3%), and myeloma (n = 244; 11.8%). Two-hundred fifty patients (12%) underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and 640 (31.0%) were neutropenic at ICU admission. Day 30 mortality was 39.9% (823 deaths). The year of ICU admission was associated with significant decrease in day 30 mortality over time (odds ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.98; p = 0.001). Mechanical ventilation (odds ratio, 3.25; 95% CI, 2.52-4.19; p < 0.01) and vasopressors use (odds ratio, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.10-1.83; p < 0.01) were independently associated with day 30 mortality, whereas underlying malignancy, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and neutropenia were not., Conclusions: Survival in critically ill oncology and hematology patients with sepsis improved significantly over time. As outcomes improve, clinicians should consider updating admission policies and goals of care in this population.

Immunotherapy is an important armamentarium for cancer treatment nowadays. Apart from their significant effectiveness in controlling disease they also generate potential severe immune related adverse effects. Preexistence of immune related conditions may eventually predispose to the development of more severe complication and extreme caution have been taken in treating these patients. We performed a literature review searching for case reports and case series in order to offer evidence-based data for clinical management of these patients. Preexisting serological-only immune abnormalities or presence of a predisposing genetic background does not seem to confer significant risk but existing data is scarce. Most patients with preexistent autoimmune diseases can probably treated with checkpoint inhibitors as they seem to have at least the same response rate as the general cancer population. Under treatment, a significant part of them (at least 30%) can experience a flare of their baseline disease which can sometime be severe. Life-threatening cases seems rare and disease flare can be generally managed with steroids. The volume of available data is more important for rheumatologic diseases than for inflammatory bowel diseases were more caution should be observed. However, it has to be kept in mind that new immune related adverse effects (IrAE) are seen with a similar frequency as the flare of the baseline disease. Both flare-up's and newly developed IrAE are generally manageable with a careful clinical follow-up and prompt therapy., (Copyright © 2020 Coureau, Meert, Berghmans and Grigoriu.)

Purpose: Apart from organizational issues, quality of inter-professional collaboration during ethical decision-making may affect the intention to leave one's job. To determine whether ethical climate is associated with the intention to leave after adjustment for country, ICU and clinicians characteristics., Methods: Perceptions of the ethical climate among clinicians working in 68 adult ICUs in 12 European countries and the US were measured using a self-assessment questionnaire, together with job characteristics and intent to leave as a sub-analysis of the Dispropricus study. The validated ethical decision-making climate questionnaire included seven factors: not avoiding decision-making at end-of-life (EOL), mutual respect within the interdisciplinary team, open interdisciplinary reflection, ethical awareness, self-reflective physician leadership, active decision-making at end-of-life by physicians, and involvement of nurses in EOL. Hierarchical mixed effect models were used to assess associations between these factors, and the intent to leave in clinicians within ICUs, within the different countries., Results: Of 3610 nurses and 1137 physicians providing ICU bedside care, 63.1% and 62.9% participated, respectively. Of 2992 participating clinicians, 782 (26.1%) had intent to leave, of which 27% nurses, 24% junior and 22.7% senior physicians. After adjustment for country, ICU and clinicians characteristics, mutual respect OR 0.77 (95% CI 0.66- 0.90), open interdisciplinary reflection (OR 0.73 [95% CI 0.62-0.86]) and not avoiding EOL decisions (OR 0.87 [95% CI 0.77-0.98]) were all associated with a lower intent to leave., Conclusion: This is the first large multicenter study showing an independent association between clinicians' intent to leave and the quality of the ethical climate in the ICU. Interventions to reduce intent to leave may be most effective when they focus on improving mutual respect, interdisciplinary reflection and active decision-making at EOL.

