Search

Trovafloxacin is a recently approved fluoroquinolone with excellent activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms that offers a potential alternative for treatment of β-lactam-resistant pneumococcal meningitis. Using the rabbit meningitis model, we sought to characterize the pharmacodynamic properties of trovafloxacin in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Animals were given single doses of trovafloxacin of 10, 15, 20 or 30 mg/kg; 1 h after infusion mean CSF concentrations were 0.59 ± 0.18, 0.74 ± 0.14, 1.12 ± 0.12 and 1.07 ± 0.35 mg/L, respectively. The bacterial killing rate increased with increasing dosages of trovafloxacin, indicating that its activity is concentration dependent. All three pharmacodynamic indices (area under the concentration curve (AUC)/MBC, peak concentration (Cmax)/MBC, and time above MBC (T > MBC)) correlated with bacterial killing; however, AUC/MBC correlated best = 0.71). In a second experiment we found comparable bacterial killing with multiple doses of trovafloxacin given either every serum half-life or every two serum half-lives. In both experiments bacterial regrowth occurred when the concentration of trovafloxacin in CSF fell below the MBC. These data have been used in formulating an appropriate regimen for trovafloxacin treatment of bacterial meningitis in children. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Background: Long-acting injectable cabotegravir and rilpivirine have demonstrated safety, acceptability, and efficacy in adults living with HIV-1. The IMPAACT 2017 study (MOCHA study) was the first to use these injectable formulations in adolescents (aged 12-17 years) living with HIV-1. Herein, we report acceptability and tolerability outcomes in cohort 1 of the study., Methods: In this a secondary analysis of a phase 1/2, multicentre, open-label, non-comparative dose-finding study, with continuation of pre-study oral combination antiretroviral treatment (ART), 55 adolescents living with HIV-1 were enrolled to receive sequential doses of either long-acting cabotegravir or rilpivirine and 52 received at least two injections. Participants had a body weight greater than 35 kg and BMI less than 31·5 kg/m 2 and had been on stable ART for at least 90 consecutive days with an HIV-1 viral load of less than 50 copies per mL at a participating IMPAACT study site. Participants had to be willing to continue their pre-study ART during cohort 1. The primary objectives of the study were to confirm doses for oral and injectable cabotegravir and for injectable rilpivirine in adolescents living with HIV. This analysis of participant-reported outcomes included a face scale assessment of pain at each injection and a Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) at baseline and week 16 for participants in the USA, South Africa, Botswana, and Thailand. A subset of 11 adolescents and 11 parents or caregivers in the USA underwent in-depth interviews after receipt of one or two injections. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03497676., Findings: Between March 19, 2019, and Nov 25, 2021, 55 participants were enrolled into cohort 1. Using the six-point face scale, 43 (83%) of participants at week 4 and 38 (73%) at week 8 reported that the injection caused "no hurt" or "hurts little bit", while only a single (2%) participant for each week rated the pain as one of the two highest pain levels. Quality of life was not diminished by the addition of one injectable antiretroviral. In-depth interviews revealed that parents and caregivers in the USA frequently had more hesitancy than adolescents about use of long-acting formulations, but parental acceptance was higher after their children received injections., Interpretation: High acceptability and tolerability of long-acting cabotegravir or rilpivirine injections suggests that these are likely to be favoured treatment options for some adolescents living with HIV., Funding: National Institutes of Health and ViiV Healthcare., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests KC, SB, and DEY received grant funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to support work on this protocol. JC received support to travel and attend a meeting from