Search

Sarah Bassiony, Claire N Harrison, Donal P McLornan Department of Haematology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UKCorrespondence: Donal P McLornanDepartment of Haematology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Guy’s Tower, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UKTel +44 20 7188 2742Email donal.mclornan@nhs.netAbstract: Myelofibrosis is a heterogeneous disorder with regard to both molecular pathogenesis and clinical phenotype, ranging from an initial fairly indolent condition in some through to an aggressive and debilitating scenario with profound constitutional symptoms, cytopenia frequently requiring transfusional support, and massive splenomegaly. Many advances have been made within the therapeutic arena, and an increasing array of novel agents are now available for disease management. Within this review, we focus on the current and predicted role of the JAK inhibitor momelotinib (Sierra Oncology) in myelofibrosis, with an emphasis on clinical trial evaluation, drug efficacyand safety, and discuss the suggested place in the therapeutic paradigm of myelofibrosis in 2020 and beyond.Keywords: myelofibrosis, JAK inhibitors, momelotinib

We looked at treatment rates and center density across countries for patients treated in 2022; 46,143 HCTs (19,011 (41.2%) allogeneic, 27,132 (58.8%) autologous) reported by 689 centers. 4329 patients received advanced cellular therapies, 3205 were CAR-T. We found considerable differences in utilization of autologous, allogeneic HCT and more so for CAR-T. Differences in procedure type and for allogeneic HCT in donor use and disease indication are highlighted. For instance, countries with the highest use of unrelated donors per 10 million inhabitants were Germany (297) and the Netherlands (230), for identical sibling HCT it was Israel (148) and Lebanon (113), for haploidentical it was Israel (94) and Italy (94) and for cord blood it was the Netherlands (24) and the United Kingdom (15). We looked at HCT use for specific indications in allogeneic HCT (AML CR1, MDS, MPN and BMF). We correlated treatment rates with GNI and with demographic age structure and show correlations in HCT and CAR-T use and center density, highest in Italy for allogeneic and autologous HCT and in Switzerland for CAR-T. Resource restricted countries tend to concentrate HCT use in a limited number of centers. These data are useful for comparisons across countries., Competing Interests: Competing interests: There are no conflicts of interest to declare. The writing of the manuscript was the sole responsibility of the authors. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This manuscript follows the relevant guidelines and regulations as appropriate. All graphics were self-generated. The data analysis is based on center level data and no individual patient data are included, as such no ethics committee approval is needed. Patient informed consent is not needed., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN) are a complication of multiple myeloma (MM) treatment. Our retrospective, EBMT registry study included 157 such patients allografted (allo-HCT) between 2006 and 2018. Most patients (130) had a prior autologous HCT. Fifty-seven (36.4%) were transplanted for t-AML and 100 (63.6%) for t-MDS. Median times from MM and t-MN diagnoses to allo-HCT were 72.6 (interquartile range (IQR), 46.1-102.9) and 6.4 (IQR, 3.9-9.4) months. Fifty-eight (38.4%) t-MN patients were in complete remission (CR) at allo-HCT predominantly conditioned with reduced intensity (70.3%). With a median follow-up of 64.9 (95% CI: 39-76) months, relapse incidence (RI) from MM at 1 and 5 years was 4% (0-10%) and 12% (2-22%), respectively, with few deaths (n = 3) only due to MM disease progression, whereas t-MN RI and non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 1 and 5 years were 35% (95% CI 28-43%) and 45% (95% CI: 36-53%) and 20% (95% CI 13-26%) and 31% (95% CI: 23-39%). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) estimates at 1 and 5 years were 55% (95% CI: 47-63%) and 27% (95% CI: 19-35%) and 45% (95% CI 36-53%) and 24% (95% CI 16-32%). Older (>65 years) t-MN patients with high-risk cytogenetics do not benefit from allo-HCT., Competing Interests: Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplants (auto-HCTs) remain the standard of care for transplant-eligible MM patients. The general practice has been to undergo upfront apheresis following induction to collect sufficient number of CD34+ cells to facilitate two auto-HCTs. However, 5-30% of MM patients do not initially mobilise a sufficient number of hematopoietic stem cells and are classified as poor mobilizers (PM). We compared the baseline characteristics and outcomes of 61 PMs and 816 non-PM patients who underwent a second auto-HCT and who were enrolled in the non-interventional CALM study (NCT01362972). Only patients who collected CD34+ prior to auto-HCT1 were included. Auto-HCT2 comprised both tandem and salvage transplants. PMs were re-mobilized with plerixafor (n = 24, 39.3%) or non-plerixafor-based regimens (n = 37, 60.7%). There were no significant differences in engraftment, progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) after the second auto-HCT between PM and non-PM patients. There was a trend to shorter PFS in PM patients undergoing salvage auto-HCT (median 9.6 vs. 12.9 months; p = 0.08) but no significant difference in OS. The median OS was 41.1 months for PM and 41.2 months for non-PM patients (p = 0.86). These data suggest that salvage mobilization is effective and does not affect overall outcomes after a second auto-HCT., Competing Interests: Competing interests JDS – honoraria AbbVie, Roche, Janssen, Astra Zeneca, SOBI, Takeda, BMS, Novartis, Swixx; Advisory board meetings organized by Janssen-Cilag, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Roche, BeiGene; AP - honoraria from Behring and Abbvie, participation in scientific Advisory board meetings organized by Abbvie, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi and Takeda; none of COI directly related to the study. Ethics approval This retrospective study was approved by the Chronic Malignancies Working Party (CMWP) of the EBMT and was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) is a commonly used treatment in multiple myeloma (MM). However, real-world global demographic and outcome data are scarce. We collected data on baseline characteristics and outcomes from 61 725 patients with newly diagnosed MM who underwent upfront AHCT between 2013 and 2017 from nine national/international registries. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), relapse incidence (RI) and non-relapse mortality (NRM). Median OS amounted to 90.2 months (95% CI 88.2-93.6) and median PFS 36.5 months (95% CI 36.1-37.0). At 24 months, cumulative RI was 33% (95% CI 32.5%-33.4%) and NRM was 2.5% (95% CI 2.3%-2.6%). In the multivariate analysis, superior outcomes were associated with younger age, IgG subtype, complete hematological response at auto-HCT, Karnofsky score of 100%, international staging scoring (ISS) stage 1, HCT-comorbidity index (CI) 0, standard cytogenetic risk, auto-HCT in recent years, and use of lenalidomide maintenance. There were differences in the baseline characteristics and outcomes between registries. While the NRM was 1%-3% at 12 months worldwide, the OS at 36 months was 69%-84%, RI at 12 months was 12%-24% and PFS at 36 months was 43%-63%. The variability in these outcomes is attributable to differences in patient and disease characteristics as well as the use of maintenance and macroeconomic factors. In conclusion, worldwide data indicate that AHCT in MM is a safe and effective therapy with an NRM of 1%-3% with considerable regional differences in OS, PFS, RI, and patient characteristics. Maintenance treatment post-AHCT had a beneficial effect on OS., (© 2024 The Author(s). American Journal of Hematology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Pacritinib is a JAK2/IRAK1/ACVR1 inhibitor that is approved in the United States for the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis who have a platelet count < 50 × 109/L. Phase 3 clinical studies of pacritinib included patients across a wide range of baseline platelet and hemoglobin levels., Patients and Methods: In order to assess the impact of baseline blood counts on pacritinib efficacy, an analysis of efficacy outcomes by baseline platelet and hemoglobin levels was performed using data pooled from 2 Phase 3 studies of pacritinib in patients with MF (PERSIST-1 and PERSIST-2)., Results: Of 276 patients evaluable for spleen response, spleen volume reduction occurred consistently across platelet subgroups (< 100 × 109/L or ≥ 100 × 109/L) and hemoglobin subgroups (< 8 g/dL, ≥ 8 to < 10 g/dL, or > 10 g/dL), with no diminution in treatment effect in patients with severe thrombocytopenia or anemia. Among 159 patients evaluable for symptoms response, improvement in total symptom score (TTS) was similar across platelet subgroups. A ≥ 50% improvement of TSS occurred more frequently in patients with baseline hemoglobin < 8 g/dL compared with those with baseline