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the benefit of direct ICU admission from the emergency department (ED) compared to admission from wards, in patients with hematological malignancies requiring critical care., Methods: Post hoc analysis derived from a prospective, multicenter cohort study of 1011 critically ill adult patients with hematologic malignancies admitted to 17 ICU in Belgium and France from January 2010 to May 2011. The variable of interest was a direct ICU admission from the ED and the outcome was in-hospital mortality. The association between the variable of interest and the outcome was assessed by multivariable logistic regression after multiple imputation of missing data. Several sensitivity analyses were performed: complete case analysis, propensity score matching and multivariable Cox proportional-hazards analysis of 90-day survival., Results: Direct ICU admission from the ED occurred in 266 (26.4%) cases, 84 of whom (31.6%) died in the hospital versus 311/742 (41.9%) in those who did not. After adjustment, direct ICU admission from the ED was associated with a decreased in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR: 0.63; 95% CI 0.45-0.88). This was confirmed in the complete cases analysis (adjusted OR: 0.64; 95% CI 0.45-0.92) as well as in terms of hazard of death within the 90 days after admission (adjusted HR: 0.77; 95% CI 0.60-0.99). By contrast, in the propensity score-matched sample of 402 patients, direct admission was not associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR: 0.92; 95% CI 0.84-1.01)., Conclusions: In this study, patients with hematological malignancies admitted to the ICU were more likely to be alive at hospital discharge if they were directly admitted from the ED rather than from the wards. Assessment of early predictors of poor outcome in cancer patients admitted to the ED is crucial so as to allow early referral to the ICU and avoid delays in treatment initiation and mis-orientation.

Background: Various immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have been reported to be associated with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors. We report a case of a patient with lung cancer treated with nivolumab who developed a bullous eruption and give a systematic review of the literature on irAEs in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors for lung cancer., Case Report: A patient with lung adenocarcinoma developed a non-specific skin lesion at the time of his cancer diagnosis followed by flare episodes until the eighth cycle of nivolumab, when he developed a bullous lupus. As the first eruption had started a few months after his cancer diagnosis and was exacerbated during immunotherapy, a paraneoplastic origin is discussed. Since the patient also presented with flares under nivolumab, we reviewed reported irAEs. No bullous lupus was found but to date, 33 cases of paraneoplastic lupus and two of lupus erythematosus have been reported., Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first description of a bullous lupus exacerbated by nivolumab., (Copyright© 2019, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Targeted therapies, molecules in full expansion, are not free of side effects that can lead patients to intensive care. We performed an extensive review of the published evidence and propose a management strategy for acute complications of targeted therapy in critically ill patients with cancer., Methods: The literature search was performed in August 2017 using the Ovid Medline system by a scientific librarian and physicians. We made a review of cases admitted in intensive care unit (ICU) and a review of toxicities of grades greater or equal to 3., Results: Our search selected 59 articles. The main cardiovascular side effects requiring ICU are heart failure, which is generally reversible, severe hypertension, thrombotic and ischemic events, and rhythm disturbances. The main pulmonary side effects are interstitial lung disease essentially caused by crizotinib, respiratory infections, pneumothorax, and alveolar hemorrhage. The main gastrointestinal side effects are fulminant hepatitis that may be fatal, colitis that may be complicated by hemorrhage, and perforation. The main neurological side effect is posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome essentially caused by bevacizumab. The main other side effects are Steven-Johnson syndrome, necrotizing fasciitis, and anaphylactic reactions., Conclusions: The side effects induced by targeted therapies may be fatal but are generally potentially reversible. The main treatment includes stopping current therapy and symptomatic management. Treatment rechallenge should be discussed on a case-by-case basis.

In patients with hematologic malignancies, respiratory status may deteriorate during neutropenia recovery. This multicenter, observational study aims to evaluate granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) impact on respiratory status in critically ill neutropenic patients. Among 1011 critically ill patients with hematologic malignancies, 288 were neutropenic and included in this study. 201 (70%) did not receive G-CSF at day 1 or 2. After propensity score matching for the probability of receiving G-CSF at day 1 or 2, there was no association between G-CSF and respiratory deterioration at day 14 (OR =1.19; 95%CI (0.57-2.51); p = .64). Additional sensitivity analysis in patients admitted for acute respiratory failure showed similar results (OR =1.34; 95%CI (0.5-3.59); p = .57). Among patients who recovered from neutropenia, 75% experienced respiratory deterioration during neutropenia recovery. This study confirms that neutropenia recovery is a situation at risk of respiratory deterioration. However, whether G-CSF is an aggravating factor cannot be supported by our results.

