Search

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor-2 (TNFR2) has attracted considerable interest as a target for immunotherapy. Indeed, using oligomeric fusion proteins of single chainencoded TNFR2-specific TNF mutants (scTNF80), expansion of regulatory T cells and therapeutic activity could be demonstrated in various autoinflammatory diseases, including graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and collagen-induced arthritis (CIA). With the aim to improve the in vivo availability of TNFR2-specific TNF fusion proteins, we used here the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn)-interacting IgG1 molecule as an oligomerizing building block and generated a new TNFR2 agonist with improved serum retention and superior in vivo activity. Methods: Single-chain encoded murine TNF80 trimers (sc(mu)TNF80) were fused to the C-terminus of an in mice irrelevant IgG1 molecule carrying the N297A mutation which avoids/minimizes interaction with Fcg-receptors (FcgRs). The fusion protein obtained (irrIgG1(N297A)-sc(mu)TNF80), termed NewSTAR2 (New selective TNF-based agonist of TNF receptor 2), was analyzed with respect to activity, productivity, serum retention and in vitro and in vivo activity. STAR2 (TNC-sc(mu)TNF80 or selective TNF-based agonist of TNF receptor 2), a well-established highly active nonameric TNFR2-specific variant, served as benchmark. NewSTAR2 was assessed in various in vitro and in vivo systems. Results: STAR2 (TNC-sc(mu)TNF80) and NewSTAR2 (irrIgG1(N297A)-sc(mu)TNF80) revealed comparable in vitro activity. The novel domain architecture of NewSTAR2 significantly improved serum retention compared to STAR2, which correlated with efficient binding to FcRn. A single injection of NewSTAR2 enhanced regulatory T cell (Treg) suppressive activity and increased Treg numbers by > 300% in vivo 5 days after treatment. Treg numbers remained as high as 200% for about 10 days. Furthermore, a single in vivo treatment with NewSTAR2 upregulated the adenosine-regulating ectoenzyme CD39 and other activation markers on Tregs. TNFR2-stimulated Tregs proved to be more suppressive than unstimulated Tregs, reducing conventional T cell (Tcon) proliferation and expression of activation markers in vitro. Finally, singular preemptive NewSTAR2 administration five days before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) protected mice from acute GvHD. Conclusions: NewSTAR2 represents a next generation ligand-based TNFR2 agonist, which is efficiently produced, exhibits improved pharmacokinetic properties and high serum retention with superior in vivo activity exerting powerful protective effects against acute GvHD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

TNFR1 is a crucial regulator of NF‐ĸB‐mediated proinflammatory cell survival responses and programmed cell death (PCD). Deregulation of TNFα‐ and TNFR1‐controlled NF‐ĸB signaling underlies major diseases, like cancer, inflammation, and autoimmune diseases. Therefore, although being routinely used, antagonists of TNFα might also affect TNFR2‐mediated processes, so that alternative approaches to directly antagonize TNFR1 are beneficial. Here, we apply quantitative single‐molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) of TNFR1 in physiologic cellular settings to validate and characterize TNFR1 inhibitory substances, exemplified by the recently described TNFR1 antagonist zafirlukast. Treatment of TNFR1‐mEos2 reconstituted TNFR1/2 knockout mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) with zafirlukast inhibited both ligand‐independent preligand assembly domain (PLAD)‐mediated TNFR1 dimerization as well as TNFα‐induced TNFR1 oligomerization. In addition, zafirlukast‐mediated inhibition of TNFR1 clustering was accompanied by deregulation of acute and prolonged NF‐ĸB signaling in reconstituted TNFR1‐mEos2 MEFs and human cervical carcinoma cells. These findings reveal the necessity of PLAD‐mediated, ligand‐independent TNFR1 dimerization for NF‐ĸB activation, highlight the PLAD as central regulator of TNFα‐induced TNFR1 oligomerization, and demonstrate that TNFR1‐mEos2 MEFs can be used to investigate TNFR1‐antagonizing compounds employing single‐molecule quantification and functional NF‐ĸB assays at physiologic conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In vivo research of the last decade revealed that the anchoring of antitumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor superfamily (TNFRSF) receptor antibodies to cell-expressed Fcγ receptors (FcγR) can be of decisive relevance for their receptor-stimulatory activity. Indeed, FcγR anchoring may even result in the conversion of antagonistic to agonistic anti-TNFR antibody activity. The knowledge on this issue is obviously not only relevant to understand the in vivo effects of anti-TNFR antibodies but also of overwhelming importance for the rational clinical development of antibodies and antibody derivatives. Based on the fact that with exception of the decoy TNFRSF receptors (TNFRs) all TNFRs are able to trigger proinflammatory NFκB signaling, resulting in the production of chemokines and cytokines, we established an easy and broadly applicable coculture assay for the evaluation of the FcγR-dependency of the agonism of anti-TNFR antibodies. In this assay, TNFR responder cells, which produce high amounts of IL8 in response to TNFR stimulation, were pairwise incubated with empty vector- and FcγR-transfected HEK293 cells, which produce only very low amounts of IL8. This cocultures were then comparatively analyzed with respect to anti-TNFR antibody-induced IL8 production as a readout for TNFR activation to uncover proagonistic effects of FcγR binding.

Quantitative analysis of the binding of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily ligands (TNFLs) to TNF receptor superfamily receptors (TNFRs) is of crucial relevance for the understanding of the mechanisms of TNFR activation. Ligand binding studies are also a basic method required for the development and characterization of agonists and antagonists of TNFRs. TNFL-induced formation of fully active TNFR signaling complexes is a complex process. It involves not only reorganization of monomeric and inactive pre-assembled TNFR complexes into trimeric liganded TNFR complexes but also the secondary interaction of the latter. Moreover, various factors, e.g., TNFR modification, special membrane domains, or accessory proteins, may affect TNFL-TNFR interactions in a TNFR type-specific manner. Widely used cell-free methods for the analysis of protein-protein interactions are thus of limited value for the analysis of TNFL-TNFR interactions and makes therefore in this case cellular binding studies to the method of choice. We and others observed that the genetic fusion of monomeric protein domains to the N-terminus of soluble TNFLs has typically no effect on activity and TNFR binding. We exploited this to generate bioluminescent TNFL fusion proteins which allow simple, sensitive, and highly reproducible cellular binding studies for the investigation of TNFL-TNFR interactions. Here, we report detailed protocols for the production of TNFL fusion proteins with the luciferase of Gaussia princeps and the use of these fusion proteins in various types of cellular binding studies.