Search

Aim: To explore the chef's experience with a newly implemented indoor hospital-based kitchen garden designed to supplement herbs ordered for patient meals and improve staff engagement. Background: Hospital-based therapeutic and kitchen gardens have emerged as effective health-promoting tools in hospital healthcare environments. They promote emotional, mental, and physical well-being for patients, visitors, and staff. However, formal evaluations are limited, and studies focusing on indoor hospital kitchen gardens are noticeably absent in the literature. Methods: Qualitative evaluation of a hospital-based kitchen garden. Open-ended interviews were conducted approximately 6 months after garden implementation and explored key informants (n = 6) overall experience, engagement with the garden, perceived benefits, and opportunities for improvement. Interview data was analyzed using a thematic approach. Results: The implementation of the kitchen gardens was met with overall acceptance among staff. However, the project's feasibility faced challenges related to local food service leadership, communication, and certain aspects of the garden setup. Despite these obstacles, the gardens contributed positively to the quality of meals by including fresh herbs and fostering greater staff engagement. Conclusions: The chefs viewed the concept of the hospital-based kitchen garden favorably, noting that it closely aligned with their mission of providing nutritious meals to patients. However, consideration of the broader issues facing hospital food services may be required to seamlessly integrate this task into the kitchen staff's daily routine. Further research is warranted to investigate the effective implementation and feasibility of indoor kitchen gardens in hospitals and their impact on patient menus, food service staff, and the workforce. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In community and school settings, gardens and garden interventions have been shown to confer several psychosocial, physiological, and nutritional benefits. However, little is known about the implementation and impact of health care gardens on patients, visitors, and staff health and well-being. The primary aim of this review is to identify and describe the types of gardens and common design elements implemented in health care settings and the impact these gardens have on the health and well-being of patients, visitors, and staff. A secondary aim is to assess the quality of available evidence. Methods: PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO were systematically searched on October 28, 2022. Primary qualitative and quantitative studies (excluding case reports and studies) were eligible for inclusion if they described the types of gardens and common design elements implemented in health care settings (hospitals, aged care, rehabilitation facilities, and medical centers) and/or assessed the impact of garden interventions on the health and well-being of patients, visitors, and staff. Review, selection, and data extraction were conducted by two independent researchers, with findings synthesized and presented in narrative form. Articles were critically appraised using the mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT). Results: Eighteen articles were included. Eight studies provided detailed descriptions of the types of gardens implemented in health care settings (healing [n = 3], therapeutic [n = 2], sensory [n = 2], children's fairy gardens [n = 1], and enriched [n = 1] gardens). Studies examining the psychosocial impacts of gardens were most frequently reported (n = 16), followed by physical (n = 4) and nutritional (n = 2). A wide range of positive outcomes, predominantly relating to patients (n = 12), were reported, including improvements in stress, quality of life (QOL), cognitive function, physical activity, and fruit and vegetable intake. The evidence was heterogeneous and low-medium quality. Conclusions: The findings suggest that implementing gardens and garden interventions in health care settings may positively impact the health and well-being of patients, visitors, and staff. Most studies related to the impact of gardens on patients' mental health and QOL, indicating the need for further research to explore physical and nutritional outcomes, as well as health outcomes of staff and visitors. Findings also suggest the need for high-quality study designs (e.g., cluster control trials) and standardized measurement tools. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate and compare patient foodservice (FS) satisfaction using a validated tool and consistent methodology in an acute health service for four different FS models as the organisation transitioned through traditional model (TM), choice at point of service (CaPOS), bedside menu ordering systems (BMOS) and room service (RS) from 2013 to 2016. Methods: Patient satisfaction data were collected using the Acute Care Hospital Foodservice Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire. For the purposes of this study, patients' rating of their overall experience with FS (very good, good, okay, poor or very poor) was compared for each site and model. Results: Satisfaction was significantly higher in the CaPOS and RS models compared with TM. BMOS, although somewhat higher, was not shown to be significantly higher than TM. The RS model was significantly higher than BMOS, but there was no significant difference observed between RS and CaPOS. Conclusion: FS models that support patient flexibility and meal ordering closer to the meal delivery time (as seen with RS and CaPOS) show higher patient satisfaction among hospital patients. It is recommended that sites consistently opt to include patient satisfaction as part of routine auditing. This would enable clear conclusions to be drawn regarding best practice FS models, based on specific and individual hospital requirements. Key points: Foodservice models that support patient flexibility and meal ordering closer to the meal delivery time show higher patient satisfaction among hospital patients. Results demonstrate the need for consistent methodology in the routine auditing of patient satisfaction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Room service is a patient‐focused foodservice model gaining interest in Australian hospitals following demonstrated patient and organisational benefits. This study aimed to compare nutritional intake, waste, patient satisfaction, meal costs and meal quality between a bought‐in, thaw‐retherm foodservice model and a cook‐fresh, on‐demand room service model at a large tertiary public hospital. Methods: A retrospective analysis of quality assurance data compared thaw‐retherm to room service. Nutritional intake and plate waste were measured using a visual intake analysis tool; production waste