Introduction: It has been demonstrated in unselected populations of cancer patients that prognosis in intensive care is essentially dependent on the extent of the acute physiological disturbance caused by the complication precipitating the admission. By contrast, the prognosis after hospital discharge remains dependent on the characteristics of the underlying neoplasm. The aim of our study was to confirm whether this general finding was the case in a specific population of lung cancer patients, since there are no data on this patient group in the literature., Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study including all patients with lung cancer admitted to our ICU between September 1, 2008 and December 31, 2013., Results: During this period, 180 different patients with lung cancer were admitted into ICU. The simplified acute physiology score II (SAPS II) (OR 1.07 ; 95% CI 1.04-1.11), respiratory failure (OR 4.00; 95% CI 1.76-9.07) and the presence of therapeutic limitations were the 3 factors independently affecting hospital mortality in multivariate analysis. Considering only patients discharged alive from the hospital, the presence of metastases (HR 2.30; 95% CI 1.44-3.65) and limitations on therapy (HR 5,89; IC 95% 3,11-11,14) were the two statistically independent prognostic factors for overall survival., Conclusion: In this population of lung cancer patients admitted into ICU, independent predictors of hospital mortality are determined by the physiological perturbations induced by the acute presenting complication. After recovery from this, prognosis is again determined by the characteristics of the underlying cancer., (Copyright © 2018 SPLF. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Rationale: Noninvasive diagnostic multiplex molecular tests may enable the early identification and treatment of viral infections in critically ill immunocompromised patients., Objectives: To assess the association between viral detection in nasopharyngeal swabs and ICU mortality in critically ill hematology patients., Methods: This was a post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort of critically ill hematology patients admitted to 17 ICUs. Nasal swabs sampled and frozen at ICU admission were tested using a multiplex PCR assay. Predictors of ICU mortality and assay positivity were identified., Measurements and Main Results: Of the 747 patients (447 with acute respiratory failure [ARF]), 21.3% had a virus detected (56.4% rhinovirus/enterovirus and 30.7% influenza/parainfluenza/respiratory syncytial viruses). Overall ICU and hospital mortality rates were 26% and 37%, respectively. Assay positivity was associated with lymphoproliferative disorders, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, treatment with steroids or other immunosuppressants, ARF (25.5% vs. 16.3%; P = 0.004), and death in the ICU (28.9% vs. 19.3%; P = 0.008). The association with ICU mortality was significant for all viruses and was strongest for influenza/parainfluenza/respiratory syncytial viruses. In patients with ARF, detection of any respiratory virus was independently associated with ICU mortality (odds ratio, 2.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-3.50)., Conclusions: Respiratory virus detection in the upper airway by multiplex PCR assay is common in critically ill hematology patients. In patients with ARF, respiratory virus detection was independently associated with ICU mortality. Multiplex PCR assay may prove helpful for the risk stratification of hematology patients with ARF. Studies to understand whether respiratory tract viruses play a causal role in outcomes are warranted.

Checkpoint protein inhibitor antibodies (CPI), including cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 inhibitors (ipilimumab, tremelimumab) and the programmed cell death protein 1 pathway/programmed cell death protein 1 ligand inhibitors (pembrolizumab, nivolumab, durvalumab, atezolizumab), have entered routine practice for the treatment of many cancers. They improve the outcome for many cancers, and more patients will be treated with CPI in the future. Although CPI can lead to adverse events (AE) less frequently than for chemotherapy, their use can require intensive care unit admission in case of severe immune-related adverse events (IrAE). Moreover, some of these events, particularly late events, are poorly documented, so a high level of suspicion should be maintained for patients receiving CPI. Intensivists should be aware in general of the known complications and appropriate management of these AE. Nevertheless, a multidisciplinary collaboration remains essential for their diagnosis and management. This review described the most severe complications related to CPI.

