Search

The interaction of evolutionary processes to determine quantitative genetic variation has implications for contemporary and future phenotypic evolution, as well as for our ability to detect causal genetic variants. While theoretical studies have provided robust predictions to discriminate among competing models, empirical assessment of these has been limited. In particular, theory highlights the importance of pleiotropy in resolving observations of selection and mutation, but empirical investigations have typically been limited to few traits. Here, we applied high-dimensional Bayesian Sparse Factor Genetic modeling to gene expression datasets in 2 species, Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila serrata, to explore the distributions of genetic variance across high-dimensional phenotypic space. Surprisingly, most of the heritable trait covariation was due to few lines (genotypes) with extreme [>3 interquartile ranges (IQR) from the median] values. Intriguingly, while genotypes extreme for a multivariate factor also tended to have a higher proportion of individual traits that were extreme, we also observed genotypes that were extreme for multivariate factors but not for any individual trait. We observed other consistent differences between heritable multivariate factors with outlier lines vs those factors without extreme values, including differences in gene functions. We use these observations to identify further data required to advance our understanding of the evolutionary dynamics and nature of standing genetic variation for quantitative traits.

The impact of selection on host immune function genes has been widely documented. However, it remains essentially unknown how mutation influences the quantitative immune traits that selection acts on. Applying a classical mutation accumulation (MA) experimental design in Drosophila serrata , we found the mutational variation in susceptibility (median time of death, LT50) to Drosophila C virus (DCV) was of similar magnitude to that reported for intrinsic survival traits. Mean LT50 did not change as mutations accumulated, suggesting no directional bias in mutational effects. Maintenance of genetic variance in immune function is hypothesized to be influenced by pleiotropic effects on immunity and other traits that contribute to fitness. To investigate this, we assayed female reproductive output for a subset of MA lines with relatively long or short survival times under DCV infection. Longer survival time tended to be associated with lower reproductive output, suggesting that mutations affecting susceptibility to DCV had pleiotropic effects on investment in reproductive fitness. Further studies are needed to uncover the general patterns of mutational effect on immune responses and other fitness traits, and to determine how selection might typically act on new mutations via their direct and pleiotropic effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There are essentially an infinite number of traits that could be measured on any organism, and almost all individual traits display genetic variation, yet substantial genetic variance in a large number of independent traits is not plausible under basic models of selection and mutation. One mechanism that may be invoked to explain the observed levels of genetic variance in individual traits is that pleiotropy results in fewer dimensions of phenotypic space with substantial genetic variance. Multivariate genetic analyses of small sets of functionally related traits have shown that standing genetic variance is often concentrated in relatively few dimensions. It is unknown if a similar concentration of genetic variance occurs at a phenome-wide scale when many traits of disparate function are considered, or if the genetic variance generated by new mutations is also unevenly distributed across phenotypic space. Here, we used a Bayesian sparse factor model to characterize the distribution of mutational variance of 3385 gene expression traits of Drosophila serrata after 27 generations of mutation accumulation, and found that 46% of the estimated mutational variance was concentrated in just 21 dimensions with significant mutational heritability. We show that the extent of concentration of mutational variance into such a small subspace has the potential to substantially bias the response to selection of these traits.