was measured using weighted analysis methodology; patient satisfaction was measured using a validated patient satisfaction survey; meal quality was assessed using a validated meal quality audit tool, and meal costs were obtained from hospital finance reports. Independent sample t‐tests or nonparametric equivalent (Mann‐Whitney U‐test) for continuous variables and Pearson's Chi‐square for categorical data were applied for comparative purposes. Results: Average energy and protein intake, as well as percentage requirements met, improved between thaw‐retherm and room service (4320 kJ/day vs 7265 kJ/day; 42.4 g/day vs 82.5 g/day; and 46% vs 80.7%; 49.9% vs 98.4%; all P <.001. Reductions in plate waste (40% vs 15%) and production waste (15% vs 5.6%, P <.001) were observed and food costs decreased by 9% with room service. Meal quality audit results improved, and patient satisfaction increased with % respondents satisfied increasing from 75.0% to 89.8% (χ2 9.985[2]; P =.007) for room service. Conclusions: This research demonstrates significant improvements in patient and organisational outcomes with room service compared to a thaw‐retherm model in a large public hospital. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Since the opening of the new Mater Mothers' Hospital in 2008, innovative initiatives were developed, implemented and evaluated to meet women's nutritional needs. This study evaluated changes in women's nutritional awareness, knowledge and behaviours and compared these data with our baseline survey. Methods: During 2014–2017, 421 postnatal women were surveyed across nine survey periods. Results were compared with those from our 2008 survey (n = 102). Surveys assessed nutrition knowledge, attitudes, behaviour, education preferences, and dietetic service awareness and were distributed on meal trays. Results: A greater proportion of women accessed the nutrition services in 2014–2017 compared with 2008 (19.7% vs 9.9%) and rated the resources favourably (≥3.5 out of 5). A similar proportion rated the importance of eating well postnatally (83.1% vs 92.1%) and returning to their pre‐pregnancy weight (62.4% vs 68.3%) as important/very important. In both periods, women had poor diet quality, despite identifying healthy eating as a high priority. A reduction in median gestational weight gain (GWG) approached significance, 13.0 kg (2014–2017) versus 14.0 kg (2008), P = 0.055. There was a significant association between GWG and cohort with an increase in the proportion of women gaining within their correct guidelines (by 15.4%), a reduction of excessive gain (by 24.7%, P < 0.001) over time. Conclusions: Evidence‐based service changes made since 2008 have effected positive change in women's GWG, service preferences, and access. However, women still require awareness‐raising and behaviour change programs to improve diet quality and GWG to ensure optimal pregnancy outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Poorly controlled gestational diabetes mellitus can result in negative pregnancy and delivery outcomes. A reduced need for insulin was documented in the validation of American gestational diabetes Nutrition Practice Guidelines, which recommend at least three dietitian visits. No Australian gestational diabetes mellitus nutrition guidelines exist. This paper evaluates the implementation of a dietetic model of care based on the American guidelines in an Australian hospital. Methods: The implementation plan consisted of a nine‐month pre (usual care)/post (new model of care) design with a month for ‘integration’ across 2012–2013. Primary outcomes were uptake of the new dietetic model of care and requirement for pharmacotherapy. Results: Both phases ran for seven months; integration required four months. Pre‐intervention, only one woman received a review appointment. Significantly more women received best‐practice care post‐implementation (P = 0.02); of the 162 women seen, 50.6% received two review appointments. As a result of heavy clinical demand, only 31.5% of the women seen post‐implementation received an individual dietitian assessment and education session, deviating from best practice. Clinically relevant changes were seen in medication requirements with a decrease in women requiring pharmacological treatment (31.1% (pre); 26.9% (post)). The difference was more pronounced in women who received best‐practice care (27.2% (no) vs 25.0% (yes)). Conclusions: This project successfully increased the proportion of women seen according to best practice. Service limitations impaired the delivery of optimal care. The present study illustrates the opportunities and challenges of conducting evidence‐based implementation research in routine clinical care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim Methods Results Conclusions Shocks to the food system (such as extreme weather events, wars, and pandemics) are felt by institutional food systems. For hospitals, these shocks affect the quantity, quality, and variety of foods that can be offered to patients. One strategy to buffer the hospital food supply from external threats is to prioritise ingredients produced locally. Thus, the aim of the current research is to describe the country of origin of all foods purchased by a large, metropolitan healthcare organisation and to identify opportunities for improving the locality of the food supply.This study was of a cross‐sectional, observational design. The country of origin for all foods procured over a 1‐year period by a large, urban healthcare organisation was determined by proportion of food budget spend. State of origin was identified for fresh fruit, vegetables, and meat. The organisation was in Queensland, Australia and utilised a cook‐fresh, room‐service foodservice model. Descriptive analysis was used to to determine the number of items and the proportion of budget spend on all foods produced in Australia, and by food category. Similar descriptive statistics were generated to determine the proportion of the budget spend on fresh fruits, vegetables and meats produced in Queensland.Over the 1‐year period, 659 individual food items were purchased by the hospital foodservice, and 502 food items were included in the anlaysis. In total, 53% of the food budget was spent on Australian foods (100% Australian ingredients) and almost all fruit (73%) and vegetables (91%) were Australian grown. Procuring fresh fruit (28%), vegetables (35%), and meat (46%) from within the state was less common, and this may reflect the primary states of production across Australia, and seasonal variability of the food supply.Findings offer priority areas for improving the locality of the food supply. Future research to determine if procuring more foods locally has benefits to consistency of the food supply is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]