Background: Although outcomes of critically ill patients with haematological malignancies (HMs) have been fully investigated in terms of organ failure and mortality, data are scarce on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in this population. We aim to assess post-intensive care unit (ICU) burden and HRQOL of critically ill patients with HMs and to identify risk factors for quality-of-life (QOL) impairment., Results: In total, 1011 patients with HMs who required ICU admission in 17 ICUs in France and Belgium were included in the study; 278 and 117 patients were evaluated for QOL at 3 months and 1 year, respectively, after ICU discharge. HRQOL was determined by applying the interview form of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire. Psychological distress symptoms were evaluated using the Hospital Anxiety Depression Score (HADS) and the Impact of Event Scale (IES). In-hospital mortality rates at 3 months and 1 year were, respectively, 39.1, 50.7 and 57.2%, respectively. At 3 months, median [IQR] physical and mental component summary scores (PCS and MCS) (SF-36) were 37 [28-46] and 51 [45-58], respectively. PCS was lower in ICU patients with HMs when compared to general ICU septic patients (52 [5-13], p = 0.00001). The median combined HAD score was 8 [5-13], and the median IES score was 8 [3-16]. However, recovery during the first year after ICU discharge was not consistent in all dimensions of HRQOL. Three months after ICU discharge, the maximum daily Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and status of the underlying malignancy at ICU admission were significantly associated with MCS impairment (- 0.54 points [95% CI - 0.99; - 0.1], p = 0.018 and - 4.83 points [95% CI - 8.44; - 1.22], p = 0.009, respectively)., Conclusion: HRQOL is strongly impaired in critically ill patients with HMs at 3 months and 1 year after ICU discharge. Organ failure and disease status are strongly associated with QOL. The kinetic evaluation of QOL at 3 months and 1 year offers the opportunity to focus on QOL aspects that may be improved by therapeutic interventions during the first year after ICU discharge.

The European Respiratory Society (ERS) task force for harmonised standards for lung cancer registration and lung cancer services in Europe recognised the need to create a single dataset for use in pan-European data collection and a manual of standards for European lung cancer services.The multidisciplinary task force considered evidence from two different sources, reviewing existing national and international datasets alongside the results of a survey of clinical data collection on lung cancer in 35 European countries. A similar process was followed for the manual of lung cancer services, with the task force using existing guidelines and national or international recommendations for lung cancer services to develop a manual of standards for services in Europe.The task force developed essential and minimum datasets for lung cancer registration to enable all countries to collect the same essential data and some to collect data with greater detail. The task force also developed a manual specifying standards for lung cancer services in Europe.Despite the wide variation in the sociopolitical landscape across Europe, the ERS is determined to encourage the delivery of high-quality lung cancer care. Both the manual of lung cancer services and the minimum dataset for lung cancer registration will support this aspiration., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: A.L. Rich has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D.R. Baldwin reports personal fees for lecturing from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: P. Beckett has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: T. Berghmans has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Boyd is an employee of the European Lung Foundation. Conflict of interest: C. Faivre-Finn reports research funding and business travel support from Merck, AstraZeneca and Pfizer, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: F. Galateau Salle has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: F. Gamarra has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: B. Grigoriu has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: N-C.G. Hansen has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Hardavella has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Jakobsen has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D. Jovanovic has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Konsoulova has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Massard has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. McPhelim reports personal fees from Roche, MSD, Pfizer, Lilly Oncology and Abbvie, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: A-P. Meert has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Milroy has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Mutti has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Paesmans has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M.D. Peake has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P.M. Putora has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D.K.M. de Ruysscher has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J-P. Sculier has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Schepereel has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D.R. Subotic has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P. Van Schil has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: T.G. Blum has nothing to disclose., (Copyright ©ERS 2018.)