hemoglobin ≥ 8 to < 10 g/dL or > 10 g/dL. Patients with baseline hemoglobin < 8 g/dL also experienced improved hemoglobin sustained over 24 weeks, whereas subgroups with less severe anemia had stable hemoglobin levels over time. Symptom improvement as assessed using the Patient Global Impression of Change instrument was generally consistent across platelet and hemoglobin subgroups., Conclusion: Pacritinib demonstrates consistent efficacy in patients with MF regardless of baseline platelet and hemoglobin counts., Competing Interests: Disclosure Nico Gagelmann: has consulted for Morphosys and Kite/Gilead; and has received travel support from Kite/Gilead, Janssen, and Neovii. Prithviraj Bose: has consulted for or received honoraria from AbbVie, Blueprint, BMS, Cogent, CTI BioPharma Corp., a Sobi company, Disc Medicine, GSK, Incyte, Ionis, Jubilant, Karyopharm, Morphic, MorphoSys, Novartis, PharmaEssentia, and Sumitomo; and has received research funding from Blueprint, BMS, Cogent, CTI BioPharma Corp., a Sobi company, DISC Medicine, Geron, Incyte, Ionis, Janssen, Kartos, Karyopharm, MorphoSys, Sumitomo, and Telios. Vikas Gupta: has consulted for AbbVie, BMS-Celgene, CTI BioPharma Corp., a Sobi company, GSK, Imago, Incyte, Karyopharm, MorphoSys, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche; has received research funding from Novartis, Incyte; has participated in advisory boards for AbbVie, BMS- Celgene, Constellation, CTI BioPharma Corp., a Sobi company, GSK, Incyte, Novartis, Pfizer. Donal P. McLornan: has received speakers fees from AbbVie, BMS/Celgene, Jazz Pharmaceuticals and Novartis; has received research funding from BMS/Celgene and Jazz Pharmaceuticals; and has participated on advisory boards and received travel assistance from Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Pankit Vachhani: has received honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Blueprint Medicines, Cogent Biosciences, Incyte, CTI BioPharma., a Sobi company, Daiichi Sankyo, GSK, Karyopharm, Novartis, Pfizer, Genetech, Inc., Servier, Stemline, MorphoSys, and LAVA Therapeutics; and has participated in speaker's bureaus for Incyte, CTI BioPharma Corp., a Sobi company, and Blueprint Medicines. Hafia Kathrin Al-Ali: has received research funding from BMS and Incyte; has participated on advisory boards and/or received honoraria: AbbVie, AOP Pharma, Blueprint, BMS, GSK, Otsuka, and Novartis; and has received travel assistance from AbbVie, BMS and Alexion. Haris Ali: has received research/ grant support from Incyte, has consulted for Karyopharm, GSK, and PharmaEssentia, and has participated in speakers bureaus for BluePrint and BMS. Philipp Treskes: consults for Sobi Inc. Sarah Buckley: is employed by Sobi Inc. and has received payment of unvested equity awards from CTI BioPharma Corp., a Sobi company, following its acquisition in June 2023 by the Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB (publ). Karisse Roman-Torres: is employed by Sobi Inc. and has received payment of unvested equity awards from CTI BioPharma Corp., a Sobi company, following its acquisition in June 2023 by the Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB (publ). Bart Scott: has participated on the data and safety monitoring board for Nektar and Johnson and Johnson; has participated in advisory panels for BMS, Celgene, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis; has consulted for Alexion, Celgene, BMS, and Incyte; has received honoraria from Celgene, and BMS; and has received research funding from BMS and Novartis., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Heterogeneous approaches exist in regard to the management of disease-related co-morbidities in potential allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) candidates with myelofibrosis (MF). The EBMT Chronic Malignancies Working Party launched an electronic survey to evaluate how MF-specific comorbidities are approached and whether they ultimately affect the decision to transplant. A total of 41/63 (65%) Centers, all of whom were experienced in the management of MF allo-HCT, responded. Responses were aggregated and reported in a comparative fashion. Screening for portal hypertension (PH) was routinely performed in 54% centers, never in 12% and guided by clinical manifestations in the remaining. Involvement of hepatologists/gastroenterologists was always/very often considered in patients with signs of PH prior to transplant. Centers reported that radiological evidence of PH did not routinely represent a formal contraindication for allo-HCT in most cases (78%). Of note, most centers (61%) did not perform routine screening for gastroesophageal varices; this was systematically considered or guided by clinical manifestations in only 7% and 32% centers, respectively. Presence of gastroesophageal varices was always (15%) or occasionally (19%) considered a formal contraindication to allo-HCT. A prior history of portal vein thrombosis never (78%) or occasionally (15%) represented a formal contraindication. Three Centers would not proceed to transplant in such cases. Less importance was assigned to non-portal splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT), with all but one centre proceeding to transplant regardless of prior SVT. This survey highlights a considerable heterogeneity across responding centers in approaching MF-related comorbidities prior to transplant, suggesting that harmonisation guidelines are needed to address these issues in this patient population., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Significant efforts have been made to effectively select myelofibrosis (MF) patients who can benefit from allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), the only current cure for MF. The recent EBMT/ELN 2024 recommendations offer valuable guidance for hematologists and transplant physicians. However, several grey areas remain in day-to-day clinical practice regarding the feasibility and optimal preparation for transplantation in patients with this disease. Effective spleen size reduction, often achieved with JAK inhibitors, appears crucial for transplant success. For resistant cases, switching JAK inhibitors, splenectomy, or spleen irradiation may be considered, taking into account patient profiles, treatment availability and center preferences. Managing splanchnic vein thromboses, portal, and pulmonary hypertension is critical as these conditions may affect transplant outcomes. Cytopenias, particularly transfusion-dependent anemia and thrombocytopenia, complicate treatment and impact on outcomes, though new drugs show promise. Comorbidities play a significant role and tools like the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) and frailty assessments are useful for evaluating transplant risks while allowing the implementation of corrective measures. Especially in low- and medium-income countries where access to novel therapies may be challenging, allo-HCT still represents an attractive therapeutic option for MF. Future directions include integrating new therapeutics into the transplant algorithm and leveraging artificial intelligence for more informed risk assessment, highlighting the need for tailored approaches to improve allo-HCT outcomes in such a setting., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Promoting access to and excellence in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) by collecting and disseminating data on global HCT activities is one of the principal activities of the Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, a non-governmental organization in working relations with the World Health Organization. HCT activities are recorded annually by member societies, national registries and individual centers including indication, donor type (allogeneic/autologous), donor match and stem cell source (bone marrow/peripheral blood stem cells/cord blood). In 2018, 1,768 HCT teams in 89 countries (6 World Health Organization regions) reported 93,105 (48,680 autologous and 44,425 allogeneic) HCT. Major indications were plasma cell disorders and lymphoma for autologous, and acute leukemias and MDS/MPN for allogeneic HCT. HCT numbers increased from 48,709 in 2007. Notable increases were seen for autoimmune diseases in autologous and hemoglobinopathies in allogeneic HCT. The number of allogeneic HCT more than doubled with significant changes in donor match. While HCT from HLA-identical siblings has seen only limited growth, HCT from non-identical related donors showed significant increase worldwide. Strongest correlation between economic growth indicator of gross national income/capita and HCT activity/10 million population was observed for autologous HCT (correlation coefficient [r]=0.79). HCT from unrelated donors showed strong correlation (r=0.68), but only moderate correlation was detected from related donors (r=0.48 for HLA-identical sibling; r=0.45 for other). The use of HCT doubled in about a decade worldwide at different speed and with significant changes regarding donor match as a sign of improved access to HCT worldwide. Although narrowing, significant gaps remain between developing and non-developing countries.