the IMPAACT Network. AHG's institution has Clinical Trial agreements with ViiV to support work on this study and has a Clinical Trial agreement with Janssen to support other studies; and AHG received payment from ViiV Healthcare to attend a Pediatric Advisory Board meeting. KB, RM, and SW had funds paid to their institution by ViiV Healthcare related to their work on this manuscript. HC and RMVS-R are employees of Janssen and have stock and stock options with Johnson & Johnson. ALA is site principal investigator for multi-site Gilead and Merck studies, a Gilead expert advisory board attendee, a Merck consultant, expert advisory board attendee for ViiV, presenter at a workshop supported by ViiV, part of the Speaker's Bureau for the Simply Speaking HIV Prevention Series, an expert witness, an unpaid Advocates for Youth Board Chair, an unpaid member of the Well Project Board, and an unpaid HIVMA Vice Chair. AC-G is a ViiV Healthcare consultant and has received funds from Merck and Janssen. CCM, VC, and CH are employees at ViiV Healthcare. CCM and VC own GSK stock or stock options. DEY was previously an unpaid technical advisor for the following non-profit institutions: Cover the Globe and Maipelo Trust. JH is an employee at GSK. DEY is an employee of NIH. AA, AB, EDL, RO, CB-M, CS-A, BH, JK, and JDA declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: In the Long-Acting Antiretroviral Treatment Enabling Trial 2 (LATTE-2) phase 2b study, long-acting (LA) injectable cabotegravir + rilpivirine dosed every 8 weeks (Q8W) or every 4 weeks (Q4W) demonstrated comparable efficacy with daily oral antiretroviral therapy (ART) through 96 weeks in ART-naive adults with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). Here we report efficacy, tolerability, and safety of cabotegravir + rilpivirine LA over approximately 5 years., Methods: After 20 weeks of oral cabotegravir + abacavir/lamivudine, participants were randomized to cabotegravir + rilpivirine LA Q8W or Q4W or continue oral ART through the 96-week maintenance period. In the extension period through week 256, participants continued their current LA regimen (randomized Q8W/Q4W groups) or switched from oral ART to Q8W or Q4W LA therapy (extension-switch groups). Endpoints assessed included proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL (Snapshot algorithm) and adverse events (AEs)., Results: At week 256, 186 of 230 (81%) participants in randomized Q8W/Q4W groups and 41 of 44 (93%) participants in extension-switch groups had HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL. No protocol-defined virologic failures occurred after week 48. Injection wsite reactions infrequently resulted in discontinuation (4 [2%] and 1 [2%] participants in randomized Q8W/Q4W and extension-switch groups, respectively). Three participants in randomized Q8W/Q4W groups experienced drug-related serious AEs, including 1 fatal serious AE (Q4W group); none occurred in extension-switch groups. Of 25 participants with AEs leading to withdrawal, 20 were in the randomized Q4W group; no AE leading to withdrawal occurred in >1 participant., Conclusions: Cabotegravir + rilpivirine LA exhibited long-term efficacy and tolerability, demonstrating its durability as maintenance therapy for HIV-1 infection.Clinical Trials Registration. NCT02120352., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

A retrospective analysis of the randomized controlled DART (Development of AntiRetroviral Therapy in Africa; ISRCTN13968779) trial in HIV-1-positive adults initiating antiretroviral therapy with co-formulated zidovudine/lamivudine plus either tenofovir, abacavir, or nevirapine was conducted to evaluate the safety of initiating standard lamivudine dosing in patients with impaired creatinine clearance (CLcr). Safety data collected through 96 weeks were analyzed after stratification by baseline CLcr (estimated using Cockcroft-Gault) of 30-49 mL/min (n = 168) versus ≥50 mL/min (n = 3,132) and treatment regimen. The Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (for hematological, hepatic and gastrointestinal events), maximal toxicities for liver enzymes, serum creatinine and bilirubin and maximum treatment-emergent hematology toxicities were comparable