1. Consensus-based antimicrobial resistance and stewardship competencies for UK undergraduate medical students
- Author
-
McMaster, David, Courtenay, Molly, Santucci, Catherine, Davies, Angharad P, Kirby, Andrew, Seddon, Owen, Price, David A, Barlow, Gavin, Lim, Felicia H, Davies, Bethany S, O'Shea, Matthew K, Collini, Paul, Basarab, Marina, Ahmad, Afshan, Albur, Mahableshwar, Hemsley, Carolyn, Brown, Nicholas M, O'Gorman, Ciaran, Rautemaa-Richardson, Riina, Davies, Geraint R, Penfold, Christopher N, Patel, Sanjay, Keep Antibiotics Working (KAW) Group, McMaster, David [0000-0003-1900-8785], Rautemaa-Richardson, Riina [0000-0002-1071-6040], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Response rate (survey) ,Medical education ,030106 microbiology ,education ,Modified delphi ,MEDLINE ,Keep Antibiotics Working (KAW) group ,03 medical and health sciences ,Qualitative feedback ,0302 clinical medicine ,Antibiotic resistance ,AcademicSubjects/MED00290 ,Antimicrobial stewardship ,AcademicSubjects/MED00740 ,Original Article ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Stewardship ,Psychology ,AcademicSubjects/MED00230 ,Curriculum - Abstract
Background In the UK there is limited coverage of antimicrobial stewardship across postgraduate curricula and evidence that final year medical students have insufficient and inconsistent antimicrobial stewardship teaching. A national undergraduate curriculum for antimicrobial resistance and stewardship is required to standardize an adequate level of understanding for all future doctors. Objectives To provide a UK national consensus on competencies for antimicrobial resistance and stewardship for undergraduate medical education. Methods Using the modified Delphi method over two online survey rounds, an expert panel comprising leads for infection teaching from 25 UK medical schools reviewed competency descriptors for antimicrobial resistance and stewardship education. Results There was a response rate of 100% with all 28 experts who agreed to take part completing both survey rounds. Following the first-round survey, of the initial 55 descriptors, 43 reached consensus (78%). The second-round survey included the 12 descriptors from the first round in which agreement had not been reached, four amended descriptors and 12 new descriptors following qualitative feedback from the panel members. Following the second-round survey, a total of 58 consensus-based competency descriptors within six overarching domains were identified. Conclusions The consensus-based competency descriptors defined here can be used to inform standards, design curricula, develop assessment tools and direct UK undergraduate medical education.
- Published
- 2020