Abstract: It has been reported in prospective randomized trials that antithymocyte globulin (ATG)-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis has benefits in the setting of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) with unrelated donors (UDs). However, the optimal GVHD prophylaxis strategy has been challenged recently by the increasing use of posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY). We report from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry the outcomes of 960 patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms who underwent allo-HSCT from UD with PTCY or ATG as GVHD prophylaxis. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The disease characteristics were similar in both groups. Day 28 neutrophil engraftment was significantly better with ATG (93% vs 85%). Over a median follow-up of 4.4 years, the 5-year OS was 58% with PTCY, and 49% in the ATG group. The 5-year PFS was higher for PTCY at 53% vs 44% for ATG. Grade 2 to 4 acute GVHD incidence was lower when PTCY was used (23%), whereas there was no difference in the incidence of chronic GVHD at 5 years. Multivariable analyses confirmed better OS and PFS with PTCY with a hazard ratio (HR) for ATG of 1.32 (1-1.74) and a better PFS for PTCY with a HR for ATG of 1.33. This study suggests that GVHD prophylaxis using PTCY instead of ATG in this setting remains a valid option. Further prospective randomized studies would be essential to confirm these results., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Short-term outcome of myeloablative (MAC) and reduced intensity (RIC) conditioning in the prospective randomized international EBMT RICMAC study in patients with myelodyplastic syndrome (MDS) was comparable but longer follow up is lacking. Patients with MDS aged 18-65 years were randomized to receive MAC (N = 64) with busulfan/cyclophosphamide or RIC (n = 65) with busulfan/fludarabine followed by stem cell transplantation -(HCT) from HLA matched or mismatched donor. After a median follow-up of 6.2 (0.4-12.5) years, 10-year OS and RFS were 54.0% and 43.9% for RIC and 44.4% and 44.2% for MAC (p = 0.15 and p = 0.78), respectively. Since the first report, 6 patients died on NRM, 4 after RIC, and 2 after MAC. Similarly, 8 patients relapsed (4 in each arm), increasing the number of relapsed patients to 28. The second HCT was performed in 18 pts, 8 in the MAC, and 10 in the RIC arm. In a multivariate analysis, ECOG status and chemotherapy prior to HCT were independent risk factors for OS and RFS, ECOG and low cytogenetic risk for NRM and chemotherapy prior to HCT for RI. Patients with low cytogenetic risk had better OS [p = 0.002], RFS [p = 0.02], and NRM (p = 0.015) after RIC as compared to MAC., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Abstract: In patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), higher revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) scores at transplant are associated with worse transplant outcome and, thus, lowering IPSS-R scores by therapeutic intervention before transplantation may seem beneficial. However, there is no evidence, to date, to support this approach. In a retrospective analysis, a total of 1482 patients with MDS with sufficient data to calculate IPSS-R score at diagnosis and at time of transplantation were selected from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation transplant registry and analyzed for transplant outcome in a multivariable Cox model including IPSS-R score at diagnosis, treatment intervention, change in IPSS-R score before transplant, and several patient and transplant variables. Transplant outcome was unaffected by IPSS-R score change in untreated patients and moderately superior in patients treated with chemotherapy with improved IPSS-R score at transplant. Improved IPSS-R score after hypomethylating agents (HMAs) or other therapies showed no beneficial effect. However, when IPSS-R score progressed after chemotherapy, HMAs, or other therapies, transplant outcome was worse than without any prior treatment. Similar results were found when reduction or increase in bone marrow (BM) blasts between diagnosis and transplantation was considered. The results show a limited benefit of IPSS-R score downstaging or reduction of BM blasts after chemotherapy and no benefit for HMAs or other treatments and thus question the role of prior therapy in patients with MDS scheduled for transplantation. The model-based survival estimates should help inform decision-making for both doctors and patients., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

We aimed to compare outcomes following treosulfan (TREO) or busulfan (BU) conditioning in a large cohort of myelofibrosis (MF) patients from the EBMT registry. A total of 530 patients were included; 73 received TREO and 457 BU (BU ≤ 6.4 mg/kg in 134, considered RIC, BU > 6.4 mg/kg in 323 considered higher dose (HD)). Groups were compared using adjusted Cox models. Cumulative incidences of engraftment and acute GVHD were similar across the 3 groups. The TREO group had significantly better OS than BU-HD (HR:0.61, 95% CI: 0.39-0.93) and a trend towards better OS over BU-RIC (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.41-1.05). Moreover, the TREO cohort had a significantly better Progression-Free-Survival (PFS) than both the BU-HD (HR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.38-0.84) and BU-RIC (HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.39-0.91) cohorts, which had similar PFS estimates. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) was reduced in the TREO and BU-RIC cohorts (HR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.24-0.80 TREO vs BU-HD; HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.28-1.04 TREO vs BU-RIC). Of note, relapse risk did not significantly differ across the three groups. In summary, within the limits of a registry-based study, TREO conditioning may improve PFS in MF HSCT and have lower NRM than BU-HD with a similar relapse risk to BU-RIC. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Management of Richter transformation (RT) is particularly challenging, with survival estimates <1 year. We report on outcomes of 66 RT patients undergoing allogeneic-HCT (allo-HCT) between 2008 and 2018 registered with the EBMT. Median age at allo-HCT was 56.2 years (interquartile range (IQR), 51.3-63.1). Median time from RT to allo-HCT was 6.9 months (IQR, 4.9-11) and 28 (42.4%) were in complete remission (CR). The majority underwent reduced intensity conditioning (66.2%) using peripheral blood derived stem cells. Eighteen (27.3%) patients had a matched sibling donor, 24 (36.4%) a matched unrelated donor and the remaining were mismatched. Median follow-up was 6.6 years; 1- and 3- year overall and progression free survival (PFS) (95% CI) was 65% (54-77) and 39% (27-51) and 53% (41-65) and 29% (18-40), respectively. Patients in CR at time of allo-HCT had significantly better 3-year PFS (39% vs. 21%, p = 0.032). Cumulative incidences of grade II-IV acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) at day +100 was 41% (95% CI 29-53) and chronic GVHD at 3 years was 53% (95% CI 41-65). High rates of non-relapse mortality (NRM) were observed; 38% (95% CI, 26-50) at 3 years. Although potentially curative, approaches to reduce considerable NRM and chronic GVHD rates are required., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains an option for tyrosine kinase inhibitor-resistant chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) in first chronic phase (CP1) and high-risk patients with advanced disease phases. In this European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) registry-based study of 1686 CML patients undergoing first allo-HCT between 2012 and 2019, outcomes were evaluated according to donor type, particularly focusing on mismatched related donors (MMRDs). Median age at allo-HCT was 46 years (IQR 36-55). Disease status was CP1 in 43%, second CP (CP2) or later in 27%, accelerated phase in 12% and blast crisis in 18%. Donor type was matched related (MRD) in 39.2%, MMRD in 8.1%, matched unrelated (MUD) in 40.2%, and mismatched unrelated (MMUD) in 12.6%. In 4 years, overall survival (OS) for MRD, MMRD, MUD and MMUD was 61%, 56%, 63% and 59% (p = 0.21); relapse-free survival (RFS) was 48%, 42%, 52% and 46% (p = 0.03); cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 33%, 37%, 27% and 30% (p = 0.07); non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 19%, 21%, 21% and 24% (p = 0.21); and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD)-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 16%, 18%, 22% and 15% (p = 0.05) respectively. On multivariate analysis, MMRD use associated with longer engraftment times and higher risk of graft failure compared to MRD or MUD. There was no statistical evidence that MMRD use associated with different OS, RFS and incidence of GvHD compared to other donor types., (© 2024 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) was developed more than 65 years ago to treat malignant blood disorders and irreversible bone marrow failures, with the aim of replacing a diseased hematopoietic system with a healthy one (allogeneic