for groups with baseline CLcr 30-49 versus CLcr≥50 mL/min. No new risks or trends were identified from this dataset. Substantial and similar increases in the mean creatinine clearance (>25 mL/min) were observed from baseline though Week 96 among participants who entered the trial with CLcr 30-49 mL/min, while no increase or smaller median changes in creatinine clearance (<7 mL/min) were observed for participants who entered the trial with CLcr ≥50 mL/min. Substantial increases (> 150 cells/ mm3) in mean CD4+ cells counts from baseline to Week 96 were also observed for participants who entered the trial with CLcr 30-49 mL/min and those with baseline CLcr ≥50 mL/min. Though these results are descriptive, they suggest that HIV-positive patients with CLcr of 30-49 mL/min would have similar AE risks in comparison to patients with CLcr ≥50 mL/min when initiating antiretroviral therapy delivering doses of 300 mg of lamivudine daily through 96 weeks of treatment. Overall improvements in CLcr were observed for patients with baseline CLcr 30-49 mL/min., Competing Interests: We have the following interests: LLR, ART, CCM, AC, TP, and MSS are employees of ViiV Healthcare and own stock in GlaxoSmithKline. ASW discloses receiving grant funding for the DART trial from the UK Medical Research Council, the UK Department for International Development, and the Rockefeller Foundation; receiving nonfinancial support from ViiV Healthcare, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences, and Boehringer Ingelheim, all of which donated drugs for the DART trial; receiving funding from Gilead Sciences for teaching courses on Critical Appraisal; and receiving funding from Janssen for sitting on a Data Safety Monitoring Board. YL was an employee of PAREXEL International and owns stock in GlaxoSmithKline. DMG discloses nonfinancial support from GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead, and Boehringer Ingelheim, all of which provided drugs for the DART trial, and nonfinancial support from Gilead, ViiV Healthcare, CIPLA, and Mylan, all of which donated drugs for HIV trials outside of the submitted work. JD is an employee of and owns stock in GlaxoSmithKline. CG, PM, GM, and CMK have nothing to disclose. HG discloses receiving funds in the form of a grant from MRC/UVRI Uganda Research Unit on AIDS, during which time HG was the Unit Director and drew a salary from MRC (UK) during the conduct of the study. JH and PNM have nothing to disclose. This retrospective analysis of data through 96 weeks from the DART trial was supported by ViiV Healthcare using data provided by the DART trial sponsors, the Medical Research Council of the United Kingdom. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter our adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

We have previously described an in vitro model for the evaluation of the effects of different immunomodulatory agents and immunotoxins (ITs) on cells latently infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). We demonstrated that latently infected, replication-competent cells can be generated in vitro after eliminating CD25+ cells with an IT. Thus, by selectively killing the productively infected cells with an anti-CD25 IT we can generate a population of latently infected cells. CD25- cells generated in this manner were treated with nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors and subsequently activated with phytohemagglutinin in the presence of the drugs. The antiviral activities of zidovudine (ZDV), lamivudine (3TC), and abacavir (ABC) were evaluated by using this model. 3TC and ABC demonstrated significant activity in decreasing HIV production from recently infected resting cells following their activation, whereas the effect of ZDV was more modest. These results suggest that the differences in antiviral activity of nucleoside analogs on resting cells should be considered when designing drug combinations for the treatment of HIV infection. The model presented here offers a convenient alternative for evaluating the mechanism of action of new antiretroviral agents (J. Saavedra, C. Johnson, J. Koester, M. St. Claire, E. Vitteta, O. Ramilo, 37th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. I-59, 1997).

