Search

Vaccines continue to play a central role in our ability to prevent disease, save lives, and improve health. The scientific community, including our own researchers, are driven by a shared purpose to improve vaccine technologies and bring the benefits of immunization to everyone, regardless of where they live – as soon as possible, especially when the medical need is considerable. Vaccine developers and manufacturers (sometimes referred to as "study sponsors" or "applicants") are exploring technological advancements to translate breakthrough discoveries into novel vaccines which have the potential to provide protection from life-threatening and debilitating infectious diseases. Developing new vaccines is a lengthy process regulated by guidance provided by independent organizations, National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs) and the World Health Organization. As most infectious diseases can span a considerable area of the world, clinical trials are often conducted across different countries and regions. Regulatory requirements for clinical trials (both Chemistry Manufacturing & Controls – CMC, nonclinical and clinical) vary significantly between the different countries and regions adding to the complexity of vaccine development and leading to significant delays in the development of novel vaccines and ultimately equitable access for populations to these innovations. Without progress in terms of regulatory convergence and harmonization the benefits from these scientific advancements will not be fully realized. There is an urgent need by global bodies such as WHO to partner with and the NRAs to establish and implement. 1. a common, global set of requirements for Clinical Trial Application (CTAs) per Phase of Development. 2. a parallel ethical committee and regulatory authority review rather than sequential reviews. 3. clear and transparent assessment timelines and commitment to these timelines. 4. a focus on reduced regulatory burden overall for NRAs, Ethics Committees (ECs) and vaccine developers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vaccines are complex and a very diverse group of products with relatively long product lifecycles. The manufacturing programs for these vaccines need to be continually updated to comply with evolving regulatory expectations. Members of the Parenteral Drug Association (PDA) Vaccines Interest Group (VIG) authored and published PDA Technical Report No. 89 Strategies for Vaccine Development and Lifecycle Management (TR 89) which seeks to provide context to vaccine developers and manufacturers regarding key aspects of new or legacy vaccines such as control strategy from process development to vaccine lifecycle management, comparability and lifecycle management including technical, validation, quality and regulatory perspectives. To further explain and illustrate the concepts and topics discussed, seven relevant situations were selected as either case studies associated with changes implemented or proposed process development strategies, which are discussed in this article. The situations described are: working cell bank, modification or update of externally supplied product contact components for vaccine manufacturing, raw material change, new product at an existing site, vaccine development acceleration by leveraging existing platforms, selection and implementation of potency method, and modeling for stability forecast prediction. For each situation, the applicable key concepts from TR#89 are discussed as follows: Control Strategy, Prior Knowledge, Relying on PQS, Classification of Parameters, Validation Approach, Use of a Risk-based Approach, Comparability, Use of ICHQ12 and Additional Regulatory Considerations., (Copyright © 2024, Parenteral Drug Association.)