HCT). Decades later, the procedure was adapted to apply maximal chemotherapy or radiotherapy, which would result in bone marrow failure, but could be remedied by an infusion of a patient's own cryopreserved bone marrow (autologous HCT). Both treatments are high-risk and complex, especially during the initial phases. However, concerted efforts, vision, and collaboration between physicians and centers worldwide have resulted in HCT becoming a standard of care for many hematological disorders with progressive improvements in outcomes. Registries and the collaboration of societies worldwide have enabled the delivery of this curative therapy to many patients with fatal hematological diseases. More than 1.5 million HCT were performed between 1957 and 2019, and activity is continuously increasing worldwide., Competing Interests: Declaration of cometing interest NH reports advisory board honoraria from Janssen, Novartis, Takeda, Abbvie, Roche, Astellas and Bigene. YA reports consulting fees from JCR Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. and Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd., lecture fees from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Novartis Pharma KK, AbbVie GK, and honorarium from Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd. MI is affiliated with the Department of Promotion for Blood and Marrow Transplantation at the Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, and the department is endowed by AIR WATER INC., Clinigen K.K., and JCR Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. CF reports support for attending meetings from Casa Bollar and support for attending meetings and travel from Diaz Gill Lab and Prosalud. LG reports consulting fees from Sanofi, Janssen Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, and GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals and support for attending meetings and travel from Pfizer and Sanofi. KK reports honoraria from Pierre Fabre, Medac, and Novartis. J Snowden reports consulting fees from Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Medac Pharma, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, and participation in a Data Safety Monitoring Board in Kiadis Pharma. NW reports consulting and speakers fees from BMS Celgene, Kite Gilead, Miltenyi BioTec, Novartis, Piere Fabre and Therakos Mallinckrodt. The other authors report no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

In 2022, 46,143 HCT (19,011 (41.2%) allogeneic and 27,132 (58.8%) autologous) in 41,854 patients were reported by 689 European centers. 4329 patients received advanced cellular therapies, 3205 of which were CAR-T. An additional 2854 patients received DLI. Changes compared to the previous year were an increase in CAR-T treatments (+27%) and decrease in allogeneic (-4.0%) and autologous HCT (-1.7%). Main indications for allogeneic HCT were myeloid malignancies (10,433; 58.4%), lymphoid malignancies (4,674; 26.2%) and non-malignant disorders (2572; 14.4%). Main indications for autologous HCT were lymphomas (7897; 32.9%), PCD (13,694; 57.1%) and solid tumors (1593; 6.6%). In allogeneic HCT, use of sibling donors decreased by -7.7%, haploidentical donors by -6.3% and unrelated donors by -0.9%. Overall cord blood HCT decreased by -16.0%. Use of allogeneic, and to a lesser degree autologous HCT, decreased for lymphoid malignancies likely reflecting availability of new treatment modalities, including small molecules, bispecific antibodies, and CAR-T cells. Pediatric HCT activity remains stable (+0.3%) with differences between allogeneic and autologous HCT. Use of CAR-T continues to increase and reached a cumulative total of 9039 patients treated with wide differences across European countries. After many years of continuous growth, increase in application of HCT seems to have slowed down., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

A randomized study (acronym: MC-FludT.14/L Trial II) demonstrated that fludarabine plus treosulfan (30 g/m²) was an effective and well tolerated conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). To further evaluate this regimen, all 252 study patients aged 50 to 70 years were compared with similar patients, who underwent allo-HCT after fludarabine/melphalan (140 mg/m²) (FluMel) or busulfan (12.8 mg/kg)/cyclophosphamide (120 mg/kg) (BuCy) regimens and whose data was provided by the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry. In 1:1 propensity-score matched-paired analysis (PSA) of AML patients, there was no difference in 2-year-relapse-incidence after FluTreo compared with either FluMel (n = 110, p = 0.28) or BuCy (n = 78, p = 0.98). However, 2-year-non-relapse-mortality (NRM) was lower compared with FluMel (p = 0.019) and BuCy (p < 0.001). Consequently, 2-year-overall-survival (OS) after FluTreo was higher compared with FluMel (p = 0.04) and BuCy (p < 0.001). For MDS patients, no endpoint differences between FluTreo and FluMel (n = 30) were evident, whereas 2-year-OS after FluTreo was higher compared with BuCy (n = 25, p = 0.01) due to lower 2-year-NRM. Multivariate sensitivity analysis confirmed all significant results of PSA. Consequently, FluTreo (30 g/m²) seems to retain efficacy compared with FluMel and BuCy, but is better tolerated by older patients., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Aplastic anemia (AA) is the prototypical bone marrow failure syndrome. In the current era of readily available 'molecular annotation', application of comprehensive next-generation sequencing panels has generated novel insights into underlying pathogenetic mechanisms, potentially leading to improvements in personalized therapeutic approaches. New evidence has emerged as to the role of somatic loss of HLA class I allele expression in 'immune-mediated' AA, associated molecular aberrations, and risk of clonal evolution. A deeper understanding has emerged regarding the role of 'myeloid' gene mutations in this context, translating patho-mechanistic insights derived from wider clinical and translational research within the myeloid disorder arena. Here, we review contemporary 'tools' which aid in confirmation of a diagnosis of AA, with an additional focus on their potential in guiding therapeutic options. A specific emphasis is placed upon interpretation and integration of this detailed diagnostic information and how this may inform optimal transplantation strategies., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Systemic Mastocytosis (SM) is a multifaceted clinically heterogeneous disease. Advanced SM (AdvSM) comprises three entities: aggressive SM (ASM), mast cell leukaemia (MCL) and SM with an associated hematologic neoplasm (SM-AHN), the latter accounting for 60-70% of all AdvSM cases. Detection of a disease-triggering mutation in the KIT gene (esp. KIT D816V) in >90% of the patients with ASM or SM-AHN has led to a significant improvement in therapeutic options by the implementation of two KIT-targeting kinase inhibitors: midostaurin and avapritinib. Although complete remissions have been reported, neither of these targeted agents is 'curative' in all patients and the duration of responses varies. The median overall survival, depending on the WHO subtype and scoring result, is approximately 1 to 4 years. Although the European Competence Network on Mastocytosis (ECNM) and American Initiative in Mast Cell Diseases (AIM) consensus groups recommend allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in drug-resistant and other high-risk patients, there is a relative lack of information to guide clinicians on which patients with AdvSM should be considered for transplant, and how KIT inhibitors may fit into the transplant algorithm, including their use pre- and post-transplant to optimise outcomes. Following the generation of an expert panel with a specialist interest in allo-HCT and mastocytosis, these best practice recommendations were generated according to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Practice Harmonisation and guidelines and ECNM methodology. We aim to provide a practical, clinically relevant and up-to-date framework to guide allo-HCT in AdvsM in 2024 and beyond., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Bortezomib (Vel)- Melphalan 200 mg/m2 (Mel200) (Vel-Mel) has been utilised to intensify conditioning in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHCT) for multiple myeloma (MM). This EBMT registry-based study compared Vel-Mel with Mel200 during upfront AHCT. Between 2010 and 2017, MM patients who received Vel-Mel (n = 292) conditioning were compared with 4,096 Mel200 patients in the same 58 centres. Pre-AHCT, compared to Mel200 patients, Vel-Mel patients had similar International Staging System (ISS) scores and cytogenetic risk profiles; a similar proportion had received bortezomib-based induction (85% and 87.3%, respectively) though they were younger with a better performance status. Vel-Mel patients were more likely to achieve CR post-induction (40.6% vs 20.3%, p < 0.001) and by day 100 of AHCT (CR/VGPR: 70.2 % vs. 57.2%, p < 0.001). There was no difference in 3-year PFS (49% vs 46%, p = 0.06) or early post-AHCT mortality. In multivariable analysis, Vel-Mel associated with inferior PFS (HR: 1.69 (1.27-2.25, p < 0.001) and OS (HR:1.46 (1.14-1.86,p = 0.002), similar to negative effects on PFS of advanced ISS (HR:1.56 (1.33-1.83, p < 0.001), high-risk cytogenetics (HR:1.43(1.18-1.74, p < 0.001) and poor post-induction response(<=PR)(HR: 1.43(1.25-1.62, p < 0.001) Overall, despite superior pre- and post-AHCT responses, there was no improvement in PFS or OS following Vel-Mel. This data supports the findings of the smaller prospective IFM study., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