Dexamethasone (DXM) interferes with the production of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin-1 (IL-1) and can thereby diminish the secondary inflammatory response that follows initiation of antibacterial therapy. A beneficial effect on the outcome of Haemophilus meningitis in children has been proven, but until recently the effect of DXM therapy in pneumococcal meningitis was uncertain. The aim of the present study was to evaluate factors that might influence the modulatory effect of DXM on the antibiotic-induced inflammatory response in a rabbit model of pneumococcal meningitis. DXM (1 mg/kg) was given intravenously 30 min before or 1 h after administration of a pneumococcal cell wall extract, or the first dose of ampicillin. In meningitis induced by cell wall extract, DXM therapy prevented the increase in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leucocyte and lactate concentrations, but only if given 30 min before the cell wall extract. In meningitis caused by live organisms, initiation of ampicillin therapy resulted in an increase in CSF TNF-alpha and lactate concentrations only in animals with initial CSF bacterial concentrations > or =5.6 log10 cfu/mL. In those animals, DXM therapy prevented significant elevations in CSF TNF-alpha [median change -184 pg/mL, -114 pg/mL versus +683 pg/mL with DXM (30 min before or 1 h after ampicillin) versus controls (no DXM), respectively, P=0.02] and lactate concentrations [median change -10.6 mmol/L, -1.5 mmol/L versus +14.3 mmol/L with DXM (30 min before or 1 h after ampicillin) versus controls (no DXM), respectively, P=0.01]. These effects were independent of the timing of DXM administration. In this model of experimental pneumococcal meningitis, an antibiotic-induced secondary inflammatory response in the CSF was demonstrated only in animals with high initial CSF bacterial concentrations (> or =5.6 log10 cfu/mL). These effects were modulated by DXM therapy whether it was given 30 min before or 1 h after the first dose of ampicillin.

The emergence of multidrug-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae drives the development and evaluation of new antipneumococcal agents, especially for the treatment of bacterial meningitis. The aims of the present study were to assess the antibacterial effectiveness of two new quinolones, garenoxacin (BMS; BMS-284756) and moxifloxacin (MOX) in experimental meningitis caused by a vancomycin (VAN)-tolerant S. pneumoniae strain and to compare the results with those obtained by therapy with VAN and ceftriaxone (CRO) in combination. Meningitis was induced in young male New Zealand White rabbits by intracisternal inoculation of a VAN-tolerant pneumococcal strain (strain Tupelo) from a child with meningitis. Sixteen hours after inoculation, therapy was given by intravenous administration of BMS at 20 mg/kg of body weight, followed 5 h later by administration at a dosage of 10 mg/kg (n = 9 animals) or MOX as two doses of 20 mg/kg every 5 h (n = 8 animals). For comparison, we studied the following groups: (i) animals treated with VAN (20 mg/kg every 5 h, three doses) and CRO (125 mg/kg, one dose) (n = 9), (ii) animals infected with a VAN-tolerant strain but not treated (n = 8), (iii) animals infected with a VAN-tolerant pneumococcus isolated from the nasopharynx of a carrier and treated with BMS (n = 8), and (iv) animals infected with a cephalosporin-resistant type 6B S. pneumoniae strain and treated with BMS (n = 6). The MICs of penicillin, CRO, VAN, BMS, and MOX for the Tupelo strain were 2, 1, 0.5, 0.06, and 0.03 micro g/ml, respectively. The rates of killing of strain Tupelo (the change in the log(10) number of CFU per milliliter per hour) in cerebrospinal fluid at 5 h were -0.70 +/- 0.35, -0.61 +/- 0.44, and -0.49 +/- 0.36 for BMS, MOX, and VAN-CRO, respectively. Therapy with BMS and MOX was as effective as therapy with VAN-CRO against VAN-tolerant pneumococcal meningitis in rabbits.