We retrospectively compared outcomes of 404 MDS patients undergoing 1st matched sibling donor allo-HCT receiving either PTCy-based (n = 66) or other "conventional prophylaxis" (n = 338; mostly calcineurin inhibitor + methotrexate or MMF). Baseline characteristics were balanced, except for higher use of myeloablative regimens in the PTCy group (52.3% vs. 38.2%, p = 0.047). Incidences of neutrophil (Day +28: 89% vs. 97%, p = 0.011) and platelet (Day +100: 89% vs. 97%, p < 0.001) engraftment were lower for PTCy-based. Day +100 cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and III-IV aGVHD, and 5-year CI of extensive cGVHD were 32%, 18% and 18% for PTCy-based and 25% (p = 0.3), 13% (p = 0.4) and 31% (p = 0.09) for the conventional cohort. Five-year OS (51% vs. 52%, p = 0.6) and GRFS (33% vs. 25%, p = 0.6) were similar between groups. Patients receiving PTCy had a trend to a lower cumulative incidence of relapse (20% vs. 33%, p = 0.06), not confirmed on multivariable analysis (p = 0.3). Although higher NRM rates were observed in patients receiving PTCy (32% vs. 21%, p = 0.02) on univariate analysis, this was not confirmed on multivariate analysis (HR 1.46, p = 0.18), and there was no resultant effect on OS (HR 1.20, p = 0.5). Based on these data, PTCy prophylaxis appears to be an attractive option for patients with MDS undergoing MSD allo-HCT., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN), either myelodysplastic neoplasms (t-MDS) or acute myeloid leukemias (t-AML), have a poor prognosis and allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) represents the only curative option. In this multicenter, registry-based study, we analyzed outcomes of 378 patients undergoing first allo-HCT between 2006-2017 for t-MN arising secondary to lymphoma treatment. Median age was 58 years at allo-HCT; 222 (59%) had a diagnosis of t-MDS and 156 (41%) of t-AML, respectively. At the time of allo-HCT, 46% of t-MN cases were reported as in complete remission (CR) and 15% of lymphomas were recorded as not in remission. A reduced intensity conditioning regimen was used in 70% of cases. For the entire cohort, 5-year OS, and t-MN PFS, relapse incidence and NRM were 32%, 28%, 35% and 37%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, undergoing allo-HCT with t-MN not in CR and older age were associated with significantly worse OS, PFS and NRM. At 5 years post allo-HCT, the relapse incidence of lymphoma was low at 3%, while the rate of secondary malignancies was 8%. This analysis shows the curative potential of allo-HCT for patients with t-MN arising secondary to lymphoma treatment in approximately a third of patients., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Background: Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are a group of disorders of clonal haemopoiesis associated with an inherent risk of arterial and venous thrombotic complications. The prevalence of thrombotic complications and the impact of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) in contemporary patient cohorts within the current era of MPN treatments have not been completely defined., Objectives: We aim to characterise the cardiovascular risk of patients with MPN by identifying the prevalence of CVRFs and describing the pattern of thrombotic events. We also aim to utilise the QRISK3 algorithm, which is a validated model used to estimate an individual's risk of developing cardiovascular disease, to further phenotype this cohort of patients., Methods: We perform a retrospective analysis on a single-centre cohort of 438 patients with MPN., Results: MPN patients continue to carry a high burden of vascular morbidity with a prevalence of arterial thrombotic events in 15.8 % (69/438) and venous thrombotic events in 13.2 % (58/438) of the cohort. The novel use of the QRISK3 algorithm, which showed a mean score of 13.7 % across the MPN population, provides further evidence to suggest an increased cardiovascular risk in MPN patients., Conclusion: With an increased risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with MPN, we propose an integrated approach between primary and specialised healthcare services using risk stratification tools such as QRISK3, which will allow aggressive optimisation of CVRFs to prevent thrombosis and reduce the overall morbidity and mortality in patients with MPN., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Bone marrow fibrosis (BMF) is a pathological feature of myelofibrosis, with higher grades associated with poor prognosis. Limited data exist on the association between outcomes and BMF changes. We present BMF data from Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor-naive patients from SIMPLIFY-1 (NCT01969838), a double-blind, randomized, phase 3 study of momelotinib vs ruxolitinib. Baseline and week 24 bone marrow biopsies were graded from 0 to 3 as per World Health Organization criteria. Other assessments included Total Symptom Score, spleen volume, transfusion independence status, and hemoglobin levels. Paired samples were available from 144 and 160 patients randomized to momelotinib and ruxolitinib. With momelotinib and ruxolitinib, transfusion independence was achieved by 87% and 44% of patients with BMF improvement of ≥1 grade and 76% and 56% of those with stable/worsening BMF; there was no association between BMF changes and transfusion independence for either arm (momelotinib, p  = .350; ruxolitinib, p  = .096). Regardless of BMF changes, hemoglobin levels also generally increased on momelotinib but decreased on ruxolitinib. In addition, no associations between BMF changes and spleen (momelotinib, p  = .126; ruxolitinib, p  = .407)/symptom (momelotinib, p  = .617; ruxolitinib, p  = .833) outcomes were noted, and no improvement in overall survival was observed with ≥1-grade BMF improvement (momelotinib, p  = .395; ruxolitinib, p  = .407). These data suggest that the anemia benefit of momelotinib is not linked to BMF changes, and question the use of BMF assessment as a surrogate marker for clinical benefit with JAK inhibitors., Competing Interests: Stephen T. Oh reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Blueprint Medicines, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Constellation Pharmaceuticals, CTI BioPharma, Disc Medicine, Incyte, Kartos Therapeutics, PharmaEssentia, and Sierra Oncology. Srdan Verstovsek reports consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Incyte, Novartis, and Sierra Oncology and research funding from AstraZeneca, Blueprint Medicines, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, CTI BioPharma, Genentech, Gilead, Incyte, Italfarmaco, Novartis, NS Pharma, PharmaEssentia, and Promedior. Vikas Gupta reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Constellation Biopharma, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sierra Oncology; honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Constellation Biopharma, and Novartis; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Pfizer, and Roche. Uwe Platzbecker reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Janssen, and Novartis; honoraria from Amgen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Takeda; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisor board for AbbVie and Novartis. Timothy Devos reports consulting fees from AOP Health, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Incyte, and MorphoSys and honoraria from Novartis and Sobi. Jean‐Jacques Kiladjian reports honoraria from Novartis and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AbbVie, AOP Orphan, Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, and Novartis. Donal P. McLornan reports grants or contracts from CPI and honoraria from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis. Andrew Perkins reports honoraria from AbbVie, Novartis, CTI BioPharma, Sierra Oncology, and Kartos Therapeutics. Maria Laura Fox reports consulting fees from AbbVie, GSK, Novartis, and Sierra Oncology; payment or honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb and Novartis; and travel support from AbbVie. Mary Frances McMullin reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, CTI, Novartis, and Sierra Oncology and honoraria from AbbVie, AOP, Incyte, Novartis, and Pfizer. Adam J. Mead reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Galecto, Gilead, Incyte, Karyopharm, Novartis, Pfizer, Sensyn, and Sierra Oncology; travel fees from Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene. Jiri Mayer reports research support from Sierra Oncology. Tomasz Sacha reports honoraria from Angelini Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. Jun Kawashima reports employment at Sierra Oncology and stock or stock options at Gilead Sciences and Sierra Oncology. Mei Huang reports employment and stock options at Sierra Oncology. Bryan Strouse reports employment at Sierra Oncology. Ruben Mesa reports grants or contracts from AbbVie, Celgene, CTI Biopharma, Constellation Biopharma, Genotech, Incyte, Promedior, Samus Therapeutics, and the Mays Cancer Center P30 Cancer Center Support Grant from the National Cancer Institute (CA054174) and consulting fees from Constellation Biopharma, La Jolla, Novartis, and Sierra Oncology. Miklos Egyed declares no conflict of interest., (© 2024 The Authors. eJHaem published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Although CMML since long has been separated from MDS, many studies continue to evaluate the outcomes of both diseases after hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) together. Data evaluating outcomes of a large CMML cohort after allo-HCT compared to MDS are limited. We aim to compare outcomes of CMML to MDS patients who underwent allo-HCT between 2010 and 2018. Patients ≥18 years with CMML and MDS undergoing allo-HCT reported to the EBMT registry were analyzed. Progression to AML before allo-HCT was an exclusion criterion. Overall survival (OS), progression/relapse-free survival (PFS), relapse incidence (including progression) (REL), and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were evaluated in univariable and multivariable (MVA) Cox proportional hazard models including interaction terms between disease and confounders. In total, 10832 patients who underwent allo-HCT were included in the study, there were a total of 1466 CMML, and 9366 MDS. The median age at time of allo-HCT in CMML (median 60.5, IQR 54.3-65.2 years) was significantly higher than in the MDS cohort (median 58.8, IQR 50.2-64.5 years; p < .001). A significantly higher percentage of CMML patients were male (69.4%) compared to MDS (61.2%; p < .001). There were no clinically meaningful differences in the distribution of Karnofsky score, Sorror HCT-CI score at allo-HCT, and donor type, between the CMML and MDS patients. RIC platforms were utilized in 63.9% of CMML allo-HCT, and in 61.4% of MDS patients (p = .08). In univariable analyses, we found that OS, PFS, and REL were significantly worse in CMML when compared with MDS (all p < .0001), whereas no significant difference was observed in NRM (p = .77). In multivariable analyses, the HR comparing MDS versus CMML for OS was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.74-0.88, p < .001), PFS 0.76 (95% CI 0.70-0.82, p < .001), relapse 0.66 (95% CI 0.59-0.74, p < .001), and NRM 0.87 (95% CI 0.78-0.98, p = .02), respectively. The association between baseline variables and outcome was found to be similar in MDS and CMML (all interaction p > .05) except for a decreasing trend over time of the risk of relapse in CMML (HR allo-HCT per year later 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.98), whereas no such trend was observed in MDS (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.98-1.02). The poor outcome observed for CMML could be related to variables not measured in this study or to factors inherent to the disease itself. This study demonstrates that outcomes of CMML patients after allo-HCT are significantly worse compared to MDS. The results of this study may contribute to future recommendations for allo-HCT in CMML patients., (© 2023 The Authors. American Journal of Hematology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

The optimal conditioning for patients with higher risk MDS receiving potentially curative allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant(allo-HCT) remains to be defined. This is particularly the case for patients with excess of blasts at time of allo-HCT. Sequential (Seq) conditioning, whereby chemotherapy is followed rapidly by transplant conditioning, offers an opportunity to decrease disease burden, potentially improving outcomes allo-HCT outcomes. Herein we present the only analysis comparing Seq to myeloablative (MAC) and reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) specifically focussed on MDS patients with excess of blasts at allo-HCT. 303 patients were identified in the EBMT registry, receiving RIC (n = 158), Seq (n = 105), and MAC (n = 40). Median follow-up was 67.2 months and median age at allo-HCT was 59.5 years (IQR 53.5-65.6). For the entire cohort, 3 y overall survival (OS) was 50% (95% CI 45-56%) and relapse free survival (RFS) 45% (95% CI 40-51%). No significant differences in OS (log-rank p = 0.13) and RFS (log-rank p = 0.18) were observed between conditioning protocols. On multivariable analysis, lower performance status, worse IPSS-R cytogenetics, sibling donor (compared to 8/8 MUD) and ≥20% blasts at allo-HCT were associated with worse outcomes. In conclusion, the Seq protocol did little to influence the outcome in this high-risk group of patients, with outcomes mostly determined by baseline disease risk and patient characteristics such as performance status., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Abstract: Nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) in ruxolitinib-treated patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms behave aggressively, with adverse features and high recurrence. In our cohort, mortality from metastatic NMSC exceeded that from myelofibrosis. Vigilant skin assessment, counseling on NMSC risks, and prospective ruxolitinib-NMSC studies are crucial., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

New options for medical therapy and risk scoring systems containing molecular data are leading to increased complexity in the management of patients with myelofibrosis. To inform patients' optimal care, we updated the 2015 guidelines on indications for and management of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) with the support of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and European LeukemiaNet (ELN). New recommendations were produced using a consensus-building methodology after a comprehensive review of articles released from January, 2015 to December, 2022. Seven domains and 18 key questions were selected through a series of questionnaires using a Delphi process. Key recommendations in this update include: patients with primary myelofibrosis and an intermediate-2 or high-risk Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System score, or a high-risk Mutation-Enhanced International Prognostic Score Systems (MIPSS70 or MIPSS70-plus) score, or a low-risk or intermediate-risk Myelofibrosis Transplant Scoring System score should be considered candidates for allogeneic HSCT. All patients who are candidates for allogeneic HSCT with splenomegaly greater than 5 cm below the left costal margin or splenomegaly-related symptoms should receive a spleen-directed treatment, ideally with a JAK-inhibitor; HLA-matched sibling donors remain the preferred donor source to date. Reduced intensity conditioning and myeloablative conditioning are both valid options for patients with myelofibrosis. Regular post-transplantation driver mutation monitoring is recommended to detect and treat early relapse with donor lymphocyte infusion. In a disease where evidence-based guidance is scarce, these recommendations might help clinicians and patients in shared decision making., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests NK has received honoraria for lectures and advisory boards from Kite, Jazz, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Neovii Biotech, Alexion, Takeda, Novartis, Riemser, Pfizer, and Bristol Myers Squibb. NK has also received research support from Neovii, Riemser, Novartis, and Deutsche Knochenmarkspender Datei, and research grants from Neovii, Jazz, Celgene, and Novartis. AMV has received honoraria for lectures from Novartis, Incyte, AbbVie, GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol Myers Squibb, and AOP Orphan Pharmaceutical GmbH. CH has received honoraria for lectures from AbbVie, AOP Orphan Pharmaceutical GmbH, Bristol Myers Squibb, CTIBioPharma, Imago Biosciences, Incyte, Novartis, Galacteo, Geron, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Keros, Promedior, Roche, Shire, and Sierra. SK has received grants or contracts from AOP Orphan Pharmaceutical GmbH, Janssen, Geron, and Novartis. SK has received consulting fees from Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, AOP Orphan Pharmaceutical GmbH, Baxalta, CTI Biopharma, Pfizer, Sanofi, Celgene, Shire, Janssen, Geron, Karthos, Sierra Oncology, GlaxoSmithKline, Imago Biosciences, AbbVie, and iOMEDICO. SK has received honoraria for lectures from Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Incyte, Ariad, Shire, Roche, AOP Orphan Pharmaceutical GmbH, Janssen, Geron, Celgene, Karthos, Abbvie, iOMEDICO, and GlaxoSmithKline. SK has received payment for expert testimony from Novartis and GlaxoSmithKline. SK has received funding for travel from Alexion, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Incyte, Ariad, AOP Orphan Pharmaceutical GmbH, CTI Biopharma, Pfizer, Sanofi, Janssen, Geron, Imago Biosciences, GlaxoSmithKline, PharmaEssentia, Sierra Oncology, AbbVie, and iOMEDICO. SK has a patent for bromodomain and extra-terminal motif inhibitors related to