Moxifloxacin, an 8-methoxyquinolone with broad-spectrum activity in vitro, was studied in the rabbit model of Escherichia coli meningitis. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the bactericidal effectiveness and the pharmacodynamic profile of moxifloxacin in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and to compare the bactericidal activity with that of ceftriaxone and meropenem therapy. After induction of meningitis, animals were given single doses of 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg or divided-dose regimens of 5, 10, and 20 mg/kg twice, separated by 6 h. After single doses, the penetration of moxifloxacin into purulent CSF, measured as percentage of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) in CSF relative to the AUC in plasma, was approximately 50%. After single doses of 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg, the maximum CSF concentration (C(max)) values were 1.8, 4.2, and 4.9 microg/ml, respectively; the AUC values (total drug) were 13.4, 25.4, and 27.1 microg/ml x h, respectively, and the half-life values (t(1/2)) were 6.7, 6.6, and 4.7 h, respectively. The bacterial killing in CSF for moxifloxacin, calculated as the Deltalog(10) CFU per milliliter per hour, at 3, 6, and 12 h after single doses of 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg were -5.70, -6.62, and -7.02; -7.37, -7.37, and -6.87; and -6.62, -6.62, and -6.62, respectively, whereas those of ceftriaxone and meropenem were -4.18, -5.24, and -4.43, and -3.64, -3.59, and -4.12, respectively. The CSF pharmacodynamic indices of AUC/MBC and C(max)/MBC were interrelated (r = 0.81); there was less correlation with T > MBC (r = 0.74). In this model, therapy with moxifloxacin appears to be at least as effective as ceftriaxone and more effective than meropenem therapy in eradicating E. coli from CSF.

With the emergence of beta-lactam antibiotic resistance among strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae, vancomycin has assumed an important role in the treatment of bacterial meningitis. Using the rabbit meningitis model, we evaluated the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of vancomycin in this setting. Animals were given 80 mg/kg of body weight daily in two or four divided doses to determine the penetration and activity of vancomycin in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF); each regimen was administered with and without dexamethasone. Mean peak (2 h) concentrations in CSF that were four- to eightfold higher than the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC; 0.5 microgram/ml) for the pathogen were adequate for bacterial clearance. In both groups concentrations in CSF remained higher than the MBC for greater than 80% of the respective dosing intervals, and the penetration of vancomycin into CSF was 20%. Mean concentrations in CSF at 24 to 36 h of therapy were lower than those achieved during the first 12 h, consistent with a decline in the level of antibiotic entry into CSF as inflammation wanes. Rates of bacterial clearance were similar for the two regimens, and for all animals cultures of CSF were sterile by 36 h. The coadministration of dexamethasone significantly reduced the penetration of vancomycin into CSF by 29% and significantly lowered the rate of bacterial clearance during the first 6 h in animals receiving 20-mg/kg doses of vancomycin. For animals receiving 40-mg/kg doses, therapeutic peak concentrations in CSF were obtained even with steroid use, suggesting that the effect of steroids may be circumvented by the use of larger daily doses of vancomycin.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pharmacodynamics of a new fluoroquinolone, gatifloxacin (AM-1155), in experimental pneumococcal meningitis. The penetration of gatifloxacin into CSF, calculated as the percentage of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) in CSF over the AUC in blood, was 46 to 56%. Gatifloxacin showed linear pharmacokinetics in CSF, and 1 h after intravenous dosages of 7.5, 15, or 30 mg/kg of body weight, peak CSF concentrations were 0.46 +/- 0.08 (mean +/- standard deviation), 0.94 +/- 0.16, and 1.84 +/- 0.5 microg/ml, respectively. The elimination half-life of gatifloxacin in CSF was 3. 8 to 5.6 h (compared with 2.7 to 3.2 h in blood). There was a significant interrelationship among the highest measured values of gatifloxacin in blood and CSF/minimal bactericidal concentration (Cpeak/MBC), the time antibiotic concentrations exceeded the MBC (T > MBC), and AUC/MBC (r = 0.94); in single-dose experiments, each correlated significantly with the bacterial killing rate. Divided-dose regimens, resulting in greater T > MBC values but lower Cpeak/MBC ratios, were more effective in terms of bacterial clearance compared with corresponding single-dose regimens. Gatifloxacin therapy was as effective as currently recommended regimens (e.g., a combination of ceftriaxone and vancomycin) against this highly cephalosporin-resistant pneumococcal strain. The bactericidal activity of gatifloxacin in CSF was closely related to the AUC/MBC ratio, but maximal activity was achieved only when drug concentrations exceeded the MBC for the entire dosing interval.