RWTH Aachen University (Aachen, Germany). SK has received honoraria for participation on data safety monitoring boards and advisory boards from Pfizer, Incyte, Novartis, AOP Orphan Pharmaceutical GmbH, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Geron, Janssen, CTI Biopharma, Roche, Baxalta, Sanofi, Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Hub, Sierra Oncology, GlaxoSmith Kline, AbbVie, and PharmaEssentia. SK is chairman of the Hemostasis Working Party of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology, speaker of the German Study Group of the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Hub, member of the Guidelines Committee of European Haematology Association, and an associate editor for the Hemasphere journal. DPM has received honoraria for lectures from GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, and AbbVie. TJ has received grants from CTI Biopharma, Kartos Therapeutics, and Incyte. TJ has received honoraria for participation on advisory boards from Care Dx, Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Abbvie, CTI Biopharma, Kite, Cogent Biosciences, Blueprint Medicine, Telios Pharma, and Protagonist Therapeutics. NH has received honoraria for lectures from Novartis. AR has received honoraria for lectures from Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Abbvie, Amgen, Pfizer, Kite-Gilead, Jazz, Astellas, Incyte, and Omeros. MG has received honoraria for lectures from AOP Orphan Pharmaceutical GmbH, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie, Pfizer, Janssen, Gilead, AstraZeneca, Lilly, and GlaxoSmithKline. VG has received grants from Novartis and Incyte. VG has received consulting fees from Novartis, Incyte, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, CTI Biopharma, Morphosys, AbbVie, and Pfizer. VG has received honoraria for lectures from GlaxoSmithKline. VG has received funding for travel and registration fees from GlaxoSmithKline. VG is a member of the Executive Committee of the Canadian Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Group. NP has received honoraria for lectures from Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Abbvie. NP has received funding for travel and registrations fees from Abbvie and Novartis. NP has received honoraria for participation on advisory boards from Novartis and Abbvie. JM has received grants from Incyte, Novartis, Roche, CTI Biopharma, Geron, Kartos, Karyopharm, PharmaEssentia, AbbVie, and Bristol Myers Squibb. JM has received consulting fees from Incyte, Novartis, CTI Biopharma, Geron, Kartos, Karyopharm, Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie, PharmaEssentia, Galecto, Imago, Merck, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, and MorphoSys. MD has received honoraria for lectures from Pfizer, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Novartis. MD has received funding for travel and registration fees from Biotest. FP has received honoraria for lectures from Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Abbvie, AOP Orphan Pharmaceutical GmbH, and Janssen. FP has received honoraria for participation on advisory boards from Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Abbvie, AOP Orphan Pharmaceutical GmbH, Janssen, Karyiopharma, Kyowa Kirin and MEI, Sumitomo, and Kartos. TB has received honoraria for lectures from AOP Orphan Pharmaceutical GmbH, Novartis, and Pharma Essentia. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The recent application of whole exome or whole genome sequencing unveiled a plethora of germline variants predisposing to myeloid disorders, particularly myelodysplastic neoplasms. The presence of such variants in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes has important clinical repercussions for haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, from donor selection and conditioning regimen to graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis and genetic counselling for relatives. No international guidelines exist to harmonise management approaches to this particular clinical scenario. Moreover, the application of germline testing, and how this informs clinical decisions, differs according to the expertise of individual clinical practices and according to different countries, health-care systems, and legislations. Leveraging the global span of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) network, we took a snapshot of the current European situation on these matters by disseminating an electronic survey to EBMT centres experienced in myelodysplastic syndromes transplantation. An international group of haematologists, transplantation physicians, paediatricians, nurses, and experts in molecular biology and constitutional genetics with experience in myelodysplastic syndromes contributed to this Position Paper. The panel met during multiple online meetings to discuss the results of the EBMT survey and to establish suggested harmonised guidelines for such clinical situations, which are presented here., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests YC has received consulting fees for advisory board from MSD, Novartis, Incyte, BMS, Pfizer, Abbvie, Roche, Jazz, Gilead, Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, and Servier and travel support from MSD, Roche, Gilead, Amgen, Incyte, Abbvie, Janssen, Astra-Zeneca, Jazz, and Sanofi all to his institution. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is curative for myelofibrosis (MF) but assessing risk-benefit in individual patients is challenging. This complexity is amplified in CALR-mutated MF patients, as they live longer with conventional treatments compared to other molecular subtypes. We analyzed outcomes of 346 CALR-mutated MF patients who underwent allo-HCT in 123 EBMT centers between 2005 and 2019. After a median follow-up of 40 months, the estimated overall survival (OS) rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 81%, 71%, and 63%, respectively. Patients receiving busulfan-containing regimens achieved a 5-year OS rate of 71%. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 1, 3, and 5 years was 16%, 22%, and 26%, respectively, while the incidence of relapse/progression was 11%, 15%, and 17%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that older age correlated with worse OS, while primary MF and HLA mismatched transplants had a near-to-significant trend to decreased OS. Comparative analysis between CALR- and JAK2-mutated MF patients adjusting for confounding factors revealed better OS, lower NRM, lower relapse, and improved graft-versus-host disease-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS) in CALR-mutated patients. These findings confirm the improved prognosis associated with CALR mutation in allo-HCT and support molecular profiling in prognostic scoring systems to predict OS after transplantation in MF., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the sole curative option for myelofibrosis (MF). Relapse remains a significant problem, however, occurring in up to 20% to 30% of cases. Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) represents a potentially effective strategy for relapse prevention and management, but the optimal timing based on measurable residual disease/chimerism analyses and the choice of regimen remain undetermined. We performed a retrospective real-world analysis of a multicenter cohort of MF allo-HCT recipients from 8 European transplantation centers who received DLI between 2005 and 2022. Response was assessed using International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment-defined response criteria, and survival endpoints were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and log-rank test. The study included 28 patients with a median age of 58 years and a Karnofsky Performance Status of >80. The majority of patients had Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System-plus intermediate-2 or high-risk disease at the time of allo-HCT. In vivo T cell depletion was used in 20 patients (71.2%), with 19 of the 20 receiving antithymocyte globulin. The indication for DLI was either "preemptive" (n = 15), due to a decrease in recipient chimerism (n = 13) or molecular relapse (n = 2), or "therapeutic" (n = 13) for clinician-defined hematologic/clinical relapse. No patient received DLI prophylactically. The median time of DLI administration was 23.4 months post allo-HCT. Of the 16 patients receiving multiple DLIs, 12 were part of a planned escalating dose regimen. The median follow-up from the time of first DLI was 55.4 months. The responses to DLI were complete response in 9 patients, partial response in 1 patient, and clinical improvement in 6 patients. Chimerism levels improved in 16 patients, and stable disease was reported in 5 patients. No response or progression was reported in 7 patients. DLI-induced acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) was reported in 11 patients (39%), with grade III-IV aGVHD in 7 (25%). The median overall survival from the time of first DLI was 62.6 months, and the cumulative incidence of relapse/progression after first DLI was 30.8% at 6 months. This study highlights that good response rates can be achieved with DLI even after frank relapse in some patients in a cohort in which other treatment options are very limited. More prospective studies are warranted to identify the optimal DLI regimen and timing to improve patient outcomes., (Copyright © 2023 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm that typically manifests with debilitating symptoms that progressively worsen, negatively impacting patients' quality of life. Fatigue is a multifactorial and burdensome MF-related symptom due to its severity, persistence, and prevalence, with anemia a contributing factor and major unmet need. Clinical trials of the Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2/activin A receptor type 1 inhibitor momelotinib have shown consistent anemia benefits, in addition to improvements in MF-related symptoms. The phase 3 MOMENTUM trial in symptomatic and anemic patients met its primary end point, with a greater proportion having a Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) Total Symptom Score (TSS) reduction ≥50% at week 24 with momelotinib versus danazol. To support the positive primary end point result, we conducted longitudinal, responder, and time-to-event analyses of patient-reported outcomes from MOMENTUM, as measured by the MFSAF, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) assessments. These analyses demonstrated rapid and durable response benefits with momelotinib, with achievement of first TSS response by day 29 and continued improvement over time. Improvements favored momelotinib versus danazol for each MFSAF individual item, and greater improvements were observed for disease- and cancer-related fatigue and physical functioning at week 24, with significant results for multiple items/domains across the 3 assessments. These findings are consistent in demonstrating that momelotinib provides substantial symptom benefit., Competing Interests: RAM has consulted and received honoraria from Novartis, Sierra Oncology, Gentech, Blueprint, Geron, Telios, CTI, Incyte, BMS, AbbVie, GSK and Morphosys. CH has consulted for Galecto DISC and Keros and received compensation; received honoraria from Novartis, CTI, BMS, Sierra, and GSK; participated on an Ad Board for AOP, Telios, Sumitomo, and Keros; and had a leadership role in EHA, HemaSphere, and MPN Voice. VG has consulted for Novartis, BMS Celgene, Sierra Oncology, AbbVie, Constellation Biopharma, Pfizer, GSK Pharma, and CTI Biopharma and received compensation; received honoraria from Novartis and BMS Celgene; and received compensation for participation on an Ad Board for BMS Celgene, Roche, AbbVie, Pfizer, Sierra Oncology, and CTI Biopharma. DPM received a research grant from Imago Biosciences; received honoraria from JAZZ Pharma, AbbVie, and Novartis; participated in the UK ALL RIC TRIAL – DSM board and is an EBMT Scientific Council Member Chair of the EBMT CMWP. MFM received honoraria from Novartis, Abbvie, and AOP; and received compensation for participation on an Ad Board from Novartis, BMS, AbbVie, CTI, Sierra Oncology, and GSK. J-JK received compensation and participated in Ad Boards for Novartis, AbbVie, BMS, GSK, Incyte, and AOP Health. LF received honoraria from Novartis and BMS and participated in Ad Boards for Incyte and GS. MLF has consulted for Novartis, GSK, AbbVie, and Sierra Oncology and received compensation; and received honoraria from Novartis and BMS and attended meetings for AbbVie. DMR has consulted for Keros, and the institution received compensation; received honoraria from Novartis personally and to the institution; received compensation from Novartis to attend a meeting; received compensation to the institution for participation on an Ad Board from Novartis, Menarini, and Takeda. STO has consulted for AbbVie, Constellation, CTI BioPharma, BMS, Geron, Sierra Oncology, Cogent, Protagonist, and Incyte and received compensation. JK owned stock in Sierra Oncology and owns stock in Gilead. SR and RD owned stock in Sierra Oncology. SD is an employee at Sierra Oncology. BG received compensation from GSK for attending meetings and owns stock in GSK. SV received compensation for participation on an Ad Board. UP received honoraria and research support from Geron, GSK, Novartis, Abbvie, and Curis. JMP received honoraria to the institution from CTI; and received compensation to the institution for participation in an Ad Board for Morphosys. AJM received support from Abbvie for the present article; received grants or contracts from Celgene/BMS; received royalties or licenses from Alethiomics; received consulting fees from Celgene/BMS paid to the Sierra Oncology, Novartis paid to Karyopharm, Abbvie paid to Sensyn, and CTI paid to Incyte, Galecto, Pfizer, and Gilead; received honoraria from Celgene/BMS, Novartis, and Abbvie; received support to attend meetings from Celgene/BMS and Novartis; and participated on an Ad Board for Celgene/BMS and Abbvie. All authors received medical writing support for this article funded by Sierra Oncology, a GSK company. All the other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the European Hematology Association.)

Management approaches for accelerated and blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasms remain challenging for clinicians and patients alike. Despite many therapeutic advances, outcomes for those patients who are not allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplant eligible remain, in general, very poor. Estimated survival rates for such blast phase patients is frequently reported as less than 6 months. No specific immunological, genomic or clinicopathological signature currently exists that accurately predicts the risk and timing of transformation, which frequently induces a high degree of anxiety among patients and clinicians alike. Within this review article, we provide an up-to-date summary of current understanding of the underlying pathogenesis of accelerated and blast phase disease and discuss current therapeutic approaches and realistic outcomes. Finally, we discuss how the horizon may look with the introduction of more novel agents into the clinical arena., (© 2023 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

To develop a prognostic model for patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for myelofibrosis (MF), we examined the data of 623 patients undergoing allo-HCT between 2000 and 2016 in the United States (the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research [CIBMTR] cohort). A Cox multivariable model was used to identify factors prognostic of mortality. A weighted score using these factors was assigned to patients who received transplantation in Europe (the European Bone Marrow Transplant [EBMT] cohort; n = 623). Patient age >50 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-1.96), and HLA-matched unrelated donor (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.98-1.7) were associated with an increased hazard of death and were assigned 1 point. Hemoglobin levels <100 g/L at time of transplantation (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.2-2.19) and a mismatched unrelated donor (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.25-2.52) were assigned 2 points. The 3-year overall survival (OS) in patients with a low (1-2 points), intermediate (3-4 points), and high score (5 points) were 69% (95% CI, 61-76), 51% (95% CI, 46-56.4), and 34% (95% CI, 21-49), respectively (P < .001). Increasing score was predictive of increased transplant-related mortality (TRM; P = .0017) but not of relapse (P = .12). The derived score was predictive of OS (P < .001) and TRM (P = .002) but not of relapse (P = .17) in the EBMT cohort as well. The proposed system was prognostic of survival in 2 large cohorts, CIBMTR and EBMT, and can easily be applied by clinicians consulting patients with MF about the transplantation outcomes., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Early relapse (ER) following Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (AHCT) confers a poor prognosis. We therefore developed a novel scoring system to predict ER. A total of 14,367 AHCT-1 patients were transplanted between 2014 and 2019, and were conditioned with Melphalan 200 mg/m 2 (Mel200) (n = 7228; 2014-2017) (training cohort); Mel200 (n = 5616; 2018-2019) or Mel140 (n = 1523; 2018-2019) (validation cohorts). PFS-12 and the Cumulative Incidence of Relapse at 12 months were 84.1% and 14.7% (training Mel200), 87.2% and 11.6% (validation Mel200), and 80.3% and 16.9% (validation Mel140), respectively. The points in the risk score were: 0, 1,2 for ISS stages I, II, and III; Disease status: 0 (CR/VGPR); 1 (PR); 2 (SD/MR); 4 (Relapse/Progression); and 1 for Karnofsky ≤ 70. The distribution of scores: 0 (24%), 1 (33.9%), 2 (29.6 %), 3 (9.5%), and ≥4 (2.7%). The score separated PFS-12, with the lowest risk group (n = 1752) having a PFS-12 of 91.7% and the highest risk group (n = 195) 57.1%. This also applied in cytogenetically high-risk patients. If the pre-score baseline risks are 15% (standard risk) and 25% (high-risk), a score of ≥4 confers calculated risks of 38% and 54%, respectively. This novel EBMT ER score, therefore, allows for the identification of five discrete prognostic groups., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)